[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 58 KB, 720x396, Nani-Natividad-Concepts-x-New-Balance-998-C-Note.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421297 No.8421297[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Old one is at 300... at least I think.

Pic related, cop for £170 ($280) used?

>> No.8421302
File: 106 KB, 640x427, 14045627782_9719d076fe_z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421302

>>8421297
or these instead?

>> No.8421309

>>8421297
wtf they're like 150 squidlets new

>> No.8421316

>>8421309
I know man but they're so fucking rare

>> No.8421373

>>8421297
bump

>> No.8421399

280 is way too much to pay for new balances unless you're rich or incredibly committed to the japanese streetwear aesthetic and everything you wear is cdg and visvim

>> No.8421408

>>8421297
Dnc

>> No.8421431

>>8421297
you're not gonna find them any lower than that. make sure you check the fuck out of the condition and I'd say cop

>> No.8421442
File: 129 KB, 870x1110, image4xxl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421442

grenson finbar
155e from asos y/n

>> No.8421449

>>8421442
They look really strange tbh.

>> No.8421454

>>8421297
i have some used ill sell you for $230

i have a scuff on the gray part

>> No.8421462

>>8421442
Cop for sure!

>> No.8421464
File: 2.31 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421464

Got these timberlands as a gift. Should I keep them or not?

>> No.8421465

>>8421464
yes if you are older than 50

>> No.8421469

>>8421465
so yes?

>> No.8421493

>>8421454
Pics? Ship to UK?

>>8421302
Also what do you guys think of these?

>> No.8421513

>>8421464
nxtlvl

>> No.8421516
File: 132 KB, 640x960, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421516

Cop or nah?

http://www.saturdaysnyc.com/item/crosby-marled-twill

>> No.8421517
File: 1.12 MB, 890x1338, dedralibe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421517

c?
I feel like I'd have to buy one of the raf tshirts (like the so good so many one) in order to make a good fit
Other fit ideas?

>> No.8421535

>>8421517
would you pay full price for that? do you know what to wear with it?

if not don't.

>> No.8421540

>>8421517
from my experience with newer model velcros with holo panels, im gonna say no unless you really love the colorway
those panels gonna scratch and scuff the fuck up

that is one of the nicer colorways this season though

>> No.8421557
File: 67 KB, 600x600, Swoosh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421557

In general are brightly colored Flyknits considered corny as hell?

>> No.8421560
File: 17 KB, 500x500, M20324_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421560

All my other shoes are all black and I am afraid I will fuck the white up so quickly. Could get them for 65euros.

>> No.8421562
File: 236 KB, 658x987, blog__josh_look3_23318_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421562

what do you guys think of this UC bomber?

>> No.8421564
File: 239 KB, 658x987, blog__josh_look3_23319.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421564

>>8421562
that back panel is whats fuckin me up w/it though, if it was the wool pattern all the way through id be sold

>> No.8421604

>>8421454
email in field

>> No.8421605

>>8421560
Stan Smiths look good when beat up.

Cop.

>> No.8421873
File: 285 KB, 975x360, sauconys.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421873

which 2 cop, bullets or jazz low pros

>> No.8421887
File: 213 KB, 620x413, bodega-saucony-grid-9000-pack-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8421887

>>8421873
Neither.

Grid 9000, or Shadows.

>> No.8421893

>>8421442
yes

>> No.8422011
File: 196 KB, 1536x2048, should i cop em?.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422011

thoughts?

>> No.8422101

>>8421562
no

>> No.8422119
File: 45 KB, 480x480, keds-champion-sneakers-white-pic120912.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422119

cup or police?

>> No.8422227

>>8421516
i like it

>> No.8422259
File: 332 KB, 400x728, shirt2_400w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422259

or...

>> No.8422264
File: 231 KB, 400x599, shirt1_400w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422264

>>8422259

>> No.8422271

>>8422259
I think this one

>> No.8422292
File: 146 KB, 870x1110, image1xxl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422292

y/n?

was gonna get an all black bomber next month but I saw this on sale for £30 at asos, worth or not?

