[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 1.12 MB, 1154x1600, belts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8433890 No.8433890[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What do you think about my belt collection?

>> No.8433906

>>8433890
Why are they all fucking black? Get some god damn colour.

>> No.8433916

>>8433906
What colour?

Black is my style. Most of my wardrobe is black or grey.

I hate brown color with passion. Not sure what other colors do you think would suit a belt. White would be retarded.

>> No.8433936

>obnoxious belt buckles
>effay

muh designer

>> No.8433941
File: 44 KB, 500x500, Salvatore-Ferragamo-Suede-Double-Gancini-Belt,-Blue-b46-500x500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8433941

>>8433916
White belts are 2009.
I go for a variety of colour and materials. I personally like black and brown (several shades) leather belts. Beige, blue and brown suede belts.

Not everyone likes canvas belts, but if you want something casual, you're a good option.

>> No.8433945

>>8433890
Every single one is horrible. Belts look best when the buckle is small and simple.

>> No.8433948

>>8433936
>look at me, I'm so minimalistic
faggot

>>8433945
yeah, but I'm not a small guy

I think small looks lame.

>> No.8433954

>>8433945
The last two are small buckles.

They just look big. If you have strong physique they don't look that big.

They only look big on skinny twink asian faggots.

>> No.8433955

lol how bout u get pants that fit and dont need a belt shitfuck

those belts are ugly, obnoxious buckles as >>8433936 said. Do u tuck ur shirt behind it so u can show da buckle, friend :^) ?

>> No.8433959

>>8433955
I do have pants that fit idiot.

Belt looks good, why would I not wear it?

+ if it's designer it signals status/money despite what you hipster faggots think

>> No.8433981

>>8433959
fucking leave, you dress like shit

>> No.8433986

>>8433981
>implying
Who is saying that. Butthurt asian manlet who dresses in twink clothing?

Or are you just mad you can't afford Gucci, pleb?

Go to club and let's see how hot bitches value your hipster minimalistic style over some in your face yolo swagger

>> No.8433991

>>8433948
>>8433890
get the Gucci belt brah. Shit looks dank. srs

>> No.8433993

>>8433981
LOL!

Look who is talking:
>>8431274
>>8431431
>>8431519
>>8431536
>>8431576
>>8431667
>>8431681
>>8431710
>>8431868
>>8432456
>>8433168
>>8433232
>>8433235
>>8433254
>>8433301
>>8433333
>>8433488
>>8433593
>>8433607
>>8433655
>>8433693
>>8433707
>>8433712
>>8433816
ARGUMENT: INVALID

All of these people look like beta twinks that would get beat up in a heartbeat by legitimate pussy slayers.

Pencil neck faggots, JUST LOL BUDDYBOYS!

JUST LOL!

>> No.8433994

Capitalism claims another victim

>> No.8434005

kek.

>> No.8434011

>>8433994
I need to spend money somewhere dude. Besides, I have bought these over several years. Some of these I didn't even buy, they were given to me.

I could go to the store and buy 10 of those "minimalistic" hipster belts you drool over today.

But why? Why do you think bigger buckles are bad taste? Why do you think "in your face" is not good sometimes? And LOL if you think the last 2 are big. They are small and minimalistic.

Also, if you are wearing a custom sweater on naked skin with rough jeans a rough belt with a larger buckle looks appropriate.

Learn about different styles. Shellac for example:
http://harajuju.net/Topic-Shellac?page=3

>> No.8434015
File: 163 KB, 578x800, p1540984.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434015

>>8434005
Argument please?

Implying this doesn't look cool and edgy.

Only losers try to blend in.

>> No.8434016

lol this damage control

>>8434011
still ugly m8 sry

>> No.8434021

>>8433993
Ok so you're from that virgin board. Do you think we wouldn't notice? The last guy you linked is very well known on your virgin forum.

So you're real cool huh, all that swag no way could you possibly be an "incel" (lol)... Oh wait.

>> No.8434022

>>8434016
subjective

If it's ugly, why is everyone saying it looks good?

Explain

Please post your examples of good style.

inb4 some twink hipster with cuffed jeans and a mustache

>> No.8434028

>>8434011
>custom sweater
>naked skin

>> No.8434030

>>8434021
>virgin board
WHAT? Dude, I'm not a virgin. I don't know what board are you referring to.

Who is the last guy?

I'm not an incel by any measure.

