/wt/ - Watch Thread

[Anonymous No.17076120]

Tudor Edition

Guides and Info:
> Poorfag guide: https://m.imgur.com/a/NFMXDuK
> Watch essentials 102: https://pastebin.com/Rc77hhXV (embed)
> Purchasing used watches: https://pastebin.com/f44aJKy2 (embed)
> Purchasing straps: https://pastebin.com/SwRysprE (embed)
> List of space watches: https://pastebin.com/Te6PNzxr (embed)
> /wt/ Pasta: https://pastebin.com/GBLwAm0f (embed)

Should I buy this MVMT / DW / "minimalist" fashion watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/6CNO8

Should I buy this Armani / Michael Kors / mall watch?
> https://imgur.com/a/Sw1FsAn

"Suggest a watch for me."
> Your budget
> Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot
> Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz
> Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, 2nd-time zone
> Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet
> Wrist size or desired watch size

old: >>17074161

[Anonymous No.17076125]

The Blob.

[Anonymous No.17076127]

>>17076125
Original for comparison.

[Anonymous No.17076131]

>>17076127
It's like a conventional Submariner-inspired dive watch fucked a G-Shock.

[Anonymous No.17076134]

>the nigger trigger

[Anonymous No.17076136]

>>17076125 > >>17076127

[Anonymous No.17076139]

I already have no chrono but really want this F1.
also
General opinion on Tag Heuer with explanation plox.
>inb4 hurr rolex durr

[Anonymous No.17076157]

>>17076139
>paying 1.5K for a Ronda quartz

[Anonymous No.17076167]

>Casio
>Radio controlled
>Solar powered

[Anonymous No.17076171]

>>17076139
You can't afford a Rolex?

[Anonymous No.17076172]

>>17076139
is tachometer the most useless complication?

[Anonymous No.17076179]

>>17076172
That would be jumping seconds

[Anonymous No.17076193]

>>17076157
Genuine question:
What’s wrong with it and why should I bother?

>>17076171
I can and I build rep with my AD atm
>b-but if you tell them you want day-date they’ll sell you one for sure
Lol.

[Anonymous No.17076199]

>>17076172
No.

[Anonymous No.17076202]

>>17076172
Moonphases are.
Like why the fuck do you need that? Are you a druid or something?

[Anonymous No.17076203]

>Jaeger LeCoultre
>Wolrd Time
>Chronograph
>Big date
>Grade V Titanium

[Anonymous No.17076214]

>>17076202
Its functional tho, jumping seconds is aesthetic and technical only

[Anonymous No.17076276]

>>17076120
Japan shopping spree when?

[Anonymous No.17076279]

>>17076202
>Are you a druid or something?
Yes

[Anonymous No.17076322]

>>17076202
Wholefully honest, there are scenarios in which a moonphase complication can result quite useful. When I travel to take photographs, knowing if there is going to be moonlight can make or undo the photo. That's why I opted for having one in my Speedy.

[Anonymous No.17076332]

>>17075916
A 39mm "jumbo" from that period was actually quite bigger in comparition. Here, you can see the 39 mm Seamaster superimposed over the 36mm Cosmic made just two years before. It's quite a difference.

>>17075954
Thanks, m8. Congrats for that GS. The strap looks great.

[Anonymous No.17076336]

>>17076322
That’s awfully specific, but ok…
>>17076279
Fookin treehuger
>>17076214
>jumping seconds
So essentially quartz?

[Anonymous No.17076338]

[Anonymous No.17076341]

>>17076203
>Grade V Titanium
source?

[Anonymous No.17076343]

>>17076338
That’s one thin wrist m8
Hit the gym

[Anonymous No.17076344]

>>17076343
wrist size is genetic

[Anonymous No.17076346]

>>17076338
Ahem, this is a sfw board, anon.

[Anonymous No.17076350]

>>17076344
>proper diet
>training
>steroids as a last resort

[Anonymous No.17076351]

Post ugly watches
I start

[Anonymous No.17076353]

>>17076343
>>17076346
Kek

[Anonymous No.17076354]

>>17076172
I use my tachymetre everyday to pass the time.

