[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 279 KB, 2000x1334, Citizen-Caliber-0100-AQ6010-06A.012[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513339 No.17513339 [Reply] [Original]

+/- 1 second per year edition

> Poorfag guide: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

Previous >>17511097

>> No.17513349
File: 100 KB, 640x557, Seiko-Quartz-Caliber-9F62[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513349

it's gonna be a quartz boy summer

>> No.17513350

>>17513339
>flimsy little sliver of metal with faux geneva striping to cover the battery

dishonest watchmaking

>> No.17513360
File: 292 KB, 1302x696, 0100.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513360

>>17513339
>$17k for this
lol. lmao.

>> No.17513361
File: 1.54 MB, 4032x3024, y45d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513361

What watch box do y'all useth?

>> No.17513362

>>17513349
Thats the spirit, ill buy myself a chronomaster this year

>> No.17513366

Recommend me a non dress watch, budget around 7k

>> No.17513374
File: 73 KB, 900x733, americanpsychopatrickbateman[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513374

>>17513360
it's the price of perfection

>> No.17513379

>>17513366
Rolex Datejust, Oyster Perpetual or Explorer.
Maybe Cartier Santos.
Everything else is cope.

>> No.17513383

>>17513360
I mean, people pay 17k for a seiko, why not pay 17k for a citizen?

>> No.17513391

>>17513350
I mean it's still obviously the battery and you can't do real geneva striping on the battery itself, it's done purely for aesthetics so I don't see how it's dishonest

>> No.17513397

>>17513391
Because you're covering the battery to make it look like part of a mainplate/bridge.

>> No.17513400

>>17513361
A really shitty cheap one from Amazon that expects me to have an 11 inch wrist.

>> No.17513402
File: 149 KB, 1200x1200, site-ww-8203-bmb-1_1200px.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513402

are there any downsides to having your automatics out of juice for longer time periods? why would i want them on a winder? Are they only for people who are too lazy to set their watch?

>> No.17513403
File: 346 KB, 1536x1536, bulova-caliber-8137-1536x1536[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513403

quartz boy summer quartz boy summer quartz boy summer quartz boy summer

>> No.17513408

What would be the best gold-tone 36-38mm quartz watch?

>> No.17513409

>>17513402
Theoretically there is nothing wrong with leaving them powerless, but everyone knows that a car in regular use will keep running far longer than one sitting in a garage. Regular use keeps lubrication flowing and keeps everything "warmed up."

>> No.17513414

>>17513402
get it so you can larp as dr. strange

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDmjjrP-ofY

>> No.17513419
File: 1.02 MB, 1102x1102, SBGV238G[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513419

>>17513408
SBGV238

>> No.17513425

>>17513379
Santos is ugly as fuck.

>> No.17513427

>>17513419
2-tone is not gold-tone
Actually 2-tone is the epitome of pleb.

>> No.17513429

>>17513427
Gold-tone, if not real gold, is pure larp and cringe as fuck. Two-tone is at least honest, since no one thinks it's real gold.

>> No.17513430

>>17513408
Rolex 19018

>> No.17513432

>>17513429
>Gold-tone, if not real gold, is pure larp
Still better than the poorfaggy 2-tone. Just choose a fucking color or buy both.

>> No.17513433

>>17513409
But wouldn't keeping them moving all the time also wear them out faster. Shouldn't they just run every once in a while?

>> No.17513435

>>17513430
Looks like Royal Nautilus lol.

>> No.17513442

>>17513433
>Shouldn't they just run every once in a while?
Just like a car, yeah. I try to wind up my watches at least once a month.

>> No.17513468
File: 121 KB, 1024x640, Expedition_1200x1200 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513468

Heading out to Antarctica next month. Think I'm prepped?

>> No.17513471

>>17513339
quartz is king.

>> No.17513474

>>17513425
Your mom is ugly as fuck.

>> No.17513475

>>17513379
Why would you ever buy a Santos over a tank/ reverso

>> No.17513477
File: 3.61 MB, 1911x960, 9f.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513477

>>17513349

>> No.17513479

>>17513475
BECAUSE THE SANTOS IS A SPORTS WATCH AND THE TANK/REVERSO ARE DRESS WATCHES YOU DUMB NIGGER THEY ARE NOT IN THE SAME CATEGORY USE YOUR FUCKING BRAIN BEFORE POSTING A MESSAGE
Also the Reverso has a shit movement.

>> No.17513480

>>17513402
It’s more because complicated watches like annual or perpetual calendars or moonphases are very annoying to set.

>> No.17513482

>>17513479
>implying the Tank and Reverso doesn't dress down extremely well
Obsolete watch

>> No.17513485

>>17513391
>real geneva striping on the battery itself
That's the kind of autism i come on 4chan for.

>> No.17513490

>>17513468
Mount Everest is not on Antarctica, anon.

>> No.17513496
File: 227 KB, 2296x471, NIGGER.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513496

>>17513482

>> No.17513499

>>17513496
You can wear them as not dress watches

>> No.17513500

>>17513496
Reverso is not a dress watch. In fact it’s probably the most iconic sportswatch ever made.

>> No.17513501

>>17513499
THE ANON REQUESTED A NON DRESS WATCH WHY WOULD YOU RECOMMEND HIM A NON DRESS WATCH ARE YOU RETARDED, A NIGGER OR BOTH?????????????????????

>> No.17513504
File: 47 KB, 600x375, 7546 components.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513504

This is what the disassembled movement in my Type II looks like (not my actual watch). Not great, but not terrible either.

>> No.17513505

>>17513425
I like the santos cause that’s what Gordon Gekko wears

>> No.17513509
File: 35 KB, 750x750, 7ec4cf56-e221-4846-94be-1a9945248009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513509

>>17513500
Can definitely be made to look like one however

>> No.17513510
File: 201 KB, 1067x1600, vcosc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513510

brehs...

>> No.17513513

>>17513501
>limiting your choices based on arbitrary labels
We get it, you're some stickler autist

>> No.17513514

>>17513510
looks like a fucking Tissot lmao

>> No.17513515
File: 2.40 MB, 4000x3000, 20230303_131643.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513515

Poorfag here. This is all I need.

