/wt/ watch thread

[Anonymous No.17543471]

You never actually own a Patek edition

> Poorfag guide: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

previous thread >>17541782

[Anonymous No.17543473]

[Anonymous No.17543475]

[Anonymous No.17543476]

which is it?

>>17543257

[Anonymous No.17543478]

>mfw can't afford a Patek

[Anonymous No.17543479]

>>17543476
It's this one because it doesn't have a meme picture in the OP.

[Anonymous No.17543480]

>>17543476
this one has more posters already

[Anonymous No.17543481]

>>17543478
Buy a fake.
Nobody will notice or care as long as your lifestyle matches.

Then again, I guess if you can’t afford it your lifestyle probably doesn’t match.

[Anonymous No.17543483]

>oris
>rolex
my faves

[Anonymous No.17543484]

[Anonymous No.17543491]

>>17543481
>Buy a fake.
lol no
I could actually buy a genuine Patek (you can find some decent Calatrava on C24 around 15k) but that would be stupid and unreasonable.

[Anonymous No.17543494]

>>17543484
please tell me this is a rep

[Anonymous No.17543499]

>>17543494
it's a vintage

[Anonymous No.17543503]

>>17543499
That is not vintage. And the bezel looks like actual shit

[Anonymous No.17543507]

Post the watch you're wearing and the gun you're carrying today and why.

I'm wearing a citizen skyhawk because I'm traveling with a sig p938 to keep it small and light.

[Anonymous No.17543510]

>>17543481
Fakes are for faggots

[Anonymous No.17543512]

>>17543507
Reverso classic small seconds, and no gun because I don't live in a warzone or larp

[Anonymous No.17543513]

>>17543510
Reals are for fags imagine spending 10k on a watch lmao nice “hobby” bro

[Anonymous No.17543515]

>>17543475
certina needs to be further right

[Anonymous No.17543519]

>>17543507
trump lost

[Anonymous No.17543522]

>>17543519
Yeah, so are you going to stop talking about him? Kxwj8n

[Anonymous No.17543523]

>>17543494
no shit it’s a rep, the real one costs $150,000

>>17543499
>>17543503
pretty funny how people are shitting on it now, after loving it the first time it got posted yesterday
what has changed? op told everyone it was fake and pointed out the specific ways it deviates from the real thing. now today you’re all experts L M A O

>>17543513
exactly

[Anonymous No.17543526]

>>17543523
how is saying its a vintage shitting on it

[Anonymous No.17543527]

>>17543512
There's a clock on almost every wall and device you pass by, but you still wear a watch. Maybe need doesn't actually have anything to do with it?

[Anonymous No.17543528]

>>17543526
because it’s clearly not vintage?
the real watch was released like five years ago

[Anonymous No.17543531]

>>17543523
I didn't see it yesterday, also it's not $150k

[Anonymous No.17543535]

>>17543526
It's not 'a' vintage you esl sperg

[Anonymous No.17543536]

>>17543531
Imagine seeing that watch and spending $50000 on it because its made by [brand]. So many other things that money is better spent on. You have chosen poorly.

[Anonymous No.17543539]

>>17543531
What’s the sale date? A few changed hands around $150K at the peak of the bubble

[Anonymous No.17543540]

>>17543535
not my fault it looks like one

[Anonymous No.17543543]

>>17543531
>$40,000 watch with no seconds hand
the overseas is far superior

[Anonymous No.17543545]

>>17543536
>>17543540
You're both retards

[Anonymous No.17543547]

>>17543545
Stainless steel watch, no caseback, no jewels, no seconds hand, no day, date, its not even complicated and you bought it USED for $50k. This is like that bell curve image that gets posted here a lot.

[Anonymous No.17543549]

NEW THREAD
>>17543257
>>17543257
>>17543257

[Anonymous No.17543550]

>>17543536
anyone spending $50k on a watch can do it without needing to worry about it. i spent all my savings just to be able to put $20k down on a house, but to someone like Jeff Bezos can probably spend $20k in half a days worth of private jet travel

[Anonymous No.17543552]

>>17543547
I agree it's a shit deal, but fwiw it's white gold not stainless. Also you're still a retard cause I'm not the one that posted the watch. I bought nothing.

[Anonymous No.17543554]

>>17543543
That watch is an Overseas you clown. It’s the 2000V Ultra-Thin.

[Anonymous No.17543555]

>>17543552
>it's white gold not stainless
Who the fuck puts a brushed finish on white gold to make it look like stainless then? Like, everyone who looks at that watch is going to think its stainless steel.

[Anonymous No.17543557]

this thread is fake and gay

[Anonymous No.17543563]

lol everyone but hurt over the first watch
doesn’t matter of it’s real or fake, people are gonna whine either way

[Anonymous No.17543570]

>>17543557
you're sperging out, not sure if you realize you're having an episode

[Anonymous No.17543572]

POST A WATCH YOU LIKE YOU NIGGERS
NO 3D RENDER
ONLY EXPENSIVE SHIT YOU CAN'T AFFORD

[Anonymous No.17543576]

>>17543572
sauce? not bad desu

[Anonymous No.17543584]

>>17543576
Parmigiani Fleurier Tonda PF GMT Rattrapante
It has a rose gold GMT hand that goes underneath the main one when you press the pusher on the crown.
Kino watch.

[Anonymous No.17543585]

>>17543584
wow that’s an actual beauty
might be my new grail

[Anonymous No.17543589]

[Anonymous No.17543594]

>>17543585
Literally just buy an islander.

[Anonymous No.17543609]

>>17543589
Why do you keep posting that piece of crap?

[Anonymous No.17543612]

>>17543609

[Anonymous No.17543613]

>>17543609
What makes it worse than any of the other watches people have posted?

[Anonymous No.17543614]

>>17543594
am i mistaken or do you mean some shitty Long Island instagram account that sell shitty “homage” watches?
embarrassing

[Anonymous No.17543616]

>>17543613
OP told everyone it’s fake yesterday and happily pointed out all the specific flaws.

now they’re all jumping over each other pretending they could tell all along, when yesterday nobody said shit. pretty funny.

[Anonymous No.17543620]

>>17543613
There's "Vacheron Constantin" written on it but it's not made by Vacheron Constantin.

[Anonymous No.17543628]

>>17543572

[Anonymous No.17543629]

>>17543620
That wasn't a problem yesterday. What changed?

[Anonymous No.17543631]

>>17543614
What is it about good value home grown products that makes people cry so much on the internet?

[Anonymous No.17543633]

>>17543631
It’s because Islander isn’t coming up with their own designs. They’re just ripping off existing brands and making low-quality copies.

[Anonymous No.17543644]

You guys probably think im talking out of my ass but if I dont kill myself next year I WILL own this watch

[Anonymous No.17543647]

>>17543644
U can follow the positions of the planets accurately and its just such a fucking cool watch

[Anonymous No.17543649]

>>17543629
You know people come on here at different times on different days

[Anonymous No.17543652]

>>17543572
not usually a fan of Rolex, but this purple dial Oyster looks nice. any cheaper alternatives?

