[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 169 KB, 728x720, Screen Shot 2014-04-28 at 6.45.42 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8161337 No.8161337[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

old thread too old

vans vault classic slip ons in black -- do cop?

>> No.8162095
File: 58 KB, 600x600, VENTILE-CAP-2014-600B_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162095

>>8161337

dnc slip ons are real chunky around the ankle. if you have your heart set on vans (which you shouldn't) make sure you get authentics

cop or not? (will be about $90 after shipping)

>> No.8162118

>>8161337
Pic related, If you're going for slip-ons - and you have a bit off wiggle room in your budget.

>> No.8162122
File: 18 KB, 630x420, diemme-tres-bien-slip-on-sneakers-1-630x420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162122

>>8162118
Forgot pic.

>> No.8162133
File: 335 KB, 750x500, otw_01-750x500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162133

Middle one?

>> No.8162153
File: 57 KB, 1015x506, When not to buy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162153

>>8162133

cop

simple, tight not offensive, and most importantly not roshes

>> No.8162157
File: 847 KB, 500x375, docs.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162157

should i cop doc martens 1460s or 1461s?

>> No.8162166

>>8162095
Wtc?

>> No.8162180

>>8162157

1461s are more summery and probably go with more, but the 1460's are more classic and more true to the statement you are trying to make by wearing docs

>> No.8162190

>>8162180
>statement you are trying to make by wearing docs
wait what?

i'm looking for some simple black boots or derbies, not sure what other brands i should look into

recs?

>> No.8162193

>>8162166

best made co.

>> No.8162260

>>8162190
Solovair 8 eye boots

>> No.8162477

>>8162260
cant find any in my size :/

>> No.8162623
File: 387 KB, 1997x1997, <>.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162623

Which pair?

>> No.8162638

>>8162623
bottom-right
Inb4 that post gets tonns of replies containing only "w2c" in them.
Don't tell the plebs.

>> No.8162665

>>8162623
>>8162638

I was leaning towards the bottom right also

>> No.8162667

>>8162623
top-left or bottom-right

>> No.8162668

>>8162638
>>8162623
http://shop.doverstreetmarket.com/feit-men-s-hand-sewn-low-natural

:^) oops

>> No.8162673

>>8162623
>>8162638
>>8162665

+o(

>> No.8162680

>>8162668
I missed your message, have you already sold those supreme tees? And did you actually buy them? Btw, fuck you.
>>8162673
Fuck you pleb.

>> No.8162688

>>8162680
Yah, came in earlier today. Gonna collect them tomorrow. Not for sale though. ;*

>> No.8162690

>>8162688
So tumblrfame was not a joke?
Maybe sell in some time, like a year or even more?
Anyway, plebs don't have that much money >:^(

>> No.8162708
File: 94 KB, 625x625, henderstompers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162708

>>8162690
I don't joke about things like that.

Nah, i don't think so. Feel like i'm going to regret that. It isn't that hard to find a box logo but crispy white ones - that's a whole 'nother story. Might give one to a mate for his birthday - he missed out on the drop and can't drop the money for resell.

>> No.8162721
File: 22 KB, 128x122, puh.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162721

>>8162680

>> No.8162732
File: 53 KB, 500x334, red-wing-shoes-the-101-postman-oxford-shoe-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162732

>> No.8162738 [DELETED] 
File: 2 KB, 300x151, hmprod[1].2]&set=key[width],value[3997]&set=key[height],value[4673]&set=key[x],value[513]&set=key[y],value[178]&set=key[type],value[FASHION_FRONT]&hmver=1&call=ur.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162738

>> No.8162744
File: 173 KB, 359x441, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162744

>> No.8162765

>>8162744

dnc

>> No.8162793
File: 186 KB, 975x1463, t-by-alexander-wang-mens-waxed-cotton-hooded-jacket.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162793

>> No.8162803

>>8162793
looks cool only if you don't look like the guy on the pic

>> No.8162809
File: 202 KB, 1024x1024, raised_by_wolves_ss14_collection_x-00_1024x1024.jpg?v=1398270981.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162809

I need a hat for summer.

>> No.8162815

>>8162809
this
w2c box logo supreme 5panel

>> No.8162826

>>8162809
lame

get a plain 5 panel istead

>> No.8162833

>>8162133
what model is this? otw rose tesella?

>> No.8162840

>>8162833
yes and the left ones are snake prelows

>> No.8162861

>>8162708
>being that nice
Thanks God this board still has a few trips like you.

>> No.8162865
File: 197 KB, 1024x1024, raised_by_wolves_ss14_collection_x-92_1024x1024.jpg?v=1398271090.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162865

>>8162809

>> No.8162875
File: 262 KB, 1024x1024, raised_by_wolves_ss14_collection_x-83_1024x1024.jpg?v=1398270946.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162875

>>8162865

>> No.8162885
File: 246 KB, 1024x1024, raised_by_wolves_ss14_collection_x-80_1024x1024.jpg?v=1398270809.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162885

>>8162875

>> No.8162902

>>8162153
>#3

a lot of people need to internalize this

>#5
a sale is a pretty good reason to buy something, you can get a lot of good stuff that way

I assume it means "Don't buy something you won't wear just because the sale price tells you it's great deal"

