[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 11 KB, 333x250, COPS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673432 No.6673432 [Reply] [Original]

Didn't see one in the catalog.
You know the drill.

>> No.6673446
File: 53 KB, 650x650, 7956_f3ddb79991-big.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673446

i'll start. leaning towards buying this.

>> No.6673455

>>6673446
u the same guy who posted about it before

>> No.6673467

>>6673446
Fits a lil big so be skinny and wear skinny pants

>> No.6673464

>>6673455
nope

>> No.6673483
File: 16 KB, 300x250, banana's can't stand up.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673483

>>6673464
o ok
- its not a slim fit (But there is a drawstring at the bottom)
- the hood looks kind of funny (pointy)
- Its impervious to moisture release w/ the exception of the vent at the back

but +100% resistance to rain

>> No.6673482 [DELETED] 
File: 34 KB, 521x461, ss (2013-08-11 at 01.18.07).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673482

I want to buy these so bad but I don't know what the sizing is like on Margiela boots. I wear a 44 in Margiela sneakers do you think these would run the same size or would they be a bit bigger?

>> No.6673487

>>6673483
btw the impervious to moisture release bit is a bad thing
you wo n't be wearing it in warm temps anyway so w/e

>> No.6673501
File: 46 KB, 724x1086, front_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673501

cop?

>> No.6673514
File: 414 KB, 1571x2000, Unbenannt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673514

http://www.zara.com/de/de/herren/schuhe/stiefellete-kombiniert-c269239p1294529.html

http://www.zara.com/de/de/herren/hosen/weite-hose-c269234p1436164.html

http://www.zara.com/de/de/herren/t-shirts-und-sweatshirts/t-shirt-deluxe-c269237p1352075.html

>> No.6673517

>>6673483
>>6673467
thanks. haven't owned such a jacket before, would it work w/ cropped pants? in my mind having the big ass jacket and shorter pants looks good but i haven't seen examples of it.

>> No.6673524

>>6673514
>zaraninja
Lel I'd only get the tee. Also you're obv. not ready for drop crotch dnc. No to the shoes as well

>> No.6673535

>>6673524
look at that terrible assymetrical draping on the tee tho. irl that is going to look like he had a stroke. dnc aything
look at ILU sweats for entry level drop crotch

>> No.6673553

>>6673517
possible
it depends on body shape

>> No.6673562
File: 47 KB, 400x480, mens_black_tshirt_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673562

>> No.6673572
File: 249 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_2013-08-11-13-58-08.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673572

Cop or not?

>> No.6673577

>>6673553
pretty short, thin

>> No.6673585

>>6673562
lol you're killing me, you jokester

>>6673572
i don't like it personally but it's not terrible
follow your heart

>> No.6673595

w2c cheap and well fitting tees and shorts to do sports? mostly go to the gym and jogging. I want a plain but not autistic look.

>> No.6673608
File: 46 KB, 540x360, Seiko-Kojima.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673608

>>6673572
No. Wait to see if this gets rereleased.

>> No.6673617
File: 16 KB, 430x576, 71zvKdYn-uL._SY576_CR0,0,430,576_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673617

cop this?

>> No.6673624

>>6673577
I suppose it would be possible
Go look in the mirror and imagine it on you (look on google images for pics)

>> No.6673627

>>6673608
Seiko Kojima? Sounds cool, my father has a Seiko and it's never failed him, although what's the pricing of the Kojima?

>>6673572
Other thought on this?

>> No.6673634

>>6673483
>>6673487
I was the guy who posted about this jacket (actually, the 4 pocket one in black I saw in the Norse Projects store) the other day. I live in Denmark where it rains all the fucking time so I need a good simple rain jacket, but I also bike everyday so I will be disgusting if I wear this. Do you have any suggestions for jackets similar to this look, but with better ventilation?

>> No.6673651

>>6673634
Softshell if you want superior ventilation and water resistance
Hardshell if you want ok ventilation but waterproof (goretex recommended but idk)

You won't get ones with this texture cuz this one is made of a diff material

>> No.6673662

>>6673617
cop

>> No.6673660

>>6673446
Not this guy but would this be warm enough for winter? Temperatures range from 30-0 farenheit here

>> No.6673669

>>6673660
there's zero insulation
Its just a shell

>> No.6673681
File: 420 KB, 720x1280, Screenshot_2013-08-09-13-45-37.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673681

$50.

>> No.6673687

>>6673681
Are you the guy that posted this before and got ragged on? Dnc save that 50 for a better pair these flatten ur ass and have premade holes and seem cheap ugg

>> No.6673693

>>6673669
Cryy. I thought itd be a little more practical for the price

>> No.6673705

>>6673693
it is practical
its for rainy seasons

>> No.6673711

>>6673687
Got it

>> No.6673899

http://www.ourlegacy.se/store/product/long-sleeve-tee-jacquard-dots-grey-melange

But in navy blue w/ white dots...or is grey better? Or is it just shit?

