/fa/ - Fashion

[Anonymous No.17101940]

CASIO Edition

I'm curious what your tastes are, do you own any? Would you buy any?
For your consideration, the GMW-B5000D-1JF


Guides and Info:
> Poorfag guide: https://whothefuckreadsthisshit
> Watch essentials 102: https://someoneelse'sopinion (embed)
> Purchasing used watches: https://tryanopshopyouneet (embed)
> Purchasing straps: https://toofatfortheOEM (embed)
> List of space watches: https://youwillneverbeanastronaut (embed)
> /wt/ Pasta: https://pastebin.com/GBLwAm0f (embed)

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://no.com

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://fullretard.org

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd-time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

[Anonymous No.17101942]

GM5600B-1

[Anonymous No.17101944]

A178WA-1A

[Anonymous No.17101945]

G-5600UE-1DR

[Anonymous No.17101954]

MW600F-2AV

[Anonymous No.17101958]

DW-5600BBM-1JF

[Anonymous No.17101959]

A100WE-1ADF

[Anonymous No.17101960]

For me it's the the A700W

[Anonymous No.17101967]

>>17101960
Love it, is that the stretch band?

[Anonymous No.17101969]

F-91W

[Anonymous No.17101978]

>>17101967
>A100WE-1ADF
Not a stretch band. Some reviews I've read complain that the band pulls on wrist hairs too much, but I have very hairy wrists and it doesn't bother me. And I find the "stacked segment" style of band more aesthetically appealing than this one: >>17101954

>>17101969
Everyone on the planet should own one of these

[Anonymous No.17101985]

>>17101960
Based as fuck
>>17101978
>>17101969
Yeah but there's basically no point to the f91W with the A-700. The a700 is thinner and has a better backlight but is still so cheap it's still a beater.

[Anonymous No.17101991]

>>17101978
I haven't met anyone who has started collecting watches with this, but so many of them go back for it.

[Anonymous No.17101996]

>almost all the same watches
>3 poster count

OH. A schizo.

[Anonymous No.17102004]

>>17101996
Perhaps because I started the thread to hear opinions on Casio watches without outright asking for advice on what I should buy, the watches are simply what I'm looking at.

[Anonymous No.17102017]

A168WEM-1EF

[Anonymous No.17102020]

A168WEGG-1BEF

[Anonymous No.17102024]

>>17102004
Then maybe post a range? Because casio has a range. They are almost all the same type with little differences.

[Anonymous No.17102025]

>>17102024
I'm not really sure, that's why I just started posting. I'm happy to see any and all Casio's. I'm just posting what I have found I like.

[Anonymous No.17102030]

AE-1200WHD-1AVEF

[Anonymous No.17102039]

A500WA-7DF

[Anonymous No.17102046]

[Anonymous No.17102049]

>>17102046
B650WD-1A

That's all I have so far.

[Anonymous No.17102070]

>>17101985
Yeah the A700 is superior to the F91W in every way and I wear it like 90% of the time, but the F91W is still half the price and perfect for working out or any other situation where it's gonna be treated roughly. And it's the original iconic design. Why not get both?

Also does anyone have or tried on the A1000RBW-1? I love the iridescent band, but $180 seems insane to pay for it

[Anonymous No.17102248]

>>17102070

Saw it in a jeweler window not long ago and it looked pretty good, not sure if it's all the LED lighting though as video unboxings aren't that good. Not sure if it helps but I have something metal that's coated in the same iridescent way and fingerprints are a problem, I'd imagine that being in contact with skin and hair for a period of time would require cleaning each time.

[Anonymous No.17102430]

>>17101940
Own three, in order of acquisition: Tron, DW5600LS-2 & picrel. Happy and content, never buying another watch again.

[Anonymous No.17102443]

*mogs this entire thread*

[Anonymous No.17102445]

[Anonymous No.17102449]

been wearing the A1000D since it came out in 2020.
love it so much.
im really happy they made it, because I have been waiting for something like it for years.
Finally we the classic casio look, simplified and a bit more premium in full stainless steel.
Not perfect, but it's not bad either.
When it came out I was about to crack and buy some meme for a square digital metal watch. Thank god it came out.

[Anonymous No.17102458]

>>17102449
here is a random pic from google.
don't be afraid of the white mother of peral backdrop, it's not very rainbow-ish, most of the time it's just white unless in direct sunlight.
This watch is great

[Anonymous No.17102699]

Best mix between retro looks and a dash of colour.

[Anonymous No.17102827]

>>17102039
>full display area utilization, no waste, all function, logical layout
>cohesive monochrome aesthetic, silver bezel with gray lcd frame instead of black
looks excellent, must be a fluke

[Anonymous No.17103005]

I own this little thing.

[Anonymous No.17103018]

>>17101940
This big nigga here. Wanted a GWG 1000 but it might be a bit too big for my wrist.

[Anonymous No.17103020]

>>17103018
Shit forgot pic related.

[Anonymous No.17103051]

>>17101940
>do you own any?
Yeah, boy. picrel

>Would you buy any?
I like the GST-S300G-1A1 but will wait for a good deal as I don't like the price.

[Anonymous No.17103059]

>>17103051
>have cool collection
>put it in some plastic tupperware shit
why not get a proper watch box bro?

[Anonymous No.17103065]

>>17103059
Because I move it around to charge the solar ones.

[Anonymous No.17103068]

>>17101985
I wear an F-91W for work every day because it can get the shit beaten out of it very easily

[Anonymous No.17103076]

>>17103065
But a watch box usually has a glass lid, so...? Mine get charged just fine.

[Anonymous No.17103094]

>>17103076
How many watches does it hold?
Maybe I'll get one someday, if I get a serious jewelry watch. For now, a plastic box for plastic watch seems fine.

[Anonymous No.17103114]

>>17103094
I mean they have some for up to 20, 30 watches or something..

https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B00L29YVK8/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_image_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Some cheapo ones like this are worth it I'd say.

[Anonymous No.17103148]

Dw5600bb best looking gshock

[Anonymous No.17103170]

>>17103051
is the gd350 negative display really more legible than the other negative displays

[Anonymous No.17103215]

>>17103170
Yes, bigtime. I wish they'd use it for all their negative displays.

[Anonymous No.17103455]

Can I get a QRD on the different Casioaks. apparently there's three or so types?

[Anonymous No.17103467]

Kikou Ibe seems appropriate here

[Anonymous No.17103480]

I this watch general?

