ADIDAS X RAF SIMONS

File: 151 KB, 1024x683, adirafresp2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

ADIDAS X RAF SIMONS Anonymous Mon Oct 21 15:56:23 2013 No.7110603 [DELETED]

Adiraf thread
please post all pics you have here, pics of actual fits seem to be rare
If you have them please don't be scared to post a fit~

>>	Yawn Mon Oct 21 15:57:22 2013 No.7110613 www.hanon-shop.com/search.php?mode=search&page=1 Every colour way going for £80

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 15:58:52 2013 No.7110623 >>7110613 it's bare annoying how it still shows the out of stock sizes also http://www.crookedtongues.com/store/brands/adidas-raf-simons

>>	Yawn Mon Oct 21 15:59:52 2013 No.7110631 >>7110623 ur the only person ive ever seen say bare on /fa/ i use that word way 2 much irl lol which part of london r u from?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:01:22 2013 No.7110645 What's the cheapest anyone has copped these for on ebay? I want em

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:08:53 2013 No.7110691 >>7110631 don't live in london atm but from SE and moving back next near :) ppl think i'm being ironic lol but it's just a good word >>7110645 you aren't gonna get them any cheaper than the links a couple of posts up

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:11:23 2013 No.7110708 File: 478 KB, 607x607, 1377428747552.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Can anyone identify these sweats?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:19:57 2013 No.7110774 These shoes are ugly and anyone who likes them is a fucking sheep.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:42:14 2013 No.7110910 >>7110774 sry i can't live up to your standards

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:44:43 2013 No.7110927 >>7110603 do these run a little large? i usually wear a 9/8.5 but they only have the 8 in stock

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:45:13 2013 No.7110944 >>7110927 nah a little snug if anything :( i felt they were tts in the shop but some sites say to size up

>>	tomato Mon Oct 21 16:47:43 2013 No.7110957 >>7110613 omg is this shit legit?

>>	tomato Mon Oct 21 16:48:44 2013 No.7110965 >>7110957 wait... >out of stock FML UGH ;_;

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:48:44 2013 No.7110967 >>7110957 i ordered so i hope so :P

>>	The The !dhCjd/jy1E Mon Oct 21 16:50:14 2013 No.7110982 >>7110623 >>7110613 FUUUUCK. I am broke as a joke right now and don't get paid for another week and a half. I am so pissed

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:56:43 2013 No.7111011 File: 27 KB, 450x450, 502975838_product_3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7110623 >>7110613 >neither have the goat colorway why

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 16:58:44 2013 No.7111027 >>7111011 crooked did b4 but i missed out on my size copped my second fave tho so its all gd

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:01:44 2013 No.7111053 >>7111027 just gonna have to try and grab em real quick if end has a sale

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:06:14 2013 No.7111089 >>7111053 they seem to be selling out p fast on the more "fashion" sites so i wish u luck

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:10:14 2013 No.7111132 >>7110957 Yes, Hanon is legit

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:10:43 2013 No.7111126 what's the sizing on these?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:11:13 2013 No.7111140 >>7110982 same boat man same fucking boat

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:12:13 2013 No.7111150 >>7111126 size up half size there was a sufu thread where this guy said that a uk 11.5 would fit anywhere between 10.5 and 11.5

>>	Σ▼ƦƟ/ƒ▲/Ğ Mon Oct 21 17:13:13 2013 No.7111152 File: 11 KB, 501x585, Jewcartoon.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7110982 Buy mine, 1 421.45375 Israeli Shekles.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:20:13 2013 No.7111227 >>7111150 that' nice it's versatile would rather wear it a bit tight than a bit loose imo

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:32:44 2013 No.7111329 >>7111152 kek

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:34:13 2013 No.7111337 File: 348 KB, 1632x1224, rafs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Here's me in mine.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:38:43 2013 No.7111361 File: 97 KB, 640x480, rickadidas-sneaker2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] superior adidas collab coming in a couple of months

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:46:13 2013 No.7111404 Ozweegos or responses? which is more /fa/

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:48:44 2013 No.7111419 File: 55 KB, 570x400, 1382303854061.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Ugh which colorway to get? also would these be good to actually run in?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:48:44 2013 No.7111420 >>7111337 Look's horrible.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:49:14 2013 No.7111430 >>7111404 I love the chunky presence of the response 2 but both are sick.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:49:45 2013 No.7111424 >>7111361 do people actually wear this shit?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:49:45 2013 No.7111428 >>7111361 sometimes i see them at an angle that makes me think 'oh yeah ok i kind of dig it, they look a bit cooler than i thought'. Then i see pictures like that and laugh at the people buying them who are stuck with such a ridiculous shoe.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:50:43 2013 No.7111434 I don't really get why you like them

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:51:13 2013 No.7111436 >>7111419 Not for running

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:51:43 2013 No.7111437 >>7110965 the other site has them

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:51:43 2013 No.7111438 File: 298 KB, 500x498, 9NuZkQL.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7111361 looks better laced i think i think the lighting is really bad for that pic or somethign, they look really cheap there would pay more than like $150 probs

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:52:44 2013 No.7111452 File: 237 KB, 600x800, rickadidas-sneaker4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7111424 >>7111428 ;) epic

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:52:44 2013 No.7111453 >>7111337 Looks v good. Saw a guy in London wearing a pair today, looked nice in actual use.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:53:14 2013 No.7111455 >>7111452 probably some of the ugliest footwear i've ever seen

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:54:13 2013 No.7111461 File: 157 KB, 1000x667, rickadidas-sneaker5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7111455 thanks for sharing your opinion

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:58:14 2013 No.7111484 File: 25 KB, 400x400, D6639820-01[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7111420 tspf >>7111453 Thanks. They definitely look even better in real life. >tfw I just bought another pair in pic related colourway

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 17:59:14 2013 No.7111491 >>7111461 thank's for sharing your overpriced ugly shoes

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:02:13 2013 No.7111502 >>7111461 I love the rafdidas but I can't say the same about these. They look really low-quality to me, and I don't care for the silhouette.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:02:14 2013 No.7111508 countdown to mass shit fits w/raf sneakers 3 days and counting

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:49:21 2013 No.7111727 i am so upset they were out of stock holy fuck

>>	tomato Mon Oct 21 18:51:22 2013 No.7111739 >>7111484 dat pink tho gl pulling it off

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:51:51 2013 No.7111737 >>7111727 which website?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:54:21 2013 No.7111748 >>7111484 should i cop these ones? my thinking is i can always sell them for more than i bought them if i dont like them right?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:55:21 2013 No.7111752 >>7111748 uh no why on earth would you think that