>> No.6673918

where can i cop sweat pants that i can wear to school etc.?

>> No.6673932

>>6673705
WHERE I LIVE THERE IS NO RAINY SEASON IT'S EITHER HOT AS ALL HOLY HELL OR SNOWING

>> No.6673943

>>6673932
WHY ARE WE YELLING

>> No.6673953

>>6673943
The feels overcame me sry. I just want a cool rain slick.

>> No.6673955
File: 117 KB, 435x340, redwingboot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673955

$140

>> No.6673964
File: 1.70 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673964

This 8 in red wing boot is 150, great deal going on but I think iron rangers may be more
Comfy, but also 2x the cost.

Need some feedback on this one

>> No.6673969

>>6673955
I think that looks nice,
Idk what the difference in that and iron rangers are but I'd cop

>> No.6673986

>>6673964
I think it looks ugly, sorry

>> No.6673987
File: 12 KB, 300x300, sm_prod_epd_300x300_H1127-7132-34a-D001-484927.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673987

94,95 EUR
cop or not?

>> No.6673991

>>6673535
What do you mean entry level? Drop crotches don't need experience to wear

>> No.6673998
File: 1.50 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6673998

>>6673986
Don't be sorry, that's why I asked.
Also should I cop these?

>inb4 Nike pleb

>> No.6674006

>>6673964
The sole look kinda cheap to me

>> No.6674009

>>6673987
you'd look like a Union J member, so no

>> No.6674005

>>6673998
yeah, I'd cop those

>> No.6674016

>>6673998
Those are p-cool.

>> No.6674019

>>6673987
W2c?

>> No.6674027

>>6673514
cop except the shoes

>> No.6674029

>>6674019
Quiksilver

>> No.6674035
File: 305 KB, 1009x392, caps.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674035

need a lowkey black snap

>> No.6674043 [DELETED] 

Cheap spinoff MA-1 from Topman

>> No.6674058
File: 16 KB, 368x500, 897643.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674058

Cheap spinoff MA-1 from Topman

Too shameful?

>> No.6674054

>>6674035
get the HUF one

>> No.6674064

>>6674058
it's fine

>> No.6674066

>>6674058
was looking at that a couple of weeks ago, I wasn't sure about the quality it looks stiff.

>> No.6674062
File: 260 KB, 1920x2379, 5445302800_1_1_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674062

??

>> No.6674071
File: 8 KB, 211x239, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674071

Yes? No?

Brand is Junk de Luxe

>> No.6674080

>>6674071
if you're a fun energetic person who can pull it off then yes

>> No.6674073

>>6674029
Can't seem to find it. Mind posting the exact page?

>> No.6674086
File: 96 KB, 481x276, saucony.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674086

>> No.6674093

>>6674073
Sure but it's a german site:
http://www.sportscheck.com/p/quiksilver-defectors-kapuzensweatjacke-herren/484927/;pgid=topI.PiYhPhSR0EwKh0Uoo4r0000TdkK0Rlk;sid=j6Npey3EOKtpe3_DMzt-pUHO6FsAEuxL7X6o9E8Z?SortType=&PageNumber=15%2C00&PageableID=HSgKbN4LUkMAAAFAKbowIG44&PageSize=24&isRegularSearch=true&Page=1&FromSearch=true&CatalogCategoryID=&SearchParameter=%26%40QueryTerm%3Dquiksilver%2Bjacke%2Bherren%26%40Page%3D1

>> No.6674088
File: 139 KB, 683x1024, Julius_Twist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674088

For infinite stacks. Will have to work in a tech-heavy wardrobe.

>> No.6674095

>>6674062
don't buy zara
>>6674058
top man is pretty cheap..be cautious...
>>6674035
huf
>>6673955
cop
>>6673446
cawp

>> No.6674102

>>6674066
That on is from ebay.

I've seen on they site there appear to be two, only different in the color of the lining

>> No.6674120
File: 46 KB, 500x427, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674120

Thinkin about copping these for $70

>> No.6674127

>>6674120
don't

brogue sneakers are dumb, especially cheap brogue sneakers

>> No.6674131

>>6674120
What the fuck is that

>> No.6674132

>>6674086
please respond

>> No.6674138

>>6673955
I have the oxford version. I'd say no. The leather is really sub-par for Red Wing, and it's not moc toe so much as apron toe. it's easily one of the worst red wing boots.

>> No.6674147
File: 111 KB, 1000x1000, 11-02-2013_nb_1400nv_navy1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674147

>>6674086
saucony is infinitely lame

don't cop

they look like New Balance if new balance was cheap as fuck

just save up and get New Balance

>> No.6674145

also what is the quality like with Miharayasuhiro stuff?

>> No.6674157
File: 572 KB, 2000x2000, s7-1012789_alternate1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674157

$49

>> No.6674152

>>6674127
They're polo and the leather feels pretty nice. They're just on sale right now

>> No.6674153
File: 23 KB, 443x600, kektrainers.png.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674153

>>6674145
forgot pic

>> No.6674154

>>6674147
i was hoping you wouldn't say that ; ;

I have to buy some trainers ASAP as I've rekt my last pair, what should I get? preferably below £50

>> No.6674164

also what type of shoe would you class new balances/air max etc as? obviously they're trainers/sneakers but is there a more specific term I could search?

