[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 367 KB, 2048x1536, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197380 No.8197380 [Reply] [Original]

Can we get a minimalist inspo going.

>> No.8197384

>>8197380
Bump

>> No.8197401

On other boards, you would have been required to post at least 5 images to start.

Maybe you should try that next time, instead of expecting us to do your bitch work.

>> No.8197416
File: 16 KB, 390x260, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197416

>>8197401

>> No.8197425

>>8197380
thats not minimalist

>> No.8197429

>>8197425
What is it then

>> No.8197434
File: 71 KB, 390x284, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197434

>>8197416

>> No.8197437
File: 267 KB, 930x1400, 1396212246555.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197437

inb4 jeans and t shirt fits

>> No.8197440
File: 52 KB, 390x520, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197440

>>8197434

>> No.8197444
File: 92 KB, 580x799, 1395412748042.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197444

>>8197437
dem rafs

>> No.8197446

>>8197437
Dope

>> No.8197450

>>8197429
lets try this a different way
y do u think its minimalist?

>> No.8197452
File: 205 KB, 960x866, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197452

>>8197444

>> No.8197457

>>8197450
Not sure, im pleb asf (1 yr& 2 months now). Just liked it and thought it looked simple or minimalist. I prefer all the other fits being posted though.

>> No.8197459
File: 66 KB, 364x520, 20100828_04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197459

i have posted this so much

<4

>> No.8197463

>>8197459
I like everything but the scarf.

>> No.8197468
File: 88 KB, 672x960, 1379233004230.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197468

>>8197459
hmmm......not sure if minimalist tho

>> No.8197471

>>8197468
Ehh

>> No.8197472

>>8197459
how the fuck is that minimalist

>> No.8197473

>>8197457
haha dw
im def no expert myself but
some anon showed me the following and they helped me make a bit more sense out of the term
http://the-rosenrot.com/2013/08/defining-minimalism-in-fashion.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shibui
its p interesting

>> No.8197482

>>8197473
thanks bro

>> No.8197485

>>8197468
How do I activate Cult Priest mode?

>> No.8197489

worst 2014 thread so far

>> No.8197499

I think we have different perceptions of what minimalism in fashion is.

>> No.8197504

>>8197472
yeah i looked a little more minimal in the thumbnail kek

>> No.8197506

>>8197489
what porn is effay???
>>8197499
really???????????????????????????

>> No.8197511

>>8197504
it*

>> No.8197525
File: 21 KB, 300x400, esq-jeans-t-shirt-0411-lg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197525

>>8197489
here is a minimal fit for u

happi?

>> No.8197531

>>8197506
Is sarcasm effay?

>> No.8197566
File: 212 KB, 675x1230, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197566

>>8197525

>> No.8197636
File: 1005 KB, 675x1230, 1399422429896.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197636

>>8197566
the red is just plain basic bitch

>> No.8197660

>>8197636

Balenciaga menswear was much better under Barnabé.

>> No.8197673
File: 21 KB, 300x450, anro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197673

>>8197437
this is amazing. as a girl it's hard to find minimalist fashion but i'm glad i happened upon this thread

>> No.8197684

>>8197673
Wtc qt minimalist gf

>> No.8197692

>>8197684
places you'll never expect to find one
i'm in southwest usa

it's very lonely here, i'm very lonely here lol

>> No.8197707

>>8197673

You need to start reading Childhood Flames and Lulu and Your Mom. Both girls with great taste who know how much is just enough.

>> No.8197714
File: 23 KB, 242x206, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197714

>>8197692
>mfw No qt's in south fla

>> No.8197727

>>8197440
w2c shoes?

>> No.8197774
File: 201 KB, 377x453, fly me to the sky.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8197774

>>8197673
yw

>> No.8197797

WHY? It's minimalism. It's fucking nothing. Why do you need inspo?

>> No.8197802

>>8197797

I'd say it's about the right thing, not a lack of a thing.

>> No.8197807

>>8197440
w2c shirt of this color ?

>> No.8197840

>>8197473
that was a great read, thx
more stuff like that needs to be posted and discussed here imo

>> No.8198237
File: 35 KB, 572x380, 1399094222815.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8198237

>>8197802
shiet, that's deep mang

>> No.8198427

>>8197380
Shit, w2c jacket

>> No.8198481

>>8197444
where can i get pants like that which i can hem later?

>> No.8199124
File: 1.99 MB, 250x223, HgxheMQ.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199124

>>8197797
WHY not just scroll slightly further down or put inspo on your filter list instead of trying to shit on the thread?

