[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 131 KB, 862x862, profilepics.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17206918 No.17206918 [Reply] [Original]

When are they ok? When are they not ok?

>> No.17206923

The stranger the sunglasses, the lower the IQ and cognitive awareness.

>> No.17206990

>>17206918
They're ok when the sun is out and it makes it easier for you to see. Outdoors or in the car.
Please don't wear them indoors.
Personally, I like aviators.

>> No.17206993

>>17206923
But what about Elton?
>inb4 le fag

>> No.17206996

Sunglasses are actually bad for your eyes. If you wear them all the time your eyes actually get weaker because they don't have to work as hard. There's a reason why people have to wear those super thick and super dark sunglasses after they get eye surgery. It's because their eyes are weak from the procedure and need to recover their strength before they can deal with sunlight again. So imagine wearing sunglasses all the time and gimping your eyes. Wearing sunglasses is the eyeball equivalent of riding a motorized scooter everywhere, it'll atrophy all the muscles in your legs.

>> No.17207476

>>17206923
cope

>> No.17207478

>>17206990
>Please don't wear them indoors.
mine are prescription and I usually can't be assed to switch them if I run inside somewhere. surprisingly I've only had maybe 2 people ask what the fuck I was doing

>> No.17207483

>>17206918
The image is referring to the trend for middle age right wing people to have a picture of them with sunglasses as their profile pic. Sunglasses should be worn anytime you are outside during the day, just make sure to choose a classic style

>> No.17208567
File: 652 KB, 653x754, come with me.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17208567

I not look like them guys

>> No.17208577

>>17206918
These kinds of sunglasses were considered manly effay back in the 1980s and early 1990s, when they were young: see (literally) "The *Macho* Man" Randy Savage and Bret Hart; these sunglasses are that but toned down for average dudes.

>> No.17208609

>>17206996
yep. I wear them generally only in the car when glare is an issue.

>> No.17208639

>>17206993
He was also a junkie, just like every other pop star.

>> No.17209228

>>17206990
>not ironically wearing sunglasses at night

>> No.17209236
File: 36 KB, 500x367, 01001A30-0BDA-467A-8111-7708DF04C332.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17209236

>>17206918
Yellow tints = outrageously based
Black tints = safe
Purple tints = feminine aesthetic
Blue tints = boomer
Green tints = Effay

>> No.17209266

>>17209236
I am a red mirrored tint cyclops

>> No.17209277

>>17206996
Nice bro science faggot.

>> No.17209628

>>17206996
>It's because their eyes are weak from the procedure and need to recover their strength before they can deal with sunlight again
Pretty sure it's because their pupils are dilated and they're incredibly sensitive to light.

>> No.17209639

>>17209628
>>It's because their eyes are weak from the procedure and need to recover their strength before they can deal with sunlight again
>Pretty sure it's because their pupils are dilated and they're incredibly sensitive to light.

yeah, he's talking shit.
The reason sunglasses are bad for you is that a lot of them aren't polarized or have UV protection. Your eyes don't squint as much when you wear them but the lack of protection allows in all the ultraviolet which damages them.

>> No.17209873
File: 20 KB, 640x360, 112403-1532336916.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17209873

>>17209266
based
>>17207483
>middle age right wing
authoritarian or libertarian right? settling a dispute

>> No.17209880

>>17209873
A lot of them are veterans or LARPers. While you’d think they’d be more authoritarian given their service, they’ve seen the bullshit and distrust the government as they’ve had to deal with its incompetence firsthand.

>> No.17209881
File: 816 KB, 2460x3280, j3z6z3xgtzk51.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17209881

>>17209873
Clearly authoritarian. Libertarian rights wear these

>> No.17209882

>>17209639
>he doesn’t stare at the sun to strengthen his eyes

>> No.17209887
File: 124 KB, 881x960, 1593758560648.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17209887

>>17209880
>>17209881
personally I think they're lib right like in picrelated, but the homie thinks they're auth right

>> No.17209893

>>17209887
The thing that conflates it is trade protectionism in immigration and tariffs was a huge deal for trump voters. Really not libertarian at all.

>> No.17209898
File: 92 KB, 524x512, IMG_20220801_202659_633.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17209898

>>17206918
They are always okay.

>> No.17209925

>>17206918
Their always okay op. You just gotta slime more :^). No smile with shades makes you look like and unfun faggot or a douche

>> No.17209927

>>17208567
Oh man. I wish I was as cool as that guy

>> No.17209928

>when are they ok?
when it's sunny out
>when are they not ok?
when it's not sunny out

>> No.17209953
File: 574 KB, 1233x1800, they+live+poster.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17209953

>>17206918
>ok
you mean oakley?

>> No.17210261
File: 179 KB, 1080x718, 9402c196329e33654402babe9212277a_1200x1200.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17210261

for me, its the Lazer Face

>> No.17210267

>>17209928
I started wearing sunglasses at night. People with masks come up to me and say "why are you wearing sunglasses at night? They don't do anything." and I just laugh.

>> No.17210275

>>17210261
jizzed in my pants

>> No.17210291

>>17210267
based

>> No.17210398

>>17206918
you look like a douche if you wear them indoors. wraparounds also look fucking cringe.
otherwise good for protecting your eyes and as a fashion piece, getting the right frames for your head shape might be tricky though

>> No.17210414

>>17210267
I'll take shit that didn't happen for 500, Alex.