>#6
This is an odd one

Product quality is always worth considering

That said, some people need to stop being delusional about durability. If you wear red wings really hard every day of the week, and don't take proper care of them, they won't last you 10 years

I guess the point is that you shouldn't buy something ugly just because it's supposed to be "high quality", but it's not always so clear-cut. When you're talking about leather products, for example, quality and aesthetics are a lot more closely connected. something might be a nice cut, and look good in photos, but if it's really cheap (or fake) leather, it won't look or feel as satisfying when you get to see it in-person

>#7

well the unfortunate truth is that stuff does sell out if you don't act quickly, especially during sales

again, don't buy something you don't like or won't wear, but 5 6 and 7 are all perfectly good reasons to make purchases, just not on their own. "When you have to justify" is a pretty vague way of saying that. You could replace all these with one rule that says "when your reasons for buying consist only of considerations for value, exclusivity, durability, etc., and you're not primarily concerned with whether it looks good."

cont'd

>> No.8162976

>>8162153
>#4
you should be careful about being too confident about your own opinions, though, if you're just getting started. if you're new to clothing other perspectives will eventually inevitably inform your own, and your tastes are going to change rapidly before they settle on something more permanent. you may find that in a few months' time you agree with all the people on the internet that told you not to buy those boots.

so sure, don't go buying geobaskets just because /fa/ told you they're cool, but you also shouldn't pretend that everyone else's opinions are worthless to you, and that your current tastes are perfectly suited to you and won't change. taste isn't absolutely subjective, we all see things in mostly similar ways

>#8
very good advice, it's easy to fall into this trap

>#9
definitely think about this before buying anything that has a reputation on the internet. it might be tempting to cop rafdidas because you're hyped to do an unboxing thread on /fa/, but any enjoyment you get out of posting cops on the internet is really transitory, you should think first and foremost about wearing your clothing outside of your house

I wasn't trying to pick on rafdidas, I like rafdidas

>#10
It's helpful to think about how your wardrobe is developing, though. It can be easy to buy too many 'cool' pieces and then find that it's hard to find ways to wear them because you don't have versatile basics to pair them with

so anyway that checklist is useful but not perfect

>> No.8162979
File: 52 KB, 455x475, Paul Smith.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8162979

Cop or not guise?

>> No.8162988

>>8162979
topman tier graphic
id say avoid

>> No.8162992

>>8162979
that's pretty neat. If I get that, will people assume I do drugs?

>> No.8163001

Where the fuck do I find this?
>inb4 hurr durr fuck off /mu/ <age ban
https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1.0-9/10155808_659133844139962_7523417053316959528_n.jpg

>> No.8163017

>>8163001
bumpin for this fella

>> No.8163018
File: 32 KB, 455x475, JW Andersons.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163018

>>8162992
>>8162988
So don't cop?
okay.
What about this.

>> No.8163026

>>8163018
dnc

>> No.8163035

>>8162732
yes

>> No.8163041

>>8163026
May I ask why?

>> No.8163052

>>8163041
the colours are fine but that logo looks like shit imo

but if you're into that sailorboy look it's ok

>> No.8163059

>>8163018
Oh Lord. No. Do not cop that.

>> No.8163069

>>8163041
>Anonymous 04/28/14(Mon)22:38:40 No.8163041▶>>8163052
Crewnecks have left the surface of the Earth. Best thing ever.

>> No.8163070

>>8163052
>>8163059
Right, no cop. Got it.

>> No.8163079

>>8163069
u wot m8

>> No.8163081

>>8163001
don't though

even urbanoutfitters is copying this shit

http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=31370596&parentid=M_APP_TEESSHORT

>> No.8163093
File: 28 KB, 455x475, Acne Swearshirt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163093

Cop?

>> No.8163105

>>8163081
Shit. I already own a slightly diff version of it, gray on white. I fucking love that tee. The album has been the soundtrack to my life for almost a year now.

>> No.8163115

>>8163093
doesn't look too bad, just be careful to not make yourself highschoolcore

>> No.8163121

>>8163093
Same faggot again? No, do not cop

>> No.8163137

>>8163093
>http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=31370596&parentid=M_APP_TEESSHORT
i dig it

>> No.8163209

>>8163093

no... gradients are starting to get played out and that particular gradient sweat sucks. look at some fit pics it looks like trash. it would be a cop if the white was grey but then it would be a shameless geller rip

>> No.8163280
File: 58 KB, 455x475, NN.07.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163280

Last time for the same fag with all the shitty sweaters.

>> No.8163284

>>8163280
w2c

>> No.8163310
File: 59 KB, 540x900, 30F131-222_A_58877.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163310

Acne max cash in raw? Any info on the sizing?

>> No.8163325

>>8163284
look at the goddamn tag

>> No.8163328

>>8163284
Well I'm not sure about you, just search NN.07 and it should be there by a stockist

>> No.8163335
File: 20 KB, 265x265, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163335

A pretty good flyknit substitute.

>> No.8163358

>>8163335
why not just get flyknits

>> No.8163384
File: 112 KB, 580x499, givenchy-gray-black-stripes-american-flag-men-s-sweat-6ee4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163384

1/?

>> No.8163393
File: 19 KB, 734x734, goods_09_087347.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163393

>>8163384

2/?

>> No.8163398

>>8163358
The black and white are harder to find nowadays..