[Anonymous No.17543653]

>>17543633
Sure they do. Nobody else is making a field watch with a T shaped time and date and screw down crowns. Nobody except Omega makes diving watches with dials textured with waves, and even then the pattern is different. And even the big luxury brands like Tudor all copy or "homage" Rolex shit. The only real difference is the price point. Nobody is going to find out your "rolex" is actually a Seiko or whatever, and Islander is putting their own branding on it so it's not even like they're trying to trick people with fake Rolexes. Why can Tudor and Davoso and others do it but some guy from New York can't?

[Anonymous No.17543656]

>>17543653
sorry, I messed up editing the post, I meant to say nobody is going to find out your Seiko or other watch that looks similar to a Rolex isn't a real rolex and get upset. And they shouldn't. There are only so many ways to make a fuckin dive watch, at some point they're going to look similar and have similar colors. It doesn't mean they aren't good.

[Anonymous No.17543657]

>>17543653
>>17543656
Yea but this one literally has a fake Rolex jubilee bracelet on it

[Anonymous No.17543659]

>>17543629
You're an anonymous guy posting pictures of a watch on an image board. That means two things:
>you can easily fool people about your watch
Replicas look really good in pictures, and I get why so many people think they're 1:1 replicas. The thing is, I've actually handled a few Rolex "super fakes" and they didn't make a good impression on me. The bracelet is not as crisp, the clasp doesn't feel like the real deal and there's always something slightly off in the proportions (my daily watch is a Rolex so I'm used to looking at it several times a day). You can make a $500 watch look like a $50k, but it will never feel the same for obvious reasons. I'm 100% sure it would be the same with your fake VC.
>you can easily fool people about yourself
Some anons in these threads actually own some very nice watches so I'm willing to believe you bought yourself a 50k Vacheron. If I knew you in real life, chances are I wouldn't believe you.

See that's the thing with fakes. They can fool a lot of people on social medias (including myself) because the reality is easy to twist on internet, but it's a lot harder in real life.

[Anonymous No.17543660]

>>17543652
Get a fake. This has been repped so well that the genuine version is now considered not worth buying in general.

Cost is $478 USD.

[Anonymous No.17543662]

>>17543652
Islander Brookville

[Anonymous No.17543668]

>>17543659
First of all, bullshit.

Second of all, how often are watch experts or owners of your exact model demanding that you take your watch off your wrist and hand it over to them? You’d have to be an autistic to believe that happens.

[Anonymous No.17543669]

>>17543644
>>17543647
Thats actually kinda fuckin neato on paper. I'm sure its a monumental pain in the dick to maintain semi-accurate plant positions without just leaving it on your watch winder at all times.

And that second pic makes the time really hard to read.

[Anonymous No.17543673]

>>17543659
>You can make a $500 watch look like a $50k, but it will never feel the same for obvious reasons.
I must be dense because they don't seem obvious to me. Please elaborate on these obvious differences.

[Anonymous No.17543681]

>>17543653
lol Mahk tried to mash together a 62MAS, a Rolex DeepSea Sea Dweller and an Omiwatari.

[Anonymous No.17543686]

>>17543662
>>17543662
>a SARB but with a fluted bezel
Mahk, stop it!

[Anonymous No.17543688]

>>17543668
So we both agree the point of owning a fake is to fool people, right? Let me ask you, who are you trying to fool with a fake $50k watch?
>your relatives
They know you can't afford it lmao
>women
Assuming they know the price of a genuine Vacheron, your lie will collapse the second they see your car or your apartment.
>rich people
They can spot people like you from a distance. Your clothes, manners and words you use will always betray you.
>watch nerds
They'll notice something's off just by looking at it.

[Anonymous No.17543699]

>>17543688
Nah the point is to own a watch with incredible design and finishing for $400 instead of $50,000.

Show me a $400 watch that’s as beautiful as the 2000V.

I assume even watch people will just think “oh cool an overseas he probably paid like $15K for that” - they won’t be familiar with the 2000V unless they’re a VC super fan.

As for lifestyle - my lifestyle does support owning a $15K watch. I’d just rather invest that money than waste it on a watch.

And I work exclusively with wealthy families in my profession so I’m not too worried about that. I wear a more modest watch to work - don’t want to appear too flashy in front of clients.

[Anonymous No.17543711]

>>17543673
Jeez I dunno anon, why do you think a $500 Seiko isn't as nice as $10k Rolex? Maybe it has to do something with the level of engineering, the time spent working on each watch, and the quality control?

[Anonymous No.17543713]

>>17543688
>They can spot people like you from a distance. Your clothes, manners and words you use will always betray you.
What if I put the cap sideways and just mumble MUHNIGGUH?

[Anonymous No.17543714]

[Anonymous No.17543716]

>>17543711
>>Jeez I dunno anon, why do you think a $500 Seiko isn't as nice as $10k Rolex?
LMFAO

[Anonymous No.17543720]

>>17543716
Fuck you.

[Anonymous No.17543721]

>>17543711
>Jeez I dunno anon, why do you think a $500 Seiko isn't as nice as $10k Rolex?
I didn't say that, you did. You are now attempting to explain precisely why that is. I genuinely don't know anyone that isn't satisfied with a $500 Seiko, and I DO know a lot of watch people including people who own Rolexes that will concede that when you buy one of the expensive luxury brands you're paying for the history and legacy than you are paying for the quality of the watch.

[Anonymous No.17543724]

>>17543699
>Nah the point is to own a watch with incredible design and finishing for $400 instead of $50,000.
Don't fool yourself. For $400 you have the finishing level of an Orient at best.
>Show me a $400 watch that’s as beautiful as the 2000V.
Personal taste is irrelevant to the discussion. I personally don't like the look of the Overseas.
>my lifestyle does support owning a $15K watch. I’d just rather invest that money than waste it on a watch.
So your lifestyle doesn't support owning a $15k watch.
I have 75k in savings. I can buy a Lange 1 Moonphase, but then I'd be left with 0 in savings, therefore I can't afford it.

[Anonymous No.17543726]

>>17543711
Look at this watch
>>17543716
If you put "Rolex" and a crown on this watch and gave it to someone to wear, some normal ordinary person, do you really believe they would know the difference? Would the difference even matter?

[Anonymous No.17543730]

>>17543724
I have a paid off home and a $1.7M portfolio.

I can buy the genuine watch and my annual income from investments will drop by about $500 or I can buy the fake watch and my annual income from investments will drop by about $14. Which is preferable?

[Anonymous No.17543735]

>>17543730
Oops, that’s $1750 and $14.
Tough choice.

[Anonymous No.17543749]

>>17543735
If you're independently wealthy and don't have to work, what does it even matter?