>> No.6674170

>>6674164
ehh maybe vintage sneakers or throwbacks?

>> No.6674183

>>6674154
man at that price I'd say some basic black adidas, or some of the classic nikes

triads has a great selection IMO, check there. most is around 50 gbp

>> No.6674196

>>6674183
these nikes, for example. it's a 70s throwback shoe, £62

>> No.6674197
File: 18 KB, 453x634, 1373472118-29882500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674197

>>6674196
whoops forgot pic

>> No.6674200

>>6674152
dude no

what's the nicest leather you've felt? do you actually have knowledge of leather or are you saying you THINK the leather felt nice?

>> No.6674228
File: 329 KB, 703x504, Picture 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674228

Royal dunks
(not to be confused with the Royal 1 our friends at HB are going crazy over)

>> No.6674236

>>6673595

Under Armor.

>> No.6674266

>>6674197
too expensive for me :( i can't save up either as I desperately need a pair

>> No.6674269
File: 37 KB, 317x475, OL-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674269

1/3

>> No.6674264

>>6674228
dear god no

>> No.6674273
File: 38 KB, 317x475, OL-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674273

>>6674269
2/3

>> No.6674278

>>6674269
>>6674273
>>6674277
dnc.

>> No.6674283

>>6674269
>>6674273
>>6674277

i don't like the fit

you can prolly size down though

>> No.6674277
File: 40 KB, 317x475, OL-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674277

>>6674273
3/3

>> No.6674285

>>6674266
ok well some of the adidas are under 50

>> No.6674300

>>6674283

it's an ma1 m8. it's supposed to be big.

>> No.6674304

>>6674278
>>6674278

care to elaborate?

>> No.6674309

>>6674304
Terrible fit. Second picture is a total gimmick. How much is it, anyway?

>> No.6674349

>>6674309
Yeah, the fit looks a bit off, but many OL pieces tend to look way better when I try them on compared to product shots. Probably going to try it out at their stor.

Around 400

>> No.6674356
File: 92 KB, 570x377, 38972.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674356

I just need confortable sneakers that don't look terrible with jeans or chinos.

>> No.6674363

>>6674356
New Balance

>> No.6674370

>>6674363
no he said he DOESN'T want them to look terrible.

>> No.6674406

>>6674264

Thanks, gonna cop.

>> No.6674407

>>6674356

cp, margiela

>> No.6674436

hey guys I got my order of clothing from cotton on and I'd say most of it is fine. Sure its pretty cheap and doesn't feel like expensive clothing but for the bargain was great. Just 2 tees out of the large bulk were terrible in /fa/ standards of quality. When shopping topman or cotton on just be careful

>> No.6674450 [DELETED] 
File: 49 KB, 1019x1384, 97S40FRED_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674450

>> No.6674457
File: 49 KB, 1019x1384, 97S40FRED_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6674457

$20, should I cop?

>> No.6674468

>>6674457
if you got the outfit to go with it

>> No.6674498

>>6674457
dude these would look terrible even if they didn't look like they have been horizontally stretched for people with feet shaped like flattened pencils

dnc

>> No.6674524

>>6673681
where do i find boots like these?

>> No.6675074

>>6674200
Settle the fuck down bud. If it feels nice then it feels nice. I don't need any sort of leather knowledge to know that. Anyways, my point was they don't seem to be cheaply made.

>> No.6675116

>>6674457
holy shit no

please take some time before making a purchase and just do some research, look at stores on the web, look at shoes you see out and about, look at fits on websites like tumblr, etc. because you clearly have no clue what you're doing.

those are so fucking ugly dude

>>6675074
>I don't need any sort of leather knowledge
You do, actually. You need to know what you're comparing it to, and you need to know how the leather is going to age and how it's going to look to people who know leather.

Partially because those people will be judging you, and partially because if you get into shoes any deeper you'll become one of those people and your opinion of the shoe will change.

You should never make an uninformed purchase. If anyone should "settle down", it's you: calm down and rethink the purchase before you rush into an ugly pair of boots that you'll regret.

>> No.6675120

>>6674524
if youre serious theyre clarks desert boots, you can find them anywhere

>> No.6675132
File: 131 KB, 440x440, 27171_550_2_1024x1024..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675132

?!

>> No.6675179
File: 8 KB, 325x365, 058672sz03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675179

adidas nizza black on black

>> No.6675210

>>6674196
>>6674197
w2c?

>> No.6675219

>>6675210
doesn't matter, found them

>> No.6675241

>>6675116
I honestly couldn't care less about the people judging me. If I like what I'm wearing, fuck their opinion. Also, even if I don't like them by next year, $70 is nothing.