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:55:52 2013 No.7111757 >>7111752 not him but because they are on a massive sale atm lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:57:22 2013 No.7111765 >>7110603 those are some of the ugliest shoes ive seen what separates those shoes from whatever some fat physics major wears? i feel like an outsider looking at geos or something here

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:58:21 2013 No.7111767 >>7111765 dude try to find a physics major show that looks anything like it they are totally unique

>>	tomato Mon Oct 21 18:58:51 2013 No.7111769 >>7111748 naw they are the worst ones dats y dey on sale

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:58:51 2013 No.7111770 >>7111765 what motivates people to continue making this exact same post? i really just don't get it

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 18:59:21 2013 No.7111774 >>7111769 but they all been on sale m8

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:03:52 2013 No.7111798 >>7111770 the piping, the mesh, the lack of geometry, it's just a fucking mess. they look like $30 shoes to me. i hope you didn't buy them looking for complements?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:04:51 2013 No.7111811 >>7111798 >lack of geometry wtf does that mean lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:05:21 2013 No.7111816 >>7111769 they were one of the two defining pairs of the show tho >>7111752 >>7111757 yeah u idiot they will go on ebay for over £100 at least

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:07:52 2013 No.7111829 >>7111011 >>7110603 these two are def the goat rafdidas models the response 2 /w yellow on the sole is p cool too but never see it anywhere

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:15:51 2013 No.7111871 File: 1.46 MB, 1936x2592, 1378623951486.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I really liked this fit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:16:51 2013 No.7111875 File: 171 KB, 1200x800, adidas-by-raf-simons-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] literally how would anyone wear these shoes

>>	cosmicbutts !!qblBZSgYzBX Mon Oct 21 19:16:51 2013 No.7111877 >>7111871 i did too

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:18:21 2013 No.7111897 >>7111875 on feet? ?

>>	tomato Mon Oct 21 19:20:21 2013 No.7111915 >>7111871 the pants kill it imo

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:22:21 2013 No.7111921 >>7111915 kill it as in >nigga gucci killed it on the track or >damn they put cherries in that killed it for me :( ?

>>	tomato Mon Oct 21 19:24:52 2013 No.7111939 >>7111921 kill as in fit is kill o no pant kill fit die ;_;

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:26:52 2013 No.7111946 >>7111765 listen you fucker im a physics major and don't wear ugly shoes

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:26:52 2013 No.7111954 >>7111939 i think the jeans look v cool

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:27:21 2013 No.7111959 >>7111946 post a fit physboi

>>	leisuresuitlamy Mon Oct 21 19:27:21 2013 No.7111960 >>7110708 I really like these but that's it tbh someone post that dip dye fit I need a laugh

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:30:51 2013 No.7111985 >>7111897 but with what they dont go with anything

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:31:52 2013 No.7111990 File: 178 KB, 460x307, RAF_4_460.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	tomato Mon Oct 21 19:33:52 2013 No.7112006 >>7111954 nothing wrong with the jeans just don't go with the rest imo >>7111990 jizz

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:38:40 2013 No.7112025 File: 215 KB, 690x1035, s104-gry_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Everyones sleeping on raf x asics.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:40:10 2013 No.7112030 >>7111875 >literally backtoleddit.jpg >>7111871 I bet this dude saw A$AP Rocky wear these on Instagram and decided to hop on the trend. What an absolutely distusting fit.

>>	tomato Mon Oct 21 19:40:11 2013 No.7112031 >>7112025 get away from me im not ur frand

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:40:11 2013 No.7112037 File: 394 KB, 200x163, 1361405981167.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7112025

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:40:11 2013 No.7112038 >>7112030 he posted it before the asap pics i think

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:42:10 2013 No.7112049 >>7112038 Pretty sure the A$AP pics went up before they even went on sale (in July or something). But that's beside the point. I just think the shoes look really out of place with his swagcore fit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:42:40 2013 No.7112046 File: 138 KB, 960x408, raf-simons-018.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7112031 WHY?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:44:10 2013 No.7112062 >>7112049 how is it swagcore raw denim a CE hoodie it's not like he's wearing a chicago bulls snapback, stussy tee and plant life socks lol

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:46:10 2013 No.7112071 File: 487 KB, 920x609, rafsimonsadidas_r2_c1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7112046

Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:49:10 2013 No.7112084

>>7111748
Yeah, sure. They go for around $ 100-200 on Ebay right now, but maybe the sales around the web will drive the price down.

>>7111739
Thanks, tomato. Although I don't appreciate the lack of cute MS Paint pictures.

>>7111765
When people on /fa/ criticize the rafdidas' and other unusual pieces of footwear, you only have to look at any WAYWT thread to realize, just how poor taste the average /fa/ poster has, and how little weight its opinion holds. Don't hate just because some people don't wear Red Wings, Fly Knits or CDG Play(ed out) Chucks.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:52:40 2013 No.7112095 >>7112049 >>7112038 >>7112030 post aspa pics of him wearing rafdidas?

Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:54:40 2013 No.7112101
File: 87 KB, 500x475, mdwDaBo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7112062
How on Earth can you determine that those jeans are raw? Even if he has managed to get those fades, the jeans don't go with the shoes.

I didn't know what CE was, but after googling it, I can safely say that it is 100 % swagcore garbage.

>basic as fuck hoodie with obnoxious print
>light coloured jeans
>obnoxious bracelet
>ugly phone cover
>not swagcore

If it's you on the picture, than just know, that I don't hold anything personal against you. I just think you wasted a cool pair of sneakers.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 19:56:11 2013 No.7112105 >>7112095 on insta: /p/btyofBha4B/#

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 20:06:41 2013 No.7112140 File: 39 KB, 500x375, 1376981576475.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] are these on sale anywhere other than the 2 links at the beginning of the thread?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 20:08:12 2013 No.7112145 >>7112140 They are a couple on ebay right now

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 20:12:11 2013 No.7112168 >>7112140 Rick looks jaundiced as fuck here, steve jobs must have really got on the goof swag train

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 20:17:41 2013 No.7112177 File: 224 KB, 620x400, dtgfb_screenshot20130925at6.18.58pm_722635.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7112095

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 20:23:11 2013 No.7112203 File: 191 KB, 1023x683, raf-simons-adidas-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7112071

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 21 20:39:42 2013 No.7112252 >>7112203 is this colorway available on sale in 11 or 12? my average shoe size is US 12. what size would i get for these?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 01:14:48 2013 No.7113680 File: 481 KB, 1280x853, raf-simons-x-adidas-2013-fall-winter-footwear-collection-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Bumping for full fits.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 01:29:19 2013 No.7113753 >>7110613 >only go up to 11 >not even 11 is in stock fuck me sideways

