WATCHES: POST EM HERE YOU DUMB FUCKS

[Anonymous No.8252864]

Old one nearing 300 and as good as dead

[Anonymous No.8252868]

>>8252864
looks alot like this one

[Anonymous No.8252883]

>>8252868
>retard

[Anonymous No.8253003]

saving up for this one

[Anonymous No.8253230]

>WATCHES: POST EM HERE YOU DUMB FUCKS
I would love to, but I dont like being shouted at, so please, ask nicely!

[Anonymous No.8253267]

I saw this >>8250608, but Tommy Hilfiger watches are all too big (40mm is the largest that still looks OK on my wrist), Swatch watches are too big, I looked at Parnis but all their watches are too big as well, what to get that looks nice (to other people, myself I couldn't care less) <200$?

[Anonymous No.8253314]

sploosh

[Anonymous No.8253370]

breitling cockpit b-50

[Anonymous No.8253550]

>>8252864
Am I the only one that thinks APs are almost universally disgusting? The octogon bezels. The screws. Shitty looking bracelets. The ugly dial textures. As far as I can tell, they're only popular because they're a status symbol.

[Anonymous No.8253595]

>>8253550
2 rite m8

[Anonymous No.8253657]

>>8253595
So what would go with this description "I'm a relatively poor college student who needed a watch but couldn't break the bank, but also don't want to be a pleb" ?

[Anonymous No.8253670]

>>8253657
vintage soviet mechanical

[Anonymous No.8253674]

>>8253657
In all seriousness, a Japanese mechanical. Anything but an SNK809. See Orient and Seiko. Consider Citizen as well. Nobody can beat Japanese watches in the sub-$300 range.

Do you know what style of watch you want? I can probably recommend some specific models.

[Anonymous No.8253684]

>>8253674
To be honest I know fuck all about watches, but I usually dress monochrome most of the time, occasionally prep, so I guess something versatile?

[Anonymous No.8253707]

this was seriously on the casio website for the calculator watches

i've never been so disgusted

[Anonymous No.8253709]

>>8253674
>SNK809

what's wrong with Seiko 5s?

[Anonymous No.8253720]

>>8253595
>modern quartz analog

that hit too close to home

[Anonymous No.8253800]

>>8252883
They were both designed by Genta, you jackass.

[Anonymous No.8253851]

>>8253550
>Am I the only one
No. Almost 8 billion peeps on this planet. You almost definitely not the only one

Autism disengaged haha. I'm going to have to disagree with you bud; I had never even heard of AP until I reverse image searched that pic because I thought it was b-yootiful

[Anonymous No.8253853]

>>8253230
back 3 reddit pls

[Anonymous No.8253898]

Why does everyone recommend mechanical watches for people on a budget? I'm well-aware of the beauty of the mechanism and I love machines and engineering, but in a watch it's needlessly expensive, less reliable, and less accurate. The only practical advantage is that it could be repaired a century from now while a quartz movement might not, but no one's going to spend hundreds of dollars to fix your cheap Russian watch in 2105.

If you're just spending $200 on a watch might as well go quartz/solar/whatever. Back when I was wearing a $50 Casio dive watch I got lots of compliments and never had to set it more than twice a year.

[Anonymous No.8254147]

>>8253898
compliments on a casio diver? wut?

[Anonymous No.8254156]

>>8254147

I got a lot of "nice watch" or "what's that watch?" when I was wearing it. Even had an old Russian guy offer to buy it from me until I told him it was a $50 watch.

[Anonymous No.8254172]

hello /fa/, I need your advice
I need a cheap watch as an everyday beater, it has to be max €200, steel bracelet, black dial, and max 40mm of diameter
I was thinking of copping a citizen eco drive, would it be a nice choice?

[Anonymous No.8254458]

HELP ME /FA/

Which one for daily wear?

And I know the drill, fuck fashion watches, but which one looks better?

black: http://www.amazon.com/Tommy-Hilfiger-1790683-Sport-Stainless/dp/B002LAR7D0/

brown: http://www.amazon.com/Tommy-Hilfiger-1790684-Sport-Stainless/dp/B002LAR7DA/

[Anonymous No.8254468]

>>8254458
forgot pic

[Anonymous No.8254477]

>>8252868
I've got one as a present for getting into my first choice Uni (St. Andrews). It costed my dad about £22k ($36k) so I can't wait to flaunt it around Uni.

[Anonymous No.8254742]

>>8254468
>>8254458
there isnt a link for the brown one, but black for daily

[Anonymous No.8254920]

>>8253709
Seiko 5s are great, there's like 200 different models. That particular one is played the fuck out because it's baby's first mechanical and the very cheapest one. If you spend an extra $30 you can get one much more versatile.

It's just too small to be a military style watch. I don't mind wearing a 37mm dress watch, but for a military watch, I want it to be at least 40mm.

[Anonymous No.8254937]

Nixon Private SS. I've had mine for about two years now and it's still looking sharp. Surprisingly hard to cause noticeable scratches except on the latch. I would recommend.

[Anonymous No.8255448]

>>8254742
Anyone else? Please?

[Anonymous No.8255971]

[Anonymous No.8256005]

There is JLC, and there is everything else. True story.

[Anonymous No.8256027]

>>8254172
bump

[Anonymous No.8256053]

i'm a total newfag to watches
could someone please recommend me a nice simple watch?
i'm thinking something with a white face and black leather straps

maybe something like the vintage swiss mechanical in this picture?
>>8253595

[Anonymous No.8256079]

>>8255971
I was getting ready to ask this in this thread. But, is NIXON a good brand? I've seen there products tons before and I can say I love the look and style. Plus they are cheap in comparison. Anyone know of the build quality and how fa they are?

[Anonymous No.8256087]

>>8254147
Love that g shock I have one coming from japan atm

[Anonymous No.8256093]

>>8256079
I posted the Private SS earlier. I've had three NIXONs: The Private SS, The Player, and The Quatro(I think that was the model name...), and would recommend all three of them. Great craftsmanship, none of them stopped on me. The Private SS is my favorite, however.

[Anonymous No.8256700]

>>8256079
Own a few nixon watches. Some gaudy (gold) some plain. All are bulletproof and tough as fuck but and better made then any other surf brand I have ever picked up.

[Anonymous No.8257157]

>>8254477
You'll get laid much more @uni if you go for the "I don't give a fuck"-look, I mean sporty and super laid back (not computer tech type, you still ought to have perfect hygiene and clean everything). Bitches who will notice things like watches won't put out anyway.