Looking for best looking digital gold watch thats comfortable wearing

[Anonymous No.17103483]

>>17102030
I have this one. Never worn it as WFH since COVID and have not been out and needed a watch.

[Anonymous No.17103486]

>>17102699
I've seen this a lot on eBay but apparently there are lots of fakes ,which is weird for a £10 watch.

[Anonymous No.17103516]

>>17102070
>Why not get both?
because i don't want 1000 shitters. There's no time I'd want an f91w instead of an A700, or, for exercise, an ironman or a gshock.

I'm not some reddit tier "collector" who thinks a shelf of trash is something to be applauded. I want watches I'll want to wear with regularity

[Anonymous No.17103517]

>>17102458
they made a new one with a stainless steel face

[Anonymous No.17103550]

simple as

[Anonymous No.17103575]

>>17103480
Seconded. Nice classy "gold" digital watch, does it even exist? If it did it'd be from Casio.

[Anonymous No.17103591]

>>17103575
>>17103480

There are more

[Anonymous No.17103593]

>>17103591
>>17103575
>>17103480

[Anonymous No.17103873]

>>17101960
you know, I've been really wanting to start wearing watches again. This looks great. Cheap enough that I don't worry about it while it still looks good

[Anonymous No.17104062]

>>17102443
>>17102445
What feels worse? That you had to come to a Casio-only thread to try to brag about that piece of shit, or knowing that you failed?

[Anonymous No.17104065]

>>17102449
>>17102458
The white looks good, there are some vintage looks that don't work but that isn't one.

>>17102699
That's what I'm set to buy thanks to this thread, thank you.

>>17102017
>>17102020
Were my runner-ups but something about the inverted dials is too far from the original.

[Anonymous No.17104066]

>>17101940
Guys what do you think about this watch? I really like gold and tend not to go for gaudy pieces, but this looked too cool to me since I like the Greek/Roman Aesthetic and history.

I wear 24k gold jewelry

[Anonymous No.17104068]

>>17104066

[Anonymous No.17104072]

Oh a casio thread

[Anonymous No.17104076]

>>17103480
>>17103575
A158WETG-9AEF

I'll post what I have.

[Anonymous No.17104077]

>>17103480
>>17103575
A1000MG-9EF

[Anonymous No.17104079]

>>17103480
>>17103575
A168WEGB-1BEF

[Anonymous No.17104081]

>>17104066
>>17104068
If you like it, buy it. Try a /wt/ general thread.

[Anonymous No.17104092]

>>17103480
>>17103575
A100WEG-9AEF

[Anonymous No.17104094]

>>17103480
>>17103575
AQ-230GA-9DMQYES

>>17104072
Knows what's up.

[Anonymous No.17104095]

>>17103480
>>17103575
A171WEG-9AEF

[Anonymous No.17104097]

>>17103480
>>17103575
A171WEMG-9AEF

[Anonymous No.17104187]

>>17104081
thank you knowledgeable/friendly anon

[Anonymous No.17104202]

>>17102070
7 years on CR2016 vs 3 years on CR1616
i will never buy a 3 year approx batt life watch again especially not a large one

[Anonymous No.17104236]

>>17104066
Gaudy.

[Anonymous No.17104266]

Marlin Diver and Tough Solar, although MD needs a battery change. Otherwise it is way tougher that I'd expect for a watch with a glass face. Tough Solar is indestructible, I take it hunting all the time

[Anonymous No.17104296]

What do anons think of the Casio DW-1000?

[Anonymous No.17104455]

is leo wearing a womens watch in this movie?

[Anonymous No.17104461]

do I get it in silver or gold? both colours wear easily apparently

[Anonymous No.17104479]

>>17102024
based as fuck

[Anonymous No.17104502]

>>17104455
what would make it a watch for women instead of men does it have a menstruation tracker lol

[Anonymous No.17104554]

>>17104461
depends on your skin tone

[Anonymous No.17104563]

[Anonymous No.17104572]

>>17102430
I just want the basic square gshock with tough solar without any of the shit designs like the red square on the GWM5610 and not having to pay over hundred bucks for it

[Anonymous No.17104575]

>>17103020
model?

[Anonymous No.17104584]

>>17104554
im a quirked up whiteboy

[Anonymous No.17104585]

>>17104572
yeah same
also in gray

[Anonymous No.17104587]

>>17104266
model of the tough solar?

[Anonymous No.17104599]

>>17104563
My late father had a similar Seiko with a golden clock face.

[Anonymous No.17104622]

>>17103005
can I get an ID on this? Also, any resource to learn about all the F91-W adjacent Casios made of black resin? I remember seeing another black resin Casio posted on /wt/ that was like the F91-W but slightly smaller and JDM, but I forgot the reference number

[Anonymous No.17104794]

>>17104575
GW9400-1

[Anonymous No.17105014]

>>17104622
It's W-59-1VQES, fren.

[Anonymous No.17105207]

>>17104461
I have silver and like it a lot. Gold is louder, but it's obviously in good fun. I'd want to see the gold tone in person as that can vary a bit from watch to watch

[Anonymous No.17105272]

>>17104563
replaced to bracelet

[Anonymous No.17105323]

>>17103068
I used to have one of these but I tried to modify it and ended up fucking it up and making it look ugly as sin.

[Anonymous No.17105324]

>>17105014
thanks fren

[Anonymous No.17105362]

ELECTRO LUMINESCENCE

[Anonymous No.17105398]

We need some more master of G series watches

[Anonymous No.17105403]

>>17103550
The subtleness of it......so exquisite

[Anonymous No.17105407]

>>17103051
Based watchbox

[Anonymous No.17105450]

>>17103005
how's this compare to the F-91W?

[Anonymous No.17105532]

>>17105450
Not than anon, imo for what it is and what it's good for you really can't beat the f91w

[Anonymous No.17105793]

>>17104502
The size, ngl.

[Anonymous No.17105812]

>>17103480
>Is this watch general?
There is no watch general anymore.

[Anonymous No.17105839]

>>17101954
BEST WATCH
GIRLS DIG IT
and it has lugs which make it less gay than this >>17101960

>>17102030
this one is fat and ugly. only kids wear this

>>17102443
>>17102445
yeah this is actually very cool but overly expensive
and i wouldn't even wear it if i had one, because it looks so fragile

also casio has made one too, see pic related

>>17102458
stop triggering me with pictures of retarded people putting their watches on their articulations

>>17102699
>no lugs

>>17103005
i had this when i was a kid, but iirc the buttons were red plastic
i bought it again, it beats the f91w because the water resistance is indisputably better.)))

