[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 81 KB, 491x702, IMG_20140506_111723.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195663 No.8195663[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Wow /fa/ mods consider no bra threads lewd enough to get deleted
Fuck you guys. It's just nipple outlines. Every1 has em. Get with the times

>> No.8195676
File: 96 KB, 539x523, IMG_20140506_111928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195676

With sheer

>> No.8195680
File: 31 KB, 539x426, IMG_20140506_112136.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195680

>> No.8195682
File: 78 KB, 521x576, IMG_20140506_112313.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195682

Subtle
Hate her hair though

>> No.8195689
File: 43 KB, 471x761, IMG_20140506_112559.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195689

Brandy dress

>> No.8195694

Ha. Here in france women don't even bother wearing tops to the beach.

>> No.8195696

>>8195694
they are sluts

>> No.8195697
File: 126 KB, 308x302, 1394708121032.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195697

>>8195696

>> No.8195700

>>8195696
slut-shaming
OHhhhHHh no!
fuck off d00d nothing wrong with promiscuity

>> No.8195701

>>8195696
>>>/reddit/r/MRA

>> No.8195702

>>8195697
only tops?
Why not panties as well?
Are they shamed or sexually repressed?

>> No.8195705

>>8195694
Murricans are oversensitive about female sexuality
We're a fairly underdeveloped country tbh

>> No.8195708

>>8195702
hell why not its their body

>> No.8195709

>>8195701
>>8195700
He was le kidding

>> No.8195712

>>8195708
idk I wouldn't want tan lines on my butt and vagina

>> No.8195715

>>8195712
yeah if you didn't wear clothes to the beach you wouldn't get them

>> No.8195716

>>8195702
Do YOU cover your man-tits at the beach? No? Then drop the double standard
Boobs aren't genitalia

>> No.8195724
File: 79 KB, 465x700, tumblr_lundkhWa2W1qdzhvfo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195724

>>8195663

>> No.8195730
File: 73 KB, 479x743, IMG_20140506_113725.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195730

>> No.8195735

Natural and careless aesthetic is ultimate /fa/. Mods are shit for deleting that

>> No.8195744

>>8195730
She's so perfect...

>> No.8195748

my ex-gf used to go braless a lot. the best was in the summer when she would wear loose fitting tank tops. dat sideboob.....and now tfw no gf

>> No.8195752

>>8195744
what picture was delete

>> No.8195753 [DELETED] 

>>8195735
its so funny that the mods dont prune the countless threads that actually are off-topic

>> No.8195758
File: 71 KB, 505x756, IMG_20140506_114642.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195758

Our lord and savior

>> No.8195759
File: 748 KB, 1536x2346, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195759

this picture does weird things to my pants, it makes them smaller

>> No.8195762

>>8195759
Such a butterface

>> No.8195765

>>8195753
>wanting mods to delete funposting
maybe you should go to reddit

>> No.8195772

>>8195758
No tits visible on that 8 year old boy body, sorry

>> No.8195773

>>8195762
i think you meant to say milf, anon

>> No.8195775

>>8195765
projecting

>> No.8195779

>>8195772
Yeah she's hella flat. Have to be to model...
Itty tits are effay though

>> No.8195780

>>8195702
do you walk around the beach with your dong out?

>> No.8195792

Femanons post your braless fits?

>> No.8195804

I like it. It's a subtle, natural sex appeal female fashion needs more of. I'm sick of tiny neon skater skirts being "fashionable", they're not

>> No.8195816
File: 836 KB, 960x1280, CAM04116.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195816

>>8195792
Got deleted in the last thread. Trying again

>> No.8195828

>>8195816

whore

>> No.8195832

>>8195816
Damn curl why on meth binge

Also, I'm not a gyno but I'll take a look

>> No.8195834

>>8195816
ugly as fuck shirt smh I hope you're not wearing that outside
ur size is appropiate for braless fits tho

>> No.8195836

>>8195828
See:>>8195700
>>8195701
>>8195697
and fuck off

>> No.8195838
File: 55 KB, 520x646, IMG_20140506_120115.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195838

She looks so fun to hang out with

>> No.8195841

>>8195780
yeah why not?

>> No.8195845
File: 885 KB, 250x144, 1389879488766.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195845

>This thread

>> No.8195851

>tfw no qt braless gf

>> No.8195852

>>8195816
MY DICK

>> No.8195861

>>8195852
my FUCKING.... DICKKKKKKKK

>> No.8195866
File: 799 KB, 960x1280, CAM04124.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195866

>>8195834
I've worn this out with no bra and black cuffed jeans

>> No.8195872

>>8195841
How does liberation feel?

>> No.8195881

>>8195866
pls post fit
your hair looks gr8 too bby

>> No.8195882

>>8195816
looks kind of trashy. comb you hair at least

>> No.8195883

>>8195866
so much for no camwhore thread :^)

>> No.8195891

Does /fa/ like K Stew?
I don't think she's worn a bra in her life

>> No.8195895

>>8195891
nope
back to /tv/
(k stew is marion cotillard minus 5 points)

>> No.8195897
File: 52 KB, 462x752, IMG_20140506_121532.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8195897

>>8195891
Oops forgot pic

>> No.8195902

>>8195882
>>8195881
Hair confusion
I like it short & messy. But yea that fit was maybe too casual to go that route

>> No.8195906

No other femanons on this board who like to ditch the confines of the chest patriarchy?