>> No.8199134
File: 222 KB, 1000x1500, 1396092494418.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199134

send this bitch up
1/?

>> No.8199142
File: 147 KB, 500x750, 1396165521111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199142

>>8199134

>> No.8199147
File: 93 KB, 478x636, 1396349190769.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199147

>>8199142
trying to avoid jeans+tshirts, although I have some of that if someone wants it in particular

>> No.8199152
File: 685 KB, 1332x2831, 1396384958482.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199152

>>8199147

>> No.8199156
File: 788 KB, 2232x2220, 1396387776341.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199156

>>8199152

>> No.8199160

solid colors =/= minimalist, my boys

>> No.8199162
File: 97 KB, 400x600, 1396420634766.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199162

>>8199156
bordering on breaking the minimal here

>> No.8199166
File: 149 KB, 399x590, 1396711283774.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199166

>>8199162

>> No.8199168
File: 84 KB, 433x726, 1396715273715.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199168

>>8199166

>> No.8199172
File: 49 KB, 640x619, 1396746381176.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199172

>>8199168

>> No.8199179
File: 142 KB, 720x1079, 1397127980790.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199179

>>8199172

>> No.8199183
File: 382 KB, 763x1647, 1396446110426.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199183

>>8199179
dont really have much more without straying too far into basic bitch, but will post upon request.

>> No.8199191
File: 128 KB, 665x987, 028_022.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199191

>> No.8199215
File: 249 KB, 640x480, 5290a193.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199215

i can't be the only one who thinks black jeans look like ass

>> No.8199217

>>8198427

>> No.8199218

>>8199215

You are.

>> No.8199226

>>8199218

i like to have texture in my pants

>> No.8199254

>>8199179
someone give that man a big mac, he must be hungry after surviving auschwitz

>> No.8199270

>>8199254
>implying thats skinny

lol fatty

>> No.8199392
File: 788 KB, 1182x3166, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199392

>> No.8199407

>>8199172
w2c jacket

>> No.8199412

>>8197444
nice post.. one of the only actual minimalist posts here. very hard to pull this off like he does. im jealous as fuck

>> No.8199479

>>8197566
w2c #5/7/8 shoes?

>> No.8199480

>>8197673
I really like this fit. This could work on guys too right? (With less skinny jeans of course)

>> No.8199521

>>8199407
nike destroyer

>> No.8199525

>haven't read the thread yet
>expect "black jeans white tee" to be down there
Wish me luck, faggots ;__;
Why cannot you post something that is actually "inspo"?

>> No.8199526

>>8197673
w2c sweater

>> No.8199530
File: 1.05 MB, 320x240, nod_and_thumb.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199530

>>8199525
>tfw when I was wrong

>> No.8199536

Can someone please post the infographic type image for minimalism? includes Bauhaus watch and postmans etc

>> No.8199537
File: 247 KB, 1000x800, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199537

>> No.8199539

>>8199537
>why does everyone on /fa/ look the same?!?

Now you know why, because shitheads post dumb infographics.
Go ahead people ask w2c all of this.

>> No.8199540

>>8199536
But don't overdo, or you'll simply be a joke.

>> No.8199542

>>8199537
tahaanks

>> No.8199549

>>8197459
10/10 will look awesome when it rains

>> No.8199588

>>8199537
w2c rounded hem shirt?

>> No.8199667

>>8197437
so cool

>> No.8199672

>>8199537
what derbies are these

>> No.8199678

>>8199672
RW postman

>> No.8199686

>>8199152
w3c coat??????

>> No.8199702
File: 99 KB, 461x1000, blkkk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199702

wish the zips were black, totally ruin the minimalism of this fit

>> No.8199736
File: 58 KB, 720x1280, 1399470805846.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199736

I tried

>> No.8199744

>>8199736
u failed

>> No.8199750

>>8199736
wtf is minimalist about this?
Minimalism is about a few bare essential pieces in a monochrome color palette and with emphasis on the silhouette. This fails on all three accounts.

>> No.8199775

>>8199750
>Minimalism is about a few bare essential pieces in a monochrome color palette and with emphasis on the silhouette
Good that you have the offical definition!
You fucking nerd, go away.
That fit is ok though. Nothing special.

>> No.8199781

>>8199750
is this satire

>> No.8199784

>>8199736
Thought you were a girl

>> No.8199834

>>8199750

hahahahaha oh wow.

