[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 458 KB, 1800x1800, W-1858RolexGMT-MasterLongEFirstOwnerFullProvenance_16_1x1_1b630c1c-4f7f-4b4a-9620-dc85149d32f8_1800x1800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254294 No.17254294 [Reply] [Original]

Yep, it's another Rolex in the OP edition.

> Poorfag guide: https://imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

OLD >>17251778

>> No.17254298
File: 502 KB, 1827x1973, heres your $6500 rolex bro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254298

>>17254294
SWISS SHITTER

I PAID $6500 FOR THIS SWISS WATCH BECAUSE A WORKER IN SHITTERLAND FARTED ON IT WHILE PUTTING IN THE SCREWS

>> No.17254299
File: 337 KB, 1080x1644, Screenshot_20220919_000654.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254299

FIRST FOR SWISS SHITTER

>> No.17254300
File: 546 KB, 1488x1140, oh no.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254300

(((SWISS DESIGN)))

WORTH EVERY PENNY

>> No.17254301
File: 995 KB, 1956x1300, 8w3v18z8ue661.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254301

LUME

too expensive for the swiss!

where we are going, pilots dont need lume in their dark cockpits!!!

>> No.17254302

>>17254299
you'll need a new spring if the spring went flying, but the bezel should just snap back into place.

>> No.17254303
File: 476 KB, 825x1100, img099012.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254303

look at my rolex

dripping with sophistication!

man of TASTE

>> No.17254304
File: 398 KB, 220x222, cat.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254304

>>17254300
>Rolex having its own design language is bad for some reasons

>> No.17254308
File: 42 KB, 1080x778, FB_IMG_1663535389682.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254308

>When he can't understand the difference between two brands owned by the same people, and a third shitty brand stealing the design that belongs to the first two.

>> No.17254311

>>17254304
>a design language is having watches look almost the same
gshock models look quite different from each other but they all share a similar overall design language

TOO HARD FOR ROLEX TO DO

>> No.17254312
File: 30 KB, 329x362, 1654549852631_1_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254312

>>17254300

>> No.17254313

>>17254308
>FB_IMG
go back

>> No.17254316
File: 691 KB, 838x1482, 4644548816368.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254316

>Cope if you must

Also, chinese knock-offs need not to apply. Your "watches" are already a steaming pile of shit below any proper category.

>> No.17254323

Is it pathetic to wear a $3k watch at 40?

>> No.17254325
File: 663 KB, 836x983, 1659142485223610.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254325

>I'm so poor I can't pay any (((SWISS))) watch so I spend my time in the internet shilling chinese knock-offs although my arguments are dead stupid.
Pic related, me.

>> No.17254327
File: 1.79 MB, 3772x1864, fiftyfathomsWS1-0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254327

>>17254316
>bruhhh, let me copy your homework, bro
>sure, change it so the teacher wouldn't know

>> No.17254328

>>17254323
Not if you don't care about watches.

>> No.17254331
File: 202 KB, 750x757, lmao.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254331

>>17254325
post your watches with timestamp
show us your swiss watches

>> No.17254332

>>17254327
Literally very different designs.

>> No.17254334

>>17254332
>the same indices
>a big arrow at 12
>an outer moving bezel in the 1950s when it wasnt the norm at all

>very different
surrrrrrrrrre dude

cope and paste, change a few small details
WOW, A BRAND NEW WATCH

>> No.17254336
File: 1.55 MB, 1642x1657, 1663573461309_1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254336

>>17254331
Your image is inverted. No worries, I can fix it for you, pal.

>> No.17254343

>>17254334
Different hands
Different dial sizes
Different fonts
Different numbers on the bezels
Different shape of the cases
Different lenght of the dial's elements
Different lugs
Different minute markers
Different orientation of the numbers
Shuuuuuuuure, the "same"

Different thread, same stupidity, eh retard?

>> No.17254344

>>17254336
that GS is a objectively few magnitudes better than that rolex.

>> No.17254345

>>17254343
>doesn't know what "details" mean
holy kek

>copy entire essay
>change a few words here and there

WOW, BRAVE AND ORIGINAL. BRAVO

>> No.17254348
File: 320 KB, 371x470, 1662997005277842.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254348

>>17254345
Doesn't know what different means.

>> No.17254351

>>17254344
Not the same anon but
>sprooong drive
is not better, just the worst of both worlds.

>> No.17254354

>>17254348
>doesnt know what copying means
pretty much everyone admits that the rolex sub is a homage of the fathoms

>> No.17254361
File: 105 KB, 1035x507, Screenshot_20220919-030205.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254361

>>17254354
Not the same, retard.
Rolex DIDN'T COPY Blancpain.
Pagani Shitsign IS COPYING Tudor.

>> No.17254362

>>17254351
it doesnt really matter what you or I personally feel about spring drive
>is it complicated?
yes
>is it also beautiful and mesmerizing?
yes
its daring and innovative and has driven GS to be literally the fastest growing luxury watch brand today

>> No.17254363

>>17254361
>I wrote something in wordpad and screenshotted it and now its the "truth"
a homage is a homage

are you working for free for tudor?
are you cleaning the toilets at tudor HQ?
are the wiping the asses of tudor employees?

why do you even care this much that someone wants to buy a cheap watch that looks like a tudor?

>> No.17254365
File: 1.03 MB, 1480x1838, 1657572231258.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254365

I'm bored with your stupidity and your Pagani Shitsign shilling.

>> No.17254367
File: 67 KB, 593x800, 1965_Submariner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254367

>>17254311
I guess you've been into watches for less than a year, so I'll make it short for you.
Rolex pretty much invented modern sports/tool watches in a matter of 3 years in the 50s.
>1952 : Explorer
>1953 : Submariner
>1954 : GMT Master
The design language, the proportions, the overall design... Everything you know (design-wise) about tool watches basically come from these 3. Not only that, but Rolex also benefited from their own previous innovations : waterproof case and self winding movement in particular.
There's a reason why Rolex is Rolex. They revolutionized watch making in just a few years and were smart enough to market their products in a sexy way.

It always amuses me when newfags try to shit on Rolex. Like, what's even the point? 99% of the specs of their shitters were thought out by Rolex engineers decades ago.