>>17103051
really dislike your collection m8 but props for having pronounced taste at least

>>17103068
it's... backwards? did you reattach the strap the other way around on purpose?

[Anonymous No.17105845]

>>17105839
why did you not reply to any of my posts, you fuckin incel?

[Anonymous No.17105940]

>>17105839
many ppl have wrist shapes that don't allow for the watch to remain secure above the articulation without being too tight and therefore would be better off wearing big fat squares rather than medium circles
upside down straps is traditional for japanese dress watches for a cleaner look from the outside perspective and in many cases it corrects the problem of the case tending to shift and angle away from the wearer

[Anonymous No.17105955]

Need to get a battery for the gshock. Lasted ten years at least.

[Anonymous No.17105962]

why is half the catalog always watch threads
nigga let a thread die before making a new one

[Anonymous No.17105968]

>>17105962
one is basically dead, then there's this one that is for some reason casio shit only and then there's the one with the ugly fag

[Anonymous No.17105975]

fuck /wt/

[Anonymous No.17106095]

>>17105839
model of the middle Casio? looks good

[Anonymous No.17106127]

the most comfy thread on /fa/, no over priced mountain jew brands that made in china cancerous shills

[Anonymous No.17106149]

[Anonymous No.17106187]

>>17101940
Greetings

[Anonymous No.17106192]

>>17106187
I also have this one, from 1988 (it was my dad's). Wouldn't mind an ana-digi tho

[Anonymous No.17106201]

>>17105398
Which Gulfmaster is this? Doesn't look too oversized

[Anonymous No.17106218]

>>17106187
nice, model?
>>17106192
pretty cool too, whats the top middle display for?

[Anonymous No.17106231]

>>17106218
w-s210h-1aveg

Top middle display shows seconds going, it's full at 60 and empty when a minute is passed. Quite cool

[Anonymous No.17106248]

>>17106231
the tough solar one is pretty kino and good price, are the screws real? its look like a mini gshock and I actually thought at first that it is a gshock, I wonder why its so unknown watch because I just found out about it and might purchase it.

[Anonymous No.17106390]

>>17106127
Yea, fuck you too.
>already posted the shitters so eat my ass faggot

[Anonymous No.17106400]

>>17104461
both, obviously

[Anonymous No.17106534]

>>17101940
this has grown on me

[Anonymous No.17106569]

Currently using an AE-1200WH but I just purchased the GA-2110 and it arrives tomorrow. The newer model seems a bit too bloated with features but I do wish there was a middle ground that brought back the Tough Solar to the OG Casioaks

[Anonymous No.17106597]

>>17103455
I’m >>17106569

Having spent a good few hours yesterday watching and reading different reviews on the different models I ended up going with the OG Casioak over the new B2100 models. The newest ones on the market come with Bluetooth to sync with your phone but I can’t be fucked to instal an app on my phone (especially a Japanese app). They also come with a solar panel that will passively charge the battery due to it needing way more power to use the BT functions like auto-adjusting the time and relaying your phone notifications.

The dial on the left has changed from showing the days of the week like on the OG models to now indicating what mode the watch is in (which I find pointless, personally)

Colour options are also super limited on the newer version (pic related) so you’ll have to wait a few months/years for other variations to come out like white or grey or skeleton clear.

[Anonymous No.17106604]

>>17106597
Wish they'd just added solar and multiband and kept the rest the same to be honest.

[Anonymous No.17106618]

I really like my Casio’s, this is my most expensive one at $600, I wear it a lot.

[Anonymous No.17106632]

>>17101940
OP is the only good Casio you can buy.
>Don't even try to counterargument me

[Anonymous No.17106684]

>>17106534
You're gay now? Or a raver? Or both? A gaver?

[Anonymous No.17106693]

>>17106684
Nah just gay (bi)

[Anonymous No.17106792]

>>17101940
just bought this, r8 my purchase

[Anonymous No.17106799]

>>17106618
Jesus, you can get an Oceanus or something for that kind of money.

[Anonymous No.17106816]

lemme get a id?

[Anonymous No.17106850]

>>17106597
Do you know whether the new version supports ddmm date format? Deal breaker for me if not

[Anonymous No.17106923]

>>17106850
It does

[Anonymous No.17106925]

Salud mi familia

[Anonymous No.17106955]

>>17106923
Cheers

[Anonymous No.17106979]

I forgot to set my dive bezel on my watch and ruined a pot of ramen for the first time in my entire life

[Anonymous No.17107002]

>>17106925
Please post more pics of the Presage

[Anonymous No.17107093]

>>17106979
just add an egg

[Anonymous No.17107106]

>>17106248
I'm quite sure they are, yes.
Yeah it's basically a G-shock "lite", lots of functions, lightweight and awesome backlight. It's also quite cheap, I paid it ~40€, and here in Europe Casios are more expensive than rest of the world usually
I really dunno why it isn't more known

[Anonymous No.17107113]

>>17106925
I second this >>17107002
That's a great looking watch

[Anonymous No.17107124]

>>17107002

[Anonymous No.17107166]

people put these clear films on their cars to avoid scratches on paint, do people put any type of protective film on their watches face to avoid scratches?

[Anonymous No.17107186]

>>17107093
I did, I beat an egg, and that's how I ruined it. There wasn't enough water and the egg didn't cook enough before I took it off, because it was burning at the bottom. I would have gotten sick eating it, so I threw it in the trash and put another pot on.

[Anonymous No.17107197]

>>17107166
No I’m not a feg leik u lol

[Anonymous No.17107240]

>>17107197
>No I’m not a feg leik u lol
you sure type like one

[Anonymous No.17107258]

>>17107240
Say that to my face and see what happens

[Anonymous No.17107285]

>>17107166
you could try a clear wax

[Anonymous No.17107568]

thoughts on this?

[Anonymous No.17107578]

>>17107568
F91w looks better

[Anonymous No.17107580]

Can't stop looking at it bros. She's a beauty

[Anonymous No.17107851]

[Anonymous No.17107912]

>>17107580
mid

[Anonymous No.17108356]

r8, h8, dial8

[Anonymous No.17108364]

>>17106816
looks like a typical North American nigger

[Anonymous No.17108411]

>>17108356
What's the story about a crack on metal ones?

