STICKY WIKI GENERAL #7

[Anonymous No.6263554]

Contact with the "moot" has been established edition

Previous Thread: >>6256892

Website: tuxbell.com

Suggestions: tuxbell.com/fa

REMEMBER: If you think it needs to be changed, edit it yourself :^)

[Anonymous No.6263558]

so how about that stores page?

[Anonymous No.6263559]

>>6263554
>Contact with the "moot" has been established edition
ooh what??
#nice

[Anonymous No.6263565]

>>6263559

using a hashag on 4chan

[N1CKL3B4KK No.6263566]

>>6263554

Put australian boutiques in the table and removed that section, sidebar beginner mistakes pls

[Anonymous No.6263568]

>PONPON is still playing on the suggestions page

This makes me happy.

[Anonymous No.6263563]

>>6263559
second, whats happened?

[Anonymous No.6263574]

Needs a page on vaginal care my snatch ##fuarking reeks

[Anonymous No.6263576]

>>6263574
but is vaginal care /fa/?

[Anonymous No.6263578]

What should we do about hair styles

[Anonymous No.6263579]

>>6263576
well is tunapussy /fa/? If so go down on the queen of fashion because mine is fucking rancid no joke idk what my problem is.

[Anonymous No.6263581]

I think this is a great idea

[Anonymous No.6263582]

>>6263579
2 much cok

[Anonymous No.6263580]

>>6263578
Baldchan only hair style

[Anonymous No.6263583]

>>6263582
only had sex once with a condom though

[Anonymous No.6263584]

>>6263581
Yeah this is good.

[Anonymous No.6263587]

>>6263583
>sex with a condom once
And all the other times you let them go in bareback?

[Anonymous No.6263593]

Yo guys for the different syles pages we should have a gallery of example. i feel the 'streetwear' pic doesnt really describe the style correctly.

[Anonymous No.6263595]

I've noticed a lot of people have been adding the city where the store can be found. Makes sense. What's the best way to include this?

[N1CKL3B4KK No.6263596]

>>6263593

I think thats going to be added, the style section is pretty bare at the moment

[Anonymous No.6263597]

>>6263587
No. Sex once.

[banana No.6263598]

>>6263595
description seems fine to me, since many of them are in shittons of cities, so another column would be redundant

[banana No.6263601]

>>6263559
>>6263563

i just sent him an well-written email sorry 2 hype u up

[Anonymous No.6263606]

>>6263581
too subjective

[Anonymous No.6263607]

Where is our glorious OP/admin

[Anonymous No.6263611]

>>6263581
I've done a lot of graphical design in the past. I'll put something together if /fa/ can come up with enough bullet points.

[N1CKL3B4KK No.6263739]

>>6263611

>Does it fit
>Can you afford it
>What does it work with
>Is it decent quality
>Will it stay in style
>???

[Anonymous No.6263766]

>>6263739
also
>are you buying it just because its on sale

[banana No.6263770]

>>6263766
fuck.
gutted ;_;

>>6263607
i dunno it would be very helpful if he showed up

[Anonymous No.6263772]

>>6263739
>What does it workwith/Do you have the warderobe to pull it off?

>>6263766
>too many times...

[Anonymous No.6263777]

>>6263770
2many wastes of money because of sales

>Its raf simons, its on sale it doesnt matter if its a bit different colour

green dip dye sweater nvr again

[N1CKL3B4KK No.6263781]

>>6263766

[Anonymous No.6263793]

This is my own personal opinion, but it would be so much more beneficial if the website was geared towards a lookbook style layout, than just paragraphs and paragraphs detailing styling options.

Also instead of just listing brands, I think it should incorporate more of a community input. Where people could showcase what they have brought and post it under the particular brand accordingly.

Also since fashion is constantly evolving, people need to be constantly updating new content to tuxbell, which I find is lacking. Who is going to take responsibility for adding new content? Anyone from the public or is someone/a group going to continuously monitor it?

Finally, as I read the content in tuxbell, it just seems like I am reading book about losing weight. You get what I mean? Its not enabling people to get more involved into fashion. Its like going to a museum and learning about fashion instead...

Sorry for the rant, I just think tuxbell needs to be more organized and have a clearer method of informing the audience with its content. Like what is the actual aim of tuxbell? Is it to just record fashion trends or is it there to inspire people with their choices?

>>6263739
>>Will it stay in style
>>???

That is a really good point.

Again apologies for the rant, I have just seen this website being given to so many people on /fa as a bible. When I just don't think its at the stage where it could aid people to make informed choices.

[banana No.6263801]

>>6263793
>Also instead of just listing brands, I think it should incorporate more of a community input. Where people could showcase what they have brought and post it under the particular brand accordingly.

that actually exists its the opinion pages hip$ster made

>
Also since fashion is constantly evolving, people need to be constantly updating new content to tuxbell, which I find is lacking. Who is going to take responsibility for adding new content? Anyone from the public or is someone/a group going to continuously monitor it?

this is a given pretty much

>
Finally, as I read the content in tuxbell, it just seems like I am reading book about losing weight. You get what I mean? Its not enabling people to get more involved into fashion. Its like going to a museum and learning about fashion instead...

wut

[Anonymous No.6263831]

>>6263801
>>
>Finally, as I read the content in tuxbell, it just seems like I am reading book about losing weight. You get what I mean? Its not enabling people to get more involved into fashion. Its like going to a museum and learning about fashion instead...
>wut

Sorry, it is just the way the whole thing is structured. I think people would benefit more, with more images.

>that actually exists its the opinion pages hip$ster made

Am I having difficulty to even locate that page. Can you give me the directory?

>this is a given pretty much
We can't just expected people to contribute.
The site should be at least stickied to /fa or something.