>> No.17254368

>>17254365
>i lost the argument and I want to quit without losing face

fixed it for you, sweetie

>> No.17254369

>>17254367
>1952 : Explorer
>1953 : Submariner
>1954 : GMT Master
interesting how their design got progressively worse with each release

>> No.17254371

>>17254328
>Not if you don't care about watches.
So yes if you do?

>> No.17254373
File: 792 KB, 638x887, rolex buyer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254373

>>17254367
oh look, heres a person working for rolex (((for free)))
can't imagine having the PRVILEGE of waiting 1+ years on the rolex waitlist just so I can buy a $10000 """"tool watch"""" while also not treating it like one and being too scared to scratch it so I have to take it to a shop each time I want to change the straps or even open up the case

all while fending off nasty """"haters"""" online

my rolex
my LOVE

>> No.17254375
File: 949 KB, 1080x1775, Screenshot_20220919-030823_1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254375

>>17254363
>I wrote something in wordpad and screenshotted it and now its the "truth"
My bad. I cut the pics out of the screenshot so you wouldn't get too confused. Here is another screenshot.

Are you cleaning toilets at Pagani Shitsig's slavework shed?

Why do you care that much to keep counterargument -and failing-, I ask you again?

>> No.17254376

>>17254367
>Rolex pretty much invented modern sports/tool watches in a matter of 3 years in the 50s.
Yes, they did.
And then Audermars Piguet made them better and luxurious.
But that's another conversation.

>> No.17254377

>>17254375
>coping this much that you took the time to make a fake article and screenshotted it
LOL

are you refilling the coffee machines at tudor HQ?
are you kissing the shoes of tudor executives?
are you holding the door for tudor couples and paying for their meal?

why do you even care this much that someone wants to buy a cheap watch that looks like a tudor?

>> No.17254379

>>17254367
If you care about history and innovation just buy a seiko and safe yourself some money. Rolex watches are just status symbols, nothing more.

>> No.17254381
File: 38 KB, 473x344, 01T040940.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254381

>>17254377
>Denying obvious proof because you just can't reason intelligently.

I accept your defeat.
Btw, here's the link, you idiotic sad excuse of a human:
https://www.benswatchclub.com/blog/what-are-homage-watches

>> No.17254385
File: 112 KB, 1024x576, 1663019329439890.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254385

>>17254379
>If you care about history and innovation just buy a seiko and safe yourself some money.
>Rolex watches are just status symbols, nothing more.

>> No.17254386
File: 304 KB, 1178x851, a18.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254386

>>17254381
>bens watch club
>a YT creator who literally shills copy pasted homage watches himself
https://www.benswatchclub.com/blog/cadisen-automatic-watch-review

thank you for admitting your loss

>> No.17254388

>>17254381
why are you even linking ben's watch club
thats a blog for poor people
too poor to afford a tudor? oh my

>> No.17254389

>>17254294
Best watch for around 500€?
preferable dark and or silver color

>> No.17254390
File: 727 KB, 500x239, 1660459669300991.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254390

>>17254386
>Anything that doesn't support my failed pov is wrong.
I'll just keep accepting your defeat.

>> No.17254394

>>17254390
>links a source who also advocates buying cheaper when its worth it
you just owned yourself, sweetie.
here he is shilling a pagani himself
https://www.benswatchclub.com/blog/read-this-before-you-buy-a-vincero-watch

>> No.17254398

>>17254389
https://seiko-boutique.de/uhr/ssc773p1
this one looks cool

>> No.17254408

>>17254375
>a pagani is a clone homage
ok, and?

they have never pretended to be original, btw

they literally -dont care- they are a clone homage maker, their only goal is to offer a near copy of snooty luxury watches but at less than 5% of the prices

whats your point, exactly? a person buying pagani isn't going to care about your handwringing

are you seething that he's not caring?
Am I supposed to seethe like you when someone buys a SKMEI (which is just a gshock clone?)

>> No.17254409
File: 1.10 MB, 3184x3081, CFAF07EA-29C8-42AE-B2F0-BB0BBEEC007E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254409

I don’t think the Captain Willard is overpriced.

>> No.17254412

>>17254409
How much is it?

>> No.17254419

>>17254412
1k€

>> No.17254421

>>17254419
lmfao

>> No.17254428
File: 1.24 MB, 1280x720, Youtube-thumbail-rado.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254428

>>17254421
>only the swiss can overcharge for watches
time to buy a $5000 rado that doesn't even have inhouse movement

>> No.17254430

>>17254428
>le bad thing is being done by le bad people so le other bad people can do their le bad thing

>> No.17254433

>>17254430
i think seiko has the cache to be asking for $1000 when many other brands of similar heritage are charging way, way more for their watches

>they can't do it before they used to be cheaper
times change
>they can't do it because they are not swiss
nope
>they can't do it because.... because its a seiko!!
and a rolex only cost the equivalent of $2000 in today's money back in 1970

>> No.17254437

SSC909P1 looks epic

>> No.17254440

>>17254433
What's the point of giving free money to corporations?

>> No.17254463

>>17254409
good lord what an ugly crown guard

>> No.17254480

>>17254367
Rolex is not gonna fuck you, no matter how much you defend it online, bro

>> No.17254520
File: 60 KB, 848x576, The Loomer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254520

>>17254301
OOOOOOOOHHHHH FUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKK

>> No.17254525

>>17254520
no one is actually like this… right?

>> No.17254529
File: 116 KB, 1000x1000, 1659440540574.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254529

>> No.17254535

>>17254299
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqM

>> No.17254547

>>17254525
I feel the trend died down with the Seiko modding scene and the death of the SKX, but for many lume was the most important aspect of a watch. Just the fact that every watch video has to show the lume and the word "lumeshot" exists shows how important it is for a vocal minority. It also has to do with fanbases. Seiko fanboys claimed Seiko had the best lume in the industry so it was something they took a lot of pride in. Every brand has their thing whether it's exclusivity, value, features, design, history, etc.., that people claim matters most.

>> No.17254555

sprong

>> No.17254605

>>17254463
It's an ugly watch, period. There are people out there who like it apparently.

