[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 31 KB, 270x270, logo_96_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6010564 No.6010564[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

The old thread is dead, all hail the thread

>> No.6010572
File: 75 KB, 800x800, img_4125_800_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6010572

Thoughts anyone?

>> No.6010576
File: 59 KB, 800x800, img_2175_800_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6010576

>> No.6010593

>>6010572

not diggin

>> No.6010599

>>6010593
Yeah I was thinking they were a bit too tumblr. How bout the bag?

>> No.6010721

bump

>> No.6010731
File: 194 KB, 666x698, Screen Shot 2013-04-21 at 8.54.59 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6010731

>> No.6010787

>>6010572
maybe, suitable for things like hiking I guess. No for casual use
>>6010576
No
>>6010731
No

>> No.6011045
File: 153 KB, 250x330, 9598.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6011045

Thinking of getting this, with a Royal blue Corded Vest and bowtie, Royal Blue satin pocketsquare. How fucked am I? I am a tall skinny guy, white, mousy brown hair.

>> No.6012616
File: 126 KB, 1444x471, Weekender Bags.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6012616

Which one should I get?

Or is there another option for a canvas weekender bag <$150?

>> No.6012671
File: 25 KB, 270x300, problackolive.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6012671

>> No.6012720
File: 14 KB, 290x370, image1xbbl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6012720

I coped these, should I return? I think I might and get ll bean engineers instead

>> No.6012721

>>6012616
I like the downeaster

>> No.6012727
File: 66 KB, 1200x2000, 713INC_ZANEROBE_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6012727

http://www.zanerobe.com/store/?product=slingshot-denimo-washed-black

was looking for a pair of heavily tapered black denim that'll look good with black high tops and draped tees, this seems to fit the bill pretty well. would probably take a seam ripper to the branding

>> No.6012730

>>6012727
already told u they were bad

>> No.6012729
File: 78 KB, 540x418, nike-air-yeezy-2-sneaker-00.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6012729

>> No.6012744

>>6012730
hello everyone on /fa/ how are you doing

>> No.6012750 [DELETED] 
File: 1.19 MB, 1219x857, BOOOTSS.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6012750

1/3

>> No.6012757

>>6012744
i agreed with him then (in my head), i agree with him now

get raw bro you can't go wrong

>> No.6012759

>>6012744
Imo it looks good

>> No.6012765

>>6012757

>raw black jeans

Are you retarded?

>> No.6012761 [DELETED] 
File: 70 KB, 1024x701, glasses.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6012761

2/3

>> No.6012767

>>6012727
Just get Balmain biker jeans instead.

>> No.6012774

>>6012757
don't really care about having raws, black raws either don't fade at all or fade shittily

most black jawnz i find don't have as drastic a taper as those either

i'm willing to buy something else if there's good reason to but i haven't found anything that has quite the same look. what do you guys find wrong with them anyways, out of curiosity?

>> No.6012785

>>6012720
Anyone?

>> No.6012786

>>6012767
i like balmains but they're skinny overall while i'm looking for something that's not quite baggy but just a bit loose in the top block

i also can't afford to throw over a grand at jeans right now

>> No.6012789

>>6012785
those look really cheap. boots like that should be bought durable as fuck

imo you should cough up and buy iron rangers (1k miles are ugly) but katahdins are significantly better than those i guess

>> No.6012798

>>6012789
Thanks for the input, they seemed really nice at first but they are a bit thin on the leather

>> No.6012802

>>6012750
Why is there always that one guy that posts hideous buckled boots in these threads.

Do not cop.

>> No.6012804

>>6012616
everlane one doesn't have a shoulder strap?
go for the downeaster

>> No.6012813
File: 19 KB, 241x364, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6012813

>> No.6012816
File: 39 KB, 600x575, AHI81006_NeroFino_1_grande.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6012816

Looking for a minimalist black hi-top <$300.

Anyone have any experience with Android Homme?

>> No.6012855

>>6012802
...I thought they looked good. There's no need to be so mean about it. Calling them hideous was a little harsh. I don't mean to be so thin skinned, I am hurt but certainly not angry! I'm sure you meant good intentions by this, but I can't possibly see this in the way you see it. Perhaps could you show me better alternatives? If you'd spare the time that would be helpful. As humans I'm sure we're all trying to learn and grow in the best way possible.

>> No.6012864

>>6012671
No

>> No.6012868

>>6012816
Wow those look fucking beautiful.

>> No.6012873

>>6012802
You're an asshole. Be constructive, not a fucking 5 year old using the internet without his parents permission.

>> No.6012879

>>6012816
Android Homme is quality, even AH is good.

