/wt/ - watch thread

[Anonymous No.17551689]

E6B edition

> Poorfag guide: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

previous thread >>17550783

[Anonymous No.17551694]

[Anonymous No.17551697]

[Anonymous No.17551699]

>>17551694
Or I can just use a fucking calculator and not have a massive bezel on my wrist like a retard.

[Anonymous No.17551701]

[Anonymous No.17551702]

[Anonymous No.17551706]

[Anonymous No.17551707]

[Anonymous No.17551710]

[Anonymous No.17551712]

[Anonymous No.17551713]

Pulled the trigger and ordered one from the US since you can’t get them in Europe (you can get the successor but I want that damn fish). Finally getting into watches again after selling my Apple Watch. Now I’ll save up for a submariner

[Anonymous No.17551715]

[Anonymous No.17551717]

[Anonymous No.17551721]

These "how to use unecessarily complicated watch" infographs are kinda neat but at the same time nobody will ever remember any part of them even if they own the watch and practice it a few times intentionally. When you have a 12 step process to roughly estimate ground speed, nobody will ever use it to estimate ground speed.

[Anonymous No.17551731]

I feel as if the Jerry Seinfeld - Bretling connection isn't brought up nearly enough

[Anonymous No.17551734]

>>17551721
An entire World War was fought using something like it, everything from flying bombers to artillery fire control. Can’t be that hard to memorize

[Anonymous No.17551737]

>>17551713
ummmmm, you do know bill gates wears one of those right sweetie?

[Anonymous No.17551739]

>>17551721
I get your point but I don’t think it’s necessarily about the actual use case but more about the “ability to” aspect. You’ll rarely find yourself in the position of having to build a fire, for instance, but almost everyone knows how to. It’s more of a cultural-heritage-skill kinda thing, related to horology of course. Don’t know if that analogy makes sense and I also find it completely obsolete. But diver bezels are still movable as well and fewer than 1% of those ever see anything betont the depth of shallow swimming pools.

[Anonymous No.17551741]

>>17551737
Why should I worry about that. It’s great value for money. Not that I care about what billionaires are doing with their money but if he’s going for understatement, all the power to him

[Anonymous No.17551746]

>>17551721
The real problem with this piece of junk is that what's hard to begin with is keeping track of orders of magnitude, which the dial just makes more difficult.

They really try and come up with stupid ideas for how you'll use the watch. Like you need to pay a 15% tip on an 80 dollar meal? Well, in the time it takes you to do your stupid dial, I've already done (80/10)+(80/10/2) in my head and got to 12. If you're doing anything more complex, just pull out a calculator app, it'll be faster.

>>17551739
>But diver bezels are still movable as well and fewer than 1% of those ever see anything betont the depth of shallow swimming pools.
A diver bezel is useful for timing things. Say you need to check on something in 10 minutes, you set the bezel in half a second by aligning 2 points, the 0 on the bezel and the current position of the minute hand. Sure, a chrono works too, but they're typically bulkier like that dinner plate, and the hands can be obscured. Pushers can get gunked up, it's possible for you to reset them. I will say a slide ruler is slightly more useful on a chrono than a dive bezel, though. You'll probably never use either of them anyway.

[Anonymous No.17551750]

>>17551746
I mean sure, you could use it like that but if I’m supposed to go through this procedure and then attend to my watch every minute or so, having to manually check the time, I might as well try to remember “okay, so I’ll have to leave in 10 minutes, that means when the big hand meets that dot I’m off”. Doesn’t seem insanely practical to me and who wouldn’t just use their phone nowadays. I know that people bring this up and technically it does seem more convenient and easier to pull off but in the end, it’s just a “hey, I could do this with my watch”-thing that in the end no one will use either

[Anonymous No.17551753]

I play DCS and I collect watches. Yet I don't have a pilot watch. Correction, I do have a DW5600.
Some candidates to get/save up on:
>I have a 7A28, but it's the wrong model (Bishop), SADF and RAF used different references, I'm not aware of any air-force issuing the Bishop
>Sea-Gull
>Poljot Shturmanskie (I have a Strela, but it's busted)
These are the affordable ones. The ones that'll need some moderate to serious saving up:
>Breitling Pluton 2100 (Yugoslav Air Force)
>Heuer Montreal (Hungarian People's Army Air Force)
>Orfina Porsche Design Chronograph 1 (you nerds should know this one)
>something Lemania 5100, like an Omega, Sinn or Heuer
Suggestions?

[Anonymous No.17551755]

>>17551750
They look cool you fuckin dork.

[Anonymous No.17551756]

>>17551750
I use my dive bezel on a daily basis to time food and shit because my oven barely makes a noise when it's done and sometimes I don't hear it with headphones on. Sure, I could try and remember "okay, I put the food in at 12 past 3", but with a bezel I don't have to remember shit. When I think enough time has passed, or I'm close to my food being done, I check my watch. I'm usually in the ballpark, and checking the watch lets me know "oh, okay, I've got another 2 minutes until it's done". I'm not checking back every minute, and if I had to leave at, say, quarter past 9 I'd just remember the time so a bezel would be useless anyway.

[Anonymous No.17551757]

>>17551689
>>17551694
>>17551697
>>17551701
>>17551702
>>17551706
>>17551707
>>17551710
>>17551712
>>17551715
>>17551717
You'd have to be a total egghead to memorise all this stuff. The average person would have to carry around a manual with instructions. Or just use your phone like a regular person.

How many Navitimer owners do you think actually use the slide rule at all?

[Anonymous No.17551758]

Can someone recommend a watch like this? I'm okay with quartz, I just love the simplicity of this and I only paid $20 for it like 15 years ago.

[Anonymous No.17551760]

>>17551758
just buy another one if you liked it so much

[Anonymous No.17551762]

>>17551760
Long discontinued, I can't find it anywhere.

[Anonymous No.17551763]

>>17551758
There are about a million watches that look like that, and you can pay anywhere from 20 bucks to 20k for one. Personally I'd prefer something a little fancier in a dress watch, like a Seiko Presage.

[Anonymous No.17551765]

>>17551762
I'm sure you could find one on Ebay or Chrono24 if you hunted for it long enough. And if not, just get a different quartz Casio

[Anonymous No.17551773]

>>17551755
I never said they didn’t and had you followed the conversation you’d know that you illiterate fuck with the attention span of a goldfish

[Anonymous No.17551775]

>>17551756
Maybe I’ll have to try that. Guess it can’t hurt and it might even teach my brain to estimate time more precisely

[Anonymous No.17551778]

ive found it, the perfect watch

[Anonymous No.17551779]

>>17551753
Smiths PRECISTA MISSION TIMER PRS-56
https://www.timefactors.com/collections/precista/products/precista-mission-timer-prs-56

[Anonymous No.17551782]

>>17551765
>>17551763
Even on Casio's website, they just don't exist. There some almost similar with a resin case instead of a metal, no date window. Its just not the same and I regretfully have a scratch on the crystal. I may try to replace just that.