>> No.8422297

>>8421557

maybe the usual fly's but chukka's are a bit different imo, just don't wear them like a retard and they definitely wont seem corny

>> No.8422299

>>8422011
c

>> No.8422303

>>8422292
if u like the sleeves, sure
if u don't, dont

>> No.8422308

>>8422292

Cop.

>>8422271

Ty.

>> No.8422538
File: 20 KB, 550x434, visvim-fbt-waxed-2-tone-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422538

1/2

The dude on grailed actually has these for a somewhat reasonable price, retailed for 320.

>> No.8422541
File: 176 KB, 1600x1600, MIDNIGHT-CREEPER-FRONT43 copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422541

>>8422538
2/2

Last one in my size on the Public School website. 438

help me decide

>> No.8422543
File: 84 KB, 750x1500, jhb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422543

Top is just the parka but I couldn't find a better picture of it.

>> No.8422564

>>8422541

Prefer the newer versions that have matte portions.

>> No.8422568
File: 7 KB, 300x300, Creepers-300x300.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422568

>>8422564
I got the wrong image. Yeah, I know what you're talking about. It's the most recent one on the site.

>> No.8422590
File: 167 KB, 640x640, cnote.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422590

>>8421297
>>8421493


I got a pair of vvnds C-Notes, size US 11, for $250. worn like >5 times, box and all laces included. email in field if anyone's interested. located in cali, can work out intl shipping

pic related

/shameless plug

>> No.8422599

>>8421316
they arent worth 280 USD new or used dude. don't fall for the fucking hype and let some gook reseller take your money. they're fucking new balance so they aren't great quiality. you can get way better shoes for that price

>> No.8422611

>>8421540
wtf are you on about? i've worn mine (have that pair and the regular holos) and the panels are perfectly fine. do you fucking scrape your nails as you strap them or something you mongoloid?

>> No.8422632
File: 8 KB, 300x300, img-thing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422632

$135
Cop or not?

>> No.8422633

>>8422632
maybe if youre a girl or a faggot looking to advertise
if you arent either of those, reconsider your life choices m8 and try to determine why your taste is such utter shit

>> No.8422634

>>8422632

Miista build is pretty solid. Not bad for a very "fashiony" sort of slide. Is that the only thing you've been looking at?

>> No.8422638

>>8422633

Miista is a British women's footwear brand.

>> No.8422670

>>8422590
Size 9 US mate :(.
So now that you can't sell them to me, give me your honest opinions on them, why are you selling them anyway?

>> No.8422693

>>8422634
From Miista, yes. like the holographic trend going on now, but I'm worried they'll go out of style soon. The design should be simple and subtle enough though, and I haven't really seen many people with super shiny shoes anyway.

>> No.8422829

>>8422011
yes

>> No.8422848

>>8422693

It's a relatively subtle execution, so think of it more as a "patent" style effect than "holographic" and you might not feel like it's that different.

>> No.8422909

>>8422848
Thanks for the advice

>> No.8422912
File: 64 KB, 640x960, 10415558_537725462998563_3824910310576684783_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422912

Yes?

>> No.8422919
File: 179 KB, 904x1044, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8422919

Got one yes and one no last time

>> No.8422922

>>8422912

You could do better, you could do worse, but that price is pretty decent.

>> No.8422929

>>8422922
Any other recs? Nothing over $250. I really like the silhouette and color. I'm somewhat iffy about the mesh, but I feel like it would be a nice lightweight jacket.

>> No.8422998

>>8422912
cop

>> No.8423054
File: 30 KB, 455x475, rafidas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8423054

for very casual summer fits

>> No.8423163

>>8423054
i like these. where are you considering buying them from? I'm interested in buying a pair as well.

>> No.8423176

>>8422670

they're beautiful shoes and great quality materials, suede texture does not come across thru pictures but they're buttery as hell. I just don't find myself wearing them as much as I thought I would (usually just put them on, admire them as I walk around my house, and then switch into something else) and I'm trying to cut my shoe collection down from like 25~ pairs...