[Anonymous No.17108429]

>>17108411
this? I'm a helicopter mechanic and I'm just hard on shit

[Anonymous No.17108432]

>>17108411
this was my work watch for about 6 months and I got welding slag on it and most of the "gold" is scuffed off the case already

[Anonymous No.17108651]

>>17107002
>>17107113
Here you go guys. Unfortunately I'm not a great photographer

[Anonymous No.17108668]

Leather strap on a Casio Edifice
Y/N?

[Anonymous No.17108673]

>>17108668
the steel bracelet is better

[Anonymous No.17108766]

>>17108364
Don’t disrespect chugs you stupid cumskin parasite. Watch is kinda gaudy though.

[Anonymous No.17108799]

>>17108766
lmao seethe

[Anonymous No.17108976]

>>17108651
These are gorgeous but I wish they made them 36-38mm instead

[Anonymous No.17109310]

While this thing is monstrous and ugly I can't help but fucking love it.

Literally got lost in the forest last night tripping on shrooms and the compass got me home

[Anonymous No.17109361]

>>17108976
don't they? there are several labeled for women

[Anonymous No.17109364]

>>17101944
love this little nigga
been wearing one for 7+ years

[Anonymous No.17109373]

>>17108651
Lord do I love the Presage series watches. I'm especially fond of the "cocktail time" series.

Here's my favorite: The "Manhattan".
>Iridescent brown face on a rose gold case.
hnnnng

[Anonymous No.17109815]

>>17109310
Ive been considering getting one but ended up getting the Rangeman. One third of the price, same features, more info on display at the same time... but the Mudmaster still calls to me.

[Anonymous No.17109828]

>>17108651
Looks fucking great. I would love to own this watch

[Anonymous No.17110054]

>>17109373
That's got a real old world class kind of charm to it. Wouldn't look out of place at a 20's cocktail party.

[Anonymous No.17110151]

>>17108976
I know what you mean, but I'm actually ok with having more dial on this one.
>>17109361
34mm which would be good for a bi stage look. 17mm lug width tho which is pain in the ass
>>17109373
Very nice
>>17109828
Do it, love mine. Looks better in person than in photos, which you cant say for every watch. I think they go on sale regularly. I've seen them at the bay (canada) fir 40% off or $300 cad during bay days at what not. I'm sure Macy's or whatever is the same in the states.

[Anonymous No.17110255]

>>17110151
*vintage look fuck

[Jane Doe No.17110261]

I have a red one of those. To be honest I'd prefer a watch that doesn't have a battery. I never wear it.

[Anonymous No.17110323]

>>17110261
>Get a solar
>Put it not in a drawer
>Always charged with indoor light
>You'll come up with a reason to refute this because you like the shiny

[Anonymous No.17110326]

>>17110261
>Wants to buy a watch
>Never intends to wear the watch
Do you really want a watch?

[Anonymous No.17110585]

>>17109815
It's weird how rugged and yet nice this thing can look all at once. I have 7.5 inch wrists and I don't think I'd rock it if they were any smaller

[Anonymous No.17111068]

>>17105839
>that round brilliant cut crystal
Model/crystal source?

>>17106187
Greetings, love that amber LED. Where'd you pick that up from?

>>17106792
Not bad for a Casio thread. Band is a little too clean, I actually think it'll look more attractive the more you wear it in.

>>17106925
¡Bienvenido! The Casio is classic but that Seiko is just beautiful.

>>17107124
Kek, genuinely love all of those, just one suggestion, if you crop your picture a little more on the bottom and sides you will keep the classy photo without revealing you took it on the toilet.

>>17107580
Absolutely lovely, do you keep your new purchases on your desk like me?

>>17108668
Depends on the lugs really, is that 24mm? If so it's a large size but not uncommon. Personally I think it'd look nice with a leather strap, maybe dark blue to match the dial?

>>17109373
>>17110054
Said it best, gorgeous looking watch. Stands out from every other gold, white/black dial dress watch.

[Anonymous No.17111073]

>>17107124

[Anonymous No.17111878]

>>17110585
I gave in and bought a GWG-2000-1A3ER. It will arrive this week. I don't know my wrist size, I use the 4th from last hole in the GW-9400, so not very thick at all. It will look enormous on me I'm sure. I don't care I will love it.

[Anonymous No.17111912]

>>17106534
It's interesting and cool but from photos and videos it looks like the LCD will be a pain to see. I hope it's better in real life. They basically put a polarizer on the crystal.

[Anonymous No.17112196]

Got a ga900

[Anonymous No.17112964]

>>17111878
Fuck yeah. Doesn't look half as huge as I thought it would. This thing is gorgeous.

[Anonymous No.17113266]

>>17101945
have one of these. main watch. excellent.

[Anonymous No.17113767]

>>17112964
Holy fuck you could eat dinner off of that thing lmao how big did you think it would be?

[Anonymous No.17114564]

>>17112964
kek thats massive, i love it. pic with the band showing?

[Anonymous No.17115565]

>>17109815
I have the mudman, and I love it. Been looking at other G shocks, but I just don't feel it with other models.

[Anonymous No.17115571]

>>17112964

[Anonymous No.17116153]

What's the cheapest gshock with interval timer? I got the ae1300 but want something more substantial.

[Anonymous No.17116224]

ARAGGGGH I wanted POOOOOOOCCCCHHH

[Anonymous No.17116263]

>>17113767
>>17114564
>>17115571
After a couple days: honestly thinking of sending it back. Even though it looks great and feels very premium, I keep wanting to just wear my GW-9400. Adjustments with the crown on the GWG-2000 are a fucking bitch compared to using buttons. And the lack of sunrise and sunset, proper city and latitude/longitude settings, which are present on the Rangeman, is annoying.
The fact that the Rangeman cost me 240 eurones, while the Mudmaster cost 640 while offering less features, is bothering me.

[Anonymous No.17116948]

>>17116263
thanks for the review/comparison
but why did you only realize such things after wearing it

[Anonymous No.17117322]

>>17116948
I already knew them of course, but I figured I could get over them due to being so drawn to the Mudmaster. Turns out I couldn't, sent it back today. Also the crown felt much flimsier than I expected it to.

Now I'm eagerly awaiting whatever Casio will come up with for the 40th anniversary next year. If it's like the 35th, we should have some new Master of G models around Sept or so.

[Anonymous No.17117704]

>>17117322
Fair call, sometimes you have to wear a watch and see it on you to know. Pity mall watches are so overpriced and homogeneous.