[Anonymous No.17551783]

>>17551778
Seiko did it better

[Anonymous No.17551788]

>>17551731
>his 17 year old girlfriend and wife was a breitling fan too

[Anonymous No.17551793]

>>17551779
I really love this style of bezel, I wish I could get one in a smaller form factor.

Which means probably paying someone to make one for me. You'd think it wouldn't be that hard to get someone to just laser engrave some stainless steel or something and then cut it out into an insert shape, but nobody fucking does it.

[Anonymous No.17551801]

>>17551713
Got mine with the fish off of vinted

[Anonymous No.17551808]

>>17551782
Swapping out a crystal isn't too tough, and you could get a nice sapphire one from china for a few bucks.

[Anonymous No.17551810]

>>17551753
Tutima was the official watch brand of some NATO Air Forces and several of their watches use the Lemania 5100. You can find some in decent condition in the $1500-$3000 range.

[Anonymous No.17551822]

>>17551783
yeah but this is 50$

[Anonymous No.17551827]

>>17551808
Not sure how to do that; I just got a cheap watchmakers kit that included (among other tools) what I think is a caseback tool; its what I just used to snap a few cases closed after swapping batteries. If the crystal uses a special tool I'm not going to buy it to swap out 1 crystal.

[Anonymous No.17551831]

>>17551827
If it's one of those plunger things with heads you can change out, you can use it for crystals. It's not ideal, but it'll work and screw down crystal installers are way more expensive.

[Anonymous No.17551855]

>>17551689
>>17551697
>>17551701
>>17551702
>>17551706
>>17551694
>>17551707
>>17551710
>>17551712
>>17551715
>>17551717

[Anonymous No.17551858]

>>17551855
got rid of cursor. made this just because you're annoying

[Anonymous No.17551863]

>>17551831
yeah I assume one of the nylon bits could make it work, I just have no idea how I'd get the old bezel and crystal off.

[Anonymous No.17551866]

Fuck it, I’m getting one

[Anonymous No.17551872]

>>17551866
i held one recently. it unironically feels like a cheap piece of plastic, just like any other swatch watch

[Anonymous No.17551875]

>>17551779
extremely based watch, it's based on sinn NaBo 17 cockpit clock found on RAF Tornados .

>>17551793
At 40mm, this is the smallest watch of this style. Sinn makes their own and there's microbrands like A-13a, Tutima, and Damasko that also have watches with center chronograph minutes. They range from 42mm to 46mm. But only the Damasko and Precista use a countdown timer bezel.

[Anonymous No.17551898]

>>17551872
What else would you expect from a plastic watch. I dig the design above else.

[Anonymous No.17551912]

>>17551827
just google watch repairmen in your local area or nearest city, a crystal removal tool a very common tool for watch repairmen and they will probably already have a crystal in stock in the size you need too (but if not they can order one in for you)

it won't cost you very much money, and if you like the watch that much and it's no longer in production it's worth it to get it fixed

[Anonymous No.17551942]

[Anonymous No.17551964]

>>17551942
it definitely distracts from your skin

[Anonymous No.17552028]

>>17551942
take a shower lmfao wtf

[Anonymous No.17552160]

>American posting hours
>no interest for W&W 2023
>pictures of cheap shitters
>some retard posting dumb infographics about "how to split a $150 bill among 3 people" using a watch
And they call us europoors

[Anonymous No.17552174]

thoughts on the new bb54
>37ml
>20ml lug width
>11.4ml thick
>T-fit clasp
>METAS certified.

[Anonymous No.17552178]

>>17552174
It's not METAS, the new red 41mm black bay is. That said I like it. The crown and bezel having wider ridges to them compared to the BB58 is nice.

[Anonymous No.17552180]

>>17552174
why isn't the lume pip also gilt?
is the lume itself fauxtina or just looks that way because of gilt indices?
wish there were more color choices
overall seems pretty nice and hopefully will kickstart more sub 40 divers

[Anonymous No.17552184]

>>17552180
>why isn't the lume pip also gilt?
'Cause that's how it was on the watch it takes inspiration from.

[Anonymous No.17552185]

>>17552174
Looks great in pics, would like to hold one to see how it really looks and feels. Also, am curious to see if the black dial 36 will come back.

[Anonymous No.17552187]

>>17552178
Woops, my bad.
>>17552180
>>17552184
Yeah think its just because of the model it harks back to. I like the snowflake hour/minute with the lollipop second hand, never liked the diamond shaped one on previous models.

[Anonymous No.17552190]

>>17552180
>wish there were more color choices
Blue next year, probably.

[Anonymous No.17552191]

I just copped a sinn 556 A. Poor man's rollie explorer but it will hold me over until then

[Anonymous No.17552194]

>>17552174
I'm kind of an autist when it comes to dial and case size so I've made this.
I've used the BB36 cause I like the fit on my wrist (I like small watches).

The BB36 has a 36mm case size and a 29mm dial size.
The BB54 has a 37mm case size and a 27mm dial size.

I think a 27mm dial would be too small. At least for me.

[Anonymous No.17552198]

>>17552194
What's it look like when you just measure to the edge of the minute track? The edge of the dial is obscured by the crystal after all.

[Anonymous No.17552228]

Just posting this here, because the stupidity of this post floored me:

This was in response to seeing pic.

[Anonymous No.17552229]

>>17552228
Forgot the actual link:
>>17551304
>In modern politics you often hear about how women relied upon men to survive and make decisions for the women prior to the sufferage movement and civil rights, but according to the engraving in the pic women were buying their men expensive luxury watches AND getting them engraved prior to womens sufferage. How did that happen?

Again, this was in response to the famous Rollie Marylin Monroe gifted to JFK. In 1962.

[Anonymous No.17552234]

>>17552229
Why would you bring this shitty post back?

[Anonymous No.17552240]

>>17552234
It's like a yeti footprint of stupidity. I had to preserve it and bring it back.

[Anonymous No.17552249]

>>17552240

[Anonymous No.17552254]

>>17552229
I'm not gonna argue about politics but:
>there have been a tiny minority of rich women who had more agency than the majority
>this is proof that men and women have been equals in terms of political and economic power throughout history
Not to mention placing the suffragette movement after Marilyn Monroe.
I know /fa/ is the dumbest board on average, but still...

[Anonymous No.17552260]

>>17552174
>thoughts on the new bb54

The BB58 is still the only Tudor I would buy, and use as a quality beater. BB54 seems pointless since the BB58 already exists, unless you're a tiny Asian man.

