/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.6097590]

Shoe collection thread
this one is mine I have
South beach air max jr
Skyline air max X athletic west
Gold nike sb
Nike black & yellow
Polo boots
Nike lebron 10
Bape flash
Supra vaider purple

[Anonymous No.6097602]

leave

[that nig with an E30 !ePUl/AW9M2 No.6097605]

are you a 15 year old who lives in austrilia

[Anonymous No.6097628]

SwAg XDDD YOLO

[Anonymous No.6097639]

>>6097590
fuccboi

[Anonymous No.6097643]

>>6097605
ǝʇɐɯ 81 ɯı ou ןoן

[Anonymous No.6097699]

>>6097590
I have the same pair of Griffey's, but I can't think of much to wear with them.

[Anonymous No.6098487]

>>6097590
OP confirmed for Australian

[tinfoil !!gVL0FyzPeMv No.6098517]

i need new shoes

[Anonymous No.6098526]

>>6097639

lol @ ppl posting my shoe collection and calling other ppl fuccbois

[Anonymous No.6098541]

>>6097602
>>6097628
>Has sneaker collection
>Automatically seen as Hypebeast

[no No.6098556]

>>6098517
this nigga bought the h&mmms

[Anonymous No.6098561]

>>6098556

It makes me sad that anybody bought them.

[tinfoil !!gVL0FyzPeMv No.6098566]

>>6098556
yeah they were on sale so i thought why not
i wish they had the white ones tho red shoes are stupid

[Anonymous No.6098569]

>>6098517
wow what a horseshit collection

[no No.6098594]

>>6098566

[Anonymous No.6098684]

[Anonymous No.6098699]

[Anonymous No.6098720]

>>6098684
>>6098699

>all that money wasted on shitty shoes that could have gone to a decent pair of designer

these are the faggots bitching about spending over $200 on a pair of shoes

[magntess !146FIGmXbc No.6098721]

I know it`s a small collection but I´m still building it up.

[Anonymous No.6098737]

>>6098684
do you do a lot of running?

[Anonymous No.6098762]

>>6098721
sauce on center and front?

[Anonymous No.6098767]

>>6098721
They all look nice though, which is hard to say about some of these people that have a shit ton of shoes

[Anonymous No.6098768]

>>6098737

i run about 3 times a week. switch up between the free runs and the flyknits

play basketball at least twice a week. usually wear either the lebron 9s or the alpha 1s. the kobes are great for bball but i just dont trust the low tops

[Anonymous No.6098803]

>>6098721
sauce on left and front also?

[magntess !146FIGmXbc No.6098827]

>>6098803
>>6098762
front is Lloyd hector
http://www.lloyd-shop.de/herrenschuhe-hector-1303260004.aspx

middle is belmondo
http://www.belmondo.de/en/men/en-exotica_men

>>6098767
thanks.

[Anonymous No.6098850]

I should really buy an actual camera.

[Anonymous No.6098891]

>>6098850
suede desert malis in the center back? i have the beeswax ones :3

[Anonymous No.6098910]

>>6098891
They're beeswax, just really dusty/dirty.

[Anonymous No.6099546]

>>6098721
w2c those espadrilles in the back right?

[magntess !146FIGmXbc No.6099986]

>>6099546
h&m.
but if you can buy ´em from someone different because the quality is shit.

[Anonymous No.6100001]

>>6098850
Are those 1461's? I'm really thinking of copping but I've been on the fence for weeks

[Anonymous No.6100025]

>>6100001
Yup. I bought them as work shoes because they have a good non-slip sole, but the leather quality and construction seem fairly good for such a cheap shoe. I'd go for it if you like the style.

[Anonymous No.6100059]

[Anonymous No.6100065]

>>6099986
>>6099546
cop these instead
http://www.lagarconne.com/store/item.htm?itemid=19510&sid=1495&pid=

[Anonymous No.6100083]

>>6098768
I was thinking of getting either Roshes, Free Runs or Flyknits, and I was thinking, how does Free Runs compare to Flyknits in terms of comfort?

[Anonymous No.6100080]

mine~~~~~

[Anonymous No.6100092]

>>6100080
nice grensons, how long have you had them?

[Anonymous No.6100112]

>>6100092
a few weeks. The right foot fits me like a glove, the left does except for being annoyingly tight in one spot, and I've been "suffering for fashion" as I try to break it in. But I like them. As of that picture they had never been worn.

[zero No.6100118]

>>6100080
how old are you?

