[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 40 KB, 500x386, Lacoste.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6398189 No.6398189[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>INSIDER INFO

Did you know, it costs Lacoste £3.00 (roughly $4.60) to make a polo?

>> No.6398324

Bamp

True info.

>> No.6398347

and it costs me about $12 to buy one on eBay.

>> No.6398396

>>6398189
bullshit. proof nigga

>> No.6398401

Who the fuck is buying lacoste?

>> No.6398407

lol and?
what did you expect it to cost them?

>> No.6398475

Counting shipping?

>> No.6398514

lacoste is for poor people who want to feel like rich people

>> No.6398526

>>6398514
/thread

>> No.6398527

its about wearing a brand that you like you fucking bitch ass faggot. only poor people that wish they had more money complain about shit like this. i fucking hate people that argue that designer shit costs 3% what they retail for. its about wearing and supporting a brand you like. so stop complaining you poor bitch child fucking shit fuck. i never wanna hear someone talk about shit like this again or else im going to chop their poor knuckle dragged fingers off and wear them as a fucking reminder to all the other faggot shits out there

>> No.6398542

>>6398527
>Lacoste
>Designer
>like

>> No.6398575

>>6398542
>designer
>brand
pretty much almost the same thing friendo

>> No.6398594

>>6398527
Cool your damn jets m8, jesus.

>> No.6398599

>>6398575
so h&m is designer?

>> No.6398602

>>6398575
no

>> No.6398621

>>6398599
Designer is a buzzword to make pleb faggots pay more for shit.

>> No.6398622
File: 148 KB, 434x313, 1371890192471.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6398622

That is more than I thought. My guess would have been around $.78-$1.49

>> No.6398656

>>6398599
>>6398602
oh honey bunnies, h&m the brand sells h&m clothes. alexander wang the designer sells alexander wang clothes. everything is the same, but everything is different, you big bunch of bitch shits

>> No.6398667

>>6398621
no, youre just too poor to afford nice things, so you have to keep telling yourself theres no difference.

>> No.6398717

Cool but even the most profitable companies in the world make 20-30% profit max after overhead.

>> No.6398729

>what is a brand

>> No.6399144

I always struggle to find nice Lacoste things... Last time I went in their boutique I had a look at some of the shirts, they're not even bad shirts but I feel like the crocodile logo cheapens up outfits too much. Like if I'm wearing Jil Sander trousers and shit, I feel like the croc kinda makes it seem cheaper.

>> No.6399157

>>6399144
>shirt
>any branding visible
>no

>> No.6399181

>>6399157
Yeah I hear that, BUT, with casual shirts (ie preppy oxfords) I think it's more acceptable. Ralph Lauren puts out pretty good shirts, the slim fit is nice... I don't mind the pony. RRL is a bit better AND doesn't have the logo but I hear it's a workwear fit (AKA super-baggy) so that's a no-go unfortunately.

Why's it so goddamn hard to find a slim-fit white shirt with blue stripes.

>> No.6401095

I just spent $200 on two polos and pants at Lacoste. They fit well so I guess it's worth it.

>> No.6401165

>ralph lauren
>a self hating jew jerking off to a WASP ideal that was never his to begin with.
>last name is actually Lifshitz
>buying any day
>ever

ahahahahaha.

>> No.6401166

>>6401165
oh, i'm sorry

>>6401095
that was for you ~<3

>> No.6401173

so lacoste is a commercial designer brand right