[Anonymous No.6263835]

>>6263801
>>
>Finally, as I read the content in tuxbell, it just seems like I am reading book about losing weight. You get what I mean? Its not enabling people to get more involved into fashion. Its like going to a museum and learning about fashion instead...
>wut

Sorry, it is just the way the whole thing is structured. I think people would benefit more, with more images.

>that actually exists its the opinion pages hip$ster made

I am having difficulty to even locate that page. Can you give me the directory?

>this is a given pretty much
We can't just expected people to contribute.
The site should be at least stickied to /fa or something.

[N1CKL3B4KK No.6263843]

>>6263793
>>6263835

The new sticky (Tuxbell) is meant to be a seperate entity with info about starting out, basic structure of a wardrobe, styles, trends, stores etc that supplements /fa/, so somebody relatively new to the board can get some advice without making a thread. Having a solid sticky leaves /fa/ free for discussion about fashion and not being clogged with "where are good stores?" or "how do i into streetwear?".

The old sticky isnt that good at stopping these, and since nobody can really update it its not relevant or helpful to a beginner. Tuxbell is fixing this.

idk but i think this is a pretty good way to do it, /fit/ has a good sticky for pretty much anyone new to the board.

[Anonymous No.6263844]

>>6263835

Are you retarted? we are making a new sticky, not a random fashion website

[Anonymous No.6263860]

>>6263843
Ahhhhhhhhhh I see now.

That actually clears up a lot of questions. But definitely though, I didn't intend to indicate that tuxbell was a wasted effort. I really do think its a good idea.

I just got quite confused with the amount of explicit information that was on there, stating not to wear this or not to wear that. I found that quite limiting in terms of the ability for the audience to choose or to support creativity.

Thank you for the reply though, it really did clear up a lot of things.

[Anonymous No.6263868]

>>6263844
>not a random fashion website
Yea sorry about that, I got confused about the purpose of that site.

[Anonymous No.6263870]

>>6263868

its ok friend

[Anonymous No.6263874]

Countries we have now:
Belgium
France
Germany
UK
Canada
US
Brazil
Australia
New-Zealand

Would be great if someone could add some more. If anything, add your country's Zara's and H&M's so we have something to start with. You can just copy paste those entries from other countries anyway.

[Anonymous No.6263877]

I love the person who took their time to draw this up
I can help with the Africa section soon if ure interested just reply pls
posting without trip ergh too tired this morning
#silentservant

[Anonymous No.6263882]

>>6263877
bruh do an africa section, would be really interesting.

I was born there and moved to france when i was 9. no idea about what fashion is like there

[Anonymous No.6263885]

>>6263877
>I can help with the Africa section soon if ure interested just reply pls
Please do. I thought that would be the most difficult one.

[Anonymous No.6263894]

Added the separate entry in Canada to the regular list.

[TroalPost !!M/8ntLE+we3 No.6263895]

>>6263882
in sa particularly it's interesting esp with the youth-dont travel to other african countries yet so idc/k about them-
unfortunately it'll be late late and wont be up until tuesday if possible
#silentservant - the trip is up

[Anonymous No.6263920]

Could you add Darklands (4.0) to Germany's store list? As it is actually in Germany, lel

[Anonymous No.6263924]

>>6263920
We need a shipping information table. Like if they ship worldwide or not or even have a online store or not.

[Anonymous No.6263928]

>>6263924

I mean it's currently listed in the US, which i found, odd.

[Anonymous No.6263929]

>>6263924

The country specific sections covers that, the extra shipping info would clutter it, seeing as some sites ship to some countries and not others

[Anonymous No.6263932]

>>6263924
Nahh, i think tho whole place is for online stores.

We cant just list literally every store in your town or something. that would make shit way too cluttered.

Also shipping is related to the countries their in

[Anonymous No.6263933]

>>6263924
We could have a separate section for Online stores that ship worldwide. Otherwise you'd have to put them in every country's list.

[Anonymous No.6263937]

>>6263933
thats possibly a decent idea, But what about a store that only ships to certain countries in Europe?

Or one that ships to only Canada and the us?

[Anonymous No.6263940]

A fashionable girl has to improve the womens sections, all that stuff about straight/flare jeans and 'curvy' girls is making me cringe

[Anonymous No.6263948]

Galleries with examples for the style section would be great.

For sections on designers themselves couldn't we just copy what Wikipedia has and adjust it accordingly?

[Anonymous No.6263954]

>>6263937
Well, you could make a different lay-out for online stores, where you can rank according to the regions they ship to.

I think the people looking for online shops will be other people than the ones looking for local shops anyway, so I believe they should be separated?

[Anonymous No.6263957]

>>6263948
>>6263948
>>6263948
This i can start gathering images for gothninja, streetwear and menswear but i dont know how to create a gallery

[Anonymous No.6263962]

>>6263954
Honesty i dont like that idea, if someone wants to find stores in their city they shouldn't consult the wiki, they should use google or go out and look.

The online/popular stores that ship to countries is miles better imo because the vast majority of the stores also have physical locations.

[Anonymous No.6263968]

>>6263957
You can create an image gallery with IMGUR.

Just drop the gallery link here and someone will add it to the wiki.

[Anonymous No.6263971]

>>6263962
Sorry, but I disagree. Listing only big chains is prett useless imo, as everyone knows those already.

A nice list of decent clothing stores in a city your visiting is way more useful.

[Anonymous No.6263974]

>>6263971
*translate this to non-hangover English

[Anonymous No.6263982]

>>6263971
>>6263954
Wait a sec, are you proposing we

LIST EVERY SINGLE STORE IN EVERY SINGLE CITY all on one page?

[Anonymous No.6263995]

>>6263982
No, I suggest we list /fa/ approved stores and the stores people who visit /fa/ might stumble upon.