[Anonymous No.8257182]

I love my Seiko Spirit, running at COSC standards right out of the box. Only problem with it is, that I really want a Grand Seiko now.

Still can't decide, whether to go with the high accuracy quartz or the hi-beat. The hi-beat has the sweeping hands (obviously spring drive would be even better, but I'm scared of getting it serviced properly), but I don't particularly enjoy setting my watch every other week. So I'm somewhat leaning towards the HAQ movement.

>pic related, it's my SARB033 right now

[Anonymous No.8257185]

>>8254147
how do you black out the lcd?

[Anonymous No.8257201]

>>8256079
Nixon is overpriced as fuck and not in a good way - at least for me.

See with Luxury watches, you at least get the best finishing possible and while overpaying, there is just nothing better.

With Nixon, you pay for the brand. You get decent movements, but the same are found in much much cheaper watches. You get good detail on their more expensive ones, but nothing fancy. What Nixon is, is a fashion brand really, which unlike real fashion watches at least have the feature of being rugged.

[Anonymous No.8257337]

again

[Anonymous No.8257348]

>>8257337
why is cartier on third level ? their watch movements suck

[Anonymous No.8257386]

>>8257348
Also it's completely disregarding Japanese watches, take Credor for example, which are in every way better than Rolex or IWC for example.

[Anonymous No.8257419]

>>8257386
I don't even know how they could forget a company that makes watches worth half a million USD. You could get a whole Rolex collection for a single Credor Minute Repeater

[Anonymous No.8257457]

>>8257419

because credor is not a brand. its a seiko model.

[Anonymous No.8257470]

>>8257457
lol of course it's a brand. You won't find the word Seiko anywhere on those watches.

Omega is to Swatch, the very same as Credor to Seiko and Omega made the list.

[Anonymous No.8257482]

>>8257457
also there are numerous models and not a model.
They have many different Men's and Women's models, starting at around 3k-4k.

Also please read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand
Even if it was named Seiko Credor and they only had a single model, Credor would still be very much a brand.

[Anonymous No.8257486]

Simple and elegant

[Anonymous No.8257487]

>>8257337
So much wrong with this picture
>IWC higher than A. Lange
>Rolex in top tier
>Cartier in second top tier. HAHAHA
>Bvlgari even getting a mention
>No Hamilton instead of Tissot

Make a new one. now.


>>8257386
>>8257419
>>8257470

>japanese. LOL.

>>8257337
So much wrong with this picture

[Anonymous No.8257493]

>>8257486
old man watch. dont get me wrong, elegant for sure, but if you're below 50 you shuldnt be wearing a watch in that design WITH numerals too.

[Anonymous No.8257508]

>>8257487
>japanese. LOL.

Please explain how you don't give a shit about movements far exceeding anything on the second tier.

[Anonymous No.8257609]

>>8257470

>you wont find the word seiko anywhere

[Anonymous No.8257635]

>>8257609
Yes because with that you have clearly proven me wrong.

It doesn't matter for my argument of Credor being a brand anyway, as I've said the very next post.

[Anonymous No.8257668]

>>8257635

but you dont see swatch branding omega or blancpain movements

[Anonymous No.8257677]

>>8253595
Would one of you expert horologists mind schooling me on the identification and buying of vintage (especially vintage European) watches?

[Anonymous No.8257692]

>>8257668
well that's because Seiko produces tons of watches that are above 1k USD such as Seiko Brightz or Seiko Astron. Additionally they have their Grand Seikos between 3k and 8k USD, which are already on the level of a Omega. Credor is even a step beyond that and it's essentially using modified Grand Seiko movements.

With Swatch you only have very basic watches and Omega has really nothing in common with that. If Omega used Grand Swatch movements, there would probably be Swatch on them somewhere as well, since there wouldn't be as much of an image problem, if there were higher end Swatches.

And the example for me still holds true because the Swatch Group makes most of their profits not from Omega, just like Seiko makes most of the money off cheap entry level watches as well. They both created a luxury brand to differentiate those products only Seiko's starts off in a much higher segment.

[Anonymous No.8257699]

can anyone identify the panerai model number for this watch? made it 2001 (year designation D) and one of 7000 of this type made based on info on the back.

[Anonymous No.8257833]

>>8257699

to be precise its a gyrotourbillon. watch this and you will get a boner

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQJTGPtYtqA

[Anonymous No.8258303]

>>8257699

It's a fake.

Give me a clear picture of the back.

[Anonymous No.8258797]

>>8252864
10/10

>>8253003
Ugly as sin, please kll yourself

>>8253267
>parnis
lol

>>8253314
Nice

>>8253370
Are you new-money?

>>8253595
b8

>>8254147
Nice tool collection, would look great with a bit of wear

>>8254156
That casio quartz looks interesting

>>8254468
Fucking cunt

>>8254477
You've posted the same stupid upside down picture in every thread. I would hazard a guess that your dad just asked the jewellers for a prestigious watch because he has pleb taste himself. Now his son has received it and is actually tasteless enough to think one can "flaunt" a patek.

>>8257182
>scared of getting it serviced.
Get what sings to you, don't think "oh i'll buy a luxury watch but be a nigger about getting it serviced". I think you'll appreciate the spring drive a lot more.

>>8257337
pls redo this.

>>8257486
>so le classy
you would have been better of buying a vintage. At least you have a good taste in preferring more traditional restrained styles.

[Anonymous No.8259037]

>>8253595
Where can I get something like the Rolex Explorer as a poor person?

I mean with a clean face and no numbering except for some/all of the hours.

[Anonymous No.8259218]

>>8257833
how much does this cost?
I want to feel poor

[Anonymous No.8259239]

>>8254477
sigh this faggot again

[Anonymous No.8259278]

>>8253595
Eat it.

[Anonymous No.8260485]

>>8259218

i think the JLC gyrotourbillon start at 400K - 500K$

[Anonymous No.8260539]

got this as a present from a girl at work who has a crush on me, what do you think?

[Anonymous No.8260553]

keeping it simple

[Anonymous No.8260568]

Grandpa gave me this today along with some decorations.

[Anonymous No.8261315]

>>8257699
Panera 048

[Anonymous No.8261328]

I must have this watch

[Anonymous No.8261330]

>>8252864
>watch thread
*tips fedora*

[Anonymous No.8261340]

>>8254147
tell me about the middle watch

I'm thinking of getting one for daily use because its tough and low maintenance, and relatively sleek

[Anonymous No.8261365]

>>8261330
*tips supras as the lunch bell rings*

[Anonymous No.8261389]

My watch and my sunglasses.