[Anonymous No.17543750]

>>17543749
Your a retard we play for the high score loser.

[Anonymous No.17543759]

>>17543750
You're not going to get the high score, but even if you did what would you win?

[Anonymous No.17543763]

>>17543730
>I have a paid off home and a $1.7M portfolio.
OK but you might be lying. You're wearing a fake $50k watch so I can only assume you're a pathological liar. Good for you if that's true though.

[Anonymous No.17543767]

>>17543628
if only it was 36mm

[Anonymous No.17543768]

>>17543763
Ultra-wealthy persons are usually sociopaths or psychopaths. The former are the ones that lie for fun.

[Anonymous No.17543771]

>>17543572
Probably my grail

[Anonymous No.17543772]

>>17543767
It would be too small, there's a lot of shit going on on that dial

[Anonymous No.17543774]

I have a small collection of 5 cheap quartz watches.
I liked the idea of having things that require little maintenance and I don't care about banging around.

Somehow, I'm drawn to the idea of owning automatics somewhat reluctantly (because I feel it's objectively worse tech).
But I'm thinking I could probably be happy with a watch collection of 3 automatics, total under 3k (which is like under half a month's salary for me).
Should I just splurge and get my "grails" in terms of looks even if they're shitty autos?

[Anonymous No.17543776]

>>17543572
>tfw never

[Anonymous No.17543781]

>>17543776
I think I saw an indian taxi driver wearing that

[Anonymous No.17543790]

>>17543763
Fair point I could be lying. This is an anonymous imageboard.

>>17543749
For the same reason people who work for a salary want a raise. More annual income.

I have a $1.7M portfolio. That produces about $60K in annual income.

Now let’s say I go buy a little collection f four $50K watches. Now my portfolio is $1.5M and it only produces $52,500 in annual income.

Or I could buy the reps and keep the $60L annual income. Sounds better to me.

[Anonymous No.17543794]

>>17543774
As tools for keeping time, yes, traditional clockwork is objectively inferior. Quartz is both much cheaper and keeps time better. But there's an art to old school watch making that is amazing and deserves to be preserved and appreciated. Part of what ignited my appreciation for watches was being gifted a watch with a slide rule bezel. I was like "wtf is this?" and learned all about slide rules and how to use them and I would practice using my watch bezel as a calculator in real time. I never saw anyone using these on watches or even talking about them before but I was enamored with it.

It's so amazing to me that over 100 years ago people figured out how to make a spring loaded device that could be wound out and would track time, then they minimized it to the point where you could put it on your hand, then they figured out how to make it wind itself just by wearing it. At the same time someone figured out you could do complex math and unit conversion by sliding two rulers next to each other. Then someone figured out you could minimize it by making the rulers circles that run inside of one another. Then someone figured out you could put THAT on a watch. It's a completely analog computer on your wrist that you could have had 50 years before smart phones and it doesn't use a single volt of electricity. It's amazing.

We live in a world where almost everything is disposable now, from products to entertainment. I want to have something real and amazing.

[Anonymous No.17543801]

>>17543794
cope

[Anonymous No.17543802]

>>17543794
40 years ago you could've had a watch on your wrist with an actual calculator on it, capable of far more complex calculations. The buttons were pretty hard to press though, you really needed a toothpick. Now everyone just carries around phones that can do all that shit trivially.

It's far more fantastical to me that people worked out electricity, and then figured out they could run that electricity through a piece of quartz for precision timekeeping. And a 40 year old watch that has never, and will never be serviced, still runs perfectly, probably better now than it did when it came out of the factory, because the quartz has aged and settled with time. I'm surprised modern zoomers aren't more amazed that a watch can last for a decade on a single coin cell, while their shitty phone can't last 3 hours of actual use.

[Anonymous No.17543807]

>>17543471
I had a dream that I suddenly become trapped in this underground, frosted over ice cavern. It seems like there was no way out and it was hopeless. I wondered around, freezing, until I sat on this iced-over couch. Realizing I sat on something, I reached down and realized it was a Patek Philippe watch. Not unlike OP's, but not really the same. I was so moved by it's beauty that I started to cry. It glowed brighter and brighter then suddenly the ice melted away and I was able to find an escape. One of the most bizarre dreams I've ever had.

[Anonymous No.17543809]

>>17543781
Based Indian taxi driver

[Anonymous No.17543810]

>>17543771
based. Breguet shits on almost everyone else when it comes to dial finishing. IDK why people prefer mediocre shit like modern Patek

[Anonymous No.17543815]

>>17543801
Oh, I assure you it's not cope.
>>17543802
You don't get it, but I already explained why you don't get it and that I acknowledge and accept that you don't get it. I know electronics are able to do all of that stuff and more much more easily, I already acknowledged that. It's just so amazing the stuff people came up with to do those things before. The things people are capable of.

[Anonymous No.17543821]

>>17543774
I think it's cool to own something truly analog. especially if it has a clear case back and you can see the mechanism pounding away when you take it off, it's just neat
of course they're less accurate, but most people just use watches as fashion accessories nowadays and don't really need to be accurate to the second

[Anonymous No.17543839]

>>17543815
>It's just so amazing the stuff people came up with to do those things before
Before what? A hundred years ago we had fucking industry. Like, what advancement are you talking about here? Gears? We've had them for THOUSANDS of years. Miniaturization required mechanical precision, sure, and a few advancements and new designs, but at the end of the day, it's all simple stuff once someone has thought of it.

I've got to ask, why watches? Why not other forgotten technology, why not the insane level of accuracy and precision used in mechanical switchboards with relays and mechanical memory storage because electronic memory was still a fantasy? All those advancements, relay banks that took up whole rooms chattering away, now all rusting in a scrapyard because it's utterly obsolete. Why not be fascinated with cuckoo clocks and other automata, many of which were one off designs using complex cams to achieve realistic looking motion with simplistic parts. If it HAS to be watches, what's so interesting about a basic automatic movement that has been done to death, over something like an Accutron which can no longer be built because the tooling required to produce the index wheels with teeth .02mm wide no longer exists, so a watch that beats over 300 times a second is no longer feasible. Oh, right, it uses scary electricity.

[Anonymous No.17543851]

who is this fucking faggot OP who seems to lose his shit a thread isn’t created with a specific image that he approves of or likes and then proceeds to open up another thread?

i know you’re reading this retard. you’re unironically fucking autistic.

[Anonymous No.17543854]

>>17543839
>>I've got to ask, why watches? Why not other forgotten technology, why not the insane level of accuracy and precision used in mechanical switchboards with relays and mechanical memory storage because electronic memory was still a fantasy?
Check this out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP5dfjxdkQ4

[Anonymous No.17543864]

>>17543839
Accutrons are fucking amazing and it makes me sad how incompetent the guys running bulova apparently are

[Anonymous No.17543868]

>>17543839
>Accutron which can no longer be built because the tooling required to produce the index wheels with teeth .02mm wide no longer exists
Presumably bulova can, since they made those 50th anniversary LE accutron 214 movments.