[Anonymous No.17552263]

>>17552229
yes the post was idiotic on many levels, but don't bring it up in this thread. if you want to argue with retards about women's rights go to /pol/ or something

[Anonymous No.17552265]

>>17552260
I do like the silver, anyone seen what they look like after a significant time wearing it? I can see it getting beat up much more easily than the steel.

[Anonymous No.17552287]

So what do you guys think of the new Oyster Pepetual?

[Anonymous No.17552297]

>>17552174
Everyone is going on about the BB54 but 37mm for a diver is fucking tiny. I would but the new 41mm but everyone I know personally with a BB has had some sort of QC issue, 2 had the GMT date issue (one of them 2 times), a ceramic BB stopped (4 months to fix), my BB58 was misalined and had a crown issue and I know another guy who's 58 has the same crown issue.

Look up Tudor QC and movement, they are rampant (starting to get a name for it).

[Anonymous No.17552299]

>>17552297
What crown issue did you have exactly?

[Anonymous No.17552300]

>>17552287
10 year wait list guaranteed

[Anonymous No.17552303]

>>17552297
>37mm for a diver is fucking tiny.
37mm is how big a diver should be.

[Anonymous No.17552305]

>>17552174
Boring.

[Anonymous No.17552315]

>>17552287
The red one is very nice.

[Anonymous No.17552323]

>>17552297
Nice collection

[Anonymous No.17552324]

>>17552160
P o s t W a t c h e s
o
s
t
W
a
t
c
h
e
s

[Anonymous No.17552325]

>>17552299
The crown would not engage when I fully pulled it out.

>>17552303
>>17552297
A dress watch should be 37mm. My GS is 37mm and that is a 35mm Orion. Your 37mm diver is going to wear smaller than a 35mm Nomos......

From 1-2 meters aways it is going to look like you are wearing kids watch.

[Anonymous No.17552328]

>>17552325
Guess it's something you'd have to see in person, but just looking at the 41, 39, and 37 lined up like this doesn't make it look too small.

[Anonymous No.17552329]

>>17552303
lol

[Anonymous No.17552330]

>>17552325
>The crown would not engage when I fully pulled it out.
As in you couldn't set the time at all?

[Anonymous No.17552335]

>>17552328
If you have sub 6 inch wrist (woman's wrists) you'll prob be okay but for most men it's going to be a bad look. Not a wrist check, you have to see the watch in the mirror. Camera lens blow everything out.

[Anonymous No.17552337]

>>17552328
Which is the original? 41?

[Anonymous No.17552342]

>>17552330
Yes and my friends did it too, the reason I never bought a Pelagos is because the Lume falls out of the bezel. Anyone looking to buy a Tudor I would just tell them to buy an Omega. All brand s have issues now and then but Tudor has a lot!

[Anonymous No.17552344]

>>17552337
The big one

[Anonymous No.17552349]

>>17552342

[Anonymous No.17552351]

>>17552342
>>17552349

[Anonymous No.17552352]

>>17552342
>>17552349
>>17552351

[Anonymous No.17552353]

>>17552351
That's a lot of words.

>>17552352
And that is a slab of a watch.

[Anonymous No.17552358]

>>17552353
Look at the bezels....

[Anonymous No.17552359]

>>17552358
How embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.17552360]

>>17552324

[Anonymous No.17552364]

>>17552349
>>17552351
>>17552352
angles make such a difference. I was a tudor fanboi until I saw one IRL when I was serving on a jury and the juror in the front row had one. at first I was like "haha look at that cheap shitty ugly watch" and then his wrist turned and when I saw it my desire for a tudor evaporated instantly

[Anonymous No.17552366]

>>17551701
ohhhhh, now that's useful

[Anonymous No.17552373]

>>17552364

[Anonymous No.17552380]

>>17552287
the rage red kinda works, doesn't it ?
... though that may be because it's on a green background which detracts from and softens it

[Anonymous No.17552387]

kinda like this one

[Anonymous No.17552412]

>>17552265
gonna look like ass, unless you're one of those sick people that do fake patina bullshit with saltwater and whatnot
silver goes fucking dark grey

[Anonymous No.17552413]

>>17552287
would cop the feels good man or the rage one

[Anonymous No.17552421]

>>17552349
>>17552351
>>17552352
lmao, at first I thought you meant the lume pip getting shredded off by a door frame, but this is ridiculous, rolex is really afraid of tudor overtaking them so they gimp it with this stupid shit lol

[Anonymous No.17552430]

>>17552360
i posted my explorer in a watch thread on /pol/ about how everyone without a swiss watch is poor and I didn't even get 1 (you). It was a long thread too. In a way its a perfect watch for invisible incels like me

[Anonymous No.17552443]

>>17552430
>posts off topic
>expects (you)s

[Anonymous No.17552445]

>>17552443
Anon posted a watch in a watch thread, how is it off-topic?

[Anonymous No.17552453]

>>17552430
everyone knows the Explorer is the "I really wanted a Rolex, but I'm poor and this is the only one I could afford after saving up" watch

[Anonymous No.17552457]

>>17552453
I also have a Submariner which I got before the Explorer.
It's a nice daily watch. I pretty much don't wear the Sub anymore.

[Anonymous No.17552465]

>>17552453
>everyone knows the Explorer is the "I really wanted a Rolex, but I'm poor and this is the only one I could afford after saving up" watch

The Explorer is a threehander, in terms of Rolex steel it's the most discreet dress/sports watch. It's superior to all the OPs at the very least and arguably superior to the Air King & Milgauss.

The poorfag Rolex would be a fucked old two tone Datejust from the 1980s, or one of the older 34mm references. A 36mm 14270 Explorer is not far in price from a 40mm 16570 Explorer II, it doesn't make sense to shit on it.

[Anonymous No.17552467]

>>17552453
I see it more as a simple, safe option that will easily go with everything, for when the owner doesn't want it to attract too much attention but still wants a good, reputable watch. In that respect it's perfect.

[Anonymous No.17552476]

Opinion on the Tank Française?
Would you get this or a Santos?

[Anonymous No.17552492]

[Anonymous No.17552496]

>>17552476
Better than the Santos imo.

[Anonymous No.17552500]

Sugess is having a sale and I've been looking at this watch for a while. Thoughts? Leather or metal strap?

[Anonymous No.17552501]

>>17552492
bljeh

[Anonymous No.17552502]

>>17552500
>Thoughts? Leather or metal strap?
I sugess you put it in a nice bin the minute it arrives.

[Anonymous No.17552505]

>>17552500
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

[Anonymous No.17552506]

>>17552496
I hated it at first but now it's starting to grow on me.
Need to try the medium and large.

