/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.18128515]

Name a single brand of actual adult clothes, as in they make shit worn by people with 800+ credit scores, that has the "timeless" zoomer shit in their catalog. Pants with a 16 inch front rise. Zero drop like a pair of hipster running shoes. Pads hanging 3" off the ends of each shoulder. Button stance just below the adams apple. Bottom of the jacket extending another 6 inches past the outstretched fingertips.

No? Yeah, thought so. You've been brainwashed by AI slop.

[Anonymous No.18128523]

schizo fag thread

[Anonymous No.18129276]

bump

[Anonymous No.18129277]

Absolutely obsessed fucking retard

[Anonymous No.18129448]

>>18128515
What's wrong with a 16 inch rise, boy?
Most of my pants have that

[Anonymous No.18129456]

>>18129448
post clown fit

[Anonymous No.18129468]

>>18129456
I ain't no clown, boy.
My torso is abnormally long and high waisted style fits me better

[Anonymous No.18129470]

>>18129468
lmao not even OP but this is trash

[Anonymous No.18129478]

>>18128515
Who are you talking to?

[Anonymous No.18129482]

>>18129470
Those are just the pants I wear at home when gardening, don't want my good ones to get ruined
Picrel is me after a party

[Anonymous No.18129502]

>>18129468
>Airbender core
Nice

[Anonymous No.18130512]

bump

[Bohdan of Estonia No.18130514]

>>18130512
Harem Bump

[Anonymous No.18131363]

>>18128515
Nothing wrong with 16 inch rise
Some of us aren't manlets

[Anonymous No.18131545]

>>18131363
if that's a 16 inch rise then that guy has got to be about 8 and 1/2 feet tall

[Bohdan of Estonia No.18131699]

>>18131545
My boy, it can't be helped if you squat a decent amount of weight, my ass rivals most women.
I need a larger size so they don't rip when I'm at the gym and larger sizes typically have longer rises.
Can't go to a tailor because all of them were lynched last year

[Anonymous No.18131706]

>>18131699
I know you're shitposting but you really set off my 'tism, for future shitposting accuracy please understand that by convention, "rise" if otherwise unspecified means front rise.

[Bohdan of Estonia No.18131721]

>>18131706
That is correct, an XXL will have a longer rise than a L, because the manufacturers are lazy.
Don't trust when they say total length minus the inseam = rise
Because I bought a pair that said Inseam: 28"
Length: 41" and even sent a message to confirm, they said it would=13 inch rise, but it was 16 when I measured it myself
I will wear them regardless because I will not spend €15 to ship them back.

[Anonymous No.18131738]

>>18131721
Is this the new tripname for that schizophrenic sissy boomer adult bookstore guy?

[Sanjay of Babylon No.18131744]

>>18131738
No that would be sanjay

[Anonymous No.18131750]

>>18131738
His name is Bohdan and he is from Estonia

[Anonymous No.18131891]

>>18128515
>>18131545
Are you going to tell the GOAT that he can't wear what he wants?

[Anonymous No.18131893]

crazy idea that different clothes fit on different body types

[Anonymous No.18132391]

Interesting how the only cope coping shills can come up with is costume pants from cave man television dramas, and the jacket is completely ignored

[Anonymous No.18132418]

>>18132391
You will now face my true power.
The one demographic you can not criticize, A BLACK MAN

[Anonymous No.18132421]

>>18132391
>>18131893

Nigerian, that is Taras Bulba

[Anonymous No.18132423]

>>18132391

[Anonymous No.18132424]

>>18132391
>>18132391

[Anonymous No.18132427]

[Anonymous No.18132429]

>>18132418
>>18132421
>>18132423
>>18132424
>>18132427
>>18131891
>>18131744
>>18131699
>>18130514
>>18129482
>>18129468
>>18129448

YJK

[Anonymous No.18132530]

>>18132429
Apologize now, else I set upon you my massive genitalia

[Anonymous No.18132551]

>it's still nothing but pants

[Anonymous No.18132564]

>>18132551
Yes, because no one wears jacket suits but most wear pants

[Anonymous No.18132567]

>>18132551
Shouldn't have denigrated the comfy 16 inch rises, lad.