>> No.6675246

>>6675241

>fuck their opinion

then dont post in a cop or not thread. the whole point of these is to get other people's opinions.

>> No.6675260

>>6675246
I was more wondering if it was worth the price or if I could get something better/comparable for around the same price. Hence why I put the price.

>> No.6675266

>>6675260
that's still a matter of opinion

>> No.6675263

>>6675246
>tru

>> No.6675268
File: 84 KB, 1599x1066, 1369551250732.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675268

>>6674127
idk i kind of like these

wouldnt cop those polo ones tho

>> No.6675298

>>6675266
Not if someone were to recommend something similar that is objectively of better quality than the boots I posted. That would certainly make the boots I posted a bad deal, would it not?

>> No.6675313

>>6675298

regardless its kind of lame to throw a tantrum when someone tells you not to buy something in a cop or not thread

carry on

>> No.6675327

>>6675313
I must have missed the part where I threw a tantrum

>> No.6675341

>>6675327

ok

>> No.6675342

>>6675327
>If I like what I'm wearing, fuck their opinion.

its cool tho i've sperged out MUCH harder on effay b4

>> No.6675348
File: 336 KB, 896x705, presentation_1_1358336213.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675348

Are Onitsukas good for casual wear? Looking at buying these Ultimate 81's

>> No.6675350

>>6675179
Where to cop?

>> No.6675358

>>6675348
yes. would cop if the red was white

>> No.6675367
File: 46 KB, 451x394, junglefrogs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675367

>> No.6675362

>>6673514

I got those pants and you might need to pinroll the bottom yourself to achieve a decent look. They're quite cheap though so don't expect them to last more than a few months.

>> No.6675376

>>6675342
Still not seeing the tantrum. Is it because I said fuck? Is this board full tightasses?

>> No.6675384
File: 18 KB, 500x236, large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675384

>>6675358
Yeah, I don't like the red either.

How about the Mexico 66?

>> No.6675392

>>6675376
shhhhh

its ok honey

>> No.6675404

>>6675392
Do you actually believe that I'm upset?

>> No.6675413

>>6675367
No

>> No.6675407

>>6675404
shhhhhhhhhhhh

>> No.6675419

>>6675384
awwwh yeah, saved.
thanx man

>> No.6675427

>>6675384
Yes

>> No.6675431

>>6675419
No prob.

I'll probably be going with this too

>> No.6675438
File: 62 KB, 509x639, IMG_4001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675438

Been looking for a black fishtail and I found this 2010 NSW one. The only problem is that it's a women's. The large's chest measurements work for me, but I'm worried that it'd look funky since it's womens.

Also worth noting that i'm 6' tall. Would it most likely be too short in a large?

Cop or Not?

>> No.6675456

>>6673681
You posted in the last thread, dnc this shit

>> No.6675466

>>6675407
Ok then. Good talk.

>> No.6675485
File: 152 KB, 485x430, geobaskets are for homos.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675485

cop?

>> No.6675494 [DELETED] 
File: 54 KB, 600x900, MG_9829_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675494

should i

>> No.6675522

>>6675485
Please do, they are sick, dope and awsm.

>> No.6675521

>>6675116
>implying I have any idea how to do that

>> No.6675533

>>6675494
What are they? And yes, id buy them.

>> No.6675544

>>6675494

I love the shaft and the sole, but not totally sold on the extended tongue. Any more shots or shots of them worn?

>> No.6675574

What do you guys think of Palladium? Do you think they can be worn casually?

>> No.6675583 [DELETED] 
File: 43 KB, 600x900, MG_9828_1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675583

>>6675533
>>6675544

cinzia araia

i feel like they are basically rick rip offs

they look gorgeous tho but for retail price i could probably just get rick or something 2nd hand if i was patient and could into rakuten


tfw desperate boot copping mode

>> No.6675590

>>6675583

I know what you mean by the Rick-ish vibe, but I think they're genuinely different enough (a little more rugged, less "architectural" than Rick boots) that it makes it stand on its own to a discerning eye. I've never handled CA stuff myself, so I can't help you on that, but if you genuinely like it, I can see it being a very versatile boot.

>> No.6675606

>>6675544
>shoes
you may not like it but just crossed it and thought maybe
http://global.rakuten.com/en/store/blowz/item/2025346/

>> No.6675633
File: 35 KB, 737x645, brokenimage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675633

cop or not?

>> No.6675644

>>6675633
>ironic shirts
nah

>> No.6675640

>>6675633
how much does it cost

>> No.6675654

>>6674356

Yes, cop. Ignore the faggot that said New Balance; Sambas are great and last for-fucking-ever.

>> No.6675660
File: 21 KB, 418x418, 67722_GY6104_m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675660

Cop these broken in chino shorts?

They're on sale for a little while longer

>> No.6675675

>>6675590

ok cool ty for the input
i have until payday to decide whether or not ill pull the trigger B)

>> No.6675691
File: 64 KB, 640x410, 324205599_a3b92bf803_z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675691

cop?