[Anonymous No.6100128]

>>6100118
21

[zero No.6100150]

>>6100128
a ok, that's a really nice collection, those yuketens are sweet, i can see u looking like a tryhard wearing them sometimes tho

[Anonymous No.6100173]

>>6100150
rude

[Anonymous No.6100181]

not really that fashionable but the antigravity maks them 10/10

[magntess !146FIGmXbc No.6100206]

>>6100065
wow they look really nice.

[Anonymous No.6100298]

>>6100150
eh, I guess I don't think that way. to me it's not a statement thing, or a style thing, I just like shoes and I like leather and they look and feel pretty nice to me

I don't match it with other camo or anything like that

[Anonymous No.6100322]

>>6100059
what are bottom middle? They look pretty cool.

[Anonymous No.6100346]

>>6100322
look like vans vault to me, or vans era

[Anonymous No.6100606]

>>6097590
lame

>>6097639
gay golfninja wannabe fuccboi

>>6098517
Not really worth posting

>>6098684
Sneaker head fuccboi. I can't even tell your sex.

>>6098699
few nice basics, lots of gay obnoxious shit

>>6098721
glues-on soles. lol @ people saying they look nice

>>6098850
meh. how wide are your feet?

>>6100059
clean your shoes

>>6100080
not bad...

[Anonymous No.6100617]

>>6098850
>how wide are your feet
E. Life is pain.

[Anonymous No.6100639]

>>6100083

depends on what flyknits you get. theres trainers, racers, and lunar ones

the flyknit ones will be comfiest, but the tongue tends to go to the side when you run for a long time. id run in free runs if the distance is 5 miles or under. If you run closer to ten miles id go and buy either brooks or asics

[Anonymous No.6100656]

>>6100080
sauce on front right?

[Anonymous No.6100660]

>>6100606
No one cares.

[Anonymous No.6100673]

Meh.

[Anonymous No.6100709]

>>6100322
DQM for vans FW 2012 I think, somehow found them all the way over here in Colorado.

[Anonymous No.6100776]

>>6100773
h by hudson* sorry

[Anonymous No.6100773]

>>6100656
h by

they're ok

[Anonymous No.6100827]

>>6098684
>dem olympic 6's
I came.

[Anonymous No.6100837]

>>6098684
Fuck 11's

[Anonymous No.6100927]

>vans era leather
>dress shoes
>musty, battle-scarred cons

I'm only into-ing /fa/ggotry

I have a long way to go

[Anonymous No.6100931]

>>6097639
>>6098721
>>6100059

merlin

[Anonymous No.6101266]

>>6100927
cons are ok

vans are ugly

dress shoes are HELLA UGLY dude

it's okay though you just need to find an entry point into fashion, everyone starts somewhere. when I started all I had was a pair of sperry top-siders.

[Anonymous No.6101324]

>>6097590
buy a bed that you can fcuk on fuccboi

[Anonymous No.6101385]

>>6098850
>putting pennies in your penny loafers
Could you try a little harder please?

[Anonymous No.6101436]

>mfw everyone in this thread is a fuccboi

[Anonymous No.6101470]

>>6101266
I hope you mean his vans are ugly.

[Anonymous No.6101474]

>>6101436
Here is mine

Lanvin, Rick, Raf, Visvim, Raf, Prada

[Anonymous No.6101475]

>>6101266
>implying top-siders are ugly.

I don't even care if I'm a fuccboi.

[Anonymous No.6101477]

>>6101474
solid. no real need to elaborate

[Anonymous No.6101483]

>>6098594
is tha a man or cara deligve

[Anonymous No.6101491]

>>6101474
wow neat you got those prada creepers

[Anonymous No.6101494]

>>6101474
post fit with ramones or prada creepers

[Anonymous No.6101509]

>>6101494
They're unlaced geobaskets

and no fuck off I lurk because /fa/ is funny, that's all. If /fa/ was actually into fashion then i would but as a whole they're not so I won't.

Also some fuccboi desert boot wearing piece of shit would talk shit and not post fit.

[Anonymous No.6101522]

>>6101509
just do me a favor :3

[Anonymous No.6101528]

>>6101509

i dont blame you

idk why i even post sometimes

[Anonymous No.6101548]

>>6100931
leather and shape on the bottom right look like shit. invest in quality dress shoes

[Anonymous No.6101552]

>>6101436

[Anonymous No.6101563]

>>6101474
hnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnng

internet, but the best internet u can get

[Anonymous No.6101575]

>>6101522
Here is a taste. Enjoy the shitty quality from my shitty phone. Geos would look better laced up but jesus fucking christ is it annoying

they look better without laces with shorts anyway

Over shirt is damir doma undershirt is Ann d pants are rick owens and shoes are geobaskets

no shitstorm please

[Anonymous No.6101582]

>>6101563
sorry what the fuck are you talking about??