[Anonymous No.17552509]

>>17552465
don't fool yourself. the explorer is popular because it's the second cheapest rolex. it lets people pretend they are enthusiasts rather than having bought the cheapest thing that says rolex on the dial.
>It's superior to all the OPs
it's the same watch. it has the same movement. the arabic numerals at 3, 6 and 9 add no benefit and the mercedes hour hand is ugly

[Anonymous No.17552522]

>>17552387
>>17552476
Based Cartier enjoyers.
The new Tank Normale is so fucking nice bros. I wish they made it in steel for poorfags like me.
Look at that bracelet Gnnnnnhhhhggnnnnn

[Anonymous No.17552525]

>>17552509

The Explorer is superior to the OP because it's officially part of the sports range and it lacks all the dial variations of the OP. A 36mm/39mm/40mm Explorer will always be a cut above it's OP counterpart.

[Anonymous No.17552526]

>>17552509
>the explorer is popular because it's the second cheapest rolex
Well, yeah. The Explorer, Oyster Perpetual and Datejust are based because you can get a Rolex for a 6-8k budget. What's not to like? You get the best movement available, an iconic design and an exceptional value retention at a reasonable price.
What else do you get with that kind of money? A fucking Omega Aqua Terra that already looks dated? A shitty Breitling chronograph? A 15 years old beaten up JLC?

[Anonymous No.17552546]

>>17552525
Explorer is more onions than OP. It’s every numale bugman’s favorite Rolex.

[Anonymous No.17552550]

[Anonymous No.17552552]

>>17552522
>>17552509
>>17552465
The OP's were popular because they were the cheapest Rolex and okay looking (unlike the air king)

The hype from the Sports models somehow went into the colour OP's, which are made for the masses and so was the 39mm OP's.

I never saw a guy with an Explorer and thought, that was all he could afford. You see Explorers in fairly high end collections but you son't see OP's in top their collections. Maybe colour dial OP but those collections are like Rolex only guys, not watch guys as we know it.

The Explorer cost more than an OP, only watch guys would pay the difference to have a Sports model. Normal people would just get the OP.

[Anonymous No.17552557]

>>17552526
New DJ are not a cheap Rolex option, go look at fluted prices vs sport models at retail.

[Anonymous No.17552563]

>>17552557
8800€ VAT included (jubilee bracelet, fluted bezel).
It's not "cheap" but I wouldn't call that expensive either. We're still in the entry luxury price point.

[Anonymous No.17552569]

MooN
o
o
N

[Anonymous No.17552577]

>>17552552
>You see Explorers in fairly high end collections but you son't see OP's in top their collections.

Exactly. No one is saying the OP is a bad watch. In terms of prestige / bragging value whatever, the Explorer sits inbetween the OP and the Submariner. It's just retarded that this 4chan guy is saying the OP and Explorer are one and the same or that the OP is better. Only a ignorant clown would take a 39mm OP over a 39mm Explorer.

[Anonymous No.17552597]

>>17551689
New grand Seiko's are kinda fire. These limited Micro Artist Studio pieces can get it. Always thought most of the grand seiko's are just to boring but i really like these. MiSBGZ009 platinum "Majestic White Birch"

[Anonymous No.17552606]

>>17552597
Very pretty. But I think the only people wearing those are "I'm the 4th generation owner of this company and I come in once a month to collect my millions between golfing, yachting, and being a dickhead at social galas.

[Anonymous No.17552608]

>>17552526
>>17552552
>>17552577
you are legitimately retarded.

[Anonymous No.17552611]

>>17552608
OK anon, let's see your watch now

[Anonymous No.17552613]

>>17552597
>kinda fire.
I wondered who these things were made for, thanks for letting me know it's hypebeast zoomers.

[Anonymous No.17552617]

>>17552597
For real, they be bussin'. No cap bro that watch slaps. GS is gas

[Anonymous No.17552618]

>>17552522
ahhhh I'm gonna coom

[Anonymous No.17552619]

>>17552597
SBGY026 Hana-Ikada

[Anonymous No.17552624]

I want to _______ Teddy Baldassarre.

[Anonymous No.17552634]

>>17552613
>I wondered who these things were made for
all of the new wealthy indians and chinese

[Anonymous No.17552636]

My ole rolly explory

[Anonymous No.17552640]

>>17552624
honestly I think Teddy's the one of the better watch youtubers
he has great production values, can actually dress well and isn't completely insufferable like "The Mad Watch Collector" or this absolute soijack >>17551855. lots of clowns in this community

[Anonymous No.17552645]

>>17552640
Teddy sucks. The entire purpose of his channel is to get you to buy shitty Longines and Orises from his site. As cringe as he is, TGV is better than him.

[Anonymous No.17552650]

>>17552645
>TGV is better than him.

[Anonymous No.17552659]

>>17552624
>>17552645
TGV is okay but I literally fall asleep listening to him. I hate the fat guy and the the curly hair because they’re both obnoxious but if TGV cut the video length in half and didn’t attempt to sound as mellow as possible, he’d be more bearable. Teddy comes off as a little unenthusiastic at times although I feel like he isn’t trying to hide that he’s selling watches, which makes him somewhat authentic in my opinion

[Anonymous No.17552661]

>>17552640
There's Spencer Klein.
Endless rambling, but knows his shit from beginning to end about vintage Seikos.

[Anonymous No.17552666]

>>17552640
>honestly I think Teddy's the one of the better watch youtubers
>he has great production values, can actually dress well and isn't completely insufferable like "The Mad Watch Collector" or this absolute soijack >>17551855. lots of clowns in this community

The only good watch Youtuber is Archieluxury, everyone else is pushing shitters

[Anonymous No.17552670]

>>17552645
TGV is a womanlet cuck with peasant complex (he wishes he'd be royalty), that can't even afford a decent watch collection and fills his emptiness with retarded shit like turttle-neck sweaters and shitter pens and cheap natos.

[Anonymous No.17552671]

>>17552650
His videos with Mark are way better than any Teddy content.

[Anonymous No.17552672]

>>17552659
I do like TVG edc stuff, I have bought a his French pocket knifes and leather bags.

[Anonymous No.17552673]

>>17552650
Where's the lie though? Teddy just recommends the same handful of watches every video, he did like 6 videos telling everyone to buy Hamilton khakis. He's just a minmaxing sales guy that takes himself too seriously.

[Anonymous No.17552676]

>>17552522
Looks like this

[Anonymous No.17552679]

>muh eceleb is better than your eceleb
Go back to TikTok you dumb zoomers

[Anonymous No.17552697]

>>17552624
I like his videos with Kevin O'Leary, but as another anon already pointed out this guy is a salesman first and foremost. In many of his videos he's shilling for watches that are available in his store.

[Anonymous No.17552712]

>>17552324

[Anonymous No.17552764]

My gf says that gold accessories on a man either look gay or European (also gay, her words as a brit)
But I like the gold casio world time.. am I gay?