>> No.17254615

>>17254303
>>17254308
Get a room already

>> No.17254627

>>17254547
what a stupid fucking thing to care about, seikope fanboys will do anything to justify their poverty.

>> No.17254640
File: 472 KB, 1470x2370, ED115FC9-1935-4532-A764-E0EAB4EB86FC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254640

This will kill watches

>> No.17254655

>>17254433
The thing about Seiko is that they have increased their prices, but the material quality of their watches is the same or less. So obviously, as a consumer, I wonder where the fuck is my money going, and without a clear answer, I just may decide to take my business elsewhere

>> No.17254671

>>17254299
>does anyone know how i can directly contact tudor?
Lol i fucking hate social media

>> No.17254684
File: 1.44 MB, 1136x992, humblecollection.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254684

>> No.17254695
File: 586 KB, 1280x1280, seiko_6665551.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254695

>>17254655
its called inflation

consider pic related. Its $1000.

where else are you going to get something like that for $1000?
Hamilton? thats also like $800 at least. Tissot...? thats obviously worse and who wants a shittot? Orient star? ok now you're going to have to deal with an import because nobody carries orient star.

in the end all roads lead to seiko. Blame the swiss

>> No.17254697

>>17254695
Seiko give me a presidential bracelet please

>> No.17254701

>>17254367
>tool watches
Rolex is definitely a watch for tools.

>> No.17254716

Does the Tudor ranger have any reason to exist?

>> No.17254718

>>17254695
Yes yes very nice
Let's see what kind of crystal covers the dial

>> No.17254722

>>17254718
both the front and back are sapphire

>> No.17254726

>>17254722
So the same thing they used when the presage was at $400 based

>> No.17254730

>>17254726
2017 was 30 years ago

again, which other maker will have stuff at $400 now? even microbrands cost $500 + -

>> No.17254732

>>17254695
I'd much rather get a PRX than one of those sharp edge seikos. Seiko hasn't been good value since they discontinued the classic SARBs. That being said, there's a lot of value in second hand Seiko if you don't go for the popular models. I got a JDM HAQ that looks and feels like a baby Grand Seiko for 200 bucks recently.

>> No.17254734

>>17254716
It's literally the best 3 hands sports watch you can get under 3k

>> No.17254735

>>17254695
THAT PIECE OF SHIT IS $1K???? Holy fuck I thought Seiko were like $200??

>> No.17254741

>>17254735
yeah and the seiko 5 was $60

MOVE ON, GRANDPA

>> No.17254743

>>17254734
black bay 36 kinda mogs it and ad gives 20 percent off usually

>> No.17254746

>>17254743
the black bay is so ugly, why would you use circle indicators with rectangular hands

>> No.17254747

>>17254743
The BB36 uses an ETA movement.
The Ranger has the Kenissi/Tudor movement.

>> No.17254749

>has no money and wants a watch
Swatch
>Has money and wants a watch
Omega.

>> No.17254751

>>17254730
Unironically the chinks

>> No.17254755
File: 321 KB, 2000x1333, Baltic-Aquascaph.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254755

>>17254741
Suck a nigger dick, AIDS faggot.
For 1k you can get a cool Baltic that looks like a 3k watch, and you'd still have 200 left
Anyone spending 1k on a FUCKING SEIKO is RETARDED.

>> No.17254756

>>17254749
Omegas are literally Swatch

>> No.17254758
File: 68 KB, 800x800, 20172165-w5uyyrjkh66ut6d9uyi8zsw6-ExtraLarge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254758

>>17254730
>AIEEEEEE CITIZEN-SAMA IM SORRY

>> No.17254762

>>17254755
not inhouse

also,
>having to spend 30 minutes trying to explain the concept of microbrands to each and every watch boomer

>> No.17254763

I'm starting to appreciate dress watches more and more

>> No.17254766

>>17254762
>not inhouse
Who the fuck cares about in house movement on cheap watches?
>>having to spend 30 minutes trying to explain the concept of microbrands to each and every watch boomer
Why would you care about boomers' opinions in the first place?

You have weird concerns dude.

>> No.17254769

>>17254766
>who cares about inhouse on cheap watches??
>who cares about heritage on cheap watches??
>who cares about finishing on cheap watches??
>who...

just buy a f91w then
no, even the f91w is inhouse.
you can buy an aliexpress watch.

>> No.17254785
File: 473 KB, 1600x1067, tudor-ranger-79950-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254785

>>17254734
>"wow, is that... a Rolex?"
>"no, uhhhh...i-its a tu-tu-tudor..."
>"oh, I think I kinda heard of that brand"
>*blushing immensely* "Really?? WELL. You see, Tudor is part of Rolex, but not quite. Actually they are 2 separate brands, but its the same umbrella, haha. So, I bought Tudor because its just like Rolex, but cheaper, you know? like how Walmart has their own potato chips but its actually just bought wholesale from Lay's so its the same quality made in the same factories so then if you buy the walmart one you get the same quality but lesser the price! ....Neat, huh?"

*crickets*
".....hey?"
>"Yeah I'm...going to go to the ladies room now." *forces a smile*
>"Oh ok..."

>> No.17254788

>>17254367
Boomer watch you could get on discount before crypto explosion made a bunch of basement dwellers overnight millionaires.
It doesn’t matter that you diversified your crypto into “watch investments”, you bought a meme that will fall out of the limelight in 5-15 years. Just like it did in the early 2000s.

>> No.17254797

>>17254785
Literally no one ever. Why are so retarded?

>> No.17254798

>>17254785
i look like this and say this

>> No.17254802
File: 351 KB, 2179x2047, 1663598942180.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254802

>>17254520
IM LOOOOMING

>> No.17254806

>>17254755
no heckin way this only 2800$ piss-stain themed watch has a DOMED SAPPHIRE(25$) crystal! sign me up on the waitlist please, i know they take long to make, i can tell by the piss-patina pixels

>> No.17254808

>>17254806
ESL confirmed. He said it's a 1k watch that looks like a 3k watch. Which it doesn't, it looks like a 1k watch, but most 3k watches don't look like 3k either.

>> No.17254810

>>17254798
you look like a Tudor watch?