[Anonymous No.6101585]

>>6101582
like fuckin south korean internet

[Anonymous No.6101588]

>>6101575

one of the few not poor people on /fa/ congrats

[Anonymous No.6101590]

>>6101575
wow that looks really bad

[Anonymous No.6101601]

>>6101585
are you saying those aren't my shoes? or trying to give me an internet?

[Anonymous No.6101602]

Ignore shoes on top left please. These a e all the shoes i own so it goes back 3 or 4 yrs

[Anonymous No.6101604]

>>6101602
forgot to post pic, here goes

[Anonymous No.6101605]

>>6101602

ok im ignoring them

[Anonymous No.6101610]

>>6101590
lol see? talk shit post fit

[Anonymous No.6101613]

>>6101610

he wont they never do

[Anonymous No.6101614]

>>6101601
was jus bein a dick how dem shoes are hot on the internets, but they all nice af.

do visvims run small?

[Anonymous No.6101617]

>>6101601
he means that your post is the epitome of internet, or well fa forum's ideal collection

you have the "raf simons rick owens"
and the prada creepers

[Anonymous No.6101629]

>>6101614
very slightly

I wear 9s in most things, my Visvims are 9s but bordering on too small. I would size up half a size if I bought another pair but they are very wearable.

[Anonymous No.6101636]

>>6101617
yeah I am a huge fucking tool

I would like to get some ro dunks as well but can't really find a pair in my size in a color scheme I like

[Anonymous No.6101644]

>>6101636
the internet has good taste lol

[Anonymous No.6101660]

>>6101644

agree, it has a way of filtering out shitty clothes, it makes it pretty easy to research what brands do decent designs, etc.

[Anonymous No.6101689]

>>6101474
Here are some more for when I need to tone it down or just look like a dad

mmm, wolverine, junya watanabe x trickers, ferragamo, tom ford, gucci (gift, shit quality for price), more lanvin

[Anonymous No.6101733]

>>6101689
>dat paint splattered MMM

[Anonymous No.6101739]

>>6101470
duh
>>6101475
they're not, I still wear mine sometimes, but there are much nicer boat shoes out there and they're not versatile as one's only shoes

[Anonymous No.6101744]

>>6101733
lol they are goofy

People literally ask me if I had an accident every time I wear them.

[Anonymous No.6101766]

>>6101744
They just don't understand. What do you say to them?

>n-no they're supposed to be that way

[Anonymous No.6101783]

>>6101766

>what do you say to them?

say "theyre margiela" like its obvious

when you expect them to know, they wont give you shit.

[Anonymous No.6101785]

>>6101509
you know, I get tired of all the cheap shit on here too sometimes, and the dad fits, and the wannabe ninjas, and all of it; but don't sit there and talk like you're 'above' this board when you use the same dumbass lingo as everyone else and your one claim to that pretense is more money. your collection has the same shoes that everyone on this board gets wet in the pants for (the prada creepers; the geos; that particular VISVIM shoe; the rafs) and the only difference I can see is that you were actually able to buy them, well good for you, but I'm not convinced that you have any right to boast.

[Anonymous No.6101802]

>>6101575
that's your parents' bathroom isn't it

[Anonymous No.6101805]

>>6101785

I kinda dont blame him, so many posters here are full of shit and dont actually care enough about fashion to even buy the shit they constantly reblog on their tumblrs.

[Anonymous No.6101840]

>>6101805
What's wrong with being just an observer?

Fashion isn't for everyone. I spend my money elsewhere. I enjoy looking and analyzing fits and lines quietly. Like reading a book, or engaging with any artistic medium. I just don't aspire to dress up. I guess I' probably wrong for it, but in my mind, it doesn't really strike me that way.

[Anonymous No.6101844]

>>6101840
looking at*
I'm*

[Anonymous No.6101848]

>>6101805
what makes them full of shit though?

you say they don't care enough but how do you know they care less? what about a guy working a shitty job barely making rent payments? there's more reason that guy would have for not buying geobaskets than just not caring enough

and I'm not saying this guy is, but for all we know, what if he was just a spoiled kid with rich parents? besides, who said fashion had to be the #1 thing you care about lest you be 'full of shit'? Can't people admire high fashion from a distance? I mean fuck, I like CCP but I wouldn't dream of buying it, it just makes no sense for my life and my budget. And there are some things I also like to spend money on which might come first, like furniture, or another hobby, or gourmet foods, or whatever.