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 02:28:12 2013 No.7113992 File: 473 KB, 1280x853, raf-simons-x-adidas-2013-fall-winter-footwear-collection-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7113680

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 02:31:56 2013 No.7114006 File: 84 KB, 640x854, 1364703319745.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7113680

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 02:42:26 2013 No.7114053 File: 460 KB, 1280x853, raf-simons-x-adidas-2013-fall-winter-footwear-collection-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114006 Those aren't rafidas, but whatever

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 02:54:13 2013 No.7114075

>>7110603
normally i can understand weird or trendy stuff, but i really dont understand these shoes. like they do look a bit like some sneakers you would see on some 80s hottest clips show with like horrible vlip and word art flying around, not that that concept couldnt be cool but just that i dont see how you would work these into a fit and have it look good to anyone who didnt know what they were

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 02:56:13 2013 No.7114085 File: 451 KB, 1280x853, raf-simons-x-adidas-2013-fall-winter-footwear-collection-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114075 How does someone knowing what they are contribute to how the fit looks?

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 02:59:43 2013 No.7114091

>>7114085
well like if anyone who visits fa saw them, they would know that that person could possible have bought them because of knowledge of fashion or raf or something.

So like if you were walking the streets and you saw them you might appreciate them more than someone who doesnt follow fashion

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 03:00:43 2013 No.7114092 >>7114053 They are.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 03:04:13 2013 No.7114105 File: 446 KB, 1280x853, raf-simons-x-adidas-2013-fall-winter-footwear-collection-6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114092 No they aren't they're RAF paneled sneakers, not Rafidas.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 03:10:42 2013 No.7114119 File: 443 KB, 1280x853, raf-simons-x-adidas-2013-fall-winter-footwear-collection-7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114105

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 03:22:43 2013 No.7114136 File: 620 KB, 1280x853, raf-simons-x-adidas-2013-fall-winter-footwear-collection-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114119

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 03:29:50 2013 No.7114148 I just can't find these appealing, no matter the fit. The people who wear them try so hard, but in the end, these shoes look like shit. These shoes look like something a four-year-old would wear. They're ugly in every way.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 03:47:23 2013 No.7114189 >>7114148 yep

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 03:54:53 2013 No.7114210 These look like the kind of shoes a stereotypical downs-syndrome kid would wear to school.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 03:59:22 2013 No.7114228 >>7114075 >2013 >dressing for anyone other than yourself

>>	trunks !!SE08Bv/gZZR Tue Oct 22 04:01:22 2013 No.7114237 >>7114148 >>7114189 no one cares about your opinion

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 04:01:23 2013 No.7114231 >>7114148 B-b-but I want to look like a four year old (somewhat)

Starfucks 64 !!9K82DbNiFMK Tue Oct 22 04:01:53 2013 No.7114236

>>7114148
you aren't wrong, but they are still awesome shoes and i am gonna cop the ones in OP pic eventually.
there are some good posts ITT explaining why they are cool, and me talking about fashion is like sieg talking about anything OTHER than fashion so i won't even attempt to explain it.

it's like every bad running shoe, mixed with your childhood memories and adult desire to own crazy things.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 04:03:23 2013 No.7114241 >>7114237 ouch ;_;

>>	Starfucks 64 !!9K82DbNiFMK Tue Oct 22 04:09:53 2013 No.7114264 >>7114236 has the great Ralph Simon ever talked about his "vision" for these shoes? i have some ideas about what he was thinking, but I want to know what he says. or just his outlook towards his aesthetic in general.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 04:16:19 2013 No.7114281 >>7114264 He ddi the pinafore/jumper thin for ss14 based off of baby rompers, it's inevitable he derives some inspiration from what you said before too.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 04:18:18 2013 No.7114287 File: 151 KB, 1024x683, AAD66405_RF61.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114264 A lot of his stuff is inspired by his idea of the future, and the cliche futuristic designs of the 80's and 90's I'm pretty sure.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 04:31:49 2013 No.7114318 >>7111770 because the only thing that separates these from all black new balances for neckbards and old is the color combination, a combination which isn't even a far cry to expect from a fat old man or neckbeard

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 04:34:48 2013 No.7114324 >>7114237 You forgot to say "whatever, nerds" like you always do, you vacuous fuck.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:02:50 2013 No.7114384 >>7114318 i always see people type this but i've never seen a pair of new balances that look anything like adirafs please post the pair u think do

Starfucks 64 !!9K82DbNiFMK Tue Oct 22 05:22:51 2013 No.7114434

>>7114287
yea that's how i feel about a lot of his stuff.

someone thought about the "future" and then thought of how to market it and sell it to the masses.

he thought about the "future" and made exactly what he thought of in his mind. running shoes will still look ugly in the future.

the only thing i don't like about them is they look like they are high quality. i know that they ARE high quality, but if these were truly from the future they would be average quality, since they would be average shoes.

i know nobody feels me on this, but tonight im actually posting about fashion. i don't know why.

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:28:20 2013 No.7114449

>>7114434
have you had a look at them in real life?
they aren't high quality (i think they are made the same as reg adidas), it just might look like that because the design is so fantastic
straight up i think they might be my favourite sneakers of all time
i don't even think they are ugly, they are beautiful

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:30:07 2013 No.7114451
File: 116 KB, 1000x1334, 10468689_2372113_1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7114434
I like the fact that they look like they are high quality because it gives the impression of better technology, when combined with the over the top designs it kinda parodies running shoes these days that have rediculous designs claiming to help you run / perform better.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:31:37 2013 No.7114453 >>7114449 >i don't even think they are ugly, they are beautiful Agreed. My appreciation of them isn't ironic.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:32:07 2013 No.7114455 File: 222 KB, 1000x667, adidas-springblade-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114451 pic related

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:34:54 2013 No.7114465 File: 371 KB, 1280x853, adidas-x-raf-simons-springsummer-2014-collection-derriuspierrecom-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114453 Same. What do you guys think of the 2014 collection?

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:38:24 2013 No.7114477

>>7114465
It seems a lot more accessible. Not as thoroughly Nineties as the current collection.

They don't really have the same charm and aesthetic appeal to me. The type of colourscheme they have is something you see a lot in fashion sneakers these days (think the colourful versions of Nike Lunar and its ilk).

I might change my mind upon seeing them in a fit or in real life.

