/wt/ watch thread

[Anonymous No.17566570]

Bubbling edition

> Poorfag guide: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

previous thread >>17565289

[Anonymous No.17566577]

>>17566570
The only good looking Grand Seiko.

[Anonymous No.17566580]

Imagine buying a soulless watch assembled by machine or some factory worker.

The only watches worth owning are ones you've built yourself.

[Anonymous No.17566582]

>>17566567
Islander x Hemel Hawkeye
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5w6OvsbOZg&t=14s

[Anonymous No.17566583]

>>17566580
How are you making your own movements?

[Anonymous No.17566591]

>>17566583
You can imbue soul into factory movements by hand finishing them yourself. If you really want you can build your own movements from scratch, but I don't have hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of CNC mills or the autism required to make tiny gears by hand, so it's a lot cheaper to just get something close enough and improve it.

[Anonymous No.17566596]

>>17566591
You sound like a fag.

[Anonymous No.17566597]

>>17566582
https://longislandwatch.com/islander-x-hemel-hawkeye-39mm-modern-flieger-with-black-dial-isl-203/

Why are the hands fucking blue now when on the video they're normal?

[Anonymous No.17566601]

>>17566596
I'm indeed gay, but I don't see how this is related to the point I'm trying to make.

[Anonymous No.17566605]

>>17566597
He points out in the video they are blue but in the youtube video it's hard to see it with his camera.

[Anonymous No.17566606]

>>17566605
Well fuck.

[Anonymous No.17566628]

>>17566580
Get off your high horse nigger. Also, see you at Milkshake?

[Anonymous No.17566635]

>>17566628
I don't know what that is, but I assume it's something faggy. If you didn't even put the hands on your watch, is it really even your watch?

[Anonymous No.17566636]

How do I remove the springbars of an F91
They seem impossible to take out

[Anonymous No.17566643]

>>17566636
Have you got a springbar tool? You might have to mangle the back of the strap a bit, they're on pretty tight and it can be hard to find the bar.

Worst case you can just snip it in half if you don't care about the strap, another spring bar is cheap. I say that, but then I spent 10 bucks on a couple of spring bars yesterday because I wanted a specific 2mm thick one.

[Anonymous No.17566647]

>>17566580
>>17566591

based. imagine wearing JEWelry some other guy prepared for you so you have more time to prep your wives bull

[Anonymous No.17566652]

>>17566636
you could try the dental floss technique if the springbar tool isn't working

[Anonymous No.17566668]

>>17566647
Well hey now, building watches seems like too much of a hobby to me. Far better to continue in mindless consumption. Who saw the new Rolexes? I can't wait to get the one with the balls on the dial, I've already put a down payment in with my AD, and I only had to take him out to lunch with the wife.

[Anonymous No.17566676]

Is San Martin based or cringe?

[Anonymous No.17566684]

>>17566676
asking zoomers on /effay/ if you should wear a certain watch is cringe. Wear what you like

[Anonymous No.17566685]

>>17566668
>Rolex with balls on the dial
too bad it's colorful balls and not a gianrt hairy nutsack

[Anonymous No.17566686]

>>17566676
They're not bad. The logo is better than most of the other chinks, the bracelets seem alright, really it just comes down to if you give a shit about "muh heritage" or if you're happy to own what is essentially a clone.

[Anonymous No.17566703]

>>17566684
All I wear is islanders.

[Anonymous No.17566705]

Hi, what do you think of my collection? I own a g shock and a few other shitter watches but didn’t include them in the photo. I posted here back in November if anyone remembers. Just added a few watches since then.

[Anonymous No.17566711]

What is this a copy of?

[Anonymous No.17566719]

>>17566705
Anon, I think you forgot something...

[Anonymous No.17566723]

[Anonymous No.17566724]

>>17566719
>>17566705
Kek

[Anonymous No.17566726]

>>17566724
Are square watches just an acquired taste? I can appreciate the movement and the general beauty of them, but I can't ever imagine myself wearing a square watch...

[Anonymous No.17566740]

>>17566726
I think they sit on the wrist more comfortably. Not for every one though

[Anonymous No.17566745]

>>17566726
>Are square watches just an acquired taste
Yeah. They feel different on the wrist, the proportions are all wrong.
That's why there are so many Santos/Tanks for sale second-hand: they may look great and be historically significant designs, but on-wrist they can be quite uncomfortable.

I think the mistake that a lot of people make is in sizing. Wearing a square/rectangular watch the same size as what you'd normally wear in a round watch will look positively huge, but when you size down, people complain it looks too tiny.

[Anonymous No.17566759]

Smart clasps are the future

[Anonymous No.17566768]

>>17566726
I wonder if square watches will make a comeback. I'm sure it'll happen at some point

[Anonymous No.17566769]

>>17566759
I actually don't hate this completely.
>pedometer
Sure, class it up by hiding it in the clasp instead of being an insufferable look-at-me smartwatch
>text and notification
Only if they can make the screen good enough to read a brief text on that little thing, but then you'd have to take the phone out of your pocket to text back or talk into your wrist like a government agent
>how much bitcoin you have
Who would need this information on their wrist?
>day and date
Makes sense for non day/date watches. Would be unecessarily redundant on a day/date watch
>have to charge and connect bluetooth
oh they still haven't solved that have they?

Overall it doesn't look like it would be too intrusive, but if you're an office drove trying to flex his junior level Rolex that double thickness clasp with a plastic protection case probably wouldn't work very well. They need to make that shit much thinner and with the current batteries I just don't see that happening.

[Anonymous No.17566771]

>>17566768
I don't think they were ever commonplace, as far as I'm aware square watches were always the unusual outlier for case shape.

[Anonymous No.17566774]

>>17566591
>hand finishing them yourself
Can I just coom on my watch and we call it a deal?

[Anonymous No.17566778]

>>17566771
seems like at some point they were more popular though, especially with women

[Anonymous No.17566779]

>>17566769
>>how much bitcoin you have
>Who would need this information on their wrist?
That's a commuting card in Japan. All the benefits of NFC payments while wearing a watch with a soul.

[Anonymous No.17566781]

>>17566778
>popular with women
literally who cares what women think. When 95% of watches made are round and 5% are square at their peak popularity with wealthy women, the shape cannot make a "comeback" when it was never actually popular anyway.

[Anonymous No.17566787]

>>17566769
It's a neat concept, it's interesting to think what they might be like 10 years from now.