The only reason we have for hating people who reblog stuff they can't afford is that they give the appearance of something being more ubiquitous, more common, than it ought to seem. You'd never get the impression, if you didn't use the internet, that rick owens was popular. and the internet lets people without geos make geos look popular. the high price of entry is part of what makes fashion so rewarding, and tumblr shit erodes that sense a bit, I know this; but lashing out against these people is not rational.

[Anonymous No.6101861]

>>6101848

"The only reason we have for hating people who reblog stuff they can't afford is that they give the appearance of something being more ubiquitous, more common, than it ought to seem. You'd never get the impression, if you didn't use the internet, that rick owens was popular. and the internet lets people without geos make geos look popular. the high price of entry is part of what makes fashion so rewarding, and tumblr shit erodes that sense a bit, I know this; but lashing out against these people is not rational."

Nicely put. I get sucked into the trap of the ever rising standard of "normal" pushed by image reoccurance. I get down from time to time about being "so far behind" the curve, but it's just an illusion from propagation.

Thanks for vocalizing that.

[Anonymous No.6101863]

>>6101840

absolutely nothing is wrong with being an observer. But quite frequently I see "observers" pass judgement on actual participators as though their opinions and thoughts are on the same level as the actual participants, which i think is fairly naive. For example, do you think the person who reblogs 2 detail photos of a damir doma overcoat can judge the quality of someone who wears one every other day, hangs it up in their closet, and puts it on the next day?

>>6101848

To me what makes them full of shit is that people pass judgement, and make extremely presumptuous critical judgements with no knowledge to back them up.

>you say they don't care enough but how do you know they care less? what about a guy working a shitty job barely making rent payments? there's more reason that guy would have for not buying geobaskets than just not caring enough

>and I'm not saying this guy is, but for all we know, what if he was just a spoiled kid with rich parents? besides, who said fashion had to be the #1 thing you care about lest you be 'full of shit'? Can't people admire high fashion from a distance? I mean fuck, I like CCP but I wouldn't dream of buying it, it just makes no sense for my life and my budget. And there are some things I also like to spend money on which might come first, like furniture, or another hobby, or gourmet foods, or whatever.

Everyone has different priorities. Thats fine with me.

[None !SHRUGSESIA No.6101877]

>>6098850
what are the top right and are they good?

[Anonymous No.6101875]

>>6101863
That's the truth. People should just be kinder in general, but that goes without saying for all things.

I stay shut up as a matter of those same principles. As they say about he who casts the first stone...

[Anonymous No.6101881]

>>6101636
same here, 2 hours ago i participated in an ebay bid for these dark brown dunks, in the last 9 minutes my 900 bid got shot out by 1525 and sold for 1775~

*well that escalated quickly

[super street sweeper No.6101886]

>>6101575
why do you act like you're better than everyone when that fit is generic as fuck.

>b-but muh designer brands

not even hating on your threads. the shit attitude just doesn't make sense

[Anonymous No.6101911]

>>6101863
guy that unsurprisingly caused shitstorm here

this is exactly my perspective. it is ironic that this guy is upset that I seem to come off as superior because of my expensive collection of shoes because I knew this shit would happen as soon as I posted. I'm not better than anyone else because i have a shoe collection worth god knows how much. I am confident however that I know more about fashion than the average /fa/ poster because I do more than just talk about RO and Julius and damir doma and visvim because i wear the shit. i can authoritatively speak about the quality and whether or not it was worth the cost to me.

the reason I seem like an asshole is because I am an asshole. Here is my asshole perspective. so many people on fa are the biggest fucking posers. They run around talking about how bad ass Rick is or how other people look like dads without even being into the style - instead, they are into the idea of the style. /fa/ has romanticized the goth ninja aesthetic to a weird level where people wearing black jeans black t shirt and vans are lauded as "minimalist next level gothninja." maybe i am a huge hypocrite because I buy hype pieces like creepers and velcros and geobaskets. I don't care, I like the way they look. I also have a givenchy Rottweiler hoodie. So what?

Well I just took a long time to ramble and say nothing. Sorry. Tldr is I am an asshole that thinks I am better than CDB wearers because they are plebs and my outfit costs more than their whole wardrobe.