[Anonymous No.18132569]

>>18131699
>I need a larger size so they don't rip when I'm at the gym and larger sizes typically have longer rises.
low front rise high rear rise jeans exist, its just extremely uncommon, picrel.
these fuckers are actually very comfortable the problem is being low rise they look like shit with your shirt tucked.

[Anonymous No.18132605]

>>18132569
The fuck are you on about, boy?

[Anonymous No.18132617]

>>18132569
Tucked in shirt looks good

[Anonymous No.18132627]

>>18132605
english second language?
>low front rise high rear rise pants exist
>but they look bad with a tucked shirt

[Anonymous No.18132629]

>>18132627
TUCKED IN SHIRT LOOKS GOOD!

[Anonymous No.18132641]

>>18132569
High rise looks better but only up to a point

[Anonymous No.18132642]

>>18132569

[Anonymous No.18132664]

>>18132642
Literally the only attempt in this thread, and it's a skinny suit with low rise pants

[Anonymous No.18132674]

>>18132664
not that anon but are you retarded?
that's at least a 13 inch rise
most brands consider an 11 inch or even less high rise.

[Anonymous No.18132675]

>>18132629
not with low rise

[Anonymous No.18132699]

>>18132664
That's literally a high rise

[Anonymous No.18132700]

They only work if you are somewhat good looking to begin with

[Anonymous No.18132703]

>>18132700
As you can see this "man" wouldn't look good in anything but baggy clothing

[Anonymous No.18133002]

>>18132703
>clothes being worn
>clothes being worn by attractive person

[Anonymous No.18133005]

>>18133002
Yes sir

[Anonymous No.18133016]

>>18128515
>800+ credit scores
Pointless, real creditheads know that you're wasting churning opportunities past 750 (780 in some rare cases)

[Anonymous No.18133125]

>>18133016
my dad has been churning cc's as a pastime since he was 18 and for the last 20 or so years his good goy score has never fallen before 800. I think after your credit age reaches a certain age the kikes let you be,

[Anonymous No.18133636]

>>18132641
Are you fucking high?
Low rise looks better on all bodies

[Anonymous No.18133821]

High rise is best in life

[Anonymous No.18134554]

>>18133821
NO, it is to crush your enemies (women). Little known fun fact, that is what he meant. "To crush your enemies (women), see then driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of (your enemies) the women"

[Anonymous No.18134801]

>>18133821
Um, yikes.
Arnold Indiviualofafricandescent is gross

[Anonymous No.18135568]

>>18134801
Go back

[Anonymous No.18135753]

>>18133125
I think you need a good mix of account types, that counts for more than a hard pull every 2 years. I've never had a late payment but I can never get past 810 because I don't have a car loan, just a mortgage, 2 credit cards, and 1 student loan

[Anonymous No.18135754]

>>18128515
Ur mum gave me a 16 inch front rise last night m8

[Anonymous No.18135755]

>>18135754
Me Mum would never

[Anonymous No.18135820]

>>18128515
>brand of actual adult clothes, as in they make shit worn by people with 800+ credit scores
retard. They buy bespoke. Actual richfags have custom tailored clothing.

[Anonymous No.18135823]

>>18133002
>>18132700
>pink on purple sweater with zero texture or drape
>fugly wash denim with no drape and hugs his waist
>gay stance
youre hopeless Anon.

[Anonymous No.18135824]

>>18135820
actual richfags wear costco jeans, daily drive a base spec toyota f150 or tesla and have a garage full of ferraris, an rv, a yacht, etc.

[Anonymous No.18135826]

>>18135824
we're talking about richfags into fashion, those guys will buy bespoke. Celebrities, politicians, and other richfags almost never dress well

[Anonymous No.18136224]

>>18135824

[Anonymous No.18136568]

>>18136224
2700 for casual pants?

[Anonymous No.18136581]

>>18136568
poor hands typed this

[Anonymous No.18136582]

>>18136581
2700 for casual pants?