[Anonymous No.6263999]

>>6263982
there should be separate links to a page for that under each city then, if you want to do it

[Anonymous No.6264004]

>>6263995
there should be separate links to a page for that under each city then, if you want to do it

[Anonymous No.6264010]

>>6264004
So you would propose something like this:

-Online stores
--Ship worldwide
--Ship to specific regions

-Physical stores
--Continent
---Country
-----Big chains
-----Cities
--------City 1
--------City 2

and so on?

[Anonymous No.6264016]

>>6264010
When you start splitting things up into cities you're just going to make things too messy.

[Anonymous No.6264017]

>>6263554
what happened to the tripfag page?

I just spent a good hour editing all the bullshit some newfag spweed on all of those pages

like using the word "avant-garde" to describe a style

and just completely wrong info

perry ellis sunglasses really?!?!

I put real info too I could have been a dick and put fake /misleading info

[tripskmobile No.6264025]

>>6264010
We could have city pages

eg: Toronto: full of fuccbois and asians, but if you have to live in Canada then it's one of your best bets.
Some good stores, some cheap stores, tailor recs, hairstylists, markets, where to buy consignment, etc

[Anonymous No.6264029]

>>6264025
Yeh that'd be a better way of doing it. Still have the stores page as it is though.

[Anonymous No.6264032]

>>6264010
No most online stores have physical stores too.

[Anonymous No.6264035]

>>6264032
Only a few though. Compared to shipping worldwide.

[Anonymous No.6264053]

I added a street wear gallery but its only 11 images, if anyone wants to send me some pic's or something it would help

http://imgur.com/a/GqeBK#0

[tripskmobile No.6264056]

>>6264032
The environment is totally different though. And usually well-curated boutiques are much better than their online counterparts because they move stock more quickly. It's not like we're going to tell them to go to Macy's or anything. The advice will be more like: "Here you can try on jeans, they hem them in store," "a sidewalk sale on the last Friday of each month!" and "Here you can try new CDG parfums and buy Saddleback bags."
Just tips for residents or visitors

[Anonymous No.6264086]

>>6264025
>>6264029

Why dont we have

Stores: Select country to be taken to page

Each country has the table that was previously in stores for them, and then combine with a synopsis of each major city etc.

[Anonymous No.6264091]

>>6264086
I like this.

[Anonymous No.6264096]

I want to add Israel to the list with a few stores i know,but i have no idea how to edit the page
wat do

[Anonymous No.6264100]

>>6264096
Click edit and copy paste another country.

[Anonymous No.6264163]

>>6264162
Ooohhh shittttt nigga

[Anonymous No.6264168]

>>6264162
Why not use the wiki logo

[Anonymous No.6264170]

>>6264162

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.6264179]

>>6264162
use the /fa/ hitler youth logo on the wiki page
makes more sense that way

[Anonymous No.6264181]

>>6264170
The gloves although cool looking, do make the outfit slightly creepy.

[Anonymous No.6264185]

>>6264162

[Anonymous No.6264191]

>>6264162
Use the wiki logo please

[Anonymous No.6264201]

>>6264162

[Anonymous No.6264203]

>>6264162

[Anonymous No.6264205]

>>6264162

[Anonymous No.6264209]

>>6264203
Make it more visible and were good to go

[Anonymous No.6264214]

>>6264209

[Anonymous No.6264217]

>>6264214
i think it should be less rude
like maybe say "please read the sticky x"
i don't like the rudeness

[Anonymous No.6264219]

>>6264217
no.

[Anonymous No.6264220]

>>6264214
Me again, lets see you make 'read the goddam sticky' in all caps

[Anonymous No.6264221]

>>6264217

fagbot

[Anonymous No.6264222]

>>6264217
FUCK YOU

[Anonymous No.6264223]

>>6264217

[Anonymous No.6264225]

>>6264219
why not?
why do you like rudeness?
there's nothing nice about being rude

[Anonymous No.6264226]

>>6264223
yeah that's good mane
i vote for this

[Anonymous No.6264229]

>>6264220

[Anonymous No.6264230]

>>6264225
>>6264226
>>6264223


No, thats too soft and not in this boards character.

fucking mfa teir

[Anonymous No.6264233]

>>6264229
>>6264223
Can you make the font darker? Its hard to read.

[Anonymous No.6264236]

>>6264229
I like this best

[Anonymous No.6264237]

>>6264229
>/fa/
what is that beautiful typeface??

[Anonymous No.6264239]

>>6264230
this board would be a lot better if people weren't so rude, doesn't make it mfa tier

[Anonymous No.6264240]

>>6264233

[Anonymous No.6264242]

I'd suggest to remove the outer frame, so the text box is displayed larger in the thumb

[Anonymous No.6264244]

>>6264223
this is perfect

[Anonymous No.6264247]

>>6264242
i think it's better with the frame

[Anonymous No.6264246]

>>6264240
Thanks that's way better.

[Anonymous No.6264249]

>>6264237
Century Gothic lmfao I pretty much picked a random one

[Anonymous No.6264254]

>>6264230
##edge##alert##

[Anonymous No.6264256]

>>6264242
i think this one would be the most appropriate, as it should be the easiest to read.

[Anonymous No.6264259]

>>6264242

[Anonymous No.6264263]

[Anonymous No.6264275]

>>6264259
That's pretty noice. Maybe a finer font for the Read-Text, with the darker color should be readable.

[Anonymous No.6264280]

>>6264275

[Anonymous No.6264290]

>>6264162
200 hours in windows movie maker

[Anonymous No.6264293]

>>6264280
Yeah, I guess I'd go for this one.