[Anonymous No.6101921]

>>6101881

what the fuck 1775

I bought my milk/dust dunks for about $550 in similar condition, the prices on those are crazy.

>>6101875

Yeah, i think its an issue thats a bigger problem w/ internet culture than /fa/ specifically. A lot of people just dont realize how ignorant they really are until they meet someone with a lot more experience than they have. After working under a sample maker that had 60 years of experience making clothing/leathergoods, i realized that i should shut the fuck up and try and learn something.

everyone here thinks theyre experts of aesthetics or some shit, and i dont blame the above poster for not wanting to deal with peoples bullshit.

[Anonymous No.6101926]

>>6101886
idk mr. trip. maybe you should post a fit and rain down your warm knowledge all over my mouth

or more likely you won't do shit and will continue telling me how shit I am.

[Anonymous No.6101960]

>>6101956
to get*

[super street sweeper No.6101955]

>>6101926
>that cop out reply tho
>doesn't even know what a trip is

[Anonymous No.6101956]

>>6101921
How'd you get into the pseudo apprenticeship (from how it sounds, I know you never suggested it was) with the sample maker?

How would you suggest people get educated on clothing if they are out of the money and can't find someone to (or don't have to the time to get) connected with like you have? Any book suggestions by chance?

[Σ▼ƦƟ/ƒ▲/Ğ No.6101963]

>>6101921
Seems like a reasonable price. Bit of spit and polish really.

[Anonymous No.6101998]

>>6101956

hands down the best way to get educated on clothing is to actually make it in my opinion. If you dont have the time/energy to do that, educate yourself about how its made. Whatever media works for you, youtube, documentaries, textbooks, old tailors magazines, asking people you know, taking clothes apart. there no one thing. Read about how the stuff you wear is put together. I dont really have any book recommendations as i only really look at textbooks, and scans of old tailors drafts and magazines and guides.

you get apprenticeships/work/whatever by talking to people and putting yourself into situations where people like that are. For example, i got that apprenticeship while i was working in a warehouse repairing old camera equipment. A person came in and told me that they ran a factory that made boots. I asked if he was interested in having someone work for him part time.

[Anonymous No.6102000]

>>6101955
you really are a shitposter

people like you are the reason that half the threads on /fa/ are terrible. you did exactly what I expected, just keep shit talking without posting a fit. can't say I am surprised, especially from some no name piece of trash.

[Anonymous No.6102005]

>>6101863
alright, I see your point. yeah, dweebs in nikes and H&M ripping on your designer clothes is annoying. well, I'd say it's a problem when anyone claims more knowledge than they have; but you can have opinions on some aspects of fits and aesthetics without having owned high fashion pieces. I don't think it's unfair for someone to voice their opinion on the fit of someone who is wearing clothes he can't afford himself; people still look like what they look like, and make what impressions they make, and none of that depends on intimate knowledge of what the cloth feels like or what it is like to wear.

>>6101911
yeah, you can speak about quality, worth the cost, and all other things that require having owned the piece. of course. and anyone who tries to argue you on these points without having also owned said pieces is a moron. but that's not what you said people would criticize. the most I see on /fa/ is people saying something does or doesn't look good, and aside from lack of a certain knowledge of how things reflect light in-person, they are legitimately eligible to judge this.

as an aside: it may be easier for you to dismiss critics when you think they're upset, but you have little reason to believe I am, nor would it make any difference to what I'm saying if I were.

>>6101861
I guess I feel like if everyone tried to describe why they think as they do and be honest, and tried to understand one another, argument would be more fruitful, and we'd all be better-off

[super street sweeper No.6102018]

>>6102000
why are you so bitter? damn

[Anonymous No.6102022]

>>6101998
Great post. I really appreciate the time you put into it.I'm going to take it all down in notepad.

I need a hobby anyway. I guess there's no reason tailoring and designing can't be it. Thanks for the inspiration, I hope your career develops where you'll be the one with sixty years experience taking on people like yourself now.

[Anonymous No.6102032]

>>6101548
>Judging leather by digital images.

[Anonymous No.6102035]

>>6102005

I am the faggot that posted the bathroom fit.

The problem is that fashion is so subjective and what looks good or doesn't look good varies so much from person to person. I don't criticize people when they wear their Levi's and uniqlo and wingtips; all I want is the same courtesy when I wear shit that I like. Nothing is more frustrating when some completely ignorant asshole says that my fit looks like shit because I'm not wearing his uniform or conforming to his ideal. I'm not saying that my fit is perfect or even good but unless you post a fit of your own of an outfit that I personally like, I will not take advice from you.