[Anonymous No.17552781]

>>17552764
Depends, does your gf also affix a plastic penis and buttfuck you?

I've always thought yellow gold watches looked like they belong on wealthy 80 year old guys.

[Anonymous No.17552782]

>>17552764
>trusting a British woman's opinions on style
anon...

[Anonymous No.17552788]

>>17552764
here's a pic of my gf by the way, not sure if that matters

[Anonymous No.17552794]

>>17552764
>>17552788
your gf looks like a man, you're probably gay

[Anonymous No.17552802]

>>17552500
have you seen it in real life, it's extra-hyper-sparkly and a little OTT unless everything else you're wearing is muted
also; always go for the bracelet, you can pick up straps later

[Anonymous No.17552805]

>>17552794
I'm not gay. She transitioned before we met.

[Anonymous No.17552815]

>>17552788
what's that tattoo supposed to be? a woman throwing someone down a well?

[Anonymous No.17552820]

Thoughts on Ulysse Nardin?

[Anonymous No.17552823]

>>17551689
bros, i'm gonna buy one of pic rel. Which is it gonna be?

[Anonymous No.17552824]

>>17552805
Sir, that is 110% gay. He is making fun of you for taking it up the butt.

[Anonymous No.17552826]

>>17552764
imo yellow gold in large amounts (fake or real) is for arabs and other undesirable types. White gold is the european mans choice.

[Anonymous No.17552827]

>>17552820
meme brand for russian oligarchs with more money than taste

[Anonymous No.17552837]

>>17552823
They both look like shit.
The world timer isn't even a real world timer.
A small second on a sports watch is stupid, and that date window integration is horrendous.
Get the normal one. Or even better, get something else. Omega is kinda cringe.

[Anonymous No.17552843]

>>17552781
Pegging isn't gay tho.

[Anonymous No.17552846]

>>17552837
only thing I'd consider other than these 2 is a 36mm explorer but I've not sucked my AD's cock enough to get one of those anytime soon.

[Anonymous No.17552848]

>>17552823
If you have to get the small seconds.

[Anonymous No.17552853]

>>17552846
The Explorer isn't hard to get.

[Anonymous No.17552854]

>>17552846
Is that really a thing? Do distributors make you do a lot of business with them before they'll let you order good stuff? Damn, just one more of surely hundreds of reasons to hate sales guys.

[Anonymous No.17552862]

bros is it bad if I like Hublot classic model and big bang?

there's just something about them... 90's cyberpunk future

[Anonymous No.17552900]

>>17552823
Get the worltimer. Is gigabased.

[Anonymous No.17552904]

>chronograph
>date window

[Anonymous No.17552910]

Finally got the opportunity to measure my wrist today and it’s 16 cm around. What is the best size watch for me to wear? I’ve heard some rule of it not exceeding 85% of the top of your wrist or something to that effect but I didn’t quite understand

[Anonymous No.17552917]

>>17551757
It’s super cool and would have been much more useful before everyone had phones.
But now not so much. Still cool though. Cool!

[Anonymous No.17552926]

>>17552910
"Size watch" means jackshit. There are multiple factors that can make a watch look too big on your wirst
>diameter
>dial opening
>lug to lug
>thickness
One of the most grotesque watch ever made, the Breguet Marine, is "only" 39mm in diameter but because of these elongated lugs it looks a lot bigger than it is.

[Anonymous No.17552931]

>>17552910
>Finally got the opportunity to measure my wrist today
You should be thankful for that opportunity, however you are still missing a key measurement, the wrist width or as you say "the top of your wrist", so i'm afraid you'll have to find another opportunity to measure your wrist again. Good luck finding a guy that can measure the wrist width though, wrist width measuring is an ancient art and almost all of the people that know how to measure wrist width are dead. If you do happen to find out what your wrist width is you can come back here and i will give you the exact formula for calculating the optimal watch diameter, i'm not giving it away to just anyone, you must understand it took me years to figure it out.

[Anonymous No.17552932]

>>17552910
Around doesn't matter as much as how wide your wrist is. And the size of the watch dial doesn't matter as much as the lug to lug, which should be between 75-95%. Realistically, 95% is just wristlet cope, 85% is a good benchmark, 80% is better. My wrists are about 50mm across, I wear 41-43mm lug to lug.

[Anonymous No.17552935]

>>17552931
>>17552932
I measured across the top and it’s roughly 49-50mm

[Anonymous No.17552940]

>>17552910
>16 cm around
36 mm - ideal
38 mm max

36 mm (for 16 cm wrist):

snk355
snk357
snk361
snk363
snk365
snk366
snk368
snk377
snk379
snk381

snkl15
snkl17
snkl19
snkl21
snkl23
snkl24
snkl26
snkl28
snkl41
snkl43
snkl45
snkl47
snkl48
snkl50
Orient Bambino 36mm
Tissot PRX 35mm
Timex Marlin

37-38 mm (for 16.5-17.5 cm wrist):

snxs73
snxs75
snxs77
snxs79
snxs80
snxs81

[Anonymous No.17552943]

>>17552940
Fuck off with your Seiko shit

[Anonymous No.17552944]

>>17552932
NTA
I have 18cm circumference, ~60mm wide wrists
My biggest watch that i can still sort of pull off is 42mm diameter with 50mm lug to lug. I prefer 40mm or less, my daily watch at 37mm is pretty much ideal (wrist width 60mm / 1.618 (phi) = ~37mm).

[Anonymous No.17552945]

>>17552853
different story where I live.
>>17552854
I mean officially of course not but my Aunt is friends with the manager of her local AD and managed to get a new black submariner for my uncles 50'th with only 2 months of waiting.
>>17552900
checked + giving it some serious thought. <3

[Anonymous No.17552946]

>>17552944
>cm
How much is that in a real measurement?

[Anonymous No.17552949]

>>17552946
7,1 real measurements

[Anonymous No.17552953]

>>17552940
So with a width of 50mm and a circumference of 16cm, if I were to get a watch like the Navitimer would I be better off with the 35 or 38mm? Honestly quite sad I’m missing out on the B01

[Anonymous No.17552955]

>>17552823
>bros, i'm gonna buy one of pic rel. Which is it gonna be?

Save a bit more money and get a Rolex Explorer

[Anonymous No.17552964]

>>17552955
>>17552846
money not the issue

[Anonymous No.17552968]

>>17552964
Have you tried asking a Rolex AD for an Explorer?
I got mine like 3 weeks after asking.

[Anonymous No.17552981]

>>17552953
the 38mm has a 44mm lug to lug so you should be fine I think. it honestly depends on what you personally prefer, you could pull off both

[Anonymous No.17552982]

>>17552953
I know someone with a B01, if you'd worn one, you wouldn't be sad about it. That thing is a fucking brick.