[Anonymous No.17543876]

>>17543839
Not that anon, but my fascination with them stems from finding that which can be achieved with an inferior, hopelessly obsolete technology very impressive, interesting and just plain beautiful in the case of watches. I take computers doing extraordinary things as a given; for example it isn't particularly mindblowing to see a quartz watch track the day, date, year and leap year over the course of a century. But a mechanical perpetual calender doing the same is absolutely incredible. It accomplishes that task with no electricity, no chips and no wiring, just mechanical parts and fine engineering. I have no bias against quartz and someday I'd like to own a nice super high end HAQ watch from Citizen or Grand Seiko but mechanical movements are cool too.

[Anonymous No.17543879]

>>17543507
Rolex Batman and no gun because I don't suck cock.

[Anonymous No.17543884]

>buy a fake
Don't fall for it. Be better than the average poortard.

[Anonymous No.17543892]

Thought one of you guys night be interested in this gorgeous Lacroix

[Anonymous No.17543894]

>>17543892
Oops, forgot link

https://www.ebay.com/itm/225491157279

[Anonymous No.17543897]

>>17543892
>>17543894
For those times you want to look like a wealthy octogenarian living in the late 1980s.

[Anonymous No.17543900]

>>17543884
I don't get why I should do it when there's plenty of good original designs for cheap. and plenty of beautiful vintage watches that you can get for pennies

[Anonymous No.17543908]

>>17543660
NTA, I have no issue with fakes from a moral standpoint but damn for $478 on geektime the purple OP looks like ass. Even from a distance you can see the hand finishing is shit and the macro shots make it worse. I'll probably be able to afford the real one someday so might as well wait

[Anonymous No.17543911]

>>17543653
>>17543594
>>17543631
mark, pls go

[Anonymous No.17543912]

Poor Alex Jones... doomed to an eternity of wearing a lowly HULK instead of a Daytona. SAY IT AINT SO

[Anonymous No.17543926]

why is he so based?

[Anonymous No.17543936]

>>17543926
the urban gentry? he hates omegay thats why

[Anonymous No.17543944]

i like these 70s 80s hard contrasty dials alot
which one should i get ? the first one is very tempting and it looks like the
seiko vanac. they're all the same price (not from india)

[Anonymous No.17543945]

>>17543926
>>17543936
TGV is a manlet with peasent complex.

[Anonymous No.17543962]

>>17543713
If you're tall they might be convinced you're a star basketball player.

[Anonymous No.17543998]

The watch which brings you joy is the best watch.

[Anonymous No.17544006]

Bread has returned. Long live the crust!

[Anonymous No.17544029]

>>17543594
Fix your heinous logo mark

[Anonymous No.17544034]

>>17543536
what do you mean $50000? it says $43.00

[Anonymous No.17544065]

>>17543839
>Once someone thought of it.
But before that someone had to think of it. Right?

[Anonymous No.17544069]

Omega should bring it back. How hard could it be to standup a production line for the 1511 calibre?

[Anonymous No.17544085]

>>17543724
>>17543688

[Anonymous No.17544104]

>>17544085
buy reps is super gay, but i once saw someone like this call someone out at a watch convention because they were wearing a fake/knock off of a well known watch strap brand.

not even the watch, but the fucking strap. but maybe i’m the gay one for being at a watch convention in the first place.

[Anonymous No.17544106]

>>17544104
Fucking kek

[Anonymous No.17544113]

>>17544069
No, they shouldn't. Citizen did one better. The original Omegas sucked batteries hard.

[Anonymous No.17544148]

[Anonymous No.17544228]

>>17544085
Imagine writing the lamest fanfiction ever just because you're too fucking poor to afford the watch you secretely covet.
LMAOSHMSFOAIDMT

[Anonymous No.17544233]

what is the name of the vintage seiko watch that requires you to turn it upside down for the date to change?

[Anonymous No.17544284]

>>17544228
Yet still more creative and productive than the pathetic mindbroken parrot who can only spam the word "poorfag" day in day out...curious!

[Anonymous No.17544332]

>>17543523
no one >loved it yesterday

[Anonymous No.17544352]

>>17543714
quackdy

[Anonymous No.17544369]

>Watch a TGV video from a couple of months ago
>Watch a TGV video from last night
>Wider jaw
>Raspier voice
>Worse hairline
Is this motherfucker on testosterone? Because it really seems like hes getting testosterone

[Anonymous No.17544371]

>>17544369
Yes? Everyone who isn't a retarded poorfag is lmfao moron. You can get TRT from any doc after 30 now.

[Anonymous No.17544375]

>>17544371
Well, he looks like shit now, so for me it's gonna be a pass

[Anonymous No.17544376]

>>17544375
Why your always gonna be a loready.

[Anonymous No.17544378]

>>17544376
Actually if you want to keep gold youthful looks you should get on estrogen early. Better hairlike, better distribution of fat and you don't lose your dick if you are careful.
It's easier to get it as a man than as a tranny, too, so you get to dab on them

[Anonymous No.17544384]

>>17544378
yEAH reeeeeeeeeeeetardoloooooool

[Anonymous No.17544390]

WHY ARE THERE TWO FUCKING WATCH THREADS?
WHY CAN'T JANNIES DELETE ONE OF THEM?
WHY DOES THIS HAPPEN SO FUCKING OFTEN?

[Anonymous No.17544395]

>>17544369
>google this guy because of your post
>cringe so hard i nearly fucking die
you fags dont really watch this do you?

[Anonymous No.17544404]

any sarb035 alternatives out there? need something similar size or smaller

[Anonymous No.17544405]

>>17544395
I do, it's funny. He even puts his Rolexes in a safe now, lel.

[Anonymous No.17544408]

>>17544233
First time i hear something like this.

[Anonymous No.17544412]

>>17543944
oh, that's a difficult decision, but going with your first instinct is probably best
got to admit, the lines and composition of top left, coupled with that flash of red on the crest, seem to make it the most coherent piece, so that would probably be my choice too

[Anonymous No.17544414]

Is there a widely available cool watch that looks like an Explorer, like the Seiko SARB was in the past? Not looking for something niche, just something recognizably nice.

I'm thinking 500-1000 range (otherwise if I wanted to spend more I'd get a Sinn).

[Anonymous No.17544421]

>>17544414
how about this Seiko Alpinist with the textured dial? I think it looks great

[Anonymous No.17544424]

>>17544395
I watch him because of the cringe, yeah
I have caught myself muttering "jingly jangly jubilee" or "donkeys years" and giggling like a retard a couple times

[Anonymous No.17544425]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEH2PnO-av4
Teasing for the new Rolex that'll be revealed next week.
>new Explorer (0:01)
>new Yacht Master? (0:03)
>something with an orange dial (0:05)
>gold GMT Master II (0:12)

[Anonymous No.17544435]

>>17544425
Also a new Cellini

[Anonymous No.17544437]

Any people from Italy who know where to buy cheap but not shitty straps? I like the leather ones, but they don't need to be true leather tbf, I just like the look and the feeling on my wrist and I want to cop some of them for the cheap watches.

