/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.17188732]

what went wrong?
what's the endgame?

[Anonymous No.17188736]

>>17188732
nothing, high waisted pants were always the norm and make everyone look better

[Anonymous No.17188739]

>>17188736
Fatty

[Anonymous No.17188740]

>>17188736
coping fat girl spotted

[Anonymous No.17188780]

>>17188736
Skinny twink here. This anon is entirely correct. Detractors don't seem to realize most women don't expose their stomachs with their outfits every day which is the sole application in which low rise looks good.

[Anonymous No.17188787]

>>17188732
Low cut is making a comeback.

[Anonymous No.17188808]

>>17188732
Right looks better though and follows the natural curvature of the body, men look better in high rise too, there is a reason it was the norm for centuries.

[Anonymous No.17188809]

Fat bitches are too lazy to hit the gym, so stores adapted to sell more jeans.
I miss seeing Nelly Furtado in those

[Anonymous No.17188816]

>>17188739
>>17188740
fat women dont care and will justify what ever their pants are, high waisted has always been in because it makes your legs look longer and goes up to the natural waist and follows the natural curves of the body

[Anonymous No.17188822]

>>17188739
>>17188740
You have no argument other than this. High rise simply looks better, on both skinny and fat girls.

[Anonymous No.17188830]

>>17188816
>high waisted has always been in because it makes your legs look longer
This, why would you purposefully fuck up your proportions by wearing low rise and make your legs looks shorter, man or women. Also only 15 year olds get turned on by seeing mid riff.

It's simply done by greedy as fuck companies to save on fabric and there not even comfortable, when i switched to high rise i never looked back. My shirt never untucks and my cock and bollocks have more space.

[Anonymous No.17188859]

>>17188732
>what's the endgame?
To change the fashions every year so that you have to buy new stuff.
Otherwise, nobody would buy stuff until it wore out.

[Anonymous No.17188864]

>>17188830 (You)

[Anonymous No.17188866]

>>17188732
Feminism happened

[Anonymous No.17188892]

>>17188866
Are you really this stupid?

[Anonymous No.17188903]

>>17188864
they are all old and ugly, but look better with high rise than low rise

[Anonymous No.17188904]

>>17188732
>what's the endgame?
unless the keep going up after that, into denim bourkas.

[Anonymous No.17188940]

>>17188864
Whats wrong with a milfy housewife?

[Anonymous No.17189361]

>>17188830
The midriff isn't the turn on, it's the nearly exposed pussy.

[Anonymous No.17189382]

>>17188732
the end game is to abolish all beauty standards for women

[Anonymous No.17189389]

>>17189361
you fucking coomers are all degenerates. You really think people should just walk around like that? Would you get turned on if your mom dressed like that? Idiot

[Anonymous No.17189393]

>>17188739
Have you ever seen a fat girl in high rise jeans? They look like complete shit, even worse than they would in a lower rise.

[Anonymous No.17189394]

>>17189389
I don't terribly care for the style. I was just point out that you missed the point of it. That being said I am a degenerate.

[Anonymous No.17189397]

>>17189361
>nearly exposed pussy
>eight to ten inches away from the top of low rise jeans

[Anonymous No.17189405]

>>17189397
You're being intentionally obtuse.

[Anonymous No.17189444]

>>17188903
>bourkas
>Cant recognize an SNL skit
Zoomer spotted

[Anonymous No.17189514]

>>17188732
Fatties

[Anonymous No.17189524]

>>17188732
For me, it's not even low-rise vs. high-rise. Skinny jeans just look ugly in general, high-rise or low-rise. The recent popularity of high-rise flared pants proved me that. Thank god they're on their way out. That said, low-rise don't fuck up the proportions of everyone. You can't generalize like that. It's not just a "low-rise fit skinny people better" either. It entirely depends on the body build of the wearer i.e. their waist size, their hips size, their torso length, their height, their legs size. Also, while girls in low-rise can look really fine, there's indeed no point to it if she's not wearing a crop-top. On a final point, low-rise clothing was also a thing or two before the 2000s.

[Anonymous No.17189708]

>>17189361
>see slight tummy
>makes your legs look like tiny baby legs
not worth it

[Anonymous No.17189713]

>tfw midriff has been back for years
>tfw there are coomers that refuse to leave their house that will bitch about midriff not being fashionable anymore until it has gone out of fashion again
>they will just keeping bitching about it forever

[Anonymous No.17189769]

>>17189708
I agree. I was just explaining to anons the point of the style

[Anonymous No.17189772]

>>17189361
Are you a virgin? you can see a pussy at the click of a button these days. It takes more creativity then that to turn me on these days now that i'm older. Slaggy everyday clothes don't do it for me anymore. It's got to be lingerie and stuff like that.

[Anonymous No.17189773]

>>17189772
You're a fucking retard man.

[Anonymous No.17189775]

>>17189773
Why?

[Anonymous No.17189780]

>>17189773
Once you have seen a few pussies and can get it anytime you want shit like this doesn't turn you on anymore, especially as you get into your thirties. Only literal 15 year old boys get turned on by this shit, i would know i was around that age when this shit was popular, now i don't think much of it.