>> No.8195926

>MFW I think this looks weird
>MFW I realize the only reason I think that is because I've been presented a false standard my entire life

>> No.8195952

>>8195926
Gonna be difficult when you see some real titties for the first time

>> No.8195958

>>8195838
She's so fucking perfect

Cara is shit compared to Behati and anyone that denies this is a homo

>> No.8195965

all of this seems exceptionally french

>> No.8195967

>>8195872
feels great

>> No.8195978

>>8195866
Something like this >>8195838 would be so much better
Again, plain white t's are the shit without bra

>> No.8195979

>>8195845
>that fucking gif

>> No.8196068

>>8195759
carice bb

>> No.8196080
File: 78 KB, 800x584, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196080

>>8195700
>nothing wrong with promiscuity
>nothing wrong with being a sinful degenerate who's at high risk for STDS And unwanted pregnancy
Yeah totally fine!!! Stop slut shaming!!!!

Lol pls be trolling fucking tumblrfag

>> No.8196088

>>8196080
>what is safe sex
Seriously, your arguments are retarded

>> No.8196092

>>8195897
god damn, this bitch is fucking stunning

>>8195866
pocket tee doesn't look good
you have nice tits for bra-less but clean it up

also curlgurl can tell its you by that amazing decolletage

>> No.8196095

>>8196092
>>8195832

Not curlgurl, idk who that is

>> No.8196101

>>8196092
But thank you

>> No.8196102

>>8195926
>MFW I realize the only reason I think that is because I've been presented a false standard my entire life
>false standard

I don't know man, unless you have mosquito tits bras are kind of a necessity. My gf even sleeps with a sports bra on because she says it's uncomfortable as fuck for her to have her tits slapping around freely.

>> No.8196104

>>8195902
just made you look straight out of a trailer park in that picture

>> No.8196107
File: 118 KB, 1444x1080, 1392391793368.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196107

>>8196095
calling bullshit

>> No.8196109

>>8196107
That's her? Ick

>> No.8196114
File: 65 KB, 576x541, IMG_20140506_131602.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196114

>>8196107
Nope I promise

>> No.8196122

>>8196107
come on, sieg, get your shit together

>> No.8196124

>>8196114
what a shame, you look like amy schumur's half jew younger sister who they locked in the basement

>> No.8196128
File: 631 KB, 1419x987, ew.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196128

>>8196107
>>8196092
wow sieg youre fucking pathetic

>> No.8196141

>>8196124
Dunno who that is

>> No.8196156
File: 63 KB, 521x567, IMG_20140506_132331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196156

>>8196124
Amy Schumer has a general chubby look. I don't see a resemblance

>> No.8196157

>>8196124
Sieg post a pic of your face

>> No.8196166

>>8196156

just like you you deluded fat fuck

>> No.8196171

>>8196156
cute

>> No.8196175

>>8196156
she looks just like you, but she is more cute/childlike and less mundane

http://nycomedy.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/amy-schumer-12.jpg?w=450&h=600

>> No.8196177

I feel like people on /fa/ get off on insulting people over the internet.

>> No.8196178

>>8196156
Much qt-er than >>8196107.

>> No.8196182

>>8196175
Nah she has a fat face
we get it you like Aryan things

>> No.8196183

I bet sieg is actually black or something

>> No.8196185

>>8196166 If that's fat I'm officially a whale

>> No.8196190

>>8196156
>>8196107
>>8196178
Both 7's

>> No.8196193

>>8196156
Pls be in Toronto.

>> No.8196197

>>8196183 He's posted face before I thought?

>> No.8196204

>>8196156
plz be in Phoenix

>> No.8196208

>>8196107
she looks so bland and boring

>> No.8196213

>>8196156
pls study neuroscience

>> No.8196217
File: 134 KB, 703x1168, 1399083491000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196217

>>8196157
here you go

>> No.8196218

>>8196213
Thank you. This world needs more doctors

>> No.8196224

>>8196217

is this real life?

>> No.8196227

>>8196217
PLZ BE IN LONDON

>> No.8196231
File: 209 KB, 1000x1380, kelly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196231

>>8196182
really?>>8195897
kristen stewart is hotter than curl or amy scumer

so is this bitch

>> No.8196235

>>8196217
Wow sieg is heinous. Why don't you fix your own face first before giving advice...?

>> No.8196242

>>8196231
agreed about KStew, but that bitch is committing the capital sin of drawn on eyebrows

>> No.8196249

>>8196231
Actually fat. Fatter than Schumer. And manly as fuck

>> No.8196253

>>8196231
>shit tattoos
No thanks

>> No.8196257

>>8196156
Pretty eyes

>> No.8196264

>>8196235
not giving advice, i mistakenly thought you were the most attractive woman to post on the forum

so, i actually complimented you....then explained why i was wrong in assuming you were the beautiful ex-regular here....why are you mad?