>> No.8163412
File: 22 KB, 384x449, hmprod.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163412

>>8163393

3/?

>> No.8163428

>>8162133
bought left ones today, just returned them. The white shit is fuckign low quality bullshit fucking crap.

>> No.8163437

>>8163310
Too slim, looks bad

>> No.8163473

>>8163428
is the sole really that bad?

>> No.8163514
File: 133 KB, 918x790, f_5_176.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163514

left or right?

>> No.8163538
File: 78 KB, 790x657, 2108-524_1_1200x735.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163538

Saucony Shadow Original.
Cop or not?

>> No.8163550

>>8163514
left

>> No.8163595

>>8162095
>real chunky around the ankle
what the hell are you talking about? the padding? slip ons aren't chunky in the least

>>8161337
you still shouldn't get them because leather slip ons will make you look like kitchen staff or some shit

>> No.8163653
File: 397 KB, 940x627, img_0840.1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163653

Need a dark blue hat.

>> No.8163666
File: 1.34 MB, 1884x1182, sh1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163666

leather, dark blue colour, kinda annoyed at that white bottom

>> No.8163670
File: 1.78 MB, 2560x1662, sh2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163670

>>8163666
or these. same but black.

>> No.8163720
File: 925 KB, 900x1200, col_HJoDC4_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163720

In navy. Also does anyone know if jap stores ship to the greatest country on Earth (the United States)?

>> No.8163729

>>8163093
i love it.
>>8163280
ew
>>8163393
i like it but for how much? it looks fine for an everyday outfit, so i wouldnt pay much.

>> No.8163754
File: 55 KB, 1024x683, IMG_8176_1024x1024.jpg?v=1360124146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163754

>> No.8163757

>>8163666
>>8163670
why blur the tags lmao

>> No.8163775

>>8163538
>>8163666
>>8163335
>>8163280
cop

>> No.8163785
File: 58 KB, 455x475, Miansai.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163785

Cop?

>> No.8163824

>>8163754

I get that its classic Ebbetts field to have the green underbrim, but I really wish this was the same color or black

WTC cream baseball cap without green underbrim

>> No.8163830

>>8163754
Can I wear this with a white or grey shirt?

>> No.8163835

>>8163785
no you fucking bitch. Make your own shit like that mang.

>> No.8163857
File: 148 KB, 1024x1024, FairEnds_LinenFloral_Blue_1_1024x1024.jpg?v=1394474680.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163857

>> No.8163871

>>8163835
Damn.

>> No.8163883
File: 86 KB, 800x531, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163883

Legit check / c or n? Not sure if real tricky rick or not...

>> No.8163894
File: 67 KB, 800x531, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163894

>>8163883
2/2

>> No.8163897

>>8163894
Get AF1s instead

>> No.8163903

>>8163883
>>8163894
What uggs are those?

>> No.8163939

>>8163894
>>8163883

do not cop

>> No.8163954
File: 199 KB, 1856x974, dilemma.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163954

which, with and without socks

>> No.8163960
File: 214 KB, 1000x1000, unknown-death[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163960

Really on the fence about this one. I like the design, but I never wear graphic ts and it's sort of expensive (almost 40 bucks).

c or n, /fa/?

>> No.8163968

>>8163960
>$40 for graphic t
>expensive

Do you normally buy graphic t-shirts at wal-mart?

>> No.8163971
File: 153 KB, 870x1110, asos.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8163971

Techno interests me

>> No.8163972

>>8163968
N-n-no. Most of my Ts are just plain/basic Acne, Norse Projects, or APC.

>> No.8163974

>>8163954
middle for sure, the acgs would like nice in a more tech influenced fit but the branding is obnoxious and the straps are unnecessary, sole on the last ones are horrid too

>> No.8163981

>>8163974
cheers, the last ones are like hardcore hiking/outdoors rugged sandals, hence the large sole. but yea was leaning towards mid also

>> No.8163995

>>8163972
if your tees are really from Acne, Norse Projects and APC, how is it possible that you think a 40$ graphic tee is expensive?

>> No.8164021

>>8163995
Because it's just a cheap t shirt, dude. I have had shirts from concerts before and they are usually just AA or Hanes shirts.

More so asking about the design, rather than price in relation to shirts I wear often.

>> No.8164029

>>8163981
no probs fella

>> No.8164034
File: 525 KB, 804x752, Screenshot_36.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164034

I dress pretty hypebeast

>> No.8164040

>>8163960
cop

>> No.8164042

>>8163666
>>8163670
I actually really like these, is there any way I could order that brand somewhere?

>> No.8164045

>>8163954
Would get the ACGs but that's just me.

>> No.8164048

>>8164034
nah get one with a bigger logo so people know what brand youre wearing

>> No.8164111
File: 28 KB, 450x450, gg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164111

grey adidas gazelles

>> No.8164114

>>8163514
w2c left?

>> No.8164191
File: 1.10 MB, 320x240, fred-sanford-o[1].gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164191

>>8163325
Not everyone can read it, you big dummy.

>> No.8164242

>>8164114
i love ugly

>> No.8164274
File: 116 KB, 750x1000, $_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164274

Y/N?