[Anonymous No.17566788]

>>17566779
Oh that kinda makes sense. I forgot about this since I've never and probably never will use my phone to make an NFC payment. Thats a foreign concept to me; $10,000+ watch and needing to ride a bus or train to get to work. Neat idea but not something I'd ever use and I cannot imagine it being popular in the US for anything other than buying stuff through google wallet or apple pay. I just don't see many people slapping their phones against machines to pay for shit when I do go shopping for anything.

How is identity and other kinds of theft not rampant when every electronic device is trying to give away money to any scanner near it?

[Anonymous No.17566791]

[Anonymous No.17566794]

>>17566711
Citizen ani digi temp

[Anonymous No.17566795]

>>17566794
I can't imagine the thermometer on that watch would be very accurate. Your wrist temperature would throw off the reading, no?

[Anonymous No.17566796]

>>17566791
explain yourself

[Anonymous No.17566797]

>>17566778
>seems like at some point they were more popular though,
In the early days of watches, like before the 1950s, there were all sorts of experimental designs. Look at Cartier. Their whole thing is unusual case shapes. The watches themselves all have white, time-only Roman dials. It's the case shape that sets them apart.

Since then we've kind of settled on round as being the most intuitive and comfortable.

[Anonymous No.17566801]

>>17566787
Not crazy about the tech (yet), but I can see the purpose and am eager to see where it goes in the near future. How long before it will be the same size as a regular clasp? Interesting.

[Anonymous No.17566802]

>>17566795
You subtract your body temperature

[Anonymous No.17566808]

>>17566797
Yeah, and that's why Cartier needs to stop.

[Anonymous No.17566809]

new baby just arrived

[Anonymous No.17566812]

>>17566788
>How is identity and other kinds of theft not rampant when every electronic device is trying to give away money to any scanner near it?
It is but no one cares.

[Anonymous No.17566816]

>>17566791
What explorer is that, 36mm?

[Anonymous No.17566821]

35mm sounded like it might be too small, but I think this is fine on my wrist and want to be reassured that I'm right by strangers on the internet, please.

[Anonymous No.17566823]

>>17566724
tidy collection, I like a quare case.
>>17566809
Now THAT is hot, were you not tempted to go for any of the more exotic dial colours?

[Anonymous No.17566824]

>>17566795
Yeah the temp is inaccurate while you are wearing it. The instruction manual says to get an accurate reading take off the watch for 20 minutes. Its best to think of as a fun gimmick from when watch manufacturers where cramming any feature they could into quartz models to try and make something that stood out

[Anonymous No.17566825]

>>17566821
Its perfect. Wear it past your wristbone for proper vintage fit.

[Anonymous No.17566826]

>>17566823
honestly no, I hate the red and green dials with a passion
though I was almost seduced by the 150 years edition with the blue dial and white numerals
the white dial is sexy but it looked like a wall clock on my wrist

[Anonymous No.17566828]

>>17566824
Wouldn't it be more useful as an actual body temperature reading?

[Anonymous No.17566829]

>>17566828
Its not very accurate as a body temp reading either. That grill on the bottom is to provide airflow to the temp sensor

[Anonymous No.17566830]

>>17566769
Quick pay would be the only function I would use. Tracking of fitness and sleep wouldn't be useful to me because I don't wear a watch while I sleep and I wouldn't wear a Rolex while I'm working out in the gym. The other functions like having the date and notifications I could use my phone for just as easily.

It would be pretty funny to use my Rolex to pay for my coffee in the morning. But overall it seems kinda gimmicky
>>17566816
Yeah it looks like the 36. It's not mine though I just saw the pics online and posted here to see what you all thought

[Anonymous No.17566831]

>>17566821
Yeah man, I don't think 34mm is too small, as long as you haven't got massive wrists, pic related.

[Anonymous No.17566834]

>>17566829
If there's no way to make it effective for body temperature for the generic fitbit shit smartwatches I'd scrap that feature and save the time and money. Like, who the fuck wants to take their watch off and wait 20 minutes to see what the air temp is? That's retarded.

[Anonymous No.17566836]

i guess this is what that is? they attached the clasp of this thing to the rolex

https://luxon.store/en-us/collections/wena

[Anonymous No.17566839]

>>17566831
That 34mm watch on your wrist looks like a 40mm watch on mine.

[Anonymous No.17566846]

>>17566834
Maybe if you're camping and bored out of your mind

[Anonymous No.17566847]

if they could reduce the thickness and maybe incorporate it into a rubber strap or something i would 100% buy this. looks like it's only available in japan at the moment

[Anonymous No.17566853]

>>17566836
makes sense, probably what that plastic sheath thing is for. I bet it was done with a 3D printer

[Anonymous No.17566856]

>>17566839
I think everyone has a range, I think 36-39mm looks just about right on my wrist, my ally GMT is perfect. I've also got a Seiko Turtle which is 45mm, and that doesn't look ridiculous on me, so I think the proportions of the watch itself plays just as much a role as the case size.

[Anonymous No.17566857]

>>17566853
Looks more like a case for it, they're scared of it getting scratched up. I don't know why you'd add more bulk to an already bulky clasp though.

[Anonymous No.17566862]

why did montblanc give up on this FUCK

[Anonymous No.17566863]

>year of our saviour jesus h. christ MMLCXXLIII
>still wearing a shekel shackle

[Anonymous No.17566867]

Why do people who wear Rolex have tiny dicks? Including the women.

[Anonymous No.17566869]

>>17566821
I don't know how anyone can wear their watch that high. Does it not get in the way when you move your wrist up? Especially with that crown.

As for size, yeah, you're fine. The PRX has quite a high lug to lug because of the integrated bracelet, you're well within it. The dial looks a touch small that high on your wrist, but it's totally within the ideal zone when measured in the proper place, being ~56% of your wrist width.

[Anonymous No.17566877]

What's the best rolex I can buy for $1k?

[Anonymous No.17566882]

>>17566826
fair enough man, It looks great in black. Enjoy :)

[Anonymous No.17566883]

>>17566877

[Anonymous No.17566885]

>>17566834
Its a cheeky gimmick from a digital watch movement made before you were born, its not worth getting worked up over

[Anonymous No.17566886]

>>17566877
Probably this.

[Anonymous No.17566889]

Just got finished making a custom tool to lower the bezel height on my watch. Nothing beats making something your own.

[Anonymous No.17566895]

>>17566877
Go to your rolex dealer in your town and ask them.

[Anonymous No.17566903]

>>17566877
LOL

[Anonymous No.17566906]

>>17566882
thanks!

[Anonymous No.17566912]

>>17566889
how the hell does that work?

[Anonymous No.17566917]

>>17566809
Looks great. Have you picked up a strap for it yet?

[Anonymous No.17566919]

>>17566917
no I wanted to have it in hand before I started shopping - gonna start in person even if I end up buying online.