The 35mm is a bit too small, the 38mm is a touch too big. I wouldn't wear either with wrists like that.

[Anonymous No.17552983]

>>17552764
personally i've never seen a rich or tasteful person wearing a yellow gold watch. usually they are worn by people who want to tell people that they are rich bur aren't. mostly it's not even real gold to begin with.

[Anonymous No.17552984]

>>17552823
both are not that great, the world timer is nearly impossible to combine with clothing without being cringe and the other one, well, white AND blue is also something you might pull off with a white shirt and a jean, but anything else ... no. unless, you're an actual sailor.

[Anonymous No.17552988]

>>17552910
39mm or smaller would look good an that size unless you opt for some bizarre dimensioned shit like >>17552926 said.

[Anonymous No.17552997]

>>17552823
Don’t listen to the Nowatch losers here, Omegas are nice, and I say that as someone who owns a Rolex as well. The world time is a really good looking watch but it’s dummy thick so try it on first. I personally don’t care that it’s not a “real” worldtime since its main function is to look cool. The AT is just ok imo, there are better configurations S

[Anonymous No.17553007]

>>17552997
>I personally don’t care that it’s not a “real” worldtime since its main function is to look cool
lmao what kind of reasoning is that? The Omega World Time is obviously trying to be the Patek World Time without its primary function. Like, just don't do it if you can't engineer it.

I swear some people here are real simps for brands. The other day there was an anon complaining about the dogshit movement inside the Reverso and people were like "hurrrr who care".
You're paying a lot of money for these watches. It's OK to be nitpicky about it.

[Anonymous No.17553022]

>>17553007
Watches are jewellery, do you think anybody here cares about movements? Do you think anybody here has ever opened up a watch

[Anonymous No.17553038]

>>17553022
I opened 4 watches this past weekend, 3 to replace batteries and 1 to see if there was something wrong with the automatic movement. I appreciate the simplicity and lower cost of a quartz watch movement, but also appreciate the complexity and mechanical wizardry of an automatic too.

[Anonymous No.17553041]

>>17553022
For far has this shithole fallen from the /g/ days.

[Anonymous No.17553048]

>>17553022
Good watch = cool design + great movement
I wouldn't buy a cool looking watch with a shit movement, nor an ugly watch with a great movement.

This is why I'm wearing a Rolex and not a Cartier or a Zenith.

[Anonymous No.17553062]

>>17553048
>Rolex
>Good movement

[Anonymous No.17553068]

>>17553048
I'll never understand people who care about the movement in a watch. Quartz obliterated the movement argument 50 years ago.

[Anonymous No.17553070]

>>17553062
For all the criticisms I have of rolex (like the artificial scarcity, AD waitlist shit, among other things) their movements aren't one of them.

[Anonymous No.17553080]

>>17553007
>The other day there was an anon complaining about the dogshit movement inside the Reverso and people were like "hurrrr who care".
I was thinking of buying one of these used, do you think I should or not?

[Anonymous No.17553085]

>>17553068
Quartz is soulless

[Anonymous No.17553097]

>>17553085
Good goy, don't forget, you're just holding onto your Rolex for the next generation.

[Anonymous No.17553100]

>>17553085
It just werks

[Anonymous No.17553120]

Have a dilemma. I have this watch

https://countycomm.com/products/lsa-homage-diver-watch-by-maratac

love it but the band sucks. I'd like to add this band

https://artemstraps.com/products/loop-less-black-sailcloth-watch-strap-with-grey-stitching

With the deployant clasp system, but they only offer the clasp in ss or pvd coated steel (black). To match the aesthetic I'd love the clasp in titanium. Is there a way to make steel look titanium? I saw cerakote but I'm afraid that would affect function and not resist wear and tear well. All searches point me to the opposite, making titanium look like steel.

[Anonymous No.17553126]

>>17552940
You got a list of 36mm watches aside from seiko and other shitters? I’ve got two and they’re alright but nothing I particularly care for

[Anonymous No.17553140]

>>17553068
Mechanical watches are soulful, artistic, historic, practical in its own ways (no need for batteries, can still last a long time without much maintenence and you don't habe to worry about the dress watch you want to wear to the event being dead and needing to change a battery) and is an art form and engineering science that deserves to be supported and preserved.

[Anonymous No.17553143]

>>17553120
I really doubt anyone would notice the difference in color when the pieces aren't touching. You only notice steel bracelets on titanium cases because of the end links.

>>17553140
Whatever helps you cope. Feel free to keep buying washboards because washing machines are "soulless automata", I'll keep buying quartz watches that last twice as long on a single 20 cent battery than your watch can manage without a few 200 dollar services, and keep the kind of time you can only dream of.

[Anonymous No.17553145]

>>17552837
You're kinda cringe

[Anonymous No.17553146]

>>17553143
I would :(

[Anonymous No.17553153]

>>17553120
>200 dollar strap
>70 bucks just for the clasp
Holy shit man, I can get high quality well finished steel bracelets for that kind of money.

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005004900387131.html
And the clasp is 5 bucks on aliexpress.

[Anonymous No.17553158]

>>17553143
How is buying a more complex precision artisanal product in any way like buying a fucking wash board?

[Anonymous No.17553163]

>>17553143
>free to keep buying washboards
If washing clothes was an interest of mine I would

[Anonymous No.17553168]

>>17553158
>more complex
It's cogs and a spring, dude. Circuit boards are objectively more complex.
>precision
Like I said, best mechanical in the world loses to a 5 dollar quartz, so they're not very precise.
>artisanal
Go buy some earrings, homo.
>product
Took you a while, you finally got one right. It's a product. And you're the idiot falling for adverts.

[Anonymous No.17553171]

>>17553070
What about the 3230 low amplitude problem?

[Anonymous No.17553174]

>>17553171
I haven't heard of this, got any links handy?

[Anonymous No.17553183]

>>17553174
https://www.google.com/search?q=3230+low+amplitude

[Anonymous No.17553194]

>>17553183
Just say you don't nigga.

[Anonymous No.17553198]

>>17553194
Did you even bother looking

[Anonymous No.17553201]

>>17553174
I misremembered I guess it’s the 32xx series of movements. I’m not sure how big a deal it really is. I have an OP from 2021 that seems fine.
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=786299&page=126

[Anonymous No.17553205]

>>17551689
What do ppl think of the Orient Bambino new

[Anonymous No.17553209]

>>17553168
>Like I said, best mechanical in the world loses to a 5 dollar quartz
actually, it doesn't. it will lose to a really good quartz watch, but the cheap ones aren't as accurate. it's clear that you don't know shit about watches
quartz isn't perfect. if you need (almost) perfect accuracy, get a radio controlled watch, not a 5$ quartz. or just use your phone like a normal person
in a way quartz watches are like CDs and mechanicals are like Vinyls. both are obsolete at this point, but the older, more analog tech will provide more of a fun, unique experience that you can't just get with your phone

[Anonymous No.17553211]

>>17553209
Yeah, I imagine the kind of retard who buys into mechanical watches is the same kind of retard who buys vinyl.