>> No.6012923

>>6012761
autism

>> No.6012942

>>6012855
everything you linked is bad

the buckles are overdesigned and aesthetically displeasing, the leather looks cheap and the silhouette is dorky

the glasses are even worse. circular glasses flatter no ones face; really handsome people are the only ones who can get away with even simple ones. the excessive detailing on those looks like something your typical fedora and graphic tee wearer would like

>> No.6012960

>>6012942
Oh! Well I certainly don't want to wear anything too cheap looking or dorky. I can see how you'd think that. The glasses were a hit or miss but I don't want to look like or associate myself with fedora wearers. I "do" want glasses though for other reasons maybe I should perhaps pick up a more standard pair? And maybe perhaps boots without a buckle would be more suitable. Thank you for this...

>> No.6012970

>>6012816
dr marten alfies look p. similar
cheap as dirt too

>> No.6013181
File: 76 KB, 612x612, 936175_529872983721226_1243329003_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6013181

This tee is from a Shop near me called "Rad Store"
I recon it's super dope.
Definitely copping

>> No.6013221

>>6013181
kinda dumb imo
dunno why you're posting in a cop or not thread if you're already set on it

>> No.6013373

>>6012813
oooosh g, dats a mint top aye cuz

I don't reckon you should cop, the pocket's weird. But that's my opinion

>> No.6013377

>>6012970
They're good quality, I got them. Comfy as fuck too man.

>> No.6013391
File: 19 KB, 402x505, FaconnableOvershirt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6013391

>> No.6013394
File: 27 KB, 261x535, DiorWhiteJeans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6013394

>> No.6013400
File: 86 KB, 524x400, JeansVersus.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6013400

>>6010564

WHICH?!?!?!

>> No.6013408
File: 640 KB, 1920x3072, 1259401807_2_1_1[1].jpg_timestamp=136537200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6013408

Doesn't come off well in the picture, but irl you can clearly see the little floral pattern

>> No.6013414

Are horizontal striped polo shirt in general cop?

>> No.6013465

>>6013394
fuck no

>> No.6013471

>>6010572
dont cop
>>6010576
dont cop
>>6010731
dont cop
>>6011045
meh, i guess
>>6012616
right or middle
>>6012671
dont cop
>>6012720
dont cop
>>6012727
dont cop
>>6012729
dont cop
>>6012813
dont cop
>>6012816
dont cop
>>6013391
i can hardly fucking tell worst lighting
>>6013394
dont cop
>>6013400
right
>>6013408
cop

>> No.6013479

>tfw /fa/ has changed so much, you can't make heads or tails of it anymore

>> No.6013486

>>6013479
/fa/ didn't change, fashion did

>> No.6013496

>>6013486
Either way, I have a hard time coping with how quick it turned.

>> No.6013501

>>6013486
/fa/ is fashion
/fa/ literally stands for fashion
I wasn't even refering to the board
even if I was /fa/ doesn't only refer to the board here
what the fuck
that was completely uncalled for like are you fucking with me right now

>> No.6013512
File: 90 KB, 800x1200, police.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6013512

>>6010572
>>6010731
>>6012616 Middle
>>6012720
>>6012727
>>6012816
>>6013400 Right
>>6013408
Cop

>>6011045
>>6013181 If the store has a good rep, then yeah.
Meh

>>6010576
>>6012671
>>6012729
>>6012813
>>6013391
>>6013394
DNC

>> No.6013524

>>6013512
cop. reminds me of that falla out of Drive, forget his name

>> No.6013531
File: 185 KB, 1200x1800, ThePusher_06_04_13_0857.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6013531

>> No.6013698
File: 648 KB, 2000x2000, DiorJeans.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6013698

>>6013400
This is left, btw, better pic...

I feel like right is better in some ways (e.g. pulling off "street" looks) but left is cleaner.

>> No.6013716

>>6013531
I wouldn't... Too chunky for my tastes.

>> No.6014318
File: 209 KB, 460x506, BWGH_shirt_2_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014318

?

>> No.6014351

>>6013501
>>6012855
why does every thread have people getting mental breakdowns

>> No.6014355

>>6011045
Don't pussy foot, go neck tie or no tie, bow ties are the bisexuals of the neckwear world.

>> No.6014358

>>6013524
steve buscemi?

>> No.6014363 [DELETED] 
File: 407 KB, 1600x1600, $(KGrHqJ,!hoFETEUPmQsBRMQkkRGu!~~60_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014363

>> No.6014510
File: 23 KB, 290x370, quilted bomber.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014510

i've been looking for a plain black bomber for a while, this is only 30 pounds, seems like a steal. opinions?

>> No.6014519
File: 146 KB, 870x1110, bomber.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014519

>>6014510
sorry, shit photo

>> No.6014557
File: 252 KB, 493x477, campcap.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014557

should i cop for $45?

>> No.6014609

>>6014519
Looks nice bro. wr2cop?

>> No.6014616

>>6014609
>not recognizing asos

Dont cop.