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:40:38 2013 No.7114488

>>7114465
not him (i'm the guy he quoted) but i don't really dig them at all
i like the way the originals are very out-there but quite subdued and i like the influence from hiking trainers, which i don't see in these
they are too consciously futuristic and obvious imo, not nearly as subtle and interesting

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:44:08 2013 No.7114503 >>7114455 damn that's fire

Starfucks 64 !!9K82DbNiFMK Tue Oct 22 05:49:08 2013 No.7114515

>>7114465
i don't like that colorway, but otherwise it's really cool.

it's not as easy to wear as the other ones, and i'm not feeling the strap but damn, i really like them.

personally i wouldn't cop them, because they aren't my style.
i wish they were though.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:56:38 2013 No.7114529 >>7110603 I bought these. Does anyone have fit pics with this particular model (Reponse 2)? And, do you guys think that these have any resale value?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:57:08 2013 No.7114537 File: 308 KB, 900x660, raf-simons-adidas-originals-2014.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114515 Thats probably my favorite colourway the pink looks a lot better than the pink in the 2013.

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:59:08 2013 No.7114544
File: 242 KB, 1280x1731, Raf-Simons-2014-adidas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7114529
I don't know if about resale value but if this thread survives for another day or so i might post a fit. I just wear basic crap with them though. Like a black or maroon shirt with pinrolled dark denim.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 05:59:38 2013 No.7114542 >>7114537 Oh wow, he really is going another way with this one. I don't like it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:00:08 2013 No.7114550 File: 33 KB, 640x373, blogger-image-321303983.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114542 I really like the two on the left side, and I'm considering copping bottom left.

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:01:38 2013 No.7114552
File: 153 KB, 1365x2048, rick-owens-for-adidas-2014-spring-collection-derriuspierrecom-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7114537
Looks like he chose some standard adidas shoes and slapped shit on them.

Same thing with the Rick collab. Looks like standard adidas with cancer.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:05:39 2013 No.7114557 File: 66 KB, 863x576, adidas-raf-simons-02-863x576.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114552 I don't see any adidas in that. Looks like roshes with cancer.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:07:08 2013 No.7114563 >>7114529 should sell for at least a bit more than you paid for it if you got it on sale

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:10:08 2013 No.7114569 a-anyone has another wesite selling them on sale ?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:10:08 2013 No.7114573 File: 155 KB, 863x576, dd1qdomz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114557

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:12:09 2013 No.7114580 >>7114573 what\s yr point

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:15:39 2013 No.7114584 File: 369 KB, 1280x853, raf-simons-for-adidas-2014-spring-summer-collection-9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114573 I was talking about the ricks.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:16:09 2013 No.7114588 these new ones look like some ugly ass ferragamo <luxury> shit lmao

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:16:09 2013 No.7114589 >>7114557 hhng these are giving me a real de sthijl vibe.I could work the pink ones better imo. The plastic guard reminds me a lot of a helmet visor, thats cool

>>	Yawn Tue Oct 22 06:18:38 2013 No.7114591 >>7114584 i quite like these giving off a sick robot pilot vibe thing

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:22:08 2013 No.7114608
File: 47 KB, 900x599, raf-simons-adidas-spring-summer-2014-13-900x599.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7114589
The pink ones just look better in general. The colours just work really well together. Also I really like the boots but Im not sure how anyone would pull them off.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:23:38 2013 No.7114612 File: 181 KB, 1400x1900, kbbjbj.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114584 When I saw the Ricks I immediately thought of shoes like in pic related. Theres a adidas shoe that looks exactly like the Rick one without the tumors.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:24:09 2013 No.7114619 >>7114612 w2c

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:40:09 2013 No.7114649

>>7114451
>glue stains all over
>high quality

Not really.
But I think the act of successfully advertising a product which is so ugly and make dumb people eventually buy it because of its brand is an act of high art in itself.

Besides I can imagine some of the designs to go with that sea punk wave.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 06:41:08 2013 No.7114656 >>7114649 these are nothing like seapunk lol what are you on about that was years ago anyway lol

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 07:13:59 2013 No.7114737 >>7114557 wen r these out

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 07:30:30 2013 No.7114776 >>7114569 pls

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 07:32:29 2013 No.7114779 File: 528 KB, 704x399, sodope.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114737 February 2014 i think

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 07:41:29 2013 No.7114798 File: 110 KB, 500x333, tumblr_inline_mrl00vhY2L1qcs89s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Anyone tried experimenting with lacing on these?

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 08:38:04 2013 No.7114947

from another thread:

"
you have to look at it from the design perspective to fully appreciate these, I think. imagine you're on raf's design team and are given the task of developing a sneaker that is modern and cutting edge, like the rest of the clothes your brand produces... what do you do? you know that athletic/running shoes are in style at the moment due to the deluge of fits with roshes, frees, etc found on tumblr and the like. what did those running shoes do to become popular to the point where they are acceptable with "smart" (i.e. dressy) outfits? they took the cluttered look of asics or every other running shoe pre-2010 and simplified the fuck out of them. so what do you do as a "high fashion" brand that challenges conventions? you move in the opposite direction. rather than simplifying, you introduce more glossy blocks of color. at the same time, you show that you're innovative by completely flipping the script on what colors are used. instead of bright hues, you choose maroon, dark navy, olive. of course you throw in some pink and whatnot to keep things interesting.

"IN CONCLUSION" it's basically flipping the script on what the "pleb" brands, such as nike, have done to make running shoes appealing to the public over the last couple years, and it's fucking amazing/brilliant imo.

YES these shoes are supposed to be ugly to a certain extent. that's the conceit of it all. but at the same time they combine interesting colors and textures that work amazingly with an otherwise simple fit."

good post imo

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 09:35:21 2013 No.7115130 >>7111361 Muh tech wear grail

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 09:48:21 2013 No.7115165

>>7114947
But in reality, you're paying a high amount (for sneakers, retail price anyway) for these and they're difficult to pull off unless you've bought into the whole Raf Simons lifestyle look. So in a sense, I agree, but in another it's a sign of opulence. It's for the Raf club. In my opinion, this whole "fashion" sneaker thing has gone too far. But what do I know?

With all that said, I've learned to like them.

>>	Gaspard Tue Oct 22 09:50:21 2013 No.7115170 >>7112025 These are gr8 >>7112031 >>7112037 r trippin

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 09:53:21 2013 No.7115177 >>7115165 they're still on sale for 75 pounds m8

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:00:51 2013 No.7115186 File: 94 KB, 1024x682, raf-simons-for-adidas-2014-spring-summer-collection-3-1024x682.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114798 bump

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:02:51 2013 No.7115194 File: 39 KB, 500x353, r01omsn121014040-r1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7115170 The ankle cover makes them though, they wouldnt be anything without it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:04:23 2013 No.7115199 >>7115165 Its a myth that they are super hard go pull off.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:09:21 2013 No.7115206 File: 208 KB, 730x475, tumblr_mmlju9JCeD1qm2e7zo1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7115194 If, unlike the adidas, you can run in the asics collab they would definitely be cool with some running tights.

