/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.8339844]

1. Why does /fa/ dress so badly?

2. Sean Connery was skinny pre 1964 and suit's didn't look good on him

3. When Sean Connery had broader shoulders suits looked really good on him

4. /fa/ worships baby faced models

5. /fa/ is too skinny proof is the way connery dresses and the way his body was in 1964 before he got fat was the epitome of style

[Anonymous No.8339855]

I don't think you what a babyface is...

[tinfoil !!gVL0FyzPeMv No.8339862]

what is this picture telling me

is there a narrative here i have no idea what is going on

[Anonymous No.8339886]

>>8339855
he'll never have a masculine face or a man face

he looks like a kid

you guys worship guys that permanently look 16

women want guys that look like sean connery, george lazenby, etc.

not the skinny guys you post

[Anonymous No.8339888]

GUARANTEED REPLIES

[Anonymous No.8339894]

>>8339886
>women want guys that look like sean connery

Ha, no we don't. Believe it or not different people like different things.

[NoTest No.8339939]

>>8339844
Connery was already out of shape by the time he was bond

[NoTest No.8339941]

>>8339939
that said, when he was in shape, he had shit facial aesthetics
(to the point where I wonder if this is a troll image)

[Anonymous No.8339958]

>>8339939
I was talking about 1964 bond that was in shape if you read my post he got FAT after that

you posted 1967 bond

[Anonymous No.8340017]

>>8339939
THIS WHAHT REL WOMYN WAAANT

NOT SKINNY FAGGIT

LOOK, STRONG LIKE BEAR

[Anonymous No.8340076]

>>8339958
ah, my error.
I'm mixing up my films

[Anonymous No.8340175]

/fit/ pls go

[Anonymous No.8340198]

I can't tell if you're retarded, trolling or a retarded troll.

[zachipster No.8340220]

Youre limited to what clothes you can wear if you're too muscular, if you like clothes youre better off being quite slim, no two ways about it. Im a bit torn at the moment, i like how i look with my shirt off, but im too bulky really for all the faggy clothes i like.

[Anonymous No.8340224]

>>8339886
Some poster might not be in it for the pussy, but rather want to self express or just enjoy an aesthetic.

[Anonymous No.8340229]

>>8340220
> too muscular
unless you're roiding, there is no such thing
Bale looks good in his movies, right?
He's on gear.
People who are worried about getting "too big" are people who don't lift.
> even getting into current goslingmode would take a bit of effort - especially to stay so lean

[zachipster No.8340237]

>>8340229
yeah but what if you wanna wear faggy raf tees tho...better off being slim

[Anonymous No.8340243]

>>8340229
What does the natural limits of muscularity look like?

[Anonymous No.8340247]

>>8340243
Natural limit*

[zachipster No.8340249]

>>8340243
Jeff seid??

[Anonymous No.8340263]

>>8340243

probably this. you can look bigger with higher bf% of course

[Anonymous No.8340266]

>>8340229
This whole discussion of aesthetics is funny from a functional perspective. I have pretty much no choice in how I am built. Rock Climbing body is fun.

[zachipster No.8340282]

>>8340263
godtier

this kind of body is way more in now, being too big just isn't cool anymore. Hopefully ill look like this soon

[Anonymous No.8340293]

>>8340282

Its a nice body, good proportions naturally, but its far from impressive.

Needs more bulk for Greek statue mode.

[Anonymous No.8340294]

>>8340282
it's my goal body too, but maintaining that low bf sounds like a pain in the ass. I also have wider hips, but sizewise that seems to be the perfect body now

[Anonymous No.8340299]

>>8340263
for some reason he looks a bit too bulked for me i like it skinier

[Anonymous No.8340357]

>>8340237
buy you can be "slim" and muscular, just go ottermode.
I don't see how having more of a V-shaped torso would ever work against you

>>8340243
see:
>>8340263
this isn't the absolute limit, but unless lifting is your main hobby, this would be very hard to achieve
you could be stronger and bigger, but then you wouldn't be so lean
basically roids (among many other things) allow your body to hold onto a higher ratio of muscle to fat.

>>8340266
I hear that, when I climbed my back was quite juicy, but the rest of me was hungry skelly

>>8340293
greek statue mode is all core and torso, no arms - basically the kind of body you'd get from high-load manual labor

Pic-related is what God-tier genetic potential and single-minded devotion will give you with no roids.

inb4 scooby isn't natty

(sorry to /fit/ up /fa/, but at 26 and married I can't pull off the anorexic college kid look any more, I'm going for jacked-dad mode)

[Anonymous No.8340369]

>>8340263
absolutely perfect. Jealous of his proportions. But I guess finding tops that fit is hard for this guy.

[zachipster No.8340384]

>>8340369
not really, he's not very big, he could wear anything

[Anonymous No.8340398]

This is the ideal model, like you want it OP.

[Anonymous No.8340403]

>>8340369
tailors, dude.
no one should wear clothing off the rack

[Anonymous No.8340424]

>>8340403
what should you get tailored? even t shirts?

never had anything tailored before

[Anonymous No.8340436]

Alec in Miami Blues is not that bad either.

[Anonymous No.8340441]

>>8340403
>>8340424

You're sick.

The only shit worth tailoring are pants/jeans' hems and suits, I guess. Why would you tailor a t-shirt?

[Anonymous No.8340464]

>>8340243
depends on your frame and genetic predisposal

[Anonymous No.8340475]

>>8340424
well, a standard cheap t-shirt is actually woven as a tube, with the top sewn shut and sleeves added.
so unless you are a crazy shape, it probably isn't worth it
that said, there are fitted Ts and baseball Ts that are sewn together to provide a taper
I'm referring to
> polos
> dress shirts
> really any collared shirt with side seams
> blazers
> pants (I'd say don't waste time here, few would notice.)
I have a few cardigans that I had a side stitch put in, and a few with darts (triangles or ellipses sewn in to fit the curve in at the waist.)

pic related is a cheap suit with
> a single dart in the back
> the sides taken in
> the armpits taken up (no idea how they do this, it's magic)
> the buttons realigned (so they would be perfectly straight after the taper)
> some shit with the lapel

the shirt is a cheapo special with
> three darts,
> relocated sleeve buttons
> collar taken in
> side seam taken in

cost - $50 for the suit (Chaps, clearance)
- $15 for the shirt
- $8 to tailor the shirt
- $35 to tailor the jacket (multiple layers, much harder than a shirt)
I don't think it is possible to fit my weird frame any better for $108

[Anonymous No.8340491]

>>8339844
>that pic of connery
>190 to 200 lbs

Yeah fucking right. Maybe 170

[Anonymous No.8340552]

>>8340441
yeah, I forget that t-shirts are a thing, I only wear them around the fire hall (we can only wear either 100% cotton or nomex, and nomex starts smelling bad faaaaaast)
and the t-shirts are free, so I forget about them

My body shape is really strange, I'm 6'4 with monkey arms, a relatively narrow waist, and a very broad chest, so I'm probably a lot quicker to run to a tailor than most.

A standard xl's shoulder seem is in the right location, but my gut needs a medium or else I look like a tent.

I even have my hoodies taken in or else I look like a "potato" according to multiple anons.

> pic is the same suit as above before the tailor (and with shitty lighting)
I think the money was very well spent
The baggy suit made me look fat, trimmed down it shows that I'm lean.

[Anonymous No.8341725]

>>8340475
>>8340552
fuck, it looks like the tailor cut off 20 lbs
also, I'm sorry, but firefighting is not /fa/
pls go