/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.6456003]

reddit is stylin' on you

[Anonymous No.6456020]

Raf Simmons Murdera's

[Anonymous No.6456017]

topkek it's this guy

[zero No.6456015]

>not copping the terrex ones

[Anonymous No.6456019]

Those are horrible, nobody would've bought them if it wasn't for
>m-muh ricky owens

[Anonymous No.6456022]

Those are nice.

>>6456017
Are those shoes by Alex Wang or Vans?

[Anonymous No.6456026]

>>6456022

vans

[Anonymous No.6456028]

>>6456003
Cop them from UNDFTD?

[Anonymous No.6456029]

this shit is seriously hideous

[Anonymous No.6456042]

>>6456003
these shoes are actually awesome and i want them. anyone know w2c still or are they sold out everywhere?

[Anonymous No.6456048]

yeah they kinda are. I can understand why people think they're disgusting but I think it's a cool kind of disgusting.

link to thread?

[Anonymous No.6456049]

>>6456042
http://undefeated.com/footwear/low/adidas-x-raf-simons-ozweego-2

[Anonymous No.6456050]

>>6456048

rest of the thread is boring

http://www.reddit.com/r/malefashion/comments/1hr4nu/waywt_shoes/

[Σ▼ƦƟ/ƒ▲/Ğ No.6456053]

>>6456042
Sold out mate. Can be found on SUFU and Ebay though.

Those runners are on sale in white in a local store chain here. 180 euros. Mmm. tempting.

[Anonymous No.6456054]

i like those shoes but they look like those cheap sports shoes that all the autistic kids wore in school

[Anonymous No.6456065]

>Teh_Shadow_Knight 1 point 47 minutes ago
>I'm sorry solar, but those look bad. They look like $25 shoes that a very very old person would wear. What would these go with?

so mfa is exactly like fa except there's less useless shitposting because it gets el downboated?

[Anonymous No.6456069]

>>6456017
>tfw seeing someone from real life on /fa/

[Anonymous No.6456077]

>>6456069

is he a nice guy

[Anonymous No.6456082]

wow it's almost like people on mfa actually have nice things and don't just shit on them

what "nike's" are those 2nd from the camera and why don't they have the disgusting swoosh?

[Anonymous No.6456090]

wtf happened to mfa? It's like /fa/ without the douchebaggery now.

[Anonymous No.6456100]

>>6456090
>>6456065

that board is

>malefashion

not malefashionadvice

[Anonymous No.6456121]

>>6456090
idk it was never significantly worse than /fa/ in my opinion even when it was used as a buzzword around here. i do think their waywts are bettter

[Anonymous No.6456148]

>>6456100

that explains a lot

honestly mf looks like the shit judging by the front page, is mfa the /b/ of reddit or what

(I know there's a trillion subreddits)

[Anonymous No.6456143]

those are fucking disgusting jesus christ

i know you guys will call me some dadcore loving pleb but i do like a lot of raf's shit. Honestly though those shoes are exactly the kind of shit the special ed kids and middle aged dads who go hiking wear. Maybe this is just 2 deep 4 me but seriously i just can't comprehend why anyone here would like them other than "RAF SIMONS LEL"

if those were by new balance or some walmart tier brand for 10 year olds and somebody posted them here, /fa/ would totally fucking be pulling the autist, fedora - wearing insults.

[Anonymous No.6456150]

>>6456017
does he like techno?
dem niggas from finland

[Anonymous No.6456158]

these shits are so sick, would look amazing with some yohji pants and a loose black t

[Anonymous No.6456165]

>>6456143
agreed

[Anonymous No.6456161]

>>6456143
tl;dr
on the other hand
damn dose sneaks are beautiful nigga
dat kid is so nextlevel im not even joking!

[Anonymous No.6456180]

>>6456143

it's busy and colorful but I think there's definitely a coherent aesthetic to it

I don't really give a shit about the designer names and I think that the associations you bring up with "retard shoes" or whatever is what makes it interesting. like I said it's busy but for me it's aesthetically pleasing. look at the thumbnails for both (OP and the one you posted) and tell me that there's not a difference?

but I'm not really one to talk about sneaker appreciation because there's some shit I'll never understand. I even accept reebok alien stompers but these shits are beyond me.

[Anonymous No.6456195]

also it's got something to do with the way the materials reflect light because imo it looks a hell of a lot better in the op photo than it does in the stock photo

[Anonymous No.6456198]

>>6456053
are you talking about the new adidas or the ones in his pic bc I know a few sites that have them in stock

[twerk it No.6456191]

>>6456143
these are not salient design criticisms, this is you bleating about not liking things
approach it as a design object and critique it in that context. personal opinions and critical opinions are different things and no one cares about your personal opinion.

[Anonymous No.6456206]

>>6456082
i dont know if i like the og military gats or these adidas ones more...

[Anonymous No.6456210]

>>6456143
>but i do like a lot of raf's shit
you think that justifies your opinions? that's like saying that you listen to joy division, so all your opinions on my bloody valentine are worthwhile.
>if those were by new balance or some walmart tier brand for 10 year olds and somebody posted them here, /fa/ would totally fucking be pulling the autist, fedora - wearing insults
that's the whole point of those shoes. they are confusing. they take all the elements that would usually make up an ugly shoe for autists, and uses those elements to make something that looks good.

whatever though, these shoes are destined to be polarizing.

[Anonymous No.6456224]

>>6456206

w2c all white sambas like that?

I think mmm high tops are the prettiest shoes in the universe but I'm too much of a brokeboi to afford them

[Anonymous No.6456253]

>>6456224
got em for like $50 off amazon, theyre gone now

[Anonymous No.6456329]

I think we learned today that reddit much like the rest of the internet is a place of much diversity and breadth