/wt/ watch thread

[Anonymous No.17686294]

Archie remains king edition

> Poorfag guide: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

Previous thread >>17684650

[Anonymous No.17686296]

>>17686294
Anything that is not casio can be thrown away.

[Anonymous No.17686310]

First for undisputed Omega supremacy.

[Anonymous No.17686311]

>>17686296
The S in Casio stands for _______.

[Anonymous No.17686314]

>>17686311
Sexual

[Anonymous No.17686326]

>>17686314
Thx for giving me the answer.

[Anonymous No.17686332]

The new omegas look cool to me desu.

[Anonymous No.17686356]

New daily beater for summer stuff.

[Anonymous No.17686357]

>>17686310
Nigger even Omegafags are shitting on Omega lmao

[Anonymous No.17686359]

>>17686357

[Anonymous No.17686360]

>>17686357
>French fag
Opinion discarded.

[Anonymous No.17686361]

>>17686359
IT NEVER STOPS

[Anonymous No.17686370]

>>17686357
>>17686359
>>17686361

Serious fucking question.
WHY IS DAY OF THE WEEK SO UNPOPULAR?

It's almost like only Seiko and Orient make day of the week watches, what the fuck?

[Anonymous No.17686381]

Asking again:

I'm looking for a watch with a dark green/brown/tan case and dial color. Chronograph or not but with a simple tool watch design.

40mm MAYBE 42mm size maximum but prefer less
<=300€
Mechanical or Quartz I don't care as long as the movement isn't total garbage.

Should be from an okay company and not a fashion or rando brand´with questionable quality.

So far the best thing I found was a brown Hamilton Khaki Field but the ~600€ for it seem too much for what it is.

[Anonymous No.17686382]

>>17686381
du du du da da da

[Anonymous No.17686384]

>>17686381
Get the Hamilton, it's fine.

[Anonymous No.17686385]

>>17686381
Got the perfect watch for you senpai.

[Anonymous No.17686386]

citizen NB1050-59H

Is this it bros?

Is this /our/ watch?

[Anonymous No.17686387]

>>17686310

[Anonymous No.17686390]

>>17686386
Citizen, more like Shitizen lmao.

[Anonymous No.17686393]

>>17686386
UTTERLY LACKING IN SOVL

[Anonymous No.17686399]

>>17686381
>I'm looking for a watch with a dark green/brown/tan case and dial color. Chronograph or not but with a simple tool watch design.
>I don't care as long as the movement isn't total garbage.
>an okay company and not a fashion or rando brand´
>~600€ for it seem too much for what it is

You're looking for a Japanese watch.

[Anonymous No.17686401]

>>17686370
When do you not know what day of the week it is? Get your shit together

[Anonymous No.17686404]

>>17686384
600€ for a simple field watch sounds a bit much

surely with the 1000 watch companies that exist and the 1000 different watches each company makes there should be a watch that fulfils the criteria?
after all I'm not asking for some ridiculous colors or designs
yeah my budget is low but again I'm not asking for a chronograph specifically and am even willing to settle for quartz

[Anonymous No.17686405]

>>17686399
>anon is looking for a green/brown/tan watch
>"DURRRRR YOU SHOULD BUY THIS BLACK WATCH, ALSO IT'S FROM JAPAN"

[Anonymous No.17686406]

>>17686386
I hate the oyster cases, HATE THE OYSTER CASES MAKE SMALLER LUGS YOU JAPANESE FUCKS

Who are they even making the watches for? The japanese are asians, not giants, why do they keep making gigantic cases?

Just rip off a fucking tissot already, how hard is that?

[Anonymous No.17686407]

>>17686381

[Anonymous No.17686408]

>>17686381

[Anonymous No.17686409]

>>17686359
The SMP bracelet is so unpopular with watch nerds that I’m starting to like it.

[Anonymous No.17686410]

>>17686405
Yeah, i'm stupid, i thought he was looking for a DARK CASE.
Sorry ok?

>>17686401
because i work in shifts, one day on three days off. I can be working on sunday, saturday, holiday, my chedule isn't tied to the days of the week.

[Anonymous No.17686412]

>>17686381
Marathon general purpose quartz is the one you want.

[Anonymous No.17686413]

>>17686407
>chinese movements
>made in china
>ran by the round faced slow butthurt belters
Yikes, that's an actual shitter.

[Anonymous No.17686414]

>>17686412
>Marathon general purpose

A 20$ watch sold for 400$ because muh tritium.
You're just getting fucked m8.

[Anonymous No.17686416]

>>17686413
Of course it's a shitter. It's 750€.
Watches start at 5000€

[Anonymous No.17686418]

>>17686407
>gold case
>>17686408
>silver case

>>17686412
I wish the dial was brown too but I will keep this suggestion in mind thanks

[Anonymous No.17686420]

>>17686418
>>gold case
It's bronze.
>>silver case
It's steel.

[Anonymous No.17686424]

>>17686416
>Watches start at 5000€
Sucking the swiss cock does.

[Anonymous No.17686431]

>>17686386
>male endlinks
Tell me you love cock without telling me you love cock.

[Anonymous No.17686434]

>>17686424
>>17686431
Your gay thoughts are disgusting.
Seek help.

[Anonymous No.17686435]

>>17686356
Nice.

[Anonymous No.17686437]

>>17686381
If all else fails, look through Timex's Expedition and Camper lines.

[Anonymous No.17686443]

>>17686406
>Who are they even making the watches for? The japanese are asians, not giants, why do they keep making gigantic cases?
Asians embraced the big watch meme over the past 15 years more than any other region. Panerai was king. It was an absolute joke.
Even though panerai is dead, its dinnerplate shadow lives on.
Time will tell whether or not the asians with their tiny, hairless wrists will bend to the fashions that are re-normalizing by the West. The large Jap companies, run by conservative boomers with little imagination, will not be so quick to abandon the large watch trend as in their eyes they've basically only just started doing it.

[Anonymous No.17686450]

>>17686437
thanks
It's not perfect but the green/orange contrast is nice

[Anonymous No.17686452]

>>17686450
also found this one which is cool but can't find it sold anywhere anymore

[Anonymous No.17686455]

>>17686450
meh orange

[Anonymous No.17686459]

>>17686385
I'm just so sad they cheapened out
if they made it actually well built with a decent quartz movement I would buy it for 600€

[Anonymous No.17686467]

>>17686410
Even if I was a neet I'd know what day of the week it is

[Anonymous No.17686472]

>>17686467
>Even if I was a neet I'd know what day of the week it is

When I was a neet I had no idea what month it was.

