[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 24 KB, 570x381, myadidas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7984304 No.7984304[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Settle an argument for me - are these shoes /fa/?

>> No.7984311

>>7984304
>adidas
>effay
No.

>> No.7984325

>>7984311
That's a pretty stupid thing to say, it depends on how you wear it and what with.
besides your forgetting all the colabs they do

>> No.7984413

no, get stan smiths

>> No.7984512

>>7984304
Superstars?
Maybe a decade ago.

I think I started wearing them in 2001. Bought a pair every couple of years when the old pair disintegrate purely out of habit and to have some non-athletic sneakers as an option.

But no, I would not consider them /fa/.

>> No.7984533

Jesus no, can't you see the toe.

>> No.7984557

>>7984311
the new adidas ZX's are sick though.

>> No.7984760
File: 215 KB, 460x690, sup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7984760

>>7984304
gonna bump with inspo

imho i think they look fine for street wear in certain fits

>> No.7984762
File: 105 KB, 480x640, shell.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7984762

>>7984760

>> No.7984764
File: 56 KB, 408x543, superstar2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7984764

>>7984762

>> No.7984766

Back in 2007 maybe.

You might pull them off in a formal streetwear fit. Creamy brown chinos might go well.

>> No.7984772
File: 44 KB, 858x572, 1395582916410.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7984772

>>7984311
Someone's forgetting.


>If I can get the fit right, I'm considering copping these.

>> No.7984773
File: 200 KB, 800x1161, sup2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7984773

>>7984764

>> No.7984780
File: 94 KB, 533x800, superstar2 white.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7984780

>>7984773
last one

>> No.7984797

>>7984780
Nice.

I was convinced these shoes had their time but a couple of these are convincing me otherwise.

>> No.7985161

>>7984304
get gazelles or sambas, superstars are kinda fred durstish

>> No.7985298

>>7985161
what does fred durstish mean?

>> No.7985372

>>7985298
pretty sure your mother had one too many visits from fred durstish to retain an air or respectability in the neighborhood.

>he's your real dad

>> No.7985442

>>7985372
but he is my dad

>> No.7985632
File: 20 KB, 381x380, 80 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7985632

>>7985442

>> No.7985650
File: 140 KB, 809x207, raf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7985650

>>7984304

no but these are

>> No.7986174
File: 104 KB, 503x600, 1395600945642.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7986174

I think they are. They are incredibly comfy looking, for fits like that i like them x10 to the stan smiths. The thicker sole looks so much better imo.

>> No.7986319
File: 266 KB, 1483x1014, squatz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7986319

Good for squats

>> No.7988682

>>7985650
thos are fred durstish as fuck

>> No.7989821

>>7986319
B-b-but what if I don't lift...?

>> No.7990513

>>7984772
Kill yourself if you weren't joking.

>> No.7990542

>>7990513
>not liking Radidias

>> No.7991133

>>7989821

you do now son

Go do gym faggot

>> No.7991223
File: 2.22 MB, 384x288, 1395670282228.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7991223

this thread