[Anonymous No.6264300]

>>6264263

[Anonymous No.6264301]

>>6264290
10/10

[Anonymous No.6264304]

Get another logo for the wiki page too, that upscaled artifacted HY type thing looks horrible

[Anonymous No.6264310]

>>6264300

>>6264304
i agree to an extent, i like the style but the colour of the circles should be like the blue of the board

[Anonymous No.6264329]

>>6264304

[Anonymous No.6264348]

>>6264310
like this for example

>>6264329
i like it but maybe reduce the space in the shape

[Anonymous No.6264362]

>>6264348

[Anonymous No.6264371]

>>6264348
Just fucking around
>>6264362
make it narrower too

[Anonymous No.6264444]

bump

[Rook No.6264495]

>>6263766
Yeah, the jew in me always falls for the buy one buy another half off shit.

[Anonymous No.6264507]

>>6263579
vagoo infection, disgusting bitch go see a doc.

[Anonymous No.6264672]

What's with the brand reviews?

Half of them are incorrect and the other half read like promos done by someone who learnt about the brand yesterday and doesn't know anything about anything.

It's seriously embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.6264691]

>>6264672
well, the great thing about wikis is that you can FIX THEM YOURSELF

[Anonymous No.6264717]

>>6264691

It's too fucked, also I read the other sections and they're just as bad. People with very little knowledge trying to write about things they don't know.

Also being hit with a wave of realization that this is probably how most wiki's operate and I just happen to notice in this case because I know the topic.

Not to mention it also seems like these things which are incorrect are sort of accepted as fact on /fa/ so maybe because it's the /fa/ wiki they're actually correct. As long as you only read the /fa/ wiki and post on /fa/ you can for sure have these idiotic views and go completely unchallenged.

[Anonymous No.6265069]

bump

[Anonymous No.6265151]

>>6264717
Would you post some examples of the idiotic views you've found expressed on the wiki?

[OP No.6265405]

>>6264304
It's actually downscaled B-)

I think the sticky is looking bretty good. If anybody has any important questions, now's the time to ask.

[Anonymous No.6265449]

>>6265405
are you the admin?

[Anonymous No.6265455]

>>6265405


i think>>6264086
has a really good idea

[OP No.6265460]

>>6265405
The site admin, yeah.

[Anonymous No.6265474]

OP see

>>6265214

[OP No.6265476]

>>6265455
I like that idea as well. The stores page is a clusterfuck with the addition of countries, and it'd be a good way to deal with that amount of info

[banana No.6265517]

>>6264672
>>6264691
>>6264717
>>6265151

The brand reviews pages have been replaced by the opinion>>6264162
pages, they're just kruft now

>>6264162
yay

[Anonymous No.6265533]

Where the fuck is the guy who made the site? He hasn't updated anything in days. There's certain things that can't be changed without him. And I don't want to see this thing stickied until the url is changed.

home page should be on
tuxbell.com/fa

please fix this

[banana No.6265538]

>>6265533
he's right there
>>6265476

[Anonymous No.6265548]

>>6265476
Do it then

[Anonymous No.6265552]

>>6265533
what do you mean? i think its fine the way it is. the /fa/ page if for information about the board

[banana No.6265560]

>>6265552
I think he means stuff like the sidebar and deleting pages

[OP No.6265577]

>>6265548
Working on it now

>>6265560
Yes, if anybody would like a page deleted/something added to the sidebar, just ask. I'm trying to keep the sidebar free of clutter, but if there's anything I can do to it, please let me know

[Anonymous No.6265590]

>>6265577
Also just wondering how much this site costs you, you aint gonna go bankrupt on us are you.

[banana No.6265610]

>>6265590
yeah, i also wanted to know about that
how many images can we store on the wiki?

[banana No.6265605]

>>6265577
hip$ster's idea of having separate brand review pages was pretty on point, so we can get rid of the Reviews page now

pastebin of it for us to move info to other places:

http://pastebin.com/cenpaChj

[Anonymous No.6265607]

who the fuck suggested g-star for raw denim

i mean i know its an editable wiki but

really?

[OP No.6265656]

>>6265590
I have a job, and I split the cost with a friend. So funding shouldn't be a problem. Dont worry though, if I need money i'll be sure to plague the wiki with ads. /joke

>>6265605
yeah, i'll take brand reviews off the sidebar and provide a link to the pastebin.

>>6265610
~100GB of storage, so it depends on the image size. That's a lot of space for images though, so I don't imagine running out of room. I can upgrade my hosting plan and get more room if I have to.

[Anonymous No.6265667]

>>6265607
What's wrong with gstar?

Ohhh wait you just blindly hate brands you've never handled before, gotcha

[Anonymous No.6265680]

>>6265667
chill out m8
Also they tend to do weird things with pockets and have weird fits.

[Anonymous No.6265681]

>>6265577
The "about /fa/" page seems redundant. That information can be split up and put either in the Main Page or the Introduction.

also, please do this
>>6265533
it'll look better in the sticky with a smaller url unless it's simply embedded

[Anonymous No.6265689]

>>6265667
its for middle eastern men with thick silver chains and pointy shoes

tht said I have 2 pairs of unbranded gstar raws and I do wear them

[Anonymous No.6265688]

The styles page is a fucking joke.

[Anonymous No.6265690]

>>6265688
Whats wrong with it, its a wiki we can change it

[Anonymous No.6265709]

>>6265605
Shouldn't we move all the "description" info on the stores page to their own pages then?

[Anonymous No.6265712]

>>6265690
Everything, the fact that there is a styles page is a problem. The style page does nothing more than poorly homogenize the views of those sad enough to read it in the first place.

[Anonymous No.6265720]

>>6265712
english pls

[OP No.6265724]

>>6265681
Not clear on what you mean by that. The main page is on tuxbell.com/fa/majortest/, technically. I have it set up so that just typing in "tuxbell.com" redirects you there. It's really too late to change that. I can have tuxbell.com/fa/ redirect you to the main page as well, if you want

[Anonymous No.6265731]

>>6265712
There's nothing inherently wrong with it as a concept. There are different homogenous styles within fashion. It can help people new to fashion to see what some of the broad styles are. There just needs to be a note acknowledging some ambiguity about it.