[Anonymous No.17686480]

Finally looking to get a nicer watch that will more or less serve as a one watch collection. I've got roughly 6.5in wrists, so a modern sub or GMT master are out. Datejust 36, Explorer 36, or Blackbay 54? Open to other suggestions as well.

[Anonymous No.17686486]

>>17686356
It's titanium made?

[Anonymous No.17686487]

>>17686459
Give me a QRD on what's wrong with these.
I saw a pic a few threads ago about how a blue/purple one was staining some fag's arm.

[Anonymous No.17686491]

>>17686480
If you dress more casually I’d go Explorer, if you dress in office wear or more formal often I’d go DJ. You won’t go wrong with either one. I wouldn’t even be considering Tudor.

[Anonymous No.17686494]

>>17686386
Its pretty great for the money

[Anonymous No.17686501]

>>17686480
I tried on the Exp1 and the new 40mm Exp1 a day ago. 6.5" wrist. The 40mm looks good, but the lug length doesn't fit my wrist.
I suggest the Exp1. for the one watch, or a very casually looking variant of DJ. Perhaps from the last generation. No fluted bezels, no jubilee bracelet. Domed/oyster dark dial.
Both options would be relatively bland, but not out of place no matter what you wear. Doesn't draw attention like a maxed out DJ.
I myself am torn between a new Explorer 1 or a 5digit no date or date sub which fit a 6.5 wrist fine. If I were to go DJ it'd be the works: fluted/jubilee etc. But that's not casual enough for me, too sparkly, whereas the Explorer 1 is basically a tarted up field watch. Field watches tarted up or no are prime one-only watches. If you're looking beyond rolex then look for more field style watches for an everyday imo. Divers and all that are less versatile with that sporty bezel.

[Anonymous No.17686506]

>>17686480
Same as this anon >>17686491
I have an Explorer and I absolutely love it, but the Datejust or the Oyster Perpetual 36 are also great choice.

[Anonymous No.17686508]

>>17686491
>>17686501
Leaning towards a fluted/jubilee mint green DJ. Chinos and oxford shirts are about as casual as I go, so hopefully I can pull it off as a daily watch.

[Anonymous No.17686509]

>>17686501
>I want to look like I have no inner monologue at all

[Anonymous No.17686511]

Considering a second hand watch that would have been cool in 2010 and is now not cool but I don’t care.

Would you buy:
Bell and Ross BR03-92 Ceramic
Titanium Panerai Luminor

Open to other ideas but Tudor and Grand Seiko losers please don’t start.

No microshitters

[Anonymous No.17686512]

>>17686511
du du du da da da

[Anonymous No.17686518]

>>17686501
Smooth bezel + jubilee bracelet is underrated imo.
I've never liked the flutted bezel. It's grandpa tier.

[Anonymous No.17686520]

>>17686414
If you care about value for money best stop thinking about watches at all.

[Anonymous No.17686530]

>>17686520
>value for money best stop thinking about watches at all.

Japan exists.
When you buy something like this you tell yourself HOLY SHIT 400$ CAN BUY THIS? SO COOL I"M SO SMART FOR GETTING IT

[Anonymous No.17686532]

>hey anon can I borrow your watch please? It looks better on me anyway teehee ^^
How do you respond?

[Anonymous No.17686535]

>>17686532
This watch is worth more than your life. Begone whore

[Anonymous No.17686554]

Any recommendations of tropic strap for my Seamaster?

[Anonymous No.17686559]

>>17686480
Explorer ii

[Anonymous No.17686560]

>>17686559
Oh shit wait wristlets can't wear 40mm

[Anonymous No.17686561]

WHERES MY HECKIN TAPERED BRACELET ????

[Anonymous No.17686565]

The absolute state of Omega.

[Anonymous No.17686566]

>>17686480
Sub is fine on a 6.5 inch wrist. Especially the older aluminium bezel ones. I'd go for that. Truly a watch for life.

[Anonymous No.17686571]

>>17686532
Yea this happened to me. Gave it to her as a gift.
She wasn't some random semen demon tho, she's my long term girlfriend.
The watch also did look better on her.

[Anonymous No.17686572]

>>17686565
Seiko would have luminous numerals.

[Anonymous No.17686573]

>>17686571
Date hands are so ridiculously dumb.

[Anonymous No.17686575]

>>17686406
>Just rip off a fucking tissot already, how hard is that?
How about you grow some bigger wrists?

[Anonymous No.17686577]

>>17686565
Wtf are they doing?

[Anonymous No.17686590]

>>17686518
How do you get that? Do you have to mod it yourself? From what I understand Rolex only sells jubilee datejusts with fluted bezels and they're fucking autistic about changing bracelets and parts.

[Anonymous No.17686594]

>>17686573
I at first thought so too and preferred a date window but this other way gives you a visual indicator of how much of the month you have left or how long you have left until a certain deadline. Seeing the date in an aperture is quicker for comprehension, just like digital time is, but analog of either gives a more tangible understanding of how much time has passed or how much time you have left until a future point.
I noted that a date hand meant I was more inclined to indolence and to putting tasks off for later because of that physical distance on the dial between the hand and the target date.
That simple
>I've got until the hand gets all the way over there before I have to bother to start worrying about X
got me. Wore it on holiday and it was great, never felt rushed.
Wore it whilst working and it fucked me over a bit because I was retarded and it was February and it slipped my mind that at one point the hand would have to be shifted 4 places clockwise and I didn't have as much time as I'd initially thought. With a date window I'd probably not have been lulled into this sense of having extra time.
Wearing a digital watch during crunch time is preferable of you want to feel extra rushed ime

[Anonymous No.17686599]

>>17686590
No, smooth bezel DJ comes also on jubilee.

[Anonymous No.17686602]

>>17686511
Titanium Luminor

[Anonymous No.17686607]

WHERE IS MY BRACELET TAPER SIRS?

[Anonymous No.17686614]

>>17686381

[Anonymous No.17686619]

>>17686590
Go on rolex and use their configurator; it shows all possible combinations they currently offer. The one in that pic's ref. is probably 126200. Within that ref. number you can get any permutation of dial color/variant and any bracelet type. But change the bezel to fluted or make it twotone in either yellow or rose gold and the ref. # changes.
What AD's get seems to be a lucky dip. Who knows how they decide on this shit as there's too many DJ combinations to even consider keeping all kinds in stock. Maybe you can go to one and request a specific combination. I think may have been possible a few years ago. I doubt so now.

[Anonymous No.17686621]

>>17686594
I don't ever need to know ho wfar I am through a month. I need to know the exact date to sign a contract or write meeting notes.

[Anonymous No.17686630]

>>17686486
Nope, stainless. But solid end links, screw down crown, 200m wr, nice lume, chronograph, no radio control (bs), eco drive...