>> No.8423385

>>8422292
cop

>> No.8423386
File: 22 KB, 480x360, frees5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8423386

nike free 5, kind of tech looking
y/n

>> No.8423388

>>8422543
cop

>> No.8423407

>>8422543
w2c shoes

>> No.8423477

>>8421302
W2c those joggers

>> No.8423505
File: 112 KB, 381x442, Screen Shot 2014-06-29 at 11.47.30 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8423505

100 aud

>> No.8423618
File: 293 KB, 636x1417, 41138M038006_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8423618

y-3 grey sweatpants

dunno if i should get these while they're 50% off or go with something like reigning champ or i love ugly

any thoughts?

>> No.8424045

>>8423618
bump

should i get these sweats? $140 instead of $280 retail

>> No.8424102

>>8421297
>>8422543
>>8422538
>>8423505
>>8423618
all this shit is honestly all $10 each at marshalls

>> No.8424104

>>8424102
stay pleb

>> No.8424114

>>8424104
at least im not wearing new balances while living in a cardboard box

>> No.8424236
File: 234 KB, 430x541, mgr.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8424236

Policeman or not?

>> No.8424244

>>8422292
If it's ASOS branded, do not cop.

>> No.8424282
File: 42 KB, 570x313, sophia-chang-puma-disc-blaze-brooklynite-pack-detailed-look-08-570x313.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8424282

pretty keen on these

>> No.8424286

>>8424282
why not cop the Hussein Chalayan versions?

>> No.8424293

>>8424114
if its expensive its good

>> No.8424335

>>8424114
This accurately describes my life. That is sort of depressing. But whatever. I'm fine with it.

>> No.8424644

>>8424244

Is that how bad the quality is? was kinda hoping it'd be at least passable. But if not that's fine there's plenty of other bombers im interested in

>> No.8424648
File: 171 KB, 870x1110, image4xxl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8424648

Hmm?

>> No.8424654

>>8424236
Thinking about copping those too, thoughts?

>> No.8424679
File: 147 KB, 640x960, 1385319507456.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8424679

>>8424236
>>8424654

Are these male shoes? Because I'm seeing them posted all over the place, and in my honest opinion they are some of the most flamboyant shoes I've ever seen. Something you'd see a 5'9" petite gay guy wearing with a BOY t-shirt and either creepers or those sandals? And some acid wash jeans or black skinny, skinny jeans. If you guys like them, by all means get them. But they're really feminine imo.

>pic related of typical wearer

>> No.8424693

>>8424679
Yes, on Dr Marten's official store they're listed as male shoes. I also think they look a little bit too chunky-bulky to be worn by a girl. A straight girl, I mean.

>> No.8424703
File: 172 KB, 640x960, tumblr_n6yqafVvIl1sox1blo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8424703

>>8424693
Definitely male shoes, picture related.

>> No.8424709
File: 128 KB, 1000x1334, 58ZE8bX.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8424709

>>8424693
>>8424703

I'm not seeing it. I'm seeing tumblr-esque post-grunge fuck capitalism/10 shoes when I see these, and the main demographic being for 12-19 year old middle class white women. But w.e, I just think they're are a lot more less effeminate sandals that look nicer.

>> No.8424727

>>8422912
w2c?

>> No.8424732

>>8424703

they look like shit

>> No.8424744

>>8422259
w2c?
(image search didnt help)

>> No.8425006
File: 110 KB, 1200x1200, ucon_accessories_veit-bag_grey_black_1_1_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8425006

its canvas and I guess I could take of the logo thingie

>> No.8425075

bump

>> No.8425127
File: 94 KB, 845x1100, finders keepers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8425127

for a girl? $60

>> No.8425139

New pair of denim or 1 g of a mdma?

>> No.8425175

>>8425006
cop

>> No.8425178

>>8425127
At some angles, they look like bacon.

>> No.8425180

>>8421297
wool bomber? yay or nay?