[Anonymous No.17117819]

>>17117704
yep and just now i realized the gd400 is not for me after wearing it for a few days
the bull bar is pretty much its only defining feature and it presses into my skin too much and leaves an indentation, the case is not small and the module is very basic yet it is 3 year battery and the lack of date alarm is really silly imo (to be fair that seems to be most casio digital watches if i'm not mistaken)
would look dumb next to my g2900 from 2002 with its smaller case, 10 year battery, date alarm, e-data, etc if its resin hadn't rotted apart even while sitting inside my drawer unused for several years

[Anonymous No.17117837]

My watch is nicer than your watch

[Anonymous No.17117868]

I got this a while ago, I love it

[Anonymous No.17118061]

Anyone else excited for this shit? I read rumours there will be a new Rangeman coming soon. Can't wait.

>>17117837
>comes into a Casio thread to post his shitter
Whatever fag here's your pity (You), now fuck off back to your hole.

>>17117704
Absolutely. In the end it cost me 3 euros (GLS shipping back to seller) to try on a watch I couldn't stop thinking about. Totally worth it.

[Anonymous No.17118154]

So now that Abe is dead, what does this mean for Seiko, Minase, etc.

[Anonymous No.17118762]

>>17104584
You can be white and have lighter or darker tone.
Eg. I'm yellow-greenish (med genetics with northern Norway).

[Anonymous No.17118783]

>>17101969
Copped this recently. Very exciting piece that makes me enthusiastic about wearing it. There's just something that works with this watch and it's cheap enough to not be afraid of using it.
>>17101960
This looks nice and I've considered but how's the light and does it catch your wrist hairs? I'm not super hairy but…

I've owned:
• A164WA-1VES
• A159WGEA-1EF

I'm owning:
• F-91W-1YEG
• F-105W-1AWYEF (Ordered online the other day)

Considering:
A168WA-1YES
A700WE-1AEF

Does anyone know which of the watches that have the same style that I posted, from Casio, made with resin that do have a different color on the backlight?
The F-91W light obviously isn't impressive (hence my F105 purchase for variation).
I'm talking default factory being alternate colored (not Etsy modded stuff).

>>17102020
I like this one too. As a designer however I can tell you that inverted color schemes just create eyestrain. Even the screen on the F-91W is superior to the A700.

[Anonymous No.17118790]

>>17108651
you may not be the best at taking pics, but pairing that with a brown suede would suggest you have great taste

[Anonymous No.17118964]

>>17101960
Ive had this one for a bit now, love it. It's small though so only wear it if you have dainty wrists.

[Anonymous No.17119409]

>>17118783
Try https://sitesearch.casio.jp/a_intl_en/search.x
>Electro-luminescent

You're right about the inverted color but with electro-luminescence I prefer it to the standard. Pic related, inverted v normal LCD panel.

[Anonymous No.17119466]

>>17119409
i don't know anything about design, but i know what i like

... and that does look pretty cool

might be worth a bit of eye-strain in the day for that sci-fi glow at night

[Anonymous No.17119485]

>>17119466
But did you find a Casio you liked? Post pic.

[Anonymous No.17119508]

>>17119485
hey listen man, i'm not saying this to get at you right, but i thought it was pretty obvious from me saying 'i don't know anything about design' that i'm not the designer-anon in search of a casio

now yeah, maybe it was rude of me to interrupt your conversation and thereby cause the confusion, but i'm just really tired of saying 'not him' any time someone posts a cool pic and i feel a need to respond to it
maybe the fault lies with me completely, in that i sometimes get a bit carried away when i see something rad, but man... do i really need to spell it out every time that i'm someone else ?

ah y'know what, disregard everything i just said: here's an old pic of my w-86
i ain't mad at you, just irritated that i have to prefix everything with a disclaimer when i'm very tired and don't wanna

[Anonymous No.17119565]

>>17119508

>>17118783
>As a designer however

>>17119466
>i don't know anything about design

My bad but I'm not fussed.

[Anonymous No.17119566]

>>17119565
>My bad but I'm not fussed.

cheers, but the fault is all mine: i'm just drunk on my own exhaustion and then had a dumb rant

[Anonymous No.17119774]

Next up should be the Ranger edition. I hate it and I want everyone to know how shit is this latest release.

[Anonymous No.17119795]

rec me a wedding watch. something slightly beyond my f91w and my mdv106a (duro).

hard mode: something I will wear for years.

[Anonymous No.17119796]

>>17119774

I always thought the Tudor snowflake hands were the ugliest thing I have ever seen, until today when I saw their new buttplug hand. What on earth is the design team smoking?

[Anonymous No.17119812]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmgZ8VMLRnk&ab_channel=WIRED
>tag heuer brand ambassador
>still wears a rolex
it's literally over for any other brand forever

[Anonymous No.17119820]

>>17119774
they really fucked up making it 39mm

[Anonymous No.17119830]

i collect timex

[Anonymous No.17119840]

>>17102030
Had one of these. Couldn't keep the lug in the cheap plastic case.

[Anonymous No.17119842]

>>17119830
I have two of the Marlin Nasa collab watches. They're actually really nice

[Anonymous No.17119886]

>>17101940
I guess I will buy a gshock then

[Anonymous No.17119905]

I have two watches that need new batteries, should I have a watch shop replace with their batteries or should I buy "quality" batteries online?

[Anonymous No.17119910]

>>17119905
Just do it yourself. The only watches worth taking to a watch shop for a battery replacement are really old electric watches with fragile battery contacts like hamiltons and bulovas and shit. They're just gonna throw a cheap energizer in there anyways.

[Anonymous No.17119912]

I want an all-white G-Shock, but can't make up my mind.
Any recommendations that might help me make a decision?

[Anonymous No.17119914]

I daily this. It was late dad's. Took me an embarrassingly long time to figure out that the hands aren't cut like white arrows but are just painted that way.

[Anonymous No.17119917]

>>17119914
Nice watch anon. Sorry about your dad.

[Anonymous No.17119928]

>>17119917
Thanks. He was a big watch guy and I didn't care at all while he was alive. In a way it feels bad because we'd have much more to talk about, but in another I feel closer to him learning about watches. Enough with the blog.

>>17102699
Want to get this but it's sold out everywhere I look. Must be because of the Teddy Baldasare video.

[Anonymous No.17119943]

>>17119910
>They're just gonna throw a cheap energizer in there anyways
What's a good battery?

[Anonymous No.17119961]

>>17119943
energizer

[Anonymous No.17120000]

Thoughts on this?
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/334451661134

[Anonymous No.17120003]

What a shit taste you faggots have...