[Anonymous No.17189782]

>>17189775
>Are you a virgin?
Bro, I'm not trying to explain my own personal feelings about the style. I simply explained part of why the style was popular. It was tantalizing. Yes it would take more to turn a grown man on. I'm 29, I'm assuming you're around my age. Seeing just that won't be enough at this point. However it would serve its purpose and at the very least get us to take a second look. It would express something about the woman's' character, that she's probably loose. Which again is the point of style. To convey a little about yourself.

[Anonymous No.17189880]

>>17189444
>SNL
actually who cares

[Anonymous No.17189882]

>>17189880
Trump lost

[Anonymous No.17189885]

The leftists are pushing an agenda to put more meat on womens bones and promote wide hips and big butts. This is so when communism is implemented we will have prime breeding stock and lots of meat to harvest. Republicans are in on this too. You think the raid of mar a lago is about trump? Kek. It must be nice to have the wool over your eyes

[Anonymous No.17190050]

>>17188892
Filthy roastie or tranny.

[Anonymous No.17190101]

>>17188732
>both skinny jeans
>both trash

All those morons fighting for wichever not even understanding that both type of pants can be enjoyable as long as you are building a coherent silhouette.

Ffs anons if you had been here long enough you'd know that /fa/ is just fighting for whatever is in fashion while constantly being 2-3 years late, that's why they are now being aggressive towards dunks and forums while they are rocking gazelle which were in fashion 3 years ago, stop being retarded i fucking beg you, form has purpose and yojr goal should not be to judge a form but to try to understand its function

[Anonymous No.17190169]

>>17188732
>+30lbs
/threas

[Anonymous No.17190259]

>>17189885
Actual communism(based on class relations and class conflict) has been irrelevant for over 30 years. You people have no idea what communism actually is, you think it's western liberalism, it isn't and never has been. What the fuck have wide hips got to do with pushing towards a classless and stateless society.

[Anonymous No.17190355]

>>17189885
Nice fiction, would make a funny scifi comedy, idk why communism is involved tho, i dont remember those parts of das kapital lmao

[Anonymous No.17190374]

>high waisted pants

[Anonymous No.17190381]

>>17189444
I know it was SNL, SNL fucking sucks shit

[Anonymous No.17190383]

imagine any red blooded male not wanting to see left over right, imagine a world where women weren't too fucking fat to wear it.

[Anonymous No.17190385]

>>17188732
>what went wrong?
people got fat
>what's the endgame?
cover up the gut

[Anonymous No.17190394]

>>17190374

[Anonymous No.17190395]

>>17188830
Taller men look better with legs that appear shorter than normal. They have so much length that they don't want it to dominate their appearance.

[Anonymous No.17190398]

>>17190395
>Taller men look better with legs that appear shorter than normal. They have so much length that they don't want it to dominate their appearance.

no they dont, high waisted pants look good on everyone and that is how pants should be worn

[Anonymous No.17190432]

>>17190259
Nobody is a classical Marxist anymore. Read Gramsci, dumbfuck.

[Anonymous No.17190486]

>>17190432
>Nobody is a classical Marxist anymore
bullshit. Nothing i see what is going on is ''communism'' why would the ruling groups and corporations want to a spread an ideology what seeks it's destruction. They wouldn't and communism doesn't even have to be socially liberal. If actual communists had some power there would be strikes every week and hunger marches like in the thirties, not someone just getting into university because they may be gay or black.

[Anonymous No.17190502]

>>17188732
>what went wrong?
The woman on the left weighs 20lbs more and would look like shit in low wasted jeans.
Fattys happened

[Anonymous No.17190510]

>>17190502
*woman on the right

[Anonymous No.17190518]

>>17190486
this is true, but as a leftists all others around me are people who like blm, and lgbt. I talked about how mass immigration undermines workers rights and how lgbt is not natural and healthy and they thought i was a trump supporter

[Anonymous No.17190526]

>>17190518
You are an old fashioned leftist, not the modern type like them, i'm the same as you honestly, the more working class leftists are usually like this.
>>17190502
Fatties were common when low rise like was popular in the early-mid 2000's and it wasn't a good look seeing their hip blubber and bellies go over the jeans. It wasn't that long ago.

[Anonymous No.17190542]

>>17190526
>You are an old fashioned leftist,

yes, also a traditionalist catholic too.

>the more working class leftists are usually like this.

here in Canada it is very rare, they only care about LGBT, BLM, and Video games. they do nothing for actual working class people and workers rights, gun rights, housing

[Anonymous No.17190545]

>>17189524
2000s low rise was lower than 70s low rise

[Anonymous No.17190690]

>>17189708
Only if you wear skinny jeans or you're fat. Again, it never was low-rise vs high-rise.

>>17190101
Left isn't skinny jeans, but they do look like shit too I guess.

[Anonymous No.17190767]

>>17190259
>>17190355
I’m just having fun gentlemen. I was sure it would be obvious that it was a wildly ignorant, satirical post

[Anonymous No.17190784]

>>17190394
>mogs every low waisted pic

[Anonymous No.17190795]

>>17190767
It's hard to tell that's exactly how some people talk.