[Anonymous No.8261395]

>>8253370
i used to like brietlings when i was 16

[Anonymous No.8261417]

>>8261395
Nothing wrong with Breitlings. Their Superquartz movement is fantastic.

[Anonymous No.8261424]

>>8261417
>nothing wrong with breitling

Sure. If you don't have taste.

[Anonymous No.8261432]

>>8261417
>Superquartz movement
>nothing moves
>its a quartz
I bet you think ETA with a slapped on rotor qualifies as "in house"

[Anonymous No.8261448]

>>8261389
>luxottica glasses

your "prada" glasses are made the same place they make tommy hilfiger branded glasses
oh wow luxury

[Anonymous No.8261455]

>>8261389
>"made in italy" glasses

lel

[Anonymous No.8261468]

>>8261448
>>8261455
I went to one of the largest luxury brand sunglass shops in Copenhagen, and I tried everything in every price range from $2500 down to $200. There is basically zero difference in built quality once you get over $300. The rest is brand hype.

Does not matter if the glasses are "in house" or "hand made". It's all the same.

So I bought my Prada glasses because they looked the best and they seemed pretty sturdy.

I really don't see what you are on about.

[Anonymous No.8261475]

>>8261389
>oh look a sea-dweller thats nic-
>"designer" sunglasses
>shitty ugly as fuck table

I can't decide whether the table is uglier or the glasses. I think the table wins it though. Next time just take a photo of the watch on your wrist and spare us the eyesore.

[Anonymous No.8261489]

>>8261475
What's wrong with my table?

It's danish oak to which I applied a green-gray wax coating.

Also, since everyone is shitting on my sunglasses, what would you recommend?

[Anonymous No.8261497]

>>8261489
not him, table is fine.

but everything else in your room reaks of /g/ fedora.

[Anonymous No.8261515]

>>8261497
>/g/ fedora

What does this even mean?

>drums *fedora*
>computer *fedora*
>mechanical keyboard *fedora*
>expensive headphones *fedora*
>alcohol collection *fedora*
>custom Thonet office chair *fedora*

Shit, I don't even frequent /g/, but spouting fedora indiscriminately is just fucking stupid.

[Anonymous No.8261517]

>>8261515
confirmed for fedora

[Anonymous No.8261518]

>>8261517
Sure.

[Anonymous No.8261525]

>>8261489
Salt Optics

[Anonymous No.8261526]

>>8253657
Seagull 1963

[Anonymous No.8261533]

>>8261515
hahah fucking fedora faggot,hows living in your mom attic?

[Anonymous No.8261536]

>>8261489
Oh wow.
This is like looking at a picture of a girl with a hideous face, and then zooming out to see the rest of her hideous bloated corpse.
>table looks like it was stolen from a local park
>disgusting green/grey shade of table
>matching shade of chair
>chair material is creased from fat ass
>ricer build in plexiglass case
>overpriced headphones with a stand that does not match the table colour
>shitty valve poster in the background
>shitty drum kit in the background
>bottles arranged in a gratuitous and juvenile manner to deliberately draw attention to them
>antenna looks out of place on the table
>is that a fucking razer mouse

And yes I am the guy you were replying to, your taste is shit. Expensive, but fucking shit. Next time you start throwing the price of things around to justify your shit taste, please just stop.

[Anonymous No.8261543]

>>8261533
No, it's my house.

>>8261536
I haven't thrown around the price of anything.

It seems as you are doing an awful lot of projecting. Your criticisms are unfounded and quite juvenile.
And no, I don't use Razer products.

And not to fan the flame, but can I see your computer setup, or hobby-room? I would very much like to get some inspiration on how to improve my own.

[Anonymous No.8261547]

>>8261525
What makes them so special?

[Anonymous No.8261548]

>>8261489
for the sunglasses? idk, made in japan shit like matsuda i guess. thom browne has good shit too

[Anonymous No.8261551]

>>8261489
l4d2 poster? really?

wtf man

[Anonymous No.8261556]

>>8261547
small independent company. extremely high quality products. all of my optometrist friends swear by and only use salt products themselves. If you want amazing glasses I always hear about Salt and Maui Jim. If you want to not look like an old man you don't get Maui Jim. They also laugh about people that buy Raybans because they mark them up so much, same with all the Luxottica products actually...

[Anonymous No.8261559]

>>8261543

>criticisms are unfounded and juvenile
Everything criticised can be clearly seen in the picture.

>projection
For someone moaning about the meaning of the word fedora, you don't seem to know the meanings of the words you yourself use.

>can I see your computer setup?
Saw this coming before I even pressed send, mostly because individuals who base their self worth on something extrinsic will get defensive at the first sign of criticism and attempt to start measuring dicks, rather than consider the validity of the criticisms.

Accept your shit taste and move on, friend

[Anonymous No.8261565]

>>8261489
Not bad. What do you do and how do you do it money-wise?

[Anonymous No.8261572]

>>8261548
I tried some Thom Browne has the same build quality as anything from Luxottica. Even their $1800 glasses. Pure brand hype.

I have not tried anything from Matsuda. What makes them any different?

>>8261551
I was given it as a gift from my younger brother, so I put it up in my hobby room. I figured why not? It's a fun game.

>>8261556
I have a few pairs of Maui Jim already. Great glasses. I will take a look at Salt next time I am in Jutland. Thanks for the tip.

>>8261559
Come on now. No reason to be this hostile. I don't have to view my own taste as shit just because some angry person told me so. Get off your high horse.

>>8261565
I am a tech-adviser for a small extremely high end luxury goods company based in Switzerland and Copenhagen. I am quite good at my job, and I do a lot for the company, so they reward me with a generous salary.
Also, I am very sorry for apparently hijacking this thread. That was not my intention.

[Anonymous No.8261579]

>>8261432
Did you just read from #menswear that "gentlemen wear only mechanical watches" and then proceeded to order your first Orient or Seiko 5 ? Maybe you even splurged and bought a German mall watch with bulk ETA2824 inside?

There's nothing fundamentally wrong with quartz. And I'm talking purely from "fashion" or emotional/heritage/prestige perspective. From functional and objective point of view they are in fact far superior to mechanical in every way imaginable so I'm not even bringing that up.

[Anonymous No.8261590]

>>8261559
shut up you faggot

[Anonymous No.8261592]

>>8261536
I agree with this
No style to be seen for miles

[Anonymous No.8261596]

>>8261489
That looks like a Crate & Barrel dining table.