[Anonymous No.17686633]

>>17686294
Don't edit or change the guide.

[Anonymous No.17686635]

>>17686602
I think this is pretty good advice. Bell and Ross watches are a bit of a joke, feel like the Panerai, while costing double, will hold value.

[Anonymous No.17686636]

>>17686565
>>17686577
That's banter.

>2012: a Rolex Sea Dweller prototype is sent 10,898m deep and comes back working perfectly (Deepsea Challenger piloted by James Cameron)
>2014: Rolex adds to its collection the Sea Dweller Deepsea (with 3900m WR)
>2019: an Omega Seamaster prototype is sent 10,935m deep, comes back working perfectly
>2022: Omega adds to its collection the Seamaster Ultradeep (6000m WR)
>2022: for the 10 years anniversary of the Deepsea Challenger edition, Rolex adds to its collection a new version of the Deepsea with 11,000m WR

So basically,
>Omega holds the record of a watch sent down there by 37m
>Rolex has the watch with the higher water resistance

This new Omega watch with the lumed "OMEGA WAS HERE!" is just a way of messing with Rolex. I'm 99% sure Omega has a prototype of the same watch that says "OMEGA ACTUALLY WENT THERE"

[Anonymous No.17686637]

poorfag here, should I buy the picrel or is it too much of a cope? (I will never own a cartier)

[Anonymous No.17686640]

>>17686637
I like it. Everybody buy Rolex copes too.

[Anonymous No.17686643]

>>17686511
Go for the Pan. B&R is garbage, a jeweler I know said they are his absolute dogs that nobody wants lmao

[Anonymous No.17686648]

>>17686640
Explorer ii cope? I guess the seiko but no white one unless you get the cuckstopher ward

[Anonymous No.17686649]

>>17686565
Wait this picture is not altered? Initially I scrolled past it because I thought you scribbled some stuff on the picture after it was taken.
There's not taking yourself too seriously and then there's being a joke. This one's the latter, what the fuck were they thinking? Looks cheap and clownish. A big 6000m water resist label next to the 11km depth label where some different ominous Omega allegedly went.
KWAB

[Anonymous No.17686650]

>>17686643
Makes sense - it makes me feel like an absolute retard desu but I do love the B&R look - when I young and poor and the BR01 first came out, I thought they were super cool luxury watches and that vibe never really left no matter how much contradictory evidence I’ve seen since.

[Anonymous No.17686655]

>>17686637
This is the acceptable cope Tank, you'll be fine. Maybe get a silver one and not gold like everyone else.

[Anonymous No.17686656]

>>17686565
Phuck me dead. Omega has to stop these cringe special editions already. They have huge potential with both the speedy and the seamaster lines. But no, let’s do another Olympic puke edition or some shit

[Anonymous No.17686660]

>>17686655
The Casio "Santank" is a thing too.

[Anonymous No.17686661]

>>17686637
Or go your own way and get something like this vintage handwound two-hander.

[Anonymous No.17686664]

[Anonymous No.17686665]

>>17686660
I see, wasn't aware of it. Looks decent, the water resist font clashes a bit but ok.

[Anonymous No.17686677]

>>17686664
Dead showhorned meme

[Anonymous No.17686678]

>>17686565
>it's real

[Anonymous No.17686681]

One watch collection
150m water resistance at least

shill me your pic

[Anonymous No.17686683]

>>17686681
>implying I would ever be caught dead daily wearing a disgusting watch with excessive water resistance
30m is enough for me thanks

[Anonymous No.17686686]

>>17686683
https://youtu.be/BunxDrfLQBs

[Anonymous No.17686691]

>>17686681
easy

[Anonymous No.17686692]

>>17686677
>showhorned
Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.17686694]

>>17686686
>Issue
>Hateful or abusive content > Promotes hatred or violence
say bye to youtube chuddy

[Anonymous No.17686696]

>>17686681
Budget? Size?

Breitling Aerospace is wr100 but might do nicely. Id go for something quartz with light, alarm and chrono at least. And light enough you can use it for sports.

There are cheaper (but bigger) citizen titanium aternatives or Casio Lineages too.

[Anonymous No.17686703]

>>17686681
>>17686696
Forgot pic

[Anonymous No.17686711]

>>17686630
>nice lume
>lume plots are black
I doubt that, prove me wrong though

[Anonymous No.17686713]

>>17686681
budget edition

[Anonymous No.17686734]

>>17686635
>Bell and Ross watches are a bit of a joke, feel like the Panerai
Yeah i get that feeling from them as well. One trick pony, no watchmaking to speak of, more of a meme watch.

[Anonymous No.17686735]

>>17686713
Can somebody explain male endlinks to me pls?

Are they cheaper in production or why would you ever make male endlinks? They offer no clear benefit, look ugly and increase the height of a watch unnecessarily!?

[Anonymous No.17686740]

>>17686735
I don't know, i'm more interested in multi-link end links or Individualinks™ as they're now known lately.

[Anonymous No.17686741]

>>17686643
>>17686602
I’ll throw a wrinkle in:

Titanium Luminor
or
Ceramic Radiomir

[Anonymous No.17686743]

>>17686511
Bell and Ross is basically a microbrand

[Anonymous No.17686754]

>>17686636
>2012: a Rolex Sea Dweller prototype is sent 10,898m deep and comes back working perfectly
>2019: an Omega Seamaster prototype is sent 10,935m deep, comes back working perfectly
were they just mounted on the submarine or was there a diver who actually dived to that depth with it. maybe they really did work at 10 km depth, but that was without the movement of the hands which would increase the pressure immensely. i wouldnt dare to actually go diving with either of the prototypes, let alone the publicly available versions

[Anonymous No.17686757]

>>17686735
The OEM Seiko bracelet has female end links I believe

[Anonymous No.17686759]

>>17686754
Retard

[Anonymous No.17686771]

>>17686754
Fucking lol. Any dive below 200m is considered ultra deep and dangerous. So no, they didn’t dive 11000m.

[Anonymous No.17686772]

>>17686754
I reckon testing watches in pressurized tanks is move convenient, anon.

[Anonymous No.17686774]

>>17686310
>>17686357
>>17686359
>>17686361
omega should just release this with the co-axial movement and it will fly off the shelves

[Anonymous No.17686777]

>>17686754
The world record scuba dive is just barely over 1000ft. A normal person would have their lungs collapse at that depth. Anyone would be dead far, far before you could ever reach 36,000ft deep. That's why the metal spheres made to be able to go down that deep are several inches thick and have a sphericity above 99.9%.

[Anonymous No.17686793]

>>17686713
Are these endlinks hollow?

