[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 28 KB, 503x268, fashion-rick-owens-men-s-high-top-boots-shoes-2cd5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6245375 No.6245375 [Reply] [Original]

I hate to make the 1 millionth thread but I have a question for those who know more about color co-ordination than I do.

Which ones would be best to cop out of all 3 colorways? I want to incorporate them into my clothing style

Above the waist i wear mostly lightish colours such as beige and grey and also black . As well as drapey shirts
Below the waist, only raws, some salvaged torn blue skinny jeans, black jeans and occasional chino shorts.

again sorry for making this thread, I don't come here much. pls help a fuccboi

>> No.6245387

Cop the full black ones and change it to white laces

>> No.6245386

>>6245375
the ones on the right
now fuck off and never return

>> No.6245390

fuck off loser

>> No.6245398

It's black or white. Literally goes with anything b stop over thinking

>> No.6245399

You should not be wearing Geobaskets if you still struggle with color coordination.

but to answer your question, black is the safest colorway. the black/white mix is a lot louder.

>> No.6245407

>>6245399
I usually don't but these shoes are fairly loud to begin with so I want to make sure i'm not going to fuck up. And yeah yeah I know they are fakes and that means I already fucked up but whatever.

So the general consensus is black? I saw a really dope fit with all black once. The white ones look nice as well, does anyone have any fits with those on?

>> No.6245431
File: 598 KB, 673x680, 1369532141334.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6245431

>Posts neutral color shoes
>How do I coordinate?
>Pic related

>> No.6245433

>>6245431
I have mild autism, sorry man i obsess with these stupid things

>> No.6245454 [DELETED] 

>>6245433

Alright bro, here's a pretty straightforward tool for color coordination. When doing muted colors/neutrals use the colorblind options on the top right and play around with the "full colorblindness" and "atypical chromaticism" settings on. In fact, leave those on for now, it's easier to start off with neutrals/muted colors and work your way into bold and colorful combinations.

>> No.6245455

>go to that site
>search for my size (13)
>sort price high to low
>100 different rick owens in every size, $200 each
>ships from korea
ahahaha i don't think so

>> No.6245458

>>6245433
Alright bro, here's a pretty straightforward tool for color coordination.

http://colorschemedesigner.com/

When doing muted colors/neutrals use the colorblind options on the top right and play around with the "full colorblindness" and "atypical chromaticism" settings on. In fact, leave those on for now, it's easier to start off with neutrals/muted colors and work your way into bold and colorful combinations.

>> No.6245472
File: 59 KB, 517x812, earth tone inspiration.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6245472

>>6245458
>http://colorschemedesigner.com/

Wow, this tool is extremely helpful. Thanks for showing it to me.

OP, here's another good tool: http://www.colourlovers.com/palettes

>> No.6245475

>>6245455
I'm buying these and it says it will take 1-3 days to deliver to where i'm at so i wonder where they ship from
http://www.ioffer.com/i/fashion-rick-owens-men-s-high-top-boots-shoes-539109660
>>6245458
This is great. Thank you for showing it to me

>> No.6245481

>>6245472

That one is a bit more adventurous, and may not apply to clothing at times seeing as the schemes there are user submitted.

You could end up with an atrocity like this: http://www.colourlovers.com/palette/2876317/thinkin_tink

>> No.6245485

>>6245475
you know everything on ioffer is fake, right?

>> No.6245494

>>6245485
Yes i am fully aware. I just like the look of the shoe

>> No.6245498 [DELETED] 

>>6245475

Remember, when in doubt stick with the "atypical monochromatism" options in "complement" or "analogic" modes.

>> No.6245504 [DELETED] 

>>6245498
Remember, when in doubt stick with the "complement" or "analogic" options in "atypical monochromatism" mode.

>> No.6245506

>>6245475

Remember, when in doubt stick with the "complement" or "analogic" options in "atypical monochromatism" mode.

>> No.6245761
File: 91 KB, 598x784, vKtlVff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6245761

anyone have pics of these IRL yet??

cmon this has been around for a while lets see some actual fit pics
(also do these fit TTS? half up/down?)

>> No.6245885

>>6245761
BUMP SOMEONE POST PICS

>> No.6246512

I have these fakes. Someone post me a nice picture and i will take pics

>> No.6246541

I might sound like a pleb, but w2c real geos

>> No.6248266
File: 451 KB, 2203x2937, upRzNfL - Imgur.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6248266

>>6246512
post them

>> No.6248276
File: 628 KB, 541x720, animal.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6248276

>>6248266
>sfw board
why can't you follow the rules?

fuccbois #thirsty af

post the fake rick sneaks I want a good chuckle

>> No.6248296
File: 767 KB, 2448x3264, i4ufqkQ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6248296

>>6248276
>implying you can tell the difference

>> No.6248309

>>6248276
It's fucking girl butts

Don't sit and stare it it full res. like an idiot

How hard is that

>> No.6248312

>>6248296
most people can, mostly you get what you pay for. Prove otherwise.