>> No.6014644

>>6014519
sure you've been posting this for 3 weeks haha

>> No.6014652

>>6014644
first time I've posted it, someone else may have already. i expect plain black bombers are pretty popular.

>> No.6014655

>>6014616
yeah from asos, but its river island.

>> No.6014660
File: 36 KB, 640x960, 599865_354461311329787_1896077636_n[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014660

cop jacket?
dunno the price but looks expensive 2 me

>> No.6014669
File: 168 KB, 1571x2000, 41291139sw_14_f[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014669

$35
cop?

>> No.6014696

>>6014669
M1-A1 FUCK YEAH WHERE?

>> No.6014703
File: 414 KB, 720x960, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014703

>> No.6014710

>>6014669
YES, Rick would charge 1000 dollars for something like that.

>> No.6014718

>>6014710
His also looks 1000 times better.

>> No.6014724

>>6014710
>implying you wouldn't pay 1000 for rick's

>> No.6014731
File: 9 KB, 350x350, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014731

Thinking of picking these up for summer, but I was wondering if blue shoes with jeans would look weird.

>> No.6014798

>>6014731

Are they the same blue?

>> No.6014845
File: 1.52 MB, 3264x2448, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014845

Copped his pair of "Acne Jeans" denim shorts for 32$ the other day.
Live Chatted with a service rep at Acne's website and they said they are legit.

Good cop bad cop?

Reason I ask is I've never had denim shorts and usually they are ugly as sin.

>> No.6014863

>>6014696
>>6014710

http://www.yoox.com/us/41291139SW/item?dept=men&tp=11227&utm_campaign=affiliazione_us&utm_content=10&utm_medium=affiliazione&utm_source=linkshare_us#cod10=41291139SW&sizeId=5

>> No.6014870

>>6014863
Oh only 35 bucks? Sorry, don't want to look like a pleb in public

>> No.6014883

>>6014557
no
dont be a tumblr swagfag

>> No.6014879

>>6014318
kind of expensive for something you could get at an old peoples store for <$25

>> No.6014887
File: 29 KB, 290x370, shorts.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014887

These shorts?

>> No.6014888

>>6014845
where do they end on you? if on knee or below, bad cop

>> No.6014890

>>6014888
why would you wear shorts that go past your knees?

>> No.6014896

>>6014890
exactly what im saying

>> No.6014897

>>6014891
Depends how nerdy you are

>> No.6014891
File: 286 KB, 1200x1200, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014891

How swag would these be?

>> No.6014893

>>6014887
maybe for camping or the beach or something. looks really comfy to sit around in very casually. dont wear them to the store or in town, ok? but cool in general
is there a version without the brown band on the bottom?

>> No.6014901

>>6014893
Was thinking of for uni summer ball daytime bit, just sat watching mediocre local bands in the sun.

Not seen a version without the brown band

>> No.6014906

>>6013531
i got one. it's okay. really, really thin though. it's just one sheet of super thing fabric.

>> No.6014918
File: 34 KB, 489x383, fry.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014918

>> No.6014915

>>6014897
Faggot that ain't nerdy you'd see a swagnignog walking by in those and it wouldn't be nerdy it'd be swaaaag

>> No.6014921

>>6014918
What brand?

>> No.6014925

>>6014921
frye

it says in the filename ffs

>> No.6014923

>>6014901
that would be perfect. as long as your have fairly hairy legs

>> No.6014930

evrytime i post here nobody tells me if should cop or not
fuck this shit

>> No.6014928

>>6014923
Got that covered!

>> No.6014937

>>6014930
For me it's the opposite, I get positive replies all the time

>> No.6014940

>>6014930
probably because what you want to cop is lame, link me i'll tell you right now

>> No.6014942

>>6014937
fuck u

>> No.6014944

>>6014940
>>6014660

>> No.6014946

>>6014944
dnc

>> No.6014949
File: 125 KB, 1190x1600, 81O3FxMqmGL._SY1600_CR0,0,1190,1600_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014949

I have one of the classic Viridi-Anne shawl cardigans and it's finally starting to break down after, like, five or six years. I wanted one of the double-layered Ann "shirts" that are really cardigans off Yoox, but they're all gone since I slept on it. This is the closet alternative I can find and I'm not sure if I should do it. It's not the same length as what I'm trying to replace, but I'm okay with that. I'm just not sure about going from the draped VA collar to a shirt collar.

>> No.6014950

>>6014944
it looks p whatever, I don't like how it looks half/zipped with that piece folded over and all huge. What were you going to wear this with, with what shoes specifically?

>> No.6014958

>>6014925
iPhone you fucking retarded cunt

>> No.6014953

>>6014660

Never heard of this Argentine brand, so can't advise you on it. The only thing I'll say is that the lapel proportions seem a touch wonky, but that could also be styling.