As for sunglasses, there is almost no difference between Prada and Ray Ban, other than the name stamped on it.

[Anonymous No.8261598]

>>8261579
the quartz second movement looks horrible. reason enough

[Anonymous No.8261601]

>>8261559
BTFO

[Anonymous No.8261604]

>>8261596
It built the table myself.

As for the sunglasses, I already stated they were bought based on looks and feel. Nothing else.

They feel sturdy and they look good on my face.

>>8261601
Sure.

[Anonymous No.8261605]

>>8261536
>>8261592
>>8261592
>>8261596
The room looks nice, the floors are nice, the table is actually dope.

It's only that ridiculous workstation that screams 18-year-old Mountain Dew-laden neckbeard.

[Anonymous No.8261606]

>>8261579
I concur that high accuracy quartz movements are awesome, yet the Breitling Superquartz with +-15s/year pales in comparison to Grand Seiko or The Citizen HAQ movements (especially the latter).

But of all three of them only the Grand Seiko has a movement that doesn't look like garbage.

[Anonymous No.8261612]

>>8261579
>#menswear
>"gentlemen wear only mechanical watches"
I don't know what the first thing is and never implied the second thing. Seems like I touched a nerve for you to pull all that out of your ass.

I've got nothing against quartz and appreciate Grand Seikos and the like. But the fact is that Breitlings look like ass and you are paying premium for a well marketed quartz movement.
The fact that you assume that anybody who criticises you wears budget mechanical watches is sad indeed, grow up buddy.

[Anonymous No.8261615]

>>8261605
Well, to be honest, I did purchase that computer case and cable kit around 8 years ago when that was all the rage. I've upgraded everything but the cables and case since then.

It's sorta become an in-joke with my friends, so I don't really want to get rid of it, gaudy as it is.

[Anonymous No.8261617]

Thinking of getting this watch for quite cheap, will be my first watch purchase and I'm not looking to spend too much money as I'm a poor as fuck student.

Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.8261621]

>>8261617
Not bad.

[Anonymous No.8261636]

>>8261389
>OhGodpleaselethemaskaboutmytableandmyglassesandmyheadphonespleaseplease

[Anonymous No.8261643]

>>8261606
AFAIK Breitling quartzes are -+10 per year. How much less leeway they have in practice is way different thing. You might have SQ that runs +6 per year, and Citizen Chronoaster with A660 that runs -+5 (they are rated for that, as the most accurate quartz movement out there). Point being they are both great movements.

>>8261612
Maybe in your initial watch you should have bitched about something else than only about the fact that the watch was quartz.

[Anonymous No.8261650]

>>8261643
>Maybe in your initial watch
in your initial post*

Läl

[Anonymous No.8261661]

>>8261636
shut up punk, go be poorfag somewhere else

[Anonymous No.8261663]

>>8261621
No Lume sucks though

>>8261636
not him, but you seem sort of jelly. Also that was probably what he intended, still fuck you for writing something without any sort of orthography, but spelling.

>>8261643
well but both have better ways of dealing with temperature variances than the Breitling, imho.
Anyhow my main point only was that the movements look like ass.

[Anonymous No.8261672]

>>8261636
You know, sometimes you just might overthink things a little bit.

[Anonymous No.8261679]

>>8261663
>that the movements look like ass.
That is definitely true. Not disagreeing, but not seeing how this would matter for a person who buys watch like say Emergency or Chronospace. Worth mentioning that IMHO display backs are gaudy in ANY watch.

[Anonymous No.8261681]

>>8261643
>Maybe in your initial watch you should have bitched about something else than only about the fact that the watch was quartz.
Lel
Are you actually retarded?
I was mocking the fact that you thought that the quartz movement in the Breitling was something special.
>inb4 muh thermocompensation

[Anonymous No.8261692]

>>8258797
>That casio quartz looks interesting

It is interesting. So interesting that I sold it for $80 after wearing two years when I paid $42 for it brand new.

For some reason the Citizen doesn't get as much attention even though it's a nicer watch.

[Anonymous No.8261693]

Just bought pic related off eBay for $15 to wear at work. Will be exposed to carpentry and welding. Think it will hold up? (Assuming it works to begin with)

[Anonymous No.8261711]

>>8261681
>I was mocking the fact that you thought that the quartz movement in the Breitling was something special.

The fuck, "something special"? It's a incredibly reliable plus accurate quartz movement. What's not to like? It's what it tries to be and what people who buy watch like that want it to be.

[Anonymous No.8261714]

>>8261692
I think its because
>people normally associate casio with digital watches, not divers
>that looks like a domed crystal, either because it is domed or because of the shape of the bezel
>the design cues for it are less derivative than the citizen (but to be fair, all divers watches are derivative).
>it has a vintage vibe to it for some reason

Do you remember the model number?

[Anonymous No.8261722]

>>8261679
>Worth mentioning that IMHO display backs are gaudy in ANY watch.

Well, sure, but in a $3000+ watch, I want everything to be perfect and not just the part you can see, while wearing it.

>>8261714
>>that looks like a domed crystal, either because it is domed or because of the shape of the bezel

That's not a sapphire crystal. It's a normal domed mineral glass you can also find in $80 swiss watches. Just look at it and look at the citizen next to it.

[Anonymous No.8261735]

>>8261722
>I want everything to be perfect
That makes sense when we talk about mechanical watches, which are fundamentally only an fashion accessory made in sake of heritage (what I mean is mechanical watches would be obsolete if they existed only for functionality). When talking about quartz watches I see no point in decorating the movement, it's there only to keep time and nothing else.

[Anonymous No.8261739]

>>8261722
My bad, I'm too used to calling it domed crystals after drooling over steinharts OVM

[Anonymous No.8261755]

>>8261735
Not him, but if thats your qualification for the relevance of mechanical watches then surely trying to improve quartz time keeping for the sake of a few second here or there counts as an exercise in self-indulgence. The functionality argument is a difficult one to make since people do not need a HAQ any more than they need the heritage of a mechanical. It comes down to subjective preference.

[Anonymous No.8261769]

>>8261735
I think we will have to agree to disagree on that, dude. I would feel ripped off, with a movement like that.

You have a good point with the function over decoration, but if you really just wanted pin point accurate time, why are you getting a HAQ movement for multiple thousands of dollars, when a $150 radio watch will be more accurate after 2 months of setting the HAQ.

You do it because the technology is awesome (that it can keep the time autonomously) and obviously for the perfect finishing, but then don't pretend it's not a fashion accessory as well.