>> No.17513518

>>17513514
a lot of watches look like a lot of other watches
this is a sophomoric, glib, reductive comment which offers nothing of value
do better.

>> No.17513519

>>17513510
I’d respect VC a lot more if they just discontinued the modern Overseas abomination already

>> No.17513520
File: 106 KB, 600x600, Seiko_7546A_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513520

>>17513504
And apparently it has a screw so you can regulate it, i might fiddle around with it and see what happens. It currently runs slow at about 15s per month, not bad for a 45 year old budget movement.

>> No.17513522
File: 38 KB, 415x470, brainlet-log-head.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513522

>>17513513
>someone asks specifically for a non dress watch
>"DURRRRRR YOU SHOULD BUY THIS DRESS WATCH THAT I LIKE"
Holy shit the retards in these threads

>> No.17513525

>>17513522
>nooo you can't think for yourself
>soijak.jpg

>> No.17513528

>>17513518
Okay but it still looks like some generic Tissot.
The Royal Oak looks like the Royal Oak.
The Nautilus looks like the Nautilus.
The Overseas looks like a Tissot.
Get it now?

>> No.17513529
File: 653 KB, 4093x2746, GBLT998ajpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513529

>>17513519
so you want a modern watch with classic sensibilities which fuses the elegance of minimalism with the boldness of restrained creative flair
say no more flam

>> No.17513533

>>17513522
My point is, imbecile, that you recommended an extremely ugly watch that is upstaged by the Tank and Reverso in every way possible. They are 90 percent the same and yet the Santos is far uglier and inferior

>> No.17513534
File: 2.50 MB, 3000x3000, watch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513534

>>17513339
The majority of this forum user base is men - and we’re all friends here. I enjoy being able to relate to other men openly, honestly, emotionally and sexually. I have many other hobbies and pursuits, but I find that only the watch collecting community allows to me to hang my laundry while I water the garden, if you catch my meaning. There’s no judgment or casting aspersions. You all allow me to speak frankly and candidly, whether it’s simple hypotheticals, locker room talk or something mysterious and deeper.

I have made many intimate, sensual connections with other men on this subreddit. I’m heterosexual, but I’ve never returned postage back to the sender. Why should I feel intimidated or put out if one of you contacts me privately, to share their watch collecting experiences?

I am a very sexual being. Looks aren’t everything. The sexual, spiritual contact being made is enough to satiate me. Now, if a consenting adult wants to arrange a personal meet up where we meet face to face and something more physical and erotic develops…who is to say that’s wrong?

Certainly not me. I’m old school, I don’t judge other men or turn my nose up to sensual words of affirmation. If another man expresses desire for me - even though I’m not that way - why should I (a confident and secure man) ever be upset or put out?

I’m rock steady.

>> No.17513535

>>17513525
You're not "thinking for yourself" you dumb nigger.
You're a literal retard who can't understand a basic question.
If someone asks recommendations for a sports car will you just tell him to buy a Rolls Royce because you like these cars?

>> No.17513537

>>17513518
This one really looks like the PRX Chrono tho

>> No.17513538
File: 1.33 MB, 1984x1074, shoo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513538

>>17513528
please stop talking

>> No.17513540
File: 263 KB, 1000x1000, ocean_39_._904.12.1623144271.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513540

Thinkign of getting one of these :)

>> No.17513542

>>17513540
wow did rolleggs air king steal this design XDDDDDDDD

>> No.17513544

>>17513533
>They are 90 percent the same
Yeah?

Santos
>steel bracelet
>100m water resistance
>automatic
Tank/Reverso
>leather bracelet
>30m water resistance
>hand-wound

Now kys retard

>> No.17513547

>>17513534
That's a lot of words, you could have just said you're gay.

>> No.17513548
File: 700 KB, 2048x2048, DSC_0441.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513548

>>17513535
Oh wow bro I didn't know that one of these was a sports car and the other was a Rolls Royce

>> No.17513550

>>17513538
These are trying to look like RO/Nautilus.
The Overseas has no personality. It doesn't even look like a Vacheron.

>> No.17513552

>>17513544
>Water resistance
>mechanics
Those are differences in aesthetic? You're so unbelievably unfunny.

>> No.17513554
File: 639 KB, 960x960, image_2023-03-03_193205866.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513554

I'm not a fan of the fomo shit watch companies do.

>> No.17513557
File: 63 KB, 690x1050, topic106_01_sp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513557

bros...

>> No.17513558

>>17513510
Dial is too small for the case.

>> No.17513559
File: 108 KB, 1080x1080, santos_de_cartier_medium_model_1645360096_3295f8c9_progressive.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513559

>>17513548
>he doesn't even know the Santos Dumont and the Santos are two different watches
Embarrassing.

>> No.17513560

>>17513552
what the fuck am i reading????

>> No.17513562
File: 40 KB, 640x480, sddefault[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513562

>>17513540
Get a Pagani Design for way cheaper.

>> No.17513564
File: 1.41 MB, 3024x4032, j88u8gi9t1b91.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513564

>>17513552
Explain how these 2 watches are "90% the same"

>> No.17513567

>>17513552
>upstaged by the Tank and Reverso in every way possible (This is (You))
>Other Anon lists many ways the Santos upstages the Tank/Reverso
>That's not aesthetics!

Simple question - Are you retarded? We should get that sorted before moving on.

>> No.17513569

>>17513564
Square, identical faces, Cartier, can be had with same strap

>> No.17513570
File: 1.95 MB, 1440x814, 3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513570

>>17513550
>Bulova copies RO
>Piaget copies PPN
>VC is copying the Tissot even though the cases are radically different, and the marker faceting/finishing is different
I see your point but I would argue the OS case is iconic in its own right

>> No.17513571

>>17513554
That looks awesome. What's the fad?

>> No.17513572

black or brown alligator leather strap for a dress watch?

>> No.17513574

>>17513567
It was purely based on one being dress and one not being dress. Can you read?

>> No.17513577

>>17513570
iconically ugly

>> No.17513579

>>17513571
the 2000 piece limited edition fad i assume. i refuse to ever spend money on one, which isnt hard because most are tacky anyways.

>> No.17513580

>>17513572
Depends on the dial and your clothes.

