[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 48 KB, 392x293, 1366505799027.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6006228 No.6006228 [Reply] [Original]

Flyknits vs. Roshes

Let this thread settle it once and for all.

Results will be screencapped and posted whenever a fuccboi from the losing team tries to step up.

>> No.6006229

flyknits

>> No.6006234

>>6006228
I like both but I like rpshes more

>> No.6006241

Why would you buy runner shoes? I doubt you're training. If you are, get free runs anyway.

>> No.6006249

Current score

Knits: 1
Roshes: 1

>> No.6006247

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stuHt7ZRYrQ

>> No.6006256

whatever the individual person wants to wear you fucking turboautist

only the socially retarded sit around trying to turn everything on this board into a competition because it nourishes their fragile damage egos trying to get people to admit that one subjective aesthetic is objectively better than another

>> No.6006268

>>6006256
shut up

>> No.6006301
File: 46 KB, 569x571, 1287330015153.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6006301

Roshes. Hands down.

I swear if I see those ugly flyknits one more time..

>> No.6006303

Both shoes are ugly as fuck.

>> No.6006322

I like Roshes better.

But they're both shit anyways unless you're RUNNING IN THEM

>> No.6006328

Current score

Knits: 1
Roshes: 3

>> No.6006331

>>6006322
roshes aren't runnng shoes

>> No.6006337

>>6006331
Neither are flyknits. Who wants to run in those ugly shits?

>> No.6006339

>>6006322
>(You)

Roshes.

>> No.6006345
File: 61 KB, 600x399, Nike-Free-Inneva-Woven-NSW-NRG-New-Images-1-600x399.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6006345

innevas

>> No.6006346

FLYKNITS ALL DAY LIL NIGGAS.

TAKE YOUR POORFAG ROSHES AND FUCK OFF BACK TO MFA.

>> No.6006354

>>6006337
flyknits are though

>> No.6006362
File: 37 KB, 510x510, freetrails.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6006362

>> No.6006365
File: 143 KB, 348x326, 1363476220845.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6006365

>>6006346
>flyknits literally only cost like 50 dollars more
>everybody, even fucking teenagers can afford them saving up for a day or two
>not to mention they're ugly as fuck
Keep trying to justify your purchase, mad bag. You'll never get that money back.

Keep trying to use it as a false "patrician" flag.

>> No.6006376
File: 412 KB, 480x315, vomit.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6006376

>>6006362

>> No.6006394

>>6006346
Roshes are ugleh
Flyknits are ugleh

Fuck. Invest in some real footwear.

>> No.6006396
File: 84 KB, 450x338, reebokpumpfury.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6006396

>>6006394
uglier a trainer is the better

>> No.6006529

knitties

>> No.6006638

>>6006394
>invest
this term is on par with fuccbois and #rekts. you don't 'invest' in clothing - unless you buy a rare designer piece whose value is expected to increase

also, not a big fan of either but they're pretty cool and i like them much better than GATs or astroboots for example

>> No.6006640

Flyknit because they use the new new flyknit technology (named after), zoom, lunar and flywire technology

Roshes just have a new sole material, later on they'll get flywire, bit that's pointless in the roshe design

>> No.6006884

>>6006638
gats are the worst bullshit trend on here atm

>> No.6006894

>>6006884
>gats
>trend
I didn't know trends last for years and are timeless. Weird!

>> No.6006900

>>6006894
that same logic applies to fedoras you peasant.

where's your timeless fedora?

>> No.6006901

>>6006884
oh come on

>> No.6006909

>>6006894
>economy material cheaply made army issue sneakers
>timeless

i don't think you know what "timeless" really means.

>> No.6006922
File: 82 KB, 700x630, richolsens.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6006922

the only timeless sneakers are ricky dicky dunks.

>> No.6006940

>>6006922

>timeless
>posts hideous moonboots

Pick one

>> No.6006982

>Wearing Nike
>/fa/

Pick one fuccbois.

>> No.6007004
File: 106 KB, 500x277, raf-simons-adidas-3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6007004

Simon Raffy

>> No.6007009

>>6006940
that's the joke

>> No.6007023

All I know is that Roshe Runs have that awful, rotund sole especially towards the heel. Makes it look like one of those old people pediatric shoes.

Free Run looks much better.

>> No.6007035

>>6006940
holy shit how fucking dense are you

>> No.6007044

Remember when CP&co were the only acceptable sneakers? Remember when pretty much month or two ago NB's were the only acceptable sneakers? I wonder what we will have next month when you fagets get tired of these Nike runners.

>> No.6007043

>>6006909
>sneakers that are iconic for Germany army
>can't be described as "timeless"
I don't think you're as educated as you think you are.

