/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.7236058]

Considering the influx of all of this technology-based fashion (gothninja, techninja, lunarcore), is there any chance for an opposing movement that works with wizard fashion?

pic is maybe an example, core being robe-based and accessorizing. Wands, brooms, cauldrons, etc.

[Anonymous No.7236063]

[Anonymous No.7236066]

This is what I'd imagine a "Basic" look would involve, notice sparse use of accessories (materials pouch and staff.) but also incorporating the less-seen horn.

[uuuuhhhh No.7236071]

no because this "influx" is exclusive to kids on /fa/ who want to feel included in s/t

[Anonymous No.7236072]

>>7236071
yeah but that doesn't mean we can't make it happen

[Anonymous No.7236078]

the actually-existing opposite movement is the heritage trend

but as far as movements that aim toward something pre-industrial... I don't know. I don't think that's a thing.

[Anonymous No.7236080]

like lunarcore, most successful and all socially acceptable fits would require a fuckton of toning down. if you have a good cision and good execution and know the boundaries, you'll be fine

but you probly need to be old enough to grow a really good beard

[Anonymous No.7236083]

>gothninja
>technology-based

you're gonna have to explain this one to me

[Anonymous No.7236086]

What about elf-like fashion?

[Anonymous No.7236087]

>>7236080
beards basically make or break the look.

Beardless can try out for a sorcerer style but I think that's gonna require more leather.

[Anonymous No.7236090]

I really loved those Hogwarts uniforms

[uuuuhhhh No.7236093]

>>7236072
yeah ok I'm sure u can get some dumb kids to post fits and get ridiculed and then move on to the next "movement"
or just buy and wear what u like and stop trying to label urself

[Anonymous No.7236104]

>>7236093
get on my fucking level

[Anonymous No.7236102]

>>7236093
dr_seuss_ss02.gif

[Anonymous No.7237475]

>implying Druidcore is not superior