[Anonymous No.17120014]

>>17119409
Hi yeah I did some deeper diving. The gold Illuminator is actually cool. Speaking of diving, I'm now considering a Duro. I'll have to try it on my wrist though.

The industrial standard of screens before windows changed the name of the game was black background w/ white characters (see unix terminals).
I noticed that the screen on the f91 is definitely clearer and I think it has to do with the lack of EL. EL seems to compromise default visibility. With that, I think that the net value, most of the time, is actually forgoing the EL and going with the trashy LED because you're not going to use the light that much honestly. Maybe it depends on your line of work. I'll be able to assess fully when I get the f105.

Back to inverted schemes, the reason why white letters on black background -can- be tiring also (if contract and clarity is not in place), is that visually, white color expands, this gives the impression that characters are "leaking" for lack of a better expression. The "leaking" of white characters can be somewhat mitigated by thickness to give the characters a bit more typographic "body" as it were.

Fun fact: if you read characters that are slightly more towards gray instead of black on a white background (thus lower character-to-background contrast) you will actually retain that information better because it forces you to concentrate.
With looking at the time however, we don't care about that and want as clear as possible because we're mostly going to just glance at the watch real quick.

[Anonymous No.17120072]

>>17119886
do it, but not through myer they seem overpriced as shit

>>17102699
>>17119928
https://www.chrono24.com/casio/casio-general-a168wa-1wdf-unisexs-watch--id19551353.htm

>>17119943
>>17119961
kek, but Maxell

>>17120000
looks nice and clean, how do you think it'd cope getting worn in though?

>>17120014
fascinating, i think i'm going to purchase an inverted EL now, ty

[Anonymous No.17120105]

>>17120000
Good question. Probably not an every-day watch I guess.

[Anonymous No.17120106]

>>17120105
meant for
>>17120000 (You)
looks nice and clean, how do you think it'd cope getting worn in though?
>>17120072

[Anonymous No.17120203]

???

[Anonymous No.17120224]

>>17119795
Tissot's 'Le Locle' range is marketed as having a view to marriage, offering the same watch design for both parties tying the knot

some of them are pretty nice, too: quality pieces with a bit of panache to mark the occasion and to wear fondly in later years


t. guy who thinks tissot should be paying him for this copy, but genuinely thinks the watches are worth a look

[Anonymous No.17120229]

>>17119914
>Took me an embarrassingly long time to figure out that the hands aren't cut like white arrows but are just painted that way.

i love it when that kinda thing happens, so having that sense of epiphany connected to someone who passed is nothing to be ashamed about
if anything, it adds to the memory of him, still surprising you years later

very happy that you have something so special, bro

[Anonymous No.17120256]

>>17120105
>>17120106
i think it'd look nice in a casual-but-neat dress sense, not my thing but doesn't really matter what anyone else thinks though

if you're asking for an unbias opinion though
>matte white might be harder to clean than shiny/metallic but not very
>quick-release spring bars
>20bar WR isn't bad
>carbon-resin case is pretty based
>dial is clean but detailed
>ultimate panda
>inverted display refer to >>17119409 and >>17120014
>standard CASIO accoutrements, world time, stop watch, alarms, timer etc.
>day-dial
>it is an LED at 4:30 but somewhat decent, seems to work well on the inverted dial
>nice big lume on hands

pic related

[Anonymous No.17120264]

>>17120256
Appreciate the response.
Am going on holiday in a few months, was just after something a little dressy but not that flash for the evenings.
I think this might be it.

[Anonymous No.17120285]

>>17120264
sounds like a perfect edition then, the price is good too

not sure if you know there's a 'Frozen Forest' version, might not dirty as quickly?

[Anonymous No.17120297]

>great now i've gone down a panda Casio rabbit hole
CASIO DW-6900NB-7

[Anonymous No.17120300]

>>17120297
CASIO GA-700-7A

[Anonymous No.17120303]

>>17120300
CASIO GA-2200GC-7A

[Anonymous No.17120309]

>>17120303
CASIO GAX-100B-7A

[Anonymous No.17120311]

>>17120309
CASIO GBA-900-7A

[Anonymous No.17120315]

>>17120311
CASIO GBD-200UU-9

[Anonymous No.17120320]

how about inverted only during el

[Anonymous No.17120325]

>>17120320
i need this

[Anonymous No.17120343]

>>17120325
if you mean the watch model in particular, i should note that its design is retarded and should have been the 1382 in the first place

[Anonymous No.17120368]

>>17120320
>when your company is so bad you have to rip off CASIO

there are models that have inverted EL
>>17102020
>>17104079
>>17119409
thats just from this thread
https://sitesearch.casio.jp/a_intl_en/search.x
>Electro-luminescent

[Anonymous No.17120387]

>>17120368
you misread
the ripoff watch has a positive display but inverts it to negative for the duration of el mode

[Anonymous No.17120638]

>>17120229
Thanks, man. At first I really didn't understand the fandom behind g-shocks, and when my dad got this one I thought it was kind of lame at first. It's definitely my favorite watch now. You're right, personal history enhances the appeal.

[Anonymous No.17120694]

>>17120638
>At first
>at first
Brainfart.

[Anonymous No.17120917]

>>17101940
dude a 168s MHHHMH
fuck yeah

[Anonymous No.17120995]

>>17118783
>Even the screen on the F-91W is superior to the A700

No, a700 is better

[Anonymous No.17121033]

>>17120917
that's a lovely mottling across the case indicative of a watch that's been worn constantly
i'm surprised by the bronze appearance of that revealed layer

[Anonymous No.17121122]

>>17120297
>CASIO GBD-200UU-9
Thanks mate - looking at each of these will keep me busy today

[Anonymous No.17121257]

>>17120297
Indecisive dude here again
While I am at it, thoughts on these?
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/203457163294
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/394070510749
Thanks heaps

[Anonymous No.17121362]

ID on this watch?