>> No.6675692
File: 84 KB, 492x820, 1376021028244.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675692

>>6675691

>> No.6675750

>>6675660
bump

>> No.6675752

>>6675691
i'd love to see someone pull this off without looking like a beta nerd

but you probably can't, so i would advise not to cop

>> No.6675781
File: 485 KB, 1360x1167, datsize.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675781

Cop either?

>> No.6675784

>>6675781
no

>> No.6675789

>>6675660
Anyone? The sale ends in a couple of hours.

>> No.6675817

>>6675789
>>6675660
They look okay, but nothing to get too excited about. Considering the price of similar shorts at J Crew/banana republic/wherever, they would be a good deal if <$40.

>> No.6675824

>>6675817
Well they are 30% off right now, so they're at $40.

>> No.6675874
File: 161 KB, 900x1200, 12072163_Black_001_ProductLarge[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675874

I'll remove the buttons on the shoulder. What the fuck are they for?

>> No.6675883

>>6675874
why not just buy a sweater w/o shoulder buttons instead

>> No.6675893

>>6675883
Because the quality and texture of this one is nice. Cutting a few strings only takes a minute...

>> No.6675919
File: 92 KB, 900x1200, 12062169_LEATHERBROWN_001_ProductLarge[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675919

>> No.6675926

>>6675919
w2c?

>> No.6675933

>>6675926
Jack & Jones

>> No.6675936
File: 11 KB, 300x250, Canteloupe Raisin Eggplant Apple Melon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6675936

>>6675926
>>6675919
jack and jones
I wouldn't its prob. low quality

>> No.6675941

>>6675936
how do u draw so fast

>> No.6675942

>>6675936
Haven't had any problems with quality with clothes from J&J before. Boot suggestions plos

>> No.6675943

>>6675874
w2c? the texture looks really nice

>> No.6675945

>>6675936
unless they have some nicer line i'm unaware of
I think core was just normal

>> No.6675952

>>6675941
i had this one already

>>6675942
red wing is veeery similar looking

>> No.6675959

>>6675942
I copped some skinny jeans from J&J before and they lost tightness and got knee pockets after about a week or two. Haven't washed them yet so they might be better once I do

>> No.6675965

>>6675959
If that happens I can just go get my money back.

>> No.6675967

>>6675952
Which one?

>> No.6675990

>>6675967
http://www.redwingheritage.com/boots/#&m=/detail/8196-heritage-us/8196-red-wing-heritage-mens-round-toe-boot-briar/

http://www.redwingheritage.com/boots/#&m=/detail/9111-heritage-us/9111-red-wing-heritage-mens-round-toe-boot-copper/

>> No.6676014
File: 140 KB, 707x900, 0-J20_red01.jpg-zoom_1361188012.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676014

Prob copping tommorow for pretty cheap

>> No.6676024

>>6675990
Tyvm
I don't like the color as much, though. Living in Norway I suspect they'll cost almost twice as much as the J&J ones too. We'll see...

Sorry to go off topic, but does anyone know where I can buy some nice vintage, "earthy" looking jumpers? You know, the wooly kind that old people wear. I've been to the thrift shops nearby and found nothing.

>> No.6676046

I didn't wanna make my own thread for this but I'm looking for a short sleeve button up shirt, preferably floral?

Anyone have any good suggestions?

>> No.6676050

>>6675874
>>6675893
>>6675943
PLEASE i really want to cop and reverse image search isn't working

>> No.6676064

>>6676050
It's from Jack and Jones, I'm looking at the Norwegian web store so I don't know if you'll find it elsewhere. Google "Dan o-neck".

>> No.6676082

>>6676014
Where are you buying it at?

>> No.6676094
File: 5 KB, 75x75, OYZ8HSD3A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676094

Can't tell whether I should cop these

>> No.6676095

>>6676082
Off a friend who wore it once for an hour only to find it was too big for him. I'm copping for a hunna, retail was 160+

>> No.6676101

>>6676095
Jelly. Cop.

>> No.6676104

>>6676064
found it, thanks

i'll definitely cut the lame buttons off though

>> No.6676105

>>6676094

>posting thumbnails

Neither can we, man.

>> No.6676113

>>6676094
it would help if we could see it properly, but it kinda looks like those cheap-as-chips plimsolls you get

>> No.6676116

>>6675132

yo you're probably not in the thread now but I wouldn't cop the kanken unless you've seen it in person. it's very small and the circular logo on the front is a bit sparkly/shiny. those two factors make it pretty feminine. I copped and wore for a bit but switched back to my plain black (de-branded) jansport.

>> No.6676119

>>6676101
Thx I posted it yesterday and no one liked :( I love the colors and I've been eying it for a while.

>> No.6676122
File: 145 KB, 1080x1080, 3ff18635c3d08ab197df7244b18f65a0_zoom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676122

>>6676105
Sorry, it's fixed

>> No.6676126
File: 15 KB, 295x450, H710HSGZOOM1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676126

>> No.6676137

>>6675936
I'm going to print this drawing out and frame it.