[Anonymous No.17190899]

>>17188732
The 2022 is better, but I'm glad we live in the era where women wear both. We are truly blessed.
>>17188736
The woman on the right is such a fucking dime

[Anonymous No.17190940]

>>17188732
Women look so ugly in high rise

[Anonymous No.17190956]

Low rise > High rise

[Anonymous No.17190977]

>>17190940
are you a fag?

[Anonymous No.17190996]

>>17189393
post examples?

[Anonymous No.17191005]

Is it even possible to bring low rise pants back when every single girl is ashamed of her stomach?

[Anonymous No.17191013]

I really fucking hate fat girls

[Anonymous No.17191016]

>>17191013
Why?

[Anonymous No.17191019]

>>17190977
They look better in low rise

[Anonymous No.17191024]

>>17191016
Imagine being peak physiological efficiency with all of the knowledge available and one still just cant help themselves not go MMMM TATHTY like a stupid 8 year old boy whose hands are glued to a nintendo when not pillaging franeknfood out of plastic bags as he runs around in public, sloppily weaving between an unimpressed crowd. Have some fucking dignity. Average american woman is 5'4 170lbs for christssake.

[Anonymous No.17191033]

>>17191024
so you hate fat girls or just fat people in general?
girls are always going to be considered hot by a lot of people regardless of weight.
Just check instagram or tinder and you will see that any fat girl with a high waist jean is considered "thicc"

[Anonymous No.17191042]

>>17191033
Fat dudes can be useful during low intensity physical labor. Also i am not trying to fuck dudes nor treat them gently.

[Anonymous No.17191117]

>>17188732
both look bad just wear a skirt

[Anonymous No.17191151]

>>17188736
Correct opinion. Just look how great and classic the broad on the right looks

[Anonymous No.17191163]

>>17190956

[Anonymous No.17191194]

>>17191163

[Anonymous No.17191201]

>>17188816
High rise makes girls look like midgets and hides the curves from the torso which makes girls look ugly, low rise with hourglass figure is the most erotic fashion trend

[Anonymous No.17191204]

>>17188830
Midriff is even sexier than cleavage

[Anonymous No.17191219]

>>17189713
I don't care about the outside world, I care about the media, I want to see low rise midriff bearing hot girls in movies and videogames

[Anonymous No.17191224]

>>17191033
>"thicc"
that's just fagspeak for fat
nobody likes fat except chubby chasers and there's only like two of them on the planet and they're both disgusting fetishists from somewhere in southern india

[Anonymous No.17191230]

>>17191163
Low rise bros....

[Anonymous No.17191239]

>>17189713
literally this midriff is always in style for all women any time it's over 70 degrees

[Anonymous No.17191267]

>>17189389

[Anonymous No.17191274]

>>17191194

[Anonymous No.17191312]

>>17191274
I actually find that hot to be honest

[Anonymous No.17191334]

>>17191312
man she's built like a tall lanky middle school boy

[Anonymous No.17191364]

>>17188732

Diarrea 24/7 in 2001, not joking, all the girls arrived late in school to dump brown liquids

[Anonymous No.17191367]

>>17188739

Fat girls are the ones can't use them

[Anonymous No.17191377]

>>17188732
Left is trashy and repulsive.
Right is trashy too (too tight, showing off curves) but not nearly as bad as the left.

[Anonymous No.17191398]

>>17191377
did you read any bible scriptures before logging on to your favorite far right extremist anime forum today

[Anonymous No.17191426]

>>17188736
peak female fashion, its a shame they dont look like this anymore

[Anonymous No.17191442]

>>17191367
This

[Anonymous No.17191458]

This is peak female fashion

[Anonymous No.17191466]

>>17190956
No, but those are really nice handjob nails.

[Anonymous No.17191483]

>>17191458
>0 curves
brutal

[Anonymous No.17191504]

Nothing beats low rise

[Anonymous No.17191506]

>>17191483
She still looks great

[Anonymous No.17191508]

>>17191458
trannycore lmfao

[Anonymous No.17191518]

>>17191504

[Anonymous No.17191524]

>>17188736
Wrong, high rise looks plain bad. Makes women look like shapeless dorks.

[Anonymous No.17191527]

>>17191524
Anon,.. why you think they are so popular?

[Anonymous No.17191536]

>>17191524
>Makes women look like shapeless dorks.
projecting low rise cons onto high rise pants is amazing lmao

[Anonymous No.17191541]

>>17188736
I look at vintage photo and think of hairy pussy and my pp get hard

[Anonymous No.17191546]

>>17191518
She would look better in low rise

[Anonymous No.17191548]

>>17191527
This, high rise popular cause it let's them hide their fatness

[Anonymous No.17191553]

>>17188732
Low rise makes no sense anatomy-wise, high rise actually sits where the natural waistline is.

[Anonymous No.17191559]

>>17191548
>>17191527
>>17191524
samefagging for lowrise lul

[Anonymous No.17191566]

Low rise is the superior choice, Stacys wear low rise and Chads love women in low rise, it's just nature

[Anonymous No.17191572]

>>17191559
>doesn't know how to check for samefags
newfaggot

[Anonymous No.17191581]

>>17191566
>reddit speak
how will low rise bros ever recover...

[Anonymous No.17191583]

>>17191483
Meanwhile, in high-rise land...