[Anonymous No.6265743]

>>6265712
For people new to fashion it can be useful.

Obviously like everything on there its not to be taken as wholly fact and its is made clear that they are only archetypes.

[Anonymous No.6265737]

>>6265724
>I have it set up so that just typing in "tuxbell.com" redirects you there
i didn't know that. that's fine then

[Anonymous No.6265745]

why is the new sticky taking so long

[HailTheKingKids No.6265755]

>>6263554
>tuxbell.com/fa

I'm on lifesupport.

[Anonymous No.6265761]

>>6265731
The presentation of the whole thing is a disaster, it's like I'm reading a post by basedprophet or someone of the like. And it is inherently wrong as a concept, defining clothing as a certain style is backwards thinking and restricting.

[Anonymous No.6265767]

>>6265761
whats the alternative?

get rid of it?

[Anonymous No.6265770]

>>6265761
Quit being such a little twit. The wiki is in its first stages, and as such needs lots of work yet. Feel free to edit the page however you see fit.

[ph No.6265771]

>>6265755
I'm fucking hurt dude

[OP No.6265774]

>>6265761
What do you propose we do then? I think it's a good idea if not solely for the fact that it gives people an intro on what a style pertains to. If somebody has no clue what gothninja is, they could get a clue there.

>>6265755
Lel. Notice how I haven't addressed that suggestion yet. The suggestions page is messy. I'm trying to set up a new one on the wiki where I can reply to the suggestions.

[Anonymous No.6265776]

>>6265770
I'm not going to delete a whole page. The sticky isn't for me.

[Anonymous No.6265779]

>>6265776
whats the alternative?

[Anonymous No.6265782]

>>6265776
>The sticky isn't for me.
Then shut up and ignore it.

[HailTheKingKids No.6265784]

>>6265771
this is gonna be a gold mine.

[banana No.6265785]

>>6265776
tbh i also agree with you, but i feel that by putting a blurb at the top exposing the faults of thinking/categorizing the "styles" in that way would pretty much fix the problem. I'll get to work on it now, please help fix it once i'm done

[Anonymous No.6265787]

>>6265784
>>6265755


Yes there are good and bad suggestions, so what

[Anonymous No.6265790]

>>6265784
this ain't good.

[Anonymous No.6265792]

>>6265774
Like i said before, it just gives a poorly homogenizing view of something nonexistent. Styles are not singular or objective. Style is something personal and usually a menagerie of various influences. If anything it should be replaced with the front page of the faggot store, encouraging development of a unique and personal style.

[HailTheKingKids No.6265793]

>>6265787
I'm gonna get a qt laugh.

[banana No.6265797]

>>6265792
adding this, lel

[ph No.6265801]

>>6265784
Sick is there a most fa cigarette page yet?

[Anonymous No.6265808]

>>6265792
For the last time its nopt there as a 'HERE IS FASHION PICK ONE AND ONLY ONE'

Its to give ideas and help that person chose what aspects they cant and then create their own from there. Also it helps give an idea of what goes together for someone new to it

[HailTheKingKids No.6265815]

>>6265801
Doesn't seem to be there yet. There's always suggestions.

[banana No.6265823]

>>6265808
i can understand where he's coming from
styles don't actually matter as much if you are only concerned about your own outfits

[Anonymous No.6265847]

>>6265745
propose some text for the sticky.

I wrote up this:

New to /fa/?
Read the Sticky for information on:

Constructing a basic wardrobe
Developing a sense of taste
A list of recommended retailers
Skin care advice
Hair advice and inspiration pics

Check the catalog before starting the following threads: WAYWT, Tumblr threads, Cop or Not, and Recent Cop threads.

Also, anyone have suggestions for a picture for the sticky post?

[Anonymous No.6265853]

>>6264290
THIS

[Anonymous No.6265862]

>>6265847
look earlier in the thread

[OP No.6265870]

>>6265847
Anybody can change the front page. If you would like to put that up and provide the appropriate links, please do.

[ZHIELY No.6265874]

>>6265847
I have a feeling that someone who's new enough to need a sticky isn't going to be starting WAYWT, Cop or Not, or Recent Cop threads.

[Anonymous No.6265880]

>>6265870
No, I meant for the stickied post on /fa/.

[Anonymous No.6265883]

>>6265874
I'd like to have it there just so people no excuse to do it

[Anonymous No.6265897]

>>6264162

[lelders !!/ohr2r2sqBf No.6265906]

>>6264290
this is amazen

[Anonymous No.6265931]

>>6265906
i'm so sick of rick

[Anonymous No.6265932]

>that horrible unoriginal generic wiki layout
>everybody actually following through with it
I'm ashamed of you /fa/. You're terrible.

[Anonymous No.6265935]

I made some changes to the hairs section, what do you guys think

[Anonymous No.6265941]

>>6265932
yeah, the layout is shit, but it's about the content i suppose

[Anonymous No.6265950]

Was gonna make a gallery for tumblrcore when i realises its basically street wear but more internet trendy

[Anonymous No.6265952]

>>6265935
what, under grooming?

[Anonymous No.6265966]

>>6265952
yeah

[OP No.6265983]

>>6265880
Ohhh, gotcha. I thought you meant the front page. Yeah, a brief list about what's on the sticky would be good. I second it, but it's up to the mods.

>>6265932
You could be helpful and provide an alternative.

[Anonymous No.6266007]

I'll be contribooting by adding romanian shops then.