>> No.6248326
File: 50 KB, 570x427, 01-570x427[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6248326

>>6248296
fakes are easy as fuck to spot

even fakes of less-expensive shit still look herby as fuck

>trying to replicate a $1200 sneaker
>for $130
there *is* a markup on Ricky sneaks but it's not that bad lol

>> No.6248343

>>6248326
That fake is clearly a horribly done fake.
You people on your high horse with the genuine products and are against fakes should get off your high horse, just let whoever wants to buy fakes buy fakes, it's their choice.

>> No.6248345

>>6248326
Yes it is. You're implying that it costs nearly 1200 to make those sneakers.
The mark up on "high fashion" articles is always ridiculous. You aren't paying for the item you're paying for the name. I'd guarantee the mark up on those is AT LEAST $800

>> No.6248352

>>6248326
>both look like feces
geriatric shoes, legit

>> No.6248364

>>6248326
Let's say I don't have 1200$ to spend on shoes but I want some Geos, what should I cop?
Really there isn't a lot of sneakers in this style

>> No.6248373
File: 174 KB, 1600x1200, CIMG2267[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6248373

>>6248343
idk if people cop fakes but they should expect some people to laugh about it

These guys are fashion victims who think they need to imitate some #highfashion steeze in order to look good.

>>6248345
sorry brubruh not about to argue about the logistics behind fashion

even if the markup *is* that high (which I doubt), it's still a $400 pair of sneakers.

How much did the $130 dickboxes cost to make? Like $20.....
>you still think they are going to look exactly the same

cop some adibos dude nobody's gonna know

>> No.6248374

>>6248364
most Nike hi-tops, Supra Skytops, basically any sneaker company that does a bit more eccentric designs
And don't you start talking about quality now

>> No.6248377

>>6248364
fake Geos

Supras

>> No.6248381

>>6248364
what is it that you're looking for? Just a high top sneaker?

>> No.6248387

>>6248373
rick owns dreambox brah, the leather is just a bit shittier and wont last as long

>> No.6248391

>>6248373
While I respect your opinion on this matter, I don't feel as if the individuals purchasing fakes are fashion victims. You're correct to a point, I'm sure some people buy fakes in order to look good/show off, to which then they are. However their are individuals who simply like the style but can't commit to spending so much on an article of clothing, whatever the reason is.
Also sure some people will laugh, but I bet a majority won't care that you own fakes unless they were really that arrogant.

>> No.6248390

>>6248377
>>6248377
Arent supras just sk8 shoes though? they look highschool tier

>> No.6248393

>>6248373
I want fake Geos because I like how they look. I don't particularly care that they're "designer", I just like high tops, and they're about as high as you can get. I don't have 1200 to spend on shoes, so if there's a more reasonable option it only makes sense. all the people on this board who jerk off about "MUH SHIT TIER QUALITY" probably don't understand that every pair of shoes is made in a sweatshop, fakes are no different.
If I did have a disgusting amount of disposable income, I'd probably order fakes, and if the quality was really as abysmal as /fa/ screams, I'd get real ones.

>> No.6248397

>>6248390
So do Geos.

>> No.6248398

>>6248364
MMM, KVA, Silent, Schmid, National Standard, Android Homme, Adidas Slvr, AllSaints, if you have the wardrobe for geos sneakers by any of these labels will fit into your wardrobe. If you want geos just look around ebay and sufu they'll pop up sooner or later. Buying knocks offs is usually a bad idea.

>> No.6248409
File: 18 KB, 500x500, duck ovens.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6248409

>>6248390
you've obviously been on this board for more than 10 minutes.
If you legitimately care that people of a different age than you/Justin Bieber (most prominent example) wear them, you should be naked all the time. There will always people you might not like who will wear things you do like. Being an adult is not giving a shit about plebs.
Supra has loads of styles, I suggest you look at their selection before blowing them off because an imageboard told you to. If you see something you like/think can make a good fit out of, get them. Supra is kind of the epitome of high tops, Skytop II's are 2nd in high only to Geos.

>> No.6248424

>>6248409
I wouldn't cop supras, their leather is shit even for the price.

>> No.6248430

>>6248409
do you have any photos of fits with them? I want to start wearing Hightops and im looking for inspos for really any hightop

>> No.6248427

>>6248409
I really really hate the sole on supras

>> No.6248441

>>6248409
Yeah, supras get no love on this board

Been trying to tell you guys for months - they more than likely have a poorfag equivalent of the designer shoe you want

It's just regurgitated, and passed off at a price skateboarders are used to

>> No.6248576 [DELETED] 

>>6248441
>Yeah, supras get no love on this board
because they're so fucking ugly

>> No.6248579

>>6248441
>Yeah, supras get no love on this board
because they are so fucking ugly

>> No.6248581

>>6248576
It's not my fault newfags pick out the ugliest pair of supras, nikes, etc - then come here and ask if they're cool

>> No.6248767
File: 143 KB, 494x332, 1363766589978.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6248767

>>6248424
>>6248427
>>6248441
I've got 2 pairs, one is flashy (sorta) and one is basic. When I bought them, they were my main pair for months at a time. Neither have fallen apart in any way (maybe the insides have started peeling a little, but that's just kinda what happens with skate shoes), but one pair I fucked the back corner of the soles because I used to walk like a dingus. I guess people have had horror stories, but my experiences have been all positive. There's also the off chance that those people bought fakes, because Supras are popular enough to warrant it, and the prices are pretty much the same.