[Anonymous No.17566921]

>>17566883
I kinda want to buy the cheapest Rolex on Chrono24 and then flex it on here and call everyone poor for not owning a Rolex. I think it would be a funny gimmick

[Anonymous No.17566923]

>>17566895
Do you guys ever overhear exchanges like this when you go to the jewelry store? You're shopping for a watch or an engagement ring, trying to make a decision that's going to make a difference of thousands of dollars, then a white kid wearing FUBU jeans and a doo rag comes up and asks the saleperson if they have any cubic zirconia jewelry? I can see the humor in it but it kind of makes me sad.

[Anonymous No.17566927]

>>17566889
Why not just put it into a lathe and shave it down a few mm? lol

[Anonymous No.17566930]

>>17566912
Through a series of operations that I've worked out will save me roughly 1mm off the front of the watch. The tool lowers the inner piece the bezel insert sits on, and I have to remove around 0.6mm with grinding paste.

Overall, the watch is going from a chunky 13.5mm to ideally a more reasonable 10.8.

>>17566927
Because I don't have a lathe.

[Anonymous No.17566932]

>>17566930
post some pics, Im interested

[Anonymous No.17566952]

>>17566930
You save 1mm by shaving off 0.6mm and reduce the watch from 13.5mm to 10.8mm.

...... Okay.

[Anonymous No.17566956]

>>17566932
Here's my thrilling design document, totally to scale.

The back is just a replacement part, I could grind it down myself but the most I can save is 1.4mm that way due to the thickness of the backplate, so there's no point, I might as well just buy one and get it thinner. Aside from the piece the bezel insert sits on, everything else is just basic flat grinding with stones, sandpaper, and paste. The custom tool is just a washer ground down to the right dimensions to sit where the bezel insert goes, with a chamfer so I can only grind down, not sideways. I'll just swivel it around in the hole with some paste to take off material from the bezel.

I may actually end up taking more than this off, I'm still unsure how thin I can make the insert and ideally I want it pretty close to the glass.

>>17566952
Yeah, because I'm shaving down both the inner piece the bezel insert sits on, and the bezel insert itself. Plus the caseback is really thick, most of the saving is there.

[Anonymous No.17566959]

I’m sure I’ll get bored and stop posting pics soon but for now I’m enamoured

[Anonymous No.17566962]

IWC CHADS WHY DO WE KEEP WINNING

[Anonymous No.17566973]

>>17566962
Winning what?

[Anonymous No.17566976]

>>17566826
I like the reverse panda one.

[Anonymous No.17566977]

>>17566829
It should've had a heatsink caseback.

[Anonymous No.17566979]

>>17566976
that one is super cool, love the vintage look and styling with the brown leather strap
if I had like 10 watches I’d want that to be one of them, but this is gonna be my daily so I wanted something more modern looking

[Anonymous No.17566990]

>>17566979
Yours is fine as well, you can still spice it up with different straps.

[Anonymous No.17566993]

>>17566809
Nice EXIF data you got there.
Would be a shame if your constant boasting would lead to someone paying you a visit.

[Anonymous No.17566996]

>>17566993
You didn't get EXIF from that image.

[Anonymous No.17566999]

>>17566923
>FUBU

don't forget your meds, gramps

[Anonymous No.17567000]

>>17566962
>>17566973
>>17566990
sexo

[Anonymous No.17567003]

>>17567000

[Anonymous No.17567005]

>>17566996
>>17566993
I took care of that comment.
Guys cool it with the death threats on /fa/ of all places. Posting on 4chan is a privilage, not a right.

[Anonymous No.17567014]

>>17566999
I'm 34, but okay.

[Anonymous No.17567017]

>>17566956
be sure to post the before and after pics for us

[Anonymous No.17567024]

>>17567017
Yeah, I will do. I have a spare case if I totally fuck up any of the parts so I can use it as a direct comparison. I already made a bracelet for it a few threads back by destroying 2 perfectly good ones and sticking them together.

[Anonymous No.17567025]

>>17566993
4chan clears the EXIF data off any pictures before it uploads for over 10 years now, so you can't use it to doxx anybody anymore...

[Anonymous No.17567030]

>>17567014
And I'm 40+. How the fuck do you think about fubu when you imagine a young dude in a store.

[Anonymous No.17567036]

>>17567025
Plus I use an icognito tab when I post my images

[Anonymous No.17567040]

>>17566809
>>17566906
>>17567003
where’s the autist who keeps track of all the anons who actually own nice watches?

[Anonymous No.17567044]

How much does your watch weigh, and how much does your strap weigh?

Right now, my watch weighs 106g. Of that, 42g is the strap, so the watch itself is 64g. I'm curious what the ratio is like for other people, is 60/40 typical? Is 50/50 better?

[Anonymous No.17567049]

>>17567040
Probably got bored and moved on to cataloging anime catgirls

[Anonymous No.17567053]

>>17567030
I didn't think of shit, that was a real story.

[Anonymous No.17567057]

>>17567044
I've never even thought to check this.

[Anonymous No.17567058]

>>17567053
...told to you by your grandfather? FUBU basically pulled out of the US market in the early 2000s.

[Anonymous No.17567066]

>>17567057
I imagine most people don't. It's incredible how fucking hard it is to find information about weights and shit online.

Here's an example right, Seiko rotors. There are a bunch of factories producing fancy replacements for see through casebacks with stupid styling on them. Not one lists the weight of the rotor. Seiko don't even list it, unless it's hidden in some service manual you have to pay for. Is the weight required? Can I shave a few grams off it and it'll still rotate well enough to wind the watch? Nobody knows.

[Anonymous No.17567067]

>>17567058
Bruh I just meant that generic urban style of baggy ass jeans and oversized t-shirts and puffy vests and shit, don't overthink it.

[Anonymous No.17567071]

>>17567067
>Don't question the details of my highly improbable story, just accept it.

[Anonymous No.17567074]

>>17567066
here’s a question though:
who the fuck cares?

[Anonymous No.17567076]

>>17567066
I'd think an actual watch repair guy could answer questions loke that. Generally I'd think, to a point, you'd want about as much weight on the rotor as you could get without it making the watch feel cumbersome and weird. And without stressing any of the load bearing surfaces.

[Anonymous No.17567077]

I hate niggers and jews
Fuck niggers and jews

[Anonymous No.17567078]

>>17567071
What is improbable about some broke kid wanting to buy his girl a cheap cubic zirconia ring?

[Anonymous No.17567080]

>>17567066
I don't understand why people mod their Seikos anyways. Most of the time it just takes away anything that makes it unique and turns them into a homage watch. I saw one get posted with a swaped out bezel and jubilee bracelet to make it look like a GMT-master. It didn't even have a GMT hand to make the bezel useful. I think you're better off leaving it stock.