>> No.6014963

>>6014946
>>6014950
>>6014953
dunno maybe some boots
ill see if i can find a better thinner jacket thx fa ur da best

>> No.6014969

>>6014958

Not the anon who's giving you grief, but it's also branded on the heel, too.

>> No.6014973

>>6014963
get a schott jacket on ebay

>> No.6014983

>>6014973
but i dont want a motorcyle style
i want 2 look fa
ryan gosling is my imspiration

>> No.6014985

>>6014983
>ryan gosling is my imspiration
fuck this im outta here

>> No.6014987
File: 335 KB, 450x611, aor2-parka.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014987

>> No.6014988
File: 806 KB, 1920x3072, 1259405803_2_1_1[1].jpg_timestamp=136537200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6014988

Wondering if this kind of pattern could work on anything at all

Always liked this style outside of fashion, but I'd never found any good looking way to wear them

>> No.6015010

>>6014985
can't handle le fa?
i bet u use geobaskets LOL

>> No.6015009

>>6014988

That specific paisley?

Or paisley in general?

Or that print on shoulder (faux yoke) treatment?

Not sure what you're asking about.

>> No.6015021

>>6015009
I meant paisley in general, couldn't remember the name on top of my head. Saw the shirt when my friend dragged me to zara and thought it looked kinda nice but have no idea if it can be pulled off nice

>> No.6015036
File: 82 KB, 540x360, Junya-Watanabe-paisley-shirt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015036

>>6015021

Well, lots of people have used paisley in various formats. As with any intricate pattern, it's always a question of scale and proportion.

>> No.6015050

>>6015036
Well, I give it a hard thought, and check how nice it actually looks on me. Thanks

>> No.6015047
File: 121 KB, 455x475, 186830_mrp_in_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015047

>>6015036

>> No.6015071
File: 64 KB, 650x650, 4648_3706413367-big.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015071

>> No.6015086
File: 179 KB, 300x400, 01906f5dd97667b465e7c399512f5aad.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015086

>> No.6015110
File: 373 KB, 1024x680, 8611659386_9a88cca7d1_b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015110

>> No.6015116

>>6015110
Do you want to hit on 15 year old girls?

>> No.6015119

>>6014351
idk, but its starting to freak me out

>> No.6015121

>>6014987
>aor2-parka
im going to buy that

>> No.6015127

>>6014519
I hate ALL things quilted. Quilted IMO is just THE most revolting of all clothing styles. Makes you look ugly just by having it on your body.

Get one of dem black M1 bombers, you'll thank me later!

>> No.6015142

>>6014987
Minecraft creepers all over it (it reminds me of that, don't even play the friggin' game!)

>> No.6015138

>>6014969
Implying I've ever heard of "Frye"... Not even new.

>> No.6015161

>>6015138

It was family-run until WWII and is owned by a Hong Kong-based trading company, but it's still an incredibly old company.

>> No.6015171

>>6015116
my gf is 15

>> No.6015172
File: 294 KB, 700x1665, combine_images1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015172

which tshirt tho

>> No.6015182

>>6015172
>>6015172
top[

>> No.6015195

>>6015172
none

>> No.6015196
File: 289 KB, 500x500, WBS-R-F11-1K-Original Brown-11.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015196

Cop or not?

>> No.6015198

>>6015172
wan play backgamon on u :3

>> No.6015201

>>6015196
yes

>> No.6015203

>>6015172

I imagine top is better on its own and bottom is better layered.

>> No.6015206
File: 19 KB, 300x300, 55380412_w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015206

Should I get these or White Air Force 1s? Or recommend other cool streetwear shoes

>> No.6015213
File: 39 KB, 610x610, natural-captoe-trench-boot-01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015213

>>6015196
Get these Oak Street boots instead. They're made of the same leather, but they look much nicer.

>> No.6015238
File: 207 KB, 1000x980, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015238

>> No.6015243

>>6015238
>fabrixsquare
lol no, why are you even asking?

>> No.6015250

>>6015206
no
>>6015213
yes
>>6015238
no

>> No.6015274
File: 8 KB, 546x566, 1314029819767.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015274

>>6015268

>> No.6015268

>>6015238
wtf are those KVA? the build quality looks awful

>> No.6015272

>>6015268
KVA knockoffs.

>> No.6015277
File: 124 KB, 800x533, DamirDomaBuckleShoe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015277

Just imagine the leather is smooth, I can't find a good shot of the smooth leather version.

>> No.6015281

>>6015277
probably not
can't really tell
post a fit

>> No.6015283

>>6015277
I know what they look like, cop

>> No.6015298

>>6015281
Not got any shots of people wearing them. In fact how do you even go about getting pictures of people wearing shoes in general? (Unless they're Ricks, Dunks or Jordans, then it'd be easier)

>> No.6015307

>>6015268
>Build quality looks awful

How can you tell build quality? I need a crash course in this shit.