[Anonymous No.17544438]

>>17544404
SBGX259

[Anonymous No.17544442]

>>17543557
based time stamp checking anon

[Anonymous No.17544446]

>the OP from the other thread is still seething

[Anonymous No.17544454]

>>17544437
yeah not in the third world lmfaoooooooooooo retard go to a real country lollll

[Anonymous No.17544457]

>>17544421
I'm looking for maximum versatility so I want to minimize colors that aren't black/grey/silver.

I also am afraid of alignment issues with newer Seikos, lots of reports on new Alpinists. Otherwise I LOVE how Alpinists look.

[Anonymous No.17544468]

Reminder,
Having a nice watch is completely pointless if you're fat. Anyone close enough to be able to see that your watch is nice isn't going to be thinking
>Nice watch
they'll be thinking
>Oh God, he smells like shit. He's so fat he can't wipe his own ass.

[Anonymous No.17544469]

which small cheap Seiko should I get?

>from the Essentials collection
>has sapphire
>quartz movement
>looks clean, but doesn't wow me. a little bland maybe?
>idk if the finishing on these is better than a Seiko 5 or not

[Anonymous No.17544471]

>>17544469
>a Seiko 5
>no sapphire
>automatic
>a bit more sporty
>more individual character but I kind of like the indices on the first watch more

[Anonymous No.17544473]

>>17544469
>looks clean, but doesn't wow me. a little bland maybe?
Isn't that the point? Just a nondescript watch. Nothing that stands out. Nothing that will ever get noticed.
>idk if the finishing on these is better than a Seiko 5 or not
They aren't.

[Anonymous No.17544475]

>>17544471
>Seiko Dolce
>found this for sale used for 200$
>beautiful textured dial
>high quality quartz movement
>the catch is I don't really need another dress watch, I need a sportier piece... and this 33mm watch 100% looks like a dedicated dress watch

[Anonymous No.17544490]

>>17543572
Big fan of the Odysseus, but I could barely even afford it at a 10th of the online prices, does anyone know a cheaper alternative? I'm thinking up to 8k as a celebration watch for finishing Uni, preferably made in Germany aswell, but that doesn't really matter

[Anonymous No.17544492]

>>17543851
>he unironcially wants to post on a thread with Aaron meroni
you’re the autistic one
I don’t care that I made this thread later than the original it’s so cringe like shut up

[Anonymous No.17544497]

>>17544454
Have a (You)

[Anonymous No.17544503]

Why are you all posting bottom of the barrel Seiko movement watches?

[Anonymous No.17544507]

>>17544469
>>17544471
>>17544475

Seiko's SNKL series isn't bad, the 23 has a smart tuxedo'd outer dial but you can also find it in white and silver i believe

[Anonymous No.17544511]

What is THE most perfect dress watch?

[Anonymous No.17544512]

>>17544490
There's not much that looks like that. The Odysseus was kind of designed to not look like anything else.

If you're looking for German, Glashütte Original actually makes great watches. The Seventies Chronograph is their luxury sports watch. (The caveat being that they may not be your style and the poorfags here will squawk at you for not being able to afford a Lange.)

[Anonymous No.17544513]

>>17544503
>why aren't you only posting my subjectively ideal watches

i'm not here to appease you faggot, people ask about seiko so the courteous thing is to answer. if you want to be a belligerent retard try /b/

[Anonymous No.17544514]

>>17544511
Piaget Altiplano

[Anonymous No.17544518]

>>17544514
Looks like MVMT shit.

[Anonymous No.17544519]

>>17544514
38mm is too large. Hands are disproportionately thin and indices are too long. Printed dial is ugly and double markers at 2 hour intervals from 12 look awful.

[Anonymous No.17544521]

>>17544519
The hands are also too short, especially given the ratio between the minute and hour hands

[Anonymous No.17544523]

>>17544518
>>17544519
>>17544521
Well they charge $30k for it, so they must be doing something right.

[Anonymous No.17544524]

>>17544518
All dress watches look like MVMT shit, unless you have a much more liberal interpretation of what qualifies as a dress watch.

[Anonymous No.17544525]

>>17544524
Not a single interpretation I've ever had in my life has been liberal.

[Anonymous No.17544526]

>>17544523
I can charge $100k for my cock, but unless someone pays me, I'm not exactly the world's greatest gigolo, am I?

[Anonymous No.17544527]

>>17544526
People do pay them or it wouldn't be on offer.

[Anonymous No.17544528]

>>17544527
You're right, they do sell (theoretically), but not for $30k.

[Anonymous No.17544529]

>>17544511
>What is THE most perfect dress watch?
There isn't one. No matter what you choose, there will be someone who will find something to criticise.

But here's a non-exhaustive list of greats.
- Cartier Tank Louis Cartier
- Patek Calatrava 5916
- Piaget Altiplano G0A29112
- Vacheron Constantin Patrimony Traditionelle 82172/000R
- A. Lange u. Soehne 201.027
- Chopard L.U.C. XPS 161948-5001
- Breguet Classique 5157

[Anonymous No.17544530]

>>17544528
That's an older model, to be fair.
Used dress watches depreciate like nothing else.

Where's the anon who paid 1500USD for a VC dress watch and tried to strut around here for a while wondering why no one else owned any "haut horolgie"?

[Anonymous No.17544532]

>>17544528
>a used watch made 20 years ago will cost less than a brand new watch
You make a good point, anon.

[Anonymous No.17544534]

>>17544530
>>17544532
Ok you smart aleck cunts, this still isn't $30k and there's still not one man on Earth who would buy such a thing.

[Anonymous No.17544540]

>>17544529

The Tank is the closest to perfect as it is unique in what it does. The rest of your list is downhill.

The 5916 is very nice yes, but too large. It's the worst model in the 96 lineage.

the Altiplano is a shitter for reasons mentioned in my previous post

The Vacheron is much too big and too bulky in front profile for a dress watch, it's inelegant.

The Lange is also too big, and isn't even the best dress watch they sell – that would be the 291.026, but the minute track is ugly. That's also one of the best currently for sale.

That Chopard is not a dress watch.

Breguet is beautiful but too big. The 5907 is the last great dress watch they made, the best being perhaps one of the "Empire" models.

[Anonymous No.17544541]

>gray dealers will unironically try to tell you that having replacement parts makes the watch a "fake"
I've been getting a lot of high-end watch dealer channels in my YT feed lately, and they all seem grubby kikes.

[Anonymous No.17544544]

>>17544534
Sorry, I got the price from their website and didn't realize the model I was looking at was one that had diamonds set in the bezel. Still, it's the same watch selling for $30k, and $12k for one without diamonds is still nothing to sneeze at. Think of the amazing watches you can buy for $12k.