>> No.8196266

>>8196156
>a grill posts
:D
>she's an attention whore
D:
when will i learn

>> No.8196275

>>8196264
That wasn't me. I think Schumer's kinda gross but I ain't mad

>> No.8196276

>>8196249
>>8196253
kelly osbourne
knows a fuck ton about fashion, daughter of heavy metal legend, british accent (cute) and cute to boot.

just becuase she's 10 pounds over weight doesn't mean someone who looks like >>8196156
this is more attractive just becuase she is in normal BMI

weight =/= attractiveness

>> No.8196282

>>8196276 No way is she 10 pounds over. Try 50. I'd take both of these >>8196156 >>8196107 basic b's over her

>> No.8196300

>>8196282
Why is /fa/ so obsessed with skeletons

>> No.8196305

>>8196282
you only want the jew amy schumer (can't spell her name don't want to try) look alike because she's a meh girl.

like the hot girl prom scenario, most attractive woman in school not asked to prom because all the guys assume she'll say no/is out of their league.

i'd stick my dick in that frumpy brunette in heart beat, but i wo't go around bragging about it like i would if i fucked a curlgurl look alike

>> No.8196307

>>8196276 Was that pic really you?

>> No.8196311

>>8195816
I mainly like your collar bones.
Not such a fan of the freeboobing look but I certainly would not look down on someone doing it unless they looked like a method addicted whore.

>> No.8196321

>>8196305 That girl's facial structure or body aren't any better than curl's. They're both solid 7's IMO. The brunette looks more laid back, if you fixed her up she could be an 8.

>> No.8196325

>>8196305
>Calling other people "frumpy"
> >>8196217

>> No.8196333

>>8196305
Curlgurl looks infinitely more boring than her. I'd rather have a messy-haired freeboobing chick anyday.

>> No.8196337
File: 62 KB, 1024x768, nobra.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196337

>>8196124
>>8196124
get your shit together Sieg

>> No.8196344

>>8196337
Hideous necklace.

>> No.8196347

>>8196337
Most normcore grill fit ever, dull as fuck

>> No.8196354

>>8196337
A) Bad fit
B) No bras allowed itt

>> No.8196356

>>8196321
her face is strictly worse. both have nice bodies, curl is in better shape with better cleavage.

but face, which actually matters, curl has this chick beat easy. sharp blue eyes, sharp features, amazig smile vs dead eyes, rounded face, young features vs curl's womanly traditionally "sexy" facial aesthetics

>> No.8196359

>>8196333
This.
That said I'd shag em both. Fuck, I'd shag every girl in every pic in this thread at the speed of light

>> No.8196363

/fa/ is so tumblr it makes me gag
Going out in public with your tits hanging out isn't liberating it's just slutty and shows a lack of morality

>> No.8196367

>>8196354
I dont think she wears a bra

>> No.8196370

>>8196217
AHAHAHA SIEG. YOU'RE FAT AS FATASS.

>> No.8196373

>>8196356
Based on the two pics posted they both look about 15, bodywise and face wise. Brunette's eyes are bigger and she has better brows. Curl's chin/face shape is better. Lips look the same.
Also this >>8196359

>> No.8196377

The fuck? When did every girl on /fa/ get gorgeous?

>> No.8196384

>>8196367
Whoever is in that pic definitely is
>>8196363
>>>r9k

>> No.8196393
File: 56 KB, 420x594, Skylar+Grey+11th+Annual+BMI+Urban+Awards+Arrivals+HyNfuvNcAhKl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196393

>>8196373
look bigger because the eye shape trick thing michelle phan teaches women on her youtube page.

watch her video
it even makes asian eyes/features appear as if she were in some anime

that brunette's "natural" beauty folds to a garden hose shot at her face. she has a nice body but thats only for a few more years

curl will be one of those 60 year old women you see walking around in bathing suits, still sexy as hell

>> No.8196402
File: 146 KB, 750x1000, kristen_eyeprime_96.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196402

>>8196231
>kristen stewart
Never understood the obsession with her, she has a good face but not (used) expressive(ly) enough for the most part and her body...

>> No.8196403

>>8196384
/r9k/ is a misogynist hell hole though

>> No.8196407

>>8196373
CG looks 28 at least.

>> No.8196416
File: 65 KB, 450x424, 450_lindsay-lohan-braless-52790260.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8196416

Lindsey is so trashy but I'd still hook up with her

>> No.8196417

>>8196393
Good lord. I posted one picture of my face, if you look at it I'm wearing no makeup and my hair is shit. My features are younger, but I'm 18 to her 26. My mom and family are skinny so hopefully my body won't go to shit, though honestly everyone's does; except this magical blonde girl you worship apparently. She's pretty. Cool. Can you guys stop nitpicking and comparing our every feature?
>>8196373 Thanks?

>> No.8196422

>>8196393
Nah I see no eye makeup brah. And no 60 year olds are sexy. None

>> No.8196423

>>8196416
That's so ratchet

>> No.8196423,1 [INTERNAL] 

>>8195709