[Anonymous No.17567083]

>>17567077
But jews are everywhere in the watch realm, from the collectors up to the people making the watches.

[Anonymous No.17567087]

>>17567074
I do. Sure, it's a gram here, a gram there, but it all adds up.

>>17567076
Sure, but what's the ratio like? If an average person keeps does enough movement to fully wind their watch in X hours with a bi-directional rotor, what's happens if the rotor is half the weight? Does it take twice as long to wind? If 1 hour is enough to wind the watch, what does it matter if it takes 2 hours of wearing instead if you're wearing it all day anyway? How much weight can be removed before the rotor becomes worthless?

>>17567080
People mod seikos because they're cheap. What does it matter if some guy puts an ugly GMT bezel into a 200 dollar watch? As long as he isn't trying to sell it as a super rare pre-production factory one-off, what's the issue?

[Anonymous No.17567091]

>>17567087
>what's the issue?
I don't really take issue with it, I just find it silly and would never do it. If you want a GMT-master and can't afford one, just buy a homage like a Steinhart, don't hack up a perfectly fine Seiko. Just my opinion.

[Anonymous No.17567092]

>>17567058
>>17567078
>What is improbable about some broke kid wanting to buy his girl a cheap cubic zirconia ring?
The part where some broke kid in baggy pants knows the name cubic zirconia

[Anonymous No.17567093]

>>17567091
I mean, you can swap a bezel out in 2 seconds, same with a bracelet. If you can buy a 200 dollar watch and spend 50 bucks in parts to make it what you want, doesn't that make more sense than spending 500 bucks on an homage?

Personally I don't mod existing watches, the Chinese sell cheap cases that are essentially just the same shit they produce for microbrands only at 1/10th of the cost. It's not hard to put a cheap Seiko movement in one, because ETA movements are overpriced.

[Anonymous No.17567101]

>>17566636
Google it you absolute niggertranny, I literally did the same thing last week and it was a breeze

[Anonymous No.17567103]

>>17566883
Go for that square one from Japan, looks like a solid dress watch

[Anonymous No.17567105]

>>17567093
I guess that makes sense. I just think if you wanted a GMT-master on a budget you could get a homage that actually functions like one with a 4th hand. But if you're just looking to switch up the look of a cheap watch then modding might be a good idea. I still wouldn't do it. Maybe I would upgrade a crystal to sapphire or the bezel insert to ceramic, but I would leave the watch looking like the way it was designed.

[Anonymous No.17567109]

>>17567080
Honestly I wish there were more options for small classy gmts without a big rotating bezel. I don't know why they don't just do something like an explorer with a GMT movement in it with 24 hour indications on the outer edge of the dial, that way it's a tough simple watch that you can dress up if you want to but it can still track 2 time zones. Or just show your own 24 hour time.

[Anonymous No.17567114]

>>17567077
so do I anon

[Anonymous No.17567122]

what keeps luxury brands from making their watches 20atm waterproof?
the speedmaster is 5atm.
meanwhile cheap chink dress watches get 20atm

[Anonymous No.17567123]

>>17567092
If anyone would know about cubic zirconia it's poor people.

[Anonymous No.17567124]

>>17567122
Wow. You don't think the Chinese would lie about the capability of their products, do you?

[Anonymous No.17567128]

>>17567124
I went to my watchmaker and asked him if he could test it. He was interested as well and it was waterproof like they claimed.

[Anonymous No.17567130]

>>17567109
Sinn might be a good choice for you. They make some 356 models with a 4th hand to track a 2nd time zone, without the bulk of having a GMT bezel.
But you're right, there isn't much on the market for what you're looking for.

[Anonymous No.17567137]

>>17567105
I don't see the point in a GMT bezel on a non-GMT watch either, but maybe he just liked the look and doesn't use the bezel anyway. Bezel inserts are a pretty mild change, even swapping the whole bezel out isn't that big of a deal, you don't even have to open the watch.

>>17567109
I feel like the numbers would be messy on most dials. Maybe you could do a chapter ring like this and it wouldn't be too bad for a nice subtle non-bezel GMT movement, I'm surprised nobody makes one.

>>17567130
>adding another hand to the dial because you're too stupid to remember "add 3"
Amazing.

[Anonymous No.17567139]

>>17567105
>actually functions like one
>shitty eta desk gmt movement
No

[Anonymous No.17567148]

>>17567130
How tall is this watch?

[Anonymous No.17567150]

>>17567139
I didn't say it functions as good as one, just that it actually does what a GMT is supposed to do
>>17567137
>you're too stupid to remember "add 3"
you basically destroyed all GMT watches with this neat little trick

[Anonymous No.17567153]

>>17567148
Google is your friend

[Anonymous No.17567157]

>>17567044
Watch is 42 grams, straps are from 9 to 13 grams.

[Anonymous No.17567162]

>>17567148
I think that one is 15mm but I'm not 100% sure (it's not my watch). I think that one uses a Valjoux 7750 chrono movement which is on the thicker side.

[Anonymous No.17567167]

>>17567157
42g for an auto is impressive, I guess the case is pretty light.

[Anonymous No.17567171]

>>17567162
15mm for a watch without a rotating bezel is crazy. Hell, it's crazy even with one.

[Anonymous No.17567177]

>>17567123
No
1) name too long
2) it's shiny n shiiieeeeet ain't it? This oneofem FANCY stores, everything up in this mfin bitch must be real diamond, right cuz? Good LAWD that's a steal of a price right there

[Anonymous No.17567181]

>>17567177
fuck off with the racism

[Anonymous No.17567185]

>>17567167
It's 37mm and quite thin, about 9mm + the crystal, but it still feels solid.

[Anonymous No.17567189]

>>17567124
What about sub-$100 shitters like Casio casually throwing out 10 and 20bar?

[Anonymous No.17567190]

The Seamaster 300m in its natural habitat.

[Anonymous No.17567192]

>>17567181
HAHAHAHHAHAAAA FUCK OFF GAY NIGGER FAGGOT
SIEG HEIL HITLER DID NOTHING WRONG RACE WAR NOOOOW
NIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGER

[Anonymous No.17567193]

>Buying a swatch group watch

I'd rather get a reddit meme watch like Seiko than the embodiment of semitic watch making.
Funny how they paid Daniel Craig, Ed Sheeran and that Bosnian Jew Zlatan to make it seem like they naturally walk around with the plastic moonswatch.
Face it, your omega is produced by a childrens toy factory.

