/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.7529611]

Who's Picasso of the fashion world? Who's Henri Matisse? Who's Yves Klein?

[Anonymous No.7529628]

>>7529611
>implying we know anything about art or fashion
top kek

[Anonymous No.7529657]

Raf Simons, Rick Owens, and uh... hmmm...

[Anonymous No.7529667]

like aesthetically or contributions to the period?

[Anonymous No.7529672]

>>7529611
in what way?

[Anonymous No.7529678]

Kawakubo is Picasso obviously

[Anonymous No.7529680]

>>7529672
Surprise me.

[Anonymous No.7529709]

>>7529657

lol - pleb tier shit.

[Anonymous No.7529716]

>>7529611
yo-g yamamotorbike

[Anonymous No.7529723]

It's really hard to say, chronically you could say that Demeulemeester, Margiela = van Gogh. But how would it fit stylistically?
You couldn't realistically say that Yoshi is Picasso, or could you?

Can you compare Lagerfeld or Tom Ford with Klimt?

There are parallels, but they just don't feel right. Fashion is highly dependent on the marketing too and promises something, that clothes alone cannot deliver.

The contrast gets starker if we don't limit these thoughts to paintings - art is being expressed in sculptures, performances and media in general. I rather feel the top designers are actually making every day art and enrich our experience that way .

PS: written while waiting for my zara and cos items.

[Anonymous No.7529728]

>>7529723
>implying
but i could

[Anonymous No.7529744]

Picasso is probably CCP.

[Anonymous No.7529756]

hmmm i don't know much about paintings but i know a little about architecture

i would say hedi slimane is similar to james stuart in that james stuart pioneered greek revival neoclassicism and hedi brought back skinny jeans and slim elongated silhouettes

[Anonymous No.7529757]

>>7529728
Yamamo and the 2 Belgians obviously have studied Deconstructivism and the modern art history. So they are setting in later than turn of the century art - much closer to their own time.

But should their clothes be called abstract? what would they stand for? it just doesn't feel right to me. They are practically much closer to architecture or every day goods still. it's called "designer" for reason.

[Anonymous No.7530556]

Patrik Ervell probably Constable

Ann D is Caspar David Friedrich

Prove me wrong bitches

[droak No.7530577]

I love to compare designers to authors or painters, first to come to mind as picasso would be issey miyake or rei kawabuko.

[Anonymous No.7530598]

>>7529744
>Picasso is probably CCP.

[Anonymous No.7530603]

>>7529611
Mind if we get some definitions going?

For me at least, Picasso = Tom Ford, talented, but also extremly famous, conceited, conscious of their fame, and too many hack-ish tendencies

Kawakubo = Matisse, also obviously talented, famous only in a (very slightly) more restricted medium, progenitors of massively influential movements in their fields (or at least they get that label retroactively applied to them)

Klein: don't know anyone as revolutionary

[twerk it No.7530615]

>>7529723
i'd compare tom ford with damien hirst. i wish both would just stop. i certainly think klimt deserves better.

[14thlevelmagicuser No.7530637]

>fashion is art

lol ok then.

[Anonymous No.7530651]

>>7529611
picasso...bernhard willhelm
matisse...walter van beirendonck or henrik vibskov, maybe
yves klein...no idea man

[Anonymous No.7530659]

>>7530603
eh, picasso is more like john galliano by your definition, kawakubo must be compared to some deconstructionist artist, idk who. i was trying to match visual styles >>7530651

[Anonymous No.7530708]

>>7530637
u left ur trip on
ur not an /fa/ trip are you?
if u are ur not a very good one, never herd of u

[Anonymous No.7530715]

Damien Hirst = Rick Owens

[Anonymous No.7530735]

You idiots can't compare artists to fashion designers. It doesn't work that way.