>> No.8164306

>>8163595
>trying not to look like kitchen staff

>> No.8164428
File: 91 KB, 1000x1000, d_334.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164428

>>8163971
i can tell it clearly doesnt you fucking plen

imma cop pic related but im wondering what you fuccboys have to say

>> No.8164438
File: 28 KB, 425x560, vintage wash.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164438

>>8162875
of the four, this one. i wouldn't opt for any tho

>>8162902
>That said, some people need to stop being delusional about durability.
f'real.

>>8163514
left's allright

>>8163757
>why blur the tags lmao
was wondering the same


on the fence w/this tank. i might just do it anyways cause it's inexpensive, and fuck, it's gonna start getting hot here all too soon.

>> No.8164475
File: 78 KB, 683x1024, e43cacb708fe0632e22e3c9f3a1525127f79d099_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164475

>> No.8164528

>>8164274

Anyone?

>> No.8164535

>>8164475

w2c

>> No.8164540
File: 92 KB, 685x264, sk8 hi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164540

Right or left? Which one is more versatile?

>> No.8164552
File: 111 KB, 1575x665, boots.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164552

Black leather clark dbs

Is it too pleb to buy these?

I need some business-casual shoes for work (black specifically) and I kind of wanted something a little more /fa/ than standard black dress shoes.

Any other recs if I shouldn't cop?

>> No.8164559
File: 2.38 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164559

>> No.8164569

>>8164552
I have a black suede pair and I like how they look. not a fan of the leather there though

>> No.8164588

>>8164569
hmmm.
Interesting. I sort of wanted to stay clear of the suede. Seems less versatile and more prone to getting dirty/worn out.

Thanks for the input though. I may reconsider black suede. You dont find they become dirty really easily and they are still in good condition? Also should I order a size less than what I wear normally if I do go with the dbs?

>> No.8164637
File: 311 KB, 480x699, 30958273904857.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164637

>> No.8164919
File: 936 KB, 541x766, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164919

asked as the old one was dying so asking again
the jacket, c/n?

>> No.8164925

>>8162623

Either one of those Feits. They're damn sexy.

>> No.8164927
File: 448 KB, 907x459, Screen Shot 2014-04-29 at 12.35.34 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8164927

>>8161337
need a weekender. trying to decide between these colorways (girl)

>> No.8164937

>>8164919
dnc ugly af

btw if its in a size 0 send a link over to ya boi

>> No.8164969

>>8164927
Go with the left. The one on the right is grandma-tier

>> No.8164987

>>8164937
yoox
its a 2 m8y ;^)

>> No.8164996

>>8164540
depends on how big ur feet are

>> No.8165353

>>8164927
girl, both them ugly af. i guess they're probably decently well-made from quality materials. but shhit. that design looks trash as hell. like a fucking bowling bag of some sort....

>> No.8165358

>>8162826
w2c?

>> No.8165388
File: 16 KB, 300x300, leesslimhoodcoat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165388

cop?

>> No.8165407

>>8165388
No, fit looks good on the picture but shit irl
Read the sticky.

>> No.8165410

>>8165388
why are you even here, read the sticky first

----> tuxbell.com

>>8164927
both are pretty bad gurl. But at least the left one will fit in with a lot more outfits. Right one is just terribad.

>>8164637
pocket ruins it imo

>>8164475
cop

>>8164438
not (pattern just looks like some weird cotton shirt with a denim shirt)

>>8164274
not

>>8164111
gazelles are better than sambas as far as the silhouette of the shoe, but the adidas logo on the back and the writing on the top would make me lean towards other shoes. At the end of your day it's your choice though.

>>8163960
anything with Japanese writing on it like that will just look retarded

source: am Japanese

>>8163883
don't

>>8163857
if you can work it into some outfits, go for it

>>8163785
*puke*

>>8163720
I can tell you how to get shit from Japan for relatively cheap with ultra fast shipping off websites like Yahoo auction (basically Japanese ebay) or Rakuten, Amazon JP etc..

>> No.8165496

>>8164475
do it.

>> No.8165500

>>8164021
design-wise it's pretty basic, man. you're basically in a situation where you'd be paying for 40$/self-indulgence.

not that's a bad thing, and we shouldn't take this to a place where we're discussing fashion as self-indulgence, either. but, noone's going to catch the meme-rap reference, and the graphic is really not so special beyond that.

so, i guess it's not that helpful, but my advice is basically: only cop if you feel strongly like you need it...

>> No.8165508

>>8165388
Great piece, cop! And don't forget to post in WAYWT :)

>> No.8165512

>>8165410
>I can tell you how to get shit from Japan for relatively cheap with ultra fast shipping off websites like Yahoo auction (basically Japanese ebay) or Rakuten, Amazon JP etc..
not the guy you're talking to, but i'm interested in the information you may have...

>> No.8165555
File: 74 KB, 927x1000, beata_low_denim_stacked_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165555

Hmmm

>> No.8165569

>>8165555
no matter how cheap: no.

>> No.8165572

>>8164428
>not autismally remembering dumbass hel-looks quotes.

It's like you don't want to make it anon

>> No.8165580
File: 214 KB, 620x850, 722a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165580

I am asian and I have a feminine body type

>> No.8165628
File: 367 KB, 700x1952, T21rHHXvNaXXXXXXXX_!!295235377.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165628

>> No.8165761
File: 350 KB, 485x482, cop or not.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165761

$40 on sale

>> No.8165775

>>8165508
chuckled

>> No.8165789
File: 722 KB, 643x398, julius.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165789

im in a position to cop these julius' boots for around 100

what are your thoughts?

