Levi's

[Anonymous No.6676465]

Can we discuss Levi's 511 and 510's? What does /fa/ think of them. Personally I like them and copped a pair of 11's today and have no regrets.

[Anonymous No.6676471]

user is apparently so tiny that 510s fit like normal pants on him

[Anonymous No.6676481]

510s aren't tight enough, that's why I wear Topman spray-on skinnies

[Anonymous No.6676479]

>>6676471
God damn

[Anonymous No.6676515]

I don't like the back pocket stitching (or any back pocket stitching for that matter). the black 510s with black stitching are bearable I guess (a couple friends have those; not sure if they do the same for 511s, but prob)

I also find that 511s are too baggy (and the rise should not be so homo for a pant that's not very skinny). and I find 510s to be too skinny.

but I'm pretty picky so I taper uniqlo slim fits.

[Anonymous No.6676541]

>>6676515
>I also find that 511s are too baggy (and the rise should not be so homo for a pant that's not very skinny). and I find 510s to be too skinny.

i had the exact same problem. but i found the solution to the right fit
- h&m high rise skinny fit pants

i shit you not, fit like a charm & cheap as dirt

[Anonymous No.6676581]

>510
>511
what's the difference?

also, what does /fa/ think of CIPO & BAXX

[Anonymous No.6676587]

>>6676581

[Anonymous No.6676599]

>>6676587
so... cipo & baxx = no?

i've got a really nice dark brown jacket and need jeans to match.

[Anonymous No.6676619]

>>6676471
Hello hungry skeleton

[Anonymous No.6676628]

>>6676541

yeah I'm down with higher rise slim/skinny stuff but can't get down w/ h&M quality. plebiest ill go is qlo

[Anonymous No.6676634]

>>6676581

[User !2XhiKUKGEo No.6676636]

>>6676619

jokes on u im actually kind of chubby

[Anonymous No.6676638]

>>6676628
you cant even tell with plain black jeans.... use them as beaters
you're missing out m8

[Anonymous No.6676641]

>>6676636
Don't lie void, I've seen your chest

[Anonymous No.6676643]

>>6676634
saved and thank you.

sfw /fa/ gurl for your troubles.

[Anonymous No.6676646]

w2c cheap levis 510 28x30 jet that ship to nz?
or online retailers that sell levis in general i guess

[Anonymous No.6676656]

Can we have more fits of 511 and 510

Curious to see how they fit on everyday people and not models (where they tend to look like they are wearing 511's too loosley and 510's too tightly)

[User !2XhiKUKGEo No.6676665]

>>6676641

ive only posted fit pics, never photos of my chest though

not chubby = size 26 dior homme 17cm's imo, i only can fit 28's.

[Anonymous No.6676678]

>>6676665
>28's.
You're like 5' 10 right? I guess that's pretty average

[User !2XhiKUKGEo No.6676703]

>>6676678

yeah pretty average actually, but i eat lots of food and have never really dieted/worked out so thats prob. why. 5'9'' 125lbs

here is a clearer pic with the same levi 510. keep in mind they are super worn, and were less baggy when i originally got them

[Anonymous No.6676704]

>>6676665

post a chest pic

[Anonymous No.6676707]

>>6676634
aren't the 521's discontinued? those were good since they tapered.

[Anonymous No.6676715]

>>6676634
>high rise
>low rise

please forgive my absolute dumbness but is that refering to the belt line?
and if so is there a general standard that high-rise=girl's jeans because they sit above the hips and low-rise=men's jeans?

agiain, sorry for dumb question. i don't get out much.

[Anonymous No.6676718]

510s are my favorite fitting pair of jeans I've tried so far, I've got a couple pairs. 511s are too tight on my ass not slim enough in the calves.

[Anonymous No.6676723]

>>6676581
would not cop even if you payed me to wear them

[User !2XhiKUKGEo No.6676735]

>>6676715

the rise measurement refers to the position they sit on your abdomen. high rise means the distance is longer, and the top of the waistband is closer to your true waist, and a low rise means the distance is shorter, nearer to your hip.

[User !2XhiKUKGEo No.6676738]

>>6676735

sorry the rise = distance from the bottom of the crotch to the top of the waistband.

[Anonymous No.6676746]

>>6676735
>>6676738
thanx!

[Anonymous No.6676752]

>>6676707
nah, the 508 is the new tapered fit

[Anonymous No.6676762]

>>6676715
i used to have a good technical illustration but i can't find it so here is a sketch from a how-to-draw-manga book instead

[Anonymous No.6676756]

I'm pretty loyal to Levi's. I've got a couple pair of Hedi era Dior jeans, but day to day I prefer Levi's. Really versatile since lately I prefer dressing down. I probably have a good 30 pairs of Levi's since you can cop em for like $20 on sale. Skating and late nights leave them pretty shredded or well worn and after a year or two I turn em into cutoffs. 510s def have more tapering under the knee, but after a couple months they tend to stretch pretty heavily.

