futuristic techwear?

[Anonymous No.17612220]

I love this kind of futuristic but functional aesthetic.

Where can I find jackets, shirts and pants that have this kind of vibe? When I search for "futuristic" I find a lot of cheap tacky clothing. Are there any designers who specialize in this?

[Anonymous No.17612224]

acronym

[Anonymous No.17612239]

>>17612224
a lot of their stuff looks surprisingly basic
do I have to look at their past collections for cool designs?

[Anonymous No.17612256]

>>17612239
i mean yeah, the more out there stuff usually sells out quickly and isn't available at retailers

[Anonymous No.17612258]

i love the j87-ws for example thats only available at their own webshop at the moment.

if you want futuristic but don't mind looking a bit costume-y/cosplay, HAMCUS might be the way to go

[Anonymous No.17612279]

>>17612220
But this looks tacky as fuck

[Anonymous No.17612308]

>>17612279
how is a minimalist monochrome shoe tacky

[Anonymous No.17612310]

>>17612220
the way ive been going for budget techwear is just getting a couple black cargo joggers and wearing other black clothes, like generic black tshirts, crewnecks, etc. Can pair that with long sleeve activewear underarmor type shirts. I have a generic black wind breaker too. It looks pretty basic so it doesn't stand out too much but it still has that "techy" vibe to it when the whole fit is black. Currently I'm struggling to find a shoe that goes well with everything else I have.

[Anonymous No.17612315]

>>17612308
not the anon you replied to, but imo really high contrasts tend to look tacky fast in fashion

[Anonymous No.17612317]

>>17612279
all futurism is doomed to look tacky, it's always retrofurutism in retrospect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvtxFFj6eDY

[Anonymous No.17612359]

>>17612308
How is that minimalist in any way?

[Anonymous No.17612423]

p.a.f

[Anonymous No.17612426]

>>17612359
>2 colors
>simple geometric shapes

looks pretty minimal to me
im no design or artist student so I might be using the definition loosly

[Anonymous No.17612485]

>>17612239
That’s the point. Acronym spends money, time, and effort into articulation and cutting-edge fabrics instead of looks. If you want to dress #techwear just use AliExpress. But with ACR you’ll gain breath ability, weather resistance, range of motion, durability, storage. It’s firm over function. You’ll be comfortable and not look like a Cyberpunk 2077 cosplayer. Shit will last you much longer too

[Anonymous No.17612490]

>>17612426
>high color contrast (literally black and white), black geometric blocks, gradients, vent dots, five different logos, leather, gloretex, plastic, shiny zipper, matte zippertrack
>minimalist

i'm not hating on the shoe, i own bambas myself but they're far from minimalist

[Anonymous No.17612511]

>>17612485
>. Acronym spends money, time, and effort into articulation and cutting-edge fabrics instead of looks.
Lmao if you actually believe this. Go to any acronym forum and you'll see how trash their shit is, the only thing they have going for them is marketing which is incredibly effective at making retards believe they are getting their money worth from a $1000 piece of chinese crap

[Anonymous No.17612518]

>>17612511
>Go to any acronym forum and you'll see how trash their shit is
lol what

[Anonymous No.17612532]

>>17612490
>but they're far from minimalist

what description can I use then for design like this?

[Anonymous No.17612552]

>>17612532
i'm not sure there's one simple term that you can google that would help you find more in that look, but i think if you enjoy this particular colorway of the salomons you might like machine56
i personally don't enjoy their stuff but it might be what you're looking for

[Anonymous No.17612571]

>>17612552
I am not that focused on the color I just like this look that I don't know how to describe. Futuristic? Sleek?

[Anonymous No.17612752]

>>17612511
>marketing
You mean the brand that literally has never done any advertising or marketing in the 21yrs of existence?