[Anonymous No.6266008]

>>6265966
did you add the hair inspo links? that's good. i still need to upload my collection

[Anonymous No.6266033]

>>6266008
Yea

[Anonymous No.6266073]

>Artisinal/Post-Glamour/post-Glam Rock Post-slimane Dior

this section on the style page is kind of bs. Like what did the person that wrote this want to talk about? Gothninja? Anti-fashion? Independant brands? Putting MMM, Rick, "Post-Slimane Dior" and Yohji as brands that follow thi style is kind of messy and stupid, seeing as those brands have completely diff aesthetics. I propose changing it to either talk about "Gothninja", even though I personally don't like the pigeonholing characteristic of the term (maybe we should call it Dark fashion?, seeing as it may be less exclusive to other spinoff styles), because we constantly use the term on /fa/. I'm ready to write something

Also a LOT of the images are very bad, and I have a ton on my HD that would be more appropriate for streetwear, techwear, #menswear, etc. How do you upload images on the wiki? I'm not really experienced in wiki formatting. Pic related would be great on the Y-3 page for example imo

[Anonymous No.6266090]

>>6265808
You didnt understand anything I said. The sticky is for you.

[Anonymous No.6266091]

>>6266073
you're goddamn right.

I think it should be avant guard with a berief description of the popular artists, then saying there is more.

Also for the pics just use any image uploader and replace them.

I really hate the streetwear, tumblrcore and avant guard pics right now.

[banana No.6266094]

>>6266073
i don't know much about it, go ahead and fix it if you want

obv most of what is wron with that section is organizing it as "gothninja"

perhaps a blurb at the beginning of describing that it is more a "meme" rather than a cohesive "style" would help? Suggestions welcome

[Anonymous No.6266099]

>>6266073
ok thats enough from u

[Anonymous No.6266104]

link?

[Anonymous No.6266115]

>>6266091
what like upload an imgur album and add a direct link? That's p easy I'm gonna do it rn
>>6266094
yeah there's disclaimer at the top of the style page anyway
>>6266099
?

[Anonymous No.6266126]

>>6264205
I like this

[Anonymous No.6266187]

>>6266073
To add pics you have to make an account.
Post this into the article text

[[File:insertfilenamehere.jpg|thumb|200px|footnote text would go here]]

then hit preview, click on the link and follow the instructions for adding a picture. the filename is whatever you want to call the file, not really what it's called on your hdd. the "200px" line you can change in edit mode whenever you want to alter the size of the thumbnail displayed on the page

[Anonymous No.6266198]

>>6266091
It shouldn't be avant guard. Avant Guard is a relative term. It's always going to be different. It also presupposes that gothninja hasn't already become a codified style with a set of common characteristics.

It should simply be "gothninja" because that's what we call it. If someone wants to get particular they can do that in the body text, but the heading should be "gothninja"

[Anonymous No.6266205]

>>6266187
>click on the link
that is, the link that will show up in the preview where the image would be (there won't be an image yet because you haven't uploaded one)

[Anonymous No.6266486]

>>6266198
but gothninja is just a meme

[Anonymous No.6266491]

>>6266486
I don't think you quite understand.
Gothninja is my LIFE.

[Anonymous No.6266507]

>>6265667
or maybe i dont like it because its a shitty brand that makes shitty overdesigned and distressed garbage in shitty fits with shitty fabrics while being enormously overpriced.

does g-star even make raw denim? denim from "g-star raw" isn't actually raw yo

[Anonymous No.6266510]

hey guys i've been trying to work on the glossary the best I can,
can anybody think of /fa/ buzzwords or words used on /fa/ a lot
I'd like it to be put under the navbar eventually
http://tuxbell.com/fa/majortest/index.php?title=Glossary

[Anonymous No.6266523]

>>6265667
or maybe it's because they offer ugly over-designed clothes with bad pre-distressing and poor quality materials while being enormously overpriced.

[Anonymous No.6266554]

>>6265689
G-star is, indeed, for middle-eastern, second-rate, third-generation, low-class immigrants who don toilet seat beards and fake gold chains while smelling like they just overdosed on cheap cologne and garlic.
You can judge the shit on its own merit, but that's the truth.

[Anonymous No.6266816]

How does someone even try to edit the mens basics page? The way it's written is totalitarian as fuck. There is no perfect fitting t-shirt so why even try to define it? I probably have 3-4 different shaped t-shirts in my closet and I run a really minimal set up. For example if I'm wearing a t-shirt under a blazer the length of the blazer for me will define the length of the t-shirt. Or sometimes I have a pant with really cool front pocket detailing that I want to show off, then I'm going to wear a much shorter (almost cropped t-shirt) to expose that. Or if I'm layering a lot of black and want to break it up I might wear a coloured tall tee that would hang beneath a hoody and tank. Widths are the same deal if I wanted a really tailored fit I'd be looking at something like 19" pit to pit but I have stuff like t's with kimono sleeves that go up to 25" and look chill as hell.

Also what is this bullshit about everyone needs to own crew and vnecks? I think I've owned one v-neck tee in my entire life, frankly I think they look douchey, not saying someone can't wear them and look great but the idea that everyone should is stupid. The colour choices are fine but then again it's pretty hard to criticize black, white, and grey.

Also the dress shirts category is kind of fucked because it mentions business attire. If you want to talk about that make it an entirely separate page or maybe someone needs to write that the whole page is for business wear, that would certainly eliminate all my t-shirt criticisms. But then again who the fuck actually goes onto /fa/ for advice on business attire? It's such a small segment of the population and yet almost the entire page is written from that perspective. Like just skimming for example, look at this shit:

>Jeans are very casual and shouldn't be worn anywhere other than a casual setting.

It's not a good primer for how to get started, it's an instruction booklet for how to be a lemming.

[OP No.6266840]

>>6266816
inb4 "change something if you don't like it"

[banana No.6266847]

>>6266816
if you see something glaringly wrong it can be removed

I'm wondering if we should split basics into two things:

1: Lemming-core, for the neckbeardy dudes who come here to ask dumb/easy questions but don't want to go any further than that because of whatever reason

2: An actually good basics page

Do you guys think this is good or just unneccesary

[Anonymous No.6267068]

>>6266510
fuccboi, nextlvl, dadcore, gothninja, chinowanker. i thought the glossary was going to be for actual words, though, not buzzwords

[Anonymous No.6267133]

Someone seriously removed Heroin Chic but left Tumblrcore?