>>	Gaspard Tue Oct 22 10:11:22 2013 No.7115212 >>7115194 The Neoprene ankle cover is so gr8

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:20:42 2013 No.7115225 >>7110623 copped happy birthday to me

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:22:11 2013 No.7115239 Any other sales going on? Out of stock in good sizes on Hanon and CT.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:23:12 2013 No.7115243 >>7115225 feel sorry for you

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:24:41 2013 No.7115247 >>7114779 bruv i cant wait that long

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:29:41 2013 No.7115268 File: 30 KB, 576x323, asap-rocky-fashion-killa-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7115247 Gives you time to save up, or cop pieces to go with them. A$AP Rocky's colour co-ordination in the fashion killa video is insane with his 2014 rafs.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 10:51:13 2013 No.7115328 >>7115165 > this whole "fashion" sneaker thing has gone too far. But what do I know? eh?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 11:44:16 2013 No.7115510 bump

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:07:19 2013 No.7115602 >>7115268 do you really think he dresses himself

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:20:50 2013 No.7115660
File: 8 KB, 241x228, 1379944687182.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7110613

HOLYFUCKKKKKKKKKKKKK /FA/

IM EXTACTIC IM FUCKING EXTAITTINFIPDNSIGPNDSIPNGIOSDNHIGONIOHDFNIFHDNIHDFNHIN AHAHAHAHAHA
A
AHAHAHAHAHAHAA

THT WAS THE LONGEST FUCKING ORDER I HAVE EVER DONE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HOYL SHIT IM ACTUALLY FUCKING SWEATING

THJANKNYOU SO MUHC YAWM IFNSDPFNIPDSFIOSDIGDIPGDIPGJIPDJGIDPGJGI HOLY SHIT I AM FUCKING DEAD I DEAOMDMPIANFIDSNIGPDNPGHNDIFHFI
HI-DJH
IFDJH
IJFHI-FDJI-HJFIFDJHI-FDJH
D

GIN
GJDOF
HJFO
DJHO
FDJH
IFJHI
FJDO-
HJOFIJO
FJ
PHJF
HJF
DPHJ
FDHJO-FDJHPFDJHIPDJFHPO
JFDS
HJOFD
HJFO
PDHJO
DFJH
ODFJH
ODFJHO-

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:21:20 2013 No.7115666 >>7115660 meh the ones left are in shit sizes and bad colourways

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:23:19 2013 No.7115671 >>7114947 This is so fucking contrived lol. There's nothing worse than an artist who leaves his works interpretation up to the fanboy. Nigga is over here creaming himself over some damn running shoes.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:23:49 2013 No.7115672 >>7115666 >shit sizes they're only shit if you aren't them lol

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:23:49 2013 No.7115674 [DELETED]

File: 1.99 MB, 350x300, M2RRmMS.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7115660

PIC RELATED IS MY FACE NOW

FUCKKKKK ZEBRA KATZ TO FUCKING CELEBRATE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-JdoWgf-y4

FUCKKKKKKK AHHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA PYSCHOTIC C

SLEW FAM IN THE FACE

CRAZY TITCH

free crazy TUITCH

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:24:49 2013 No.7115678 >>7115671 lol u fucking idiot

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:24:49 2013 No.7115679 >>7115672 sorry i don't have midget feet

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:33:21 2013 No.7115705 7.5 UK WAS ONLY LEFT I AM SIZE 8UK IN NIKE FLYKNITS AND FREE RUNS DID I DUN GOOF OR DO GOOD

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:40:22 2013 No.7115717 >>7115705 I heard they run small you might be fucked

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:42:22 2013 No.7115721 >>7115705 herd snug rip

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:46:51 2013 No.7115733 >>7114947 read this in this voice: http://vocaroo.com/i/s1QIyurDtfJO toppest lel

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:47:21 2013 No.7115738 >>7115717 >>7115721 they run big you jealous big foot faggots!!!!!

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:50:51 2013 No.7115746 File: 178 KB, 1213x600, okay.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7115738

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:51:51 2013 No.7115755 >>7115746 owell if they do not fit i can sell them for loads more

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:52:22 2013 No.7115759 >>7115705 if were you mate i'd try to do a trade /w someone if you could otherwise you'll still be able to sell for more than you paid prob

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 12:56:52 2013 No.7115774 >>7115705 I MEAN IT'S WEIRD ACTUALLY BECAUSE I FIT INTO A SIZE 7 UK NIKE DUAL FUSION RUNNING SHOE AND A UK SIZE 7 CONVERSE TOO

>>	Gaspard Tue Oct 22 13:15:11 2013 No.7115843 >>7115755 u cunt, I sent the link 2 my crush hoping she'd buy a pair, she said she would, they were in her size too :(

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 13:20:10 2013 No.7115869 >>7110603 Why are those better than pic related?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 13:21:12 2013 No.7115873 File: 40 KB, 480x320, 0407.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7115869 bleh

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 13:22:12 2013 No.7115874 >>7115843 she got big feet not worth it mate jk but i hope you have a nice time together without the shoes :P

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 13:23:42 2013 No.7115881 >>7115873 uuuuh cause they look nothing alike lol

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 13:41:11 2013 No.7115960 >>7115843 thats wot u get for negging me on sufu u fat cunt

>>	Gaspard Tue Oct 22 15:04:32 2013 No.7116298 >>7115960 LOL sorry

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 15:05:01 2013 No.7116310 File: 993 KB, 250x250, 1380360510792.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7115960

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 15:12:02 2013 No.7116344 >>7115177 but not in any sizes. unless i missed something.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 15:36:01 2013 No.7116466 >>7114465 nxt lvl

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 15:56:51 2013 No.7116574 >>7115869 >>7115873 because they say raf simons on them I love them though

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 17:04:21 2013 No.7116964 >tfw price for some on ebay went up 150 bucks in the last 10 seconds thought i was gonna get them for $120 fuck

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 18:52:15 2013 No.7117576

>>7114451
>>7114451
if this thread is still going on, someone show me the cheapest place to cop this pair, and also other colorways of this model.

these are different than the ones on the sale site and for some reason it's hard finding the exact info on them VS the other ones.

to be honest, the pink stripes in the back kill the ones in OP pic for me. it's weird because in some pics the plastic part looks pink and in others (like OP pic) it looks green.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 18:55:45 2013 No.7117600 File: 152 KB, 1000x1334, 10468689_2372111_1000 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7117576 Are you colour blind?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 18:58:15 2013 No.7117621 >>7117600 that is the version im looking for, but the one in OP pic is the one that looks pink and green.