>> No.17254811

>>17254808
it was a joke, balcuck

>> No.17254812
File: 528 KB, 2460x2482, 1663599419458.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254812

Love this little guy, I wish Hamilton didn't have so much dogshit in their catalog, I want to like them.

>> No.17254817
File: 116 KB, 1011x700, lesrhabilleurs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254817

>>17254811
I'm not even a balcuck, I'm a wannabe balcuck. Couldn't get the MR-1 so I could pretend I have a Patek

>> No.17254820

>>17254812
I wanted one of these when I was getting into watches but for the life of me I can't remember why. It looks like a $100 Timex at best. I ended up getting a SARB Alpinist instead and selling it for like twice I paid last year.

>> No.17254826

>>17254810
i look like this and say this

>> No.17254828

>>17254817
>MR-1
The other two variants look decent. This light-brown kind of stuff looks wacky (unless youre a nigger in which case, it might look ok?)

>>17254826
Are you a rolex?

>> No.17254833

>>17254820
Its a field watch what the fuck are you expecting?

>> No.17254842

>>17254627
Visibility is important in a dive watch. Sounds like you're trying to feel better about overpaying for shit lume.

>> No.17254849

>>17254842
dive watches are fucking gay and ugly so it makes sense that retards who care about them would obsess over glowing in the dark like a CIA nigger

>> No.17254853
File: 63 KB, 800x450, chad cope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254853

>>17254785
>he doesn't know about the Chad cope

>> No.17254872

>>17254763
I'm kinda over buying any more sports watches also. Dress watches are more versatile than people give them credit for.

>> No.17254896
File: 2.05 MB, 2167x2167, My Parmigiani.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254896

Good morning, my friends.
What are you wearing this fine monday?

>> No.17254899

>>17254896
Does that have a micro roter? How thicc is it?

>> No.17254904
File: 3.12 MB, 504x532, 1663530970072466.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254904

>>17254896
>Hnnnggg
I fucking love the movement inside that watch.

>> No.17254906
File: 45 KB, 1200x900, C-PMD56-2952_b_1400x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254906

>buy a watch I really like every aspect of
>suddenly stop caring about watches, paying attention to sales, checking marketplaces
>come to /wt/ and be immediately bored
Feels good to come out the other side of /wt/ without buying anything ridiculous

>> No.17254911

>>17254899
Indeed it has. It's 7.8 mm thick, if I remember correctly. The microrotor is made of platinum, btw.

>>17254904
I know, right? Gorgeous and very, very well finished.

>> No.17254912

>flight to china is maybe 15 hours
>airmail is taking 9 days and counting
Rep bros... I can't wait for my Chinese Rolex...

>> No.17254930

>>17254912
customs bros, I hope they'll seize it

>> No.17254931
File: 68 KB, 607x607, 165343890158.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254931

>>17254930
THIS

>> No.17254941

>>17254930
>caring this much about a brand you are not working for

>> No.17254946

>>17254640
This will watch kills

>> No.17254951

>>17254896
Very nice, lawyer. Today I'm wearing my green dial Alpinist.

>> No.17254958

Suggest a watch for me.
>Budget
$400
>Watch Type
Just no sports watch, a classic type with no unnecessary watch hands and a dark color would be great.
>Desired Features
Water resistance and day/date is enough
>Preferred strap option
Leather
Thanks

>> No.17254961

>>17254640
>49mm
>make a watch that 90% of your wristlet lanklet customers can't wear
ebin

>> No.17254963

>>17254941
>Dirt defending dirt
Cope, seethe, refer to the chart, etc...

>> No.17254966
File: 169 KB, 775x778, well.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254966

>>17254785

>> No.17254970
File: 176 KB, 799x731, alt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254970

>>17254966

>> No.17254972
File: 62 KB, 598x356, images - 2022-09-19T114735.389_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254972

>>17254640
>>17254961
Wait... 49mm???
REALLY???
LOLOLOLOLOLOL

>> No.17254980

>>17254958
Nodus Sector Pilot Corsair
Casio Oceanus OCW-S100-1AJF
Citizen Promaster Date BN0217-02E
CWC G10
Vaer C5 Tactical Field

buy a chromexcel strap and throw it on any of those

>> No.17254982
File: 2.48 MB, 1549x898, awu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254982

>>17254972
Well it's a rectangular (sort of) watch so it wears different, but it's quite big, too big for many.
49 x 44 x 14.4 mm (1.93 x 1.73 x 0.57 in)

>> No.17254985

>>17254980
>Nodus Sector Pilot Corsair
Sounds like two supervillains.

>> No.17254988

>>17254982
It looks ridiculously big and idiotic.
Average apple retard consumer is fucked. Kek

>> No.17254991

>>17254982
>49 x 44
that shit gonna be like 55mm diagonally from corner to corner

I'm sure most (non fat) people can't actually wear this

>> No.17254993

>>17254982
jesus fucking christ

>> No.17254999
File: 2.15 MB, 2729x2974, 189A2309-E3E6-4826-BE22-75C37398A611.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17254999

Found this in the attic.
How fake is it?
Can I still sell it for a good price?

>> No.17255000

>>17254991
Wasn't this shit intended for athletic wearers?
>Only fat bastards can use it.
All the LOLS

>> No.17255003

>>17254999
Even if original, it won't worth more than a hundred. It's shit, actually.

>> No.17255006

>>17254999
why would anyone fake a tissot
sell it at a yard sale for $50 maybe

>> No.17255007
File: 2.01 MB, 1572x1731, 1663103292431932.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255007

The design is something to think about also.

>> No.17255008

>>17254999
Looks in pretty good condition, I'd just wear it

>> No.17255009

>>17254999
Lol if that bezel is actually gold and the watch is automatic it might be worth $400

>> No.17255010

>>17255009
>Actually gold
>In a Tissot
LOL, NO.

>> No.17255012
File: 1.85 MB, 2441x3024, 7D7EDCF5-725F-411C-AE51-34FC3B8439D0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255012

>>17255003
>>17255006
>>17255008
>>17255009
This is what I found on the back. Never heard of a Tissot with a K

>> No.17255014

>>17255012
K stands for Krono.

>> No.17255015

>>17254367

>self winding watch innovation

The first automatic watch was made by Fortis, you stupid fuck.