[Anonymous No.17567194]

>>17567181
Who said anything about race?
Poor people talk like that because of a lack of education
You're not conflating a specific race with poverty or lack of education, are you anon?

[Anonymous No.17567200]

>>17567190
Nice watch

[Anonymous No.17567201]

>>17567193
>swatch
Stopped reading there, but speaking of, has the moon watch hype died down yet? I might cop

[Anonymous No.17567205]

>>17567181
Racism is objectively right. Every none white nation needs to be culled for the good of humanity.

[Anonymous No.17567211]

>>17567201
>Stopped reading there
lmao that was literally the last word of his post. so you stopped reading at the end????
buddy I think youre retarded

[Anonymous No.17567212]

>>17567205
Based, amerimutts need to go first and the rest of the third world will crumble all on its own

[Anonymous No.17567214]

>>17567190
On a wristlet?

[Anonymous No.17567216]

>>17567211
But it's the third word in his post tho? I told you already I didn't read the rest

[Anonymous No.17567218]

>>17567205
retard

take that shit somewhere else, this is a thread for discussing watches, not to discuss your asinine views of what's "good for humanity"

[Anonymous No.17567221]

>mfw racism in a watch thread

[Anonymous No.17567223]

>>17567193
>buying any swiss kike watch
I can only respect Swiss watches made more than 50 years ago. The SECOND quartz hit the scene, the entire Swiss market became an absolute joke, and their pivot into "luxury" jewellery is an embarrassment.

[Anonymous No.17567229]

>>17567212
Death to America, Israel and niggers

[Anonymous No.17567230]

>>17567221
Just some anally devastated poorfag seething at what he can't have and trying to shit up the thread
Remember to report and ignore

[Anonymous No.17567237]

>>17567221
>>17567218

go back to plebbit if you want a sanitized watch discussion.
Race is factually relevant in watch threads.

Discussions about robbery, the appeal certain watches have to the negroid race, how Swiss kikes jew out hard earned shekels by manipulating the market.

[Anonymous No.17567240]

>>17567230
Cope, seethe and dilate, gay nigger tranny faggot.
Racism is based and hilarious.

[Anonymous No.17567241]

>>17567212
>PC claims this post was deleted
>phone shows that it’s still up
w-what’s going on, which one is it?

[Anonymous No.17567245]

>>17567237
>redditspacing
>e-every board is just like /pol/ right guys? That's what CNN said!!!! It's epic and based!!!1!1!1!
>telling others to go back
Like pottery

[Anonymous No.17567247]

>>17567230
>Remember to repor

Yes lets get those racists banned from this board already
I'm so sick of tired of 4chans blatant sexism, racism, transphobia, ableism, antisemitism.

Yall have your stupid orange sub to post that filth in already. Stop shitting up this board.
I'm one of the few women on this board and you will never appeal to my gender by being such incels.

[Anonymous No.17567251]

>catposting
>seethe
>based
>unhinged tranny obsession
I thought school was still in session for amerimutts?

[Anonymous No.17567256]

drank too much choccy milk at a watch convention and now my tummy hurts

[Anonymous No.17567258]

>>17567251
I'm euro

[Anonymous No.17567260]

I bought picrel on a whim to replace the broken strap on my f91w
Is it gonna look gay?

[Anonymous No.17567262]

>>17567251
imagine getting this ass blasted over some dumb lads talking dumb lad shit

[Anonymous No.17567263]

>>17567247
>Yall
You really need to go back
You will never be texan

[Anonymous No.17567267]

>>17567262
>points out simple facts
>asks very basic question
>AIIIEEEEE Y-YOURE SEEETHIIIIIIIING
?

[Anonymous No.17567272]

>>17567263
Im actually Norwegian if you are interested.
You will never get a woman like me if you keep up your racism

[Anonymous No.17567273]

>>17567267
poor baby

[Anonymous No.17567274]

>>17567272
I'm actually not interested
Now post real biological tits or ywnbaw

[Anonymous No.17567277]

>a discord raid
>in the fucking watch general of all places
Did some shitter get absolutely btfo’d somewhere in the last couple of threads or something?

[Anonymous No.17567278]

>>17567274
>Now post real biological tits or ywnbaw
Here's the thing though, racist. I don't have to have two X chromosomes to be consideren a woman. Even in your backwards country USA trans people are getting more and more rights.
We're here to stay. If you don't want it leave

[Anonymous No.17567282]

>>17567278
>he thinks I'm an amerimutt third-worlder like him
Kek last (You)

[Anonymous No.17567288]

>>17567277
Honestly I'm samefagging the whole time. I'm actually procrastinating writing my masters thesis and I'm trying to stir some shit. I'm simultaniously being racist, some tranny and someone who gets angry about racists.
As far as I can tell the only other 2 spergs arguing with me is the cat poster and one guy who's legit ass blasted about everything.

Gotta do my college shit now though so this "discord raid" is about to die

[Anonymous No.17567290]

>>17567260
The black will rub off in about 2 minutes, and it'll probably pull all your hair out, but I guess it could be worse.

[Anonymous No.17567298]

>>17567190
Nah it’s just the lens, I have a 7+ inch wrist. Looks perfect size a meter or two away.

[Anonymous No.17567300]

>>17567190
See >>17567193

[Anonymous No.17567303]

>>17567185
what the hell happened to seiko that they went from those to what we get now

[Anonymous No.17567307]

>>17567300
they are separate factories

[Anonymous No.17567308]

>>17567298
Sure buddy, the lens is making the watch look like the lug to lug is as wide as your wrist.

[Anonymous No.17567311]

>>17567303
The whole watch market went retarded. There was a point in the late 90s where all anyone was making was 46mm+ dinnerplates, it was wild. Now watches are coming back down to 42mm, we can only hope they'll get smaller in the future.

[Anonymous No.17567315]

>>17567190
this is widely considered to be the ugliest watch of all time fyi

[Anonymous No.17567317]

>>17567307
Omega tried fighting Swatch Group so they wouldnt release the moonswatch. They thought it would damage their reputation.
Papa Swatch Group told them to shut the fuck up and be nice little wage slaves for them

[Anonymous No.17567318]

>>17567303
Times change.

[Anonymous No.17567321]

>>17567311
Call me old fashioned, but I like a watch that's over 50mm wide

[Anonymous No.17567322]

>>17567190
D-did you turn your dogs into shoes

[Anonymous No.17567326]

>>17567307
ah shit buggy phone browser, fuck it.

>>17567308
Your trolling I hope, its a well know fact. Take a wrist shot and then look at your watch in a large mirror.

[Anonymous No.17567327]

>>17567321
to snort lines off it or why?