>> No.6676144

>>6676122

Looks pretty good, mang. Would cop.

>> No.6676145

>>6676122
personally i like these but a lot of people on /fa/ hate flimsy looking shoes, also they won't stand out very well but they'd be good for a minimalistic monochrome fit

>> No.6676140

>>6676126
noooooo
ewww

>> No.6676141

>>6675367
Are you the same twelve year old that posted the dinosaur shirt?

>> No.6676152

>>6676122
These remind of Janoskis.

>> No.6676232
File: 261 KB, 390x477, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676232

$55 from Woolrich, c/n

>> No.6676320

>>6676126
wow

>> No.6676321
File: 372 KB, 3000x1641, aaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676321

black or white

found the whites brand new for $150 more than the blacks

>> No.6676352

>>6676321
white shoes always my nigga

>> No.6676358

>>6676352
oh i didnt read the whole thing. shieeeeeet.

>> No.6676359

>>6676321
personally white, but pick whatever you think will go best with your fits

>> No.6676378
File: 204 KB, 1170x775, cop or not.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676378

Okay, guys, I just finished my shopping bag. It's supposed to be one outfit. Tell me what you think. But don't be r00d pls, first day on /fa/, never really cared about clothes before.

Anything that doesn't go with the rest etc? I originally wanted an autumny look, but found that very difficult. Couldn't find any t-shirts with the exact faint tint of brown that I wanted. Maybe the boots are too brown for the rest? Should I use a navy sweatshirt underneath the parka, or maybe just a t-shirt?

>> No.6676391
File: 13 KB, 400x400, creepycrawlers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676391

>>6676321
blackkkk

>> No.6676392
File: 58 KB, 612x612, 1371504215890.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676392

>>6676352
>>6676359
i'm only really considering the blacks because of this pic

will probably cop the whites though, did they fit tts?

>> No.6676408

>>6676392
They run .5-1 large.

Great find man, i have a pair of low whites myself

>> No.6676407

>>6676232
I would definitely cop since I like those kind of shirts and I like the color but it's a bit expensive for my standards

>> No.6676415

>>6676378
Tee on the left, grey or black hoodie, dark blue wash jeans. everything else is good. Great job!

>> No.6676436

>>6676392
Man I'm in the same dilemma as you, except I can't find whites anywhere.

>> No.6676437

>>6676408
ah damn the pair i found was my exact size, will probably cop still

>> No.6676438
File: 67 KB, 806x455, boot cop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676438

Entry level pleb here, which is better?
or if there is a better boot pls tell

>> No.6676452

>>6676438
both look awful to me

>> No.6676445

>>6676437
Don't get at least a half size down.

>> No.6676446

>>6676437
Just put a pair of insoles in them and you should fine

>> No.6676454

>>6676445
should be a comma after that "Don't"

>> No.6676464

>>6676407
k thanks bro

>> No.6676455

>>6676378
I mean i don't think anyone is gonna be rude. You got a lot of basics there, many of which /fa/ agree on. all those pieces are adaptable&&the only critique you'll get from me is it's a little safe/basic, but that comes from diff tastes.

>> No.6676460

http://www.oliverpeoples.com/online-boutique/op-sunglasses/mens/jannsson-sun.html

>> No.6676484

>>6676452
shit
can you point me towards better looking boots?

>> No.6676494

>>6676454
if only it was so easy to find them in the condition this pair is in
>>6676446
i may just do something along these lines


the site has a good return policy so if they look like clown shoes i'll just return them and go for the blacks

>> No.6676495

>>6676464
np man, I'm gonna check that site some more it's got me interested

>> No.6676500

>>6676484
clarks desert are the go to.

>> No.6676502

>>6676455
Yes, was advised by some other guy to start out simple so it's nearly impossible to fuck up. But /fa/ is a rude place according to what I've seen.

>>6676415
I don't think I can wear non-black jeans. Going to look for a quality hoodie that's grey and grainy, thanks for feedback.

>> No.6676504

>>6676494
Where are you getting them from?

>> No.6676519
File: 41 KB, 600x600, th-revere-lx-1_grande.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676519

>> No.6676524

>>6676116
is it possible to remove the logo on it?

>> No.6676525

>>6676519
420 blaze it bro

>> No.6676534

>>6676502
Anytime! Can I ask the reason why you can't wear no black jeans? Work or something?

>> No.6676530

>>6676504
i found them on a consignment site, they're listed as brand new in original box

>> No.6676540

>>6676495
has some decent stuff, lots of cosy wool shirts for winter

>> No.6676547
File: 776 KB, 1280x853, 1376048835470.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676547

>>6676502
*same guy that gave outfit advice* Lots of people on /fa/ are insecure assholes just ignore them and don't let it get to you, because if you look better than the plebs then who cares what some stranger on the internet thinks.