>> No.8199849

>>8199834
he right tho'

>> No.8199856

>>8199736
this is not even /mfa/ tier

>> No.8199894

>>8199392
w2c shirt

>> No.8199922
File: 58 KB, 300x450, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199922

w2c sweater like this? must be comfy

>> No.8199928

>>8199702
That sillhouette is disgusting

>> No.8199932
File: 31 KB, 300x450, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8199932

w2c sweater like this? must be comfy

>> No.8199933

>>8199179
w2c similar coat?

>> No.8199935

>>8199537
I wear all of that and i listen to minimal techno w0w

>> No.8199936

>>8199932
fuck, meant to post in fuccboi. my bad

>> No.8199938

>>8199254
Why don't you give him one of yours you far cunt

>> No.8200099

>>8199736
hahaha omfg what a piss of shit

>> No.8200104

>>8199702
beat mode activated

>> No.8200315

>>8199933
The brand is called Rains.

>> No.8200396

>>8200315
>>8199933
bullshit thats stutterheim

>> No.8200399

>>8200396
Not him, but no it's Rains.

>> No.8200414

>>8199152
w2c boots?

>> No.8200459

>>8197437
w2c pants on gril in the middle for men? What would they be called?

>> No.8200472

>>8200459
cropped melange wool trousers

>> No.8200484

>>8200459
"Women's clothing"

>> No.8200618

>>8199736
loved the mirror, man

>> No.8200623

>>8197380
w2c jacket sonnnnn

>> No.8201275

>>8199215
Yeah, you are.

>> No.8201283

>>8197452
fuck that dudes ugly

>> No.8201358

Which sneakers will go best with minimalism?
I already have derby shoes so i'm looking for something comfy.

>> No.8201363
File: 13 KB, 223x214, le lemon face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8201363

>>8197452
lemons?!

>> No.8201406

>>8198237
Thats always been what minimalism is about just some people miss the point

>> No.8201409

>>8199392
His shoes are tied so weird

>> No.8201523

>>8201358
Acne Adrians maybe

>> No.8201553

>>8197531
No, it isn't.

>> No.8201611

>>8197380
w2c everything

>> No.8201635

>>8199750
>in a monochrome color palette

that is where you are wrong

>> No.8201647

>>8199750
please direct yourself to
>>8197473

>> No.8201652

>>8201635
Do you even know what monochrome means? All the good minimalist fits in here are monochrome.

>> No.8201681

>>8201647
95% of the example fits in that thread are monochrome, emphasize uniqe silhouettes and are 1 to 3 pieces max. just because he didn't use pretentious terms like "Impersonal Austerity" doesn't mean that definition doesn't also hold true, for him and a lot of other people. her last point "democratic/accessible" about making clothes from really cheap materials is violated by most of her examples, and who cares about cost price when all those runway pieces and high fashion she lists would be insanely expensive. for practical purposes of people trying to dress themselves as a consumer I'd say that blog's definition is next to worthless. ur thoughts?

>> No.8201687

>>8201611
you have to try really* hard

>> No.8201720
File: 582 KB, 553x515, america.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8201720

Minimalist doesn't mean using minimal amount of color you fucking morons

>> No.8201744

>>8201720
black is all colors together.

>> No.8201760

>>8201720
>>8201744
so white is the most minimal color of all

>> No.8201764
File: 118 KB, 460x470, 1398181583029.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8201764

idk if this counts

>> No.8201769

>>8199215
what fucking board do you think youre on

>> No.8201776
File: 291 KB, 900x1383, 1395091335551.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8201776

>> No.8201783

>>8201744

black is the absence of color
white is all the colors

>> No.8201800

>>8201744
>>8201783
which one is it

>> No.8201825

>>8201681
I think that the blog is definitely bias, but the definition that was laid out stands pretty true. Most of the fits in this thread are in the spirit of the conventional term "minimalism," and that's fine, but I believe that should have been specified beforehand, and people are getting confused because of that. I was specifically directing attention to that article because of the "monochrome color palette" and "bare essential pieces," neither of which are the definition of minimalism, they just happen to often coincide. Minimalism doesn't just mean black/white with a thin silhouette or few pieces, as I see it often being described and I just wanted to make sure in the future more people would know the actual definition.

