Low rise jeans

[Anonymous No.17371166]

How the fuck did generation X think this looked good?

[Anonymous No.17371168]

>>17371166
they wanted women to starve themselves to look like boys bck then

[Anonymous No.17371212]

>>17371166
It makes my dick erect so it automatically looks good

[Anonymous No.17371260]

>>17371168
Yeah. You brain dead millenials are what caused the current culture war

[Anonymous No.17371264]

It did look good. People were skinnier back then.

[Anonymous No.17371271]

>>17371166
Jokes on you its already back in fashion.

[Anonymous No.17371310]

>>17371166
Seething fatties will never look good.

[Anonymous No.17371341]

>>17371166
Looks terrible. I was in middle school back then and went crazy every time I saw a thong, but it objectively looks like shit. Asses look so flat in low rise jeans.

[Anonymous No.17371347]

>>17371166
Every normie wore:
>Aeropostale
>Abercrombie
>Hollister
>American Eagle
>American Apparel

[Anonymous No.17371400]

>>17371166
Front looks good desu

[Anonymous No.17371404]

>>17371166
Sex appeal, that's it. Especially men should stay far away from low rise anything.

[Anonymous No.17371419]

>>17371166
Looks great on skinny girls

[Anonymous No.17371587]

>>17371264
>>17371310
>>17371404
>sex appeal
Where? If you find those sticks attractive you are either
1 a pedo
or
2 extremely low test

[Anonymous No.17371592]

>>17371587
Only 3rd world men like curvy women pajeet

[Anonymous No.17371723]

>>17371592
Bullshit. Euros loved curvy women too. Obsession with being stick thin was only a few decades.

[Anonymous No.17371740]

>>17371723
>Euros
Nah. You're a retard

[Anonymous No.17371786]

>>17371723
>waist 21 inches
>fAt
ur a moron kys

[Anonymous No.17371876]

>>17371587
Lose some weight, that's literally all it takes.

[Anonymous No.17371895]

>>17371347
donut forget jack wills. anf was so soft. we will never get quality like that ever agen

[Anonymous No.17372105]

>>17371723
>>17371587
kek

[Anonymous No.17372109]

>>17372105
i'm taking over this thread to remind fatties that obesity will never be attractive

[Anonymous No.17372113]

[Anonymous No.17372114]

>>17372109
>taking over this thread
abt damn time bitch

[Anonymous No.17372117]

[Anonymous No.17372121]

ywnhawlet
>YOU
>WILL
>NEVER
>HAVE
>A
>WIFE
>LIKE
>ELIZABETH
>TAYLOR

[Anonymous No.17372122]

>>17372109
>Real women have anterior pelvic tilt, wear a corset or are heavily edited in photoshop
Ftfy

[Anonymous No.17372123]

the most effay thing you can wear is a good figure anons. never forget.

[Anonymous No.17372164]

>>17372122
kek, if that's what you need to tell yourself. fit women exist anon.

[Anonymous No.17372169]

its better than what we have now, at least low rise jeans encouraged skinniness and you could see girls buttcracks

[Anonymous No.17372263]

>>17371587
>not finding sticcs and slampigs attractive
Found the low-t bitch boy

[Anonymous No.17372752]

>>17371166
GenXers had great taste. It's millennials that fucked things up in the 2010s.

[Anonymous No.17372838]

>>17372752
this is how millennials dressed as teens

[Anonymous No.17372844]

>>17371166
White trash still dresses exactly like this.

[Anonymous No.17372858]

>>17372838
Yeah and somehow in the 2010s, they decided they thought it was ugly while it never was and then switched. It wasn't gen x or zoomers who changed it.

[Anonymous No.17372952]

>>17372122
Literally all you have to do is lose weight.
Just stop being fat and you can be attractive.

[Anonymous No.17373054]

Has any of you considered that low rise jeans were uncomfortable as fuck and maybe not every girl wanted to walk around with her asscrack showing?
Not to mention how impractical they were in the winter because sweaters were never long enough to cover all the exposed skin

[Anonymous No.17373072]

>>17373054
that's hot

[Anonymous No.17373089]

>>17372169
Buttcracks are NOT hot

[Anonymous No.17373232]

>>17373089
They are if the girls are hot.