>> No.8165792

>>8165789
don't. the leather on those is so thin they'll probably fall of your feet

>> No.8165795
File: 659 KB, 625x402, julius2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165795

>>8165789

>> No.8165800

>>8165792
thanks will avoid a part of me sees deals like this and thinks they are worth picking up just to resell

>> No.8165802

>>8165800
You'll probably keep sitting on these though. If they were the black version it might be easier but I'd not risk it

>> No.8165814
File: 1.15 MB, 2448x2448, IMG_20140429_125509.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165814

Y/N?

>> No.8165885
File: 100 KB, 600x600, IG_8702_Deckie_Brown_1__55667.1378838348.1280.1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165885

Very hot weather is coming.

These sandals, yay or nay?

>> No.8165914
File: 364 KB, 359x480, Снимок1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165914

Cop?

>> No.8165920

>>8165885
>>8165914
nope

>> No.8165931
File: 253 KB, 538x328, Снимок.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8165931

Cop?

>> No.8165960

>>8163001
I see Joy Division shirts all over the place. Srsly can't be that hard to find an overused album cover printed on a shirt. Not that I'd recommend wearing it regardless.

>> No.8165967

>>8165914
fuck no

mfa ruined those

>> No.8166165

>>8165814
W2C?

>> No.8166169

>>8166165
opening ceremony

>> No.8166177

>>8166169
Thanks!

>> No.8166181

>>8166177
found it for you :^)

https://www.openingceremony.us/products.asp?menuid=1&designerid=6&productid=101205

>> No.8166294
File: 85 KB, 920x920, KXJBQN-ALT2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8166294

Y/N? Get some regular ones and distress them myself?

>> No.8166317

>>8162623

Just copped the brown feits

>> No.8166322
File: 52 KB, 478x500, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8166322

Apc polyester jacket

>> No.8166326

>>8166322
sadboys as fuck

>> No.8166335

>>8166326
What's that mean

>> No.8166350
File: 113 KB, 950x633, adidas-originals-zx-flux-pattern-pack-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8166350

cop or not?

>> No.8166355

>>8166335
yung lean

>> No.8166356
File: 30 KB, 491x507, Gucci Sneakers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8166356

Can't afford them for now but as soon as I can, I'll seriously consider it

>> No.8166388

>>8166294
pls help, I can't quite make up my mind on whether I like them or not.

>> No.8166408

>>8166350
cop

>> No.8166411

>>8166388
cop

>> No.8166414

>>8166388
no way, man

>> No.8166419

>>8166411
>>8166414
I don't like the idea of pre-distressed clothing, but I like the colours so much that I didn't even realize what it was supposed to be until further examination. And they are pretty cheap...

>> No.8166423

>>8166419
that style of shoe is just garbage either way, mate. it's not the distressing that ruins it

>> No.8166434

>>8166423
Can't say I agree, I think it'd make for a great beater shoe.

>> No.8166438

>>8166356
just get butteros they're much nicer

>> No.8166466

>>8166423
Why is that?

>> No.8166669
File: 69 KB, 700x700, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8166669

Carhartt wip hoodie

$119

Worth it?

>> No.8166670
File: 16 KB, 428x550, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8166670

Can someone id these?

>> No.8166685

>>8166670
look like roshe knockoffs

>> No.8166704

>>8166438

Thanks, didn't knew them. They look gr8.

>> No.8166718
File: 32 KB, 500x375, $_72.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8166718

I'm about to buy my second pair of shoes, that aren't ugly as fuck.

Cop or not for 20 bucks? With what jeans / shirtcolour can I wear these? cheers

>> No.8166744

>>8166669
nah

>> No.8166779
File: 93 KB, 640x1136, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8166779

>>8166744
Any good quality alternatives?

Also thinking of gettin one from allsaints(pic)

>> No.8166802

>>8166779

For a two-way zip hoodie, Wings + Horns is always a solid bet.

>> No.8166809

>>8166779
i have the vintage ink fox hoody from all saints and its exactly the same as the day i bought it so they seem fine.
will probably pick up the less chunky orian hoody in black tomorrow

>> No.8166816

>>8166802
None in stock till next season and a little out of

If you had to pick, think the carhartt or all saints is better?

>> No.8166817
File: 60 KB, 600x600, huf-sutter-navy-floral_grande.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8166817

cop or not?

>> No.8166818

>>8166718
They're all white sneakers, you can wear them with most things.

I prefer the mids with cuffed jeans though, but the lows can be worn with anything.

>> No.8166994

>>8163666
>>8163670
no to both

looks cheap and awful, also that brown bit at the heel looks retarded

>> No.8167003
File: 18 KB, 300x300, all-saints-brandon-hi-top-profile.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167003

this...

>> No.8167007
File: 31 KB, 450x540, diet-butcher-slim-skin-destroyed-goat-leather-sneakers-3-450x540.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167007

>>8167003
or this.

>> No.8167012

>>8163384
>>8163412

hop off A$APs dick mane

>> No.8167022

>>8167003
seen those in tk maxx and they look shit in person.

>> No.8167087

>>8167007
This better not be the DBSS I'm eyeing.