[Anonymous No.17544546]

>>17544469
Take the solar quartz pill.

[Anonymous No.17544547]

>>17544534
>I don't like a thing
>This thing must be objectively bad and LITERALLY no one on earth could possibly like it
>Anyone who claims to like it is LITERALLY doing so only to fuck with me, personally.

Your autism notwithstanding, I actually have owned a few Altiplanos and still own one. They're great watches, and landmarks in ultra-thin design. I know they're not Reddit-approved but you'd be surprised how many watches are out there when you unplug yourself from the hivemind.

They're not great value but if I cared about that, all I'd have would be Daytonas and Pateks, and that's fucking boring.

[Anonymous No.17544548]

>>17544544
Exactly, and anyone with $12k to spend isn't lining up for shitters like Piaget when Patek, Vacheron and JLC are around the same price if not lower.

[Anonymous No.17544550]

>>17544547
Why not just get a Master Ultra Thin though? They're so much nicer, and cheaper.

[Anonymous No.17544551]

>>17544540
>anon likes the cheapest, most Reddit watch.
Imagine my surprise.

[Anonymous No.17544554]

>>17544548
But, as we already discussed, they clearly are. So you're still wrong. I don't know how to make it more clear for you - a company does not continue making a product that doesn't sell for decades.

[Anonymous No.17544556]

>>17544541
They’re definitely all super sleazy and wear sweatpants and hypebeast shit. Makes me embarrassed to like watches whenever I stop to think about it.

[Anonymous No.17544557]

>>17544550
>Why not just get a Master Ultra Thin though? They're so much nicer, and cheaper.

They're not as thin, despite the name, they're not that much cheaper in gold (I haven't looked up the price, but I think the retail on them is still around 20k USD) and looks are subjective.

[Anonymous No.17544559]

>>17544550
You could even get a 3796 for $12k
>>17544551
The Tank? I think it's ugly as shit. But it's undeniably well executed in how it leans into its grotesqueness. Makes it harder to criticise compared to the other watches that are trying for elegance.

[Anonymous No.17544560]

>>17544556
What about wearing sweatpants makes you irreputable?

[Anonymous No.17544562]

>>17544559
does it get boring being contrarian all the time?

[Anonymous No.17544563]

>>17544554
You're lucky Richemont doesn't break down their Annual Report by manufacturer, or I'd have figures to prove how wrong you are.

[Anonymous No.17544566]

>>17544563
Or you wouldn't, because you're wrong.

[Anonymous No.17544567]

>>17544566
Believe what you want to believe and buy whatever shitters you wish, just don't pretend like they're popular or desirable.

[Anonymous No.17544568]

>>17544567
I accept your concession.

[Anonymous No.17544571]

>>17544069
>>17544113
Would be this one?

[Anonymous No.17544578]

>>17544546
Take the solar radiocontrolled Casio pill.

[Anonymous No.17544581]

>>17544578
This watch is just uglier.

[Anonymous No.17544583]

What’s a good watch for a surfer? I need serious water resistance, not too clunky and able to take a lot of shock. If it could track tides that would be cool too.

[Anonymous No.17544584]

>>17544583
Casio G-Lide series is made for surfing. Even has a tide graph for knowing when the waves are good.

[Anonymous No.17544589]

I'm done with watches, at least until I can afford a Chronomat

[Anonymous No.17544592]

daily update

[Anonymous No.17544595]

>>17544592
Nice stainless watch, is it pretty waterproof?

[Anonymous No.17544610]

>>17544581
Citizen should have a simple solar radiocontrolled watch too, but I guess it's going to cost around 500 bucks

[Anonymous No.17544656]

>>17544571
The "bezel" is out of place.

[Anonymous No.17544669]

>>17544592
glad that you like it

[Anonymous No.17544676]

>>17544551
Reddit has better taste than this shithole that's for sure

[Anonymous No.17544677]

>>17544676
>Reddit has better taste than this shithole that's for sure
Feel free to go back and stay there.

[Anonymous No.17544685]

>>17544677
No I think I'll laugh at you in the WAYWT thread

[Anonymous No.17544687]

>>17544469
I just saw this thing IRL and the black version looks pretty fucking cherry with that sunburst and those markers. and it has sapphire... I think I'm getting one
surprised there's no hype for these at all considering that they look so much like a SARB and they're only 150$

[Anonymous No.17544692]

>>17544656
It's kinda beat up. Might take it to the watchmaker to see if he can unfuck it a little.

[Anonymous No.17544693]

>>17544581
There are other variants.

[Anonymous No.17544695]

>>17544685
OK, which one do you think is me?

[Anonymous No.17544697]

[Anonymous No.17544709]

>>17544693
Better, but the random LCD display is what ruins it.

[Anonymous No.17544714]

>>17544709
You get a lot of functionality in return. If you want one without the screen there is the Oceanus line, but they're more expensive.

[Anonymous No.17544716]

>>17544714
>but they're more expensive.
Expensive for a Casio, sure. By luxury watch standards, they're less than the cost of an OEM replacement strap.

[Anonymous No.17544720]

>>17544687
>surprised there's no hype for these at all considering that they look so much like a SARB and they're only 150$
Seiko has so many fucking references that they're constantly introducing/discontinuing without telling the public that building any kind of hype for any particular model is difficult.

[Anonymous No.17544723]

>>17544687
I think seiko are starting to feel the pinch of the chinks who can put out sapphire case watches for 100 bucks all day long.

[Anonymous No.17544733]

>>17544697
i really like the look of these

[Anonymous No.17544735]

>>17543507
5000u g shock and glock 19 gen 5
I have the g shock today because I'm working and the g19 is the only gun I carry.

[Anonymous No.17544739]

>>17544716
>They're cheaper than a patek phillip!
Woah, a casio is cheaper than a luxury watch? Why doesn't the world know this?

[Anonymous No.17544745]

>>17544733
Well then you should get one, they're not expensive.

[Anonymous No.17544746]

>>17544739
>haha, I can exaggerate what you said to ridiculous proportions.
Based retard

[Anonymous No.17544752]

>>17544746
Its what you said: that casio is cheaper than the strap for a luxury brand. Okay? And? Its like saying a set of Bugatti tires is more expensive than a Nissan. Alright? And?

[Anonymous No.17544765]

Why is Tudor pandering to Uber Eats niggas?

[Anonymous No.17544772]

>>17544733
Look for 6206 or 6218.

[Anonymous No.17544780]

>>17544752
And you felt the need to comment. Cool.

[Anonymous No.17544781]

>>17544780
i guarantee that poorfag just now learned how expensive oem replacement straps can be.

[Anonymous No.17544782]

>>17544780
you were rightfully called out for saying something dumb. Just take it and learn from it.