[Anonymous No.17686795]

>>17686793
Probably

[Anonymous No.17686800]

>>17686386
Best watch since the SARB033 was discontinued.

[Anonymous No.17686837]

Just picked up a super cheap 70s timex in pretty good condition

[Anonymous No.17686838]

New Ocean Planet 39.5mm is actually really fucking sexy holyshit

[Anonymous No.17686840]

>>17686838
Gotta love vertical brushed dials.

[Anonymous No.17686844]

>>17686837
Pic rel

[Anonymous No.17686857]

>>17686381

> <=300€
> as long as the movement isn't total garbage.

Mate

[Anonymous No.17686924]

>>17686696
I want a watch that is for swimming off the shore in the Caribbean
The farthest I would ever free dive is 20 feet.
but on average your about 4 feet underwater for 20 minutes an hour meaning you are going down 10ft every 5 minutes

I assume there will be some dings and scrapes from the current swashing you when you are in tighter spaces

[Anonymous No.17686927]

>>17686637
Just get a tank must, they can be found under 1000 and youu get the real deal

[Anonymous No.17686930]

>>17686713
ive been very reluctant to wear a Seiko because of Nick Rochefort

[Anonymous No.17686937]

>>17686930
>Nick Rochefort
explain

[Anonymous No.17686948]

It is so over, bros.

[Anonymous No.17686955]

>>17686948
>posts a gag post from another forum
>treats it like it's serious and endemic to every single watch the brand makes

So, is this species of brainworm unique to /wt/ or does all of 4chan suffer from it?

[Anonymous No.17686958]

>>17686948
For rain you need at least 500m water resistance.

[Anonymous No.17686959]

What discount can you get on this watch?

[Anonymous No.17686963]

https://youtube.com/shorts/0oqCodAFq7A?feature=share

this pussy slut correct?

[Anonymous No.17686967]

>>17686754
>but that was without the movement of the hands which would increase the pressure immensely.
God i hope this is bait

[Anonymous No.17686971]

>>17686963
Blancpain is not mid tier luxury

[Anonymous No.17686982]

>>17686959
Isn't this normally a $500 watch? Did they really crank up the price of this watch just because it's the same color as a movie prop?

[Anonymous No.17686998]

>>17686959
Holy Batman! The Moonswatch sure has some _bona fide_ competition now. Shut up and take my money!!

[Anonymous No.17686999]

>>17686963
No. Never.

[Anonymous No.17687001]

>>17686930
Doesn’t he wear a submariner?

[Anonymous No.17687013]

>>17686958
1200m for monsoons without hand clapping and high fiving ofc

[Anonymous No.17687021]

question for the speedy owners: how many bar is a direct, high-pressure ejaculation?

[Anonymous No.17687031]

>>17687021
Chronographs don't measure pressure, anon.

[Anonymous No.17687032]

>>17686294
https://youtu.be/udGsQPASuX8

listen to this guy curse

[Anonymous No.17687034]

>>17687032
>AS I WENT HOME ON FRIDAY NIGHT,
>AS DRUNK AS DRUNK COULD BE!

[Anonymous No.17687038]

>>17687032
>"The bracelet can't get any better."
>Male endlinks

[Anonymous No.17687039]

>>17686971
>>17686999
This is cope. Blancpain watches either look shit or bland, and the name literally means 'white bread' in baguette.

[Anonymous No.17687041]

>>17686386
is there an eco drive version of this? if i buy a citizen it needs to be as autistic as possible

[Anonymous No.17687043]

>>17686959
you can buy it from a jew for this much

[Anonymous No.17687044]

someone should do a zoom meeting with them and bomb it with the gay black guys

[Anonymous No.17687045]

>>17687044
You mean the ones from the Cartier ads?

[Anonymous No.17687052]

Everyone ITT who wears Cartier is supporting this.

[Anonymous No.17687054]

>>17687052
>he doesn't "scent check" his homies
ok and

[Anonymous No.17687055]

I get the feeling a package from Australia is about to drop.

[Anonymous No.17687059]

>>17687054
Imagine not smellin' yo homie's dick 2 check if they's fresh & fit bfore hittin' the rizzodome

[Anonymous No.17687061]

>>17687039
Neither of those things matter. Omega, Tudor, and Rolex are basically completely machine finished and BP has extensive hand finishing. It’s really that simple. All you have to do is look at a BP movement versus the others and it’s extremely obvious. It’s not a knock on the other brands, plenty of Fifty Fathoms will run you $19k or so new when you can get a Sub for $10k or a Seamaster for $8k. They’re different market segments.

[Anonymous No.17687092]

this is a cope watch, isn't it.

[Anonymous No.17687111]

>>17687092
Totally

[Anonymous No.17687117]

>>17687092
Their watch made it to the summit, not rolex. The only cope here is rolex and their marketing - they coped all the way to the bank.

[Anonymous No.17687120]

>>17687092
That's not cope, that's a MEGA COPE.

[Anonymous No.17687123]

>>17687092
There's a video on YouTube of a watch guy reviewing I think 4 explorer homage watches compared to the actual explorer and he was over the moon about how much better and closer to the original the Islander Manhasset was compared to the smiths and the others.

[Anonymous No.17687126]

>>17687092
Everything's a cope desu, tudor is the biggest cope though

Tudorfags btfo

[Anonymous No.17687131]

>>17687092
>Hour hand wants to be a Rolex
>Face wants to be a Timex
>Brand logo wants to be Braun

What an absolute mutt of a watch, just get a real Timex at that point.

[Anonymous No.17687135]

>>17686711
There you go

[Anonymous No.17687136]

The Aquaracer is underappreciated

[Anonymous No.17687137]

>>17687123

[Anonymous No.17687138]

Unironically really in love with the new PO summer blue 39mm

[Anonymous No.17687139]

>>17687136
>Tag Huehue
LOL NO

[Anonymous No.17687141]

Finally found a microshitter I like.
Actually the exact thing I'm looking for.
You gotta wait if you want it.
Fuck this gay earth.

[Anonymous No.17687144]

>>17687138
>t.

[Anonymous No.17687146]

>>17687139
My point precisely. It's actually a pretty cool watch in spite of being a TAG Heuer.

[Anonymous No.17687147]

>>17687146
Nothing with Huehue on the dial is valuable. Don't fool yourself.

[Anonymous No.17687148]

>>17687136
rolex bros...

[Anonymous No.17687151]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HvPy0C62qk

[Anonymous No.17687158]

>>17686571
What watch was it?

[Anonymous No.17687159]

>>17687151
field watches are for manchildren

[Anonymous No.17687167]

>>17687138
> digits aren't lumed.
>Look at it in the dark
>See stumped indexes at 12, 3, 6, 9 and full indexes at 1,2,4etc

It's disgusting.
Look at this Citizen >>17687135
- they actually can lume their numerals properly, unlike the mountain Jews, pathetic.