>> No.17255016

>>17255012
As I said, it's worth maybe a hundred.

>> No.17255017

>>17254999
these 90s era two tone tissots are worth less than 100 bucks mate it's quartz and half of it is plastic don't fool yourself

>> No.17255019

>>17254980
>Casio Oceanus OCW-S100-1AJF
Im going with this one thanks

>> No.17255023

>>17255010
clearly your aren't familiar with tissot's lineup. I would make fun of you for being so confidently wrong but you will just say im a fag for knowing anything about tissot
https://www.tissotwatches.com/en-us/t9300074104600.html

>> No.17255026
File: 29 KB, 775x525, 1661074590012466.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255026

I really don't get the appeal of smartwatches. You already have a phone. Plus I find it cringe to "wear' a piece of tech like you would wear a piece of jewelry. It's unpersonal.
I'm pretty sure 99% of smartwatchfags got vaxxed, supported BLM and now support Ukraine. Fuck these faggots.

>> No.17255027
File: 627 KB, 1536x2048, 1663607542625.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255027

>>17255019
SEX

>> No.17255028

>>17255012
looks like just a quartz chronograph maybe made in the 90s early 00s

funny seeing it say 200wr when it has chronograph pushers without threads, not sure if it can be trusted

its in a great condition so maybe just... give it away to someone or whatever or list it for $250 online and hope a clueless boomer bites if not just reduce the price i guess

>> No.17255032

>>17255026
Yes we get it you are a loser neet who has devised an elaborate series of personal beliefs that amount to massive cope about how you think you are better than well adjusted normal people with social lives and jobs.

>> No.17255033

>>17254758
>Quartz
I cummed

>> No.17255037

>>17255019
OceANUS is pure class

>> No.17255041

>>17254906
I'm there, I'm still a watch spastic but I don't have a desire to own anymore than what I already have.

>> No.17255042

>>17255032
Cope. I have a good job, make more money than you and get a lot of pussy on Tinder.

>> No.17255045

>>17255027
>>17255037
>>17255019
Can you stop shilling and letting the plebs know? Thanks.

>> No.17255047
File: 241 KB, 1080x1080, 201118_castello_q_mg_neu_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255047

Anyone of you having experiences with this watch?
Wanna buy it as a gift

>> No.17255051

>>17255047
It's a shitter microbrand that makes 'wooden' watches.

>> No.17255052

>>17255045
The only reason you ever heard of the 'anus is because i shill it

>> No.17255063

>>17255047
looks bad senpai
just buy a gshock/baby g if they are just casual friends
its not expensive and they are great watches which don't need any babying and will never go wrong

>> No.17255070

>>17255047
get them an snk41j or something at least man come on now

>> No.17255073

>>17255052
Not him but there's only like 3 or 4 regular posters that own anuses

>> No.17255074

>>17255000
i feel like actual athletes don't care about heart rate or pedometer or whatever else a smartwatch brings to fitness

actual athletes just... exercise.
its the mildly overweight person who uses a smartwatch, runs like 2 miles and impatiently checks his smartwatch every minute and then decides thats a great workout so he rewards himself with a big milkshake after

>> No.17255079

>>17255023
>you will just say im a fag for knowing anything about tissot
Obviously you are. A cock loving faggot whose farts don't sound anymore.
I'm glad we reach an agreement.

>> No.17255082

>>17255073
Yup, and i was shilling it before any of them bought one

>> No.17255085

>>17255074
I love all these elaborate headcannons that /g/ posters have so they can hate people they have never met

>> No.17255087

>>17254303
IS that a peach wrist tat I see peeking out from behind a Tiff signed 1016? IS that you JM or just a fanboy? Either way ill trade om28jm #351/404 straight up for it

>> No.17255089
File: 1.01 MB, 1588x2117, E6CFFE2D-CA5F-4549-911E-8E23819A52AF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255089

>>17254896
Looking forward to the new G-Shock anniversary models.

>> No.17255091

>>17255085
Found the BLM supporter.

>> No.17255095

>>17255085
t. mildly overweight smartwatch wearer who obsesses over junk numbers instead of just concentrating on the exercise

>> No.17255106
File: 22 KB, 739x415, images - 2022-09-19T123739.551.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255106

>>17254896

>> No.17255115

>>17254758
It's still much higher than $400, though.
On the other hand, it is perfect.

>> No.17255127
File: 2.64 MB, 1872x2496, 20220421_020349.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255127

>>17254896
I wore my SSA today after a month or so when i went outside. Wearing the Weekdater atm.

>> No.17255128

>>17255115
You can basically make the same watch with an SNK41J and a Shirakaba dial

>> No.17255133

>>17255082
Maybe, but I got an 'Anus before I discovered /wt/

>> No.17255135

>>17255128
Basically, sure, as in a Pagani Design Daytona is basically the same as a Rolex.

>> No.17255151
File: 381 KB, 2544x4000, dee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255151

>Glashutte Original
>Girard Perregaux
>Blancpain
>Breguet
>Piaget
>Chopard
>Ulysse Nardin
who even buy those brands?

>> No.17255164

> Your budget
£2,000 Great British Crisps
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
Sports everyday wear, that possibly leans toward occasional.
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand wound, quartz
Automatic, thought a nice mecha-quartz is not to be sniffed at.
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd time .zone
Made In Britain to commemorate Her Majesty's passing.
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
Unimportant, though a good bracelet would be welcome in the summer.
> Wrist size or desired watch size
Seven and a half Great British inches.

>> No.17255167

>>17255164
Christopher Ward

>> No.17255173

>>17255151
Actually rich people that don't care about flexing.
You couldn't understand it.

>> No.17255175

>>17255167
Can't really argue with that, though one had rather hoped there might be some undiscovered treasures in these faire Isles.

>> No.17255177

>>17255164
>Made In Britain to commemorate Her Majesty's passing
Buy parts on Aliexpress and assemble a watch yourself. That would be the only way.

