[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 693 KB, 720x720, PhotoGrid_1383200780233.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7167483 No.7167483[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

I recently copped these. should I resell and cop some givechy or keep?

>> No.7167554
File: 120 KB, 1057x700, 1382565311901.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7167554

what are they? look cool to me, reminds me of these which i don't have an ID on

>> No.7167561

those have the resale value to cop Givenchy?

they do not look very nice at all

>> No.7167612

Looks... interesting, i'd think they'd look good with some leather

>> No.7168970

I forgot to mention the details on the does. They're extremely rare Urban stranger sneakers. They are very high quality. When I found it, had all the original tags and everything. $780. It's all leather. I planned on keeping the shoe but I like some givenchy high tops more.

>> No.7168975
File: 29 KB, 440x239, sk8 hi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7168975

hahah they look like absolute shit.

Vans Sk8 Hi's with longer laces tied around the shoe look 10x better

>> No.7168982

>>7167483
they look like the kind of shoe i would have worn in my skater black and white checkered days

>> No.7168981

looks like cheap shit,
It is cheap shit
I guess abozt 40$
you aint fuggn wit me

>> No.7169012

>>7168975
Listen pal, I never said it didn't need new laces. I tied it like that so others could see what they could do with the shoe.

>> No.7169020

>>7167483
They look awful ;_;

>> No.7169032

>>7169020
What about it looks awful to you? Is it the laces?

>> No.7169043

>>7169032
NOt him, but they look like cheap shoes you get anywhere. I don't see what's good about the qualitywise, not stitched and the fabric doesnt look that nice either (cant see much on that pic anyway)

>> No.7169072

>>7169043
I'll take better pictures so I can try to capture how great the quality is. I am also going to post them in a fit. But I have crappy jeans. You'll just see. You will all see.

>> No.7169086

What's the brand?

>> No.7169113

>>7169072
Nice trolling bro. Keep it up.

>> No.7170713

http://imgur.com/a/3Z190
Those are the new pictures of the shoe.

>> No.7170745

did you get these at walmart?


did you get your jeans with them free as part of the deal?

>> No.7170781

the logo on the front of the tongue and on the heel look like All Saints branding except it's not

they're a chinese knock off of All Saints

a quick google (well, not even that quick as the brand is so fucking irrelevant I had to click on more than 1 link to find anything by it) tells me that a similar pair of shoes they have retails for $54

you could maybe afford the laces of a givenchy pair with $54

>> No.7170795
File: 13 KB, 633x758, 1381374877816.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7170795

>yfw those shitty a1923 sneaks look pretty much identical

take off the logo, distress em a bit and sell on ebay for thousands op

>> No.7170826

>>7170795
THAT"S WHAT I'M SCREAMIN!
/Fa/ is strange. They go insane over some shoes that like this if it was ricky or somebody.
But are quick to call em all kinds of junk because they aint never heard of it.

>> No.7172085

w2c?

>> No.7172096

>>7170826
for some, fashion is more than just protecting yourself against the elements and mimicking cheaply some designer pieces...

It's like when you're collecting Pokemon cards or sports memorabilia etc. you don't want a shitty print of a first edition Charizard or a replica of a Barry Bonds homerun ball... you want the real thing.

>> No.7173523

>>7172096
It's not replica or something like that.

>> No.7173538

>>7170826
screaming that you're a fuccboi.

>> No.7173557
File: 732 KB, 802x1069, P8307965-Kopie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7173557

>>7170795
they look hardly the same

>> No.7173693

Ur buggin OP

http://www.lifestyleunrated.com/urbanstrangerblack.html

>> No.7174753

>>7173693
>mfw those aren't even the same shoe
>mfw mine don't have even a little patent leather

I've seen those before. They're nothing like the shoe I got.

>> No.7174791

>>7173557
w2c

>> No.7174792

Dude, those sneaks suck. You could cop geos or visvims for that price. Leather looks thin and cheap. Sole looks worse than cons/vans. Sell them now!

>> No.7174806

>>7170795
>>7170826

I don't see the similarity. Eyelets, zippers, laces, color, distressing, branding...I mean, I guess they're the same rough shape? Anyone able to help me out on this?