>> No.6015308

>>6015277

I actually think the textured one is more interesting, but they aren't bad as a sleek pair of sneakers you wear with everything.

>> No.6015316
File: 34 KB, 291x436, swn_scraper_1928_0[1].jpeg_134954.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015316

>>6015298
0.26 seconds in google

>> No.6015325

>>6015308
Yeah I don't mind the textured ones either... Just thinking the smooth leather is more versatile... Could wear it with more fits. I'm gonna try out some Rick soon (love the look of the DRKSHDW line) thinking perhaps they would go well.

Of course Rick's own shoes would go well, but I've heard bad things about their build quality.

>> No.6015326
File: 21 KB, 400x266, 533616508_tp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015326

>> No.6015328

>>6015316
Ah thanks! Awesome! Looks great!

>> No.6015335

>>6015326
no
pls dont

>> No.6015338
File: 31 KB, 640x469, Puma Suede Sneaker Gray Black SQE.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015338

are these acceptable at all?

>> No.6015347
File: 75 KB, 615x409, nike-dunk-high-midnight-navy-white-21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015347

>> No.6015349

>>6015338
no

>> No.6015358

>>6015347
probably not

>> No.6015849
File: 68 KB, 762x1100, JU121A00B-917@2.1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015849

I really really really want these... but yeah i'm a boi... Do you think I could make this work with a plain white t-shirt and a gray summer vest without looking plain ridicilous? Probably not but ugh soo cute.

>> No.6015897

>>6015849
Wtf? You're a faggot. I even remember you saying in another thread you like crossdressing so why are you even asking us? You want to look like a girl.

>> No.6015905

>>6015849
werk em

>> No.6015918

>>6015849
I would go without the vest, but I think they could work fine with a plain top provided they're on the right person. A lot of more feminine prints are becoming popular in mainstream men's fashion.

>> No.6015928
File: 101 KB, 570x760, jacket.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015928

not a cop or not, just wondering what you call this style of jacket. I see old men wearing them all the time. inb4 grandadcore. I know, I won't wear it in public

>> No.6015939

>>6015849

They won't fit you well.

>> No.6015933

>>6015897
well I do not dress in public. For every day life I look just like any other guy who thinks a tiny bit more about clothes. I'll probably cop it anyway i'm just wondering if it would be acceptable to wear this in boymode...

>>6015905
you like them? they are nice aren't they.

>>6015918
omg i'm actually not getting shot down over this? awesome.

>> No.6015941

>>6015928

It's a Harrington jacket.

>> No.6015950
File: 187 KB, 550x862, Butterick_80s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015950

>>6015928
Muh Butterick

>> No.6015958

>>6015849
Only if you have 10610 thighs and want every bear to buy you a drink

>> No.6015969
File: 64 KB, 1082x1442, ric0211005blk_02_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6015969

>>6015933
not really far removed from those silly ass chubbies some dude is pushing so hard. if they end up being too short you could... utilize the return policy, or maybe have a crafty friend sew an extended lining into them, or do something like these shorts.

>>6015939
depends on the waist supression and his body composition. maybe he could buy his normal size and a size up and see how it works out.

>> No.6015973

>>6015939
The store offers free shipping and free returns on all items. So if it would fit horribly I can always return it. I was just worried about the item itself but I didn't get yelled at so thats a good thing here.

>> No.6015975

>>6015958
>10610
what

>> No.6015985

>>6015975
Meant to type 10/10 dunno where that 6 came from

Maybe I should proofread my posts

>> No.6016012 [DELETED] 
File: 345 KB, 1200x900, SocksFromBehind!.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016012

>>6015985
judge my thighs.

>> No.6016017

>>6016012
now, this seems unnecessary

>> No.6016030

>>6016012
HOLY FUCK YES!

>> No.6016031

>>6016023
yes

>> No.6016022

I am a bit drunk.

>> No.6016023

>>6016012
Wait, you're a dude?

>> No.6016024

>>6016012
:O

>> No.6016040

>>6016031
then why are you wearing women's clothing???

>> No.6016035

>>6016031
...

>> No.6016043

>>6016012
>deleted before I could load into my cache

Fuck, now do i do with this boner?

>> No.6016045

>>6016030
>>6016024
>>6016023
>>6016017
what i miss?

>> No.6016046
File: 17 KB, 319x463, gnarly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016046

>>6014891
>>6014891
>>6014891
pretty rad if you ask me

>> No.6016047

>>6016031
fapping so hard right now

>> No.6016048
File: 86 KB, 640x480, svensson.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016048

>>6012816

svensson look nicer for a little less

>> No.6016055
File: 32 KB, 635x477, RandyMarshJizz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016055

>>6016031

>> No.6016063
File: 345 KB, 1200x900, 1366668629640.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016063

>>6016045
>>6016043
judge my thighs.