[Anonymous No.8261803]

What do you think about this one, guys?

http://www.bruviktime.com/#!/bruvik-svalbard/svalbard-automatic-signature-dial

[Anonymous No.8261808]

>>8261803
Don't know. I would have to see it on a wrist.

[Anonymous No.8261810]

This is my current watch.

Omega Geneve from 1974.

[Anonymous No.8261812]

>>8261489
don't listen to the haters m8, some people will get mad because your values don't line up with theirs and cannot understand why you would rather spend your money on headphones than sunglasses. Anyways I recognize your setup from the battlestation threads on /g/. Still mirin dat table. where did you get the plans to build it?


Pic is my watch. Pretty entry level I know, but I don't think I'm ever going to upgrade it.

[Anonymous No.8261816]

>>8261808
Like this?

[Anonymous No.8261817]

>>8261714

The crystal is domed, and that's one of the reasons I sold it. Got scratched because it stuck out so much and it was hard to read in bright sunlight. It used to be the favorite cheap diver on watch sites. MDV-102.

The Citizen is too plain for my tastes but I couldn't find a new vintage-look quartz diver with more flair. Like some of the old quartz Seikos have have a great look. Pic related.

[Anonymous No.8261819]

>>8261468
>Buying luxuries in Copenhagen
Well that's your own fault.

[Anonymous No.8261821]

>>8261812
I usually don't take much from 4chan seriously, but I appreciate your kind words.

I drew up the plans myself, along with my cousin.

>>8261819
I live there. Its that, or online.

[Anonymous No.8261825]

>>8261816
Too big and a little ugly.

[Anonymous No.8261828]

>>8261489
Your headphones are literally blocking the taskbar of your screen to the left.
Your purposely put it there for the photo, amirite?

[Anonymous No.8261830]

>>8261828
No, they are always there. I am tall enough to see the taskbar at all time.

[Anonymous No.8261835]

>>8261830
*times

[Anonymous No.8261838]

>>8261812
If your phone and your camera is on the table.. what are you using to take the photo with?

[Anonymous No.8261840]

>>8261810
One of the nicest watches I've seen in this thread.

[Anonymous No.8261850]

>>8261838
The camera on the table actually took the picture with an elaborate setup of mirrors.

[Anonymous No.8261851]

>>8261850
Black magic, ain't gotta explain shit.

[Anonymous No.8261878]

>>8261489
Generally like it.. A shame that your computer is an abomination, though.

[Anonymous No.8261886]

>>8261878
I know.

[Anonymous No.8261902]

>>8261850
He took the picture with each and shooped the phone into the original picture it took after taking a picture of it with a camera.

[Anonymous No.8261911]

>>8261886
You should have bought a small plain black case. My brodude friends all built them with leds fucking everywhere and were confused when I made mine plain.

[Anonymous No.8261917]

>>8261911
I've had several other cases, but this one is the most practical.

[Anonymous No.8261954]

>>8261917
>Practical
yeah, no

[Anonymous No.8261961]

>>8261954
What do you know about the case?

[Anonymous No.8262034]

>>8261489

>Ikea floor protector

lord of beta

[Anonymous No.8262040]

>>8262034
I don't want my expensive floor to be permanently scuffed.

[Anonymous No.8262061]

>>8262040

Do you also use a pocket protector, and put plastic sleeves on your couches?

Also that's hardly an expensive floor, and if after a few years you don't like the scuffs you can get it sanded anyway.

A floor protector is amongst the saddest things.

[Anonymous No.8262073]

Come on /fa/, let me have it
1/2

[Anonymous No.8262075]

>>8262061
You don't know how what my floor is made of, or how expensive it was. I can't get it sanded.

[Anonymous No.8262093]

>>8262075

It's not Macassar Ebony nor laid in a herringbone pattern, it´s just beams so it´s not expensive. And you can sand any wood flooring.

[Anonymous No.8262101]

>>8262093
No, because I have rubber inserts, which is what the black lines are. The wood is white oak.

What do you classify as expensive flooring?

[Anonymous No.8262109]

2/2

[Anonymous No.8262110]

>>8262040
Do you also use screen protectors?
Otherwise you're being a hypocrite.

Always found it retarded to buy something expensive, then to destroy it with something cheap and disgusting for the sake of not distroying the expensive thing.

[Anonymous No.8262115]

I have a couple vintage wittenhauers are they considered /fa/

[Anonymous No.8262117]

>>8262110
No I don't use screen protectors. The mat is not covering the entire floor. Just the part where my chair is.

[Anonymous No.8262120]

>>8262073
>>8262109
i cant see shit get a new camera

[Anonymous No.8262129]

>>8262061

You ever see what plastic office chair wheels can do to a wood floor? I ended up with a pine floor that was completely destroyed after a few years. Proper office furniture companies actually tell you to use soft rubber wheels on wood floors but good luck finding a normal chair with those.

Floor protectors are the only way to go on wood floors if you have a roller chair. It's not like a plastic sleeve on a couch--it's like eating off a plate instead of the tablecloth.

[Anonymous No.8262147]

>>8262101

What I said, Macassar Ebony or flooring laid in a herringbone pattern.

And rubber inserts are an old trick to make slabs of wood that aren't properly planed give the illusion of fitting well together. (not even joking) Also peel them out before sanding, not that that floor is worth sanding. considering the price tag.

>>8262110
This.

>>8262129
I've had my herringbone floor sanded once now because I roll around with my Eames with hard wheels because I don't give a fuck.

A floor should be used, not cared for as if it's something delicate, and those floor protectors completely ruin the look of any room.

[Anonymous No.8262154]

>>8262147
What a condescending asshole you are.

[Anonymous No.8262157]

damn so many fedora-core watches here :/ just keep it simple man

[Anonymous No.8262162]

>>8262157
That's ugly as shit.

[Anonymous No.8262193]

>>8262154

Did I step on your black Yesstyle trenchcoat?

If you find that condescending you might as well kill yourself, because the big bad world out there is much harsher than I am.

[Anonymous No.8262221]

>>8262193
Oh wow you really see yourself as some real-life reminder? How fucking pathetic you are.

You were being a dick. I told you that you were being a dick. Now you say: "Such is life".

All over me taking care of my floor.

Does it make you feel better to have a mental image of a fedora-wearing trenchcoat edgemaster as someone who you can act superior to on the internet? Does it make your dick grow?

Whatever you need to get through the day and uphold your superiority complex.

