[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 70 KB, 467x700, 1368648852654.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8236081 No.8236081[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

i got an invite to the adidas employee store, is there anything worth fucking with? I've never had any drive to fuck with adidas, it always seems like nike beat them in just about every category, so some suggestions would be appreciated. pic not really related

>> No.8236089

adidas > nike

nerd

>> No.8236094

>>8236081
some adidas originals stuff is alright. I got some black pants from there and the quality is really damn nice, were $200 and marked down to $60. 36" inseam too on a 30" waist. hard to find from pleb brands

>> No.8236096

>>8236089
i disagree, but you got some suggestions that might make me think otherwise?

>> No.8236109

>>8236096
adidas has better to choose from

i can't think of good nike shoes besides af1's and maybe some new running ones if you are into tech

>> No.8236113

Do they stock collabs?

>> No.8236116

>>8236089
tend to agree with this guy although nike gets more hype. I like some of the boost sneakers. They look better than most of the nikes I've seen in person

>> No.8236125

Shell toe>AF1
Pro model> blazers
Samoa>Cortez

Jeremy Scott, Rick Owens, raf Simons, and now Kanye. Yeah. I'm going with Adidas.

>> No.8236136
File: 39 KB, 600x400, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8236136

>>8236125

What about Stan smiths vs these?

And what does Adidas have that fucks with air max?

>> No.8236137

>>8236113
that's what i'm wondering. if they do i'm going all out.

>> No.8236143

>>8236136
the swoop ruins it

>> No.8236152

>>8236143
I agree the three stripe air holes of the Stan smiths was a brilliant balance of branding and minimalism.

>> No.8236157

>>8236152
not to mention functionality

my feet feel so much more aired out

>> No.8236161

>>8236143
The swoop saves it actually.

>> No.8236166

>>8236161
>hypebeast

Too each their own.

The nike owner wants everyone to know he's wearing nikes. Look guise I'm a nike guy.

The Adidas owner likes being set apart. Having people ask "hey what are those I like em".

>> No.8236168

>>8236161
you are wroungg

>> No.8236175

>>8236166
Nikes are like the most common shoe on the planet. No one gives a shit if you're wearing them

To me the nike swoosh in an excellent design. Nothing to raelly do with branding or anything,

Imagine Blazers or AF1 without the swoosh. It wouldn't be the same. The swoosh is incorporated into the designs.

People don't really buy nikes to show off, they buy it for the design.

>> No.8236182

>>8236168
While I think he's wrong as well. The bent out of line stripes stitching would look really awkward without the swoosh. So in that sense it kinda saves it. But it would look better without a bent stripe and a swoosh. Oh that sounds like the Stan smiths lol

>> No.8236194

>>8236182
you are right

>> No.8236195

>>8236175
Somewhat agree

Agree on the earlier shoes. Although to many it is about branding.

Disagree about af1s might even look better w/out swoosh. Agree with blazers tho.

Strongly disagree. Most fuccboi a and hypebeasts buy nikes just to show off they are a safe shoe.

>> No.8236198

>>8236166
>hurr durr im so modest for wearing these crappy trainers that might be a little more downplayed than the alternative.
listen to yourselves.

>> No.8236211

>>8236195
THINGS WE BUY TO COVER UP WHAT'S INSIDE

>> No.8236213
File: 200 KB, 1280x1222, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8236213

>>8236198
But your forgetting the og point. Stan smiths just look better. Also I think your point stands more for people opting for CP's.

>> No.8236226

>>8236213
adidas and cps are for faggots

nike for real niggas

>> No.8236236

>>8236166
whoa dude nothing sets u apart like mass produced chinese factory sneakers

one time i saw a dude wearing shoes by the second biggest sportswear company and i was like "damn nigga what are those best shoe i ever see 10/10 w2c", ofc not recognizing prominent triple stripe branding on the side being that its the logo of a small, underground company ive never heard of

>> No.8236246

>>8236236
shouts out trunks stacks on deck m8

shoes on ur mind and u never stop u headed to the top of the shoe city

boss of shoes leading the way 100 shoes a day young trunks who u be?

u got 10 shoes u got 10 sneakers

big black ones small white ones u got em all every1 blowin' kisses 2 u

>> No.8236258

What do you guys tihnk of this shoe?

>> No.8236259

>>8236236
u are right

>> No.8236262
File: 427 KB, 900x900, B5FU2PPC01_PM2_Front view.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8236262

>>8236258
Forgot picture

>> No.8236267
File: 49 KB, 698x417, Louis-Vuitton-2014-SS-Mens-Shoes-Fuselage-Sneaker-Boot-e1388860358636.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8236267

>>8236262
How about this?

>> No.8236268

>>8236166
See
>>8236236
He has a point you know

>> No.8236274

>>8236267
>>8236262
fucking terrible

>> No.8236275

>>8236262
this aint bad

>> No.8236276

>>8236236
Lol. I'm the guy who's comment youre making fun of and I laughed. Whatever point remains. Adidas better than nike.

>> No.8236279
File: 93 KB, 600x587, rick-ovens.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8236279

>>8236274
Better than this shit

>> No.8236282

>>8236262
Ok. It's branding done better. Subtle. Nike would have a big fat black swoosh on the shoe. And people would love it.

>> No.8236283

>>8236274
It's the best shoe posted in thread actually

>> No.8236286

>>8236279

meant to quote
>>8236283

>> No.8236287

>>8236262
>>8236267
Get AF1's instead

>> No.8236293

>>8236286
Actually no. That's a fucking clown shoe.

>> No.8236296
File: 29 KB, 570x400, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8236296

>>8236279
No. That shoe is fucking art.

And so is this pic related

>> No.8236299

>>8236296
>No. That shoe is fucking art.

lmao. You /fa/ hypebeasts are hilarious.

>> No.8236304

>>8236296
Just because Rick Owens put his name on it doesn't mean it looks good.

>> No.8236311

>>8236296
>>8236279
>>8236267
>>8236262
Get AF1's instead

>> No.8236321

>>8236304
yes it literally does

>> No.8236338

>>8236321
lmao are you trolling or something?

No way in fuck this shoe looks good>>8236296

You are only praising it because it's designed by dick ovens.

Look at this guy >>8231513
He's by no means fashionable.

He's got some interesting designs here and there though.

>> No.8236371

>>8236311
This

>> No.8236375

>>8236338
Get AF1's instead

>> No.8236379

Fuck af1's get she'll toes

>> No.8236425

>>8236213
stan smiths a shit
nike a shit
stan smith is one of the shittiest adidas shoes ever idk y so many ppl here jerk themselves to it

>> No.8236433
File: 89 KB, 980x679, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8236433

>>8236299
>>8236279
You need to see the shoe in a black back drop. These shows are for the man of the night. The night owl. At the bar or the club. These aren't for a day at the park. 2deep4u

>> No.8236448

Maybe a nice Originals jacket

>> No.8236520

>>8236081
does anybody know the shoes/parka?

>> No.8236530

>>8236520
bless
raf simons

u wont find them anytime soon