[User !2XhiKUKGEo No.6676771]

>>6676746

no problem

[Anonymous No.6676780]

>>6676762
this is awesome and exactly what i needed.

i think i want low rise to make my bulge look bigger.

THANX!!

[Anonymous No.6676799]

>>6676762
Hip is god tier.

[Anonymous No.6676814]

How much should Levi's cost?

[Anonymous No.6677349]

>>6676814
they're usually $30-40 USD

i hear they're really expensive in europe though

[Anonymous No.6677371]

i like my 510s, but oh man it would be GREAT if levis made pants that are an inbetween of 510s and 511s.

[Anonymous No.6677447]

>>6677349
they're like €50-€60 here in ireland

[Anonymous No.6677462]

>>6677371

funny thing is from a design perspective there isn't really enough of a difference to merit a 510.5 jean. we are all just super picky. the difference is literally like an inch through the leg. it's interesting how it can feel so different to us

[Anonymous No.6677471]

>>6677462
saint laurent makes

19cm
17.5cm
16cm
15.5cm

cuts

there is enough difference

[Anonymous No.6677480]

>>6677471

well yeah if you're a more "high fashion" designer it makes sense because that's the entire spectrum you're working with. keep in mind levi's also does 501s and even more relaxed fits, so they are probably never going to make something between a 510 and 511.

I just tapered a pair of jeans myself and it's amazing what starting at the knee and going down to a single inch skinnier at the ankle will do to fit.

[Anonymous No.6677486]

>>6677462
just do moar squats&oats to fit into slightly larger jeans.

also, i'm a self-confessed pleb who knows shit about this stuff but i;'ve always considered levi's to be the working man's jeans and not really upper-tier /fa/.

i'm looking for high fashion jeans. any suggestions?

[Anonymous No.6677494]

>>6677486
from cheap to $$$

apc
acne
dior
saint laurent
balmain

[Anonymous No.6677503]

>>6677494
thanx! googling all of that stuff now.

[Anonymous No.6677518]

>>6677503
you'd probably be better of reading up on them in the threads on superfuture/styleforum

[Anonymous No.6677531]

>>6677518
will do!

a good place to start. thanx!

[Anonymous No.6677536]

>>6676471
>mfw 510s fit on me like this as well

[Anonymous No.6677589]

quick question about hems: stack 'em, roll 'em, or get 'em tailor cut?

i've got short legs so jeans are always too long. i usually just let 'em stack.
pic unrelated.

[Anonymous No.6677605]

>>6676471
>>6677536
i share this feel as well, and it is a mighty terrible feel

[Anonymous No.6677645]

>>6677589
depends on what you want. if a cleaner look fits you then roll/cuff them or get them tailored if you want to get really clean and commit to it, stacks vary the silhouette and have a different feeling

[Anonymous No.6677660]

I have 511's and they look pretty good but HOLY FUCK THEY GET THE WORST KNEE BAGS.

[Anonymous No.6677747]

>>6677645
cool. so stacks aren't completely out of the question and considered anything like mid-nineties dad-tier.

thanx!

[Anonymous No.6677778]

>>6677747
as long as the jeans fit. a lot of people say stacks look best on skinny jeans but they can look good if done right on baggier jeans, just know what looks good before trying this and do it with jeans that fit

[http://www.last.fm/user/Plaisa(...) No.6677804]

i got some 511 olive pants (not jeans) and they are nice!!

[Anonymous No.6677810]

>>6677778
>a lot of people say stacks look best on skinny jeans
that's awesome news! i've got pretty good cycling legs that i wanna show off so skinny jeans are on the radar. stacks are just easier.
roll up's remind me of the eighties. pic related.

[Anonymous No.6677826]

>>6676581
Maybe if I lived in Idaho and I wanted to get cowgirl pussy I'd wear them.

[Anonymous No.6677836]

>>6677826
point taken.

thanx for the feedback.

[Anonymous No.6677838]

>>6677810
yeah you really are only pushing 80s with a cuff thats more than like 3 inches wide, otherwise you are usually safe

[Anonymous No.6677840]

>>6677836

I don't want to be an asshole.

Just sayin that they look like some of the jeans that rednecks who live near me wear. Y'know, the guys who wear shirts with energy drink logos and shitty flat brim hats.

[Anonymous No.6677892]

>>6677838
>[cuff width guide]
that's important info that i would never have considered. thanx!

>>6677840
yeah, i get what you mean. they're basically for people (like me) who have no real idea about fashion and think "well, they look different and they're expensive so they must be cool rite". that's pretty much the novice level i'm at right now.

>lost 45 kgs
>need whole new wardrobe
>shut-in with no sense of /fa/