[Anonymous No.6102041]

>>6102005

>alright, I see your point. yeah, dweebs in nikes and H&M ripping on your designer clothes is annoying. well, I'd say it's a problem when anyone claims more knowledge than they have; but you can have opinions on some aspects of fits and aesthetics without having owned high fashion pieces.

Yes they can have their opinions, but if all they wear are nike and h&m all of their opinions about clothing and aesthetics are colored by what they put on their body. They choose to go shopping at h&m because it appeals to them, they like the aesthetic or theyd go to a different mass market store or buy thrifted clothes.

They are trying to establish a viewpoint on something thats way out of their depth. Theyre welcome to their opinion, but it really doesnt count for anything. Its the same reason why an art historians' opinion on a 1650s drawing counts a lot more than mine, they have a better education.

>>6101963

Yeah i wasnt really concerned about the price/condition, the suede looks nice and ages well.

[Anonymous No.6102054]

>>6102035

exactly, if you post an outfit decked out in old rick gear with sexy layering, ill take your opinion much more seriously.

[Anonymous No.6102072]

>>6102018
Is this you

[super street sweeper No.6102087]

>>6102072
ya I figured I'd post it in a relevant thread

[Anonymous No.6102103]

>>6102087

its funny that youre calling that other dudes fit generic. youre not exactly the king of innovation there bro

[Anonymous No.6102114]

>>6101474

DAMN how you pay for all that ish?

[super street sweeper No.6102127]

>>6102103
I don't have anything to prove

[SteppingOnSnails !n1DVvRNifE No.6102120]

OP are you in Australia????????

[Anonymous No.6102135]

>>6102087
When you call my drop crotch sweat, oversized tee raw hemmed shirt with geobaskets boring and generic i would expect you to be some decked out ccp wearing bad ass

The term fuccboi has never been more relevant.

[Anonymous No.6102139]

>>6102127
Then why are you namefagging exactly?

[Anonymous No.6102141]

>>6102018
I don't think we can safely call him bitter, but it takes some lack of common decency to call people pieces of trash. Either he's not someone I'd personally like to know, or he's not serious in saying it.

It's no wonder nobody posts a fit when we know exactly what the point would be. Let's see what faults he can find to discredit my point without addressing the point itself. Asking someone to post a fit is a defense mechanism. But if what someone says has any value in it, and it's sufficiently communicated (I'm not saying it usually is, but it can be), no picture of the person to lend authority to the point is really necessary. And if the post contains little valuable information, then you can take it to be only as serious as knowing the stated opinion of one anonymous person. This has some small value to it.

this can be a response to
>>6102035
as well.

>their opinions about clothing and aesthetics are colored by what they put on their body.
I'd say that their opinions are reflected in* what they put on their body.

You presume a lot when you say you have more knowledge; in one dimension, yes. But all of us are heirs to a wealth of personal experience with looking at people and their clothing in various contexts and making aesthetic judgments of our own; and the fact that you cannot acknowledge that the opinions of these people could "count for anything" is your error. That you talk about them like they are human garbage is, well, something else entirely.

[Anonymous No.6102145]

>>6102072
>>6102103

HAHAHAH FUCKIN #REKT

"you are what's wrong with this board these days"

[Anonymous No.6102149]

>>6102127

youre right, im just glad you posted that because it basically confirms all the points i was making about people being out of their depth. cheers!

[Anonymous No.6102181]

>>6102141

>But all of us are heirs to a wealth of personal experience with looking at people and their clothing in various contexts and making aesthetic judgments of our own

This is a very key point, that im glad you made. The thing about clothing, is that the "context" youre talking about is the person. Everyone here has a different career/education, place they grew up, family, culture, and wealth. All of these things color the way we dress, and give us the context in which we wear our clothes. The reason why other peoples opinions arent very worthy (i hesitate to say worthless) is because they have no idea why we dress the way we do, or any information about our "context" which is key in judging the quality of peoples outfits. You dont know someone better than they know themself.

[hip$ster No.6102187]

>>6102149
I bet you think everything around you confirms all your personal biases all the time

that's how they construct themselves, personal biases. they conform to the world around you a little bit at a time until you get comfortable with how you think about everything and everything confirms what you already think. have you ever noticed how everyone you meet knows exactly how the world works? that's how they do it.

well, to me you come across as an egotist and a jackass but I'm sure that fits in your view somewhere. I'm probably out of my depth here too, right? well, cheers! and don't think too hard, lest your self-importance come crashing down.