Come the fuck on. Put it back or delete both together.

[banana No.6267138]

>>6267133
sieg removed it, I didn't even notice

[Anonymous No.6267148]

Perhaps the Styles page could be (Life)Styles. They all look like shit if a random suburban John Doe tries it.

Besides, half of style is mentality.

[Anonymous No.6267170]

>>6267138
I wonder why. Heroin Chic is even historically relevant to fashion (anthropologically). It was what came before looking fit and healthy was in.

Tumblrcore is a niche and irrelevant comparing to HC that basically changed the masses' mindset.

[Anonymous No.6267197]

>>6267170
stop

[banana No.6267201]

>>6267170
should we swap them out? we could just put tumblrcore in purgatory with lunarcore

[Anonymous No.6267206]

>>6267201
put back lunarcore, i liked that entry

[banana No.6267208]

>>6267197
could you elaborate
I honestly don't know, i feel HC is kind of a buzzword but I don't know the details

[Anonymous No.6267213]

>>6267208
it is a buzzword, thats why I said stop

[Anonymous No.6267225]

>>6267201
In my personal opinion, yes. The styles page should be for solid styles, not niches and trends.

Perhaps make a separate page for them? Tumblrcore, lunarcore, seapunk, etc.

[Anonymous No.6267226]

Guys, I mentioned heroin chic as a joke a couple months back - IT IS A TROLL

[banana No.6267239]

>>6267213
o ok

>>6267206
I know its neat and cool and all but it may confuse beginners, tbh all it is right now is a collection of inspo poet gathered

it doesn't even exist

[Anonymous No.6267243]

>>6267226
you didnt invent the term heroin chic

stop

[Anonymous No.6267249]

>>6267197
>>6267208
>>6267213

Heroin Chic is a term, not a buzzword. It is widely used in fashion publications. Even Vogue has used it.
Like I said before, it is historically relevant, and not only in fashion but in behavior as well.

[banana No.6267255]

>>6267243
he just said mentioned

>>6267225
i have them on the talk page atm, what would you suggest?

[Anonymous No.6267259]

>>6267243
>implying

I sure as hell made all you faggots born in '95 aware of it

[banana No.6267260]

>>6267249
i felt it was a buzzword on /fa/, like how we say gothninja, which in reality encompasses a bunch of different stuff

[Anonymous No.6267266]

>>6267239
It doesn't even exist? It's in my fucking Fashion History class at Uni.

Just google around a bit, even wikipedia explains how it came to be, who did it first, etc.

Heroin Chic is one of the reasons we all see skinny emaciated people in fashion, for fuck's sake.

[banana No.6267273]

>>6267266
i was talking about lunarcore bro

[Anonymous No.6267280]

>>6267255
You mean, what to do with them? Put HC back in Styles, create a separate "Trends" or "Niches" or whatever in the side links.

Insert tumblr/lunar/seapunk, and let us provide examples and all that.

[banana No.6267284]

>>6267280
i'm not the admin i can't do side links
i can make the trends page though give me a sec

i feel some people will be angry that it exists tho

[Anonymous No.6267282]

>>6267260

Given that you don't know much, aren't you not in the best position to say what is or isn't factually or historically accurate?

[banana No.6267296]

>>6267282
ur not understanding what i'm saying dude ur readin my posts wrong

i was saying the was it was spoken about on /fa/ was buzzwordy, not the thing itself

like obv the designers who are "gothninja" aren't buzzwordy but referring to them in that way is

[Anonymous No.6267297]

>>6267273
Sorry, misread the link thanks to the other fags complaining.

[Anonymous No.6267301]

>>6267239
>doesn't even exist
how dare you

[Anonymous No.6267303]

>>6267296

Right, but if you didn't know that the phrase is an actual phrase used to describe a certain movement in fashion, then you aren't really the best person to judge the usefulness of any given term or phrase, no?

[banana No.6267307]

>>6267303
i knew THAT obv

>>6267297
gotcha

>>6267301
lel

[Anonymous No.6267321]

>>6267284
Let them be angry. As long as it's adding knowledge (even if it's knowledge related to edgy teenagers), it's good for the wiki. It can be anything to do with fashion and that people can easily google.

This wiki is a door sign to newfags, it will help avoid people asking us if such and such is /fa/.

[banana No.6267329]

>>6267321
good reasoning

page: http://tuxbell.com/fa/majortest/index.php?title=Trends

[Anonymous No.6267335]

>>6267307
Yeah, I have to admit people saying non-sense (in a serious way) about actual facts rustles my jimmies deeply. Sorry about that.

[Anonymous No.6267350]

>>6267329
Great. I will add Seapunk, I've been seeing it pop up quite a bit lately. Any other suggestions?

[banana No.6267358]

>>6267335
gotcha np

>>6267350
not rly
i wonder if trends will become a shitstorm with stuff like steampunk and emo and goth
seapunk and tumblr are pretty intertwined now right? its not something I pay attention to

[Anonymous No.6267402]

>>6267358
Yes, but just because Tumblr is a social media site, it became an easier way for the enthusiasts to share their little niche into the world. Now it's swarming with new people.

[Anonymous No.6268038]

>>6267280
Heroin chic is not a style. It has nothing to do with clothing. It's a "look" that's just about being pale and gaunt, having dark circles, etc.

And seapunk is hardly even a thing. It's not worth mentioning. Let's not bog the page down in trends with no longevity or significance.

