/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.8257098]

Are timberland's /fa/?

[Anonymous No.8257113]

I love tims. they were a construction boot then the nigs took em and now people are appropriatin em back. Ive always been a big fan although not with black like in OPs image. I understand it has black accents but I don't like the look, personally.

Tims are best if you have the frame to rock them (big calves) and I find that they go with looser fitting pants/trousers. light pants if your trying to have a toned down look, dark pants is you sayin look at my tims!!! hhahaha

[Anonymous No.8257114]

not in this picture.

the blakc ones are cool, but not in a fuccboi outfit

[Anonymous No.8257119]

>>8257113
I love that it costs fuck all to customise on their site too

[Anonymous No.8257126]

>>8257098
They're very reliable as far as matching goes but fuck man the one thing that's overlooked: they feel so good to wear. Snow? Rain? Who gives a fuck, these things will protect your delicate feet and still keep you comfortable, and they're not a mission to lace up/down like some boots.

I say this in regard to boots in this style though, not specifically the Timberland brand. If you're spending hundreds of dollars on Timbs when there's a few other brands that make the exact same quality boot but for a fraction of the price, you fuccboid up

[Anonymous No.8257144]

>>8257126


>>8257113
here
>If you're spending hundreds of dollars on Timbs when there's a few other brands that make the exact same quality boot but for a fraction of the price, you fuccboid up
the first thing you gotta change is your mindset. not everyone is a broke nigga.

OP its way better to save up a bit if u gotta and get 1 nice set of boots at least 200 than to be running around in 3 pairs of janky boots

[Anonymous No.8257149]

>>8257144
Isn't that the case with everything? quality > quantity always

[Anonymous No.8257153]

>>8257126
What are some timb alternatives?

[Anonymous No.8257158]

>>8257098
yes

[Anonymous No.8257195]

I actually own two pair of timberland boots but i never wear them. mine don't have that black part at the top.

[Anonymous No.8257220]

>>8257098
only if you area nigger

[Anonymous No.8257246]

>>8257144
>>8257149
That's the thing tho, you're not sacrificing quality. Literally the only difference is the brand stamped on them. Timbs are just the ones that made it into the whiteboy/girl mainstream and a lot of people consider them to be of higher quality for that reason. You change your mindset rich nigga, most expensive =/= best

>>8257153
Off the top of my head I can only think of Herman Survivors, but Idek if they still make them cos the ones I own were made in the late 80s. There's substitutes out there, I just don't wanna vouch for them and then be wrong. Google should sort you though, and if they still do do them, my Hermans are amazing. Like I said, lasted since the 80s and they're still in perfect condition, wear them a minimum of twice a week these days.

[INTUOS !!220TURcuQD9 No.8257281]

>>8257098
Wheat colorway is for coons.
Get all black if you're white.

[Anonymous No.8257300]

>>8257126
Timberlands aren't even that expensive you fucking poorfag. For the build quality they're great. Why buy lookalikes when you could buy the real deal for under $200?
If you actually wear your Timbs and don't just wear them once, you'll get your $200 worth in no time.
Damn, I've spent more money on fucking Nike sneakers.

[Anonymous No.8257306]

>>8257300
Omg you faggots and your insecurities

They're not lookalikes

They're the real deal too

You can get the same quality from these other brands

You are literally only paying for the timberland logo

They're the exact same fucking shoes

What is so hard to understand

[Anonymous No.8257315]

>>8257306
>Exact same fucking shoes
So they're made in the Timberland factories are they? Timberland just decides not to brand half of them?

If they're not made in the same factory from the same materials then they are not the "same fucking shoes". You don't pay for the brand. These aren't sneakers we're talking about. Timbs are sturdy as all fuck and the build quality is solid.
"Paying for the brand" is a typical poorfag phrase. Save up if you need to.

[Anonymous No.8257324]

>>8257281
they look pretty emo/scene tho

[Anonymous No.8257325]

>>8257098
yea no

[INTUOS !!220TURcuQD9 No.8257341]

>>8257324
All depends on how you wear them. They're far too big and chunky to be emo in my opinion.

[Anonymous No.8257349]

>>8257315
>"Paying for the brand" is a typical poorfag phrase
quid of a $300 Rick Viscose tee

[Anonymous No.8257362]

What about these?

[Anonymous No.8257367]

>>8257281
holy fuck beauty. i always related the original colour scheme for timbs as black people. considering getting a pair now

[Anonymous No.8257409]

>>8257098
They're nigger/construction worker tier

[Anonymous No.8257414]

>>8257315
Jesus christ. This is some /v/-tier ignorance. Just cos Timberland didn't make them doesn't mean they're different. They look identical, so the only thing that could be worse on the other shoes is build quality. The build quality is the same (If not better, as I said, I've had mine since 1988/1989) so they're the same. Fucking. Shoes. Just accept that you got ripped off, pretty much no one is going to care, they're just gonna see the Timbs logo and think you're swaggy as "mah nigga".

[Anonymous No.8258081]

Timbs nigga

[Anonymous No.8258414]

>>8258081
w2c bag

[Anonymous No.8259757]

>>8257098
No. Not at all. Unless your work with manual labor, doing real mens work, don't wear these boots, you'll look like a goddamn fool.

And don't bother trying to rationalize while wearing it is acceptable. Just keep scrolling because there is no context in which it is acceptable to wear these boots as a fashion statement.

[Anonymous No.8259785]

>>8258081

>Michael Kohrs

lmaooo

[Anonymous No.8259855]

dnc unless you are either A: an actual manual laborer or B: a swagapino in head-to-toe supreme