/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.17637639]

Well?

[Anonymous No.17637643]

>>17637639
Let's see Paul Allen's casio.

[Anonymous No.17637646]

based CASIO

[Anonymous No.17637668]

>buy both
>open them up
>put the movement from the a168w into the a158w
Anyone tried this? Not sure about the case dimensions.

[Anonymous No.17637670]

>>17637639
Left has
>SOVL
glow.
Right has a better luminescence but's harsher on the eyes in total dark.

[Anonymous No.17637699]

>>17637639
only differences are light and size basically if you care about the light your a faggot and i prefer smaller watches so i like the 158 better

[Anonymous No.17637974]

>>17637668
168 has a thicker movement than the 159. Won't work.

[Anonymous No.17638571]

A158 vs A700, lads?

[Anonymous No.17638608]

I prefer the case shape of the 158

[Anonymous No.17638660]

yes.

[Anonymous No.17638671]

>>17638660
The 700 should come in black, too.

[Anonymous No.17638683]

I got this one.

(not my photo)

[Anonymous No.17639000]

step aside nerds

[Anonymous No.17639022]

>>17639000
looks like a mcdonalds toy lol fucking james bond WORLD TIME plastic case shitter

[Anonymous No.17639027]

>>17639022
>looks like a mcdonalds toy
wouldn't be kino if it didn't
>plastic case
mine isn't, try again

[Anonymous No.17639049]

>>17639027
>m-mine isn't!
loooooooooool

[Anonymous No.17639054]

>>17639000
nice digits.

[Anonymous No.17639076]

A700 > A158 > A168. A168 shouldn't even be considered. It's fat and the face colors are cartoonish.

[Anonymous No.17639081]

>>17639000

[Anonymous No.17639086]

>>17637639
For me, it's the A168W.

[Anonymous No.17640141]

>>17639000
Nice wrist, faggot.

[Anonymous No.17640145]

>>17640141
that's my dick retard

[Anonymous No.17640176]

for me it's the a700 with the cooler strap

[Anonymous No.17640243]

>>17640141

[Anonymous No.17640262]

>Buying a casio that doesn't display month date weekday and time of day
what a waste

[Anonymous No.17641179]

>>17639000
I bought this clunky piece of shit only for the Big Boss meme. I actually wouldn't recommend it too much.

[Anonymous No.17641231]

>>17640262
Not everyone here has Alzheimer, gramps.

[Anonymous No.17641757]

is there any other watch that his this beige and steel combo. Love-hate how this is probably the most complimented watch for me.

[Anonymous No.17641999]

The F-84W has quickly become my favorite. It's so damn comfortable.

[Anonymous No.17642023]

>>17639000
Fuck what EVERYONE else in this thread thinks, I absolutely adore this watch with every ounce of my heart. The only aspect of it I don't really like is the tactility of the buttons and I'd much prefer a blue light to the stock orange. I intend to mod it later.

This is all assuming though that it's not too big for your wrist. Then yeah it'll look goofy and in turn make your wrists look even smaller.

[Anonymous No.17642098]

Is this really that much bigger than the classic terrorist casio? I have a 7.1 inch wrist

[Anonymous No.17642164]

>>17641757
There's no reason for some of these colors to work but they do

[Anonymous No.17642431]

>>17637643
Check it Bateman

[Anonymous No.17642742]

>>17642098
It's definitely thicker and larger. Which is actually a good thing when you're not a woman or a manlet. I don't really understand the appeal of the non-G-shock Casios.

[Anonymous No.17642796]

>>17642742
I find G-Shocks butt-ugly.

[Anonymous No.17642809]

>>17642796
They come in all shapes and sizes. Thinking the huge ones look ugly is understandable, but if you think a full metal Casioak doesn't look good, you simply don't have taste. And the classic square G-shock is basically an upgraded F-91W with a well protected glass, so liking normal Casios but not square G-shocks doesn't makes much sense imo.

[Anonymous No.17642827]

>>17640176
I'm gonna assemble picrel and no one can stop me.