>> No.8434039

>>8434028
So? You don't have grandma that sews you one new cashmere or merino sweater every month? Sucks to be you.

>> No.8434047

>>8434030
If you're not an incel why do you post on a forum full of incels crying about their face? You've been found out, time to go back to the den. You're not even interested in fashion are you?

>> No.8434055

>>8434011

I know you're just baiting but

You keep using the term minimalistic like it's bad. Belts were designed to hold pants up and be a nice break to transition from shirt to pants. It's meant to be subtle, not flashy. Much like a watch. Pulling attention to either by being huge and gaudy is generally viewed as tacky and undesirable by those into fashion rather than those who just like expensive names. You're allowed to lile these things but do realize people will think of you as someone who just likes expensive names.

>> No.8434057

>>8434047
>If you're not an incel why do you post on a forum full of incels crying about their face?
I don't.

>You're not even interested in fashion are you?
I've probably been on /fa/ longer than you.

At first I wanted to dress like a faggot hipster, then I realised those guys are doormats and betas and that tough guys dress differently and I need to keep up with the style to get those pussies even more wet

>> No.8434059

>>8434055
Like not lile. Sorry I'm on my phone.

>> No.8434067

>>8434055
I'm not baiting anyone.

Minimalistic is bad because it's overused.

It's easy to dress minimalistic. Look. I buy some sleek jeans, some belt with almost absent buckle.

Believe me, I could dress like that. I have a wardrobe full of clean ironed shirts, sleek pants, bespoke suits, slim fitting clothes in general.

But I don't need to go to an office and I work from home. So I can basically wear whatever I want. I want to dress a bit like a rockstar even if I'm not one. That means biker accessories, rough leather jacket some in your face belt buckle from an expensive brand, keeping it in black/grey/silver.

Chicks dig it, I get the looks. And it fits my build (fitfag here).

How is it not fashionable just because it's not hipster/minimalistic/asian incel style?

I mean, go to Japan and see the styles there. I bet you will call them "fashionable" just because they are asian scum and can dress how they want. When I dress like that suddenly it's not cool. Again, not cool to asian betas and twig weaklings posting on /fa/. Actual hot girls find this style appealing and masculine. Masculine > Everything

>> No.8434070

>>8434067

You're allowed to think that. Realize that's not what everyone likes. And somepeople dress the way they like rather than the way to get girls. It's preference

>> No.8434090

>>8433890
>2014
>belts
dafuq?

>> No.8434103

>>8434067
>muh masculinity

>> No.8434107

>>8434067
>Minimalistic is bad because it's overused.
minimal and functional, why would anyone dress differently? you're an idiot

>> No.8434140

>>8434107
>minimal and functional
Functionality is for plebs. Bentley is not minimal, nor functional, but it gets respect and pussies wet.
Broque interior is not functional, it's overstyled and grand. And it's beautiful.

Stop worshipping "muh functionality" and your bullshit tech wear. This is not what normal people find attractive.

Normal people like avant garde and gorgeous decors, that includes detailed belt buckles with interesting pattern.

>> No.8434146

>>8434067
>implying most people on /fa/ are dressing for girls

>> No.8434148

>>8434140

I'm normal and I don't find this impressive.

>> No.8434149

>>8434067
>Chicks dig it, I get the looks. And it fits my build (fitfag here).
Typical insecure /fit/ dumbass dressing and lifting for girls. Pathetic.

>> No.8434153

>>8433890
>buying overprice brand belts

Something more generic would do just fine.

>> No.8434157

>>8434039
>hand knit by my meemaw isn't the same as "Kustom Sweaterz"

>> No.8434164

Get rid of three of those black belts and get one brown belt.

>> No.8434167

>>8434148
>normal
>4chan
>/fa/
No, you're not

>>8434153
I know, but a brand belt adds a little bit of extra status boost to shallow people. Especially if it's a known brand like Dolce Gabbana or Gucci or LV. I'm planning on buying LV by the way.

Sure, it's primitive, shallow, but it works. It catches attention and those who know the brands assume you are automatically of higher status, maybe a jerk, but chicks dig jerks.

>> No.8434170

I don't like any of them.

>> No.8434174

>>8434167

The gucci belts and accessories have been faked so much that if you aren't rich people would assume it's fake.

>> No.8434175

>>8433948
What so did you buy the Gucci logo belt buckle because you really like the design?