[Anonymous No.17544786]

>>17544720
true. still, some do manage it like the SNKL23 or 41
I've ordered a 41 but I think I'll return it and get this quartz one with the black dial instead. it just looks cleaner with the SARB-like markers and no extra text on the dial, seems slightly more premium. and I think sunburst looks better on black than white dials

[Anonymous No.17544787]

>>17544782
Nope, it's not dumb at all. Calling a Casio "expensive" is very relative. Expensive compared to a pack of gum or a blowjob from your mom, but actually pretty inexpensive compared to just about everything in the watch world.

Now sit down. Don't bother responding.

[Anonymous No.17544795]

>>17544786
>I've ordered a 41 but I think I'll return it and get this quartz one
Which one?

[Anonymous No.17544796]

>>17544787
You're too autistic to even be self aware of what you just typed out. Its like someone saying their little 2 horsepower fishing boat is expensive at $3000 new. Then you jump in and say Jeff Bezos' yacht cost much more so that little fishing boat isn't expensive. Yes, we know everything is relative. For watches, a $300 casio can be considered expensive considering it doesn't do anything other than solar power over their $50 watches. Pointing out there are worse watches for $50,000 doesn't make the $300 watches any less expensive.

Take the L, bozo.

[Anonymous No.17544799]

Any recommendations for a nice dress watch with this champagne colored dial? Looking for 36-38mm price isn’t really a problem here as long as it’s sub 10k

[Anonymous No.17544801]

>>17544720
>without telling the public
This. I've known from a guy from the Seiko importer that they're discontinuing the 5 a year before it was announced.

Should have bought all the Seiko 5's then. I'd made mad money now flipping them.

[Anonymous No.17544803]

>>17544796
>he's trying harder and harder.
Your next essay's going to be even longer, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.17544804]

>>17544799
Rolex Datejust, you can get one in steel, bi-colour or solid gold.

[Anonymous No.17544808]

Today's auction haul.

I want to restore it and flip it, but I fell into the same trap as with other auction watches. It's just nice enough IRL that I might keep it after restoration.

[Anonymous No.17544810]

>>17544796
Of course you responded, because you can't resist.
I'm very sorry you're poor and $300 is expensive to you. Your temper tantrum isn't going to do anything except provide the thread with entertainment.

[Anonymous No.17544811]

>>17544808
Neat.

[Anonymous No.17544813]

>>17544804
That is not a dress watch

[Anonymous No.17544814]

>>17544781
>i guarantee that poorfag just now learned how expensive oem replacement straps can be.
That's exactly what it is.

[Anonymous No.17544815]

>>17544808
It's from 1971, and I didn't realize this before it arrived, but it's a front-loader case. Neat.

Also being a frontloader it's pretty thin for a 70's automatic. 9,6mm on the highest part of the very slightly domed crystal.

The strap is non-genuine and atrocious. Not sure if these were on leather from the factory, but the case shape implies it. I think it mimics some contemporary more expensive GS/KS case.

>>17544811
Also got a 218 Accutron coming in.

[Anonymous No.17544816]

>>17544813
If he thinks the Breitling Super Ocean is a dress watch, a datejust definitely is.

[Anonymous No.17544817]

>>17544799
>Any recommendations for a nice dress watch with this champagne colored dial? Looking for 36-38mm price isn’t really a problem here as long as it’s sub 10k
That's a pretty tricky ask. Champagne dials aren't as popular as they used to be.
Your best bet would be looking at vintage pieces, but those will be closer to 34-35mm

[Anonymous No.17544820]

>>17544816
>If he thinks the Breitling Super Ocean is a dress watch, a datejust definitely is.
He didn't say it was. He just wanted that color dial.

>/wt/: remedial reading edition.

[Anonymous No.17544822]

>>17544816
I don’t think it’s a dress watch, that’s why I was looking for an alternative with a similar dial
>>17544817
It’s a shame because it’s such a lovely color

[Anonymous No.17544823]

>>17544803
I've had to pay chatGPT to give me a 10,000 word essay outlining how stupid you are.
>>17544810
You can always buy me a $300 watch if that kind of money is trivial to you.

[Anonymous No.17544825]

>>17544795
SUR319
it made a better impression on me IRL than the SNKL41. less cluttered dial, nicer indices, a bit more detail in the case finishing. it just looked a step above a Seiko 5 to me, despite being basically the same price nowadays. and sapphire glass to boot

[Anonymous No.17544826]

>>17544816
oh so you *are* a retard

[Anonymous No.17544827]

>>17544787
Ok but the conversation was initially about a cheap Seiko or Casio or whatever. The other anon recommended an Oceanus and said they’re more expensive, which they are. Then you started talking about luxury watch straps, I’d guess as some way to “subtly” flex, but that was basically a non sequitur and had zero relevance to the initial conversation about cheap Seikos. Now you’re just doubling down.

[Anonymous No.17544831]

>>17544825
Based, when I was in high school I got one almost exactly like that but with a date complication and about 20 years older. Since got almost exactly the same thing but the GS version.

[Anonymous No.17544835]

>>17544813
Yes it is. Also, there's no other champagne dials on the market that are 36-38mm, so he'll have to pretend it's a dress watch, put it on a leather strap.

[Anonymous No.17544842]

>>17544835
what has happened to this board?

[Anonymous No.17544843]

>>17544842
Are you going to suggest a watch or just bitch and moan?

[Anonymous No.17544849]

>>17544831
yeah I like that classic Seiko styling with those dauphine hands and faceted indices like the Grand Seikos and SARBs
and honestly with 100m of water resistance and sapphire, this thing would make a better beater than a Seiko 5 too

[Anonymous No.17544850]

To the anons fighting about the Casio (i don't want to quote every answer):

I was the one suggesting it originally. I think you're fighting without any reason for doing so, because you're both right; you usually expect Casio to have cheap prices with a nice quality. The Oceanus line is expensive compared to Casio standard prices, but it's still cheaper than luxury watches; it's a price point where you should look around and there are nice Citizen / Seiko / whatever brands with equivalent features. It's up to the anon to decide what's worth buying, depending on his financial situation and usage of the watch.
I like the Casio with the little digital display, but, coincidentially, a norme friend of mine said it was expensive for me this brand a couple of days ago, so there is some bias about them.

[Anonymous No.17544852]

>>17544714
Oceanus still not available in EU. Fucking casio.

[Anonymous No.17544856]

Rolex has always marketed the Datejust as a business/dress watch.
Datejust for middle managers. Day Date for CEOs.

[Anonymous No.17544866]

>>17544835
By the "classic" standard of a dress watch* it isn't. But, realistically, a Datejust is not going to raise any eyebrows as being out of place in all but the fanciest situations.

*precious metal (matching other metals in outfit), thin, no complications (small sub-second acceptable), white dial, leather strap (leather color matching belt and shoes), 32-36mm.

[Anonymous No.17544870]

>>17544856
>Day Date for CEOs.

