Why do women dress more revealingly then men?

[Anonymous No.17640467]

>crop tops
>short shorts/skirts
>spaghetti straps and strapless shoulders
>backless
>sheer/cutouts
>tighter fabrics that shows their curves
>g-string
>lower necklines and cleavage

Do they really enjoy wearing all that, or are they confined to white western patriarchal male gaze? Are they okay with dressing like that when children are present? We truly are living in the end times.

[Anonymous No.17640469]

>>17640467
Because they’re attention seeking whores, and we live in an era where that is no longer shamed

[Anonymous No.17640478]

>>17640467
Because sexual dimorphism. Women have different bodies than men. We decided that the things that make women physically different from us are attractive. The fashion industry designs clothes to draw attention to those things.

[Anonymous No.17640491]

>>17640478
but why can't they do the same to men?
why is it that when men dress even remotely less bland, it's considered "faggy"

[Anonymous No.17640502]

>>17640478
I’m not a degenerate and find modesty attractive. I don’t need to see half-naked women waltzing around in public to see a titty. Yes women are different and opposites attract but a woman does not need to make visible all her different parts that separate her from a man in order for me to either recognise her as a woman or find her feminine/attractive

I hate retarded coombrains that encourage this foul behaviour, not because “Le Feminism” but because dumb shit like “Free the nipple” benefits simps more than it empowers women

[Anonymous No.17640508]

>>17640502
i like when women dress sexy yet still classy

sundresses for example are classy, yet are delicate enough that it leaves enough to imagination and makes you want to see what's underneath

[Anonymous No.17640528]

>>17640508
Sundresses are like wolves in sheep’s clothing. A dress with cleavage and a skirt length that shows off panties or pussy any time a woman sits is exactly that. Slap on a print your grandma would wear and all of a sudden it’s a “sundress” and “modest” - just proof that this whole tradwife craze bullshit is pick me girls on social media larping as non-whores when they’re still just the same old whores anyway

[Anonymous No.17640783]

>>17640467
i think we ought to just ban women from wearing clothes

[Anonymous No.17640878]

>>17640491
Being excessively concerned about grooming is considered effeminate, therefore inadequate for men.
Let's say you just want to wear short shorts and no shirt? You can, actually. There are several instances where that's allowed, like at the beach, or running. But if you dress like that in a party you will primarily draw attention from fags and therefore people will think you're dressing like this to attract fags.
>But I want to attract women!
Then just dress like they want you to dress.

[Anonymous No.17640940]

>>17640467
Cause they look sexier that way and hot girls love making us men drool while making other women seethe in envy, the real question is why are you such a faggot who doesnt want that?

[Anonymous No.17640947]

>>17640467
how else would anyone know how much they are not asking for it?

[Anonymous No.17642425]

>>17640491
I mean you can find some revealing clothes for men but you're asking for a pretty massive cultural shift. It's all homophobia that's been pervasive in society for a long time. It's getting better but it's not gonna happen overnight.

[Anonymous No.17642510]

>>17640467
they're born to lure men into fucking them

[Anonymous No.17642524]

>>17640467
You sound like a massive faggot

[Anonymous No.17642652]

>>17640528
this

[Anonymous No.17642837]

>>17640491
I mean you're probably going to laugh at the answer but it is patriarchy. It cuts both ways. One of the ways patriarchy cuts against men is that is forces them into ridged social roles. A symptom of that is expressing your masculinity through fashion is much more narrowly defined because anything that deviates too much is considers feminine and when the feminine is translated to a man thats what "gay" is.

[Anonymous No.17642851]

Clothing is about projecting identity. Male clothing protects wealth, power, and competence. Women do not need to drive value from those things, women have intrinsic value. So women's clothing is about social status and sexual attractiveness - either they are trying to attract a man or they have one and they are expressing the status they derive from their partner.

That's all there is to it. There's no point in men wearing revealing clothes because society doesn't value that in the first place.

As for if it's patriarchy to blame, yes. But don't make the mistake of confusing patriarchy with men. Women built the patriarchy too and are equally to blame. They wear clothes like that because they personally benefit from it.

[Anonymous No.17642854]

I only wish they WOULD wear skirts again. Where I live they're all wearing these horrible psuedo-sports leggings that I guess are supposed to look slutty but just look bad.

[Anonymous No.17643059]

>>17640467
Someone post the monkey picture, you know the one

[Anonymous No.17643290]

Women literally exist to be filled with cum then pivot to matronly future grandmothers in their 30s. That's why they hit the wall so young.

[Anonymous No.17643392]

>>17642854
It's not too bad especially when the camel toes are on display

[Anonymous No.17643398]

>>17640467
Be the change you want to see in the world, OP. I believe in you

[Anonymous No.17643634]

>>17642854
The ass though

[Anonymous No.17643852]

exact opposite in my neck of the woods... typical for guys (like me) to wear nothing but short tight lycra like pic-related whereas women rarely go risque

[Anonymous No.17643888]

>>17640467
Feminism.