>> No.17513582

>>17513479
the reverso is a sports watch moron.

>> No.17513583
File: 1003 KB, 3439x2579, Sinn U-50.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513583

>>17513522

>> No.17513584
File: 318 KB, 1500x1000, Vacheron-Constantin-Overseas-Automatic-4500V-10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513584

>>17513577
maybe, but still a look all of its own. I'd have to see it in person to see how it flows with the underlying part of the bezel

>> No.17513585

>>17513552
>>17513560
>>17513564
>>17513567
STFU you're ruining the thread

>> No.17513586

>>17513579
I see, you meant FOMO as in limited run. I agree that it's annoying, and even though that watch is cool, black PVD or DLC coating IS a fad, and I won't buy a black watch.

>> No.17513591

>>17513479
>Reverso has a shit movement.
you have no idea what you're talking about

>> No.17513596
File: 3.96 MB, 1800x1200, hmm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513596

do you unironically need more than 1 luxury watch? isn't it a bit like owning more than 1 luxury car? the only way I see it being useful is if you use the additional watches as investment vehicles

>> No.17513598
File: 1.18 MB, 1766x2649, GettyImages-930170708-crop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513598

>>17513479
You can definitely wear the Santos as a dress watch and the Reverso as a sports watch
Even Muhammed Ali wore the tank casually

>> No.17513600

>>17513596
Anything over a 3 piece collection is too much. 4 would be my absolute maximum, but that fourth watch is probably a dress watch that I'd never wear. So yeah, 3 watches is ideal.

>> No.17513603

>>17513600
I could see a Patek, Rolex, or ultra-limited model from a third brand increasing in value, but even then, you could 10x your return through the stock market in a fraction of the time.
I agree with you, if I had the money and purely bought the watches as my own toys, I'd probably own 3-4 super flexes that I'd rotate.

>> No.17513604
File: 468 KB, 843x866, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513604

>>17513596
You are making me rethink my order for this that's on its way.

>> No.17513606

>>17513603
Oh, I didn't really realize you said "luxury." I'll probably never own a luxury watch, and even if i did using them as investments is obviously retarded. No fucking way would I speculate on a watch lol.

>> No.17513610
File: 1.55 MB, 3024x4032, 34fg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513610

>>17513596
I love that box.

>> No.17513611
File: 843 KB, 1500x1125, IMG_8003.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513611

What do you think of the Glock watch

>> No.17513613

>>17513611
Pretty cool. I'm just thinking how cool that green one would look hydro-modded.

>> No.17513615

>>17513596
>do you unironically need more than 1 luxury watch?
Of course not. But, this being /fa/, certain watches go better with certain outfits. I think the mininum number of watches to cover as many bases as possible is two or three.

>> No.17513616

>>17513610
Why does anyone want THAT many watches

>> No.17513617
File: 1001 KB, 1000x1000, 34.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513617

>>17513606
I own a GS and also have a Rolex & Tag that my dad gave to me. the only watches I would truly want are probably a Milgauss and Credor Eichi II. However, that's about $60-70k that I could otherwise spend on actually investment vehicles, so unless I end up becoming absurdly rich I'll probably never do it.
>>17513604
>>17513615
To each his own. There is certainly a joy to collecting. I could very well criticize myself for owning a fine press literature collection when I could not have spent $40k on that and instead just read everything through Kindle.
>>17513610
I like rotating watch boxes, but then it becomes less of a private container and more of a display piece.

>> No.17513627
File: 124 KB, 680x680, 135.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513627

> ackchyually the Reverso is a sports watch
This meme needs to die.
First it was created when sports watches weren't even a thing.
Second, I'm 100% sure no polo player ever wore a Reverso on the field.
It was just a marketing thing from JLC.

>> No.17513628

>>17513616
collecting impulse/addictive personality
it's an impractical number of watches and it would be surprising if the collection as a whole retains its value, much less increases

>> No.17513630
File: 551 KB, 1600x1200, s-l1600[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513630

>>17513611
Why did you show this to me, Anon? I don't need an $800 Glock watch, but I fucking want it.

>> No.17513631

>>17513627
>when sports watches weren't even a thing
Yes it's called being the first thing

>> No.17513636

>>17513591
>3Hz
>40h power reserve
>no shock resistance
>no anti-magnetism
>no COSC certification
OHNONONONO HAHAHAHAHAHAA
Any ETA movement is better than the one in the Reverso lmao

>> No.17513638

Thank you anon who suggested Cartier Santos, I am looking at maybe the blue dial large model or an explorer.

To those that suggested the tank/reverso, the tank is very dressy and quite frankly an incel watch, reverso not quite but still too dressy for what I’m looking for.

>> No.17513641

>>17513617
>"jarvis I'm going to a lunch with the executive team and possibly drinks after. choose a watch for me"
>analyzing latest men's health covers for the most current styles
>scanning body for best watch size distribution
>loading executives from database and cross-checking watches worn in past appointments
>adjusting bracelet links to account for the recent bodyfat % loss
>UV sanitizing watch
>recalibrating time to the nearest millisecond for target timezone
>your watch is now ready

>> No.17513642
File: 588 KB, 615x340, Lord Byron Woodring.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513642

>>17513627
According to /wt/ this is a sport watch.

>> No.17513643

>>17513631
lmao no
The Reverso brought nothing new to the table. It was a standard watch with some gimmick used as a marketing trick.
Do you UNIRONICALLY believe polo players wore a Reverso on the field? FUCKING KEK

Sports watch = metal bracelet + water resistance
The Reverso has none of these.

>> No.17513644

>>17513638
>quite frankly an incel watch
You can stop pretending now

>> No.17513646
File: 1.06 MB, 2165x3055, E3AFD9B6-93B1-44AF-8006-1C78288BA5E6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513646

>> No.17513647

>>17513643
>It was a standard watch with some gimmick used as a marketing trick.
Like every other watch then

>> No.17513650

>>17513643
>Do you UNIRONICALLY believe polo players wore a Reverso on the field? FUCKING KEK
Never said that.