[Anonymous No.18136589]

>>18128515
Tommy bahama

[Anonymous No.18136634]

>>18136582
poor hands typed this

[Anonymous No.18136638]

>>18136224
no they literally wear the kirkland signature jeans. they say kirkland on them.
right is how i dress.
i know the difference.

>>18135826
that's usually their kids unless their job/career is something public facing like the frontman of a band or something.

[Anonymous No.18136642]

>>18136224
no they literally wear the kirkland signature jeans. they say kirkland on them.
right is how i dress.
i know the difference. houses are like 20-50m where i grew up.

>>18135826
that's usually their kids unless their job/career is something public facing like the frontman of a band or something.

[Anonymous No.18136705]

>>18136642
people notice the ones who wear walmart clothes because they think it's a moral lesson from bible school, and because it fits the narrative. there are plenty of rich people who wear opulent and tasteful clothes, just maybe not in your area of texas oil country

[Anonymous No.18136749]

>>18136705
tech & aerospace

[Anonymous No.18136753]

nah its mostly upper middle class people dressing opulently. uber rich gays do though. there's a lot of them out there.
i do home remodels on mostly homes in that range and when i was younger i staged houses for my cousin who's a high high end realtor. these dudes will have nobel prizes on the wall, a helicopter pad, seaplane & shipyard in their houses (not an exaggeration) then wear kirkland signature walmart pants. they're unassuming as shit. look like any old boomer.

[Anonymous No.18136782]

>>18136753
maybe the gay thing explains it, the majority of the very rich people I have hung out with are gays and they don't mind looking good, like, at all. so when I hear redditors going off about how rich people dress like shit, to me it sounds like rightoid propaganda.

but I did know a very rich family through a friend and they weren't the gays I know best, and I'm sorry to tell you this but they also don't dress like dogshit like in the reddit memes. they dress like normal upper middle class people, they'd blend in at a party with stanford faculty, not at a tractor pull with a bunch of inbred yokels.

the idea of wealthy people wearing walmart shit just sounds like a cope story made up to push an agenda.

[Anonymous No.18136794]

>>18132700
probably the worst fit i've ever seen on this site, ever

[Anonymous No.18137619]

>>18136794
I've seen worse

[Anonymous No.18137725]

>>18137619
Bet

[Anonymous No.18137938]

>>18137725
that looks bad because he's fat, you're cheating

[Anonymous No.18138943]

Bampu

[Anonymous No.18140372]

..

[Anonymous No.18140384]

>>18128515
>brand
huh? just wear what looks good.
>adult clothes
consoomer manchild cope. ISHYGDDT

[Anonymous No.18141047]

>>18128515
>pic

[Anonymous No.18141482]

>>18141047
where2cop

[Anonymous No.18141511]

>>18136753
>>18136782
rich WASPs love land's end

[Anonymous No.18141752]

>>18137938
>>18137725
hahahah fuck me
imagine having a waist size bigger than your inseam but then also thinking its a good idea to wear pants that make your hips look even wider haha fuck me. and then you add in one 45 degree looking motherfucker of a taper to those pants to emphasize it even more and make the rest of your body look even smaller in proportion.
you have to dress to your body type. i used to be morbidly obese with an apple body shape like picrel. there's no excuse for this shit. classic example of a fashion trend victim. "wide pants are in!"

[Anonymous No.18141762]

>>18132700
obvious trolling with the sweater fit but this pic does a good job of demonstrating something:
high rise pants with belt loops especially jeans look w e i r d when tucked without a belt.
it looks fine with a mid or low rise worn off the hips but when you're wearing jeans at your true waist near your navel you need the visual separation to exist for proportion to be right.
not shitting on the trend i have sworn by high rise since i bought my first jap jeans in 2005.

[Anonymous No.18141794]

>>18141752
Wide pants are not in, dumbass

[Anonymous No.18142386]

>>18141752
what does this image even mean

[Anonymous No.18142450]

Phillip Plein duh

[Anonymous No.18143670]

No such thing