>> No.8167104
File: 78 KB, 550x870, When not to cop.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167104

>>8162153
since I took issue with some of that list, I did my own revision, with a few added points. obviously it's still far from perfect, and I'm not sure if there's a better way to state #10, but my point was that you shouldn't buy from a brand/designer that you know nothing about, because knowledge is free, and often helpful.

like before you buy a chromexcel quoddy boat shoe, you should know what moccasin construction is, what chromexcel leather is (and what Horween is), who their competitors are (like rancourt, oak street, russell moccasin, yuketen, new england outerwear, etc), a little bit about the maine shoe industry, what kind of styles boat shoes are associated with, etc. maybe you'll learn that there's another product you like better, or that boat shoes weren't right for what you wanted, or maybe you'll just find a different quoddy stockist with a better price.

maybe that all sounds like a bit much, but you should at least know a bit, I think. there's no reason not to do some googling before buying from a brand.

anyway I'm sure someone will let me know if my version is shit

>> No.8167191

>>8167104
you left one out you mentioned earlier i thought was a good idea:

12. Don't buy something you are under-informed or unsure about just because it is a 'good price'.

i get what you're saying w/6, but wonder if it should be re-worded. in due research, one should be reading features/articles/reviews, which are good sources of information, however the issue one should avoid is becoming infatuated - and placing themselves in a position where they're making impulsive purchases.

>> No.8167227
File: 204 KB, 770x470, 6e38c6a170acb92b0df985758aeee6bb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167227

opinions?

>> No.8167234

>>8167191
I hadn't really thought about how 6 and 10 were in conflict, but I guess they are, if taken literally.

Maybe "When you've just been inspired to make the purchase by a persuasive feature or article on the product/brand. Carefully consider whether you're acting impulsively"?

>> No.8167238
File: 184 KB, 720x400, booties.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167238

I really like docs and i've heard a lot of conflicting opinions about them. I think they look really nice with the blacked out stitching. cop or not?

>> No.8167256

>>8166294
Could work well. Is kind of eh though so I would stave off unless they are cheap

>> No.8167264

>>8166294
Looks absolutely revolting

>> No.8167470

>>8167234
right. i think that sounds better. i doubt 6 would have been real cause for confusion, it just struck me as a little vague and blanket statement-y for it's purpose.

>> No.8167524
File: 123 KB, 560x373, flyhumanbeyond-for-adidas-consortium-stan-smith-2 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167524

cop or not?

>> No.8167575

>>8167087
the ones on grailed.
there's also another pair with the studs but those look dodgy af

>> No.8167598

>>8167524
i have them in the all white colorway and the toe box is kinda strange.
im also a 9.5 US and most adidas shoes hurt my arch. But they're a nice staple to any warddrobe.

>> No.8167620

>>8167238
cop.
the white mono is cool too. mamma dod has a beat-up pair and it looks nice.

>> No.8167760

>>8167524
sure, they look great

>> No.8167838
File: 230 KB, 750x1000, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167838

cop?

>> No.8167840
File: 288 KB, 1046x421, sweet jays.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167840

serious

>> No.8167905
File: 154 KB, 950x451, Officer or pedestrian.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167905

Cop these for this summer?

>> No.8167939
File: 32 KB, 600x450, 1385853949446.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8167939

>>8167905
that collar

>> No.8168028

>>8167939
Holy shit I didn't even notice

>> No.8168037

>>8167939
standing collars aren't all that uncommon...

>> No.8168063
File: 1.07 MB, 1080x1920, c366ad46-7695-410a-ae8b-06dd10a2d.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168063

c, N?

>> No.8168124
File: 164 KB, 550x550, knnn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168124

this but with a white filter, corn?

>> No.8168160

>>8163971
Wait, shit, anybody have sauce on this?

>> No.8168173

>>8168124
i want 1 to stop pollen from raping my nostrils but i never see anyone wear masks in ny : (

>> No.8168188

>>8167524
I find the shape really weird looking top down
most people won't care
have similar problem w/ a pair of adidas rod lavers I have

>> No.8168192

>>8168160
Looks like ASOS.

>> No.8168301

>>8168160
>le filename face.jpeg

>> No.8168480
File: 69 KB, 614x370, copornot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168480

>> No.8168518

>>8167838
day 1 cop

>> No.8168528
File: 70 KB, 664x344, 668799c6223e3bc8f8e7373b4a35da6a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168528

>>8168480
sure if you are a stoner.
>>8167838
lol
>>8167238
looks better then the yellow stitching

should i cop these for next fall. or go for more of a combat boot. the only boot i own so far is a dark brown wingtip.

>> No.8168644

>>8168301

>reddit

go back away 9fag

>> No.8168736

>>8168124
w2c?

>> No.8168742

>>8164996
why's that

>> No.8168759

>>8168480
the hoodie sure, but not the shoes bud.

>> No.8168766

>>8168063
N
just get a plain black bomber + put patches on it if you'd like

>> No.8168782
File: 13 KB, 480x360, 1729-90704-p.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168782

y / n

>> No.8168787
File: 136 KB, 620x805, fiasco-magazine-black-block-white-riot-6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168787

>>8168124
Reminds me of that CP company jacket. Would look out of place anywhere but a smog filled city in Asia....

Or paris.

