[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 37 KB, 768x385, The-Matrix-Morpheus-Neo-Trinity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17580387 No.17580387 [Reply] [Original]

Sunglasses thread.
Post your favorite sunglasses.

>> No.17581019
File: 512 KB, 1080x824, oakley-gascan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17581019

>> No.17581088

>>17580387
Oakley gas cans

>> No.17581446

>>17580387
w2c?

>> No.17581503
File: 87 KB, 1200x900, jv5npbwgpow51.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17581503

>>17580387
Impossible to find though :(

>> No.17581718
File: 1.78 MB, 1170x2532, IMG_7951.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17581718

>>17580387
>current favorite sunglasses

>> No.17582455
File: 46 KB, 322x507, glassesnew.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17582455

This is technically a women's pair, but they look great from an angle.

>> No.17582463
File: 639 KB, 1500x1000, 8ec7ca67c83a67847168d1136eafe8ddaec5702f.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17582463

>> No.17582962

>>17580387
i believe sunglasses are a luxury item that are probably financially out of reach for most /fa/gs

>> No.17583109
File: 46 KB, 675x454, images (87).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17583109

>> No.17583176
File: 875 KB, 1200x628, 1653088603027052.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17583176

these are kino, would love to have them IRL

>> No.17583380
File: 42 KB, 1200x630, sunnies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17583380

I wear clip ons like this over my generic round wire frame glasses.
I am looking for one I can fucking flick up if anyone has any suggestions.

>> No.17583445

>>17582962
You ever been to a gas station?

>> No.17583565
File: 1.83 MB, 2497x2372, IMG_20230326_225013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17583565

Depsite all the new pairs I get these remain my favorites.

>> No.17584014
File: 301 KB, 600x536, 3fe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17584014

>>17583445
>gas station shades

>> No.17584034

>>17583176
Amahl Fahrouk, good friend

>> No.17584060
File: 301 KB, 1080x903, incredible.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17584060

>> No.17584079
File: 30 KB, 399x600, green tinted sunglasses.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17584079

>>17580387
When things look green that means that you’re in The Matrix.

>> No.17584097
File: 75 KB, 927x927, 11727392_3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17584097

>>17580387

>> No.17584112
File: 739 KB, 822x793, 1616810725955.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17584112

>> No.17584123
File: 101 KB, 900x600, 1640639815979.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17584123

>> No.17584538

>>17581503
oof, need these

>> No.17584549
File: 249 KB, 2400x1600, hana-bi-gun-seaside-still.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17584549

These are pretty kino but I probably wouldn't wear them irl

>> No.17584560
File: 58 KB, 1500x864, 51YhOinfkhL._AC_UL1500_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17584560

>> No.17584606

>>17583380
What frames are those?

>> No.17584622

>>17584549
yeah these just look good because kitano-san is based

>> No.17585278

Mykita. Paying $300-500 for “designer” glasses (Prada, Dior, Balenciaga) when they’re all made by the same Chinese supplier and look super tacky is just stupid. I can get good quality frames for 400 to 500 that aren’t mass produced in a factory. And if not Mykitas Oakley SI frames with the helo kit for the meme and practicality

>> No.17585944
File: 199 KB, 1080x1350, 1681867970144926.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17585944

>>17580387
anybody know what these glasses are? I can't quite make out the word on the front of them.

>> No.17585946

>>17585944
Nigga just use google lense. Took me 2 fucking seconds to find them on aliexpress

>> No.17585952

>>17585278
Dior glasses are actually high quality and are made in Europe, or at the very least used to be if it changed now. I don't follow these things anymore.

>> No.17586617
File: 837 KB, 2197x2528, 20230102_1137271.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17586617

>> No.17587815

>>17584060
Actually based

>> No.17587818

>>17585944
Looks like FENG, blue light filtering

>> No.17587826

who makes the best mirrored silver aviator under 300 nowadays?

>> No.17587849

>>17587826
What do you mean by best? Just get a pair from a decent brand that you like the shape of that looks good on you.

>> No.17587851

>>17587849
Yes, I suppose it was a subjective question. High quality. I have issues with many brands where the mirroring is rather cheap. There are also quite a few brands that make nice aviators but don't have many mirrored (silver) options, such as randolph. Might just give up and buy another set of ray bans.

>> No.17587869

What is decent brand for poor people?

>> No.17588078
File: 44 KB, 1200x960, carrera-1012S-GUUHO-56_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17588078

>>17587851
You can always get mirrored lenses installed, most places that sell glasses have a lab where they can cut a lens to fit into your shades. These for example >>17583565 looked like pic related when I bought them, I really liked the frame but I knew the yellow lense wasn't it, so I got the burgundy lens to match the accents on the frame.
>>17587869
Polaroid, if you're really poor AOFLY on aliexpress.

>> No.17588208

>>17584123
had a deja vu and thought this was my favorite diner in LA. turns it out it was filmed 5 minutes down the road from it
happy thursday anons :)

>> No.17588234
File: 31 KB, 473x183, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17588234

Mirrored boys like this

>> No.17588261
File: 395 KB, 493x589, win.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17588261

w2c

>> No.17589301

>>17588261
They're just generic round shades you dumb fuck

>> No.17589312

>>17589301
Yes retard and those are stupidly hard to find, all popular brands only make ugly almost round shapes, so w2c?

>> No.17589315

>>17589301
I know only ones I see are shitty ones from amazon I already own. I want a nicer pair.

>> No.17589325
File: 346 KB, 465x470, berlin.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17589325

Do I cop these?

>> No.17589332
File: 288 KB, 2982x2237, 20230123_150706[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17589332

>>17580387
Only Matusuda looks good on me; even splurged on the 599 USD Zeiss lenses; frames were ~900 USD. Good See Company in Venice has the best selection.

>> No.17589337
File: 149 KB, 1200x890, 59a02c336eac401c008b4a72[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17589337

>>17585278
avoid Luxottica
you will be fine

>> No.17589515

>>17581446
maker is blinde designs/richard walker, bought them many many years ago new and this thread just reminded me i have them somewhere at my parents' house
wonder if they're worth anything now

>> No.17589521

>>17589337
whats wrong with luxottica? my new ray-bans are pretty well made...

>> No.17589852
File: 162 KB, 1288x1078, ocutEPmmOX4HRQR8RFenoUHcw0hvk6_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17589852

What model of sunglasses are these? It's very hard to find the correct one.

>> No.17589867

>>17589521
>>17589521
nothing.
/fa/gs just like to bitch and they can't even afford them anyway.
yes, newer ones are not as nice as the older ones etc and they're expensive, but they're decent glasses and the classic models look nice.
haters gonna hate tho

>> No.17589912
File: 37 KB, 800x800, vermont_J01020125_main.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17589912

>>17580387