>he has a floor protector
>he must be this sheltered little nerd who knows nothing about "the big bad world"
>I'll teach him about sanding and how his floor is shit and worse than my own

Christ. Get out of your own colon.

[Bolt-Action Chopsticks !!ogHwB92GknK No.8262233]

[Anonymous No.8262241]

>>8262157
how is having a giant b&w eye on your wrist keepin it simple? you wouldn't be hanging out with me, that's for sure.

[Anonymous No.8262252]

>>8262241
wel it obviously simpler than these:

>>8262109
>>8261817
>>8261816
>>8261803
>>8261328
>>8260485
>>8259278

[Anonymous No.8262294]

>>8262252
simple=/=good

[Anonymous No.8262300]

>>8260568
actually p cool
thank u gramps

[Anonymous No.8262355]

>>8262154
>>8262221

>posts stupid room for everyone to critique
>hurr durr do you know how expensive my floor is?
>gets rustled when someone who clearly has more of a clue about tasteful expensive home furniture points out what a dunce he is

Top lel, whats the matter m8? Mad that you can't pass the guy's criticisms off as juvenile because he actually demonstrated he knows what hes talking about? Just call him a condescending asshole, that'll work!

[Anonymous No.8262361]

>>8262355

[Anonymous No.8262363]

>>8262361
>is clearly butthurt
>posts image accusing others of being butthurt
Nice to see your polite, well-cultured facade fall apart under scrutiny.

[Anonymous No.8262368]

>>8262363
That's not me.

[Anonymous No.8262377]

>>8262368
Not that you'd have anything more redeeming to say in your response either way.

[Anonymous No.8262389]

What are some /fa/ watches for going /out/? Hiking, camping, that kind of stuff

[Anonymous No.8262390]

>>8262377
I wasn't going to give a response. You clearly can't deal with opposing opinions on an adult level, so I don't want to delve further into it.

[Anonymous No.8262395]

>>8262389
Rolex Explorer.

[Anonymous No.8262409]

>>8262390
First of all, I wasn't the person who called you out on your shit.
Secondly, you were the one who threw a tantrum at the other guy and started calling him an asshole.
So theres no point in pretending that you are above it all and can engage in a discourse like a mature adult, because your posts have proven otherwise.

[Anonymous No.8262412]

>>8262409
He was condescending, and I called him out on it. I would do that in person as well.

I don't appreciate it.

I wouldn't call that a tantrum.

[Anonymous No.8262426]

"Terrorist" reporting.

[Anonymous No.8262432]

>>8262147

You might want to take off that fedora, my euphoric bro.

[Anonymous No.8262439]

>>8262412
>I wouldn't call that a tantrum.

>>8262221
You were upset enough to write all that, I would say that an e-tantrum.

Also nothing condescending was said until you called him an asshole, before that all I saw was genuine comparison between what he viewed as an expensive floor and your not-that-expensive floor. Is any opinion that disagrees with yours condescending?

[Anonymous No.8262440]

>>8262409
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.

[Anonymous No.8262441]

>>8262426
I always associated those Casios with my uncle, because he's worn one for like 20 years straight.

lugless master race reporting in

[Anonymous No.8262447]

>>8262441
With the 10 year battery life I wouldnt be surprised if he used the same watch for a long ass time lol.

[Anonymous No.8262459]

>>8262439
He told me that my floor was not expensive, which I think it was, and therefore told me that it shouldn't be sanded because it wasn't worth it. He also told me to not use a mat because the floor can be sanded and-

fuck it. I don't give a shit anymore. Think what you want. I honestly don't care any more. Let's get back to talking watches.

>lol you gave up so i was right all along
Whatever makes you happy.

[Anonymous No.8262466]

>>8261840
Thanks, man.

[Anonymous No.8262481]

>>8262395
>Rolex Explorer
>explorer in name
>fuck it
>outdoor watch now

[Anonymous No.8262485]

>>8262459
Boo hoo he told you your floor isn't expensive.
Expense is relative. Your sea dweller is a cheap ass piece of shit for someone who owns a Lange or a Patek. For someone who owns a Seiko diver it may be a grail watch.
If someone wearing a Patek came up to me during a discussion about watches and said he thought my sub was cheap and unrefined, I would respect his opinion, not call him condescending.

[Anonymous No.8262495]

>>8262485
He would be condescending in that case. A person owning a Lange or a Patek should be able to appreciate a solid Rolex. Hell, I own a Patek and I love Rolex.

Also, herringbone flooring is ugly as shit.

[Anonymous No.8262504]

>>8262495
>herringbone flooring is ugly as shit
>What is opinions

[Anonymous No.8262505]

I hope I don't offend Anon again with my Russian watches.

[Anonymous No.8262511]

>>8262504
Exactly. This fucking entire derailing of the thread is all about opinions.

[Anonymous No.8262515]

my daily driver

[Anonymous No.8262518]

>>8262495
But a Rolex IS cheap and unrefined compared to a Patek, that is objective fact. Just like how some woods are more expensive than others. If someone were to shit talk my rolex out of the context of a watch discussion then i would call that condescending. However if we're on the topic of watches (or floors) then the opinion is valid. Therefore you have no "condescension" to complain about.

[Anonymous No.8262521]

>>8262515
You should drive that off the pier.

[Anonymous No.8262526]

>>8262521
Amen.

[Anonymous No.8262539]

>>8262521
its okay if you're under the age of 30

[Anonymous No.8262541]

>>8262518
I don't give a shit if he has better floor than I do. It's the tone in the fucking posts which bother the shit out of me.

If I had THE most expensive floor in the world, which was also the prettiest and most perfect in every way, that would not give me the moral right to talk shit about every other floor I see.

I have a fucking Patek 5970 in white gold, and I love to have a chat with a dude wearing a Heuer Monaco or a Speedmaster.

If I told him his watches were shit compared to my own, then that would be rude and inappropriate.

[Anonymous No.8262545]

>>8261389

woah rolex and prada u must be rich ;)

[Anonymous No.8262546]

>>8262539
>under the IQ of 30
Fixed

[Anonymous No.8262547]

>>8262545
;^D

[Anonymous No.8262559]

>>8262546
top bant from this guy ^

[Anonymous No.8262561]

>>8262539
Sorry man, it's not.

[Anonymous No.8262573]

>>8262541
>tone
So the real cause of your grief is someones tone on an anonymous image board?

>moral right to talk shit about every floor I see
Of course it wouldn't, but the guy was using his moral right to express his opinion when comparing his floor to yours. I don't see what there is to be mad about.