>> No.8168804

>>8168528
id cop em

>> No.8168805

>>8162623
bottom right are currently being sold on ebay

>> No.8168809
File: 55 KB, 450x266, VansOSWhiteLeather.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168809

>>8168782
Clean, safe. Prefer the low's in leather. Just my two cents. Typing compensates for everyone sleeping. This is nice.

>> No.8168814
File: 242 KB, 1920x1440, 2525071-p-4x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168814

>> No.8168829

>>8168814
Reebok classic trainers> those sneaks. Can be picked up for like 50 $ on the bay. U won't regrit it.

>> No.8168835

>>8168809
w2c

What type of vans are these exactly?

>> No.8168838
File: 76 KB, 800x534, 2759a800 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168838

>>8168829

these?

>> No.8168840

what is the silhouette like on Stan Smiths?

I lost my common projects in baggage recently, kind of considering just replacing them with these.

How chunky are they though? They almost look as chunky as like vans in the pictures, which worries me.

>> No.8168848
File: 62 KB, 1392x1095, $_57[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168848

>>8168840
forgot pic

>> No.8168851

>>8168835
Uhm Old Skool - just googled 'white leather'.

VN-0D3HW00

product code. God speed.

>>8168840
Bit more rounded, bit higher. Nose is slightly 'bloated' like those OG 80's adidas sneaks.

>> No.8168863
File: 46 KB, 545x409, palacexreebok.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168863

>>8168838
I meant these.

Footlocker might have em still too. Worth checking out. Leather isn't bad too, for a 70$ RRP shoe.

Phew. Getting a bit shaky.Time for bed Had fun, good night American-/fa/. One love.

Oh and those palace x reeboks r worth checking out. Can't remember the name, but google is your friend. Reebok should get more love.

>> No.8168865

>>8168851
Since you seem knowledgeable - think I'll be disappointed if I replace CPs with them?

>> No.8168879
File: 56 KB, 632x422, 8b22c090-4d64-4bd0-9704-623f0c64f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168879

cop or not?

>> No.8168884

>>8168865
Mmm, if you don't mind not flaunting with 'made in italy margom cupsole' shoes. Pretty different shoe though. CP's are marvelous, no denying that. A bit stale - perhaps. But clean and well made. I just...don't really like the way they look when worn. Too flat. Not very comfortable too.

Acne Adrians or SLP 1's are a better substitute but if you just want a clean, white, good looking shoe for a decent price, and some casual summerwear. Stan smiths- hands down.

>> No.8168891

>>8168879
>glued sole
the leather is probably shit too

>> No.8168897

>>8168879
>>8168891
yeah go with canvas, the leather they use is shit

>> No.8168900

>>8168884
Fair enough. Thanks. And I really liked my CPs, I just don't see spending $400 again. They were only a year old, and they were nice, but just not..y'know..$400 nice. I'll totally be on the lookout for used ones in my size at the ~$200 price mark, but I don't want to wait for that because it's summer and I'm going to be wearing white sneaks like every other day. My baggage insurance didn't cover nearly the cost of what I lost, so I'm figuring out where to cut when replacing.

>> No.8168917
File: 104 KB, 1280x851, dsc_4969.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168917

>>8168809
i don't like the leather vans uses and kind of like the black old skools better, honestly

>> No.8168946

>>8168900
I get it, i paid 75 e. for a pair of achilles lows in black during 'the italian webshop of which i forgot the name ' fuck-up (error in pricing) and i still look at em and think to myself that i shouldn't have bought them.

>>8168900
Stan Smiths mate. Good shoe, inexpensive so you don't have to worry about them and pretty easy to replace if needed. Brought roshes and raf velcros on my last holiday. Wore the roshes down to shit, not a worry in the world and my velcros ended up taking space and getting nicked from the hotel room.

Roshe 1- Velcro 0

>> No.8168958

>>8168917
It's up to you. Just sharing my preference but none the less both options are v.decent imo. Must be added that those are a bit more common - you'll bump into em more in your day to day business. Still, trivial things.Rhinos, that's something to worry about.

>> No.8168972

>>8168946
Just can't figure out what to wear with cps.

Jeans? Chinos? Wool trousers? High cuff? Low cuff? pinroll. Socks? No socks? Tried it all, enchanted by none.

>> No.8168988
File: 117 KB, 1023x683, DSC_7312_57af4851-ee2e-43d1-9f09-6447f564f489_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8168988

These caught my eye after looking at Puma's suede midtop offerings.

Also, does everyone usually prefer Solovair over Doc Marten because Doc farmed out to Chinese leather? Been looking to cop a pair of Made in UK Docs too.

>> No.8169001

>>8168958
very true, they are more "normal" i suppose, more conservative and popular as well. both pairs are definitely nice though

hippos more so! they kill more than rhinos, i believe

>> No.8169016

>>8168988
Quality difference between made in China/ Thailand (or vietnam) / UK is very.very.very.very minor to be honest. Wouldn't bother too much about it, price/quality is still decent. Regardless of the switch: a very durable shoe.

I'm shitting up this thread. Talking to myself. Heart pounding. And it's nearly morning. Rly time for bed :* xx

>> No.8169025

THFKDLF: Cop or not?

>> No.8169115
File: 214 KB, 1012x943, raised_by_wolves_ss14_collection_x-82_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169115

>> No.8169125

>>8169115
The black one is nice and simple. I dig it.