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 19:01:44 2013 No.7117634
File: 118 KB, 1000x1334, 10466088_2346047_1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7117621
I know, I'm nut sure if we're looking at different pics or not but the bubbles are light blue, the shoe is maroon, blue, and gray. The stripes on the back are green.

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 19:27:44 2013 No.7117782

>>7117634
ok we probably are looking at different pics or something.
basically i like these:
>>7117634
but i thought the back was pink, so i decided to go with these:
>>7117600

and i thought the back was pink because the ones on this site are pink
http://www.hanon-shop.com/adidas-raf-simons-response-1.html

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 19:29:14 2013 No.7117791 >>7117782 Those are response 2, the ones you linked are response 1. Notice the green sole and different shape.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 19:41:46 2013 No.7117859 >>7117791 is there gonna be a resonse 3?

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 19:54:07 2013 No.7117905
File: 216 KB, 1280x853, a-further-look-at-the-raf-simons-for-adidas-2014-spring-summer-collection-video-00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7114557
>>7114465
>>7117791
Those two are the new response models, not sure if they will be called response 3.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 19:56:36 2013 No.7117914 >>7117905 I prefer the old collections to the 2014 ones tbh. Hope more sites put them on sale in the next couple months. Definite cop.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 20:14:37 2013 No.7117975 File: 1.47 MB, 3032x2560, sadasdfucku.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7113680

>>	tomato Tue Oct 22 20:19:06 2013 No.7117991 >>7117975 is this you omg i'm totes buying these now what is ur tts and what size u get how do they feel/fit

Anonymous Tue Oct 22 20:19:36 2013 No.7117994

why are these going on sale some places? weren't they just released this f/w? is the cycle just shorter for shoes?

or are the two places they went on sale just trying to move stock?

basically asking if we can expect these to go on sale everywhere soon or not?

>>	None !HATEDjgkJA Tue Oct 22 20:20:36 2013 No.7117997 File: 63 KB, 533x800, 1039418.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 20:21:37 2013 No.7118003 >>7117975 hahahah

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 20:22:06 2013 No.7118014 >>7117994 I just thought they were getting ready for the new collection or something. Wondering the same though, hoping somewhere like End of FarFetch puts em on sale soon.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 20:22:36 2013 No.7118009 >>7117975 >basic boi

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 20:24:07 2013 No.7118021 >>7117991 Yeah, i got UK 9 and I'm usually UK 8.5 - 9. They are pretty comfy and they only fit small length-ways in my experience they are quite wide.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 20:30:06 2013 No.7118045 >>7111438 What the hell they actually look good would cop/10

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 20:43:06 2013 No.7118097 >>7115602 I thought he was in an art high school and focused on fashion, so I guess he could dress himself

>>	tomato Tue Oct 22 20:54:55 2013 No.7118135 File: 11 KB, 400x400, its clobbering time!.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7118021 oh ok im a 10.5 US should i get a 44 then? those are the exact ones ill get. do they fit a half size small like other ppl say?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 20:59:25 2013 No.7118149 >>7114584 these are super cool futuristic lines and textures and reimagined shoe closure? sign me up

>>	tomato Tue Oct 22 21:10:40 2013 No.7118193 >>7118135 pls rspnd i draw pic 4 u, if u rspnd

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:11:40 2013 No.7118196 >>7118135 i don't know if they fit like regular adidas, but adidas are always a size big for me.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:12:11 2013 No.7118202 >7118135 get a 45

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:28:42 2013 No.7118265 44* thought you said uk

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:35:10 2013 No.7118299 >>7114947 'work amazingly with an otherwise simple fit' okay, someone show me a good fit with these. not a shot of their trousers and shoes like ppl are creaming themselves over an actual good fit each one so far itt has been laughable

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:38:44 2013 No.7118320 >>7118193 not the same guy, but I'm a size 11 and bought a 44 and they fit a little snug. they should probably fit you fine. it also says size 10 US on the inside of the shoe.

>>	tomato Tue Oct 22 21:44:43 2013 No.7118357 File: 8 KB, 400x400, shrimp salad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7118320 >>7118265 >>7118202 thank you i draw pic 4 all of u

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:50:43 2013 No.7118400 File: 823 KB, 2448x3264, bab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] better than rafdidas 8)

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:52:14 2013 No.7118413 File: 21 KB, 455x475, 374768_mrp_ou_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7118299

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:52:43 2013 No.7118411 File: 1.38 MB, 500x559, 1379384785936.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7118400 oh hey its the dude with like 2 pairs of shoes

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:53:13 2013 No.7118419 File: 20 KB, 455x475, 374765_mrp_ou_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7118413

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:54:43 2013 No.7118423 >>7118400 lel Need some new tennis shoes for my club team. Are asics /fa/?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:55:13 2013 No.7118424 File: 18 KB, 455x475, 374767_mrp_ou_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7118419

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:56:14 2013 No.7118431 File: 20 KB, 455x475, 374766_mrp_ou_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7118424 I have actual fit pics @ home but i currently cannot access them atm

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 21:58:44 2013 No.7118441 >>7117975 looks like shit, buy better jawnz first

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 22:01:14 2013 No.7118463 >>7118411 i have 4 pairs fyi

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 22:02:14 2013 No.7118467 >>7118423 What racquet do you use?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 22:27:02 2013 No.7118618 >>7118441 whats wrong with his jeans?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 22:36:02 2013 No.7118682 >>7112101 >doesn't know sk8thing >can't into post-internet CE is the future of streetwear u luddite

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 22 23:47:08 2013 No.7119071 >>7118441 wtf it looks good

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 00:31:00 2013 No.7119244 bump for more fits

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 00:38:31 2013 No.7119266 bump

Starfucks 64 !!9K82DbNiFMK Wed Oct 23 00:44:31 2013 No.7119292

>>7119266
nobody is gonna post fits.

i don't know if it's because nobody has the shoes, or if they just can't make a good fit with them.

most likely they are too self conscious about trying to impress /fa/ and afraid of criticism.
that's a big problem on /fa/
i know it's good to be honest, but not enough people give compliments so it seems only the most negative people post.

a good example is these shoes because there are some really vocal haters. they are eagerly anticipating someone posting a fit, so they can criticize it.

the people who like the fit won't feel as obligated to post props, but if they do it will be overshadowed by the really hateful posts.

i would love to see more pics with these shoes though.
i'm planning on wearing mine to the gym, and even running in them.