[Anonymous No.17642920]

>>17642809
Audemars Piguet can't compete with the sturdy and reliable all metal g-shock

[Anonymous No.17643151]

>>17637639
neither. this type of watch is atrociously ugly in 2023. I wouldnt have minded you wearing it 30 something years ago.

[Anonymous No.17643800]

>>17637639
A158W all day every day
the A168W looks like a toy.
it looks like a billboard trying to sell me something.
like i already have it, its on my wrist, why are you trying to sell me on features it has.

[Anonymous No.17643802]

>>17639081
damn, you didnt have to do that to him anon...

[Anonymous No.17644918]

>>17643151
Zoomers need not apply.

[Anonymous No.17644923]

i prefer the 168 because maximalism

[Anonymous No.17644939]

Plebeians.

[The damage that this photo made to contemporary menswear is unmeasurable No.17645055]

>>17644939
What even is that?

[Anonymous No.17645592]

OOGA BOOGA BEHOLD

[Anonymous No.17645687]

>>17645055
Looked it up, it's Ţ̶̨̛̦̫̟̙͇̠̘͓̹̗̹̫̙͚͙̭̞̟̾̃́̍̓͛͐͘h̷̛̛̙͐̄͆̔̌̈͊͌͊̀́͂͑͂̆̑̄̔͊͆͛̉͘͝͝͝e̵̛̤̰̜͕̺̜̫̺͖̒̃̇͐̒̐̈́͐̉̂̇̊̇͂͋̽͊̑͊̒͘̚͝͠ ̵̩͎̻̯̦͙̾̋̀͒̾̈́́͐̈͐̏͐̎͒̓̎͊̏͌̒̑̊̓̈́̚͜͝͠V̵̡̛̭̖̞̦̯̭̩̗̤̻̦͕̠͔̺̯̉͑̉͑̈́̀̆̆͋̂̉͛͂̂́͋͑͋̎̒̋̚͘͠ơ̷̧̧̝͉͎̖̜̗͙̥̝͚̖̼͔̤͚̙͉̰̫͓̖͇̟͌̋̓̓̄͂̈́̓̈́̎͑̐͗̾̍̕̚͠͝i̸̡̞̟͙̟̪̰̯̙̘̭̓̔̓̓̈́̕͠ͅd̷̨̧̯̫͔̻͊̄̒̑͠

[Anonymous No.17645793]

>>17645592
It would look great with a modernized MIP display.

[Anonymous No.17645800]

>>17645793
MIPS has better viewing angles but it sucks in every other way.

[Anonymous No.17645941]

>>17645800
Now that I think about it you're right, it's not worth the hassle.

[Anonymous No.17645954]

B640

[Anonymous No.17646502]

>>17645592
Pretty sure it's thinner than both the A158 and A168. Pretty neat. I think I'm gonna get the 1B variant. Picrel.

[Anonymous No.17646771]

>>17646502
I’d say go for it, the A1000D-7EF is the best purchase I’ve made from Casio desu

[Anonymous No.17646948]

Can I wear Casio if I'm a femoid?

[Anonymous No.17646958]

>>17646948
You SHOULD wear Casio if you are a woman - almost all femwatches, cheap or luxury, look like shit. At least Casio has that utilitarian vibe.

[Anonymous No.17646966]

>>17646948
Some of my female friends wear small fullmetal Casios like those >>17638660
, not to mention all the smartwatches that you can see on the wrists of the people in the streets, so yes.

[Anonymous No.17647013]

I bought a a168w. I don't care

[future wife No.17647022]

considering getting this one, it's 35€ rn, which sounds acceptable to me. i take recommendations on other casios if that one isn't any

[Anonymous No.17647563]

>>17637670
"SOVL" = can't see shit

get an electro luminescence backlight if you ever buy one of these watches. Tr

[Anonymous No.17647602]

Saw this watch today. Thought the unusual for a digital watch round shape was cool. Thoughts? I wish the dial was more minimal without all the text.

[Anonymous No.17647766]

>>17639000
Picked this up today because of (You).

[Anonymous No.17647822]

>>17639000
>>17647766