>> No.17255181

>>17255164
How about made in china and then mailled by a grumpy old brittish man?
https://www.timefactors.com/collections/smiths/products/smiths-everest-expedition-prs-25
https://www.timefactors.com/products/precista-mission-timer-prs-56
https://www.timefactors.com/collections/armstrong-siddeley/products/armstrong-siddeley-ltd-edition-prs-41

>> No.17255189

>>17255175
Yeah not much even Smiths is HK manufactured.
A decent bit over your budget you could get a Grahams which is fully britbonger loicensed

>> No.17255190

>>17255164
Sounds Great.

>> No.17255194
File: 2.04 MB, 1434x954, An Ordain Fumé Mrk. I.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255194

>>17255167
I had considered An Ordain, given Her Majesty's love of the Hebrides, but not only is there a two year waiting list, but at 38mm they're rather diminutive in stature and perhaps not best suited for someone of my frame.

>>17255181
Ha, I'm not unfamiliar with the gent and his idiosyncratic sales technique, but you might be on to something.

>>17255189
>Grahams which is fully britbonger loicensed

I'm intrigued and will take a quick look, thanks.

>> No.17255196
File: 294 KB, 1024x1024, anOrdain-Model-1-Paynes-Grey-Fume-wrist-shot-square_3bb439d6-6279-4ffb-ac54-fde0b10d8651_1024x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255196

>>17255164
It's a bit more than 2k, but have you thought about Anordain?

>> No.17255198

>>17255175
Not for measly 2k

>> No.17255201

>>17255194
Actually I lied Graham was bought and are now swiss shitters too, sorry mate

>> No.17255204

>>17255196
Indeed I have sir, and I could probably stretch to three thousand crisps if necessary.

>>17255201
Ah, good to know.

>> No.17255207

>>17255194
>two year waiting list
nuke scotland or wherever these glass thingies come from
>but at 38mm they're rather diminutive in stature and perhaps not best suited for someone of my frame.

i think they'll be fine, watches like that arent really meant to be *big* anyway, it'll look more elegant. But yeah thats far more of a dress watch than a sports piece

>> No.17255215

>>17255207
>nuke scotland

I think that might be the secret process to their making those ceramic dials.

> watches like that arent really meant to be *big* anyway, it'll look more elegant...

You raise a fair point, and I'm sure I could carry it off.

>> No.17255223

>>17255215
>I think that might be the secret process to their making those ceramic dials.
A nuked dial. Can you imagine?

>> No.17255236

>>17255223
We dare to dream!

>> No.17255258

>>17254520
This is actually me. If I can't read a watch's time during nighttime after I wake up to take a piss and my eyes are still adjusted to the dark, then I consider that watch worthless.

>> No.17255266
File: 234 KB, 181x179, 1661791266940955.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255266

I only buy Seikos
Thank you for reading

>> No.17255267

>>17254755
That piece of shit costs Baltic like 100€ to produce in asia, and then they sell it for 800, and their argument is "but muh design, muh French company, muh French jobs, muh taxes, muh work and effort you shouldn't have the right to criticize us." straight from the owner on a watch forum with a dude saying that putting a Miyota movement in a 800€ watch is being disrepcteful to customers. I agree with that guy, fuck Baltic and their whining.

>> No.17255276
File: 72 KB, 1024x680, 1663614298134.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255276

Not much of a smifs guy but a mission timer huh....

>> No.17255278

>>17255267
I know it's hard to understand for commies, but the point of a company is to make profit.

>> No.17255280

>>17255266
based, love seiko, citizen and rolex the most

>> No.17255297
File: 206 KB, 1439x882, 1663614726772.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255297

GOD DAMN IT DHL

>> No.17255308

>>17255297
Did you pay your duties yet?

>> No.17255326

>>17255194
>38mm they're rather diminutive in stature and perhaps not best suited for someone of my frame.
They wear bigger than you would think, but a two year waiting list is a bit much

>> No.17255329

>>17255267
you're in for a shocker once you find out how businesses make money

>> No.17255330

>>17255276
Yeah, and its a quartz chrono with an actually decent movement in it, ETA temp corrected high accuracy quartz, i think the precidrive quartz movements are rated for ±20 seconds per year.

>> No.17255334

>>17255297
LOL

>> No.17255336

>>17255329
Not that anon but i do a pretty good job buying handmade and semi luxury goods without the mandatory 1000% corporate markup over COM by buying directly from talented artisans. Its not that easy with affordable watches but you can do much better than paying $1000 for a tissot or hamilton that cost them $80 to make.

>> No.17255346
File: 135 KB, 896x1226, 1661803919422030.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255346

I love Rolex Explorer so much its unreal.

>> No.17255349

>>17255346
polar is better

>> No.17255357

>>17255349
>polar
Rolex Explorer II white dial?

>> No.17255358

>>17255357
ya

>> No.17255372

>>17255308
Nah it's not customs, its scheduled for a "future delivery cycle"

>> No.17255374

>>17255336
if it costs 80$ to make then you make it dickhead
a modern graphics card has like 3$ worth of materials I wonder why you don't just make them yourself clown

>> No.17255378

>>17255330
Its still overpriced for just a Sinn homage, and you have to deal with smifs and his (lack of) QC.

>> No.17255383

>>17255374
now I want a graphics card inspired dial

>> No.17255387

>>17255358
I just like the Explorer family. I don't like the other modern Rolex.

>> No.17255388

Rolex ruined my life.

>> No.17255390

>>17255388
how?

>> No.17255392

Why do watches release so much dopamine
I thought I would eventually get over it but no.
Am I autistic?

>> No.17255400

>>17255388
>>17255390
When a real man finds his Rolex, he doesn't need anything else.

>> No.17255401

I hate rolex

>> No.17255405

>>17255400
was looking at a two-tone datejust, but I think that the silver ones look better

>> No.17255413

Talking about watches is talking about Rolex

>> No.17255414
File: 239 KB, 600x600, 1663618234237.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255414

Bros...

>> No.17255420

>>17255414
A Panerai looking like a normal watch? What is going on?

>> No.17255421

>>17255413
you have to admit, that guy took a long time to make up the brand name and this was incredibly well invested

>> No.17255425

>>17255390
The Rolex AD slapped the breitling off my wrist and called it
>shiteling
and automatically put me on the list for a black oyster perpetual. I DONT EVEN LIKE THAT COLOR!

