[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 85 KB, 900x647, nike-free-4.0-flyknit-(neo-turquoise-white-brave-blue-volt)-631053-401.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421463 No.8421463 [Reply] [Original]

what would you pair these with? I thought about some general Techwear stuff.

>> No.8421473

bamp

>> No.8421474

>There are actually people on /fa/ who where foam running shoes as if they were casual sneakers

>> No.8421477

>>8421474
>where

>> No.8421489

why would you buy them in such an awful colourway?

>> No.8421491

>>8421489
idk man, I fucked up

>> No.8421641

Gosh l-l-let me take a selfie shirt is navy blue if you can't tell
>selfie.jpg

>> No.8421645
File: 570 KB, 1257x2163, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421645

>>8421641

>> No.8421651

>>8421489
Fuck what this mother fucker says. Throw on some black jeans and whatever shirt color that matches and you'll be good to go.

Colorway is fine, just be confident wearing them, and you'll pick the right combo.

>> No.8421655

>>8421651
thanks man, really wasn't sure. Will wear it with some black/dark grey slim fitted jeans and a white or blue t-shirt.

>> No.8421657

>>8421641
>>8421645
wut.jpg

>> No.8421660

>>8421655
Sounds fuckin perfect man. Maybe even go as far as finding a nice looking comfortable pair of blacks sweats like in the OP photo and rock that shit.

>> No.8421662

>>8421655
that guy is fucking with you. you'll look like a fucking loser wearing coloured runners with jeans.
black runners are the only ones you can get away with.

>> No.8421668

>>8421660
>>8421662
>not sure who's trolling
goddamn I'm too new to this board to tell it apart.

>> No.8421671
File: 52 KB, 400x266, bates[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421671

>>8421662
Not fucking with him at all, sorry. Fuck off with your "earthy tones" bullshit. Loud colors work with any urban-type style.

Hence, why graffiti uses loud colors and shit.

>> No.8421673
File: 161 KB, 1023x685, los-angeles-endless-canvas-bay-area-graffiti-and-street-art-9511[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421673

>>8421668
Have you worn them yet, OP? How do they feel?

>> No.8421674

>>8421668
how often do you see someone wearing blue fucking nikes with jeans.
use your common sense, you'll look like a loser.
>>8421671
is talking legit nonsense. follow his advice if you wanna look like a fucking autist

>> No.8421676
File: 206 KB, 854x1280, Blmn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421676

>>8421662

Not necessarily. It comes down more the general look of the sneaker. Too sporty (like Nike Free) and it wrecks the fit.

>> No.8421678

>>8421674
I said black jeans, you fucking retard. Shit looks fine to me.

>> No.8421681
File: 91 KB, 960x557, pierre-emmanuel-zamane-nike-lunar-flyknit-HTM-trainer[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421681

>>8421678
Picture didn't load, but example of loud colorway runners with jeans.

>> No.8421712

Well I already own them, so I'll wear them. My body is pretty athletic too (coming from /fit/) so sporty shoes won't look too much out of place. And if I combine them with more neutral clothes like black, grey and white I don't think they'll look too bad. Will post a photo of the fit if you want.

>> No.8421718

>>8421678
i said blue nikes with jeans in general you fucking sperg. keep thinking bright nikes with skinny jeans looks good, you fucking loser

>> No.8421721

>>8421718
You're the one shitting on others' style choices, so clearly, you are the bigger "fucking loser" here.

>> No.8421725

>>8421712
idk mayn, if they were another color, maybe, but light blue isn't that great of a color

>> No.8421732

>>8421721
stay blind kiddo.

>> No.8421738

>>8421657
rolleyes.gif

>> No.8421742

>>8421732
>kiddo
Haha, the condescension of this ridiculous statement is purely comical. The fact that you have to project so hard and let everyone know how arrogantly ignorant you are is classic.

Continue to let /fa/ dress you, doesn't bother me at all.

>> No.8421746

>>8421463
techwear in anywhere far from water

>> No.8421752

>>8421742
u're not any different

>> No.8421755

Some what relevant question. Why would Nike put out a shoe called Roshe RUN, if they aren't made for running?

>> No.8421760

>>8421752
I haven't shit on anyone's style at all.

>>8421755
They are made for running.

>> No.8421764

>>8421742
lmao kiddy, why are you getting so angry?
do what you wanna do, you're just gonna look like a fucking retard.

>> No.8421770
File: 41 KB, 449x319, 1325219189686.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421770

>>8421764
Whatever gets you off, man.

>> No.8421804
File: 67 KB, 604x334, Nike1..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421804

>>8421760
That's not with this Nike representative said.

>> No.8421818

>>8421804
That's ridiculous. They're a minimalist free running shoe.

>> No.8421827

>>8421818
no they are not

they suck balls for running and were not meant for it. Roshes were designed to be $60 and appeal to fuccbois. It worked because these fuccbois copped truckloads of Roshes to pair with their nike sweats/hoodie and call themselves "techninja" to feel relevant

Roshes are not meant to be functional for running they were just meant to be cheap

>> No.8421837

>>8421827
You probably don't even know what free running is and why you would need a minimalist shoe for it.

>> No.8421847

Op here, should I change the shoelaces of those >>8421463 to white ones? I think a little more white wouldn't hurt.

>> No.8421858

>>8421837
free running is jumping around abandoned buildings while pretending you are in assasin's creed

and I never said they were a free running shoe

>> No.8421859

>>8421827
Do you know of any Great looking running shoe, that actually hold up as a running shoes?

>> No.8421874

>>8421859
I personally use some saucony shoes that are def not great looking

the Nike Free #.0 running shoes are actually meant for working out; the roshes are just for fashion which is why running in roshes is like running in converse or stan smiths (I mean you *can*, but why?)

>> No.8421875

>>8421474
>where

thanks for the input m8

>> No.8421917

>>8421874
/fa/ should have an actual, running shoe thread. I know most of the time, they have like 4 different colors and weird designs. I think I'm done with the super flexible Nike shoes. I'll pass on any free run model shoe.

>> No.8421923

>>8421917
maybe some new balance minimus?

a m8 of mine has these and they are good for running. I have been looking for a cool pair of running sandals myself since most running shoes look lame

>> No.8423280

>>8421463
an open flame

>> No.8424285

>>8421755
why are 1000 miles not designed to immediately completely break down the moment you walk 1000 miles in them?
why are nike af1s not presidential airplanes made for your feet?
Why are geobaskets not baskets made of dirt?
why are adidas sambas not made for samba dancing?
Why is a ford focus a car and not a lens?
why is the vw golf designed to drive on roads, not golf courses?
why is a rolls royce phantom not an ethereal spirit of the deceased?
why does /fa/ stand for fashion and not shitposting?
what a fucking stupid question

>> No.8424392

>>8421463
the lines are too soft and fluid to work in a techwear fit imo
what made the flyknit lunars work in so many fits despite similarly fluid lines was the harsh white/black/gray coloring imo