>> No.17513651

>>17513627
>I'm 100% sure no polo player ever wore a Reverso on the field.
whether it failed as a sports watch or not is irrelevant to the question if it is one

>> No.17513654

>>17513646
nice watch, anon. wear it in good health. I hope it's keeping time perfectly

>> No.17513655
File: 522 KB, 1200x1600, 94CF2017-A067-491D-9A18-5C1599FE1577.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513655

>>17513644
Nope, I’m the op of the question. This would look stupid if not paired with a suit like an incel wearing a fedora with his t shirt and cargo shorts

>> No.17513662

>>17513655
>if not paired with a suit
But if you pair it with a suit there's nothing better

>> No.17513664

>>17513655
I think you could still wear it with relatively formal Sunday wear

>> No.17513668
File: 50 KB, 800x800, 2d16156d96f323b30993a9f4d1e48c2ab6f4ae8ee20cfd597c09e7046664da02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513668

I wasn't aware the Reverso was so controversial. Should I still look at picking one up?

>> No.17513670

>>17513646
Is that a 61GS? Nice.

>> No.17513672
File: 2.10 MB, 360x360, 1674492593130397.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513672

>crown at 12o’clock

>> No.17513676

>>17513662
>>17513664
I’m sure it would look very nice with formal wear, but I’m looking for something I can wear with with a sweater and jeans or on the beach

>> No.17513683

>>17513668
You really shouldn’t listen to anything this general says, 95% can’t afford or pronounce Jaeger-LeCoultre. Listen to them about Casio maybe.

>> No.17513685
File: 2.16 MB, 3072x4080, PXL_20230303_193426111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513685

Straps came in. I'm liking the way perlon wears.

>> No.17513687

>>17513668
>I wasn't aware the Reverso was so controversial.
It's one guy who hates it for some reason. Don't worry.

>> No.17513688

>>17513683
lmao imagine gatekeeping frog pronunciation you dweeb
most people who own rich shit don't know how to pronounce it. go cope as an academic somewhere else lmfaooooooo
i'm sure you'll get a 90% discount at the JLC AD if you show up with your best practiced french ROFL

>> No.17513694

>>17513683
have you been around rich suburban boomers? it's "Hermies" and "Louie Vitton" and "Patick Fa-leap"

>> No.17513701

>>17513683
>pronounce Jaeger-LeCoultre.
SHAY-shay la-COOT

>> No.17513706

>>17513701
more like "Zje-zje Le-Cool-twruh"

>> No.17513713

zhe zhe le qu

>> No.17513715

>>17513713
we should all start calling it ZZ so tourists have no idea what we're going on about

>> No.17513716

>>17513630
makes sense, a shitty watch to go with your shitty gun. the swiss are really just a better version of austria alltogether, aren't they

>> No.17513719

>>17513654
Thanks anon. It’s not quite perfect for accuracy but for a 50 year old watch I really can’t complain.

>> No.17513720

>>17513715
the last thing i need in my life i need is to share slang with a bunch of autists that have the same embarassing niche interest as me

>> No.17513723

>>17513720
ayo this nigga aint got no riZZ lmao

>> No.17513725

The Explorer is so fucking ugly oh my god

>> No.17513732

>>17513725
nah its biggest fault is being boring and inoffensive

>> No.17513733

>>17513670
It’s a 45GS 4520-8000.
Manual wind, no date. I believe the 61GS was an automatic.

>> No.17513734
File: 2.72 MB, 2000x1000, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513734

Help me decide, /wt/!

>> No.17513735

>>17513598
This example is so gay, some skinnyfat pasty internet watch nerd is NOT Muhammad Ali.

>> No.17513748

>>17513734
I'd go with the classic, it's more versatile.

>> No.17513755

>>17513734
left for casual (hiking, biking, etc.)
right for semi-casual (BBQs, parties, PTA meetings, etc.)
neither for dress

>> No.17513758

>>17513755
I'm looking for casual. Already secured my dress for the office with a bracelet.

>> No.17513761

>>17513735
You can still wear it casually. I'm not skinnyfat or pasty, you should go and sort that out

>> No.17513762

>>17513366
Chopard L.U.C GMT One
Hermès H08
Cartier Calibre De Cartier Diver

>> No.17513770

>just found out today that people finance their watch purchases
some relatively successful comedian on Joe Rogan was talking about how he's still paying off his watch
I made $130k last year and bought my $10k watch with full cash while dudes that are making more than me are apparently going into debt for their watches. wtf?

>> No.17513785
File: 720 KB, 828x1426, CBFD77A5-609E-4953-9CB0-7FFCEF23707F.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513785

>>17513770
It’s almost as like we don’t all make 130k/yr

>> No.17513786

>>17513770
I don't think you understand how rich people operate. They take loans and finance shit all the time because their cash has more value than your cash at any given time.
$10,000 in your wallet is worth less than $10,000 in an investor's wallet.

>> No.17513787

>>17513770
Makes sense to finance something like a patek if you're worried about the opportunity cost. I wouldn't do it but I can see why you would if you were about to spend $100k+ on something complicated.

>> No.17513788

>>17513770
At a low enough interest rate there is no reason not to finance and have that 130k to invest towards whatever

>> No.17513793

>>17513770
frenchtard anon you make $18k a year and bought your explorer used for $4k

>> No.17513796

>10$ aliexpress omega clasp works perfectly fine
Holy shit

>> No.17513800

>>17513793
you got the wrong guy. anyway, it's not about me but about financing high-end watches as a viable strategy

>> No.17513814

>>17513534
>All that wall of text just to say you like Grand Seiko.
You could have just said it.

>> No.17513821

>selling one of the rarest games for $5k
>still can't justify buying a rolex
fuck i hate being a stingy cunt

>> No.17513826
File: 1.44 MB, 2591x1943, 20230303_092616.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513826

>> No.17513829

>>17513821
Sucks to suck I guess.

>> No.17513830

>>17513580
white dial; casual or business casual.

>> No.17513832

>>17513821
put that money into $GME and thank me later

>> No.17513838

>>17513832
lol

>> No.17513854
File: 46 KB, 153x114, hgfbv.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513854

>>17513826
Damn what a mess this is.