[Anonymous No.17687169]

>>17686487
It's a $50 watch sold $250. The "bio ceramic" is a marketing ploy and is just composite plastic. It's super light and plasticky, just like most other Swatches, so it feels like a toy, NOT like an Omega. The scratch bracelet will last 1 or 2 years top, the battery 2 years (lmao) and the rest of the watch 5 years if you're wearing it daily, and it will quickly look like shit. And the final nail in the coffin is the 3 ATM WR, which means you're at risk of getting fog inside it by simply sneezing on it. Think about what you could get for $250 instead of that trash.

[Anonymous No.17687173]

>>17687135
better than expected
wear it in good health ;^)

[Anonymous No.17687176]

I live in Japan. I have like 1,200,000 yen in my bank account, maybe a little more.

Been thinking of buying a Grand Seiko but the dials look a little too busy and the overall vibe is that it's something a 50 year old would wear.

I want a pantydropper watch, so I'm heavily considering getting a DateJust in decent condition. I ususally see them go for anywhere between 6-800,000, although I have seen one really nice one for sale at 1,500,000.

Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.17687177]

Fucking post something

[Anonymous No.17687183]

>>17687176
As in all your money for a watch? No don't do that
As in that's your budget? Yeah, go for the rollie, or a sneed

[Anonymous No.17687188]

>>17687176
Dont spend on a watch more than 10% of your savings or so, anon.

[Anonymous No.17687191]

>>17687176
>I want a pantydropper watch
spend the money elsewhere. you're only going to get compliments from old guys. if you're handsome and well dressed women will compliment your casio

[Anonymous No.17687196]

>>17686844
Looks like you are wearing your granpas watch, in a good way.

[Anonymous No.17687197]

>>17686777
>>17686777
Cute arm. No hair though, weird.

[Anonymous No.17687201]

>>17686774
Omega should ditch their co-axial movement.
It brings nothing to the table, it's unnecessary thick and the fact Omega can't have it run at 4Hz is enough proof it was a stupid idea from the start.

[Anonymous No.17687202]

>>17687176
in japan then there is one choice to attract the waifus

[Anonymous No.17687208]

>>17687176
go to a hooker?

[Anonymous No.17687210]

>>17687201
Datejust
>11m thick
>run at 4Hz
>70h power reserve
>5mm micro adjustment on the bracelet
Aqua Terra
>13mm thick
>run at 3,5Hz
>50h power reserve
>no micro adjustment on the bracelet

Omega niggers
>"DURRRRRR THE AQUA TERRA IS A GOOD ALTERNATIVE TO THE DATEJUST"

[Anonymous No.17687211]

>>17687201
imagine a slim moon...

[Anonymous No.17687214]

>>17687176
>pantydropper
No watch drops panties by itself. Get what YOU like. You can't miss with Grand Seiko. You also can't miss with Rolex. Get a watch you like and enjoy it.

[Anonymous No.17687224]

>>17687210
In fact, best Aqua Terra is the Railmaster, which really is an alternative to the no date rolexes. With better magnetic and water resist.

And 12.5mm thick for 40mm case.

[Anonymous No.17687226]

>>17687224
lmao I'd get an Explorer over this any day

[Anonymous No.17687230]

>>17687226
I might too, but its still a good alternative. The case back is pretty kino too with the self centering sistem and the seahorse btw.

Also, id consider more of a direct contender pic related. A less formal and more colorful design.

[Anonymous No.17687231]

>>17687151

[Anonymous No.17687233]

>>17687224
the denim one is cool

[Anonymous No.17687234]

>>17687176
>Thoughts?

[Anonymous No.17687235]

>>17687176
You can prob find a sneed for 600k yen, maybe even less if you shop around / buy used

Don't buy a watch in hope of attracting the opposite sex

[Anonymous No.17687239]

[Anonymous No.17687242]

i like this but i think they reused the 6 for the 9

[Anonymous No.17687243]

>>17687242
It looks crooked.

[Anonymous No.17687247]

>arab dealers require you to spend 100k aed (27k usd) to get a rolex
honestly? thought the buy history limit was way more wtf

how much is it for americans

[Anonymous No.17687250]

>>17687243
i guess that's the problem with linear textures on dials

[Anonymous No.17687251]

>>17687247
Also dilemma here, I've spend already 25k (aud) at my local AD, should I buy a moonwatch locally (3k more) to build more rapport for a rolex eventually, or go grey and save myself 3k

[Anonymous No.17687253]

[Anonymous No.17687256]

>>17687251
Keep your dignity and stop sucking your AD's cock.

[Anonymous No.17687257]

>>17687242
I personally don’t mind if 6 was 9

[Anonymous No.17687258]

>>17687251
>Tier 3 rewards ($25k-50k):
>All the content of free tier, plus
>Exclusive mailing list
>More opportunities to spend
>Sticker pack
>>17687257
it's also missing a 3, so...

[Anonymous No.17687259]

>>17687258
What's the dailies and weeklies of sucking ADs cock?
F2Pbros... How do win...

[Anonymous No.17687275]

>>17687259
>daily AD's cock sucking bonus : you receive an email keeping you updated on your current position on the waiting list.
>weekly bonus : the AD calls you personally, and compliments you for your cock sucking skills.

[Anonymous No.17687280]

>>17686424
>>17686431
>>17687256
>>17687259
>>17687275
>can't stop about sucking cocks
Seriously, you faggots have some fucked up thoughts.
Stop watching gay porn for a while, this is utterly disgusting.

[Anonymous No.17687281]

Why would anyone pay $7900 for pic related, when you can buy the OG Bond Seamaster (2531.80) for $2700 freshly serviced and get the same Omega mesh for $800? Around $3500 in total

[Anonymous No.17687282]

>>17687281
Better question: "why would anyone buy an Omega?"

[Anonymous No.17687283]

>>17687282
sneed

[Anonymous No.17687285]

>>17687281
where are the ripples on the 2531.80? also who puts a mesh band on a diver

[Anonymous No.17687286]

>>17687283
I actually like the design of the Sneedmaster (unlike the Seamaster) but I find Omega's marketing beyond cringe and distasteful.

[Anonymous No.17687290]

>>17687280
Hey, not our fault if ADs like to get their smegma eaten off by their customers.

[Anonymous No.17687293]

>>17687290
>think he's owning Rolex buyers by revealing his own nasty homosexual thoughts

[Anonymous No.17687301]

>>17687293
>Reports stories of customers licking and fingering their AD's asshole so they can finally get their submariner
>Gets called gay
Nice deflection Rolex fag. However, I'm not the one doing nasty things to simply have the right to buy a fucking watch.