>> No.8434179

>>8433959
>if it's designer it signals status/money
Nah, it signals that you're a brandwhore who saved up a ton of money to buy tacky items that just scream "I COST A LOT OF MONEY"

>> No.8434184

>>8434167

If you're going to stereotype me I'm just going to assume you like chinese cartoons because you're on this board and your diet consists of Doritos and Mountain Dew.

You can't just assume things over the internet mate. Many of us came to /b/ when we were extremely underaged and leave it when we grow up and don't think the same racist jokes are funny anymore

>> No.8434185

>>8434174
more like fuccbois in dreamboxes will think it's fake

>> No.8434188

>>8434015
You look just like every other noveau riche fag at my university, no-one thinks you look as good as you think they do.

>> No.8434189

>>8434149
>Typical insecure /fit/ dumbass dressing and lifting for girls. Pathetic.
Why would I not be doing that? How is it pathetic? Why would I be lifting for myself? That's autistic. The whole point of species is to procreate. The point of life is to get laid. Why would I not do whatever I can to maximize my chances? Think about it. Logically.

>> No.8434193

Post a fit fuccboi

>> No.8434194

>>8434157
>hand knit by my meemaw isn't the same as "Kustom Sweaterz"
It's exactly that. I get compliments on those sweaters regularly. And they are perfectly tailored. Top quality fabric. And grandmother has some good skill in this. Don't be mad.

>> No.8434195

>>8434140
>Bentley
>Broque
>not functional
how's your first day?

>> No.8434197

>>8434189
>being a slave to your instincts this much
Free your mind

>> No.8434202

>>8434175
>What so did you buy the Gucci logo belt buckle because you really like the design?
Yes, I like the design. It's sleek black, fits with most of my clothes. Have the brand appeal to shallow club sluts and consumer whores. What's not to like? I don't like their other belts though. I also like the Louis Vuitton taiga belt and the Kiryuryik belt from offside web. Will be buying those next I think.

>>8434179
>Nah, it signals that you're a brandwhore who saved up a ton of money to buy tacky items that just scream "I COST A LOT OF MONEY"
I make enough that I don't need to save. I can buy this shit every month and still have a few thousand euros left to put into my savings account and index funds.

>> No.8434203

>>8434189
not n e more m8, the point of the species isnt to 'procreate' anymore. w/ that logic black welfare moms w/ 9 kids have accomplished more than u evr will. we are prob overpopulated so

>> No.8434206

>>8434189
>being this autistic

>> No.8434208

>>8434189
Lol girls compliment or approach me to mention my clothing regularly at clubs etc. I won't twll you what brand as I don't want a pleb to own any of the pieces... But it's basic pieces with unique twists that make them stand out. Especially the trainers.

>> No.8434212

>>8434188
>You look just like every other noveau riche fag at my university, no-one thinks you look as good as you think they do.
If I look like every other noveau rich fag how come I have not yet once seen a person dressing even remotely similar to me in real life? I am not talking about fashion catalogs. Yes, there are some similar styles in fashion catalogs. I'm talking about real life. This style makes me actually stand out of the grey mass. How is this bad again?

>> No.8434213

>>8434202
>Wanting shallow club sluts and consumer whores

see:
>>8434197

>> No.8434216

>>8434195
Baroque

Irony is, I've been with 4chan since 2006. I'm literally and oldfag. U mad?

>> No.8434217

>>8434212
I see idiots like you all the time at my university, all rich trust fund babies who have money but no taste. But hey, at least they aren't as obnoxious as you about it.

>> No.8434223

A few years ago, we had a 1st year analyst walk across the trading floor with a Gucci ‘G’ belt buckle. “Hey bubba, I didn’t know The Gap made belts,” bellows out a trader. “Um, it’s Gucci,” the kid snaps back. The words are barely out of his mouth before he realizes he’s being mocked in front of half a dozen guys and just made it a lot worse. That was all it took; the kid was never able to earn even a modicum of respect after that, and ended up leaving the firm less than a year later.

>> No.8434224

>>8434203
sounds like someone who can't get laid is pretty mad, I saw your fits. You look asexual and not anything girls would desire. Sucks to be you.

Feel free to prove me wrong though

>> No.8434226

The bottom pimp-esque printed ally pattern and the obnoxious logo-ridden gucci belt probably make you look like a tool. The rest look nice.

>> No.8434229

>>8434208
Oh, do your trainers light up?

>> No.8434232

>>8433890
They're all disgusting. Gucci makes fantastic belts but belts don't look as good with that LV style patterning. You bought their worst offering.