>rude and inappropriate
Yep, I agree. But if they offered their watch for a comparison then you could point out the difference in price and quality. It would not be shit-talking, it would be an honest comparison.

[Anonymous No.8262576]

>>8262573
Which this wasn't.

[Anonymous No.8262586]

>>8262541
>Patek 5970

Pictures of Patek right now.

[Anonymous No.8262592]

>>8262586
It's in my bank vault. I only wear it a few times a year. I promise to take pictures next time I have it out of my deposit box.

[Anonymous No.8262593]

A thread about watches degraded into fighting about floors and trolls. This is why trolling /fa/ is too easy. Come the fuck on guys and get back on topic.

[Anonymous No.8262594]

>>8262573
>pulling the old "lol you got mad over something on an anonymous imageboard"

I'm not even him but that was the fucking dumbest thing you could possibly have said.

[Anonymous No.8262596]

>>8262592
>An already rich guy having to lie about being rich
This is pathetic.

[Anonymous No.8262599]

>>8262592

Then you don't own one.

[Anonymous No.8262601]

>>8262596
>>8262599
ok.

Sometime in the next few months I'll have a timestamped photo. Nothing else I can do at this point.

[Anonymous No.8262606]

>>8262576
You posted a picture of your room, so everything in it was fair game for discussion and critique. Since you apparently post on /g/, this should be obvious.

>>8262594
Hush child, the grown ups are talking.

[Anonymous No.8262617]

>>8262606
Now who's condescending when critiqued?

:^D

[Anonymous No.8262623]

>>8253707
Your just butthurt you cant be Casio Databank master race.

[Anonymous No.8262625]

>>8262617
>condescending when critiqued
It wasn't about being condescending in response to criticism, it was being upset about condescending criticism.
Is this misunderstanding a result of poor reading comprehension or grasping at straws?

[Anonymous No.8262627]

>>8262601

>hurr I own a 100K Patek!

pics please!

>Hurr no, it's in my safe, maybe in a few months time!

And you have no other picture off of it?

Calling BS on this one.

[Anonymous No.8262628]

>>8262625
Probably. This is an anonymous imageboard after all.

[Anonymous No.8262634]

>>8262627
This.
Why would there be no picture of a watch that is a crown in any watch collection

[Anonymous No.8262646]

>>8262627
Just wait.

>>8262634
I don't usually photograph my very expensive stuff. Only semi-expensive.

[Anonymous No.8262650]

>>8262628
I know you're trying to be clever by using a variation of a phrase used earlier, but it makes no sense in this context.
Thanks for trying.

[Anonymous No.8262654]

>>8262650
Trying is all that really matters.

[Anonymous No.8262667]

>>8262650
>Having money enough for a rolex
>Doesn't support Mootles by buying 4chan pass

Well shit.
Why don't you have a pass?

[Anonymous No.8262679]

>>8262654
Yes, like trying to be flippant about ones shortcomings.

[Anonymous No.8262684]

>>8262679
I don't know what flippant means.

[Anonymous No.8262691]

>>8262667
I don't post nearly enough to warrant buying one.
Although I am now considering it after typing the captcha wrong three times.

[Anonymous No.8262692]

>>8262684
You could have typed it into your search bar ten times in the time it took you to post that.
Unless you are being flippant about your flippancy.

[Anonymous No.8262693]

>>8262691
>I don't post nearly enough to warrant buying one
You really ought to buy one, though, for the sake of keeping the community alive.
Moot is being a faggot who won't take donations, even though he deserves it.

[Anonymous No.8262698]

>>8262693
That is a very fair point. It would be worth not seeing a captcha again too.

[Anonymous No.8262802]

>>8262691
>I don't post nearly enough to warrant buying one.

sorry that made me laugh, you've been posting your battlestation on /g/ literally every other day for years now.

[Anonymous No.8262895]

>>8254477

St Andrews University is full of shit people who you really shouldn't worry about trying to impress. The majority are clueless fucks who have been brought up living in a bubble

Also, the DJ at the lizard (most popular "club" you'll find in St Andrews) is a tranny. He wears police hats and leather skirts.

[Anonymous No.8262904]

>>8262802
I'm not the guy who posted a sea-dweller and his room m8. My rolex is a sub and I was asking that guy why he was butthurt about having his floor critiqued.
Out of curiosity, does he get shit on /g/ like he did here?

[Anonymous No.8262912]

>>8262895
You should have gathered by the style of his post (and the fact that he's posted the same thing the umpteenth time) that he is one of the clueless fucks you are referring to.

[Anonymous No.8262917]

>>8261821

Since you seem to have the cash for it, I recommend you look into Cartier for sunglasses.

Uk they cost around £450 upwards, but they are definitely a step up from typical department store designer sunglasses. They are all made by the same brand which makes ray ban, and while I appreciate you're paying for a label, you may as well do it properly.

[Anonymous No.8262925]

>>8262912

Yea I was going to bracket that in after the bubble part, but I thought I'd try and be slightly nice first. That was probably dumb tho, he does seem like he would fit right in.

"Look what daddy bought me"

[Anonymous No.8262932]

>>8262541
>Patek 5970 in white gold

No offence but that is one of the uglier watches in the PP line up. The dial is ridiculously busy for a dress watch and the watch screams "I am a tasteless nouveau riche!"
Sell it and buy a more discerning and elegant PP.

[Anonymous No.8262993]

Any recommendation of Swiss entry brands such as Swatch or Mondaine?

[Anonymous No.8264603]

>>8260553
I got myself that one for work, and I've come to like it enough to wear outside of work as well.

[Anonymous No.8264713]

>>8262904
no, most battlestations are a lot worse and while his is pretty rice it gets mostly ignored, especially since he posts it really every other day.

I really don't like his setup though, 120hz over QHD with TN over IPS, his case is a rice-cube, his cable management awful, the position of the desk is also very questionable, just like the headphones just standing there in the middle and I have no idea why he can't afford a cupboard for his beverages. Also notice that tacky L4D picture.

It's sad really considering how much money he spent (I like the desk though, it looks stunning and is far superior to my not desk, (which is well crafted but looks too industrial) and the only thing next to the floor I envy him a little for.

[Anonymous No.8264733]

>>8253595
Where can I get a vintage german mechanical?

[Anonymous No.8264756]

>>8264713
Yeah I agree with everything you just said. If someone in their late teens had a set-up like that I would be somewhat impressed. However he is a well-paid professional so having man-child paraphernalia clash with good quality furniture just comes off amusing, and its the amusement at his expense that derailed the thread.
Who knows, maybe the rest of his house is a bit more tasteful.