>>6248430
unfortunately no, but there are entire communities devoted to high tops, so just google around a little. you could try to start a thread here, just make sure to avoid the word Supra.

>> No.6249191

Fake shoes always made of that shiny plastic shit? Or just almost always made of that shiny plastic shit.

>> No.6249948
File: 73 KB, 490x750, 1361857799465.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6249948

someone post pics of these shoes IRL god dammit

>> No.6249969

>>6248345

You pay for the design and quality as well.

>> No.6249983

>>6249948
I fucking knew it, Rick.

>> No.6250011

>>6249948
someone posted a pic of the ioffer dunks before

they look like shit, obviously fake and obviously crap quality. literally don't even look like ricks

the dreambox geos i've seen pics of don't look that bad, quality of materials is worse it seems but everything else is about approximate

>> No.6250083
File: 1.05 MB, 3264x2448, rickydickydunks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250083

>>6250011
Saved that one,

it's comically bad.

>> No.6250094
File: 2.28 MB, 2848x3744, um.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250094

>>6249983
I-is Rick homosex?? ;_;

>> No.6250095

>>6250083
yup that was the one

just as bad the second time jesus christ

>> No.6250098

>>6250094
he's bisexual

>> No.6250116
File: 887 KB, 1920x2560, typicalfalurker.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250116

>>6250098
Fucking faggot.. At least be the one receiving the head.

>> No.6250133

>>6250098
ew that nigga love dick
hell naw i refuse to cop

>> No.6250149

>>6250133
top lel

>> No.6250192

>>6250133
cop fakes so you dont give money to the homosex

>> No.6250228

If you're thinking of getting fakes. Get the dreambox ones. It's your safest bet. These they can never get right. Only the full black ones look alright

>> No.6250319
File: 366 KB, 800x531, fakessss.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250319

I will post some pics that i posted before, not mine though

>> No.6250324
File: 248 KB, 800x531, fakesese.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250324

>>6250319

>> No.6250327
File: 313 KB, 800x531, fakesssse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250327

>>6250324

>> No.6250328

>>6250116
>>6250133
>>6250192
>2013
>not liking dick
what are you guys some kind of faggots

>> No.6250332
File: 1.10 MB, 2048x1536, fakey dinkys.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250332

>>6250327

>> No.6250334
File: 2.09 MB, 2592x1936, fak 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250334

>>6250332

>> No.6250340

>>6250334
wow those look really good for fakes

>> No.6250336
File: 2.02 MB, 2592x1936, fak 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250336

>>6250334

>> No.6250342
File: 1.95 MB, 2592x1936, fak 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250342

>>6250336

>> No.6250345
File: 89 KB, 500x500, fake dinks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250345

>>6250342

>> No.6250351
File: 164 KB, 580x432, fake kva.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250351

>>6250345
kva

>> No.6250355
File: 1.60 MB, 2592x1936, fakes more.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250355

>>6250351

>> No.6250353

>>6250345
Damn, look real. These are dreamboxes?

>> No.6250362
File: 378 KB, 1280x960, fakesa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250362

>>6250355

>> No.6250365
File: 307 KB, 1944x2592, fakess.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250365

>>6250362

>> No.6250367

>>6250355
>>6250362
>>6250365

this looks pretty fucking legit.

>> No.6250369

>>6250353
http://www.ioffer.com/i/2009-rick-owens-stlye-men-s-luxury-shoes!-539924329
No these are not the dreambox ones. The ones in the picture are these I believe

>> No.6250373
File: 1.73 MB, 1826x814, ff compare.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6250373

>>6250365
Your welcome, now please save these pictures so I don't have to post them again when this thread is made tomorrow.

>> No.6250384

someone cop mine size 42 ffs

>>6250365
these ones
thats my pic

>> No.6250392

>>6250351
W2c?

>> No.6250391

>>6250362
this is my pair, i was the first to get them
>mfw everyone hated them and laughed at me
now everyone is wanting to cop them
fuck you all

>> No.6250393

>>6250384
what US size would that fit in Nike, or clarks db for example?

>> No.6250396

>>6250094
Shh keep it down, Rick thinks she's a man, don't tell anyone!

>> No.6250417

>>6250393
like an 8.5 or so in clarks UK sizes

42 is size 9 in american sizes

>> No.6250539

>>6250384
you too good for them now fuccboi?

>> No.6250565

>>6250539
some pussyboi always says something like this


yeah ill rock them w/ a bucket hat

>> No.6250641

Kriss van assche makes some baller hightops, they're like really high too if that's what you're looking for.

>> No.6250832

>>6250565
ill give you 800 euro for them, no more because i dont have any mre