[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 440 KB, 800x600, tumblr_mmaoyfy9bU1qa2j8co2_r1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6308884 No.6308884 [Reply] [Original]

cps vs kw
discuss

>> No.6308917

Kw?

>> No.6308921

Cps good
Kw bad
/thread
Also lurk more op

>> No.6308922

>>6308884
cupsole vs glued sole

>> No.6308924
File: 55 KB, 294x516, 1370848945750.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6308924

>>6308917
kent wang

>> No.6308936
File: 435 KB, 800x600, tumblr_mmaoyfy9bU1qa2j8co3_r1_1280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6308936

they look so close though and at $95 you could buy so many for the price of cps

>> No.6308946

>>6308936
You can see that the material for the cps are obviously better from that picture though

But if you just wore Kent Wangs by themselves nobody would notice

>> No.6308952

>>6308884
these are both terrible! the brand name isnt even located anywhere on the surface of the shoe, which is a mark of a good quality shoe. if you want white sneakers i would suggest chuck taylors or supra. visible branding and they look very trendy!

>> No.6308953

>>6308936
You can look at these and tell one will last far longer than the other. Also just the stitching is done so much better on the CPs.

>> No.6308958

>>6308936
While the v2 of the Kent Wang shoes do look even more similar to the Common Project's to the point of blatantly copying the design, I still prefer the Common Projects' more sleek look and the construction. That and I always get a laugh when I read this on the Kent Wang site for the shoe description:
"In the 1960-70s, shoemakers used to make simple, minimal shoes like these. Today, they only make excessively sporty designs plastered with logos. Let's go back to a simpler time."

>> No.6308959

>>6308946
well at $400 i would hope so.
and at $95 they're very very close.

>> No.6308961

>>6308884
dislike toebox on the kent wangs.

CPs are just so much prettier in every way.

>> No.6308963

>>6308936
the toebox of the kw look shit. visible eyeholes looks terrible.

i think kent wangs are great for a 'beat up' pair if the weather is terrible and you dont want to damage your cps
>implying beat up cps dont look immaculate af
>being a poorfuck for even considering sub par white sneakers

>> No.6308966

>>6308959
Until the glue comes undone.

What do you want us to tell you OP? That the quality is unrivaled, the price unbeatable and the shoe flyest in all the land? They are cheap knockoffs, buy them if you cannot afford the real shit.