>> No.6676550

>>6676540
perfect

>> No.6676548
File: 39 KB, 480x360, 2305273-p-MULTIVIEW.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676548

>>6674147
just kopt

>> No.6676555

>>6676547
>ignore them and don't let it get to you,
That's a shit attitude to have. How are you going to improve if you don't actually listen to criticisms.

>> No.6676575

>>6676555
The assholes that hate every fit, not the helpful people with positive insightful criticism.

>> No.6676586
File: 2.07 MB, 3533x2455, kank.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676586

>>6676524

yeah it's just stitched on, but I bet there would be semi-noticeable holes left behind. but that could be cool I guess. just took a pick so you can see and see the sparkles.

>> No.6676589

>>6676575
That's still bullshit because the line you draw is arbitrary.

>> No.6676603

>>6676589
Okay, sorry about that. Newfriend, fuck every fit you post you'll never affoard geobaskets, fag.

>> No.6676613

>>6676586
Alright thanks man. I think I'll get the bigger size and just remove the logo

>> No.6676614

>>6676534
No, it just doesn't feel right to me, lol. Unless they're very dark.

>>6676547
Luckily my feelings aren't easily hurt, and I agree, but will definitely absorb good advice and constructive criticism any time. Fashion is so subjective that someone will always hate it, I guess. Feeling good about my own outfit is more important to me than it looking good to others, but a combination of both is the best.

>> No.6676645

>>6676614
I understand, I always feel like I'm overly nice just because I'm super sensitive and don't want to hurt someones feelings.
As for the black jeans, I really think a dark wash would look nice but if you aren't comfortable I'm sure the black will look great!

>> No.6676657

>>6676586
those bags look so cheap, ugly and childish

>> No.6676685

Anyone know about the sizing?

>> No.6676690
File: 28 KB, 671x500, 8881379740_1b1535aa83_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676690

>>6676685

>> No.6676692
File: 16 KB, 357x413, ironrangerboot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676692

>>6673432
debating biting the bullet and buying these for 250..
red wing iron ranger 8111

>> No.6676701

>>6676690
DNC

>> No.6676716

>>6676692
lel just go on revolveclothing and buy wolverines for the same price

>> No.6676719

>>6676690
Anyone know what this lace is called/how to lace like that?

>> No.6676733

>>6675179
i've been looking all over where to cop

>> No.6676750

>>6676716
newbie here. what are wolverines like? i've heard of wolverine 1ks but what is the difference that makes those better..?

>> No.6676761

>>6676719
http://fieggen.com/shoelace/sawtoothlacing.htm

If this isn't it, have fun looking through 37 other methods.

>> No.6676757

>>6675485
heat

>> No.6676769

>>6676014
go for it

>> No.6676776

>>6676750
It's preference between the 1ks and IRs. I personally find the 1ks more versatile and better looking, but I do prefer the cork sole of the IRs more. 1ks use Horween Chromexcel so the leather ages much more nicely imo.

>> No.6676798 [DELETED] 
File: 10 KB, 464x464, raflows.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676798

C/n?
Also where the hell can I get them

>> No.6676811

>>6676798
lel no

i dunno look around, raf simons has a website.

>> No.6676876
File: 132 KB, 953x610, fookingprawns.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6676876

Leaning towards not buying any

>> No.6676890

>>6676798
I have the whites and I love them. Look around the sufu/style forums. They pop up often

>> No.6676904

>>6676876
dnc

>> No.6676913

>>6676798

isn't it kind of embarrassing that you're a tripfag on a fashion board asking if you should cop raf sneakers? and furthermore asking where to obtain them?

>> No.6676947

>>6676876
dat sleek silhouette, blue is best

>> No.6676951

>>6676947
dat logo ruining dat silhouette

>> No.6676970

>>6676913
not at all.

>> No.6677062

>>6675752
i can pull it off. but I don't actually know where to cop...

>> No.6677078

>>6677062
make your own

>> No.6677195

>>6676701
Oh? How come?

>> No.6677225

brand is FORTY PERCENTS AGAINST RIGHTS

www.fparmg.com/?pid=60232545

>> No.6677234
File: 33 KB, 499x705, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6677234

>>6677225
oops forgot image

>> No.6677460
File: 13 KB, 325x365, 058133sz03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6677460

>>6673432
65 pounds?

>> No.6677468

>>6677460
seems kinda heavy for running sneakers. how will you even lift your feet?

>> No.6677573
File: 80 KB, 1340x1340, cl55436-nylnprmpck-blck-access-web.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6677573

I want a flat backpack that can hold two 1.5" binders, two small notebooks, and a laptop.

>> No.6677608

>>6675367
Holy shit is that the picture that was on my 6th grade science book? Def cop

>> No.6677635
File: 19 KB, 498x340, june_4_2013-1360[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6677635

cop or not
from oaknyc

>> No.6677644
File: 630 KB, 1280x853, air-jordan-1-retro-high-og-black-soft-grey-shadow-4-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6677644

for 200

>> No.6677668
File: 116 KB, 580x317, paul-and-shark-dsquared-2013-leather-belt-psb-07-dd09[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6677668

>> No.6677669

>>6673998
Get some airforce1s instead

>> No.6677696

>>6677669
Not him, but AF1s seem pretty chunky in comparison imo

>> No.6677728

>>6677696
AF1s are cuban drug lord-tier

>> No.6677730

>>6677635
i dont like it

>> No.6677731

>>6677668
unbelievably hideous

>> No.6677735

>>6676122
Just get a pair of janoskis. They're made better and they last longer. They also look better.