>> No.17513855

>>17513668
First of all, if you're buying a Reverso at least get the one with the small second. That one looks cheap.
And it depends. As a second or third watch, sure why not. As a daily? Don't. The movement inside is terrible (and quite frankly a shame for a brand like JLC).

>> No.17513856
File: 3.84 MB, 1624x1624, eichi.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513856

>>17513838
>he doesn't have at least $10k worth of moon tickets
oh no no no no no
my average buy is $150 and I didn't sell all the way at $330. soon we will ride to Valhalla and I will be able to buy the CEII

>> No.17513858

>>17513830
Well you can't miss with black, but brown could work as well. Go to a boutique and try a few straps in person.

>> No.17513859

>>17513830
I think black strap white dial works best. I think the brown works better with a gold dial. But I don’t think there’s any set in stone rule.

>> No.17513863

>B-but muh-hammed ali wore a tank!
If he wore stilettos, would that make them not feminine dress shoes?

>> No.17513866
File: 2.13 MB, 1440x2560, GF_reviews_watches_1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513866

>>17513863
Based cartier hater. We need to band together.

>> No.17513868

>>17513863
>>17513866
Only makes it more ultra based in my opinion

>> No.17513872

>>17513855
The small seconds is ugly
>As a daily? Don't. The movement inside is terrible
It's a piece of jewellery.

>> No.17513874

>>17513854
Problem?

>> No.17513878
File: 1.18 MB, 2999x4499, SIPA_00269494_000017.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513878

>>17513863
Is that an issue?

>> No.17513880

>>17513866
>Speedmaster looks grown up
>Moony mcmoonface
Where did you find that, Reddit?

>> No.17513881
File: 2.59 MB, 1440x2560, GF_reviews_watches_2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513881

>>17513880
Unironically, yes.

>> No.17513884

>>17513872
>It's a piece of jewellery.
No, it's a watch. Its purpose is to give you the time. The Reverso is pretty bad at that.

>> No.17513885

>>17513881
Then go back

>> No.17513887
File: 14 KB, 420x236, pixel-7-pro-watch-lanxon-promo-25.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513887

>>17513884
And these are even better, once again confirming that modern watches are just pieces of jewellery

>> No.17513889

>>17513887
actually my Spring Drive is better. I've gained 3 seconds on my S10 Galaxy since last week

>> No.17513891

>>17513887
>And these are even better
No. I don't wear my phone on my wrist.

>> No.17513892

>>17513891
You've got one in your pocket

>> No.17513903

>>17513885
Yeah go back up your mom's cunt you dull prick

>> No.17513905

>>17513884
So there's no good reason to not buy one as my main watch right

>> No.17513906

>>17513903
Don't be such a bitter crybaby about nobody liking you

>> No.17513909

>>17513905
Do whatever the fuck you want.
Personally I think asking 10k for a 3Hz movement, only 40h of PR and no shock/magnetism resistance is revolting.

>> No.17513911

>>17513906
Projection, I'm not the one desperately needing to fit in on an anonymous Tibetan tea drying forum by obsessing about outsiders i.e redditors

>> No.17513915

Wow what an excellent general, just autistic poors stepping on each others' hands for no reason. Have any of you actually owned any watches? Can't comment on any watches without any personal digs?

>> No.17513916

>>17513915
I own $20k worth of watches. how may I help you, sir?

>> No.17513919

>>17513916
Show us them

>> No.17513920

>>17513887
We wouldn't have these retards on /g/

>> No.17513923

>>17513920
By far the worst board on this website. Just take one look at WAYWT to see who's writing these posts

>> No.17513924
File: 3.33 MB, 2572x1092, 4wt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513924

>>17513919
pic related. also have some cheaper ones.

>> No.17513925

>>17513889
>I've gained 3 seconds on my S10 Galaxy since last week
Don't phones sync time with the network constantly?

>> No.17513932

>seiko
>tag
>omega
>rolex
>tudor
>grand seiko
>citizen
>casio
scam brands for libtards

>> No.17513934
File: 237 KB, 1290x1275, [Seiko] SRQ029 Chronograph panda.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513934

Crispy

>> No.17513939

>>17513909
I'm not buying new
I agree that 10k is a rip, 3k is more reasonable

>> No.17513955

>>17513934
scam

>> No.17513961
File: 1.46 MB, 3840x2160, (You).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513961

>>17513955
In what sense?

>> No.17513982

>>17513924
>anon posts pic at request
>no one comments
it's like /wt/ only cares about exposing people as frauds due to self-hatred instead of having a gentlemanly discussion about watches and collections

>> No.17513984

>>17513770
It's not financed. Rich fucks spend huge sums, like $130k, on a watch and pay the store in installments. No one has that much liquid cash at any given time and dealing with bank transfers is a pain in the ass on both ends.

>> No.17513990
File: 555 KB, 900x900, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17513990

Thoughts on this situation? Thinking of getting it for my wife's sister.

>> No.17513991

>>17513924
I've never seen a Rolex without a Cyclops before

>> No.17513996

>>17513982
/wt/ is always garbage, it's just people making fun of other people about watches they will never own. This thread alone has just been one giant argument over the Reverso and Santos, of which nobody on here owns either of.

>> No.17514002

What is a simple military watch that goes with anything? Preferably GMT but doesn't really matter. In before G-Shock.

>> No.17514015

>>17513996
Congressman George Santos owns a Cartier Santos. You should call his DC office and ask him if he likes it.

>> No.17514024

>>17513984
>No one has that much liquid cash at any given time

Are you daft? You just run it on a credit card

>> No.17514025
File: 334 KB, 1080x788, Screenshot_20230303-225124~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514025

>Santos without the screws
Worth looking at or not?

>> No.17514030

>>17514024
Yes, that's how it's done. Also not liquid cash.

>> No.17514032

>>17513540
It's good however I have a similar Steingart from a few years back and the bezel is pretty much useless as it doesn't like to turn. If you want a functional bezel this might not be the correct watch. Idk if the issue has been taken care of since.

>> No.17514038

Have left my DW5600 in the shower lots of times and also worn it swimming, it has a bit of leftover water salt residue in the recesses of the strap, how do I get rid of it ?

>> No.17514075

>>17513924
>>17513982
Gay Sexko and Tag Huehue are not a things you should brag about.
It's just embarrassing.