>>17191553
Low-rise sits where the body bends.

[Anonymous No.17191586]

>>17191524
It's on purpose by feminist, to look like males.

[Anonymous No.17191594]

>>17188732
high rise anything looks better than low rise

[Anonymous No.17191596]

what about high rise vs low rise for men?

[Anonymous No.17191599]

>>17191596
We men don't wear high rise, only Clint Eastwood and old men wear high rise, it looks just as stupid as women in high rise

[Anonymous No.17191600]

>>17188732
There isn't a single straight man who would prefer the left look over the right look in a blind taste test

[Anonymous No.17191603]

Don't mind me, just posting the superior low rise

[Anonymous No.17191604]

>>17191599
why not just say that high rise is retarded?

[Anonymous No.17191608]

>>17191603
>Don't mind me, just posting the superior low rise
>doesn't post low rise
lol, lmao

[Anonymous No.17191611]

>>17191596
high rise = instant kino

[Anonymous No.17191618]

>>17191608
If you can see her navel it's low rise

[Anonymous No.17191621]

For Low Rise Lover Chads

[Anonymous No.17191628]

High Rise Lovers

[Anonymous No.17191630]

>>17191628
say that to his face and not online and see what happens

[Anonymous No.17191644]

>>17191630
He'd say you are right, then he would buy low rise and Stacys would swarm him immediately, then he would thank me for showing him the light

[Anonymous No.17191657]

>>17188732
For low rise to look good, you actually need a flat navel. With high rise, girls can hide their fat gut.

[Anonymous No.17191659]

No one said you had to pair low-rise pants with a crop-top. Picrel looked pretty cute with a normal length shirt. Long-tops can fuck off though.

[Anonymous No.17191660]

High Rise

[Anonymous No.17191663]

>>17191659
This, crop tops look better, but normal shirts work too

[Anonymous No.17191664]

>>17188732
how come to only argument against high rise is that "muh fatties wear it" as if it changes the fact that skinny people look better in high rise than low rise

[Anonymous No.17191665]

>>17191664
Not really, skinny people look better in low rise

[Anonymous No.17191671]

>>17188732
>THICC women
nothing, absolutely nothing went wrong

[Anonymous No.17191678]

Average Low Rise Enjoyer

[Anonymous No.17191683]

>>17191274
>>17191163
>foreshortening makes your legs look shorter
Makes you think if it's really the low-rise's fault...

[Anonymous No.17191689]

[Anonymous No.17191690]

>>17191334
The things I'd do to that tall lanky body...

[Anonymous No.17191693]

>>17191678
but anon...

[Anonymous No.17191699]

>>17191693
He would look better in low rise, they had shitty fashion sense in those times, and now women have the same shitty fashion trend

[Anonymous No.17191702]

>>17191693
See, old people were the ones who wore high rise, they don't call high rise jeans moms jeans for nothing, and they look stupid

[Anonymous No.17191708]

[Anonymous No.17191722]

>>17191224
Based

[Anonymous No.17191766]

>>17191611
It is. But not in modern trashy way.
Funny how zoomers and feminist try to copy styles from the 80s-90s, but nobody feel the soul of that time.

[Anonymous No.17192408]

>>17190784
always

>>17191541

[Anonymous No.17192412]

>>17191596
high rise is great for men, I only wear high rise pants

[Anonymous No.17192436]

The average high rise wearer

[Anonymous No.17192521]

>>17192436
High rise mog

[Anonymous No.17192616]

>>17191693
Btfo

[Anonymous No.17192634]

>>17188732
>women are more modest

[Anonymous No.17192752]

>>17192521
SO DO I WEAR HIGH RISE OR LOW RISE?

[Anonymous No.17192781]

>>17192752
high

[Anonymous No.17192786]

>>17192781
BUT TELL ME WHY OR SOMETHING ANON

[Anonymous No.17192813]

>>17192786
high rise = longer legs, better silhouette, nicer looking, look thinner
low rise = tiny baby legs, look shorter, long torso

[Anonymous No.17192817]

>>17192752

mid rise

[Anonymous No.17192822]

>>17192813
do this with mid rise now >>17192817

[Anonymous No.17192824]

>>17191611
>>17192412
lmao feminine hips

[Anonymous No.17192841]

>>17191693
child bearing hips

[Anonymous No.17192894]

>>17191660
Perfect cover to move mad packages. No one will suspect a thing. Smart granny. Kid won’t be joining mom & dad in prison.

[Anonymous No.17192912]

>>17192822
Mid looks more balanced.

[Anonymous No.17192920]

>>17191566
>those legs and feet
I've already came twice today

[Anonymous No.17192979]

>>17192824
Cope

[Anonymous No.17192982]

>>17192752
High rise, always

[Anonymous No.17192984]

i want to go back

[Anonymous No.17193015]

>>17192822
mid rise = cant go wrong with it, overall balanced, use this if you dont like the feeling of high rise pants

[Anonymous No.17193224]

>>17192752
Low Rise

[Anonymous No.17193231]

>>17192813
High Rise = Ugly
Low Rise = Sexy

[Anonymous No.17193233]

>>17189405
Nah. You're just a weirdo coomer.