>> No.8425181
File: 1.62 MB, 3264x2448, upload_2F1404000214999-uyvqvwwh6l102j4i-3a51f431015594e3f53193ad020a72ef_2F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8425181

>>8425180
forgot pic

>> No.8425217

>>8425181
yay

w2c?

>> No.8425246
File: 38 KB, 576x557, shoes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8425246

http://www.schmid.cc/collections/reduceditems/products/berlin-gray coppernaut

>> No.8425264

>>8425246
dc

>> No.8425268

>>8423163
they are on sale on pretty much all the sites (ok-ni, mr portner etc) but only size 10/11 left I think

>> No.8425332

>>8425178
... i don't see it, but thanks for the laugh anon

>> No.8425351

>>8423386
Definately do cop.

>> No.8425510
File: 2.07 MB, 2448x3264, upload_2F1399193819601-im6314hdvi-392e9d927c966fb290542c6b44d32eaf_2F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8425510

>>8421297
c?n?

>> No.8425621

>>8425217
it's apc, im not sure how to pull off a wool bomber rly so i might not

>> No.8426001
File: 29 KB, 455x475, 374382_mrp_fr_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426001

oui ou non?

>> No.8426004

>>8426001
nahhh

>> No.8426019

>>8426004

why?

>> No.8426098

>>8426001
Saint Laurent shoes suck balls quality wise

>> No.8426105

>>8426001
SL shoes look super cool so if you have the disposable income to buy them and not care, go for it

but the leather feels kind of brittle and thin, from the pair I tried on. similar to stan smiths

>> No.8426118
File: 3.35 MB, 2776x1700, jeans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426118

which one do i cop?
i'm more concerned about the quality

>> No.8426125

>>8426001

kek NO
The only patrician Saint Lauren shoe right now are the slip on sneakers.

>> No.8426129

>>8426118
apc

>> No.8426137

>>8426118
Nudie

>> No.8426167
File: 13 KB, 430x576, yn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426167

y/n?

>> No.8426169

>>8426167
n

>> No.8426172

>>8426167
No

>> No.8426180

>>8426118
just get apc new petite standards

>> No.8426195
File: 285 KB, 1000x1000, 11-06-2014_paulsmith_marlzipthroughsweat_grey_1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426195

is this + tee + blue jeans + derbies dadcore?

>> No.8426198

>>8426118
I thought pre-distressed is frowned upon?

>> No.8426213

>>8426195

not dadcore but painfully trendy

>> No.8426216
File: 543 KB, 1500x1500, storm-ii-age[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426216

April77 bomber

>> No.8426219

>>8426213
so you're saying everyone except the faggots at /fa/ will find it appealing?

>> No.8426296

>>8426180
http://www.farfetch.com/shopping/men/apc-petit-new-standard-jeans-item-10715637.aspx?storeid=9495&ffref=lp_3_
these?
but a woman is modelling them, even though it's under men's :(

>> No.8426317

>>8426296
no faggot theres mens and womens versions.

>> No.8426347
File: 48 KB, 500x396, 1398630358396.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426347

>>8421297

cup or nut tho?

>> No.8426361

>>8426347

cop

>> No.8426367

ayy lmao

>> No.8426376
File: 193 KB, 1280x900, sk8s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426376

2 c or not 2 c

>> No.8426391

>>8426376
cop

>> No.8426398
File: 84 KB, 500x333, air-max-93.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426398

do i, or dont i

>> No.8426402

>>8426398
fuck no

>> No.8426406

>>8426402
Okay maybe

>> No.8426410

>>8426376

Cop, then go over the stitching with Sharpie.

>> No.8426425

>>8421297
>>8421302
Why the fuck does anyone think these look good?They all look like the shoes you were when you're 6. Nobody would even differentiate between a $10 and a $200 pair because they all have the same giant N on the side.