>> No.17514077

>>17513990
Looks shit she will also hate the font

>> No.17514087

>>17514075
don't worry about what I'm wearing. focus on yourself

>> No.17514094

>>17514087
Nah, the guy's """collection""" ended up being a single older model he bought used and a bunch of dogshit. Tell us again when we're supposed to respect this guy?

>> No.17514098

>>17514094
>single older model he bought used
I respect that

>> No.17514099

>>17513982
Why would I comment on shitty watches I've seen a billion times that every rich retard has in their "le collection" just like every other rich retard?

>> No.17514103

>>17514098
Not all of us come so cheap.

Just out of curiosity, are you Filipino?

>> No.17514104
File: 2.99 MB, 4032x3024, 1643838295894.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514104

>> No.17514106

>>17514103
No, out of curiosity, do you actually own any watches?

>> No.17514107

I want a quartz aqua terra

>> No.17514110

>>17514094
>>17514103
why do weirdos like you come here to larp and act superior when you're living on neetbux or minimage wage
there is a reason you spend your days on slow-moving 4chan generals, and it's not because you have amazing taste or a good life or valid opinions

>> No.17514112

>>17514110
To shit on that one retarded piece of shit who has $1mil in watches.

>> No.17514113

>>17514110
Shout out to how Rolex Explorer anon is too poor to travel, he said he sacrificed a vacation for his Explorer ROFLMAO

>> No.17514115

>>17514112
and you wear a used poopy explorer, so what frenchtard? go jerk off to your bois imperial

>> No.17514116

>>17514112
but the thing is you're trying to "shit on" someone who has much more than you. you are in no way superior to that person. all you do is window shop through others. it's fucking pathetic

>> No.17514119

>>17514116
>LE I HAVE MONEY I AM LE BETTER
Lmfao.

>> No.17514123

>>17514112
Fat Mortadello hasn't been here in weeks...

>> No.17514124

>>17514119
what do you have? you post here all day and try to put others down because you're miserable and insecure. by no qualitative or quantitative metric are you better than a vast majority of people

>> No.17514126

>>17514124
What do you have? What watches make you so great? A used mass-market Rolex and some shitters?

>> No.17514127

>>17514119
This but unironically

>> No.17514128

>>17514099
Jelly poortard alert
Is your minimum wage day over yet?

>> No.17514135

>>17514124
I have a functional brain kekkerino retardino lmfao.

>> No.17514136

>>17514128
Not for nothing, but I'll admit to stoking poor vs. rich conflict in this thread for my own amusement,

>> No.17514138
File: 2.23 MB, 1440x3040, boss.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514138

>>17514126
a 6-figure job, a loving family, and a non-miserable disposition. I love my GS and couldn't care less about your opinion of it. the Rolex is a heirloom from my father. when was the last time your boss or anyone else told you something like pic related?

you're down so bad that you don't even realize how much of a loser you come across as

>> No.17514139

It's funny how Frenchtard used to larp as being the richest man on here and then lawyer anon showed up and he had a mental breakdown in multiple generals.

YOU'RE POOR AND FRENCH AND HAVE A 1080P MAC LOL

>> No.17514140

>>17514112
What a mediocre existence you have.
Do your family a favor and an hero yourself.

>> No.17514141

>>17514135
What an oxymoron

>> No.17514142

>>17514138
>so insecure.

>> No.17514144

>>17514138
We're talking to someone who's so brainwashed he saves love letters from his master? Do Americans really?

>> No.17514148

>>17514138
Still got a fucking boss, though. Jump through those hoops, dog. Laughing My Fucking Ass Off.

>> No.17514150

>>17514142
I'm not the one putting others down out of jealousy and seethe
>>17514144
>having a great relationship with the founding partner of your law firm means you're brainwashed
this is exactly what I mean. you think you're cool because you can act dismissive online, but the fact is you'd eat a bowl of microwaved smegma so you could earn $50k a year and larp as Teddy lite to online strangers

>> No.17514151

What should I get for the birth of my first son (second child)?

>already have a Milgauss (I’m an engineer so it’s not cringe)
>Rolex AD likes me, can probably get me a Batman or an Explorer 1
>don’t really have a decent dress watch, but also don’t live near any PP/ALS/VC boutiques. Not near a major metro that has a retail Calatrava/Saxonia/Traditionelle available
>budget: ~$30k

>> No.17514152

>>17514136
>I'll admit to stoking poor vs. rich conflict in this thread for my own amusement,
lol, I thought I was the only one.

>> No.17514153

>>17514150
Wow, for someone who's so "secure" you're certainly bitchy as fuck. Hormone therapy not working for you?

>> No.17514154

>>17514148
you and the other "winners" in this thread are truly the modern uprising of the proletariat, let me tell ya
I'll have my own law firm one day. you'll still be a fucking fool on 4chan putting others down to keep yourself one more day away from the rope

>> No.17514155

>>17514138
So, you gave your boss a sloppy blowjob.
And?

>>17514139
I know, right? He's been having a mental breakdown for YEARS now. PLURAL.
lmao

>> No.17514156

>>17514151
You should spend that 30k on a sick nursery

>> No.17514160

>>17514151
That's really sad that you're using the birth of your first son as an excuse to buy a watch, put that money in a college fund, christ.

>> No.17514161

>>17514139
Is the lawyer guy actually legit?

>> No.17514162

>>17514153
>>17514155
>if you reply to someone, you're going haywire
>if you have a fulfilling career, you're a bootlicker
why is it always low SES that behaves this way

>> No.17514163

>>17514150
Wait you ate microwaved smegma to get into the law firm? Is this one of those American fraternity things?

>> No.17514164

>>17514154
>I'll have my own law firm one day.
Oh, my sides.

I'll be chasing ambulances too, I swear.

>> No.17514165

>>17514156

Nursery is already setup and it’s sick. Kid has everything he could ever need ready to go. It’s time to buy a watch. This is /wt/, not nursery thread

>> No.17514166

>>17514164
>all lawyer work is rushing to the emergency room
watch less television and get out in the real world
>>17514163
>n-no u
classic

>> No.17514168

>>17514165
Post nursery pic

>> No.17514169

>>17514161
Mortadello is. I mean, he's fat and friendless, but his watch collection is GOAT.