[Anonymous No.17193259]

>>17193231
>>17193224
talk me out of wearing high rise this week

[Anonymous No.17193261]

>>17189389
I do and I am a proud degenerate

[Anonymous No.17193338]

>>17193259
Wear whatever you want, I just honestly believe low rise looks way sexier, but to be honest not everyone has the body for Low Rise, the sad truth

[Anonymous No.17193369]

>>17193233
fag

[Anonymous No.17193852]

>>17193233
Coomers are based

[Anonymous No.17193947]

>>17193259
Are you a dumpy, slack-assed zoomer woman? If yes, pull those granny pants high.

[Anonymous No.17193962]

>what went wrong?
we considered trannycore to be hot in the 2000s

[Anonymous No.17193989]

>>17188732
>wearing trousers

[Anonymous No.17194195]

>>17193962
But yet, trannies didn't wear them back then and they still don't right now. It's not "feminine" enough for them and you can't conceal a dick in tight jeans, especially women tight jeans.

[Anonymous No.17194218]

>>17194195
I'd love to see one try though

[Anonymous No.17194429]

>>17188732
Thank God it did, crop tops look horribly trashy

[Anonymous No.17194498]

>>17188732
>what's the endgame?
Androgyny, and that's a bad thing.

[Anonymous No.17194524]

>>17194498
it is only scary because it's rare
if more people started dressing like david bowie, it would be less frightening to the kids who don't get out much.

[Anonymous No.17194532]

>>17194195
yes you can, you put your balls up in your abdomen and then pull your cock and sack back between your legs and tape it to your lower back with duct tape.
that's how transvestites do it.

it's fun to squeeze their stomachs when their drunk because their so full of piss sometimes they can't hold it and it makes their ass wet and the tape comes loose and they usually get hard.

sometimes i help them along by pissing on them myself.
trannies just want a strong masculine man to treat them like chattel a couple of hours a week and then leave them alone the rest of the time so they can chain smoke and shave their bodies and clean their colons.
you don't need to be there for that.
you should be out chasing other girls and making money and buying gifts for all of them.

[Anonymous No.17194868]

>>17191194
>they took this from you

[Anonymous No.17194958]

>>17188732
Girls got fat. 2001 still looks better in my opinion.

[Anonymous No.17195179]

>>17194958
There was shit loads of fat chicks in 2001, processed foods and obesity was a thing then, it wasn't that long ago in the scheme of things, plenty of girls looked horrible with their fat folds hanging over their low rise jeans.

You people are romanticizing a time when there is a high chance you were not even alive then, i was. The average girl didn't look like paris hilton.

[Anonymous No.17195216]

>>17195179
This.

[Anonymous No.17195609]

>>17194958
This

[Anonymous No.17195666]

[Anonymous No.17196440]

>>17188787
Thin girls better be making a comeback as well.

[Anonymous No.17196693]

>>17190486
You proved my point that nobody’s a classical Marxist. Again, read Gramsci.

[Anonymous No.17196932]

>>17188732
What about mid-rise?

[Anonymous No.17197503]

>>17191536
I'm not, they really don't make women look curvy at all. Whatever curve a girl might have gets hidden by their dorky look. Also if a woman has no curve and wears them it just accentuates the fact that she has no curves. This goes for skinny and fat girls.
>>17191559
Nope I'm a different Anon that just doesn't like high rise jeans :)
>>17191527
>>17191586
Ahhh. I see. -_-

[Anonymous No.17197508]

>>17188732
Midrise master race

[Anonymous No.17197512]

>>17190996
Just go to outside and have a first hand look yourself :)

[Anonymous No.17197522]

>>17191204
Fucking this. I barely register cleavage when looking at girls.

[Anonymous No.17197527]

only attractive women look good in low rise. but if a woman is not attractive, i dont want to see her outside or even perceive her. therefore low rise always wins

[Anonymous No.17197528]

>>17189361
>exposed pussy
Lol just go to the beach for that
>>17189708
Who cares short women are hot anyway :)
>>17189713
What do you expect from >peoples whose brains have been atrophied from years of pornography.

[Anonymous No.17197537]

>>17188732
women got fat.

[Anonymous No.17198882]

>>17189444
>SNL
Szoylent boy discovered

[Anonymous No.17198941]

>>17188732
Low rise caused an epidemic of people with fat in the wrong places, everyone who wore one of those in the 00's now look like a fucking lump
High waist are just better

[Anonymous No.17199017]

>>17188732
It's like a game of pong, the waist line fell and fell until it hit the top of the pussy which it bounced off of and is now rising until it bounces back or covers her entire body

[Anonymous No.17199018]

>>17188732
I think you mean "what went right"

[Anonymous No.17199196]

>>17198941
They got fat because of muh body positivity. They just don't want to go back in shape. High-rise made them lazy.

[Anonymous No.17199206]

>>17199196
Shut the fuck up zoomer, we're talking about the 2000s here, there was no body positivity in the 2000s
Waists got FUCKED because of low rise jeans

[Anonymous No.17199233]

>>17192813
high rise = mike wazowski

[Anonymous No.17199239]

>>17198941
>>17199206
what the fuck are you on about?