The buckle is weird too. You'll just cheapen your whole outfit by choosing something like that.

If you want to show off Gucci, try a tee with the logo stripe across it. And a Gucci stripe wallet. You can look good and have "swag" but not with belts of that nature IMO.

>> No.8434234

>>8434208
post fit fuccboi

>> No.8434241

>>8434206
>being autistic
>being normal human being who wants to procreate and look valued in society

I don't think you know what autistic means. I'm not adam lanza, some crazy incel virgin who shoots up schools. I'm a normal guy who wants to get laid and maximize his chances by a unique and edgy style. Get it right.

>>8434213
>Wanting shallow club sluts and consumer whores
Sour grapes buddy boy, nobody wants your flat intellectual freckled ginger tomgirl. Hot chicks are for hot guys. Deal with it.

>> No.8434251

>>8434241
>2014
>obsessed with procreation
>caveman pls

>> No.8434254

>>8434217
So, I take it you are jealous then? Just because they are rich, doesn't mean the clothes are bad. Just because many people wear it, does not make it objectively shit. How come you believe your taste is better? Do you have any objective reasons to list? Other than "noveau rich fag" or other ad hominem bullshit?

>> No.8434256
File: 340 KB, 351x440, 1326888507375.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434256

>> No.8434260

>>8434251
>not wanting to procreate

>> No.8434263

>>8434217
>idiots
Why is someone who is rich and wears designer clothing an idiot again? Please explain, it would be very interesting to hear.

>> No.8434274

>>8434223
>A few years ago, we had a 1st year analyst walk across the trading floor with a Gucci ‘G’ belt buckle. “Hey bubba, I didn’t know The Gap made belts,” bellows out a trader. “Um, it’s Gucci,” the kid snaps back.
I don't work as an analyst. Do you really believe that I would wear such flashy clothes working in an investment firm? Really?

>> No.8434282

>>8434226
>tool
Why tool? Is tool the same as douchebag? Douchebags are edgy guys who get laid a lot. It's more of a compliment than an insult. If you called me a pussy, I'd be upset then.

I have never heard a girl use term "tool" to describe a guy. I think it's something low testosterone beta males and nerds use against guys who intimidate them aka against /fit/fags, swagfags, yolofags, gangstas, etc...

>> No.8434287
File: 48 KB, 582x389, population.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434287

>>8434189
>The point of life is to get laid.
Pure unadulterated pleb.
Look at this graph. Look at it.
Fucking idiots like you are going to destroy the planet or at least drastically reduce standards of living. And for nothing.

>> No.8434289

>>8434241
You're an incel PUAHater with no style. Why hasn't your Gucci belt got you laid while my no-logo stuff has got me approached?

If you want to learn how to stand out you could learn.

I might try LV belts and True Religion in a club just as a test. I also bought the coral Raf sweater as a test... I think it's hard for a guy in a pink sweatshirt not to stand out, and if you're not a twink you'll look straight still. What girl will notice that Gucci belt in the dark nightlife atmosphere? How will you stand out? It's black all over it will blend in entirely.

Even black people can afford Gucci belts nowadays so I don't think a woman will be impressed.

>> No.8434309
File: 522 KB, 1444x1286, Screen Shot 2014-07-01 at 16.27.00.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434309

OP here.

What do you think of belt in pic related?

I think I'm going to buy this one next. Looks flashy, elegant, baroque styled.

I'm not trolling.

>> No.8434316

>>8434289
I'm neither puahater, nor incel, nor have no style.

I have no problems getting laid.

Please post your belt and fit

I have pink shirts as well. Pink for guys is nothing new.

>> No.8434321

>>8434287
>hurr my planet
>my future
Shut up nerd, who gives a shit
U mad?

It's not like I'm having any kids. Learn what condoms are.

>> No.8434324

>>8434309
>baroque
what?
>elegant
Looks cheap as fuck, m8.

>> No.8434336

Ok, now I want you guys to counter my posts with PICTURES. Post what YOU think looks cool/ fashionable/ elegant. Post some cool belts that you think are better than mine.

Post some examples of fits. Let's keep this discussion going.

>> No.8434343

>>8434316
You're throwing around the terminology and catch phrases everywhere. I don't own any belts I meant my other stuff is unbranded but I usually wear an accent piece to get noticed. Something bright and eyecatching or something very different will get you attention.