>> No.6016064

>>6016031
please post another pic :)))))))

>> No.6016062

>>6015950
>>6015928
I love how these older styles got a new popularity lately

>> No.6016072

>>6016063
HHNNGNGNGNGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

>> No.6016074

oh god I got a talent for derailing threads with my need for compliments ;_; nothing to be seen here just keep going about your daily days.

>>6016048
love those.

>> No.6016077

>>6016063

stop you fucking fag

>> No.6016071

>>6016048
i was thinking of getting them. are they swaggyyyyy?

>> No.6016083
File: 49 KB, 582x550, Ape.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016083

>>6015928
Your timing is impeccable.

>> No.6016086

>>6016074
MORREEE PIICCCSSPLLEEEAASEEEEE

>> No.6016088

>>6015172
do such legs really look normal to you /fa/ggots?

/fit/izen here, those legs are comically small

>> No.6016089

>>6016077
obviously that isn't me anymore

>> No.6016094

>>6016063
probably has an ugly face like all trappers

thighs are okay, could be a bit more meaty, but the upper body is so ehhhhh especially the arms and the shoulders

>> No.6016100

>>6016088
no they don't look normal, they look skinny

there's nothing wrong with that

>> No.6016110

>>6015928
What's the difference between a Harrington and a bomber?

>> No.6016116

>>6016112

you make me feel physically ill

>> No.6016117

>>6016088
No, they go for skinny. There is now a fashion trends of skinny + bermuda

>> No.6016112

>>6016089
please post more! i will give you all the attention you want!!

>> No.6016115

>>6016094
meh you are right. sorry for posting ;_;

>> No.6016120

PLEASE JOLIEN

>> No.6016122

>>6016116
Of course he does, he is a tripfag replying to himself

>> No.6016130

>>6016117
>>6016100
fair enough

what kind of shorts do you guys recommend for someone that squats a lot and has muscular legs?

>> No.6016138
File: 283 KB, 680x931, Pointlessness_big.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016138

>so edgy

I want it pretty badly though.

>> No.6016150

>>6016138

Get it. The proportions are on point.

>> No.6016152

>>6016130
Same, bermuda

Not like you are going to find much else, haven't even seen any shorts going over knees, period

Personally, I think strong legs look better in shorts as well than skinny ones

>> No.6016146

>>6016138
david lindwall is good shit

>> No.6016148

>>6016130
chino shorts with like a 5" inseam

if you don't think you can get away with that, 7" is enough imo. show off your squatz

i don't know any particular brands, but i'd imagine j. crew has something good

>> No.6016154

http://www.luisaviaroma.com/index.aspx?#ItemSrv.ashx|SeasonId=57I&CollectionId=0B2&ItemId=2&VendorColorId=UzgwNTM=&SeasonMemoCode=actual&GenderMemoCode=men&Language=&CountryId=&SubLineMemoCode=clothing&CategoryId=109&ItemResponse=&MenuResponse=&SizeChart=false

>> No.6016159

>>6016154
can u post another pic pls....

get the shorts

>> No.6016181

>>6016159
>>6016159
shut the fuck up. this isn't soc, and the trap and trap enablers need to fuck off to a different thread

>> No.6016184

>>6016154
I meant to reply this to >>6016130
him ofcourse.

>> No.6016198

>>6016152
>>6016148
aight, that's some pretty straight forward stuff, thanks

>>6016154
I mean I prefer boys over girls, but I would never ever wear something like that, I'm not a faggot

>> No.6016204

>>6016198
Is this to faggy? ok I'm sorry I thought you wanted to flaunt your quads for the lady's.

>> No.6016203

>>6016198
>I'm not a faggot

>>>/out/

>> No.6016212

>>6016203
i was just kidding

love this board for its skinny bottom twinks

>> No.6016215
File: 43 KB, 400x533, 002_844c9754-ea82-46cf-aff9-1784d2774646.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016215

>>6016204
we are getting the same dolce & gabanna black shorts from that link are we yes?

>> No.6016223

>>6016204
I've always hated this
>/fit/izen does SS by accident
>soon the only impressive parts of his body are his back and legs
>too insecure to wear slim above the knee shorts to flaunt them glutes to the sloots

>> No.6016244
File: 24 KB, 366x366, 299475_366_45.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016244

>> No.6016246

>>6015196
100% yes

>> No.6016243
File: 233 KB, 678x506, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016243

Which one?

>> No.6016247

>>6016223
ikr those shorts are like the epitome of alpha male when you are ripped.

>>6016243
The ones on the right are vastly superior

>>6016244
nah

>> No.6016266

>>6016247
>Converse
>superior
lel
>>6016243
sk8 his

>> No.6016269

>>6016247
Alternatives for affordable summer shoe, preferably no sneakers

>> No.6016347
File: 35 KB, 460x245, topman-black-tmd-fluro-trainers-product-1-6459898-924707015_large_flex.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016347

I got these /fa/, pretty psyched about them. I want to start dressing a bit more colorful, oversized tshirts, bit more synthetic, and for the first time in ages trainers.