[Anonymous No.17199281]

>>17191364
Yeah it's not very healthy for you to have your belly exposed to the cold. Maybe it would be fine if you've done extensive cold exposure training, but how many people do you know personally who have done cold exposure training beyond ending a shower with cold water?

[Anonymous No.17199286]

>>17199206
I'm not a zoomer. I'm just trying to make sense of your stupid post. Are you talking about low-rise jeans causing an epidemic of people with eating disorder because the standards of beauty back then was thin people and girls starved themselves? If so, then yeah well, sucks to be them. Truth is, you had to go to the gym and be fit to fit in low-rise jeans. Britney Spears wasn't rail thin back then nor was Jennifer Lopez. They were fit. If you looked like a lump after the low-rise jeans era, that's on you.
>waists got FUCKED
What the fuck are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.17199293]

>>17191660
Switch the high rise jeans for high rise dress pants, iron the dress shirt, have him smile, and fix his expressionless posture/stance.

[Anonymous No.17199295]

High rise or low rise?
Either one can look great if you're tall and thin.

[Anonymous No.17199297]

>>17188732
low is superior while high is fine as long as the shirt isn't fucking tucked in. or in other words: high is fine as long as I don't know it's high.

[Anonymous No.17199319]

people really hating on milfcore?

[Anonymous No.17199344]

>>17199319
I like milf in jeans like picrel, but I never liked your kind of jeans back then.

[Anonymous No.17199550]

>>17199319
based
>>17199344
cringe

[Anonymous No.17199668]

>>17188904
>denim bourkas.
insha'Allah

[Anonymous No.17199951]

>>17191458
is that a woman or a tranny

[Anonymous No.17199964]

>>17188732
definitely prefer the right. low rise looks like an emaciated holocaust victim

[Anonymous No.17200135]

>>17188736
When your average US adult women was at a healthy weight 30-40 years ago you delusional Gen Z moron. Nobody thinks the fashion industry selling you pants with modified high denim waist wrap for your fat stinkin guts is a grandiose return to the ways of “proper” fashion. Go run a lap, pig.

[Anonymous No.17201011]

>>17200135
what are you typing? your idiot ESL, I said they look better and were always the norm and make them look better

>Nobody thinks the fashion industry selling you pants with modified high denim waist wrap for your fat stinkin guts is a grandiose return to the ways of “proper” fashion. Go run a lap, pig.


I never made this Claim and I am 28 years old. Touch grass

[Anonymous No.17201014]

>>17188809
this. modern womens jeans have to have ample fupa room

[Anonymous No.17201043]

>>17199964
I agree with you
I want to cum on the left
I want to cum in the right

[Anonymous No.17201049]

You guys say high-rise is good because fatties can hide their belly, but isn't the high waist restrictive? Doesn't the waistband pinch on their belly when they sit? How would they be comfortable at all?

[Anonymous No.17201052]

>>17201049
it's not about comfort

[Anonymous No.17201053]

>>17201049
>but isn't the high waist restrictive

no, unless youre some fat slob. High rise if youre in shape you dont notice it. only fatties suffer because they dont want to loose weight

[Anonymous No.17201058]

>>17201011
They don't look better on rectangle-shaped bodies and low-rise pants were a thing in the 70s.

[Anonymous No.17201061]

>>17201058
>They don't look better on rectangle-shaped bodies

yes they do

>>17201058
>low-rise pants were a thing in the 70s.

yes they were but that doesent mean they were the norm, high rise was always the norm until the early 2000s

[Anonymous No.17201067]

>>17201049
the waistband doesnt pinch at all if you're skinny. It feels great desu.

[Anonymous No.17201090]

>>17201053
that would be hell on my balls

[Anonymous No.17201092]

>>17201061
no it wasn't

[Anonymous No.17201096]

>>17201049
do you retards really not go outside, almost every skinny woman i see outside wear high rise

[Anonymous No.17201117]

>>17201090
you dont feel it on your balls because its high rise and it sits where its supposed to be, its not like pulling up low rise

>>17201092
yes it was chud

[Anonymous No.17201121]

>>17201096
no one said only fat women wear high-rise

>>17201117
nah these are too high for my physicality

[Anonymous No.17201122]

>>17201121
>nah these are too high for my physicality

theyre perfect, youve been used to seeing low rise too long

[Anonymous No.17201126]

>>17201122
too high to accommodate

[Anonymous No.17201133]

>>17201126

[Anonymous No.17201143]

>>17201090
you do know there are other pants out there other than skin tight jeans

[Anonymous No.17201354]

>>17199196
This

[Anonymous No.17201358]

>>17199286
Based

[Anonymous No.17201362]

>>17201096
Exactly, that's the problem, they should wear low rise cause it's sexier

[Anonymous No.17201366]

>>17188732
High cut is way hotter, emphasized the curved. Low cut is just skanky and disgusting

[Anonymous No.17201377]

>>17201362
it's not, they literally erase the curves that make women hot lmao

[Anonymous No.17201394]

>>17201377
lol no

[Anonymous No.17201398]

>>17201394
rofl gross

[Anonymous No.17201400]

>>17201398
nicer than a woman wearing yoga pants up to her chest

[Anonymous No.17201402]

hoes figured out they can tuck their guts in and eat what they want, high waist jeans are basically zoomer spanx. ugly chubsters never stood a chance at being effay during low cut era so they tricked their skinny friends into changing the game.