They aren't going anywhere, kiddo. Go back to wearing your flyknits.

>> No.6007048
File: 55 KB, 250x250, 1347403897427.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6007048

>>6007044
>Remember when pretty much month or two ago NB's were the only acceptable sneakers?
Funny, I don't remember that at all.

>> No.6007051

Free Run 2s >

>> No.6007059

>>6007048
Then you didn't lurk enough

>> No.6007064

how is this even a debate

lets settle this how this should really be settled?

IF ANY FAGGOT THINKS THAT ROSHES ARE BETTER THAN FLYKNITS, post a fit and then i will post a fit and we will let /fa/ decide

>> No.6007069

>>6007064
ohhh shit SOMEONE LINK TO THE YOUTUBE VIDEO FOR THE FIT BATTLE SONG.

I CAN'T DO IT FROM MY PHONE

>> No.6007114

>Wearing running shoes casually.
STOP

>> No.6007121

>>6007114
do u wear them formally

>> No.6007141

>>6007121
Why wear them at all?

>> No.6007151

>>6007141

because people like them?

honestly i dont understand what goes through your head dude when you post, do you think, what the hell?

>> No.6007171

>>6007141
if you need to run
although i can understand why a fat neckbeard such as yourself would not see them as being very useful

>> No.6007176

>>6007151
They're very un-/fa/.

>> No.6007170

>>6007121
>>6007141
>>6007151
I usually wear them for their intended purpose.

You know, running?

>> No.6007181

>>6007170

Cool. I wear them because I am following trends (fashion). Hopefully this doesn't make me a follower in your eyes because you know I want your approval of what I do so badly.

Please approve of me, overload of fashion.

you stupid piece of shit, people like you don't deserve to live go fucking die.

>> No.6007184

They both look like shit.

>> No.6007191

>>6007176

Well actually. I am interesting in the street wear aesthetic. Running shoes in a fit is a trend, this makes it fashionable.

fash·ion
/ˈfaSHən/
Noun
A popular trend, esp. in styles of dress, ornament, or behavior.

But hey, if you still think they are un /fa/, why don't you post a fit and show me what is fashionable, i could use a few tips.

>> No.6007251
File: 9 KB, 407x395, 1328107097456.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6007251

>>6007059
I've been here for a year and I browse /fa/ for 10-14 hours daily.

Nice try though.

>> No.6007430

roshes

>> No.6008145

>>6007251
confirmed for /fa/
ur team wins

>> No.6008155

>>6006228
asos got roshes just now
FLYKNITS WINN WOO

>> No.6008621

Flyknits were designed to be part of nikes performance line

Roshes were designed to be $70

Then roshe fuccbois call themselves tech/streetninja to feel relevant

>> No.6008861
File: 16 KB, 252x159, 1283227731061.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6008861

This is a stupid question
Roshes are a cheaper shoe in price and construction
they are not designed for real running in mind
the only colorways that look good are black/black and sometimes iguana woven
fks on the other hand use a new (albeit unimpressive) method of construction
they are light shoes that are actually used for running
the colorways that look the best are the black/grey and white/black trainers
in terms of which looks better, comparing the best colorways of each the fks win
in terms of actually running, the fks win
now stop trying to rile everyone up

>> No.6009193

>>6008861
gg

>> No.6009720

why do you people all insist that the entirety of this board can only wear one shoe

jesus christ you people are autistic

>> No.6009736

>>6009720
We only wear flyknits and geobaskets around here

>> No.6010120

>>6009736
& cps

>> No.6010337

ITT: fuccbois general

>> No.6010350

Roshes

>> No.6010360

>>6010350

>being a fuccboi.
>2013

flyknits > Roshes

>> No.6010369
File: 69 KB, 231x130, orly.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6010369

>>6010360
>Flyknits
>Better than Roshes

>> No.6010397

>>6010360
>hurhur why doesnt everyone wear the same thing as me

>> No.6010523

since when did running shoes become fashionable? or are you talking about actually using them for running? unless you're in middle school you really dont want to use running shoes tbh

>> No.6010551

roshes are made for the express purpose of being for poor people
being poor isn't /fa/

flyknits suck but roshes suck worse

>> No.6010645

>>6007176
highly doubt you've any taste, fuccboi

>> No.6011361

>>6007181
>wearing a running shoe for running
>wearing a shoe for it's intended purpose
yea, what an idiot that guy is.

>> No.6011414

roshes

>> No.6011431

roshes

>> No.6011901

>>6008621
>if it costs more it looks better
This is what trust fund babies actually believe.

>> No.6012110

>>6006354
The flyknit racer, and spike are running shoes. The trainers, the ones with the flat soles, and available in a ton of colourways is a TRAINER, ie a gym shoe.