>> No.8426445

>>8424709
w3c

>> No.8426447

>>8426425
and by "Nobody" you mean you because you have bad taste
stay mad

>> No.8426454
File: 413 KB, 2000x2000, Atrium_37_0005_9b9bc7fb-f2dc-49a0-9d22-92cfae417f75_2048x2048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426454

To go with this shirt, I'm at a cross roads with three pants in particular and I would like an second opinion, because I like them equally. Will up load the pics in a second.

>> No.8426461
File: 215 KB, 2000x2000, Atrium_16_0021_2aaa34b5-63a6-4954-99c0-5900ce17316a_2048x2048 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426461

>>8426454

>> No.8426473
File: 31 KB, 450x338, lele.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426473

>>8426454
>>8426461

>> No.8426477
File: 251 KB, 2000x2000, Atrium_17_0008_532e7170-9dcc-4020-9338-56634d9a6c74_2048x2048 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426477

>>8426461

>> No.8426481
File: 297 KB, 2000x2000, Atrium_21_0011_2048x2048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426481

>>8426477

>> No.8426492

>>8426447
Seems like you're the retard. When people see the N they think "cool $50 shoes" stop throwing around catch phrases like "bad taste" cluelessly. He's absolutely correct about what others will assume.

>> No.8426502
File: 44 KB, 983x594, image:1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426502

Thing thing vs zanerobe
Remember to cite your sources

>> No.8426515
File: 280 KB, 950x1266, sit2004blk_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426515

boring or kinda cool?

>> No.8426522

>>8426515
MyNanKnittedItForMeCore
Might just be the model, but no

>> No.8426534
File: 14 KB, 265x190, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426534

>>8426447
Guy, when I see that N the first thing to come to mind will always be cheap pleb shoes. No matter how expensive or /fa/ they look.

>> No.8426539

>>8426515
generic. Would cop for half price maybe

>> No.8426544

>>8425127
any opinions on these?

>> No.8426552

>>8426544
dnc

>> No.8426584

>>8426534
>Shoes look incredibly /fa/
>But oh no! They have a NB logo!

>> No.8426588

>>8426534
norse projects has a similar N it uses to brand its clothing

does ur shit opinions similarly extend there

>> No.8426597
File: 194 KB, 1600x1600, zoom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426597

I'm not too sure about them because I've seen some pictures online and i'm not sure if I like the silhouette of them.

>> No.8426625

>>8426588
>>8426584

>implying people will differentiate instantly between NBs and NPs on the streets.

You transcend mere mental retardation. I'm sorry you dropped $250 on $50 shoes.

>> No.8426632
File: 41 KB, 601x800, dsh2014blk_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426632

okay..

THESE

or

>> No.8426639
File: 122 KB, 1200x800, y-3-qasa-all-black-sneakerboy-1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426639

>>8426632
THESE?

>> No.8426650

>>8426597
What are these?

>> No.8426652

>>8426639
qasa

>> No.8426654

>>8426632
>>8426639

If you are asking, cahnces are you don't even have the wardobe to pull them off.
So no, do not cop.
Accept urself and dress accordingly.

>> No.8426662

>>8426650

Adidas Adistar Racer. There was a huge price drop. Should I cop?

>> No.8426677
File: 368 KB, 1504x800, sack+sock.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426677

Both, one, or neither?

>> No.8426678

>>8426216
Any1? I'm interested in it too.

>> No.8426691

>>8426654
im not sure how qasas would fit in but they have that +hype and resell factor

>> No.8426721

>>8426677
socks sure, but the backpack is boring

>> No.8426727

>>8426677
c both. w2c socks?

>> No.8426737
File: 130 KB, 450x300, CIDXKSe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426737

>>8425139

>> No.8426742

>>8426639

These.

>> No.8426747
File: 248 KB, 1000x1000, 11-04-2014_bedwin_anthonyzipuphoodedgauzesweat_blue_1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426747

the color is kind of gay, right? it just looks so comfy.

>> No.8426753

>>8426747
its grey for fucks sake
also who cares about gay, or do you live in a backwards country like the us

>> No.8426761
File: 98 KB, 1000x1000, worn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8426761

>>8426747
It doesn't look that bad. That said, dnc at that price.