[Anonymous No.17201404]

>>17201402
1. fatties wore low rise in the 2000s like everyone else, stop ignoring it
2. high waisted jeans were the norm before the 2000s when people were skinnier
3. fat people wear high rise =/= high rise looks bad on everyone

[Anonymous No.17201418]

>>17201404
high rise looks bad on everyone

[Anonymous No.17201429]

>>17201404
fatties were shamed and laughed at in the 2000s and they should be again, allowing them to put the problem out of sight and out of mind is a disservice to the general public. I’m fine with muffin tops making a return as long as fat shaming accompanies them.

[Anonymous No.17201433]

>>17201418
>low rise looks bad on everyone
ftfy

[Anonymous No.17201437]

>>17201400
>>17201429
Low cut is made for skinny bitches who got zero ass so they got to show something to compensate.

[Anonymous No.17201438]

>>17201404
This

[Anonymous No.17201447]

>>17201437
fat asses are not attractive and never will be, wide hips and a flat stomach are infinitely more attractive than a fat ass. I fucking hate zoomers.

[Anonymous No.17201460]

>>17201437
low cut is made for chubby goths to show off muffin tops

[Anonymous No.17201464]

>>17201447
im sorry that you homosexual millennials will never understand the true beauty of women. Fat tits and ass go great with wide hips and flat stomachs

[Anonymous No.17201479]

>>17188732
>feminism

[Anonymous No.17201492]

>>17201464
You fucking zoomers are incapable of applying even a slight level of nuance to sex appeal, the only sexual characteristics your coom addled, porn rotted, instant gratification seeking pea brains are able to recognize are absolutely base and animalistic; and it’s for that reason that you are the one who will never understand the true beauty of women. A tight butt, perky tits, flat stomach, wide hips and long slender arms and legs are the absolute peak of lasting feminine elegance. You debase society by drooling over a standard that any slut can achieve by shoving calories down her throat. Enjoy watching your gluttonous, hog of a woman balloon to 175kg over the years, perhaps then you’ll reconsider your infantile retard beliefs on sex appeal.

[Anonymous No.17201507]

>>17201492
>getting this mad
holy fuck gay millennials are pathetic rofl

[Anonymous No.17201513]

>>17201492
>writes an essay
just come out of the closet already

[Anonymous No.17201522]

>>17201507
Why is it that you children resort to “you’re mad”, when anybody disputes what you say rather than justifying your own position? Strong language is part and parcel of anonymous board culture. It does not mean I am upset, it means I am passionate about my beliefs. What I’ve said above is irrefutable. Your desires are base and animalistic and you will never understand the true beauty of women for this reason.

[Anonymous No.17201523]

>>17201522
>>17201492
>mogs your malnourished women

[Anonymous No.17201528]

>>17201522
big tits/ass = sexually developed woman
you writing an essay to prove that its bad is a sight to behold

[Anonymous No.17201529]

>>17201528
This

[Anonymous No.17201533]

>>17201528
Just as I said, base and animalistic.

[Anonymous No.17201539]

>>17201523
Not even a competition.

[Anonymous No.17201542]

>>17201533
so liking beautiful and mature women is animalistic?

[Anonymous No.17201545]

>>17201533
>base
why yes, it is based to like women with fat tits and ass lol

[Anonymous No.17201554]

High rise was the standard through most of history for men. Especially when you tuck your shirt in, high rise will always be best. Low rise with tucked in shirt makes you look extremely top heavy, actually looks like shit. Even if you have wide hips high rise looks better than looking like a deformed Johnny Bravo.

[Anonymous No.17201561]

>>17201554
This

[Anonymous No.17201566]

>>17201542
>>17201545
>so liking beautiful and mature women is animalistic?
That is not at all what I implied. I very clearly stated that wide hips are peak femininity. Carnal desire in relation to primary sexual characteristics is animalistic, basing desire on evolutionarily driven forces is animalistic. It is a low brain oonga boonga mindset that applies no nuance to the characteristics that truly make women elegant and beautiful. When all you’re capable of appreciating are these traits rooted in excess you are incapable of fully appreciating the beauty of women. You are no different than our animalistic ancestors, your taste is banal and unrefined. You might as well be a cave dwelling pleb if you genuinely believe a large ass and tits are the epitome of feminine allure.
>>17201554
Women should not be allowed to wear pants regardless of cut.

[Anonymous No.17201586]

>>17201566
proof for literally anything you said?

[Anonymous No.17201588]

>>17201566
low test = not liking beautiful mature women

[Anonymous No.17201609]

>>17201586
sexual dimorphism
>>17201588
fat =/= mature
pic related
cope, seethe and go watch more Andrew Tate

[Anonymous No.17201612]

>>17201586 #
sexual dimorphism
>>17201588 #
fat =/= mature
pic related
cope, seethe and go watch more Andrew Tate

[Anonymous No.17201614]

>>17201612
who tf is andrew tate

[Anonymous No.17201622]

>>17201612
yea we saw you fuck up your post before deleting it lol

[Anonymous No.17201623]

>>17201612
>go watch more Andrew Tate

[Anonymous No.17201629]

>>17201612
>unironically doesn't like mature women

[Anonymous No.17201630]

>>17201614
Zoomer FOTM pickup artist, grifter, and womanizer.
>>17201622
Congratulations would you like an award?
>>17201623
I’m not advocating to watch him, I’m implying that’s where anon gets his zoomer beliefs on testosterone.