>> No.17255430

>>17255425
I think the AD actually saved your life there

>> No.17255437

>>17255378
>and you have to deal with smifs and his (lack of) QC.
The guys a pain in the ass but his "lack of qc" is entirely based on some slap fight between the owner and some guy that bought a watch from him that you heard about third hand.

>> No.17255443

>>17255437
Its all over and his weird cult will attack you if you post about it ANYWHERE
Randomrob had a video about a defective smifs a few months ago and he took it down because they were having a kiwifarms-esque raid on him.

>> No.17255455

>>17255443
>Its all over
Okay then give me some links so i can read about it. Im interested in getting a watch from him

>> No.17255482

Tudor ranger is based.

>> No.17255488

>>17254301
>dark cockpits
t. never ever sat in the cockpit of an aircraft and never will
but I'm sure that light is gonna be really useful on your next Ryanair flight, faggot

>> No.17255497

>>17255026
the main benefits of a smartwatch relate to physical exercise (HR and activity tracking) and having money to spend (NFC payments), so obviously it's not anything you can relate to.
also it's "impersonal" you ESL povertytard.

>> No.17255504
File: 12 KB, 300x224, 1659663355303222.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255504

>>17255497
>ESL calling others ESL
You stupid moron.

>> No.17255521

>>17255414
lmfao more like beware monstrum

>> No.17255566
File: 40 KB, 636x480, 207_094.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255566

For me it's the Kitt Commlink.

>> No.17255586

Black bay pro looks good as fuck for $3000

>> No.17255592
File: 261 KB, 1640x1094, 1663625021955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255592

>>17255586
Imma let you finish, but the 39mm pelagos is the greatest $3,000 watch of all time.
Its also a full 4mm thinner than the bb pro

>> No.17255594

>>17255586
yeah man pure horologique
a watch that costs as much as a car looks really fucking good who would have thought

>> No.17255596
File: 383 KB, 763x1111, 27_2001-00_frontIp8RicSJ2WlBM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255596

Form A

>> No.17255598
File: 648 KB, 786x746, form a black forest.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255598

>>17255596

>> No.17255602
File: 94 KB, 1280x720, form a titan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255602

>>17255598

>> No.17255604

>>17255594
>a watch that costs as much as a car
Man this isint 2002 anymore nobody is out here buying a car for 3 grand unless you live in Bosnia or some shit

>> No.17255606

>>17255604
I'm the Tudor poster and there's a used car dealer selling good mileage insured user cars at 3k.
>>17255592
Looks good.

>> No.17255608

>>17255604
you know what I mean don't be a faggot

>> No.17255610
File: 85 KB, 1024x726, 101-139-2022-2-detail-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255610

>>17255594
>watches at 3k look goo-

>> No.17255624
File: 861 KB, 1878x2129, 20220625_072011~3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255624

>>17255610
Indeed

>> No.17255630

>>17255624
Unironically if you remove the logo this looks like a 300$ casio

>> No.17255645

Considering removing myself from the Oyster Perpetual list and getting a Ranger instead.

>> No.17255647

>>17255630
It keeps very good time, something no Casio has ever been able to achieve

>> No.17255651
File: 484 KB, 600x900, shakudō.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255651

>> No.17255652

>>17255624
Kino.

>> No.17255653

>>17255645
No one will care about your Basedster Perpetual anyways

>> No.17255656

>>17255653
I don't really care what other people think I just want a watch I like with good finishing and will last a long time.

>> No.17255660

>>17255026
Lmao get a fucking grip. Most people think a $500 mall shitter is a nice watch. So an Apple Watch is a nice watch in their mind.
Throw in the fact that they have cellular now, Bluetooth, etc. You could completely ditch your phone and function a whole day with just your Apple Watch w/ cell and some AirPods. Hell you can even order your shitty Starbucks with apply pay. Not to mention the health stuff.
It’s pretty obvious most people don’t give a shit about expensive, inaccurate and outdated watches.

>> No.17255663
File: 1.10 MB, 3024x4032, 6j3484mkv9q61[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255663

>here ya go, son.
>it's your grandfather's PATEK PHILLIPE
>he left it to you, because he heard you like watches

How do you respond?

>> No.17255665

>>17255663
Sell it and buy another model, unless I was especially attached to my grampa.

>> No.17255668

>>17255663
With gratitude, like any normal ass person would.

>> No.17255669
File: 64 KB, 825x700, gw50001jf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255669

My 2009 DW5600E flooded. I opened it up and the main O ring snapped. I think there was also a leak around one of the pushers. Looked pretty bad in there.

Should I get a picrel replacement? What's out there these days in terms of square models? Any good shit on the horizon?

>> No.17255670

>>17255663
Thank you. But as you know, you never truly own a Patek.

>> No.17255671

>>17255663
I sell it and put the money in an index fund for my kids
gramps would have understood

>> No.17255673

>>17255671
Buy some I bonds

>> No.17255674
File: 1.24 MB, 1052x1317, ik308lbnhbb71.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255674

>>17255669
GW-M5610U-1JF
nothing comes close and I am not only talking about gshocks

>> No.17255675

>>17255674
I've wanted one of these for a long time, but you'd really get it over the GW-5000-1JF?

>> No.17255676

>>17255674
I am interested. Why this one? Because it doesn’t do Bluetooth?

>> No.17255678

>>17255675
If you are going to gwt a 5000 get the 5000u-1jf
Don't fucking bitch about the backlight you are just autistic and cant cope with change well, you will get used to it in 10 minutes, the old 5000 doesn't show you the current time on the countdown or stopwatch screens

>> No.17255683

>>17255675
I'm out camping and hiking a lot and I like that it's smaller and lighter than the 5000 (also not a fan of that screwback), you almost don't feel it on the wrist

>>17255676
it's simple and does everything I need from a watch, newer squares are too bulky in my opinion and bluetooth is a gimmick that's just not for me

>> No.17255684

>>17255665
>>17255671
Souless anon

>> No.17255687

>>17255678
I'm scared of change, does the new light have better viewing angles?

>> No.17255693

>>17255687
Yes, the only legitimate complaint about it is that its a bit on the bright side if you are in pitch black conditions. But the increased brightness improves the visibility in dim lighting

>> No.17255696

>>17255693
ty you anon for giving me more shit to waffle over

>> No.17255710

>>17255151
I own a Blancpain, and Piaget makes beautiful watches. I'll likely buy one of those someday. You should stick to your G-Shocks.