[banana No.6268043]

>>6268038
there's a separate trends page now

[Anonymous No.6268046]

>>6267329
Please don't put stuff on another page. If you want to do something on trends just put it on the styles page in it's own section

[banana No.6268049]

>>6268046
the problem is I don't want to clog up the styles page with stuff like seapunk/post-internet/whatever

if you have a reason why it should go on i'm all ears thoughhh

[Anonymous No.6268069]

>>6268049
Because I'd rather see one page with a lot of content than dozens of disparate pages with little content and a cluttered navigation bar.

Also, people need to remember the purpose of a sticky. It's not to give a stage to express every fashion idea that pops into your head. It's to help people and give solid, reasonable advice about distinct, significant topics.

[banana No.6268104]

>>6268069
well the styles page isn't complete yet anyway, and trends isn't important enough to add to the sidebar

the reason i added trends wuz cuz people disputed things like tumblrcore and lunarcore being on the styles page, so i just made a new page for it. It would be strange to divide mishmash them together.

I figure they wanted stuff like that added because people come in here asking about different trends so having them on the wiki helps. Technically, the only thing it changes other than it existing is a sentence at the top of styles which links to it

[Anonymous No.6268148]

>>6268104
I think it would make enough sense to people to just do a ==number two header== for Styles and then one on the bottom for trends. They're the same basic thing, one is just more ephemeral than the other. Though, honestly, Seapunk is the only legitimate trend on that page and I don't even think it's a thing anymore.

[banana No.6268185]

>>6268148
actually that concept seems fine to me, never visualized it like that
doing......

[Anonymous No.6270272]

bump

[banana No.6270290]

>>6270272
what ever happened to that mod

[Anonymous No.6270655]

>>6270290
ikr
mod where are you

[Anonymous No.6270657]

>>6263554
>with the "moot"
my seids

[Anonymous No.6270662]

>>6270657
THANK YOU BASED MOOT

[banana No.6270667]

>>6270657
THANK YOU BASED MOOT

[Anonymous No.6270683]

>>6270290
>>6270655

Yeah the sticky was taken down a day ago

[Anonymous No.6270685]

>>6270657
THANK YOU BASED MOOT

[Anonymous No.6270705]

>>6270657
THANK YOU BASED MOOT

[Anonymous No.6270724]

>>6270657

THANK YOU BASED MOOT

[Anonymous No.6270739]

>>6270657
THANK YOU BASED MOOT

[Anonymous No.6270740]

Why are there some stores that were in the old sticky but have haven't even been mentioned in the new one?

[Anonymous No.6270741]

>>6270740
ADD THEM BASED MOOT

[Anonymous No.6270790]

>>6270657
THANK YOU BASED MOOT

[Anonymous No.6270787]

>>6270741
THANK YOU BASED MOOT

[Anonymous No.6270921]

BASED MOD WHEREFORE ART THOU

[Anonymous No.6272682]

bump

[Anonymous No.6273496]

>>6263579
eat better. more fruit and veggies, less fat/processed meat

[Anonymous No.6275483]

Thinking it might be a good idea to have a "Best of WAYWT" section? Just selecting a few of the best fits from each WAYWT to make a nice catalogue of decent fits from real people on /fa/.

[Anonymous No.6275538]

>>6275483
That would be almost as bad as the tripfag page.

Maybe it'd work if you didn't call it "BEST of wawyt"

[Anonymous No.6275553]

>>6275538
Why would it be bad?
What would you suggest calling it?

[tripskmobile No.6275563]

>>6275538
Maybe "outfits of /fa/" but that's better suited to a tumblr, not a wiki gallery

[Anonymous No.6275568]

>>6275563
yeah that's actually a pretty good idea to have a tumblr

[Anonymous No.6275575]

>>6275553
It would be bad because no fit is universally liked, so people would be adding/removing pictures like crazy. >>6275538 is a good example - I really liked the fit, but a majority didn't.

Just call the page "WAYWT of /fa/" or something simple and leave it at that.

[Anonymous No.6275587]

>>6275575
or not have the page at all and just go to a WAYWT

also new thread >>6272543

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.6275606]

>>6266073
i changed that section to discuss those styles rather than "avant garde" anthing can be avant garde

and the section talks about all 3 of those styles

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.6275618]

>>6265607
g star raw denim is the pioneer of raw denim
back in the early 00's it is the only remaning non selvedge raw denim mainstay brand eveything else uses non selvedge raw denim as an entry level or diffusion pricepoint

[Anonymous No.6275629]

>>6275618
>>6275606
which one is thr real seig heil?

[tripskmobile No.6275639]

>>6275629
Ptobably both real based on style + grammar

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.6275676]

removed tumblr section:
14 year old girl social networking fads that were not actually worn in public should not be listed next to Ralph lauren purple label, or yohji yammamoto

fucking disgracing their work.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.6275683]

>>6275639
that and you can see my IP address, tripmod

or should I find and post your nudes and see how fast they get deleted so we can find out again?

also removed the post saying that only "levis 511 and 514" are good

slim.skinny and tapered pants fits removed

yohji hakuma and tom ford pant breaks are VERY desirable

[Mifune No.6275690]

>>6275683
Trip is a mod now? WE HAVE MODS on /fa/??

why on earth are there still so many shit posters...

[Anonymous No.6275698]

>>6275639
Its not the real one. Real sieg would never write "yammamoto"

[Anonymous No.6275705]

>>6275683
Why are you removing things instead of modifying or adding?

[Anonymous No.6275707]

>>6275690
She isn't. All mods are global. There are no board specific mods.

[Anonymous No.6275710]

>>6275690
tripskank has basically been here since the beginning du, tho im not sure if shes a mod. i know she was a mod on that subreddit or something but idk 4sure

[Anonymous No.6275717]

>>6275705
hes right though, that tumblrcore thins is retarded.

the vast majority of it is just streetwear anyway.

[sieg heil !szTe0VDR1w No.6275753]

>>6275705
I am adding, im also editing down nonsense

you don't want noobs in here begging for more "moon-core" brands do you?