[Anonymous No.17201634]

>>17201629
der ewige coomer

[Anonymous No.17201638]

>>17201612
the words of a low test male, sad sight

[Anonymous No.17201640]

>>17201629
Most people here don't, a 30 year old woman isn't mature, a 50 year old milf is.

>t. milf fucker

[Anonymous No.17201643]

went from a low rise cringe thread to guys actually hating on sexually developed women wtf

[Anonymous No.17201657]

>>17201643
/effay/ has always been a proana board newfriend. I am not hating on sexually developed women, wide hips are the number one indicator of female sexual development and I’ve upheld them as the peak of feminine appeal. Fat tits and ass indicate that a woman will become a lardass hog within a decade and will never be as attractive as a perpetual fashion industry standard figure. /effay/ has truly fallen to the zoomer plague.

[Anonymous No.17201732]

>>17201657
bro the women youve posted on here barely have wide hips

[Anonymous No.17201743]

>>17201732
>bro
I’ve posted three women standing sideways retard. Pic related is
>>17201522
from the front
Have you never seen a woman before?

[Anonymous No.17201765]

this abomination of a thread got derailed so hard by an actual retard retard making essays about tits and ass being bad

[Anonymous No.17201779]

>>17201765
tits and ass are good when tight and perky, fat flabby cellulite bait is bad >>17191603
this is good
>>17199964
>>17201629
this is bad

[Anonymous No.17201792]

>>17201765
the derailing continues

[Anonymous No.17201796]

>>17201792
it’s alright, it’s a shit thread anyway, arguing over low cut and high cut is dumb. women shouldn’t wear pants at all.

[Anonymous No.17201875]

lowcut is better, simple as

[Anonymous No.17201999]

>>17201404
this

[Anonymous No.17202005]

>>17201492
unbelievably based, and great taste.

Long legs, perky butt, flat stomach, decent booba, good face and thick hair and long arms.

great taste friend

[Anonymous No.17202007]

>>17188739
>>17188740
>>17188780
low test detected, woman on left is incapable of breeding

Men also look just as good in higher-waisted pants, especially manlets.

[Anonymous No.17202016]

>>17201875
Low-cut only looks better in the top left example.

[Anonymous No.17202029]

>>17188736
>make everyone look better
so true

[Anonymous No.17202033]

>>17202029
nothing looks good on fatties, high waist makes everyone who isnt an obese blob look normal

[Anonymous No.17202395]

>>17201394
Now I have an erection

[Anonymous No.17202400]

>>17201400
Low rise is definitely hotter

[Anonymous No.17202402]

>>17201433
Hot

[Anonymous No.17202404]

>>17201447
This

[Anonymous No.17202416]

>>17201743
Based taste

[Anonymous No.17202420]

>>17201875
Low cut looks better in all 3 examples

[Anonymous No.17202442]

>>17202420
nope

[Anonymous No.17202443]

>>17202442
The high rise hides her figure and midriff, it looks bad

[Anonymous No.17202453]

[Anonymous No.17202462]

>>17202443
Only 15 year old boys get turned on by shit like that, you have to be 18 to post here.

[Anonymous No.17202480]

>>17188732
low test dicklet detected

[Anonymous No.17202561]

it's one person defending low rise in this thread btw

[Anonymous No.17202595]

>>17202561
yes, it's me

[Anonymous No.17202650]

>>17202561
It's at least two because I'm one of them.

[Anonymous No.17202654]

>>17202561
three

[Anonymous No.17202693]

>>17202443
>The high rise hides her figure

no it doesent it makes her legs look longer and enhances her figure

>midriff

not all outfits show the midriff, most do not. high rise makes it look better you type like a 14 year old

[Anonymous No.17202761]

>>17202561
4

[Anonymous No.17202774]

[Anonymous No.17202821]

>>17191628
WHO ARE YOU?!

[Anonymous No.17202990]

>>17202016
>>17202442
>not liking tummies
shiggy diggy niggy biggy

[Anonymous No.17203095]

>>17188732
>>17188736
>>17188864
>>17188904
>>17190374
>>17190956
>>17191163
>>17191194
>>17191204
>>17191274
>>17191458
>>17191524
>>17191660
>>17191708
>>17192752
Verified Chad with a PhD in Pussy speaking.
Here is the one and only answer:

>High Rise

BUT

>on a body that belongs on a low rise

I HAVE SPOKEN

[Anonymous No.17203134]

>>17202990
I do

[Anonymous No.17203146]

>>17203095
>>on a body that belongs on a low rise

so an ideal womens body? fatties cant compete

[Anonymous No.17203171]

>>17203095
>on a body that belongs on a low rise
so no ass, narrow hips, and thin thighs? dont fall for trannycore, Verified Chad with a PhD in Pussy

[Anonymous No.17203764]

High waist is based. Low rise is for hookers, methheads and white-trash.