[Anonymous No.6102193]

>>6102181

also: The reason why some people who dress in a similar way have more valuable opinions, is because they probably have a lot more in common with you in terms of context to judge the quality of your outfit.

[super street sweeper No.6102197]

>>6102135
>ccp

why do people cum at the sight of that name holy shit. same level as hypebeasts with supreme.

you posted your fit to justify you're elitist post, yet what really separates you from all of the other people decked out in the same style? almost literally the same thing has been posted by trips last year

?????????????? what the??

what does my fit have to do with the way you're acting?

[Anonymous No.6102207]

>>6102187

>I bet you think everything around you confirms all your personal biases all the time

Completely agree, youre right, youre also right in that pretty much everyone is that way.

>well, to me you come across as an egotist and a jackass but I'm sure that fits in your view somewhere. I'm probably out of my depth here too, right? well, cheers! and don't think too hard, lest your self-importance come crashing down.

Its funny that youre saying that, because my whole argument was against peoples self importance, and trying to be more humble in regards to how other people dress if its much different from the way you do. And yeah im an egotist, i would never deny that.

[Anonymous No.6102217]

>>6102120

slept on
had a laff but maybe cus im high as fuk

[Anonymous No.6102223]

>>6102197

>you're elitist post

fuccboi

[Anonymous No.6102254]

>>6102181
By context I meant it in the more traditional sense; the difference between dressing like a pilgrim at a party versus dressing like a pilgrim and being a pilgrim, etc. But I'll address your point about the uniqueness of each person's own context.

You can figure out for yourself whether other people know enough to comment on your own clothing from what they say. I've received good information from people with tastes that are totally different from mine, because sometimes their observation is relevant in spite of our differences of opinion. And sometimes a totally different opinion is useful because it comes from a different perspective.

In any case my main complaint in the beginning was directed to the language of superiority; the separation of the less worthy from the more worthy, and so on. I don't think my opinion has changed.

>>6102197
well if you're against boring and against generic, ccp is neither and thus would make sense. I don't think you're right to say everyone "cums" at the name, there are a few people who think it's too weird to understand and thus mention it; and a few people who deeply appreciate the strange impressions it gives off with its odd twists and mutations on traditional clothing. Both groups are likely to drop its name in a kind of reverence whenever the question of 'out-there' comes up partially because it's hard to think of another brand that is weird in the same degree. they amount to an audible group but I don't think it's everyone.

[Anonymous No.6102275]

>>6102254

>You can figure out for yourself whether other people know enough to comment on your own clothing from what they say. I've received good information from people with tastes that are totally different from mine, because sometimes their observation is relevant in spite of our differences of opinion.

Yeah i can agree, i have received interesting criticism, and was able to tell that the person in question knew enough to give a decent critique.

>And sometimes a totally different opinion is useful because it comes from a different perspective.

This raises another point. Useful for what? It depends on what youre trying to achieve with your outfit i suppose.

>In any case my main complaint in the beginning was directed to the language of superiority; the separation of the less worthy from the more worthy, and so on. I don't think my opinion has changed.

Well what do you think qualifies someone to have a worthy opinion? To me its always been knowledge about the topic at hand, but im sure it varies from person to person.

[Anonymous No.6102294]

>>6102254
and I'll just add that I'm going to bed right now so if I don't respond to your next post (if there is one), that's why. I think you did a fair job of clarifying where it is you really stand, but obviously I still find the mentality of it troubling. I think you started off bolder than what you really think, which is a good thing given what you were saying, but the classification-ism of it all doesn't impress me. I'm glad you were willing for a discussion and I'm sorry I have to cut it off. It's better to air out differences of opinion than to just call each others fuccbois and say "post fit" so this has been totally worthwhile.

one last point since your post just popped up,

>Well what do you think qualifies someone to have a worthy opinion?
I'm of the belief that argument from authority is meaningless, and anyone can say something worthwhile; what qualifies their opinion's worth is how it passes inspection. This, put simply, is how it essentially is in the sciences. And that's how all people should be on a board if discussion is what the board is about.

Anyway, good night, and thanks for humoring me by responding, I do appreciate it.

[Anonymous No.6102307]

>>6102294

>I'm of the belief that argument from authority is meaningless, and anyone can say something worthwhile; what qualifies their opinion's worth is how it passes inspection. This, put simply, is how it essentially is in the sciences. And that's how all people should be on a board if discussion is what the board is about.