[Anonymous No.17687307]

>>17687285
>where are the ripples on the 2531.80?
Are you blind?

[Anonymous No.17687310]

>>17687301
>he's still describing the homosexual scenes that haunt him
>somehow it's the others who are gay, not him

[Anonymous No.17687327]

>>17687177
very cool, I hope you got the japanese version

[Anonymous No.17687338]

>>17687327
Is that a legit virtual armor ? That's pretty cool, but how much did you pay for it ?

[Anonymous No.17687348]

>>17687338
1400

[Anonymous No.17687350]

>>17687281
You also wouldn't have to deal with fagmega's gimmicky bullshit movement that fucks itself to death if you do not have it serviced precisely at the mandatory interval unlike pretty much any other movement out there whose recommended service interval is actually a lie designed to fleece retards out of easy money for the official service center. The old 1120 caliber, aka an ETA 2892, you could wear for 20 years and not give a shit about and it's an easy fix for any retard with tools, unlike this mutilated and trannified Daniels co-axial that needs a microscope to service.
If they could just get rid of this shit Omega would fix a lot of the issues surrounding their brand and then they'd be just a little bit closer to Rolex, who they desperately wish to be seen as equal to. lmao
Thinner watches.
Higher beat rate.
A service that's actually worth the money.

[Anonymous No.17687351]

>>17687348
Retard lmfao.

[Anonymous No.17687354]

is it cringe to daily casio 168 in current year?

[Anonymous No.17687355]

>>17687354
yeah, where's your explorer bro?

[Anonymous No.17687359]

>>17687307
yes, and a retard

[Anonymous No.17687360]

>>17687351
why are you miffed?

[Anonymous No.17687364]

>>17687350
>Higher beat rate.
how high do you want? 28800 seems fine

[Anonymous No.17687369]

>>17687364
>28800 seems fine
Then why doesn't omega use 28800 then?

[Anonymous No.17687371]

>>17686381
Get a g shock

[Anonymous No.17687372]

>>17687350
>If they could just get rid of this shit Omega would fix a lot of the issues surrounding their brand and then they'd be just a little bit closer to Rolex
they never will be in a league with Rolex again and their movements have nothing to do with it
by making quartz mall shitters during the 90s they have forever tainted their image, no matter how great the watches are they make today

[Anonymous No.17687375]

>>17687372
Many such cases. Breitling and Tag Heuer were (and still are) the worst in pushing gaudy shitters. I would even say Tudor is suffering the same fate

[Anonymous No.17687378]

>>17687364
>>17687369

Higher beat rate only really achieves something meaninful at 36000, so you can have a chronograph with tents o seconds.

Anything else, doesnt matter. In fact lower beat rates give you better power reserves (all the rest equal) and higher durability. Suposedly you lose accuracy, but isnt always the case.

[Anonymous No.17687380]

>>17687364
Omega's movements beat at 25,200vph

[Anonymous No.17687382]

>>17687375
and lets not forget all the great watchmakers who didnt survive the quartz crisis at all
you had two choices, make quartz shitters and compete with Casio or abandon the tool watch space and go full luxury
Rolex chose wisely

[Anonymous No.17687383]

>>17687380
Doesnt matter at all. Except if its a chronograph.

[Anonymous No.17687384]

>>17687354
It's pretty based, actually.

[Anonymous No.17687386]

>>17687257
Based Hendrix reference.

[Anonymous No.17687389]

>>17687382
Rolex made the Oysterquartz. They TRIED to compete with the Japanese. The only difference was that they were smart enough to realize quickly that they could not.

[Anonymous No.17687391]

>>17687372
They made some good quartzs. The SMP300m quartz (first Bond Omega in Goldeneye), was the thinnest 300m profesional diver back then and still has to be there. Kept decent time, and you could even swap the movement for the superquartz version (most of which were stamped "Longines" tho).

[Anonymous No.17687395]

>>17686959
Do not buy any Hamilton Khakis until they fix their shitty sapphire crystals.

[Anonymous No.17687396]

>>17686959
>Spending that much on a hamilshit
Spend half on a decent seiko or citizen and call it a day m8

[Anonymous No.17687397]

>>17687350
>You also wouldn't have to deal with fagmega's gimmicky bullshit movement that fucks itself to death if you do not have it serviced precisely at the mandatory interval unlike pretty much any other movement out there whose recommended service interval is actually a lie designed to fleece retards out of easy money for the official service center. The old 1120 caliber, aka an ETA 2892, you could wear for 20 years and not give a shit about and it's an easy fix for any retard with tools, unlike this mutilated and trannified Daniels co-axial that needs a microscope to service.
is this true or is anon full of shit? my grandpa had seiko 5 that he wore every day for 30 or 40 years. never had it serviced until it stopped working, had it fixed for cheap and it's still running. i find it hard to believe that coaxial omega or any non complicated more expensive automatic movement wouldnt exceed that
i might be wrong here, but i would rather not service watch at all as long as it works, than to service it every 5-10 years. i think, unless it is done by someone who does it with insane amount of care like patek, they are far more likely to make damage and introduce dust and dirt particles to the case and movement
youtube.com/watch?v=bhRqIhHZkmk

[Anonymous No.17687398]

>>17686532
cock cage then boyremoval

[Anonymous No.17687405]

>Quartz is le bad

[Anonymous No.17687406]

>tushit

[Anonymous No.17687407]

>>17687397
if you don't service a seiko 5 and the movement eats itself to shit, you just swap out the movement for 20$ and call it a day, good as new, hell, it's probably a good part cheaper to change the movement with a new one than to actually spend time servicing it
if you don't service an expensive in house movement and it eats itself to the point of needing to replace the movement, that's gonna cost you possibly more than what you would have paid for 2-3 services during the usage that would have kept it in good condition
honestly, I'm not a fan of servicing my watches either, I don't trust those battery monkeys to not fuck something up, because so far they're basically 100% accurate at doing something wrong with my watches

[Anonymous No.17687409]

>>17687383
I agree but if you take a look at the whole picture you have
>lower beat rate than the (now) standard 28,800vph
>rather weak power reserve compared to other brands in the same price point or lower
>THICC cases
On top on that you can add
>pain in the ass to have them service
>terrible bracelets
>outdated METAS certification (which is mostly about magnetic resistance and doesn't make a lot of sense nowadays considering all brands use paramagnetic materials for their escape wheels)

All of these combined make me say Omega isn't worth the money.
I won't even mention their marketing strategy, celebrities endorsement and all that because that's subjective... but fucking hell I honestly don't get why anyone would buy one at this point.