[Anonymous No.17567333]

>>17567317
What proof do you have that Omega fought with Swatch about not wanting them to release a plastic speedmaster? If anything it helped get their name out marketed to the public, it was the biggest watch release of the year. That's great advertising, people were lined up for blocks to get them.

[Anonymous No.17567335]

>>17567190
you could have at LEAST gotten a planet ocean 39.5mm
jesus, idiots on here. i swear man…

[Anonymous No.17567336]

>>17567322
no I'm on wheely shoes :)

[Anonymous No.17567337]

>>17567327
wrist presence

[Anonymous No.17567343]

>>17567326
>Your
Trolling is a art.

It doesn't matter what the mirror shows. That watch is too big for you. Maybe you just have really round wrists, because your "7 inch" wrists look about 50mm across.

[Anonymous No.17567347]

>>17567335
I thought about it, I had the last gen 300m and I really don't like the liquid metal bezels. In low light they are very hard to read, I'm waiting for Omega to update the PO and I'll add one to my collection.

They have already started with some of the PO models and Id prob buy the 43mm

[Anonymous No.17567348]

>>17567333
I will never afford a speedmaster and am trying to cope anon, please leave me alone :(

[Anonymous No.17567368]

>>17567343
From a 30cm away…..

[Anonymous No.17567371]

>>17567368
wow that sure is a fat wrist
not much point in wearing a nice watch unless you lose at least 50lbs

[Anonymous No.17567373]

>>17567343
Close up……. How do camera lens work?

[Anonymous No.17567375]

>>17567343
>Trolling is a art.

You cant even spell you faggot

[Anonymous No.17567377]

what brown strap works best with a black dial?

[Anonymous No.17567379]

>>17567368
looks good on you bro

[Anonymous No.17567388]

About to order parts to build my own watch.
I'm basedjacking all day about this.
Have a clear vision how it should look and it will be completely unique

[Anonymous No.17567389]

>>17567343
and it's >an art
not a......
the sec you start picking your and you're you out yourself, I didn't know I was writing a report for work.

>>17567371
nah maybe your right, how does your Seiko wear for a ref?

[Anonymous No.17567392]

I don't get Omega.
What's the appeal? All of their watches look over designed and borderline "fashiony".

[Anonymous No.17567394]

>>17567388
I know you're just being a cunt, but making your own watch is fun.

[Anonymous No.17567396]

>>17567392
The "appeal" is they paid a lot of money for ads, so all the boomers want the new Bond watch.

[Anonymous No.17567397]

>>17567392
in general they're well made these days, i would say they are better than rolex in the $4k-$6.5k range.

[Anonymous No.17567402]

>>17567394
I'm actually being serious.
I figured using that image will make it seem like Im taking the piss but I actually feel like a numale about to order his first Nintendo Switch.

Are you the guy who makes your own watches?
Anything I should keep in mind?

[Anonymous No.17567403]

>>17567392
Speedy is fashiony? You what? Omega is all about the Speedmaster. I would call the rest of the range even fashiony.

I'll answer your question. I know you have not had one in your hand. If you had you would get it. Go to a Omega AD and handle the watches.

[Anonymous No.17567412]

>>17567377
Something rich and warm.

[Anonymous No.17567414]

>>17567397
>i would say they are better than rolex in the $4k-$6.5k range.
Yeah not shit. There are 0 Rolex in the $4k-$6.5k range.

[Anonymous No.17567416]

>>17567377
Any of them will look good, black dials can go with any strap

Check out Holbens, they have a good selection and I've ordered a bunch of straps from them
https://holbensfinewatchbands.com/

[Anonymous No.17567419]

>>17567402
Well, it helps if you get parts that go together. Pick up some Rodico, and some finger cots so you don't get greasy finger prints all over your nice new parts, and so you can pull the grease off if you do. They now make little foam q-tips that soak up rubbing alcohol like sponges so you can clean stuff off if you do anything messy, regular q-tips leave cotton shit everywhere. The chinks sell movement holders for like 5 bucks and they can be useful, a crystal press is good as long as you remember the cheap ones aren't straight, so you have to push a little bit then rotate the watch a bit to get the crystal to go in straight. You can get all this shit from china aside from the Rodico.

[Anonymous No.17567420]

>>17567403
The Seamaster is fashiony.
>these useless waves on the dial
>that smooth impractical bezel
>that over designed bracelet
This was obviously not originally designed as a tool watch but as some fashion accessory.

[Anonymous No.17567423]

>>17567392
I wanted the James Bond watch when I was a kid, now I'm an adult and I've owned a few Omegas and I like their designs and the brand history. The only annoying part of liking Omega is the constant comparison of Rolex you see online from people. There's the Rolex fans who shit on them all the time and the Omega fans who insist they are better. You don't see the same shit flinging with other luxury brands. But it's only really in the online space that you experience that so it's easy to ignore.

[Anonymous No.17567424]

>>17567419
>Rodico

Great tip, I'll keep that in mind.
The case I want to order already comes with a crystal in it

[Anonymous No.17567429]

>>17567420
Oh sorry, everything much be a Sinn (tool watch, a "real" tool watch), the 300m has kept the same design DNA for near 30 years now. If Omegas design lineage was like Tags then I'd agree with you.

Fashiony and design elements are not the same thing.

[Anonymous No.17567432]

>>17567424
Sure, but you never know if you're going to keep it. My watch came with sapphire, but it's too thick, so I bought another one. Or you could decide you'd rather have AR coating, most stock crystals don't have it. You can use them to take out bezel inserts, reattach bezels with tight gaskets, or you can use them to push on snap back cases when somebody needs a battery change, and they're not very expensive.

Rodico is great when it comes to fitting hands, you can use it to both hold them without any real fear of doing any damage with a toothpick, and you can use it to clean them of all the marks you made trying to fit them so they look pristine. And you can use it to take all the little pieces of dust off the dial that invariably stick to it in the half a second you pull it out of the case for. And unlike most Bergeon premium watchmaking junk, it's cheap.

[Anonymous No.17567437]

>>17567368
Jaundiced looking motherfucker might want to ease off the booze there buddy

[Anonymous No.17567439]

>>17567432
Alright you got me convinced.
How much did you spend on your self made watches?

[Anonymous No.17567443]

Here's my problem with Omega:
They don't know how to make timeless designs.
>Rolex DJ, OP, Explorer or Submariner
>most Cartier
>that GS in the OP
>those Zenith barrel-shaped chronographs,
>IWC Pilots
These are timeless imo. They won't look like they're from the 2020s in 20 years. Even Panerai somehow gets it right sometimes.
Omega? They always look like fashion trendy accessories that will age poorly.
I'm a man. I like timeless shoes, jackets, shirts and watches. I don't want to spend 8k on a watch that will look dated in a few years.