>> No.8201844
File: 14 KB, 350x179, color_cmy-and-rgb-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8201844

>>8201800
>>8201783
>>8201744
depends on what color theory you're using

>> No.8201857

>>8201844
it doesn't work like that in real life though

>> No.8201858

>>8199152
neo

>> No.8201917

>>8201800
White is all colours in terms of light

>> No.8202249

>>8201825
no one said anything about "thin" silouette or black and white. monochrome does not mean black and white only.. at all. and im curious how you think you will be implementing democracy and impersonal austerity into your fits. those terms are meaningless to most people when they are putting together a fit.

>> No.8202298
File: 157 KB, 1200x1200, 620LightboxColorAddition1200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202298

>>8201857
you're an idiot.

>> No.8202308

>>8202298
fairy tales

>> No.8202315
File: 209 KB, 642x474, subtractive colour filtres.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202315

>>8202308
jaden smith pls go

>> No.8202337

>>8199166
w2c sweatshirt

>> No.8202351
File: 225 KB, 1178x2229, 1396308573674.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202351

w2c pullover hoodie? Uniqlo is sold out.

>> No.8202357

>>8202351
weekday

>> No.8202424
File: 160 KB, 853x1946, 1394664315937.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202424

>>8202357

thanks

>> No.8202707

>>8202424
>>8202351
really not feeling the impersonal austerity or accessible democracy in these fits. sorry

>> No.8202747

>>8201409
he probably ties them with only his right hand. I do the same

>> No.8202822

>>8202249
The impersonal austerity is just silhouettes that don't try to flatter your body(like the whole legging/yoga pants craze lately), I think the best example from this thread at a glance would be the girl in >>8197444
As for democracy/accessibility, I think that's more describing the movement rather than the pieces, but I guess I'd try to find to look for different interesting types of material when purchasing pieces?

>> No.8202828

>>8202424
w2c jacket?

>> No.8202838

>>8202707
what's econ 100A like

>> No.8202901
File: 103 KB, 610x915, z-zegna-fw14_fy26.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202901

2 much black in this thread B^(

>> No.8202904
File: 147 KB, 550x480, Jil Sander Pre-Fall 11 - 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202904

>> No.8202911
File: 201 KB, 1350x704, JilSanderFall2013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202911

>> No.8202917
File: 205 KB, 1280x853, MLM7847ZZegnaSonnyphotos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202917

>> No.8202921
File: 150 KB, 400x600, 072613-tji-ignacio7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202921

>> No.8202935
File: 66 KB, 530x795, Prada-Man-FW13_09.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8202935

>> No.8203707

>>8202901
>>8202904
>>8202911
>>8202917
>>8202921
>>8202935

HAHAHAHA you retard! none of this is minimalism.

Please get educated before posting this shit:
http://the-rosenrot.com/2013/08/defining-minimalism-in-fashion.html

>> No.8203742
File: 75 KB, 582x400, 1373992598747.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8203742

>>8203707
lol

>> No.8203774

>>8197473
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shibui
渋い for English people is so misconstrued, Japanese people often use it for really inane things, such as if you searching for 渋い on google, Jason Statham comes up...

>> No.8203789

>>8197714
>no qt's in south fla

Nigga have you ever been to Miami? Nothing but hot chicks

>> No.8204281
File: 1.93 MB, 3264x2448, 1399340756262.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8204281

>> No.8204288

>>8204281
>mfacore

>> No.8204302

>>8197380
what are the shoes?

DBSS?

>> No.8204327

>>8204302
af1 mids with a gold plate attached at the back

you are welcome in advance

>> No.8204334

>>8197473
the moma defintion was cool too

>> No.8204335

>>8204327
those aren't Air Forces?

>> No.8204336
File: 17 KB, 160x180, jil banander.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8204336

>>8203707

>>8204302
Givenchy

>> No.8204342

>>8204336
Don't listen to that fuccboi tomato
keep fruitin'!

>I-I have that jumper

>> No.8204344

>>8204336
thanks man

>> No.8204436

>>8203707
wow great argument fagtron you sure convinced me with those hot opinions

>> No.8204722

>>8203789
they're all uninteresting

>> No.8205120
File: 195 KB, 406x640, endoftheline.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8205120

/thread

>> No.8205143

>>8199215
I agree m8
black jeans are shit.
raws are even worse, they are complete shit and cancer

>> No.8205160

>>8199134
WTC everything

>> No.8205171
File: 174 KB, 2403x3204, bikiopbabe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8205171

>>8205120
hang on, i have that model's face

>> No.8205195

>>8205143

what jeans do you wear

>> No.8205211

>>8205195
cheap shitty ones
I suffer every day because I can't find any jeans I like

>> No.8205368

>>8199166
w2c jacket

>> No.8205722

>>8199166
w2c tee

>> No.8207450

>>8202838
>100A
what's community college like?

