[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 418 KB, 700x1255, holyshit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6369847 No.6369847 [Reply] [Original]

Today I looked at a few drop crotch pants and then...

sweet mother of god

Am I being a slowbro here or was this general knowledge???

>> No.6369851

for the most part, yes.

>> No.6369860

>>6369851
I almost bought a pair solely out of hype but now that I look closely I can almost bring myself to like it proper and honestly

>> No.6369867

reaaaly hit or miss with these. Try it out those and report back

>> No.6369868

What does this mean? Im new here, pleas explain

>> No.6369873
File: 206 KB, 666x639, img0205sp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6369873

the bottom of the fly of rick pods is close to a golden ratio from the wearer's shoulder. to the bottom of the drop is approximately a golden ratio from the head.

>> No.6369876

>>6369868
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio

Didn't you have art class

>> No.6369889

>>6369873
I just wonder if designers do this sort of thing consciously or because it well... looks good and comes naturally

>> No.6369890

>>6369876
Oh that has to do with the fib sequence right, I cheated most of my way but I watched Pi one time.

>> No.6369891
File: 1011 KB, 1536x2048, Thorsberg_Trousers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6369891

>>6369876
op's pic isn't a golden ratio, it's a rule of thirds.

>> No.6369894

>>6369891
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_thirds
What's the difference though

Color me interested

>> No.6369905
File: 300 KB, 1280x895, tumblr_md97umSFuY1qzy17fo3_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6369905

>>6369889
it's approximate, this stuff is too amorphous to nail because you don't have absolute control over the silhouette as you would if you painted the people instead of sold clothing to them. plus, plenty of great design follows neither rule. to me the most important thing is to have some long shapes. i dislike "normal" fits because the torso and legs are too balanced, it's too boring to look at. long torsos and short legs, long legs and short torsos, or just huge pillars of fabric where the body should be get me interested.

>>6369894
this does a good job at explaining the difference as it relates to photography
http://www.apnphotographyschool.com/composition/difference-between-rule-of-thirds-and-golden-ratio/

>> No.6369907

Drop crotch pans are fucking ugly, they make even 6'2 men look short, even more when worn with fucking high tops. Idiotic trend

>> No.6369911

>>6369894

There is none really.

>> No.6369918

>>6369905
Wow I learned something from /fa/ today

>> No.6369923

>>6369860
i like mine, theyre interesting for sure. after wearing them for a while, "normal" cut pants seemed weird to me

>> No.6369951
File: 460 KB, 2448x2873, chTCw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6369951

never got this
dont even get why people sag their jeans
why in the fuck would you want your legs to log short?
best example for super nice proportions i have saved even tho i heard uhhh is small

>> No.6369964

>>6369951
>nice proportions
yeah except for his clown feet

>> No.6370005

>>6369951
This is what I'm thinking, isn't it more aesthetically pleasing to see longer legs?

Maybe it's cause I'm a manlet, I think I would look like shit in drop crotch pants.

>> No.6370018
File: 139 KB, 2000x2000, just stop.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370018

>>6370005
>isn't it more aesthetically pleasing
in whose esteem?

>> No.6370023

golden ratio (or rectangle) is 1.614 longer than the length or width of a perfect square

yw
- Corbusier

>> No.6370022

>>6369951
that looks incredibly awkward imo

>> No.6370025

>>6369905
>>6370018
Pseudo-intellectualism.

>> No.6370029

>>6369951
this isn't uhh though

>> No.6370031
File: 12 KB, 480x359, 1353277075438.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370031

>>6370025
>Person types coherent sentences on 4chan
>pseudo-intellectualism.

>> No.6370038

>>6370005
No, a longer torso looks better than a shorter one. I have long legs and sag around mid hip level and it looks way better. Bitches love that V, if you're skinny as fuck your hips will show it automatically

>> No.6370041

>>6370031
You can tell he tries too hard.

>> No.6370046

>>6370038
>>6370018
All I mean is if you're already short doesn't it make you appear shorter?

>> No.6370047
File: 100 KB, 990x1191, AW12---RICK OWENS---RU9371 P009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370047

>>6370038
>2013
>not wearing high rise drop crotch
tbh tho this model is wearing it too low

>> No.6370052

>>6370041
I can tell that you care too much for no apparent reason

>> No.6370053
File: 85 KB, 900x1200, god i cant believe im saving this even to make a point.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370053

>>6370046
not at all
imagine the same proportions from a girl's dress, doesn't make her look shorter.

>> No.6370059
File: 28 KB, 409x224, othr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370059

>>6370041
lol, all of my posts are typed stream of consciousness in a few minutes. i don't proofread and you can tell because i make frequent typos :^)

>> No.6370058

>>6370053
m-maybe i will try drop crotch pants then

>> No.6370061

>>6370052
Stop sticking up for Twerk and let me bully him.

>> No.6370075

>>6370061
B-but lgbt bashing is so 2009

>> No.6370082

>drop crotch pants
why not just sag your jeans

>> No.6370084

>>6370082
>6370082
Your panties would break the line

>> No.6370085

>>6370053
That's not the same though is it? Maybe you'd have a point if the waistband on the dress was around her hips or something.

>> No.6370106
File: 31 KB, 320x480, 00100m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6370106

>>6370085
uh? the waistband of the pods is also at the waist