[Anonymous No.17612763]

>>17612752
That's part of their marketing you dumb shit. Even the packaging is just like a bag with nothing else because their 'brand' is about all that. Cutting corners to supposedly focus on the important things when their shit is just low quality chinese trash

[Anonymous No.17612765]

>>17612763
have any proof to substantiate your claim that >their shit is just low quality chinese trash

[Anonymous No.17612766]

>>17612763
LMAOOOO
dude, what if you just accept its out of your price range

[Anonymous No.17612803]

>>17612765
Literally any techwear forum, hundreds of verified users confirming low quality shit
>>17612766
I have no interest in their clothes whatsoever, I wouldn't even buy them for cheap

[Anonymous No.17612822]

>>17612803
I asked for proof, I want direct proof. How about a screenshot of a post, I would like to know the truth.

[Anonymous No.17612861]

>>17612763
Cringe and jealous. Ooo wow a cardboard box with some logos on it? That’s marketing! It’s the same as spending a crap ton of money where it goes to the “unboxing experience” and you have magnetic lids, printed inner boxes, and huge ad campaigns. Totally. Muh Acronym cardboard box that has clothes shipped in a giant plastic sandwich bag with a printer sheet detailing the specs of the item. Yep. It’s like getting a whole bunch of unnecessary accessories to pad out an item to make it feel more premium

[Anonymous No.17612939]

>>17612763
Holy cope. I don’t own any but I still know you’re wrong

[Anonymous No.17613024]

>>17612752
not that guy but they absolutely have done a lot of marketing or advertising

[Anonymous No.17613276]

very backwards. all over priced plastic

[Anonymous No.17613842]

>>17612239
>a lot of their stuff looks surprisingly basic
yeah. it is kinda the only techwear brand you can wear outside without looking like a fucking clown

[Anonymous No.17614044]

>>17612308
>minimalist
>with all that tacked on material and stitching
>monochrome meaning single color
>
please crack open a dictionary before you solicit opinions on your starter chinkcel core shoes next time you humongous retard lol

[Anonymous No.17614127]

>>17612220
stone island shadow

[Anonymous No.17614228]

>>17614127
Sisp has been ass for the past few seasons and now it’s dead anyways. Prefer regular SI myself as I just use it for basics anyways, and layer over with high tech stuff like Acronym

[Anonymous No.17614237]

Where are my Nemen chads at? Stone Island and CP Company are inferior Italian tech to NMN

[Anonymous No.17614304]

>>17614127
Man I'm in love with this aesthetic but can you actually wear this if you have to interact with people? People might legit avoid you thinking you are dirty.

[Anonymous No.17614360]

>>17612220
I hate that this is what's being pushed as "futuristic".
If I'm going to larp I want to look like a space biker, not some kind of gay garbage bag ninja.

[Anonymous No.17614435]

>>17614304
Just explain your shoes to them in an overly detailed, obsessive, autistic way. Only autists wear these anyways so it’s unlikely you’ll be interacting with other people

[Anonymous No.17614570]

Sold my J47 last year and mad I did. Got a J1A which is nice but holy hell the 47 is so incognito tech and has such a nice collar. They were cheap as hell and sat in almost all sizes for ages. It was an MIC/retailer piece so I gift it on the low but sadly sold it for low and now everyone who slept on it seems to want one and used prices are selling for way more than I paid. Pissed af

[Anonymous No.17615526]

bump

[Anonymous No.17615650]

Save your money and just buy reg Salomons. They look better in 95% of fits and situations. Yeah if you have money to burn maybe you can find the exact pair of Bambas you want but as someone who’s owned two pair (2 Low and High GTX) they’re so not worth it. But hey if you want people to think you love Stranger Things a lot then go for them
>daily rocking Salomon Advanced Odyssey Mid 1s in the “Kelp” cw

[Anonymous No.17616138]

>>17612571
Man I want these now, why you gotta post this

[Anonymous No.17616250]

>>17612220
I have these. not functional at all but surprisingly light. can't handle dirt or snow, literally can only be worn in the city.

[Anonymous No.17616251]

>>17616250
They can handle dirt no problem, they will just get dirty.

[Anonymous No.17616443]

>>17615650
i own, wear and love both regular salomons and boris ones but find myself wearing my bambas the most. i love that they look like they could be worn on hoth while providing regular salomon comfyness

hoka tor ultra (high and low) are still the better "techwear" related shoewear option though imo