>> No.17255718

>>17255710
>it's a swiss watch kind of like a- oh yeah no I could have bought a rolex but this one is also swiss with a lot of history behind it
>y-yeah no BLANK-PAIN yeah it's french for something

>> No.17255722

>>17254367
These 'iconic' designs were stole from smaller brands. Marketing is and continues to be the only thing going for Rolex

>> No.17255731

>>17255722
>muh marketing
Rolex barely spends anything on advertising and marketing. The people market the product for them.

>> No.17255733

>>17255718
And there's your problem. You buy watches to show other people. I buy watches because I love them.

>> No.17255734

>>17255624
Why did they discontinue this?
Why was it not sold on a bracelet?

>> No.17255736
File: 39 KB, 474x474, OIP (18).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255736

>>17255734
no idea
they replaced it with this model
its very attractive also, comes in a white version as well

>> No.17255743
File: 2.49 MB, 3024x4032, 1663631272718.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255743

>>17255736
Its ugly as fuck
Angular design does not work with tonneau cases.
The only good GS designs are from 50 years ago, fuck this brand.

>> No.17255744

>>17255743
ESL tier holy moly

>> No.17255745

>>17255743
That's not a tonneau case, retard.

>> No.17255749

>>17255745
Yes it is you stupid faggot
The entire case is a single cushion with no discreet elements or lugs
Kill yourself GSoi

>> No.17255750

>>17255733
that's why you brag about owning a swiss shitter to randoms on a kurdish yodeling recital website sure bud

>> No.17255751

>>17255731
>Rolex barely spends anything on advertising and marketing.
lol, right. Formula 1 plasters Rolex all over their races out of their generous spirit.

If you don't see Rolex marketing all over the place, you're probably only consuming media for poor people who can't afford Rolexes so there's no need to market to them.

>> No.17255752
File: 233 KB, 1536x2048, faKs9Kr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255752

>>17255743
i wouldnt mind the white version, i think the case is unique. i already have a few sport watches, and have been wanting a more formal piece tho.

>> No.17255754
File: 131 KB, 821x1200, 1662063554330970.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255754

>>17255749
>I don't know what tonneau means
Okay, retard.

>> No.17255756

>>17255733
>You buy watches to show other people. I buy watches because I love them.
>I own a Blancpain. You should stick to your G-Shocks.
Does not compute

>> No.17255758

>>17255750
It's not a brag to explain to plebs that there are people of taste who appreciate the work from brands such as Blancpain, Piaget, Breguet, or Chopard.

>> No.17255759
File: 41 KB, 474x632, OIP (13).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255759

>>17255758
C H O P A R D
H
O
P
A
R
D

>> No.17255762

>>17255756
I don't care for G-Shocks.

>> No.17255764

>>17255751
>If you don't watch race cars go in a circle you're poor.
I'm wearing a Rolex right now. They don't need marketing. It's just that good of a product.
Cope.

>> No.17255766

>>17255754
Its literally the case shape you posted but wider
Are you blind or retarded?

>> No.17255768

>>17255766
It literally isn't, are you actually retarded or just pretending?

>> No.17255771
File: 2.16 MB, 280x358, 1661466109620909.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255771

>>17255743
THIS
H
I
S

>> No.17255777

>>17255743
average asian girl after turning 25

>> No.17255784

>>17255759
Pretty.

>> No.17255820

>>17255777
True, but she'll also look exactly like that when she's nearly 80.

>> No.17255823

>>17255764
>I got tricked by marketing which is why you're coping because...you just are!
Also, post your replic-- I mean, your Rolex. :^)

>> No.17255824
File: 63 KB, 1029x772, 1663032331866103.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255824

>>17255743
Please, don't post trannies in the wt.

>> No.17255828

>>17255823
>Rolex is like, all over the place man, it's like McDonald's with aggressive advertising.

Nope. If you're rich or well off, wear a Rolex.
Shrimple as.

>> No.17255831

>>17255823
Refer to the chart.

>> No.17255833

>>17255828
You must have forgotten to post your image with your post, I guess.

>> No.17255836

>>17255823
Omegay tard SEETHING LOL.

>> No.17255879

>>17255831
I can't see your Rolex in the chart. Post your Rolex.

>> No.17255884
File: 827 KB, 1079x1386, Screenshot_20220919_183944.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255884

I'm dumb but how do I take out the stem of this vintage seiko quartz? What nub do I have to press?

>> No.17255885

>>17255884
No idea, push down that tab beside the stem maybe?

>> No.17255886

>>17255884
A lot of old Seikos had split stems, pull the crown out to the setting position and see if squeezing it with tweezers releases it. It will look like it's split down the middle.

>> No.17255921

>>17255884
Do a little search on the movement, perhaps you can find sone instructions.

>> No.17255954

This "interest" is more cringe and nerdy than dungeons and dragons

>> No.17255955

>>17255954
can't be worse than posting on 4chan

>> No.17255967

parmigiani

>> No.17255990
File: 1002 KB, 1079x1436, Screenshot_20220919_201809.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255990

>>17255884
Found it .. apparently the crown needed to be all the way in. And the tab is here

>> No.17255997
File: 2.50 MB, 2571x2304, 20220803_123834.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17255997

>>17255990
Can you show us the front of the watch?

>> No.17256007

>>17255756
really?
is your brain really incapable of working properly?

>> No.17256009

Seiko more like gayko

>> No.17256010

>>17255954
All this religion aside, people who can't kill will always be subject to those who can.

>> No.17256116

https://youtu.be/_BD52eP784Q?t=2328

Rolex Forever

>> No.17256120

>>17254755
>fake patina
Lmaoing at your life

>> No.17256127

new
>>17256126
>>17256126
>>17256126
>>17256126
>>17256126

>> No.17256222

>>17255047
one of my colleagues has one, the clock face was cracked on arrival, he got a return no questions asked.

>> No.17256455

>>17256120
Is the faux patina in the room with us right now?

>> No.17256564

>>17256455
Hell no, I don’t buy gay shit like that