[Anonymous No.8264846]

>>8262802
I haven't posted on /g/ for weeks. Either someone else is posting pretending to be me, or you are misremembering.

[Anonymous No.8264850]

>>8264733
Chrono24

[Anonymous No.8264926]

>>8254477
EVERY FUCKING THREAD, FUCK OFF YOU POSH PIECE OF SHIT

[Anonymous No.8264938]

>>8254477
>upside down photo

erry time

[Anonymous No.8264947]

>>8252864
humiliate me. taking orders mache alles

[Anonymous No.8264966]

My qt.

[Anonymous No.8265158]

Tid No. 1

[Anonymous No.8265573]

>>8261455
srsly, please enlighten me.

how to get a real quaility eyewear. does it matter to get made in italy, made in japan, handmade in italy eyewear?

[Anonymous No.8265991]

>>8254156

WHY DID THESE HAVE TO BE DISCONTINUED?!

IS THERE ANYWHERE I CAN BUY ONE?

Seriously, this looks so much nicer than the MDV106 and the only 102 I found was some jerkoff on eBay selling his for $200.

What do?

[Anonymous No.8265994]

>>8265158
Jesus m8 how thin is your wrist

[Anonymous No.8266284]

>>8265573
You get good eyewear by only buying Maui Jim, Mykita, Matsuda or L.G.R.

[Anonymous No.8266347]

>>8266284
why is that?

and why made in italy eyewear you find in any optics doesnt mean shit?

[Anonymous No.8266412]

Master Race

[Anonymous No.8267024]

>>8266412
what's the point of spending $10,000+ on such a boring, simple 3-hander with a plain white dial? there are literally thousands of watches with similar, if not better, designs... and you don't have to baby them because they don't cost $10,000.

craftsmanship of the movement isn't a justification, as long as it's within COSC accuracy it could be made of plastic for all i care

[Anonymous No.8267401]

>>8261448
As opposed to what? Most other labels are under umbrella companies like Safilo or Marchon. Do you exclusively buy glasses from smaller companies, or are you trying to convince yourself you made the right move by getting walmart shades

[Anonymous No.8267415]

>>8267024

a $5 digital watch is more accurate than is required for a COSC. all watch value is subjective and personal preference.

[Anonymous No.8267526]

Any reqs for a watch in the $150-$350 range, very small wrist, 20yo male, casual environment?

Or advice on what / what not to look for in a watch for someone with those characteristics?

[Anonymous No.8267566]

>>8261489
valka is that you???

[Anonymous No.8267587]

>>8261489

Did you buy a monitor specifically for 4chan browsing?

[Anonymous No.8267625]

>>8267566
No.

>>8267587
No.

[Anonymous No.8267634]

>>8267526
Seiko 5, Hamilton Khaki, Citizen Eco-Drive
≤ 40mm

[Anonymous No.8267636]

>>8254477

St Andrews University

Patek

'Costed'

En serio weon?

[Anonymous No.8267685]

>>8267634

Opinion on this one?

[Anonymous No.8267895]

>>8267685
A bit dressy but that's up to you.

[Anonymous No.8267914]

>>8267024
Shut the fuck up
>boohoo so expensive i didn't want one anyway! It's boring! Why doesn't it have 10 sub-dials and 7 hands?!
You are a pleb with a case of sour grapes and poor taste.

>>8266412
>master race
>only has one picture to post repeatedly in every thread
Is shitposting one picture of a patek a new maymay?

[Anonymous No.8267943]

>>8267914
>Shut the fuck up
You sound more upset than him.

[Anonymous No.8267948]

Casio's F-91W is often used by terrorists due to its nature of being exploitable for bomb manufacture and cheap price.

But, is it /fa/?

[Anonymous No.8267949]

>>8267943
>you more mad so you wrong

You sure are a moron, aren't you?

[Anonymous No.8268088]

>>8267948
Yes, but I can go one better again

[Anonymous No.8268151]

>>8266412

what model is this? never seen a model like this in the patek range

it supposed to be a calatrava but never seen a face like this so i call fage

[Anonymous No.8268421]

>>8261572
actually defending yourself on /fa/

cute lmao

[Anonymous No.8268496]

>>8268421
>lmao

[Anonymous No.8268503]

Mine

[Anonymous No.8268509]

>>8268503
>carbon

[Anonymous No.8268640]

>>8266412
fuck! this fugly as hell. seriously just buy Timex if you cant2taste.

stop posting same pic over and over faggot! bet you sold it and now you only have pic to brag about lmao

[Anonymous No.8268642]

what is the best watch for a poor fag ?

[Anonymous No.8268654]

>>8268642
Nothing.

[Anonymous No.8268878]

>>8254172

My recommendation for a steel, black dial, tough eco-drive beater is the BM6400. It's right in your price range and has a good reputation. The European model one can be bought on a steel bracelet. The American comes on canvas and it took me a while to find the bracelet.

Only downside is I believe the diameter is 41mm.

[Anonymous No.8268964]

>>8262505
>Anon

[Anonymous No.8269041]

>>8268503
10/10 would hire as an accountant

Just copped

[Anonymous No.8269073]

>>8269041
nice Bahnhofsuhr

[Σ▼ƦƟ/ƒ▲/Ğ No.8269127]

>>8269073
kek

[Anonymous No.8269209]

>>8268642
Timex, Casio, the new Swatch.

[Anonymous No.8269304]

>>8268642
Timex Weekenders are reliable, attractive, and well-priced. I had one for six years before I bought my first nicer Swiss piece, and that was just dick-wagging because of finishing college at the time, my old watch is still perfectly functional.

[Anonymous No.8269370]

>>8268878

would cop but its a bit too small

[Anonymous No.8270971]

This is my current watch, but it's really bulky and heavy- leaves a huge mark on my wrist if I wear it with my motorcycle gloves.

Any suggestions for an automatic that will hold up but not break the bank?

[Anonymous No.8270979]

>>8270971
image didn't post

[Anonymous No.8271076]

What are some Seiko/Orient mods I could do to my Orient Mako to make it less boring.

[Anonymous No.8271781]

>N1
>Vostok Europe

Why do I like a watch that's named after a failed rocket programme?

[sieg heil No.8271794]

>>8271076
leave it as is

[Anonymous No.8272172]

hm does this one cost irl? not ebay/store price.

[Anonymous No.8272175]

[Anonymous No.8272279]

>>8272172
>Invicta
Don't