[Anonymous No.17553214]

>>17553198
If you said no then I would've looked myself.
>>17553201
Yea I just found that thread too.

[Anonymous No.17553215]

>>17553211
yes, a hobbyist. meanwhile, a normie will use his phone for both... and the already obsolete yet soulless option is left in the dust

[Anonymous No.17553221]

>>17553215
>a hobbyist
Whatever it takes to justify wasting money, right? You know, men used to have actual hobbies that weren't based around blind consumerism. If you were into watch BUILDING, that would be a hobby. If you were making your own pre-amp instead of buying some overpriced dogshit to listen to crusty old records on, that would be a hobby. Buying junk? That's not a hobby, kid. That's mental illness.

[Anonymous No.17553232]

>>17553221
Get off 4chan and go make a birdhouse then you fuckin fag

[Anonymous No.17553245]

>>17553221
I like tinkering with my watches though,restoring vintage pieces and all that jazz
surely much more of a hobby than just consooming more quartz watches you have no real use for

[Anonymous No.17553247]

>>17553205
>new

looks the same as it always has?

[Anonymous No.17553249]

>tfw i alternate between a HAQ and an explorer
seems like i would be /wt/‘s worst nightmare. all of you would reject me and refuse to be my friend in real life.

[Anonymous No.17553254]

>>17553221
collecting is a hobby. some people collect stamps, others collect watches.

Personally I'm more of an enthusiast than a collector, I don't think being an enthusiast is really a hobby. But I recognise that for some people it's a hobby to collect all of a certain watch type or brand, or some other horological significance.

[Anonymous No.17553268]

>Rolex-fags will defend this.

[Anonymous No.17553273]

>>17553268
>old woman's hands
>more likely to give birth to a tarded baby in some form
Yeah checks out.

[Anonymous No.17553275]

>>17553249
>all of you would reject me and refuse to be my friend in real life.
Yeah, but that's because you're an asshole who posts on 4chan. It has nothing to do with your watches (which no one would notice anyway.)

[Anonymous No.17553280]

>new for 2023

What the fuck is Vacheron doing?

[Anonymous No.17553287]

>>17553280
>What the fuck is Vacheron doing?
Whatever Richemont orders them to.

[Anonymous No.17553288]

>>17552297
>grand seiko
>tudor
>two omegas
>two(!) nomos
holy cope batman, just buy a fucking rolex lmao

[Anonymous No.17553290]

Just put the damn t-fit clasp on the BB58s already, tudor.

[Anonymous No.17553312]

>>17553221
>You know, men used to have actual hobbies that weren't based around blind consumerism.
Yeah poor men lmfao stop being poor retard.

[Anonymous No.17553323]

>>17553268
Watch out, if you make any criticism of Rolex somebody will reply that you're just mad that you're poor

[Anonymous No.17553325]

>>17553280
looks pretty cool to me, what's your issue with it

[Anonymous No.17553326]

Vintage gold watches like this one? I'd like one solid gold, white face, black roman numerals and other markings. I like this paradigm, just not necessarily the proportions, bezel engraving, or price tag of a patek. Is there something vintage, solid yellow gold, like this 3-6k? Any suggestions?

[Anonymous No.17553327]

>>17553288
post your collection

[Anonymous No.17553330]

>>17552624
rob

[Anonymous No.17553337]

>>17553326
Check out Chrono24, just look for Audemars Piguet or Vacheron Constantin. They all made watches of that style and no one buys them. You should be able to take your pick of the litter.

[Anonymous No.17553347]

Got this watch secondhand a while back for a steal and I absolutely love it in terms of functionality (AT, Ability to have the digital time different than the analog time, solar) plus its large but not thick.
It's a delight. I work remotely in a different time zone and I go on nature walks often, so this totally fits my lifestyle. The visual design? Meh. I found it loud at first, but it's so nice to wear that it grew on me quickly.

Are there any other specific models of watches that are like this?

Analog + digital, more casual look, but not a sport watch, etc.

[Anonymous No.17553374]

>>17553249
This is the quintessential /wt/ combo, maybe throw in a G-shock.

[Anonymous No.17553376]

>>17553347
You call that absolute disaster of a dial a casual look, but not a sport watch?

[Anonymous No.17553381]

>>17553376
I'm saying I'm looking for more of a casual watch with these features, not a sports watch.

[Anonymous No.17553388]

>>17553327
what's important isn't what i've bought, it's what i haven't bought - namely wasting tens of thousands of dollars on pure afghan copium

[Anonymous No.17553395]

>>17553347
My daily watch for almost 6 years was the Promaster Sky and I loved it. I eventually stripped the crown somehow and it wasn’t worth paying to fix it but it’s my fault for being too rough.

There are several well regarded similar watches, Casio AQ190WD 1AV comes to mind. They have a few more like it too.

[Anonymous No.17553397]

>>17553388
ok sure poorfag

[Anonymous No.17553399]

>>17553381
A g-shock is cleaner than that Citizen

[Anonymous No.17553406]

>>17553374
been thinking about getting one of the bluetooth g-shocks but i don’t know which one. also i’ve heard mixed things about the casio app, supposedly it’s a phone battery killer but i have no first experience

[Anonymous No.17553410]

>I have come to settle this once and for all.
Mechanical (when properly finished) will always be infinitely better than any quartz.
There. Stop your nonsense everybody.

[Anonymous No.17553439]

>>17553410
>Mechanical (when properly finished) will always be infinitely better than any quartz
oh no no no no NOO.

[Anonymous No.17553442]

>>17553439
Did you attach the wrong pic or something?

[Anonymous No.17553445]

Remember to avoid polyester watch straps bros

[Anonymous No.17553449]

>>17553445
Why? They made polyester clothes and other stuff around the house. Whats wrong with polyester watch straps?

[Anonymous No.17553452]

>>17553449
Man-made fabrics like acrylic, polyester, rayon, acetate, and nylon are treated with thousands of harmful toxic chemicals during production, according to ScienceDaily. In a study from Stockholm University, researchers chose four groups of substances related to health risks and tested them for "occurrence, quantity, toxicity, and how easily they may penetrate the skin," and the highest concentrations of two of the substances were found in none other than polyester.

Toxic chemicals aside, synthetic fabrics simply don't breathe, and anyone who's worn polyester on a hot summer day is probably well aware of that. The fabric also traps odors, which Popular Science explained in an article. Not to go into too much gory detail, but skin germs found in sweat feast on chemicals, which synthetic fibers can't absorb, therefore creating an environment for smelly bacteria to grow. All signs point to polyester being the number one worst fabric for skin.