Youre right, i think we will have to agree to disagree, I think a person's knowledge is incredibly important. To me there are far to many people polluting everything with uninformed ideas which id much rather not sift through. A kind of naive hope, but its what id like nonetheless. Its the same reason I take an experienced tailors advice on altering a garment more seriously than a fashion student of one year.

>Anyway, good night, and thanks for humoring me by responding, I do appreciate it

Cheers, good discussion.

[Anonymous No.6102311]

>>6101575

not really that bad but that overshirt honestly looks terrible with the rest

[SteppingOnSnails !n1DVvRNifE No.6102320]

lol are you guys still arguing?

fyi the rest of us are trying to enjoy casemod threads and ur making me have to scroll down all the time

pls stop

[Anonymous No.6102336]

>>6102320

nah done, the other dude went to sleep.

[Anonymous No.6102384]

>>6101575
>dat tiled floor
if only my daddy was rich 2

[Anonymous No.6102396]

>>6102320
>can't hide a thread
heh, tripfags

[Anonymous No.6102920]

>>6102072
Is that Crew black or navy? I can't tell.

[Anonymous No.6103019]

>>6098850
sauce on front center?

[Anonymous No.6103033]

>>6098721
I recognized your shoes, you are my hero

[Anonymous No.6103066]

>>6100927
ditch these awful squared-toe shoes

[lelders !!/ohr2r2sqBf No.6103133]

just the ones i wear

[Anonymous No.6103142]

>>6103133
have you sold the dreamboxes yet?

[Anonymous No.6103149]

>>6103133
u r one spoiled cunt arent ya m8 gettin mummy to buy all ur shit fucking pathetic

[Anonymous No.6103155]

>>6103133

still doesnt have a half decent fit

[lelders !!/ohr2r2sqBf No.6103173]

>>6103142
na anyone wanna cop them
sz 42

[Anonymous No.6103181]

>>6103149
its not his fault your mom's poor

[Anonymous No.6103857]

>>6100322
Vans Sk8 high. Not a fan personally

[Anonymous No.6104141]

Anyone here own anything from box fresh?
I love the look of a lot of em but they feel like they will fall apart in a few months.

[Anonymous No.6104211]

>>6100606
>gay golfninja wannabe fuccboi
talkshit postfit

[Anonymous No.6104265]

>>6101385
>being so poor that you can't afford to put pennies in your loafers
>>6101877
Thorogood x Epaulet #685 horsehide boots. They're beastly, especially for $260. They were a limited run, so you'd have to search eBay or something for a pair.
>>6103019
PF Flyer's windjammers.

[Anonymous No.6105511]

>>6103133
is it sad that I immediately knew it was you because I recognized the shoe collection? the mmms and the flyknits gave it away

though I did wonder about where the fake geos went

[KALOKAGATHIA !BRBRzbi9s6 No.6105532]

>>6098541
>patent red shoe
>supra
>baby blue/pink shoe
>nike dunk
>lebron 10
>suddenly a boot
lmfao you gotta be kidding me.

[KALOKAGATHIA !BRBRzbi9s6 No.6105596]

i'm at home, so old goofy shoes.
I want you guys to rate me the pic. For some reason I can't find my old nike SBs

[Anonymous No.6106101]

>>6097590
>supra vaider purple
Bieber pls go

[Anonymous No.6106129]

>>6105596

Entirely low tier sneakers. I don't think any of those are made in italy.

[Anonymous No.6106218]

>>6105596
mmm loving those powder blue 87's

[Anonymous No.6108131]

>>6105596
>getting all white Supras
nigga, I know they look good in pictures, but they're a recipe for distaster

[Anonymous No.6108172]

>>6098684
>>6098699
>owning more than 0 pairs of Jordans

[Anonymous No.6108173]

I also got some black flyknits.

[Anonymous No.6108177]

>>6108173
2nd to left
cps?

[KALOKAGATHIA !BRBRzbi9s6 No.6108180]

>>6108131
in my defense, I was 14.
I think I wore this shoe five times.

[Anonymous No.6108197]

[Anonymous No.6108217]

[Anonymous No.6108220]

>>6108180
I love me some Supras, and wanted all whites, but realized they would turn shit brown instantaneously (New England)

[Anonymous No.6108229]

>>6108217

[turbo cunt No.6110084]

>>6100080
best one ITT for me. those camo yuks look gr8

posted mine before. copped the nike powerlines 2 in obsidian recently to add to this