Your pink shirt probably would get you more attention than your Gucci belt which in the darkness of a bar would be rendered basically invisible. So why not just wear minimalist belts?

>> No.8434347

>>8434343
>So why not just wear minimalist belts?
I could. I'm just bored with them.

I really have no rules to abide by. I don't have to have office attire. I can wear what I want.

I am also tall and quite fit which makes even big buckles look fine on me. If I dressed like the jew from Big Bang Theory, they'd look obnoxious.

>> No.8434355

>>8434216
>>8434140
>>8434309
>baroque
this is the cancer that's killing /fa/

>> No.8434364

>>8434355
Oh shut up faggot and learn to accept other opinions. I was here long before you.

>> No.8434367

>>8434282
Tool is the type of guy who wants to come off as masculine with his possessions but fails miserably. But if you want to nail the type of chicks who are attracted to toolish guys, then good for ya.

>> No.8434391

>>8434364
>baroque

>> No.8434409

>>8434367
>fails miserably
And what made you conclude that I fail miserably?

Let's look at it objectively now, with no emotions:
1) I am tall
2) I am fit
3) I have strong jawline
4) I wear masculine looking clothes and wear footwear that is conventionally associate with masculinity (heavy boots, combat boots).
5) I dress in masculine colors (dark colors).

Hmm, how do I fail again? Just because I posted on /fa/ and you HAD to put me down because I do not conform to your particular minimalistic and functional style that you all are so fond of here on /fa/?

>But if you want to nail the type of chicks who are attracted to toolish guys, then good for ya.
Interesting. Which chicks would be attracted to guys who try to be masculine, but fail miserably? Because according to you, that's a "toolish" guy. I think there are no such chicks. All women are attracted to masculine men. Period. All of them are. If you don't believe me, look at the Jeremy Meeks incident. Hot, masculine bad boy. He would not dress in cuffed pants or hipster style. Not in a million years.

Most women are attracted to guys like that. It's just science and nature. Those who are not are usually in some way, form or shape defective and suffer from the dreaded sour grape syndrome aka "She is too slutty looking, eww [I couldn't get her in a million years]" or "he is too much of a douchebag and too arrogant [translation: He would never find me attractive, because I'm flat and have no ass]".
[cont]

>> No.8434412

>>8434409
[cont]
It could be a variety of reasons why a woman has low self esteem and goes for a lower quality male (asian manlet with weak frame or some pale ginger faggot with allergies):
1) Low self esteem
2) Unfeminine body (flat, fat or curve-less/no tits/no ass)
3) Bad complexion (pale, freckled, ginger, appealing only to beta males who settle for scraps)
4) Bad facial features (no defined cheekbones, jaw, weak bite, etc..)
5) Low estrogen

The bottom line is: masculinity is objective and clothes can enhance or take away from it. The belts I posted conform the masculine style, at least many of those. Big belt buckles, rough leather, in your face design, it all goes hand in hand with bad boy biker style. Why the hell would you not want to look like that?

Sure, I intimidate nerds and some beta asians who will call be a tool behind my back, but who cares? I don't need to get laid with them.

>> No.8434417

>>8434409
>replying to these nerds

>> No.8434420
File: 100 KB, 555x526, mfwshia.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434420

>>8434364
>I was here long before you.
thread confirmed for b8

>> No.8434431

>>8434420
I don't see how this is bait. I really don't. I posted long time ago on /fa/, posted my fits. I was with 4chan for many, many years. I left /fa/ after a while I realised your style is way too similar. Either gothninja, that is pretty retarded to normal people OR some semi-hipsterish poorfag style. I'd rather go to styleforum to get style advice. Although most of them are dadcore.

>>8434417
Yes, doing exactly that.

>> No.8434438

>>8434409
I said probably
Seems like your insecurity over your masculinity made you instantly take it as an accusation
I barely know you yet you felt to list all your merits just to prove yourself
toplel

>> No.8434466

>>8434438
Is this really considered to be top lel? Do you really think it clarifies as top? I understand lel, but top? Isn't it a bit too much. It sounds similar to people using "hilarious" where the situation far from warranties it's use.

Yes, I wanted to continue discussion. I wanted to say that in my case I would not clarify as a "tool" according to your definition as objectively my features make me quite masculine. I even grow out facial hair a bit, adding more to masculinity.

Therefore, I think a better term would be "douchebag", since I'm quite arrogant, extraverted and dress in "loud" clothing. Not pink or toxic colours, but some "gaudy" accessories.