>> No.6016371

>>6016347

pls tell me you're joking? I mean, the rafs are bad enough, but those are fucking horrendous.

>> No.6016397 [DELETED] 

>>6016371
how are they worse than rafs. I think they are better.

>> No.6016398

>>6016347
>I want to dress a bit more colourful
>Better buy some trainers who look like they were painted by a pre-schooler.

>> No.6016411

>>6016347
Fucking /fa/ at this point I don't even know who are trolling

>> No.6016414

>>6016397

you've just bought a cheap, bastardised imitation of already-ugly rafs, what did you expect?
and they're from fucking topman, haha.

>> No.6016420 [DELETED] 

hm?

>> No.6016428
File: 58 KB, 295x443, copornot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016428

hm?

>> No.6016429
File: 514 KB, 1920x3072, 2660185070_1_1_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016429

>> No.6016431

>>6015196

1000 Miles are instacops

>> No.6016432

>>6016428
absolutely not. are you 12?

>> No.6016440

>>6016429
def cop

>> No.6016448

>>6016432
no, are you dadcore?
thought it would look good with some slim chinos and black boots

>> No.6016452

>>6016429
Would cop

If she changes her clothes that is

>> No.6016455

>>6016428
No. Get Givenchy.

>> No.6016459

>>6016138
>lifes

>> No.6016470

>>6016459
>being a pleb who cares

>> No.6016504
File: 53 KB, 500x500, 3242111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016504

>>6016397
Not joking, but I can understand it's not your taste.
>>6016371
>how are they worse than rafs. I think they are better.
I've seen the Raf ones in Copenhagen and I was doubting with those, but I feel pretty confident about these.

>> No.6016528
File: 107 KB, 500x500, Robertopiqueras.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016528

>>6016504
Mixed those posts up, oh well

>> No.6016546

>>6016448

I can't wait for this bullshit Givenchy-wannabe print phase to be over.

Protip: if Yeezy's your inspiration (which he clearly is), go back to Hypebeast.

>> No.6016551

>>6016528
I don't understand, are you defending the topman kicks? they really are awful, regardless of the colors.

>> No.6016560

>>6016528
>>6016504
>>6016428
I really don't get this stuff. Why is this gaudy ugly stuff /fa/? Is it ironic or have some 2deep4me meaning? I just don't see the appeal at all.

>> No.6016561

>>6016551
>what are different tastes
2deep4u

>> No.6016580

>>6016560
rappers made givenchy's loud prints popular, nobody can afford givenchy so instead they buy shitty knockoffs by brands that realize they have a market in people looking for loud tshirts

>> No.6016601
File: 167 KB, 1500x551, which1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016601

which should i cop

>> No.6016604
File: 843 KB, 1024x683, webgroup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016604

>>6016560
muh internet culture

>Why are a lot of aesthetics right now are so intensely bright and colorful? Is everyone trying to outdo each other?
>I remember in 2007 when I moved to Madrid, and MIA was having her moment, and all of her clothes were like rave colors, so that became very trendy. There used to be more of these tribes like “gothic” that made some people label tumblr style “seapunk”, but I’m not into these names. The good thing about our generation is that we can do whatever we want every day; we don’t have the pressure to live in these tribes.

>Is there a concern that our visual culture of senseless mish-mashing is empty?
>Even if it’s empty, I think it’s relevant to part of what’s going on in society. I remember this quote of Anna Wintour saying, “In the moment of crisis everyone wants to have fun. I think when we are at a bad point for society economically and socially, that’s when people embrace fantasy and are looking to escape from their reality. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the global financial crisis coincided with the rise of Lady Gaga in 2007 and 2008. You might know bad things are happening outside, but in your bedroom you want to have fun. So who cares if I’m mixing punk with cyber or whatever. My first collection commercially was in 2009 when I was still living in Barcelona, but it is only in the last year and a half that I have been able to work 100% for myself as a designer. So I’m now living my dream, and I want to give a little bit of hope to all the other people that are trying to do this.

>> No.6016609

>>6016561
>subjective opinions hurr durr

>> No.6016628

>>6016601
Black and w2c bruh

>> No.6016634
File: 48 KB, 600x710, aphrodite_usb_hub_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016634

>>6016604
also I think it's a general taste in 90s culture, taking (often a little ironic) inspiration from the clothes, marketing and internet 1.0
My little pony, anime/hentai. Jessica Ciocci has been doing it for a long time but I don't think she's much of a fashion icon.

>> No.6016654

>>6016347

Not TERRIBLE for a poor man's Raf, I guess. Not great, but not terrible.