[Anonymous No.17553461]

>>17553445
Cope I get complimented on my shitter when it's on a Nato strap

[Anonymous No.17553489]

Joegan talks about watches:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlRom1PwrHE

[Anonymous No.17553496]

>>17552287
i would buy one unironically

[Anonymous No.17553542]

>>17553461
Based and cancerfilled.

[Anonymous No.17553568]

[Anonymous No.17553570]

>>17553568
getting this in ~2 weeks
the shiny black alligator makes it VERY dressy
any suggestions on straps to dress it down? specific links welcome

[Anonymous No.17553572]

[Anonymous No.17553573]

>>17553489
>joe knows GS exists
GSisters… WE’RE BACK

[Anonymous No.17553580]

I'm in Geneva at the moment, reading a magazine names "GMT", and I've found this
I need the advices of the elders of /wt/ : am I a retard for wanting to buy one?
Thanks in advance

[Anonymous No.17553582]

>>17553580
Seems severely overpriced for what it is desu. $2k plus whatever VAT you have to pay in eurocuck land seems a bit much.

P-401 is just a slightly modified Sellita from what i understand.

[Anonymous No.17553588]

>>17553582
>$2k plus whatever VAT you have to pay in eurocuck land
Nothing, I'm in Switzerland (Geneva), won't have any extra fees/taxes to pay
Thanks for your input

[Anonymous No.17553596]

>>17553580
Shit Rolex ripoff?

[Anonymous No.17553597]

>>17553580
>Avraham-Louis Perrelet
Stay away from this jewry anon

[Anonymous No.17553603]

>>17553580
If you can walk into a dealer and get them to sell you one for $1500 go for it.

[Anonymous No.17553605]

Neither of these is a particularly remarkable watch but between them I feel like I'm basically set for everyday office and/or casual wear. Gonna start saving for an appropriate occasion to buy myself something more substantial.

[Anonymous No.17553623]

>>17553597
hahaha retard

[Anonymous No.17553670]

>>17553605
both are nice, any idea what that 'something more substantial' might be?

[Anonymous No.17553672]

Got matching watches for me and my dad, going to service both of them and give him the blue one on father's day
Love vintage seikos

[Anonymous No.17553676]

>>17553670
Rolex obv.

[Anonymous No.17553683]

>>17553676
>Rolex obv.

[Anonymous No.17553692]

>>17552837
>he still gasn't figured out how to read a map
kek

[Anonymous No.17553711]

>>17553670
>>17553676
Lol no, not a Rolex, way too flashy for my lifestyle and social circle. Idk I'm still educating myself and I'd like to try some watches on before I convince myself blowing a few grand on a piece of jewelry isn't deranged and buy a luxury piece.

[Anonymous No.17553712]

>>17553711
>Rolex, way too flashy for my lifestyle and social circle
So you're poor af?

[Anonymous No.17553720]

>>17551731
>>17551788
I’m rewarding the series on Netflix. There’s an episode where jerry chucks his Chronomat in the trash because it’s always slow. Later, he has to lie to his parents about the whereabouts of the watch, and hijinks ensue.

Jerry was pretty fucking based in real life. Biggest TV star in the world, wore Breitlings, owned bunch of Porsches and had a 17 year old girlfriend. Holy fucking shit.

[Anonymous No.17553725]

>>17553672
Those will clean up really nice. A new crystal and a bracelet polish and they will look awesome. Nice job

[Anonymous No.17553727]

>>17553712
You are the reason people hate Rolex

[Anonymous No.17553734]

>>17552823
I like the Worldtimer, but it’s a tad big for everyday. Maybe it’s more manageable on the rubber strap. Also you have to be cool enough to pull it off as it’s kind of gimmicky.
Have to tried a regular Aqua Terra 41mm? Tons of great options out there. Lots of deals too. I got mine used for about 50% of retail.

[Anonymous No.17553756]

>>17553727
Poors aren't people and everyone else loves it.

[Anonymous No.17553771]

smiths at the summit!

[Anonymous No.17553772]

>>17552926
This would've been the perfect watch for me if not for those god-awful lugs. Why did they fucking do it? Everything else about it is literally perfect.

[Anonymous No.17553773]

>>17552945
Why don't you just suck up to your aunt then? And just ask her nicely to hook you up.

[Anonymous No.17553777]

>>17552597
That just looks like dried cum.

[Anonymous No.17553792]

>>17553777
Seek help

[Anonymous No.17553795]

>>17552597
Stephen King variant cum cum cummala lmfao

[Anonymous No.17553801]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7fvYbs66w

[Anonymous No.17553811]

>>17553801
Because Shitanium scratches like fucking fake gold on plastic.

[Anonymous No.17553827]

>>17553347
Available in stainless steel or titanium.

[Anonymous No.17553829]

>>17553725
yeah, no, I don't think bracelet polishing will cut it, you could fit another watch through those links

[Anonymous No.17553830]

>>17553570
Go to a watch boutique and try a few straps in person. Personally i'd go for a warm, rich brown leather strap, i think it would contrast well with the dial and look classy.

[Anonymous No.17553831]

>>17553777
would fit your crusty clothes perfectly then

[Anonymous No.17553832]

>>17553580
Look at Grand Seiko GMTs.

[Anonymous No.17553838]

>>17553771
Looks crisp. I like how fat the bracelet is in relation to the case, gives it that solid look.

[Anonymous No.17553840]

>>17552597
I always like watches that extend the dial to the case or vice versa, Seiko did it before, others too, like Piaget or AP.

[Anonymous No.17553850]

So they finally managed to make a chrono that isn't ugly, even gave it a good name, but then they go and make it huge at 43,2mm. Lets hope it's just the first one and they'll have enough reason to put the new movement into the smaller Series 9 case.

[Anonymous No.17553853]

new
>>17553851
>>17553851
>>17553851
>>17553851
>>17553851

[Anonymous No.17553870]

>>17552453
One of the richest people I know wears one as a daily. Has a bunch of retarded other watches, but chooses to wear the explorer.

[Anonymous No.17553894]

>>17553840
god damn I love this watch
what fucking machine died together with the accutron gear making one that the whole industry forgot how to make a nice looking watch like in the olden days

[Anonymous No.17554088]

>>17553288
I'm waiting on 6 (so they say) I'm really not interested in paying of retail.

[Anonymous No.17554149]

>>17551697
>calculate the tip

[Anonymous No.17554230]

>>17553126
>36mm watches
https://www.google.com/search?q=36mm+watches&tbm=isch

[Anonymous No.17554269]

>>17553772
Couldn’t they have cleaned the grime off the strap for that pic?

[Anonymous No.17554940]

willing to rape for an AGAM601