>> No.6677753

>>6677696
>>6677728
>implying being a chunky cuban druglord is bad

CAN U FUKKIN NOT???

>> No.6677848
File: 95 KB, 640x640, qasa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6677848

already bought em. curious as to how /fa/ feels about these though

>> No.6677857

>>6677730
And I respect your opinion

>> No.6677867
File: 609 KB, 1024x683, 1371359890642.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6677867

>>6677848
They go crazy over Roshes, so these having the same look and being more expensive they surely will cream themselves

>> No.6677869

>>6677848
i like them a lot. that said they look hard to pull off.
post a fit when you get them

>> No.6677885

>>6676321
>buying fakes

>> No.6677887

>>6677867
>>6677848
jk bruv i'm feeling those, nice cop

>> No.6677894

Where are the QASA fits, or are they pre orders.

>> No.6677920

>>6677869
will post a fit when they come in. apparently they're starting to hit some y-3 stores, I had someone come through with a pair for me and I've been wanting em since I saw that preview vid..

>> No.6677958
File: 88 KB, 392x1024, 608915726_o[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6677958

http://www.ebay.com/itm/LEVIS-501-SPECIAL-LIMITED-EDITION-24-CARAT-GOLD-LEAFED-JEANS-SIZE-W-32-L-32-/111076788950?pt=UK_Men_s_Jeans&hash=item19dcb14ad6

>> No.6677983

>>6677958
no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no

Please don't

>> No.6678012
File: 19 KB, 400x400, thumb.aspx.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6678012

First time browsing /fa/

I tried searching on the wiki as to what Cop or Not is. What happens if people say Cop? Does that mean get it?

Been thinking about getting this pleather jacket but I'm not too sure. I'd like a new jacket that I can actually wear and I kind of like my leather one that I currently have but the sleeves are too long.

I'm really REALLY picky about my jackets and it's actually rare that I find one that I like. Sorry for being a newfag guys.

$130.

>> No.6678021

>>6677958
HAHAHAHAHA OH MY GOD WHAT

>> No.6678030

>>6678012
yea it's just "buy or not?"

>> No.6678039

>>6678012

i like it. where 2 cop?

>> No.6678034

>>6678030
Okay. Thought so. Thanks the help!

>> No.6678048

>>6677848
where did you cop and how much did you pay?

>> No.6678055

>>6678039
http://ca.billabong.com/shop/product/mens-jackets/future-jacket?color=BLK

You could find it at a Billabong store i'm sure or perhaps a Boathouse. Or online. It's actually a lot nicer in person. Tried one on about 4 days ago at the mall but didn't have the money to buy it sadly but I plan on going back sometime this week to grab one.

>> No.6678062

>>6677958
I dont even...

>> No.6678067

>>6678048

y-3 employee sellin em under the table. $45 under retail shipped to me.

>> No.6678417

>>6674088

hahaha jesus what do those look like on a human

>> No.6678427

>>6677573

lol its a goth duck

>> No.6678539
File: 74 KB, 682x1024, Coordinate 002 D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6678539

>>6678417
this

>> No.6678806

oh my goodness
this beat is so hard

>> No.6678814
File: 821 KB, 1000x1200, 1000046038_010_Zoom_1-Front-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6678814

>> No.6679114

>>6674228
If you're gonna get Royals, get the 1's. The dunks look like dog shit.

>> No.6679174
File: 111 KB, 711x850, IMG_20130812_090755.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6679174

M65, but I feel there's a bit too much going on with the seams.

C? N?

>> No.6679261

>>6679174
I'd love that if the zipper were on the inside and there was no shoulder crap, and if there were no bottom pockets. but cop it if you like it a lot.

>> No.6679277

>>6679174
any more like this?

>> No.6679321

>>6679174
I like that color, w2c?

>> No.6679351

>>6679174
as pleb as you can get, dnc

>> No.6679375

>>6679277

There was a green one, but the S and M sizes are sold out.

>>6679321

http://us.asos.com/Brave-Soul-Jacket/zym0t/?iid=2938248&mporgp=L0JyYXZlLVNvdWwvQnJhdmUtU291bC1KYWNrZXQvUHJvZC8.&WT.ac=rec_viewed

>>6679351

The seed of doubt has been planted. Copped it.

>> No.6679419

>>6679375
he probably think it's pleb because of the abundance of things hanging off of it. here on /fa/ it's generally filled with minimalists

>> No.6681419
File: 107 KB, 1273x922, mto1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6681419

>>6677958
Oh god my eyes