>> No.8426765

>>8423386
i think they look dumb as shit. i think the OG's are better

>> No.8426766

>>8426753
it's blue

>> No.8426770

>>8426761
>forcing shit into your wardrobe because it was on sale

pretty gay having some heather baby blue shit

>> No.8426807

>>8426552
why not?

>> No.8426818

>>8426454
>>8426461
>>8426477
>>8426481

Still looking for opinions besides the obvious laughter from 10 year old biracial girls.

>> No.8426826

>>8426807
gaudy, looks like something chinese new money would wear

>> No.8427276

>>8426216
it looks amazing in pics, but I can't say anything about quality, since I've never handled it

>> No.8427363
File: 164 KB, 936x1368, portland-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8427363

>> No.8427374
File: 22 KB, 400x509, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8427374

I don't own any good clothing

Could a rick tee work with just black skinnies and a bomber?

>> No.8427376

>>8427374
>i dont own any good clothing

then fill up your wardrobe with basics instead of copping meme shit

>> No.8427377

>>8427374
Goof^

>> No.8427381

>>8427376
I tried and aa tees look like shit


Trying to find good shit to layer under a bomber

>> No.8427428

>>8427381
the only brands for t shirts you can think of are AA and rick owens?

>> No.8427435

>>8427381
How about this our legacy tee? Are they good?

All I have are said shitty tee shirts and a white. Qlo oxford and a polka do ben sherman oxford

>> No.8427444

>>8427435
Our Legacy is great,

I would also reccomend:
Norse Projects
Reigning Champ
Folk
Acne
APC
Levis Vintage Clothing

>> No.8427574
File: 557 KB, 553x558, Screen Shot 2014-06-21 at 11.19.40 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8427574

w2c this jacket anyone know where? or one similair

>> No.8427598

>>8426296
Obviously it's mislabeled - christ that's a rip off
http://uscheckout.apc.fr/browse.cfm/4,3689.html?nav=men&subnav=jeans

>> No.8427611
File: 115 KB, 383x392, wot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8427611

>>8427574
Are these various anime hairdos?

>> No.8427615

>>8427611
basically yea

>> No.8427642

>>8421517
With a shoe like that, that's very specific, I'd suggest having a number of fits in mind built around that shoe before dropping 6 hundo on them. Those do look cool though.

>>8421557
Looks like an arizona green tea bottle.

>>8421873
dnc

>>8422011
yah

>>8422538
Fuck no son. Come on, you can do better.

>>8423054
The new raf addias are sick, I hate the first batch but these look cool. Not committed to buying them yet though. I'd say cop.

>>8424648
cop

>>8425127
if you're gonna wear just for summery shit, and say white pants/shorts or something, cop. Seems like a good beach shoe.

>>8425510
cop, those are nice

>>8426481
>buying pants with mustard stains on them

Just get APC or something m8

>>8427374
Yeah, that rick is good, but if you don't have the dosh for it, don't buy it. There are cheaper alternatives for layering.

>> No.8427665
File: 445 KB, 1251x2048, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8427665

Ok which two of these shirts should I buy to wear with black jeans and a bomber?

Norse, Ben Sherman, drkshdw, and apc from left to right

>> No.8427737

>>8427574
>https://otakumode.com/shop/534239b8d108d32d64000164

>> No.8427746

>>8427665
Drkshdw and APC

>> No.8427851
File: 52 KB, 384x449, hmprod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8427851

is this goodwill core

>> No.8427870

>>8422119
keds? lel, u a gril?

Go ahead...

>> No.8427871
File: 25 KB, 400x600, 969738025131852od.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8427871

this is five bucks on shopgoodwill.com

cop or not?

>> No.8427880

>>8427871
not

>> No.8427892

>>8426398
fuckin go for it

>> No.8427903

>>8427871
5 bucks to much

>> No.8427904

>>8426662
>Adidas Adistar Racer
I like em.

>> No.8427906

>>8422543
W2C Jacket??