[Anonymous No.17373478]

>>17371260
>Blaming us for your absent minded parents who don't love you
Kek>>17371264

[Anonymous No.17373481]

>>17372121
Mine is pretty close senpai.

[Anonymous No.17373491]

>>17371166
this is late millennial shit not gen x, high rise mom jeans were all the rage late eighties early nineties when gen x were young adults.

[Anonymous No.17373513]

>>17371587
retarded take

[Anonymous No.17374131]

>>17373491
Late millenials wore this when they were like 5 y/o. That was xennials and core millennials territoriy.

[Anonymous No.17374225]

>>17371166
Zoomie girls are the hottest

[Anonymous No.17374241]

>>17374131
Wrong word, sorry. i meant older not late, i do remember these and i'm 33, it wasn't a very good look. I much prefer high rise what show ass curves off.

[Anonymous No.17374257]

>>17374241
I'm the same age but I only started liking girls in jeans when mid-rise became the norm, then low-rise became my favorite. Never liked the 90210 Beverly Hills high-rise look.

[Anonymous No.17374291]

>>17372122
>doesn't believe in thin women
I know everything about you based on this statement

[Anonymous No.17374294]

>>17374225
This

[Anonymous No.17374302]

>>17374225
I like ass, but these weird jean/spandex things just look so off-putting and strange (plus jeans are a male garment so if you find them hot on a woman -you're actually gay). Additionally, in order to get these big asses, these women end up over working their leg muscles and they take on this sickening cattle like over definition particularly in the thigh area. Disagree if you want, but you're intrinsically wrong.

[Anonymous No.17374333]

>>17372117
>ugly face
>see no use in self improving
They're right.

[Anonymous No.17374637]

>>17371166
low rise jeans are the hottest shit I'm glad they're coming back

[Anonymous No.17375001]

>>17371166
i can almost see her pussy?

[Anonymous No.17375130]

>>17374302
I'm just saying that zoomies are hotter than gen x. Gen x girls already hit the wall.

[Anonymous No.17375186]

>>17375130
Gen X girls have become milfs. It's millennial roasties who are currently irredeemable.

[Anonymous No.17375202]

>>17375130
there is no wall
if you don't believe me, make an on-line dating profile with photos of one of the "post-wall" women.

[Anonymous No.17375211]

>>17375186
Agree, as a millennial myself, women my age are insufferable.

>>17375202
Bro, i did. In dating apps literally age 25 is the magical "wall" where you can see that the cock carousel took it's toll. With 30 most girls look like grannies.

[Anonymous No.17375219]

>>17375211
>With 30 most girls look like grannies.
Doesn't matter what they look like but what they can get.
A woman who's 40 today has more and better men competing for her than the same woman had when she was 20. It's because dating apps have increased her reach a thousandfold. So because she's 40 she can't get thousands of attractive men willing to commit to her but she can get dozens, which is good enough.

[Anonymous No.17375225]

>>17371587
When you’re used to food not being a problem the mindset changes. There’s a reason it’s always poorer places where weight is considered attractive

[Anonymous No.17375231]

>>17375219
Bro, what the hell. Most men on dating apps want sex. The average beta fag of course date a 40 dear old women, that dude usually is in your typical 9 to 5 job waging his ass off, probably looking sports at sky TV at his free time or worse still plays world of warcraft. Quality dudes with money, right mindset, ressources literally date young(19-21 year old). Why should i bother with a used up emotional car with high mileage? Makes no sense at all.

[Anonymous No.17375236]

>>17375219
Bro, what the hell. Most men on dating apps want sex. The average beta fag of course date a 40 year old women, that dude usually is in your typical 9 to 5 job waging his ass off, probably looking sports at sky TV at his free time or worse still plays world of warcraft. Quality dudes with money, right mindset, ressources literally date young(19-21 year old). Why should i bother with a used up emotional car with high mileage? Makes no sense at all.

[Anonymous No.17375241]

>>17375225
Food is not a problem anywhere in the developed world. It's just that with experience you learn that girls who look skinny in clothes look a bit... skeletal when naked.For skinny girls clothes increase their apparent attractiveness not unlike makeup. You get a completely different impression when you get her naked. Not saying they're unattractive, but when I check them out, I always keep in mind that skinny in clothes = bony naked.