>> No.8169131

vans sk8 hi in black colorway.

cop or not?

>> No.8169144

>>8169115
>>8169125
yea, go black

>> No.8169157

>>8164540
w2c pair on the left?

>> No.8169159

>>8169144
will he go back

>> No.8169180

>>8163393
it's a uniqlo basic fucking zip up hoodie

why the fuck would you need anybody to advise you on whether to buy a 20 dollar blank hoodie

>> No.8169189

>>8164540
black during the winter
neither work during the summer, it's too hot
but if you cop black, make sure to black out all the white stitching

>>8169157
you have got to be fucking kidding

>> No.8169205
File: 33 KB, 475x600, 1398479758247.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169205

>>8169157
nigga are you retarded

>> No.8169242
File: 101 KB, 1000x1500, mzz96871_black_xl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169242

cop?

>> No.8169252

anybody tried uniqlo light wash jeans?
specifically
>http://www.uniqlo.com/us/men/bottoms/jeans/skinny-fit/men-skinny-fit-tapered-jeans-086395.html#61
or
>http://www.uniqlo.com/us/men/bottoms/jeans/slim-fit-color/men-slim-fit-color-jeans-087455.html#50

>> No.8169255

>>8169242
depending on price, would cop

>> No.8169258

>>8169252
>/jeans/skinny-fit/
don't

also
>>8169025
pls respond

>> No.8169266

>>8169255
>$45 aud

>> No.8169269

>>8169258
>/jeans/skinny-fit/
>don't

can you expand? are they ridiculously tight / not tight enough / do they make your legs look awful?

thanks for the response

>> No.8169271
File: 76 KB, 960x278, uniqlo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169271

>>8169269

>> No.8169300

>>8163729
its only 29.90 m8

>> No.8169324

>>8162133
they all look like Nikes aka shit

>> No.8169426

>>8169125
>>8169144

yeah i was thinking of getting black
not feelin top right?

its grey naturally and lights up like that when artificial light hits it. is it too much?

>> No.8169434
File: 54 KB, 600x600, Shell.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169434

Shell jacket. Would it be dumb to buy another jacket when the weather is getting warmer? Or could i wear this even through warmer weather?

>> No.8169560
File: 73 KB, 779x813, 23.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169560

cop or not? any inspiration fit?

>> No.8169575

>>8169434
w2c

>> No.8169580

>>8169560
get the all blacks and paint pen the contrast stiching if u get sk8 his

>> No.8169594
File: 43 KB, 640x575, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169594

Should i cop these?

>> No.8169599
File: 162 KB, 1024x1024, kentwang.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169599

>> No.8169607
File: 407 KB, 507x596, Screen Shot 2014-04-30 at 5.33.29 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169607

>> No.8169608

>>8169594
cop

>> No.8169610
File: 156 KB, 813x358, Screen Shot 2014-04-30 at 5.40.28 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169610

>>8169599
or these
stan smith

>> No.8169620

>>8169607
cup

>> No.8169621
File: 226 KB, 645x520, Screen Shot 2014-04-30 at 3.46.59 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169621

should a nigga?

>> No.8169626

>>8169621
or should i go with the T

>> No.8169627
File: 242 KB, 630x536, Screen Shot 2014-04-30 at 3.49.29 AM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8169627

>>8169626
forgot picture

>> No.8169633

>>8169621
>>8169627
I like the idea of that print on a tee better, but the ironic moonrunes ruins it
so just go with the sweater

>> No.8169637

>>8169608
will do

>> No.8169640

>>8169637
i regret not buying them when i had the chance, you can do some really nice things with them

>> No.8169660

>>8169621
>>8169627
both of these are trash. please dont

>> No.8170046

>>8162190
if you're looking for boots then go for 1460s then lmao 1461s aren't boots

>> No.8170384
File: 79 KB, 830x352, copornot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8170384

Bonjour /fa/ I'm so confused
I want a millitary black boot and am not sure if those one are too much clown !

60 € in lieu of 185 € they were wore only once based on the description, and are french made not sure of quality tough but gotta be better than chinese crap.

Man I wish I had the money to own a pair of dayton service boot.

>> No.8170578

>>8167575
Fuck you those are mine!

>> No.8170770

>>8170046
i said im looking for boots or derbies ...are 1461s not derbies?

>> No.8170865

>>8168782
those are the textile version.
so shit compared to the all white leathers.

>> No.8170905
File: 189 KB, 1080x720, lol5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8170905

Do I return these jeans? I cant tell if they make me look really gay.

>> No.8170909
File: 197 KB, 1080x720, lol6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8170909

>>8170905

>> No.8170926
File: 206 KB, 1080x720, lol7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8170926

>>8170909
they're growing on me

>> No.8170984

>>8170926
w2c hoody

>> No.8170988

>>8170984
supreme walking the dead, dropped 3 weeks ago

>> No.8171062

>>8170988
err dead kennedys even

>> No.8171150

>>8170926
you should layer more with these pants

also if you lost just a little weight on the legs, the pants would be perf

>> No.8171181
File: 16 KB, 250x250, constanza.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8171181

>>8170926
>that fit
Dressed be le meme internet :)

>> No.8171369

>>8165628
w2c?