[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 44 KB, 450x450, prada+cup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950164 No.5950164 [Reply] [Original]

Prada is by far the shittiest fashion house there is. Seriously, look at this garbage. Unbelievable...

>> No.5950177

>>5950164
prada are aight

not nearly as bad as louis v or gucci

>> No.5950175

>>5950164
It seems like the only people that buy their stuff are the rich arab immigrants

>> No.5950195
File: 219 KB, 1024x683, pradacreepers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950195

sure OP

>> No.5950203
File: 189 KB, 872x583, prada.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950203

ur right m8

>> No.5950212
File: 58 KB, 500x332, 1365633511189.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950212

>>5950164
niggas love those ugly ass things.

I actually do want these though

>> No.5950230
File: 9 KB, 212x60, Untitled1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950230

>>5950195
>>5950203
>>5950212
>they have one good item
lmao
prada is gay af nerds

>> No.5950250

>>5950177
Prada has produced a lot of shit for a long time.
But yes, Louis Vuitton is worse in every measurable way.

>> No.5950271

>>5950230
>repetng sme img in 24hors

lololllolol nis retrt sht cun'

>> No.5950273
File: 232 KB, 683x1024, pradass13(1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950273

prada is dope f u nerds

>> No.5950289
File: 32 KB, 376x490, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950289

>>5950230
shush belgian
>pic related, it's u

>> No.5950304
File: 59 KB, 1168x780, 1355902863208.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950304

yall niggas jokin

>> No.5950318

>>5950273

whats so good about that

>> No.5950414
File: 1.13 MB, 924x1080, prada-mens-Fall-2012-runway.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950414

I liked this show

>> No.5950993
File: 42 KB, 338x555, AW13C-Prada-056_2489104a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5950993

Okay

>> No.5951006

>>5950414
That was a fuckin awesome collection, made me wanna get all coated up... shame i live in Sydney

>> No.5951009

Not even mainline prada

>> No.5951026

>>5950164

Are you kidding me? Those shoes sell like discount crack season after season. I have 3 pairs myself, but the matte leather.

>>5950177
>>5950250

It's commercial luxury dude, just because you can't afford it doesn't make it shit. And a house like LV and Prada doesn't just make one thing. The ready to wear lines for both are very exclusive and high quality. Get that pleb dick out of your eye.

>> No.5951147

>>5950164

You're confusing Prada Linea Rosso with Prada.

>> No.5951212

>>5950195
>>5950203
>>5950212

these all look like chit

>> No.5951221

>>5951026

>just because you can't afford it doesn't make it shit

no one here said that. affordable or not, it looks like shit

>> No.5951238

>>5951221
opinions gaylord give up

>> No.5951255

if the tag didn't say prada most of you sheep wouldn't even be able to differentiate these from a pair of walmart sneakers

>> No.5951298

>>5950177
Gucci has *some* very cool pieces, although overall they are probably worse than Prada (which I like a lot, by the way).

Louis Vuitton, however, are probably the shittiest fashion. The only good thing that comes from them are their shoes/boots, the rest is totally hideous, and that ugly cheap ass logo plastered all over their products doesn't make it any better.

>> No.5951351
File: 62 KB, 500x500, try me nigger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5951351

>>5951212
>Dissin prada creepers
The fuk is this.?

>> No.5951498

>>5951255

Except for the use of leather, the silhouette, the closures, and the construction of the upper. Yes, other than those details, there is no way to distinguish these sneakers from other sneakers.

>> No.5951506
File: 53 KB, 480x320, 0119otrshine-blog480.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5951506

>>5951298

Once again, you're only looking at the branded goods. What is your opinion of the seasonal collection pieces?

>> No.5951667

>>5950195
Saw these in brown at Nordstrom rack for $250, considered copping them and having them resoled. That shit is so stiff it's almost unwalkable.

>> No.5953145

>>5951498

>the use of leather, the silhouette, the closures, and the construction of the upper

hahahahahaha

you guys are pathetic, seriously, you would defend an actual piece of shit, a turd, if it had the brand tag...

"guys look at the construction of this actual piece of shit, the material, the design, the silhouette, the corn pattern... this isn't just some ordinary piece of shit!! let me get my wallet!!!"

>> No.5953153

>>5951298

>mfw i wear my 100% cashmere gucci joggers

>mfw no branding apart from green & red stripe on the inside

>> No.5953156

>>5950177
thats why its gucci gucci louis louis fendi fendi prada

prada only 1nce

kekeke

>> No.5953160

>>5953145

I'm not saying that I like the shoe, but your point is vastly off the mark if you think that there isn't a recognizable point of view in the design of the sneaker that differentiates it from other sneakers.

>> No.5953184

>>5953145
christ youre retarded, no ones saying it looks good, were saying prada and wal mart use noticeably different materials and construction