[Anonymous No.17375253]

>>17375236
I dunno, but as I said make an on line dating profile as one of those women and see what you (she) can get. It's pretty crazy how many attractive but thirsty guys there are out there.

If you look at the most attractive and successful men, they're usually not with women in their early 20s even though every one of those guys could get yachtloads of young women. I'm not sure why but there's probably a good reason.

[Anonymous No.17375266]

>>17375253
100% sure that also 40 year old women get male attention, but mostly sex.
Quality attention literally is for girls in they prime.
But yeah, i notice how "elite" faggots like Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Bill Gates simp for the wrinkled fruits. But this dudes get divorced the hell out for being beta nigs. Look at Trumps dating life. Always dating young models(19-21 year old) and dump them when they getting annoying and old.

[Anonymous No.17375315]

>>17375266
Melania Trump is 50 and she was 35 when Trump married her. Why didn't he marry an 18 year old virgin or something?

[Anonymous No.17375345]

>>17375315
Yeah, but 28 when Trump was dating her, that time he divorced from his old wife.
We all know what Trump did with Epstein.

[Anonymous No.17375350]

>>17375345
>Epstein

I don't get that idiot and the other idiots who risked so much. Don't they know where Europe is?

[Anonymous No.17375352]

>>17371260
I was born in 95 and remember seeing a distinct difference between the millenials and upcoming genz. I'm convinced it was roastie elementary/middle/high school teachers seething about girls like >>17371166 that indoctrinated genz to fight a culture war as a means of coping.

[Anonymous No.17375461]

>>17375352
>born in 95
Do you relate to zoomers or millenials?
>I'm convinced it was roastie elementary/middle/high school teachers seething about girls like >>17371166 (OP) that indoctrinated genz to fight a culture war as a means of coping.
It was. I remember in 2008, women would get shamed for wearing leggings. Now it is a wardrobe staple.

[Anonymous No.17375502]

>>17375461
more to millenials probably. I went on a few dates with a gen z girl and she couldn't fathom that I had never seen stranger things or listened to billy eyelash before

[Anonymous No.17375738]

>>17371166
Checked. It did look good. I like low rise jeans too bad I can't find any for men. I wear my pants on my hips and all my pants fit a bit baggy :(

[Anonymous No.17375782]

>>17371166
low rise jeans are a billion times better than the fucking disgusting high rise/mom jeans trend of the 2010s

[Anonymous No.17375787]

>>17372113
laughing my fucking ass off at this, why did it need to be labeled

[Anonymous No.17375813]

>>17375502
Somehow younger girls(19-21 years) are more open and interested to listen to your stuff. Literally talk about shit you do in freetime. Talking about my daily work routine, seeing costumers oversees etc. makes her eyes shiny. Makes sense, she's still in university or shit like that. Overall they are really easy going, it's easy for an older dude to fill in the daddy role.
Older women literally test you, don't believing you at first, or are argumentative, because her ex dude number 465# did better. The juice isn't worth the squeeze with high mileage cars(just for the easy ride=sex, but nothing more).

[Anonymous No.17375917]

>>17371166
>pierced tongue
>exposted thongs
>don't look good
massive tastelet detected

[Anonymous No.17376037]

>>17373481
Post wife

[Anonymous No.17377144]

>>17375502
I'm a millennial but I don't relate to gen z at all... nor to millennials. If anything, I relate more to gen xers or xennials.

[Anonymous No.17377186]

>>17377144
that's very chuuni of you

[Anonymous No.17377190]

>>17377144

same, '91 millenial here, always thought gen X was cool as fuck

[Anonymous No.17377198]

>>17377186
>>17377190
Thanks. Fashion peaked in the early 2000s thanks to low-rise jeans. Based gen xers for bringing it back during that era (iirc it was also a thing in the 70s plus low-slung skirts were a thing in foreign countries), but thanks also to their zoomer daughters for bringing it back this time.

[Anonymous No.17377347]

>>17377144
>>17377190
Tha's because you live mentally in the past.

[Anonymous No.17377399]

>>17377347
Xennial fashion is coming back and soon will low-rise, so I'm good.