[Anonymous No.17121420]

>>17121362
Rotary 'Canterbury'

[Anonymous No.17121511]

[Anonymous No.17121542]

Finally found this motherfucker after looking everywhere for it on ebay

Pulled the trigger right away

[Anonymous No.17121551]

>>17121542
wear it in health

[Anonymous No.17121553]

>>17121542
Very nice

[Anonymous No.17121567]

>>17103550
that typeset is so nice, damn

[Anonymous No.17121634]

just copped one of these recently

[Anonymous No.17121639]

What do you guys think of this car watch in this Rolls-Royce? Is it effay?
I'm a valet btw so I have a bunch of pictures of nice car watches

[Anonymous No.17121646]

>>17121257
GA-2000S-7A
>Pure white would most likely need cleaning often
>silver-white dial seems to help make the LED work beautifully
>customizable LED duration
>20bar
>carbon-resin base as well
>clean but detailed dial
>monotone dial gives me 2001:Space Odyssey ship vibes
>standard LCD display suits the dial perfectly
>standard CASIO accoutrements, world time, stop watch, alarms, timer etc.
>mode-dial because why not? AL>TR>ST>WT
>LED at 4:30
>lots of lume on otherwise white hands

pic related, personally i'd get this of the two but whatever floats your boat man

[Anonymous No.17121655]

>>17121257
GMA-S2100-7A
>cream white matte finish, probably still needs to be kept clean
>matching cream white dial with silver hour markers
>customizable LED duration
>20bar
>also has a carbon-resin base
>more minimalistic dial than the other
>clean dial gives the LCD screen and day-dial more attention
>LCD display is easy to read
>standard CASIO accoutrements, world time, stop watch, alarms, timer etc.
>day-dial
>LED at 4:30 also
>white/silver hands help with minimalist aesthetic but also have great lume

pic related

[Anonymous No.17121656]

>>17121639
dump them

[Anonymous No.17121657]

>>17121646
This one has more soul

[[e-mail] No.17121714]

>>17120320
>>promoting garbage.

[Anonymous No.17121719]

>>17121656

[Anonymous No.17121721]

>>17121719
love the illumination but those 12 and 6 markers are wide as fuck

should've used the Maserati trident at 6

[Anonymous No.17121724]

>>17121719

Make a new thread man, i want a /vc/ vehicle clock thread

[Anonymous No.17121731]

>>17121646
Thanks mate. I've had a good think about this today and yeah I agree. I reckon this one will be it.
Cheers.

[Anonymous No.17121765]

>>17121724

[Anonymous No.17121917]

>>17121731
Done it. Should have it in a week or so.
>>17121646
Thanks for your help friend

[Anonymous No.17121995]

the dw5600 is out of stock again on amazon after they restocked it a month or two ago. how many do you think they usually restock?

[Anonymous No.17122018]

>>17121995
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=dw5600&crid=5GCYN2J6446W&sprefix=dw5600%2Caps%2C288&ref=nb_sb_noss_1

seems they have some?

[Anonymous No.17122097]

>>17122018
Nice watched in those search results

[Anonymous No.17122198]

mfw japs complain that english speaking countries pronounce the brand Casio wrong when japs pronounce american brands like Coca Cola and Lincoln wrong,

[Anonymous No.17122200]

>>17102020
Just ordered one of these with the regular lcd display

[Anonymous No.17122612]

>>17120072
Ok so I just ordered the Casio Duro in Black as well, boys. I really liked it. Got the newer one without the Marlin which I like better because it's more clean (Casio not in position at the point in time to use the Marlin fish logo anymore due to copyright issues I believe).

[Anonymous No.17122618]

>>17122612
Wanted to add that I like that the Casioak is getting some love. I tested the black one which was quite cool. Not really my style but objectively cool.

[Anonymous No.17122647]

>>17121995
suffer

[Anonymous No.17122650]

Nato strap best strap

[Anonymous No.17122654]

>>17102070
>but $180 seems insane to pay for it

It is worth it, it is unique and looks stylish

[Anonymous No.17122665]

>>17103148
I have this but with an elastic band. Very comfortable because my wrists tend to grow and shrink a lot and it dries in about 15 minutes after soaking wet (so a lot faster than a nato).

[Anonymous No.17122670]

I have a few.

[Anonymous No.17122702]

>>17122198
KAH-see-oh

[Anonymous No.17122725]

around 130$ including shipping, should I? idk aaarrrrghhghg

[Anonymous No.17122829]

>>17122670
Far right looks sleek, what model?

[Anonymous No.17122863]

>>17122198
Rink-on

[Anonymous No.17122873]

Thoughts on picrel?

[Anonymous No.17123234]

>>17122873
Looks good. What's its weight?

[Anonymous No.17123284]

>>17123234
Like 45 grams. It’s cheap but I like the idea of the compass.

[Anonymous No.17123351]

>>17123284
That's light. I thought with the GPS etc in it it would be heavier

[Anonymous No.17123421]

>>17122198
>i've never met a Japanese person who ever got offended at how I pronounced a Japanese name
>none of the Japanese companies I've dealt with get upset or insulted over pronunciation at all
>every japanese person i've met is just happy to see people try to learn their language or like their culture in any way
>mfw your specious statement

[Anonymous No.17123439]

>>17122200
my inverted arrives this week hopefully but the regular LCD looks brilliant, only disappointing thing is not more Casio's come with EL

>>17122612
>>17122618
make sure you buy from reputable dealers - as far as I can tell the MDV's still come with a marlin
https://www.casio.com/us/search-result/?query=MDV&referrerPageUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.casio.com%2Fus%2Fwatches%2Fcasio%2Fproduct.MDV-106-1AV%2F&tabOrder=..%2Fen_US%2Findex.html%2Cproducts&facetFilters=%7B%7D&filters=%7B%7D&verticalUrl=en_US/products.html
it's a lovely, crisp and clean watch, personally i like the marlin

>>17122829
looks like an A700WM-7AVT

>>17122873
quite unique, don't see an inverted and normal LCD screen often
>nice bright EL
>world time and timezone map
>thermometer
>compass
would seriously consider buying this, any other watch brand would be 10x the price for these complications

[Anonymous No.17123612]

>>17101940
>€50
>Daily beater
>Quartz
>Hourly chime and if it has a digital display I want a 24 hour mode
>Any comfortable strap
>Lug to lug under 42mm

TL;DR
Recommend me a cheap comfortable Casio with a lug to lug of under 42mm, an hourly chime, and 24 hour mode.

[Anonymous No.17123630]

>>17117868
Looks great. Where'd you cop? (Model? I'm new to Casio's)

[Anonymous No.17123696]

>>17123612
where do you want to start man?