This new lawyer is pretty fucking pathetic, though.

>> No.17514172

>>17514160

I am a multimillionaire (8 figures). College is paid for. This is /wt/, not Dave Ramsey. Wtf is wrong with you faggots?

>> No.17514173

>>17514161
>lawyer
>legit
???

>> No.17514174

>>17514161
even if he's lying about being a lawyer he has more net worth in watches than this thread has entire assets combined

>> No.17514176

This new lawyer is the new Frenchtard. What shall we name him?

>> No.17514177

>>17514161
Legit. Lawyeranon's collection is god tier.

>> No.17514178

>>17514165
Hope your wife rolls over him and suffocates him and you have to cover it up and you suck every LEO/gangster/politician cock you can for it but it still gets found out.

>> No.17514180

>>17514178
His obese wife is gonna miscarry. He's still American.

>> No.17514181

>>17514165
>>17514172
There are only a few good users in /wt/. Most of the people here are teenagers or adult failures who will never own any of the watches they criticize or drool over.
You're unironically better off going to r/watches.
That said, for $30k I highly recommend stretching the budget a bit to get the Credor Eichi II in rose gold. It is one of the pinnacles of watchmaking.

>> No.17514184

>>17514177
Tell me one good watch he has that he didn't buy by accident. Guy is fucking brain damaged, he buys random shit like depressed women in a candy store.

>> No.17514190

>>17514181
>cretin ecchi lol

>> No.17514193

>>17514172
Lange 1 you fool
Now post it when it arrives

>> No.17514194

>>17514176
This is what I stay in this thread for: some retard thinks he can impress us with a used Rolex then gets mad as fuck when no one cares.

>> No.17514196

>>17514190
>>17514194
post your watch collections with a timestamp

>> No.17514201
File: 279 KB, 800x1100, All-Man+Mans+Watch_s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514201

Now I remember why I never come to these threads and they're dead. Damn

>> No.17514202

>>17514196
You first, you overcompensating faggot, haha

>> No.17514203

>>17514174
What do you estimate the worth of his collection to be?

>> No.17514204

>>17514203
The new lawyer? Maybe 10k USD. Fat Mortadello? About 50k USD.

>> No.17514205

>GUISE IM A HECKIN EXPLORER I EXPLOR THE GHETTOS OF PARIS SACRE BLEAU

>> No.17514206

>>17514203
old lawyer collection was at least 500,000 of random shit like limited GP

>> No.17514207

>>17514174
There's this one guy on EDC with a Cornes de Vache

>> No.17514209

>>17514184
>Lange, Journe, Breguet, etc... bought by ACCIDENT.
>He went to the pharmacy and ended up buying a +30k watch.
>crazy accidet
LOL What a weird deranged cope.
That's why you'll always be a poortard.

>> No.17514210

>>17514202
I already did above: GS/Rolex/Tag. What's yours? I promise I won't be mean (because I'm not a miserable bottom-feeder), I just want to see it.
>>17514204
Mine is only worth about $15k including the Citizen, Movado, etc. I really only wear the GS, though, and may get a Milgauss.

>> No.17514211

>>17514206
Wow seriously? That's half of what my house is worth

>> No.17514212

>>17514201
Half of it is kids wanting a $6000 watch because brand name, a couple guys who clearly have spent as much money on watches as a house (who knows what the rest of their life is like), a few regular guys who buy $100-500 watches, and a bunch of shitposters.

>> No.17514213
File: 363 KB, 695x846, 20230301_184425.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514213

>> No.17514216

>>17514209
Just tell me the watch retard.

>> No.17514217

>>17514212
There's also like two or three posters who spent a fuckton on watches only to realize no one gives a shit and they're still middle-aged and fat.

>> No.17514219

>>17514210
You're just flailing now. You should probably give it a week and posters will forget how you've humiliated yourself.

>> No.17514222

>>17514219
I will never forget. I still have that retarded roof coverer's info and I'm waiting to send everything to everyone when he least expects it.

>> No.17514223

>>17514203
Given the fact that his collection was around half a million like five years ago, and he has been posting a several new pieces, AND the fucking quarantine watch inflation, I'd think about $750,000

>> No.17514224

>>17514219
You wishing that I feel humiliated doesn't make it a reality. I have an objectively fine set of watches. I'm very, very happy with my GS and that's really all that matters.
Why don't you post your collection?

>> No.17514227
File: 738 KB, 1495x1819, Inside_The_Zaratsu_Polishing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514227

>>17514213
At least post the real one.

>> No.17514228

>>17514224
>I'm not humiliated, you are. That's why I'm responding to every single post.

>> No.17514230

>>17514224
>Why don't you post your collection?
At this point, you'll shit on it no matter what, since you're trying to save face. I'm enjoying my VC as much as I'm enjoying watching you shit your pants.

>> No.17514232

>>17514223
He should sell it all and buy a nice house

>> No.17514233
File: 23 KB, 226x218, zeldacdi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514233

>>17514230
>VC

>> No.17514234

If you RENT your apartment and you own a Rolex or an expensive Omega or anything above, you're stupid!

>> No.17514235

>>17514230
As I said before, I have no reason to shit on it. VC is an excellent watchmaker and I'd be as silly as you if I were to disparage it. Since you now know I clearly respect VC, you should post it with a timestamp. You wouldn't continue to LARP so pathetically, would you?
>>17514228
>If you reply to someone who's talking to you, you're seething.
Please go outside, anon -- for your parents' sake.

>> No.17514236

>>17514232
For what, though? He's got no family. He could live in an Altoids tin. Once he dies all his shit's going to the state anyway.

>> No.17514238

>>17514227
I did

>> No.17514239

>>17514235
Nah, the only silly person here is you, who tried to defend yourself on 4chan. Dumbass.

>> No.17514242

>>17514236
It's arguably more useful than a collection of watches where he can only wear about 6 at once

>> No.17514245

>>17514235
>Somebody please post their collection to take the heat off me.
No, this is fun. Keep lashing out, bitch.