>> No.8427947

>>8422543
w2c Jacket?

>> No.8428063

>>8425181
Fuck yea

>> No.8428084

>>8425217
Apc f/w 2013


They'll probably have something similar this year

>> No.8428183

https://www.ssense.com/men/product/t_by_alexander_wang/black-minimalist-lounge-pants/92966#

I'm a US33 in jeans, do I get a medium or a large?

>> No.8428185

>>8422543
w2c shoes??

>> No.8428219

>>8424236
You already asked, and we told you No.

>> No.8428270
File: 396 KB, 930x620, nike-field-general-free-qs-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8428270

They're on sale $65. Literally deal of a lifetime

>> No.8428277

>>8428270

dude buy like 50 pairs and wait a year and resell for 200 eac

>> No.8428283

>>8428270
w-where?

>> No.8428290

>>8428283
ebay. only a couple of sizes though. like 9,9.5,10.5

>> No.8428338

>>8428270
fuck me, these look dope. does anyone know the sizing on these things?

>> No.8428376

>>8422590
about to sell my 10.5's for 190 bc worn too much,

>> No.8428379
File: 48 KB, 1137x530, bastards.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8428379

>>8421297
Ausfag here.
ive been watching these boots for a while now and while i dont mind spending more money on boots some of /fa/ have told me that red wings arent worth the cost that australians have to pay for them. i went to a the only red wings reseller in my city and said they had a special 875 boots for $345 AUDwhile the australian rrp is $396 AUD. found the same pair on amazon $223 US brilliant!. Go through the process gets converted to AUD slap on bullshit shipping and bam! final cost just over $345 AUD again! (pic related)
Specifically asking for replies from Australians who have bought from red wings. Can i get a better price or should i just cop the $345 Red wings

>> No.8428385

>>8428379
i copped a pair of moc toes ages ago on ebay for $130 shipped new with defects, and repaired them myself. just keep an eye out for a while.

>> No.8428388

>>8428385
What defects were they? How severe?

>> No.8428396

>>8428270
What's the sizing like on these?

>> No.8428404

>>8428338
i heard they're a bit smaller and you should size up .5 I just went with my regular size though since they didnt have 11's

>> No.8428426
File: 836 KB, 2667x1000, Untitled-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8428426

>>8428388
nothing dramatic. the split is inevitable after some wear anyway.

here's a before an after.

>> No.8428434

>>8428404
thanks man
>mfw no 9.5
welp, hope 9 is good enough

>> No.8428443

>>8428426
So you purchasing from ebay is the best way to get value for money? You don't know of any sites that sell redwings to australia close to their american rrps? ebay is fine but id rather not use it if i dont have to just because i don't believe im as covered if something goes wrong with the boot or comes in the wrong colour size etc.

>> No.8428455
File: 43 B, 1x1, s.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8428455

c/n?

>> No.8428459

>>8428379
>99 AUD shipping
that's ridiculous, dnc

>> No.8428460
File: 49 KB, 512x512, s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8428460

>>8428455
sorry wrong image

the one I'm looking at is dark navy, not black.

>> No.8428468

>>8428460
LOL that's a funny hat, and it would be really funny to wear if you worked at a Brekafast restaurant.
Think about if someone asked you for eggs and then you could point to your hat lol. You should start tripping here if you're gonna keep making funny posts.

>> No.8428478

>>8428443
value for your money, yes, ebay is up there. grailed frequently has redwings too. redwingsaustralia.com.au occasionally has certain shoes on sale too.

just find a good local cobbler to sort them if anything goes wrong, dood.

>> No.8428483

>>8428460
w2c

>> No.8428484

>>8426502
thing thing quality and material is gr8
copping in winter (in nz) means you'll probably get really nice thick fabric, it alternates by season

>> No.8429058

>>8421297
Looks like something you would buy for 20$

>> No.8429596

>>8427906
>>8427947
Not completely sure but i think it's the Our Legacy Hazard Parka

>> No.8429674

>>8428183
bump