The gold DD used to be called the Texas Timex because seemingly every single oilman wore one.

[Anonymous No.17544874]

>>17544870
Reddit factoid

[Anonymous No.17544885]

>>17544874
>t. I get frustrated when others know things I don't.

[Anonymous No.17544897]

Anyone who could help suggest me a day date watch that’s in Ukrainian or a way for me to have one made? There’s so many for a wide variety of languages but it seems impossible to find one for Ukrainian. Russian is close but it’s not accurate enough even abbreviated and I’m avoiding it due to the war

[Anonymous No.17544900]

>>17544870
And presidents.

Nowadays Timex is so shit though, that a Rolex owner would probably shiv you in the throat with a ballpoint pen for calling his watch that.

[Anonymous No.17544916]

>>17544571
Very nice watch. Spanish?

[Anonymous No.17544921]

>>17543513
Why get a branded fake then? Just get one without logo if you don't care for the brand...

[Anonymous No.17544922]

Watch seller, I'm going on a buying spree and I want only your strongest shitters.

[Anonymous No.17544928]

>>17544922
Christ Almighty, did they train an AI on old Japanese watch catalogs?

[Anonymous No.17544931]

>>17544772
thank you my friend

[Anonymous No.17544956]

>>17544922
LOL What website is this?

[Anonymous No.17544966]

>>17544765
It seems insane but when you talk to people who do Uber and grub hub type shit it's actually pretty shocking how many of them are professionals that already make good money that just want to make a little extra money. My cousin's husband is a well paid software engineer with nearly 20 years experience(he started working with his own dad's company when he was still very young so he got a head start) and he does Uber and Ubereats delivery in their Tesla. It's a real rogues gallery - you have desperate people that are nearly destitute that can't do anything else working with trust fund kids that just think it's a fun way to make a little extra pocket money. Imagine being so rich you work as a gopher for fun.

[Anonymous No.17544977]

>>17544799
GS has a few champagne dialed watches.

[Anonymous No.17545003]

>>17544977
How many different fonts can Seiko cram onto a single watch?

[Anonymous No.17545008]

>>17544977
That's not really a dress watch, though. It's 14mm thick. That's getting into Planet Ocean territory.

[Anonymous No.17545011]

>>17545003
something something visual balance.

I think its amazing people can only spot how many different fonts are on a GS versus cluttered nonsensical watches like >>17543794
or >>17543776.
>BUT AT LEAST THE FONTS ARE THE SAME
yeah with nonsensical shit all over it. Thank god they picked a consistent font for ugly.

[Anonymous No.17545018]

>>17544977
a far better example would be the SBGW235

[Anonymous No.17545034]

From 1979, have never worn it, what do? Replace strap (with what?) and wear it? Or only wear for special occasions? Or sell?

[Anonymous No.17545035]

>>17545034
Never worn it? Sell it. You won't miss it.

[Anonymous No.17545041]

>>17544916
Aye, hand-me-down from the 80's. Day is in english too.

[Anonymous No.17545043]

>>17545034
Cram it

[Anonymous No.17545047]

Why is everyone on here so hostile to each other

[Anonymous No.17545049]

>>17545047
Having a shitload of money and no kids does fucked up things to a person.

[Anonymous No.17545052]

>>17545047
Well, (luxury) watches are all about flexing, supposedly. So this is what you get.

[Anonymous No.17545058]

>>17545047
I'm still trying to figure out why I'm allegedly gay for carrying a handgun for self defense. Is it gay to not want to die in a random attack from a person or animal?

[Anonymous No.17545063]

>>17544390
There is an actual demented autistic retard who doesn't like it when a watch thread is made with an OP image he might not like. So he opens up a competing thread.

It's happened a few times already.

[Anonymous No.17545064]

>>17545058
You're talking about your gun on a watch thread. That's attention-seeking behavior. That's gay. The gun is incidental.

[Anonymous No.17545068]

>>17545064
Not really? People talk about all of their investment income and paid off houses and cars and doordash and shit in the watch thread, why is it attention seeking when it's guns?

[Anonymous No.17545073]

>>17545068
People talk about their investment income and paid off house in terms of their ability to afford a watch under discussion, or whether their lifestyle supports owning a replica of an expensive watch.

Explain to me how your pathetic manhood supplement of a gun is relevant here.

[Anonymous No.17545077]

>>17545073
Because carry guns are a classic staple of EDC discussion, as are watches. Also if watch people can make threads about watches on /k/ I don't see why people shouldn't be allowed to talk about guns and the watches and clothing combinations used with them in the /fa/ watch general. It belongs here more than it belongs on /k/, I'd argue.

[Anonymous No.17545078]

>>17545063
>There is an actual demented autistic retard who doesn't like it when a watch thread is made with an OP image he might not like. So he opens up a competing thread.
BASED.

[Anonymous No.17545081]

>>17545077
This isn’t an EDC thread. This is a watch thread.
If you want an EDC thread, make one.

[Anonymous No.17545083]

>>17545081
No.

[Anonymous No.17545085]

>>17545083
MODS

[Anonymous No.17545086]

>>17545083
is that a poor person’s watch?
looks like a poor person’s watch

[Anonymous No.17545088]

>>17545086
The less you spend on watches the more you can spend on guns. Then next month you can spend more on watches to compensate. It's an eternal and self-correcting cycle.

[Anonymous No.17545090]

>>17543473
Nice, would get it serviced and rekindled though

[Anonymous No.17545097]

>>17545003
Twelve, if you're lucky.
>It looks like dogshit after the second.

[Anonymous No.17545098]

Oneother day oneother chance to courrier my watch.

[Anonymous No.17545101]

>>17545011
Shut up, weebo

[Anonymous No.17545103]

>>17545058
Because you like to suck the penis.

[Anonymous No.17545112]

NEW THREAD
>>17545109
>>17545109
>>17545109
>>17545109
>>17545109

[Anonymous No.17545115]

Large cheap 50+ collection with multiple cases, these are the 6 "luxury" pieces. Will check /wt/ every once in a while, nothing ever really changes. The same eternal safe picks for people under a grand ad nosium. Watch world is very stagnant

[Anonymous No.17545219]

>>17545077
>>17545083
>it's /k/ day on /wt/
based

[Anonymous No.17545242]

>>17545068
People shouldn't talk about those things in a watch thread.

[Anonymous No.17545264]

gun people suffer the same disease so prevalent with watch people: they just have too many.
I only have my glock 19 which is my daily, and an old 1911 bequeathed by my grandpa that I keep by my bed.

[Anonymous No.17545559]

>>17545115
Nice selection.

>>17545264
Based

[Anonymous No.17545562]

>>17545077
>>17545083
>>17545219
No holster?

[Anonymous No.17545570]

>>17544852
It's not sold within the EU but you can easily order it from Japan.

[Anonymous No.17545893]

>>17544813
You are an idiot.