Hightops

[Anonymous No.6462879]

w2c /fa/ hightops for 110ish?

Pic related, thinking about copping these

[Anonymous No.6462909]

How many times a day can we have this thread?
All white AF1 highs.

[Anonymous No.6462907]

I like those, I have them myself...I just hate the heart so I'm trying to figure out how to get it off or cover it.

[Anonymous No.6462926]

>>6462907
>hates heart
>spends 2x as much for basic converse with heart
your post makes no sense, you realize that right

[Anonymous No.6462933]

is the heart really the only difference between the cdgxconverse and just regular black chucks?

[Anonymous No.6462939]

>>6462926
no, regular black converse have white stitching and the black lines on the bottom. plus an ugly logo on the inside.

[Anonymous No.6462940]

>>6462933
>no contrast stitching
>original converse double layer canvas
>minimalist sole (no contrasting stripe and minimal detailing in the rubber)

i have a pair and i like them quite a lot

[Anonymous No.6462945]

Sk8-hi's

[Anonymous No.6462952]

>>6462940
>>6462939
i like the cleaner look of the cdg ones more, are these the only converse that look like this? besides rick owens ramones obvs

[Anonymous No.6462949]

>>6462939
fyi the cdg converse do have that thing on the inside but its like embroidered in and its black on black on black so it's like never noticeable but if you hold it close you can see it.

[Anonymous No.6462955]

>>6462933
the sole looks better and it doesn't have contrast stitching

higher quality

the downside is the logo

[Anonymous No.6462969]

>>6462949
yes I own them and that logo is hidden very well

>>6462955
Yeah I agree with this. Can anyone suggest ways of covering or removing the logo? or I will just google search....

[Anonymous No.6462983]

>>6462969

if you own them then you'd know its actually rather easy to scratch off the logo.. mine have started to peel after about 2 months of regular wear.

granted i actually like the logo

[Anonymous No.6462984]

>>6462907
>not liking the heart
Anyways if you must remove it; leave it soaking in paint thinner overnight and it peels right off.

[Anonymous No.6462985]

Is there anyplace i can get them based in the U.S? I don't really wanna pay a lot of shipping. Also, i'm a size 10 and i have no idea how UK sizing lines up with that, and if these are TTS anyway.

[Anonymous No.6462996]

>>6462985
http://shop.doverstreetmarket.com/size-guide/index/index/product/4683/

Ordered UK 8 Expecting US 9 , but it was US 8
Chucks have weird sizing

[Anonymous No.6462991]

peter schmidd

[Anonymous No.6462997]

>>6462996
chucks have equivalent UK and US sizing and they +1 for women

[Anonymous No.6463001]

>>6462984
>>6462983
Thanks a lot....I found the heart hard to peel off. and I will look up the paint thinner technique thanks so much
=]

[Anonymous No.6463016]

>>6463001
Just don't let it soak where the sole comes in contact with canvas, so try to just get the logo dipped in the Paint Thinner because it has a strong smell.

[Anonymous No.6463029]

>>6463016
thanks, I will keep this in mind.

[Anonymous No.6463033]

>>6462996
So buy a UK 10, get a US 10?

[Anonymous No.6463040]

just copped

[Anonymous No.6463045]

>>6462991
>peter schmidd
w2c

[Anonymous No.6463058]

why do people buy those

[Anonymous No.6463074]

>>6462991
>tfw still no white ones stocked

[zero No.6463079]

>>6463040
nice, might cop too

[Anonymous No.6463221]

>>6463045
schmid.cc

[Anonymous No.6463295]

>>6463045

if you googled "peter schmid" it's the first result you fuccboi

yes i mad

[Anonymous No.6463403]

>>6463074
are those supposed to be watered down Raf Velcros

[Anonymous No.6463612]

get these and add white laces

[Anonymous No.6463642]

>>6463612
new white laces would stick out too much,

[Anonymous No.6463707]

>>6463612
disgusting

[Anonymous No.6463718]

>want a pair
>dont like the logo
>if i keep the logo people will assume they're ''girl'' shoes
>if i remove it people will think they're fake or walmart converse

[Anonymous No.6463726]

>>6463718
>people will think
Why do you care so much?

[Anonymous No.6463740]

I constantly consider copping a pair of the cdg's but I'd feel like such a buttlicker for spending that much money on a pair of chucks.

Considering it's easy enough to take off the gay logo, I might just pull the trigger soon. It's that or another pair of Visions.

[Anonymous No.6463759]

>>6463718
>caring what plebs think
They couldn't tell the difference between Dreamboxes and real Rick if they held them in their hands.