Anonymous Wed Oct 23 01:08:31 2013 No.7119420

would it be worth e-mailing ssense, oki-ni, etc. and saying "hey I saw the rafdidas went on sale at a couple of sites like _____ and _____. will you guys put them on sale before f/w sales as well?"

or would they just brush my q off?

or if anyone knows a site that has really good customer service, I'll give it a go now.

>>	SWIGGITY SWAG WHATS IN THE BAG !vou5G2A3Q. Wed Oct 23 01:09:30 2013 No.7119427 Cheapest place to cop these? Keep hearing about them going for >300 but all I van find are them around 400.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 01:24:01 2013 No.7119500 >>7119292 well what did you think of this? I thought it was pretty good. >>7117975

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 01:25:31 2013 No.7119508 >>7119420 they aren't going to so it doesn't really matter if you ask

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 01:38:01 2013 No.7119547 >>7119508 then why are other places putting them on sale? seems like maybe the new sneaks will be here before s/s, and that's why this stuff could go on sale early.

>>	appearance Wed Oct 23 01:55:01 2013 No.7119603 >>7112025 fuck these under a blacklight fuckkkkkkk

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 02:11:31 2013 No.7119657 >>7119427 WHY DONT YOU UNDERSTAND THAT > MEANS FUCKING GREATER THAN, NOT LESSER THAN

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 03:13:23 2013 No.7119849 File: 40 KB, 558x1024, 9Qtb2oEh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] bumpin w fit that hasn't been posted here

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 03:14:53 2013 No.7119855 File: 152 KB, 639x1422, nvvVeQa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7119849 wish the pants were a bit looser

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 04:14:43 2013 No.7119976 >>7119603 I would fuck them without the blacklight B^)

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 04:17:44 2013 No.7119982 >>7119849 >>7119855 fucking disgusting

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 04:22:14 2013 No.7119991 LMAO is this shit for real

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 04:28:44 2013 No.7120006 File: 404 KB, 1219x813, raf-simons-and-adidas-footwear-collaboration-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7119991 Why was this colourway never released? ;-;

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 04:41:43 2013 No.7120032 >>7119849 >>7119855 bad. nothing fits well.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 04:42:14 2013 No.7120037 >>7120006 Eurofag bought them

>>	Σ▼ƦƟ/ƒ▲/Ğ Wed Oct 23 04:49:15 2013 No.7120048 >>7120037 8)

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:09:15 2013 No.7120092 >>7117975 >>7119849 I'm not really feeling this trend of trying to colour coordinate these shoes. I think they go better with an all black fit, like >>7111337.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:11:46 2013 No.7120096 >>7119991 Let's see a fit, fuckhead. You are probably the kind of fuccboi that posts a "basic today lol" fit in the WAYWT threads.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:17:46 2013 No.7120109 File: 56 KB, 500x500, rafadidas14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] :) ootd

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:18:16 2013 No.7120115 File: 145 KB, 500x750, tumblr_mv19vnAY4S1r9dy3oo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120109 ayyy lmao

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:18:45 2013 No.7120114 >>7120092 def agree with the colour matching although i still like the fit /w the ombre sweater would be interested to see v white fits with them might look cool

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:19:46 2013 No.7120116 >>7119849 dunno why everyone shits on this, i like it

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:20:15 2013 No.7120119 File: 84 KB, 500x500, rafadidas7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120115 disgusting nigger ruins these shoes

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:21:33 2013 No.7120122 >>7120119 epic, simply epic there are two white dudes above this guy wearing them just as bad

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:22:34 2013 No.7120126 File: 18 KB, 500x500, rafadidas6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120122 But Ur Preshious DIck.... Can Be My Vibrator... (;

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:24:34 2013 No.7120129 >>7120126 i kinda like this except for the hat lol

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:25:33 2013 No.7120132 File: 34 KB, 630x405, raf-simons-running-sneakers-fall-winter-2012-14-630x405[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] where would be the best place to find a pair from raf's fw 12 collection? would it be next to impossible

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:26:03 2013 No.7120138 File: 30 KB, 400x600, 00020mx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120132 :( no idea man they r so lovely

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:26:34 2013 No.7120137 >>7120126 w2c bag

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:27:03 2013 No.7120140 >>7119849 ahhaha saved

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:28:04 2013 No.7120143 >>7120138 :( so much harder when the search terms are so vague too at least with the adidas collection they had distinct names

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:30:34 2013 No.7120146 >>7120132 >>7120138 http://www.footlocker.com/product/model:178644/sku:31609090/asics-gel-foundation-walker-2-womens/all-black/black/?cm=GLOBAL%20SEARCH%3A%20KEYWORD%20SEARCH that is literally the shoe

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:32:03 2013 No.7120152 File: 15 KB, 500x277, inconceivable.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120146 >literally

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:33:04 2013 No.7120159 >>7120146 this is dope where can i get it in 44?

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:33:33 2013 No.7120154 >>7120146 It's not, though.

Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:42:04 2013 No.7120183
File: 43 KB, 584x293, Screen Shot 2013-10-23 at 8.40.57 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7120152
>used for emphasis while not being literally true.
"I have received literally thousands of letters"

YOU are the one who doesn't understand the word, faggot.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:44:03 2013 No.7120190 >>7120183 It may be used that way, but that doesn't mean it makes any fucking sense, or that you should do it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:46:04 2013 No.7120199 >>7120190 it totally makes sense

Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:47:33 2013 No.7120200

>>7120183

that's a semantic change that has taken place and become accepted fairly recently due to people unconsciously using the word incorrectly so often. I think it sounds really dumb, like something a bratty little teenage girl would say.

>UGH I LITERALLY LOOK LIKE I WEIGH 300 LBS TODAY OMG

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:47:33 2013 No.7120202 File: 134 KB, 500x375, tumblr_mre7qi64Fj1sqfqjdo1_500[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] They look cool with a suit.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:48:03 2013 No.7120206 File: 78 KB, 570x425, asap-rocky-in-raf-simons-x-adidas[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120202

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:48:03 2013 No.7120207 >>7120190 It's extreme hyperbole. Instead of saying of saying "He has a million cars" you can say "He literally has a million cars" to make the exaggeration more extreme and humorous/silly/obvious.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:49:03 2013 No.7120209 >>7120202 >>7120206 I love the shoes but this looks awful lol

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:50:03 2013 No.7120211 File: 179 KB, 628x434, adidas-for-raf-simons-tryptic[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120119 >>7120109 >wearing them with streetwear Absolutely disgusting.

Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:51:04 2013 No.7120213

>>7120207

linguistics student here. anon that posted a few back was correct. it has only become "acceptable" because of mis/overuse. it irks me.

and yeah it's a pretty recent development: http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/15/living/literally-definition

you shouldn't use it this way because only annoying fucks do.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:53:03 2013 No.7120218 File: 337 KB, 800x1109, frederik-woloszynski-0004[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120209 Is it too nxtlvl for you?

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:53:03 2013 No.7120220 >>7120213 >mis/overuse Why are you to decide what's right and wrong? Just because a change was recent doesn't make it any less valid. Every change is recent at some point, it's just less acceptable to you because you've seen the change.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:55:35 2013 No.7120224 >>7120207 saying someone owns a million cars is extreme enough. it's already obvious he doesn't really own a million cars. "literally" does not add any humor. it's redundant and repulsive.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:57:05 2013 No.7120231 File: 110 KB, 700x1050, 6a00e5508e95a98833019aff60bcd3970d-700w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:57:05 2013 No.7120232

>>7120224
>it's redundant and repulsive.
If you don't like it, don't use it. I don't see why you'd want to limit the techniques someone else wants to use to say whatever they want to say. I find it weird how you care so much about regulating how much exaggeration is "enough" in language lol, surely that's up to whoever is speaking or writing.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 05:59:05 2013 No.7120237 >>7120231 probs the best I've seen.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:01:36 2013 No.7120245 >>7120232 I just think it's annoying okay? it's just this nondescript intesifier that comes out of peoples' mouths way too often. kind of like people that say "very" a lot. quit whining about my opinion as if you don't have one of your own.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:02:35 2013 No.7120249 >>7120232 >>7120224 >>7120220 >>7120213 >>7120207 ok guys, we don't give a shit >>>/lit/

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:03:52 2013 No.7120257 >>7120245 Okay, I get you. I just think it's a negative thing to try to restrict the way people use language. It's all good imo and can be used to good effect in the right circumstances. >>7120249 I don't read lol

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:06:21 2013 No.7120261 File: 86 KB, 1200x800, a_4x-horizontal[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120249 we literally don't LOL SEE WHAT I DID

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:07:21 2013 No.7120262 File: 63 KB, 620x629, big-sean-adidas-raf-simons[1].jpg_itok=ZWrM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] God oh God

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:08:52 2013 No.7120265 File: 187 KB, 400x600, 072613-tji-ignacio2[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This is one of my favourite fit pics of these.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:10:22 2013 No.7120267 File: 87 KB, 800x1065, 101013+8a[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:10:22 2013 No.7120268

>>7120262
tbh this is just a regular run of the mill streetwear fit and the adirafs make it better
looks better than if he was wearing jordans
i think some ppl are too snobby about these shoes like they are super high end difficult to wear shits: they are just some colourful, fun sneakers that are p nice in minimalist fits but look okay with most shit imo

Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:17:51 2013 No.7120287

>>7120268

word. if you walked past some old ass dude that knew nothing about fashion, and he glanced at your shoes... he would probs subconsciously find them more in line with hyphy streetwear shit than asics. I mean if you're wearing this you will never really end up looking like the clueless engineer that wears running shoes with errything. you'll jsut look like a hypebeast that fucked up, but at least you're trying and doing something unique.

just because they take inspiration from running shoes do not mean they are running shoes.

Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:18:52 2013 No.7120291

AHHHHH AHAHAHAHAHAHA AHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OH MY FUCKING GOD AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA THESE ARE THE BIGGEST PIECES OF SHIT I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY ENTIRE FUCKING LIFE EHAHAHAHAHAHAH THERE ARE HOMELESS PEOPLE IN MY CITY WITH BETTER LOOKING $2 SNEAKERS MY FUCKING SIDES ARE OBLITERATED, THANKS FOR THE LAUGHS /FA/ AAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:19:22 2013 No.7120293 File: 193 KB, 361x691, 1382295884779.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120291

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:20:22 2013 No.7120295 Jeezus, those things are hideous. Is this what /fa/ considers /fa/? Sincerely, /v/.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:20:51 2013 No.7120298 File: 35 KB, 450x600, raf-simons-multi-paneled-hi-top-trainer-product-4-7631792-483062461_large_flex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120291 go back to mfa pls

Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:22:51 2013 No.7120306
File: 54 KB, 700x466, shox.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7120287
i feel you
i agree with all the "ugly" comparisons but the feeling i get from these is closer to over-techy chav shoes than autistic runners
i like the way big sean is wearing them cause there's no pretension, like he just thought "wow these are some dope kicks" and to me that taps into the kind of childhood excitement these shoes bring out

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:25:25 2013 No.7120315 File: 244 KB, 960x754, 3225844_lookbook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Dope as hell.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:28:25 2013 No.7120325 >>7120315 socks are stupid, hat is stupid, necklace is stupid, tattoo is stupid. Couldvebeencool/10

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:29:25 2013 No.7120327 File: 91 KB, 500x493, tumblr_mp0pac0tcu1qe9ydgo1_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7114465 I'm liking these more and more.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:30:25 2013 No.7120328 >>7120325 Socks are fine imo, i agree on the rest

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:32:27 2013 No.7120334 >>7120315 would look dece witha plain tee of the same length and no hat/necklace

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:33:27 2013 No.7120336 /fa/ confirmed for dressing as badly as fedoramancers.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 06:39:29 2013 No.7120345 File: 95 KB, 300x381, trophy-not-like-thing[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>7120291 >>7120295

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:09:29 2013 No.7120419 >>7120327 they look way better in this pic

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:11:29 2013 No.7120425 >>7120419 Yet, they still look like shit - only a shade less revolting as far as shit goes.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:26:02 2013 No.7120462 I wish we could have 2009 /fa/ back...

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:36:18 2013 No.7120482 >>7120048 samefagging whore fagget

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:38:18 2013 No.7120488 >>7120206 awful

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:39:18 2013 No.7120492 >>7120218 amazing

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:40:18 2013 No.7120497 >>7120315 slit his throat

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:41:18 2013 No.7120500 This is a prime example on people wearing things because they're told it's "/fa/". Anyone with eyes can see how absolutely horrid those things look.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:43:47 2013 No.7120510 >>7120500 yes. because all the feedback on them is so positive... have fun in your superior rick owens.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 07:55:32 2013 No.7120539 >all over the google looking for more sales >can't find anything why am I so broke right now

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 08:11:35 2013 No.7120583 >>7120500 I love these, especially because they make austismal /fa/ posters mad

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 23 10:46:21 2013 No.7121028 bump

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/fa/ - Fashion