Then again, what is gaudy? If a woman likes you, she will think your clothes are sexy. My gf says everything looks hot on me. Gucci belt, Japanese belt, vest on naked body, everything. That's love for ya.

If she loves/likes you, she will rationalise everything as cool, edgy, masculine, sexy. If she doesn't, you can wear the hottest clothes, be a super cool hipster, dressed in Maison Martin Margiela and still get turned down and seen as creepy/manlet or something.

>> No.8434496

>>8434431
>long time ago
>many, many years

is this new pasta?

>> No.8434498

>>8434496
>pasta
Great argument, boyo.

Please explain the reasons why you believe what I say is "trolling" or "copypasta" or any variation of the sort. Please, go ahead. I'm waiting.

>> No.8434506
File: 2.88 MB, 720x400, crayasianbitch.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434506

>>8434498
I shouldn't have to if you've actually been here forever.

>> No.8434509

>>8434506
Again, stop posting meme, but explain why it's so unreasonable for me to tell those things.

Why would I lie on the internet? What's the point?

Just because I don't use the traditional /fa/ and 4chan lingo, because I prefer not to, automatically renders me a newfag? Really?

It makes no logical sense.

>> No.8434516
File: 44 KB, 453x576, really.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434516

>>8434509

>> No.8434520
File: 979 KB, 500x281, laughing.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434520

>>8434509
>Why would I lie on the internet?

>> No.8434524

>>8434516
Yes, exactly. I see no reason why one would do that.

It makes no logical sense. If I want an opinion, I post the truth.

I understand that other people might lie on the internet, but it's not like you have a profile here. I am not a tripfag, so I have no reason to inflate my self esteem by posting false facts here.

All what I have posted is the truth.

If I want to hear opinions of my life, I will post the truthful facts and not falsifications.

It would defeat the purpose to lie.

It literally makes no sense to lie on the internet if you are anonymous. NONE

>> No.8434526

>>8434506
everytime this webm is posted I end up watching the whole thing

>> No.8434527
File: 845 KB, 300x192, fuckthis.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434527

>>8434509
>stop posting meme
>Why would I lie on the internet?
>What's the point?
>newfag
>logical sense
>logical

>> No.8434533
File: 1.87 MB, 274x200, lelion king.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434533

>>8434524

>> No.8434561

>>8434527
So? What's your point. Please explain. I know that you are implying and trying to ad hominem, but can you please answer my questions? Preferably with argumented answers and actual points.

>>8434533
Dumb fuck. Gif pics are not arguments. Learn2discussion

>> No.8434563

>>8434524
>>8434509
>>8434498
>>8434431
>>8434364
>getting trolled this hard

someone screencap this shit

>> No.8434568

>>8434563
Hmm...I don't really see why would you translate their posts into being "trolled".

Is this some of the following trolling?
>Look at me, I'm retarded
>Wow, what a retard.
>Hey,LOL! I was actually just TROLLING!

It makes no sense. It's not stupid. None of you are intelligent enough to post coherent arguments and answers. Only a few guys did.

>> No.8434570

>>8434321
>the whole point of species is to procreate
>It's not like I'm having any kids. Learn what condoms are.

comedy gold right here ladies and gentleman

>> No.8434576

>>8434570
But why is it comedy gold? It's not actually that funny.

Procreation is the whole point of species and that is the reason why we get so much pleasure out of it.

Having kids for me is not logical. They are way too expensive and I see no reasons to keep them.

However, sex still provides pleasure and I realise this is because sex has been the main driving force behind existence of any specie.

What is so funny and illogical about it? Please explain, would be interesting why you consider that to be comedy gold.

>> No.8434583

>>8434568
You need to stop this shit you fucking faggot. I know it's you know's been shitposting in /fa/ the last few weeks. I get it, you find a new board without many trolls and you think "here's my chance" but really you just seem like a fucking idiot.

>> No.8434589
File: 90 KB, 600x1104, this is you .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8434589

>>8434583
>>8434568
>pic related you stupid fuck

>> No.8434600

>>8434583
>You need to stop this shit you fucking faggot.
Why do you call me names? What's the reason. Please explain, would be interesting to know.

> I know it's you know's been shitposting in /fa/ the last few weeks.
I have not honestly. This was my first /fa/ post in 2 years since I last posted. You must be confusing me with someone else.