[Anonymous No.17377406]

>>17377399
As long as the next gen of "zoomie" girls(19-21 year old girls) wear it i'm fine

[Anonymous No.17377418]

>>17371166
It does, Low Rise > High Rise

[Anonymous No.17377421]

>>17371168
Coping fattie spotted

[Anonymous No.17377437]

>>17377198
Gen x'ers didn't wear this shit, early millennials did, the oldest millennials are now 40 years old.

[Anonymous No.17377439]

>>17377418
most girls who wore low rise didn't look like this, fatties existed in a large number even 20 years ago it wasn't that long ago, it didn't look good, blubber hanging over jeans looks bad. You guys are cherry picking and having nostaligia for a time when you probably not even alive.

[Anonymous No.17377462]

>>17377439
So what? Girls in movies and videogames looked good in low rise, thats what matters

[Anonymous No.17377464]

>>17377437
Late genxers and xennials absolutely did.

[Anonymous No.17377466]

>>17377439
To be honest though, that's not entirely their fault when the industry only makes low-rise up to size 10 and there are no standard sizing. Fat girls can't even buy trendy jeans their size when it's not available in fast fashion shops.

[Anonymous No.17377471]

>>17377462
They don't represent the majority, i was there, it wasn't a good look.
>>17377462
Most gen-x are now in there late forties and early to mid 50's, most people who wore these were early millenials like i said(81 to 83) of course you will have had a small amount of people older who wore them but most were young adults.

I was about 17 when these were popular, i didn't think it looked particularly good or flattering, most people don't look like celebrities or models.

[Anonymous No.17377476]

>>17377466
There is a reason trousers with a natural rise which goes up to the navel were the norm for decades, it simply looks more flattering on a larger amount of body types and is more comfortable. Low rise makes the chest look longer and the legs shorter, which is not a good thing. Anyone who is a least bit into tailoring and fashion knows this, there is a reason why high rise has existed for centuries and low rise hasn't, high rise compliments the natural curvature of the body more. It wasn't even called high rise in the past, it was just normal.

[Anonymous No.17377490]

>>17377476
>Low rise makes the chest look longer and the legs shorter, which is not a good thing
It's a good thing if you have a short chest and long legs though, low-rise balances them out. By the way, high-rise isn't universally flattering: some look good in them, others look better in low, some look better in mid. It depends heavily on the body type. I thought you knew that. I take into account that tailors already know that shit. Also, like I said, low-rise skirts were a common thing historically in eastern/tropical cultures.

[Anonymous No.17377653]

>>17377439
fatties look bad in high rises as well

[Anonymous No.17377656]

>>17377653
Yeah but atleast the flab isn't as visible, i still have nightmares seeing fat girls in thongs and low rise jeans

[Anonymous No.17377877]

>>17372113
holy shit i made this a year ago

[Anonymous No.17377892]

>>17372123
goes hard

[Anonymous No.17377908]

>>17377439
it wasn't like that where i live. it was just a few fatties and they didn't even wear jeans. nowadays it's a lot more polarized, seems like high schoolers and college students are either fitness freaks or have let themselves go, there are hardly any skinny people around bar some nerdy guys. just yesterday i walked into a bunch of high school girls at the grocery store, each of them at like 30 BMI, and thought they seemed the type that used to be skinny back in the 00s

[Anonymous No.17377951]

>>17377908
I see plenty of skinny zoomettes at colleges, subways and downtown.

[Anonymous No.17378024]

hijacking this thread because you cunts don't matter

where can i get jeans to fit my big dong and balls without looking like a forklift operator? all jeans now are made for zoomer dicklets, if i get hard it looks obscene

[Anonymous No.17378026]

>>17377908
Glad that shit is over and zoomie girls are hot nowadays

[Anonymous No.17378057]

>>17377471
It doesnt matter, I only care about movies and videogames

[Anonymous No.17378064]

>>17371166
Gen X? We had this.

[Anonymous No.17378078]

>>17378024
Baggy or carpenter jeans? Literally Target or Wal-Mart.

[Anonymous No.17378079]

>>17378026
They're even hotter than millennial girls their age did ages ago.

[Anonymous No.17378675]

[Anonymous No.17378702]

>>17378675
I want to fuck Renee Bellerive.

[Anonymous No.17379181]

>>17378079
This

[Anonymous No.17379495]

>>17379181
Imagine her in low-rise jeans...

[Anonymous No.17379510]

>>17379495
imagine the smell