[Anonymous No.6463866]

What's the sizing for CDG Converse like? Size down one? I have a pair of Sambas in 11.5 that are tight as fuck. Those are the only sneakers that I have that other people on here might have. I'd say my average is around 12.

I wear basic bitch americana heritage type work wear(jeans, henley. flannel, chamois, boots, chore coat, duck canvas, earthy tones etc.) and was thinking a pair of black low chucks might fit in my wardrobe but I never wear black and my all white sambas are more versatile... I never thought I would be a position where chucks might not be a good choice.

[Anonymous No.6464133]

>>6463866
bump

[Anonymous No.6464161]

>>6463740
Those are literally ugly as shit.

God you have terrible tastes

[Anonymous No.6464163]

gothninja exists as a subculture only because it impresses losers that grew up watching video games and jerking off to children's anime. it looks cool and edgy to them. when gothninjas post a photo on the internet, they are in control over the lighting, composition, and content of this photo. they can emulate an aesthetic seen so many times growing up in comic books/video games/movies etc. for this reason, gothninja pictures look cool and edgy to the weak, pale geeks of the world when they come to sufu, or 4chan, or stylezeitgeist, or pinterest, or thefedoralounge. when you take them outside this frame of reference, and capture someone trying to posture as "gothninja" while walking down santa monica boulevard with a slice of pizza in their hand, it becomes very obvious how pathetic their charade is. they lose control of their aesthetic in the real world and it's sad to behold. so instead they avoid being seen eating pizza, and try to slink around in the shadows smoking cigarettes, sending their mom to buy groceries so as not to be seen with luncheon meats in their hand. they avoid going to the beach because they know it's impossible to perpetuate their carefully crafted image there. it's like a symphony of spaghetti, and it makes me cringe.

[Anonymous No.6464177]

>>6464163
>babbysfirstpasta

[Anonymous No.6464183]

>>6464163
k

[Anonymous No.6464181]

>>6464163
fag

[Anonymous No.6464219]

>>6464161
imo they look pretty good irl. The outside logo comes right off and you can't even tell it was there. And they're just black suede highs, not sure what can be so ugly as shit about them.

Plus they're decently made. The pair I have lasted me a long fucking time, and I took pretty poor care of them.

What would you suggest instead, in terms of black hi's?

[Anonymous No.6464303]

>>6463866
read the thread fucking retard mouth breather.

[Anonymous No.6464330]

>>6464219
I'm sorry man. Those are the furthest from fashionable you can get. They look like generic sneakers a 14 year old would wear.

I can't really recommend you much without you providing a budget.

There are plenty of sneakers out there though. If you're on a budget you can always start with some type of converse like the varvatos weapons or the cdg collab hightops.

There's always the nike/hypebeast shoe selection route around the $100-$200 range.

Once you hit $200+ you can start looking at some discounted designer shit on a budget.

[Anonymous No.6464338]

>>6464219
Your shoes and your jacket are what gives off the most character in your outfit. Everything else is just mostly to form a certain silhouette. The ones you posted previously are basically generic and invisible as they come.

Some people like invisible--but usually it's _good_ invisible, like common projects that are so invisible that they stand out. If that makes sense.

Invest in good shoes. Shoes and Jackets are where 75% of your clothing budget should go towards.

[Anonymous No.6464354]

>tfw you realize what you thought was black is actually navy

Still kinda want them, though, especially since they're cheap as fuck now. But god damn it I hate navy, but really only for that reason.

[Anonymous No.6464359]

>>6464354
i usually hate y3 but thats actually not that bad

[Anonymous No.6464377]

>>6464354
idk if it's just my screen, but those ones actually look pretty black. Did they ever make black ones?
Here's the pic from the site, pretty navy.

[Anonymous No.6464417]

>>6464330
Appreciate the tips, I'll consider those options.

>>6464338
Preaching to the choir on the shoes+jacket thing, I strongly agree. I copped the KW's on /fa/'s rec a while back, now I'm just in the process of replacing all my footwear I need to retire.

[Anonymous No.6464886]

>>6463040
>>6463079

What are these? google did not help

[basedprophet !IFJ/2SLAGo No.6464896]

>>6464417
kent wangs are literally shit though

[Anonymous No.6464910]

Vans sk8 hi in leather is a good shoe for that price range

[Anonymous No.6464913]

>>6462909
you mean the mids, right?

[Anonymous No.6466225]

>>6464910
agreed check deese in true white, gunna cop soon