[Anonymous No.17567448]

>>17567437
I'm Asian -_- I think I'll live.

[Anonymous No.17567452]

>>17567414
but, there are

[Anonymous No.17567453]

>>17567439
I mean, it all depends on what you want. I'd say it's reasonable to do a first build from 150-250 bucks. You might be able to get away with 100 if you know what you want and you already have some tools.

As a basic benchmark, you can get an NH35/36 for about 30 bucks. You can get a watch case for about 30 bucks, with sapphire. You can get a dial for about 30 bucks. You can get some hands for about 10 bucks. Stick a 5 dollar nato on it, and you're done for cheap. Get a different watch case and you can get a bracelet with it for 40-50 bucks. Get a bracelet elsewhere for 20-30 bucks.

My bracelet was 90 bucks, because it's a mash up of 2 different ones and the case I'm using has some funky proportions. If you're using something more standard, you'll spend a lot less. My dial, movement, and hands were all in the above price range.

[Anonymous No.17567454]

>>17567437
Nice watch content, guy post watch and you poor fags have to have a go at something. You projecting a bit?

[Anonymous No.17567467]

>>17567453
Thats about as much as I planned. I have a budged of $500 but that includes getting tools as well.

[Anonymous No.17567492]

>>17567443
They have some classic and timeless designs like the De Ville line and the Constellation line. But they don't get nearly as much spotlight as the Seamaster and Speedmaster watches. I don't think the Speedmaster will age poorly because it's so iconic and collectable, plus it looks good with any strap you put on it.

[Anonymous No.17567516]

>>17567443
>I'm a man.
The fact that you felt the need to add that suggests you yourself doubt it.

KYS, troony

[Anonymous No.17567526]

>>17567137
>add 3
>Gmt-3 is south American time zone primarily

Mortadello is that you? By the way if you are 7, 9, 11, 13, 14 etc odd hours from gmt it isn't quite as easy to always do the math in your head as quick as a couple of hours.

[Anonymous No.17567529]

>>17567492
Thats a really pretty watch and I like it. No way I'd pay the price they're asking though.

[Anonymous No.17567533]

>>17567452
Cool I want to buy one in the next month. Is this possible yet?

[Anonymous No.17567545]

>>17567492
The day windows is horrible imo

[Anonymous No.17567547]

>>17567545
What's wrong with it?

[Anonymous No.17567548]

>>17567526
I don't really find it much of an issue, but then I'm usually only interested in another timezone early in the day, where military time always makes the conversion trivial. If you're frequently trying to add 11 at 5pm or so, I guess that's more work. You have to go 17, 28, 4am.

[Anonymous No.17567552]

>>17567547
>What's wrong with it?
It's not at 3 and there's no cyclops over it.

[Anonymous No.17567553]

>>17567533
nice try, but oysters are readily available

[Anonymous No.17567555]

>>17567412
Good guess
>>17567416
What do you think?
>>17566917
It is done

[Anonymous No.17567557]

>>17567552
>It's not at 3 and there's no cyclops over it.
That's a good thing.
>>17567547
The cut out.

[Anonymous No.17567560]

>>17567552
t. The man with no taste whatsoever.

[Anonymous No.17567565]

>>17567423
>But it's only really in the online space that you experience that so it's easy to ignore.

This. People whose brains have been rotted by spending their entire lives online have no grasp of anything other than completely binary viewpoints.
Something is either the very best thing ever or it's the worst. If anyone says they like something you don't like, they are pure evil and must be drowned out with the most furious shitposting.

[Anonymous No.17567570]

>>17567529
https://youtu.be/hWFOXieYIhw
Here's some closeup shots of it, I think it's really pretty. My biggest issue with it is the 40mm size, I think that's too big for a dress watch. They offer smaller De Ville watches in 36mm and 39mm, but that version with the blue linen dial only comes in 40mm.

[Anonymous No.17567572]

>>17567552
>cyclops
OK grandpa
>not at 3
Thats an improvement, the date on the dial should by symmetrical but at 3 it is vertically symmetric, at 6 it is horizontally symmetric. At 4 it is neither and looks like shit.

[Anonymous No.17567575]

>>17567545
I like the 6'oclock date window more than the standard 3'oclock position on most other watches. It's more symmetrical.

They offer a no-date version as well

[Anonymous No.17567577]

>>17567555
Looks good man, enjoy

[Anonymous No.17567604]

about to buy this what am I in for?

[Anonymous No.17567605]

>>17567555

[Anonymous No.17567608]

>>17567604
>what am I in for?
Owning an ugly watch

[Anonymous No.17567609]

>>17567604
A lot of old guys asking if its a rolex, and them sharing stories about how they own a rolex.

[Anonymous No.17567612]

>>17567604
Regret.

[Anonymous No.17567619]

>>17566570
God that is an incredibly sexy GS
Am I being Seikopilled?

[Anonymous No.17567620]

>>17567619
It's the grand seiko cumrag.

[Anonymous No.17567623]

>>17567619

[Anonymous No.17567625]

>>17567623
This image has been posted twice and I don't get it. Grand Seiko makes superb watches, what does Costanza have to do with it?

[Anonymous No.17567627]

>>17567604
dude just buy a 1926

[Anonymous No.17567633]

>>17567625
ISHYGDDT

[Anonymous No.17567634]

>>17567625
GS make well finished watches that will look like shit in a few years if you actually wear them more than once a month, with some of the worst bracelets on the market. And they're all too bulky. Spring drive is cool though.

[Anonymous No.17567635]

>>17567634
They're stainless like the rest of them? And if after a few years its showing wear just replace the bracelet? Also, I thought they made standard 38mm watch cases

[Anonymous No.17567639]

>>17567635
The problem isn't that they're stainless, it's that mirror finishes and zaratsu polishing wear fast. A brushed watch will obviously look better for longer, because a fingerprint or some small scratches won't ruin it. The bracelets are junk out of the box, and there are no ways to make them better.

[Anonymous No.17567645]

>>17567625
I didn't really mean anything by it. I'm a big Seiko fan. I just thought it was a funny pic of George dressed up Japanese and Seiko is Japanese. I didn't intend any deeper meaning lol

[Anonymous No.17567648]

>>17567639
So they're designed for wealthy businessmen who will exposed the mirror finish to their silk shirts and some kid on a Chilean speaker wire forum says the finish might wear over several years if you wear it every day? What am I missing here?

[Anonymous No.17567674]

>>17567648
>will exposed
Sure you aren't Chilean?

