2022-05-12: Ghost posting is now globally disabled. 2022: Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!
>buy a hugo boss shirt online (it was on sale for 40 from 100 retail and I never had anything boss before)>arrives fine, check it out up close>no hugo or boss logo visible anywhere>not even a small logo on the side or on the lapel hidden under the buttonsWhat’s the point?It is a perfectly servicable shirt, but I can find noname 10 dollar ones that feel and look the sameIs the point to make your secretary take it off when you are cheating on your wife and see the logo and be impressed? I cant think of any other reason
Designer clothing is a money laundering scheme, nothing more.
Should have gone to Walmart retard
>>17181378people are not impressed by Hugo BossI guess the closest you can find to a "point" in it... is the shirt looking nice... like any other consumer brand.
>>17181393It is kind of a nazi chud brand agreed
>>17181411But I only see chinamen and pakis wear it
>>17181393>people are not impressed by Hugo BossYou are extremely overestimating women
>>17181378Did you buy picrel? If you did anybody who knows their fabrics will know that this is a high quality shirt.If you can make something out of high quality fabrics why slap logos on it?
>>17181413Both of those ethnicities admire the NSDAP for different reasons, I don't think you realise how many Arab incels worship Hitler
>>17181439>Did you buy picrel? Yeah>high quality fabricsIt just feels like any other shirt
>>17181378>>17181439I intentionally buy clothing that doesn't have tacky logos on it since I'd rather not be a walking billboard. I also have a personality and identity to back up my aesthetic choices and don't have to let "BRAND" emblazoned on my clothes do all the work to compensate for it...oh wait I forgot where we were. Sorry you lost, brah.
>>17181455>I intentionally buy clothing that doesn't have tacky logos on it since I'd rather not be a walking billboard. I also have a personality and identity to back up my aesthetic choices and don't have to let "BRAND" emblazoned on my clothes do all the work to compensate for it...Then why not buy a 3-pack on walmart for ten bucks?
>>17181455You're right but sometimes the logo adds to the aesthetic or "personality". Like sporty, preppy, skin. Or those annoying Patagonia kids.
>>17181455Let me guess you also debadge your bmw and call nike “nigger shoes”
>>17181474If I were a meth-nazi wouldn't I be looking for the hugo boss logo?>>17181470>Patagonia kidslol wat? The only kids I've ever seen wearing patagonia are children of narcissitic yuppie assholes who want to look like they have the time to do luxurious outdoors shit when in reality they furthest outdoors they've ever gone is the office parking lot.
>>17181493… you just described patagonia kids, congrats
>>17181494The only ones who brandwhore about it are their parents. The kids just sit their fucking around on their iPads with fortnite/minecraft/zoomershit app of the month.
>>17181494The only ones who brandwhore about it are their parents. The kids just sit there fucking around on their iPads with fortnite/minecraft/zoomershit app of the month. I don't think they could give less of a shit if it's patagucci or walmart.
>>17181470>sometimes the logo adds to the aesthetic or "personality"paying someone else to wear their name like a billboard is the opposite of personality, actually
>>17181548Cope. Brands have a certain look and demographic.
>>17181548>>17181455Why are incels like this?
>>17181447>It just feels like any other shirtCan you see how the pattern isn't printed on but is a differently colored thread that runs through the fabric? This is a specialized pattern that is probably only woven for this kind of shirt.And both the pattern and the colors slap. I love that shirt.>>17181455>I intentionally buy clothing that doesn't have tacky logos on itBased.>>17181556>Cope. Brands have a certain look and demographic.Not that Anon. You can call it cope all you want. I refuse to see someone wearing brand logos as anything else than a person devoid of personality who is desperate for his empty existence to be filled with an artificially created brand identity.
>>17181455>I'm high class because I wear uniqlocringe
>>17181637Gonna check it out when I get home if it’s printed or if you are right
>>17181556>Brands have a certain look and demographic.right. people who want packaged personalities rather than any semblance of individuality or free thinking.
>>17181670>>17181637It really just looks like it’s printed on
>>17182178U r such an individual :)Don't need no brand clothes
>>17181378>>17181439kek hugo boss is mall trash>>17181455lots of poorfags in the replies
>>17182218rec me a good shirt maker
>>17181500I'm baffled by the term "patagucci", it's not that expensive, is that term meant to be ironic?
>>17182424Mercer, Turnbull&Asser, Drakes, Kamakura Vintage, Finamore, Budd
>>17181447You made a mistake. That shirt looks like shit. It also looks poorly made.
>>17181564t. browncel only browncels on this board give a shit about brand logos because you think money will get you the girl that white men get just for being funny.
>>17181447>It just feels like any other shirtIf I'd offer you a 50 bucks cigar to your 600 bucks single malt, I bet my ass on you saying "This cigar that tastes like every cigar goes nicely with that whisky that tastes like every whisky".If you can't tell a Hugo Boss fabric apart from a Walmart fabric, then the former is not for you. Stay within your plebian bounds.
>>17181465>If there is no logo on the high quality fabrics, it means it just feels like a low quality fabric.Your brain on /fa/.
>>17183223>>17183228>typed Chang angrily while his sister was being fucked by a white guy in the other room
>>17183223>>17183228Hugo Boss is walmart tier though, haha good one anon
>>17183218You're clueless if you don't realise brands have different associations.
>>17183261You're just saying random shit while presenting no argument. Did an ai write this?