>> No.17514252

>>17514239
>>17514245
>ducking this hard
You guys are honestly pretty pathetic. But I assume tonight will teach you nothing, and despite having nothing going on in your own lives, you'll continue to try demeaning others out of insecurity.
Oh, well. People like you let people like me climb the ladder so I appreciate it, I suppose.

>> No.17514253

there are broke ass niggas here with a credit score below 750
hahahahah

>> No.17514254

>>17514213
>One jewel
>It's not the roller jewel
huh

>> No.17514259

>>17513826
Looks better than a Daytona in some ways

>> No.17514260

>>17514252
>Refresh, refresh, refresh, Oh a (you), post

>> No.17514263
File: 20 KB, 653x342, 3w.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514263

>>17514253
feels good meng

>> No.17514264

This new lawyer-nigger can't wait for a new thread so his embarrassment can be forgotten.

>> No.17514265
File: 238 KB, 800x450, monkey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514265

Let's keep this up for the next thread guys

>> No.17514266

>>17514263
experian score?

>> No.17514268

>>17514266
Idk, I just use CreditKarma.
>>17514264
I don't know why a mentally well-adjusted human being would think that I'd be embarrassed about liking my Grand Seiko. Are you still in middle school or something to think anonymous peer pressure would make me second-guess my taste?

>> No.17514269

>>17514232
He once posted a pic of his dog and his place looked like it has at least three levels and a huge garden. Where does he live? Most american cities that's a half a mill house, I think.

>> No.17514273
File: 351 KB, 1011x1354, 1643610413050.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514273

>>17514265
Yes, let's

>> No.17514275

>>17514269
No idea, it could be a 200k rural house or a multimillion Cali house

>> No.17514276

>>17514263
Bro, good credit just means you're a good goy that pays back loans regularly including interest. The goal in life is not to have an 850 credit score, its paying cash and not using credit so your score goes to 0.

>> No.17514278

>>17514276
>The goal in life is... not using credit so your score goes to 0.
I grow more convinced by the post that /wt/ attracts the opposite of the targeted demographic for watch enthusiasts.

>> No.17514279
File: 1.23 MB, 1920x1416, 1672812451455.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514279

>>17514268
>I don't know why a mentally well-adjusted human being would think that I'd be embarrassed about liking my Grand Seiko. Are you still in middle school or something to think anonymous peer pressure would make me second-guess my taste?
I can actually picture you crying right now.

>> No.17514284

>>17514279
Why do you refuse to post your timestamped collection? You seem very proud of your nonexistent VC. You're not so tied to your LARP that your mind would shatter if it were to be dispelled, are you?

>> No.17514286

>>17514278
Thats true, a lot of /wt/ posters just find the most abhorrent shit and then play it off as if they're the enthusiast with taste when 15 people say its fucking ugly. Then those same people will point out its $2000 so it must be better than a $150 "shitter".

>> No.17514295

>>17514284
You're literally sobbing right now.

>> No.17514297

>>17514286
Imagine the lack of life experience you have to have to say the mark of success is not having a credit history.
Then understand this person posts opinions about luxury timepieces.
>>17514295
Why don't you just post your timestamped collection? I pinky promise I'll say something nice about it.

>> No.17514299

This has been one truly special thread, from the arguing about the Reverso and Santos, the meta commentary in between, to the class war.

>> No.17514300

>>17514284
This thread can't end fast enough for you, can it, little bitch?

>> No.17514303

>>17514297
I have an 800 something credit score. If your life goal is to take out loans, get charged interest, and then pay it back slowly, then take out another loan, then slowly pay it back, then fine, aspire to whatever goodgoy number you want. My goal is to have money and not care what my credit score is or what the interest rate is.

>> No.17514304

>>17514299
The class war only goes one way. I'm the anon that owns the GS. People who don't own a "luxury" watch are seething for no reason while pretending that they do. It's absurd.
>>17514300
I'll ask the same question in the next thread. You did score a solid win, though - all this posting made me email my first draft of a medical records summary for a medical malpractice case well beyond the time I wanted to. You made me work until 8pm, anon! A win for the proletariat!

>> No.17514305

>>17514284
>Why do you refuse to post your timestamped collection?
Because it's funnier to watch you beg me.

>> No.17514306

>>17514002
CWC

>> No.17514310

>>17514304
>I'll ask the same question in the next thread. You did score a solid win, though - all this posting made me email my first draft of a medical records summary for a medical malpractice case well beyond the time I wanted to. You made me work until 8pm, anon! A win for the proletariat!
LOL, you really are an ambulance chaser!

>> No.17514312

>>17514138
Okay this is pretty cringe ngl

>> No.17514314

>>17514305
But image the EPIC OWN when you post your VC to BTFO my Nippon shitter and everybody claps!!! I'll beg for your forgiveness.
>>17514303
You definitely don't have a credit score if you think good credit necessitates taking out loans and paying them back slowly.
>>17514310
We can't all be heroic anti-system freeloaders.
Did your mom make the dino nuggets crispy tonight?
>>17514312
Tell me what's cringe about it.

>> No.17514315

>>17514312
Y-you don't save texts from your boss?

>> No.17514316

>>17514314
Oh shit, he's multi-responding now.

>> No.17514322

New thread
>>17514321
>>17514321
>>17514321

>> No.17514401
File: 43 KB, 780x516, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514401

>>17514303
Absolutely based and 200IQpilled

>> No.17514457

>>17514075
He never bragged about it, retard

>> No.17514572
File: 350 KB, 2927x1488, 1677898902072.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17514572

>>17513349
BASED

>> No.17514771

>>17514572
Is that Oceanus on the right missing a crystal? If not that is some good AR coating.

>> No.17514885

>>17514172
So why do you need an excuse to buy a watch? Just buy it rather than using your son as a prop in your watch collecting.

>> No.17514963

>>17514151
>What should I get for the birth of my first son
You should get nothing. He should get everything.

>> No.17514964

>>17514139
At least that brazilanon has stopped bugging everyone to buy him a Rolex

>> No.17515319

>>17513685
lurking a dead thread i ran across this, so before it's pruned: pretty nice actually
that perlon weave is really interesting and robust looking

>> No.17515515

>>17514771
Anuses have some of the best AR in the industry