[Anonymous No.17687411]

>>17687348
Do you feel like it was worth that price ? What do you think about the Bluetooth function ?

[Anonymous No.17687414]

>>17687409
>outdated METAS certification
i think the only reason why they use it is because master chronometer on the dial looks very cool

[Anonymous No.17687417]

>>17687173
Thanks anon.

[Anonymous No.17687420]

>>17687417
PIZZOORRRRRRRRRRRRR

[Anonymous No.17687436]

>>17687378
cope
they were forced to lower the rate because their bastardized cocuxial can't handle it and tears itself apart otherwise
what a joke

[Anonymous No.17687439]

>>17687409
>rather weak power reserve compared to other brands in the same price point or lower
They’re 55 or 60 hours. (They will actually run closer to 70 hours but at that point the variance starts to go to hell just like with all movements.) How much do you need?

[Anonymous No.17687440]

im thinking of buying bb58 or pelagos. with everything getting more expensive i figure this is my last chance to get a non shitter for not that much money. i have no doubt that in year or 2, border between shitters and decent will move up couple of grand. my wrist size is 6.5 inch. i want to be able to wear it every day and everywhere so, aside from the model, im not sure whether to go with black or blue dial? im only considering those 2 dial options for either

[Anonymous No.17687443]

>>17687440
>>17687440
Go grey and get a speedy

[Anonymous No.17687444]

>Seikocels fuming again at the latest brand to get attention today…
Their emotions are as misaligned as their chapter rings and bezels.

[Anonymous No.17687450]

>>17687378
This is some high level turbocope. The Swiss standard for decades has been 28k and swatch have had to downgrade in every instance to cut corners like with their shitty plastic Soimatic and, worse, with the Co-axials which are meant to be high quality calibers in the premium watches of an ostensibly luxury brand.

[Anonymous No.17687453]

>>17687439
60 hours is acceptable. But then again the standard in premium/luxury sports watches is 70h. Same thing with the beat rate, 25,200 is fine but Omega is below the standard of 28,800vph.

Omega simply has less to offer than, let's say, Tudor.

[Anonymous No.17687454]

>>17687417
holy fuck "edc" (and spyderco in particular) is lame

[Anonymous No.17687458]

>>17687450
a moser and most of the small scale stuff is like 21600bph

[Anonymous No.17687460]

>>17687417
>stealthy watch
>couple of folding pocket knives
London?

[Anonymous No.17687461]

>>17687409
Add that their cases, bracelets, dials and who knows how much of their movements are made in china.
Want an Omega? Buy vintage, not this name that is nothing but compromise and cope.

[Anonymous No.17687463]

Stop
I WILL get a Speedy

STOP THIS OMEGAFUDDING
STOPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

[Anonymous No.17687471]

>>17687458
The tiny upper end like patek etc., have always done that because they have always been resistant to change. The majority of the industry took up the 28k sweet spot. Omega was in this range and thus this is a downgrade and no amount of pilpul will change this fact.

[Anonymous No.17687477]

>>17687463
Better you know now before you buy so at least you won't go through a butthurtcopepocalypse after finding out all this shit afterward like some have. Buying now with all this knowledge means you really wanted the watch.

[Anonymous No.17687484]

>>17687389
one model with a very limited run and they never sold their watches at walmart like Omega

[Anonymous No.17687494]

>>17687378
>>17687450
>>17687436
>>17687458
I have no issue with the 25k beat, after all Patek, VC, AP, Lange etc., use it or lower. I don't like however the reason why it had to lowered in the Omega co-axials. It bespeaks of a company going full sunk cost into an escapement they should've abandoned early on once they realized, like Patek did before them, that Daniels' escapement only works as intended in Daniels' and Smith's watches. It smells of desperation, of clinging to something seemingly unique they could market the hell out of to try to compete with Rolex when they could've achieved the same or better without it. Clingy desperation isn't very luxurious.

[Anonymous No.17687500]

>Omega being torn a second asshole in this thread
Good. They deserve it.

[Anonymous No.17687507]

>>17687500
I’ve been to every AD aside from like patek/ap//etc and Omega had consistently the least friendly sales assistants. Legitimately the Rolex people were nicer to me

[Anonymous No.17687510]

>>17687507
>Legitimately the Rolex people were nicer to me
are you an arab sheik or a CCP member?

[Anonymous No.17687512]

>>17687500
I seldom visit these threads anymore but have been surprised at the sentiment towards this brand. Last I used to frequent them omega was regarded as around the same level as tag, maybe a little higher. Where did all these posters gaslighting others into thinking of the penismoon, aquaterra or any seamaster past 2004 as something worth their money? Reddit? Does Archie still shill the motfm? Is he even still alive?

[Anonymous No.17687515]

>>17687512
what happened in 2004?

[Anonymous No.17687517]

>>17687515
Spiderman 2 came out and the world changed

[Anonymous No.17687521]

>>17687411
I never use the bluetooth. It's really an $800 watch, the problem is that it's the only way to get all those features so Casio has a niche they can exploit. The steel models are really $300 watches but again there is no equivalent competition so the can charge over $500 for it. I do have it in 3 different versions so I'm willing to pay but Casio's only competition is Casio.

[Anonymous No.17687527]

>>17687460
Keyring is a knifeless leatherman

[Anonymous No.17687528]

>>17687515
It's when Omega started shoehorning in their iteration of co-axial escapements into eta base movements. Before this the blue brosnan seamaster could be had with the (eta) cal. 1120. They were not good movements and were fraught will problems.

[Anonymous No.17687529]

>>17686431
>>17686735
>>17687038
Autism (incurable)

[Anonymous No.17687531]

>>17687440
>Pelagos 39 loses the cool 3d chapter ring
>San Shartin 39 knockoff manages to retain it plus has blue and date options
How did they fuck up so badly?

[Anonymous No.17687533]

Am I the only one here who thinks Omega is a douchebag brand?
Whenever I see a Seamaster 300M I'm automatically picturing some 35 years old balding sales manager with shitty arm tattoos, wearing electric blue slim fit suits, and driving a BMW M3.

[Anonymous No.17687534]

>>17687531
well turdor left it out to have something to be considered an upgrade in the next edition they will release in couple years
can't make the perfect watch, what will the goys buy afterwards?

[Anonymous No.17687535]

>>17687137
Fake Christopher Walkin doesn't lie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ni6ExkeaGJw

[Anonymous No.17687544]

>>17687533
I don’t know. Usually I only see SMPs on 50 year old boomers. Rolex seems more the sleeve tattoo havers watch of choice.

[Anonymous No.17687545]

>>17687533
This is complete cope, you're describing the average Rolex buyer.