[Anonymous No.17567677]

>>17567674
>he made a typo!

[Anonymous No.17567691]

It's a shame that unlike with knives there basically aren't any watches with a stonewash finish. I love that look. Sure it's not all woooo shiny zaratsu polished n shiet, but it's rugged and doesn't show scratches (as they're just one scratch among a sea of scratches that make up the finish)

[Anonymous No.17567696]

>>17567691
There are of watches with a blasted finish

[Anonymous No.17567714]

I'm looking for a casual daily/sports watch for around ~100-150e. Was looking at some of the cheaper g shocks, but i am kinda lost.
I already have a tissot visodate with leather sraps but i can rarely wear it due to it being too fancy for casual streetwear. i'm also a 5.5'' wristlet.

> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

[Anonymous No.17567716]

>>17567714
Casio A700
A500
A1000
F91W
Or some cheap citizen Chandler eco drive

[Anonymous No.17567718]

>>17567714
G-Shock GW-M5610U
works well on smaller wrists, but I'm not sure about wrists that small

[Anonymous No.17567726]

>>17567714
Gshock 5610u
Will fit fine on your wrist

[Anonymous No.17567728]

>>17567718
wrist for reference. initially i was considering something like the GA-2100-1AER, but not so sure anymore.

>>17567716
not a big fan of the f91w aesthetic personally, but will look at some citizens

[Anonymous No.17567731]

>>17567691
blasted/muted finishing is fairly common among german watch brands. sinn, damasko, muhle glasshute among others

[Anonymous No.17567738]

>>17567714
Baltany makes a bunch of 36mm feild watch models, some automatic some quartz, size is perfect for you and they are pretty standard traditional field watch designs. Yes the quality is fine. Only comment is i would avoid the leather nator strap (1 piece strap) options because they make the watch sit kinda high up over your wrist. The two piece straps are fine.
https://aliexpress.us/item/3256802950394082.html
https://aliexpress.us/item/3256805216698815.html
https://aliexpress.us/item/3256802878319522.html
They have some other interesting models too if you poke around their store.

[Anonymous No.17567743]

>>17567738
*leather NATO strap
Fuck i cant type

[Anonymous No.17567747]

>>17566570
what would be the best first Omega watch? I was thinking Aqua Terra, I don't really like the looks of the Speedmaster Moonwatch.

[Anonymous No.17567758]

>>17567747
The Aqua Terra is a fine watch. You'll enjoy it.

[Anonymous No.17567761]

>>17567604
Laughs.
A ton of them.

[Anonymous No.17567775]

>>17567728
those visodates are 42mm right?
on paper, G-Shocks are bigger but because of the way the lugs and strap are shaped, they wear smaller than their specs make you think
my wrists are about 6.25" and I personally think it looks fine, but I'm sure others would disagree

[Anonymous No.17567807]

god it’s just so fucking HOT

[Anonymous No.17567815]

Do you guys ever find anything good in pawn shops? Once in a while I go to the pawn shop here to see what they have and they always have the whackest ass watches I've ever seen in my life. I can't even recognize what they are.

[Anonymous No.17567824]

>>17567815
The 6 I've been to flat out said they sold the last of their watches on eBay at a loss because no customers ever came in to buy watches. I'm semi-rural though, so mostly antiques and other old-people shit, and cheap tools from HF. They refuse to bring any watches in and had zero watchmaker jeweler references I could go shop at. But yes, that 3-5 remaining watches of sadness including fake MK, and other pop brands nobody wants for more than $10 but they had $200 price tags on them.

[Anonymous No.17567826]

>>17567738
I like the baltany watches but why do they have to be so fucking thick?

[Anonymous No.17567832]

IWC pilot 36 or BB36?

[Anonymous No.17567846]

>>17567832
>IWC all the way

[Anonymous No.17567854]

You guys keep all the boxes and shit your watches come in? Or the tins your g-shock and casios come in? i'm moving and i'm realizing how much shit has just been accumulating but it feels almost wasteful to toss some of this stuff desu

[Anonymous No.17567856]

>>17567854
Be like Archieluxury and catalogue each one of your boxes in detail. It comes in handy when you get robbed.

[Anonymous No.17567891]

>>17567375
>>17567389
newfags spotted. trolling is a art is a classic.

[Anonymous No.17567937]

>>17567747
i like mine a lot. runs really well. the bracelets don't feel that great tho, i prefer the rubber

[Anonymous No.17568003]

Is there anything else that has more soul than this?

[Anonymous No.17568062]

>>17567891
I wish I was a newfag, I have been here for 15 years. The only good thing to come from /wt/ is when it was on /g/ and I saw the BTC threads when it was £3ish, that was life changing.

Trolling is retarded as well, how anyone enjoys it I will never understand and 99% it's trolls trolling trolls or anons know its trolls but the message anyway on the off chance. Trolling is an art I cringe.

[Anonymous No.17568070]

Why is marc such a filthy parasitic kike?

[Anonymous No.17568072]

>no more celini
Fuck

[Anonymous No.17568083]

>>17568072
They just renamed it 1908

[Anonymous No.17568088]

>>17568083
Looks way better than the cellini too.

[Anonymous No.17568092]

>>17568003
literally any other watch, because this is the most soulless piece of metal I've seen

[Anonymous No.17568096]

>>17568088
It's alright. Too safe imo.
I wish Rolex used the Cellini line to make some fun watches like the King Midas.

[Anonymous No.17568097]

>>17568092
>metal
Hey man, that's all plastic construction with a thin coat of chrome paint. The strap is metal, I guess, and maybe the battery contacts.

[Anonymous No.17568101]

>>17568083
The dial is too simple for my taste.

[Anonymous No.17568105]

>>17568101
I think it could do with some texturing on the sub dial or something, but it's better than that old one. That's too busy for the modern day.

[Anonymous No.17568110]

>>17566711
Humm... link?

[Anonymous No.17568117]

>>17568110
You don't know about aliexpress? Just type that into the search bar.

[Anonymous No.17568126]

>>17568117
I did, it doesn't show

[Anonymous No.17568132]

>>17567815
I check the local online flea market for a vintage Seiko from time to time.

[Anonymous No.17568170]

>>17568083
The hands are fucking moronic. TERRIBLE.

[Anonymous No.17568210]

ok faggots, new thread
>>17568209
>>17568209
>>17568209
>>17568209
>>17568209

[Anonymous No.17568222]

>>17568003
incredibly based
Be careful adjusting the end band because I accidentally bent mine. It works ok but it takes an extra effort to get it to click in

[Anonymous No.17568855]

>>17567272
>>17567278
as a fellow norwegian i say to you, please leave (my country)