>I get it, you find a new board without many trolls and you think "here's my chance" but really you just seem like a fucking idiot.
Sorry. I'm not trying to troll just discuss topics I'm interested in. How am I an idiot? Please explain. By definition I am not an idiot. I actually have a master's degree from law school and everything.

>>8434589
Why am I stupid? Yes, that's the image I meant. I did not save it, because I don't save reaction images. I find it pointless to use them, better formulate your own opinion.

Still see no reasonable answers from you. No discussion, no real arguments.

Why do you think people who disagree with the hivemind are automatically trolls? Please tell me why do you believe everyone should have the same stance.

>> No.8434766

2nd from bottom is the only good one.

>> No.8436380

>>8434409
> He would never find me attractive, because I'm flat and have no ass
What's wrong with lolis and tomboys, anon?
Also, fuck that guy.

>> No.8436387

>>8433890
Some of those belts are disgusting because they are too loud and look like something a mexican swag bitch would wear in a club.

The way you type and rationalize dressing like a faggot makes you come off like you have zero taste in women or clothes. I'm sure u r having fun though so it doesn't matter anyways. Just don't think for a second u can dress yourself in the morning, cause u can't.

>> No.8436398

>>8433986
no one wants gucci belts lol thats literally the shittiest item on the menu, especially the ones you picked out. I wouldn't wear it if you gave it to me for free. Gucci has some great clothes but of course you would be attracted to the one thing that fucking sucks.

>> No.8436434

>>8433945
How the fuck are those not small enough?

>> No.8436458

>>8436434
they're not clunky, but they're overly ornamented to the point where they flirt with vulgarity, to put it nicely

>> No.8436461
File: 96 KB, 578x800, Quimper_bag_with_tiesbelts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8436461

why don't you add some color m8

>> No.8436471
File: 98 KB, 960x638, 1497320_278223439007434_923200749_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8436471

>>8436461

or an exotic belt if you're not a poorfag

>> No.8436482
File: 29 KB, 960x638, 1488110_297766587053119_4605893279454438208_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8436482

>>8436471

plated buckles are for retards btw

>> No.8436539

>>8436458
Sorry, but I still don't understand.
They seem small and simple enough. For me, symmetrical = simple.

>> No.8436543

>>8436458
And besides, who the fuck wears their shirt tucked in?

>> No.8436927

>>8434189
unless u r not a human being this is not how u should approach life

>> No.8437200

where can i get a good alligator belt?

>> No.8437214

>>8437200

Depends what your budget is but gator is not cheap from anyone

Santiago Gonzalez is probably the least expensive

Zilli, Stephano Ricci, Galasso and Tom Ford all do great alligator and crocodile belts, but they don't run cheap

>> No.8437303

>>8433890
le epic trole

>> No.8437311

So OP posts a plethora of black belts all of which are not "effay". Can someone please post a picture of a belt that IS then?

I'm interested to see what constitutes good on this board.

>> No.8437447

>>8436387
>Just don't think for a second u can dress yourself in the morning, cause u can't.
But I can. Your views are subjective. Because I don't dress myself in the particular style you fancy, does not mean I can't dress.

>>8436380
>What's wrong with lolis and tomboys, anon?
Low sex appeal, appeals only to nerd neckbeards, because they can't get normal women. Subconscious coping mechanism.

>>8436398
>literally
I don't think you know what that word means. Please list reasons why Gucci belt is so shitty. Would be interesting to hear.

>>8436458
What if your other clothes compliment the particular decor?

>>8436471
Those are brown. Hate brown. Old man color.

>>8436482
>plated buckles are for retards btw
Why is that so? That's your subjective opinion.

Blue belt is too in your face. You go at me for having these big buckles that don't even look that big on my frame, yet post BLUE belts, that just scream "LOOK AT ME". Nice double standards.

>>8436543
If you have a normal height shirt or sweater, it won't go too much over the belt. You don't have to tuck it in.

>>8436927
Who has determined that it is not a way to approach life? What is the correct way to approach life? Please explain the correct way to approach life along with sources for your explanation.

>>8437303
Why am I trolling? Please explain.

>>8437311
I'd also like to see a /fa/ belt, but nobody seems to post neither belts or fits. If you read above you will see I specifically asked to counter arguments with fits. Nobody posted any.

I looked at WAYWT thread and all the fits posted looked like from low T, twink betas that nobody would respect in the real world. These are people that wish they could model like normal white men.