[Anonymous No.17687547]

>>17687545
That’s this whole thread. Just shit on everything you can’t afford in attempt to meme into reality that some Casio or microshitter is actually the “””best”””.

[Anonymous No.17687561]

>>17687545
Rolex is so big and has such a wide price range it has a very diverse clientele.
>boomers
>business owners and managers
>hardcore watch enthusiasts
>menswear enthusiasts
>normal dudes who just want a nice watch for their 40yo birthday
>niggers

Omega has that "fashiony" and loud aesthetic that specifically attracts douchebags. It's also the typical baby's first expensive watch because of how easily attainable it is.

[Anonymous No.17687563]

>>17687561
i don't know if you have autism or what but all those people buy omega as well

[Anonymous No.17687564]

>>17687533
youre thinking of Rolex

[Anonymous No.17687570]

>>17687521
Very nice collection.
>the problem is that it's the only way to get all those features so Casio has a niche they can exploit.
As a poorfag, I'll always thank the Chinese for giving us the titanium mod kits option, it's a good way to cope with the fact that I'll never buy a $1k+ Gshock. And you're right when you say that Casio and Gshock don't really have direct competition, which is strange after all those years when you think about it.

[Anonymous No.17687575]

>>17687563
Nah. For example Rolex is a lot more respected among watch makers, collectors and enthusiasts.
Omega is more pleb tier. Wearing one shows lack of taste.

[Anonymous No.17687579]

>>17687510
Oh they're friendly at the rolex boutique all right. They'll say with a smile on their faces as they offer you a cool drink as respite from the summer heat that unfortunately the watches you see before you are "exhibition" only, and that you're welcome to try them on and be put on an endless list. I've never had issues with the omega boutique where I'm from either though.

>>17687533
>Am I the only one here who thinks Omega is a douchebag brand?
I've not noticed this specifically with omega. It's the brand of COPE if anything.
Douchebaggery and shitty tattoos etc., is pervasive in liberal western cities and not unique to omega buyers.
I'm more inclined to label anyone wearing those faggy bracelets next to their watches that were popular a few years ago as douches, and seiko to ap wearers had that shit going on.

[Anonymous No.17687581]

>>17687575
So how long you been on the waiting list? Going on three years for me.

[Anonymous No.17687587]

>>17687570
Chinese kits are great, I just wish I could ignore the littledifferences. I actually saw an MRG kit that looked pretty cool.
Casio was a tech company and they got btfo by smart watches so their new strategy is materials and finish. I understand why there aren't more DLC options since it can still get scratched and there is no easy fix. I wish there were more titanium options, steel is very flexible but titanium is better in a lot of ways. Maybe now that even rolex has a titanium watch other companies get more options.

[Anonymous No.17687598]

>>17687547
I'm content with Casios and microshitters. It's not hard to find watches that I personally enjoy in my price range.

t. averagefag

[Anonymous No.17687600]

>>17687598
Why does it feel like microbrands went to shit? Do you have brands you trust or do you make a judgement on each brand? Give some examples.

[Anonymous No.17687614]

>>17687587
>Chinese kits are great, I just wish I could ignore the littledifferences.
It's definitely not 1:1, the finitions on the legit titanium and MRG G-shocks are flawless. On the mod kits, not so much, but that's alright, you get what you're paying for (I can't upload pics rn but it's not perfect).

I hope titanium will become more common on watches, high grade titanium like Casio is using is of course light, but also very scratch resistant. It's definitely all around better than steel.

[Anonymous No.17687622]

>>17687614
The MRG has higher grade but the regular titanium is base titanium, no reason it shouldn't be more widespread.

[Anonymous No.17687628]

>>17687622
There is less demand from the market. Simple as. People prefer steel and/or gold.

[Anonymous No.17687635]

>>17687628
True. Hopefully the yatch-master sells well and they release a smaller size titanium model. That will be a true test of the demand for titanium in my opinion.

[Anonymous No.17687636]

>>17687622
>>17687614
QRD me on the MrG that looks like a 5600. Why does it cost 4 grand? Is there a custom module inside or is it all just the window dressing with the same basif internals?

[Anonymous No.17687641]

>>17687635
Isn't the yacht master mostly considered a joke?

[Anonymous No.17687654]

>>17687641
Here, yes. In the real world, no.
It started as a more luxurious Submariner style watch. Now, the precious metal 42mm versions on the rubber are Rolex’s equivalent of an APROO or Big Bang.

[Anonymous No.17687656]

>>17687641
This is my favorite watch Rolex currently makes unironically

[Anonymous No.17687658]

>>17687636
The internals are the same, you just get high grade titanium in a hand polished multipart design.

[Anonymous No.17687661]

>>17687636
https://youtu.be/F6nYTo3Sqe0
Those ones ? The modules just have Bluetooth (that you probably won't use if you can reliably catch the atomic clock signal) over the classic 5610 functions like multiband 6 and tough solar. So you're paying $3900 for an admittedly very nice looking body kit.

[Anonymous No.17687662]

>>17687656
The big numbers on the dial look toyish to me but I would get it if I had the wrists for it.

[Anonymous No.17687665]

>>17687661
>>17687658
Thanks. I went past the casio boutique at a mall and they had these in a glass case. Saw the price and noped out of there.

[Anonymous No.17687687]

>>17687656
Isn't the titanium bezel going to get scratched to shit?

[Anonymous No.17687690]

watch maker told me these were fine except sometimes they're not oiled

wt btfo

[Anonymous No.17687693]

>>17687687
The older versions on the rose gold models were rose gold coated in ceramic. I don't know what the new ones use for the bezel.

[Anonymous No.17687698]

>>17687690
What determines if you get an oiled one or not? Is it a social credit score thing?

[Anonymous No.17687701]

>>17687687
>>17687693
The new one does have a titanium bezel but the black coating on it is still ceramic so you'll scratch the case or side of the bezel but not the front.

[Anonymous No.17687702]

>>17687698
It's a maogame
you have to play in order to find out

[Anonymous No.17687710]

>>17687665
>Saw the price and noped out of there.
I can't blame you. I believe Casio should create a high end titanium line around $1k, and keep the crazy prices for limited editions MRG like the Gassan. I KNOW it is probably overpriced (costs about the same as a Speedmaster) and probably looks tacky to most people, but I still love it. At least it's truely special.

[Anonymous No.17687729]

>>17687710
They’re also Xbox huge. Doesn’t matter how much handcraft has gone into it, it still looks like a child’s toy.

[Anonymous No.17687733]

new thread
>>17687731
>>17687731
>>17687731
>>17687731
>>17687731

[Anonymous No.17687780]

>>17687239
Beautiful

[Anonymous No.17687813]

>>17687702
kek yes