>> No.8207462

>>8197380
dog is definitely shoped

>> No.8207679

>>8197380
w2c cheap minimalist dog

>> No.8207685

>>8202351
w2c pants?

>> No.8207715

man tomato is the only good thing going on iit

>> No.8207721
File: 307 KB, 1366x2048, christophelemairefw13(3).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8207721

I posted a minimalist thread ages ago and it got archived but the fkn archive went down

>> No.8207750

>>8199215
Nope, they look fucking shitty.

>> No.8207781

>>8203707
>quoting a blog
>not understanding what minimalism is
>lmao

People thinking Minimalism = grey/black/white only are wrong

>> No.8207807

>>8199134
Fuck I'm mirin

>> No.8207913

>>8207721
>>>/fa/
seems fine 2 me

>> No.8208095

>>8197380
ID on shoes ?

>> No.8208510

>>8199152
Holy shit, where can I get that coat?

>> No.8208566

W2c minimalist black bomber?

>> No.8208582

>>8199736
w2c mirror

>> No.8208618

>>8208566
T alexander wang for a cheap one

>> No.8208711

>>8208618
>1000+
>cheap

>> No.8209014

>>8207721
post more like that for girls pls.

>> No.8209091

>>8208095
givenchy

>> No.8209124

>>8199124
fuuuuck she wants her to give her the good old alphabet soup.

>> No.8209189

>>8201857
You never attended physics class in high school, right?

>> No.8209447

>>8207913
>>>>/fa/

he obviously meant the archive for the actual thread, not all of fa you fuckwit

>> No.8209463

>>8207781
this. plus using color in minimalist fits is harder to pull off.

>> No.8209486

>>8207462
>>8207679
fucking kek

>> No.8209493

>>8202337
Its geller, difficult to find

>> No.8210182

>>8199124
where did you get this pic of me and my bf?

xDD

>> No.8210189

>>8197727
seconded

>> No.8210919

>>8207721
>http://the-rosenrot.com/2013/08/defining-minimalism-in-fashion.html
Such austerity....
Wow, this truly is an stunning example of minimalism. Note the juxtaposition of the perturbed methamphetamine addict in the background against the smooth, expressionless lines of the adolescent boy in the foreground. Democratically austere, yet unrelenting in the expression of nothing. When art "scholars" combine terms, in this way, the public is fooled into accepting as doctrine the linen suits and style of a 1970's shuffleboard court.

>> No.8211111
File: 59 KB, 570x427, il_570xN.199065661.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8211111

>>8199179
>>8197380
minimalist dog inspo

>> No.8211199

>>8202337
>>8209493


just cop this, it's similar

http://www.incu.com/shop-men/designer/acne-studios/college-sweater-degrade/

>> No.8212771
File: 43 KB, 350x610, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8212771

This is my favourite minimal fit I've seen on effay.

>> No.8213820

>>8212771
W2C everything?

>> No.8213966
File: 385 KB, 853x1280, TK-2012-11-03-008-001-Harajuku.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8213966

>> No.8214131

>>8212771
>>8213820
die pls.
>>8213966
That's not minimalist. Just think of how much attention they draw.
>tokyo
die pls

>> No.8214136

>>8214131
i think you're looking for a basic bitch thread

>> No.8214152
File: 62 KB, 550x733, 1376779631400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8214152

>>8214136
I think you are wearing black jeans white tee today.

>> No.8214168

>>8214152
???

>> No.8214197

>>8209189
Fuck not even a physics class, I learned that in earth physical science, freshman year.

>> No.8214205

>>8207450
#rekt

>> No.8214207

>>8214168
Well, that fit with "w2c" reply is actually Zara + some cheap chelseas, you may check the catalog, and I don't find it good. Neither I think that that Tokyo fit is good, just because I stated above, no offence, but typing in "NO U" would have been kinda stupid, but just post something good, best pic so far is >>8207721

>> No.8214449

>>8197437
jeans aint fa

>> No.8214465

>>8199254
gtfo fit

>> No.8214525

>>8202707
>>8203707
Lol... I can't believe you quoted from that blogpost.

>> No.8214544
File: 447 KB, 680x697, 1379132139140 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8214544

>>8214152
More like this pls, qt minimal would be preferred

>> No.8214726

>>8214207
Wrong, that fit is SLP bro. The guys a model for Hedi or something if I remember correctly.