>> No.6016670
File: 514 KB, 1500x1784, better.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016670

>>6016628

i'm leaning to it i'm just torn. also better crop for you/others mo opinions pls

>> No.6016675

>>6016670

i cut off the top this time brb kill self

>> No.6016692

>>6016670
Just tell me w2c

>> No.6016699

>>6016692

frye company brown is chambers high vintage
black is greene tall lace

>> No.6016713
File: 229 KB, 536x750, The painting that saved culture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016713

>>6016634
Internet is definitely a part of it. Something a lot of contemporary artists are dealing with and this transfer to the digital, or trying to humanize the digital or appropriation of it. It's very prominent in fashion and graphic design, and making graphics is accessible to everyone now, design is sort of decentralized. People are sort of bored with the conventional

>> No.6016734
File: 66 KB, 630x420, Vans-Era-59-CL-01-630x420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016734

>> No.6016736

>>6016429
ok shorts, ugly top, bad model.

>> No.6016881
File: 344 KB, 339x506, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016881

I need a pair of low-tops that can match with this.
Help?

>> No.6016899

>>6016736
they're connected

>> No.6016951
File: 17 KB, 317x475, shoe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6016951

I really liked the silhouette when I was wearing in store. Just want an opinion from the fuccboi gang.

>> No.6016963

>>6016899
Oh fuck then none of the above. Shit's awful.

>> No.6016974

>>6016951

It's SUPER specific. If you have the wardrobe for it, I imagine it'd be an incredibly sleek and simple, but very high-impact shoe. The Red Wing Postman series is similar, but if you're aiming specifically to not have laces, I literally can't imagine another alternative.

>> No.6016977

>>6016951

what brand

they mitelookcheap imo

>> No.6016983

>>6016977

Google Image Search result yields an answer in 0.28 seconds.

>> No.6016997

>>6016983

our legacy is a good buy

>> No.6017002

>>6016977
ourlegacy...

>>6016974
I own a couple generation shirts and would likely wear the shoes with my acne wallstreet slackzz as well. our legacy puts out some great shirting if you know a good tailor.

>> No.6017051

>>6016951
I always thought big soles were weird coming out a centimeter to the front

Maybe I just have weird taste

>> No.6017080
File: 255 KB, 1600x1062, $T2eC16N,!)sE9swmYlSbBR,fGqzGv!~~60_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6017080

http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-AO-American-Optical-Safety-Sunglasses-U-PICK-COLOR-SIZE-Frames-Eyeglasses-/111028686585?pt=US_Sunglasses&var=&hash=item19d9d34ef9

>> No.6017103
File: 78 KB, 455x555, 62_076052[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6017103

linen shorts?

>> No.6017106
File: 157 KB, 1160x1865, jacket.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6017106

>>6017080
nahhhhh unless extremely good price. under 50 USD.

okay /fa/ im copping the our legacy shoes how about this jacket?

>> No.6017127

>>6017106

Blah. Carven quality doesn't justify full price purchases ever.

>> No.6017131

>>6017080
>thinking bout it
>shipping is even more than the glasses itself
Eh

>> No.6017143
File: 209 KB, 1600x1200, $(KGrHqZ,!lYFEs6wfe85BROQpB5-9Q~~60_57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6017143

ya they're $35 and customizable. thinking about getting it with brown frame.

>> No.6017165

>>6017143
look kinda cheap to me

>> No.6017173

>>6017103

Fuck no

I'm 99% sure that picture of a faggot ass hipster with the shitty lion tattoo on his chest and smoking is wearing that exact one

>> No.6017211

>>6017173
what about solid colors

>> No.6017224

>>6017103
I think these look pretty dope dude. Not sure about pulling them off in an outfit, but I like them as a piece.

>> No.6017311 [DELETED] 
File: 283 KB, 1200x1200, P_022942362FM[1].jpg_135999.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6017311

Got it as a gift

Should I just take it back?

>> No.6017314 [DELETED] 

>>6017311
Also the color is nowhere near that bright

It's much saturated and way less flashy

>> No.6017359
File: 75 KB, 1000x1500, rns-sck-blk-(1)[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6017359

I need a bag for gym clothes and camping trips.

>> No.6017434

>>6017359
That's going to be one of those times where functionality > effay

>> No.6018145
File: 10 KB, 290x370, cop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6018145

should i /fa/?

>> No.6018162

>>6018145
no quality is horrid

>> No.6018166

>>6018162
are they that bad?

>> No.6018187

>>6018166
yea. they will last you 3 months. smells really bad, and feels cheap too. it's acceptable if you are buying just for a trip, festival or w/e

>> No.6018205

>>6018187
I ride a bike a lot, they'd probably just be my riding and beater shoes, thought they looked nice too ;_;

>> No.6018903

>>6016244
Yeah
What are you planning on wearing withit?