[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 498 KB, 262x200, 1357749023030.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6975037 No.6975037 [Reply] [Original]

What sunglasses are /fa/? raybans?

>> No.6975053

>>6975037
kuboraum
super
ksubi
grafik plastic
mykita

>> No.6975070

Ray Bans are the Converse of sunglasses. They can be pulled off by almost anyone but they keep having that basic bitch look. They also have much better alternatives for a few bucks more.

>> No.6975121

I like Retrosuperfuture but I suspect /fa/ would think they're fuccboi status.

>> No.6975551

Ray Ban clubmasters are pretty /fa/

>> No.6975567

>>6975037
tfw there don't exist sunglasses that fit my giant head

>> No.6975603

>>6975037
I have the orginial wayfairers. I think they look nice and the build quality is excellent.

>> No.6976069

ITT: Tools

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50149025n

>> No.6976074

I've got a pair of round sunnies I wear a fair bit I look like a weird cunt with em on but.

>> No.6976121
File: 24 KB, 933x525, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6976121

What about Oliver Peoples? I'm thinking of getting these

>> No.6976145

>>6976069

Everyone on here should have their cigarettes ripped out of their hands, force fed Adderal and made to watch this.

Full disclosure: I did buy a pair of Tom Ford sunglasses before seeing that. Now they're sitting next to the $5 pair I got from H&M

>> No.6976185

>>6976145
But is there any difference in lens quality?
I'm assuming a real pair of raybans, although still way too overpriced will have decent lenses, whereas a £5 knockoff from china will not.
How do the H&M's hold up when taking eye care into account? Anyone got a list of people selling actual quality products for good prices?

>> No.6976245

>>6976121
I've been looking at exactly this model, only with the matte frame

>> No.6976255

>>6976145
So why shouldn't I buy overpriced fancy sunglasses from rich men exactly?

>> No.6976295

>>6976245
I think I would opt for the matte frame too now that I think about it. My face shape calls for a square frame and almost nothing else looks right...

>> No.6976319

Louis vuitton

>> No.6976328
File: 152 KB, 557x560, 1379615744331.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6976328

I.D on these sunglasses?

>> No.6976349

>>6976185

To be honest, the Ford sunglasses are fucking amazing, the lens quality is excellent and they're sturdy without feeling heavy on my nose. I got them on discount but they were still over $100. The H&M sunglasses have paint chipping off the sides (I wear these more than the Fords for obvious reasons) but the lenses are just fine. I've gotten more compliments on the Fords, but I personally think the H&Ms fit my face better

>>6976255

This heaven gives me migraine

>> No.6976380

>>6976328
Shit by My Asshole x My Asshole

>> No.6976405

hollywood roger club

>> No.6976419

>>6976328
>>6976380
www.ray-ban.com/usa/sunglasses/rb3016/1145o5

>> No.6979281

>>6976419
Those look like they have different temples than in the picture, and I thought clubmasters were smaller than in that pic