A158WA-1

>€67, can find it much cheaper online
>resin - chrome plated
>hourly time signal
>12/24 hour mode
>stainless steel band
>lug to lug is 32mm

[Anonymous No.17123702]

>>17123612

AE1200WH-1A

>€59, can also find it online cheaper
>resin case
>hourly time signal
>12/24 hour mode
>resin band
>lug to lug is 45mm, little larger than you wanted

[Anonymous No.17123707]

>>17123696
I've started looking and am currently considering A158, A168, A700, and A100. All of them can be had for under €50, A158 and A168 even just under €30.
Mostly considering comfort now, A700 has a milanese strap option and A100 has a leather strap option. Should I dislike the metal folded link band on the A158/A168 I'd either have to buy another or put it on a nato strap which only really suits the A158 because of the cut out lugs.

>>17123702
I like it a lot given the amazing functionality and can get it for a good price, but it's almost as long as the diameter of my small wrists.

Thanks for the help anon

[Anonymous No.17123710]

>>17123612

the one and only F91W-1

>€33, can find it online cheaper as well
>resin case
>hourly time signal
>12/24 hour mode
>resin band
>lug to lug is 38mm

[Anonymous No.17123715]

>>17123612

LA20WH-1B

>€43, can also find it online cheaper
>resin case
>hourly time signal
>12/24 hour mode
>resin band
>pretty sure the lug to lug is 30mm

[Anonymous No.17123727]

>>17123707

Casio spends their money on complications, mostly, these are cheap because they can do digital complications in their sleep. the bands on the other hand are a little more what-you-pay-for, the F91W for example, not a watch poster on this website wouldn't know what it is, and if they don't own one they know someone who does. is the band good? no, is it easily replaced and legendary because of how is still somehow lasts years? absolutely. my only real advice is the SS ones aren't the best and the milanese personally catch hair - but for me that wouldn't change if it were a Casio or a JLC

you make a good point though, if all else fails nato strap or third party band, but that might tip over the budget

[Anonymous No.17123728]

>>17123715
My nigga. Not him, but this is perfect.

[Anonymous No.17123741]

>>17123710
>>17123715
The resin bands to look comfortable and these watches are the most affordable, but I think it would look too autistic on me. When I see it on others it rarely doesn't look autistic.

>>17123727
Thanks that helps a lot, with that I'll scrap the A700 (milanese) and A168 (looks bad with nato). Currently looking at two watches, pic related. Not sure what nato would work best on this A158, maybe black or desert tan?

[Anonymous No.17123754]

>>17123741
Found a pic of that A158 with a black nato and I don't like it, but it does look pretty good on the black A158. I can't find the classic design black and blue A158 for sale, but I can find these two.
I'm starting to think the completely black A100 looks a bit too hipstery, so I'll probably go with the black and silver or gold and silver A158 then.

That's all I needed to know, thanks anon!

[Anonymous No.17123822]

>>17123741
>>17123754

this one?
https://www.chrono24.com/all/casio-collection-classic-vintage-water-resistant---3500-mm---nuovo--id21017836.htm

also try
>https://www.creationwatches.com/

i think the black/silver on a black nato would look good, the silver buckles compliment it well

sometimes all you can do is cut, paste and laugh
>pic related, ignore my photoshop skills

[Anonymous No.17123836]

>>17103020
that shit is so fat it looks like youre on house arrest.

for your wrist size if you are looking for similar features check out riseman GW9200

[Anonymous No.17123847]

>>17123741
beige one for consideration

[Anonymous No.17123852]

>>17123754
I wouldn't get an a158 if I were you, it doesn't have an electroluminescent panel, same shitty backlight as the f91w I'm pretty sure. Idk if that matters to you. I've always hated watches with shitty lights

[Anonymous No.17123856]

>>17123836
i have a bunch of modded ones i made that i think are p sweet thought id drop some here

[Anonymous No.17123858]

>>17123852
correct. the backlights are somehow even worse than the f91s. finnicky and flickery from my experience. ill solder on new leds to mine at some point im just too lazy.

[Anonymous No.17123859]

>>17123852
>>17123858

true but if he was >>17123612 like I assumed then there isn't a Casio under €50 EL that fits the criteria

[Anonymous No.17123862]

>>17123612
>>17123859
F-105

[Anonymous No.17123871]

>>17123862
good find, meets all of them

[Anonymous No.17123904]

>>17123871
its literally an f-91 with EL. I really wish theyd produce more variations. the blue themed face is heavy, thats really my only gripe with it.

[Anonymous No.17124032]

>>17123710
resin bands are super comfy bros

I recently paye 20€ for the F91W-1. Another shop near me (I live in Barcelona) sells it for 17-18€ box fresh.

>>17123862
I just tried this on my hand today. Bought one online from Amazon for 30 or so €. Can get it as cheap as 19€ some places if you're lucky though.

Anyone in this thread owning any CasiOaks whilst having a 16.5cm (or less) wrist?

[Anonymous No.17124181]

>>17123847
Thanks for the edit. I think it looks good, but very specific style that may not fit all outfits.

>>17123852
Shitty backlights are fine by me, I'd rather have comfort and an hourly chime. That said >>17123862 does look sweet and it fits all my requirements while also having a good backlight.

[Anonymous No.17124425]

I’ve had this pretty much since they released it. Great watch

[Anonymous No.17124750]

What do you think about bullbars, particularly on a model that already has a thick resin bezel?

[Anonymous No.17124754]

>>17124425
>no current time displayed in chronograph mode(s)
>"Great watch"

[Anonymous No.17124760]

Are there any video-essayists on Youtube that gush pretentiously over plastic watches like IDGuy does Rolex?

[Anonymous No.17124762]

all you need right here

[Anonymous No.17125116]

>>17124762
now make one for small wrists

[Anonymous No.17125158]

>>17125116
bottom right

[Anonymous No.17125168]

>>17125158
>1 watch
>watch collection
It's not even that hard to get a smaller quartz dress watch, sport watch, and G-Shock to complete it. What about Seiko Dolce SACM171, Citizen Promaster EP6050-17E, and Baby-G BGD-560-1ER? Sure there's 2 "women's" watches, but the whole sigma meme is about not giving a shit about what others think of you.

[Anonymous No.17125205]

>>17125116
>implying wearing a dw-9052 when it clearly doesn't fit isn't the height of sigma male wristlet cope

[Anonymous No.17125215]

>>17125205
Good point, that reminds me of reviewbrah sometimes wearing suits that are slightly too large.

[Anonymous No.17125354]

>>17124750
very ad-hoc and annoying in practice, good for abrasion resistance, useless for crush resistance, underside can dig into wrist
better to incorporate a uniformly raised mass of steel on the bevel face imo

[Anonymous No.17125384]

>>17125354
*bezel
also it tends to catch onto things

[Anonymous No.17125389]

>>17120203
please be more specific