[Anonymous No.17076356]

>>17076351
Uglier

[Anonymous No.17076360]

>>17076322
Care to share some cool pics?

[Anonymous No.17076364]

>>17076336
>So essentially quartz?
There is a difference. Google "seconde morte", and check it, please.

[Anonymous No.17076375]

friendly reminder

[Anonymous No.17076377]

Longines and Tissot are so shit and soulless it's unreal. If you own watches from either of these brands you should sort yourself out

[Anonymous No.17076386]

>>17076360
Yes, hold on...

>>17076377
No, u.

[Anonymous No.17076391]

>>17076377
i do own watches from both of the brands
and your opinion is supported by... what?

[Anonymous No.17076393]

>>17076391
I have eyes. Disgusting pig shit.

[Anonymous No.17076395]

I just ordered one of these since it was 95 bucks on leaf amazon, will it mog the rest of my collection?

[Anonymous No.17076398]

So is there any microbrand who is not going for the luxury market?

[Anonymous No.17076405]

>>17076353
we reddit now

[Anonymous No.17076407]

>>17076398
Any mushroom brand that isn't going for the market is a rugpull.

[Anonymous No.17076408]

>>17076393
nah. you're just some nigger

[Anonymous No.17076412]

>>17076386
>>17076391
LARP

[Anonymous No.17076414]

Can I get a QRD on Omega drunk?

[Anonymous No.17076420]

>>17076322
>>17076386
>>17076360
I know this is highly off topic, but hope you like them, my friends.
>Pics taken from different parts of Africa, India, and South America.
>1

[Anonymous No.17076422]

>>17076408
Hello poorfag. You will never own a Rolex.

[Anonymous No.17076424]

>>17076375
better get the MOST POPULAR ONE
>sent from my iPhone
>in my toyota
>as I acquire a big mac
>wearing my Nikes
>gonna see Top Gun later

[Anonymous No.17076425]

>>17076420
>2

[Anonymous No.17076427]

>>17076425
>3

[Anonymous No.17076432]

>>17076427
>4

[Anonymous No.17076433]

>>17076422
nigger I can buy any rolex atm, but AD doesn't want to sell it to me
also
post your rolex

[Anonymous No.17076439]

>>17076432
>5 and final.

[Anonymous No.17076442]

>>17076414
>Can I get a QRD on Omega drunk?
He's 40+ years old. He's bought a bunch of old Omegas, one of which is nice, plus some other junk.
He has no family.
Personally, I don't think he's actually an alcoholic, he just drunkposts.

Not much more to say. There's not much to him.

[Anonymous No.17076447]

>>17076424
>iphone is popular because it's actually good
>toyota is popular because it's actually good (fuck toyota tho)
>big mac is popular because it's actually good (it isn't particularly but i get the appeal)
>nikes are popular because they're actually good
>Top Gun is actually pretty good movie
so you're just a contrarian nigger aren't you?
post your
>car
>food
>phone
>shoes
>movie
and fucking watch you nigger

[Anonymous No.17076452]

>>17076439
>>17076432
>>17076427
>>17076425
>>17076420
Fucking wow, lawyersama. Those are really great. Why the fuck are you a filthy lawyer when you can take pics like those?

[Anonymous No.17076454]

>>17076425
giggidy

[Anonymous No.17076455]

>>17076425
Mooooooods!

[Anonymous No.17076462]

>>17076452
>Why the fuck are you a filthy lawyer when you can take pics like those?
j00z gotta j00

[Anonymous No.17076466]

>>17076447
The NPC archtype. When buying clothes do you type in most popular brands 2022

[Anonymous No.17076470]

>>17076425
>>17076420
>tfw /wt/ is a better /p/ thread than a /wt/ thread
nice pics, mang

[Anonymous No.17076472]

>>17076377
>longines
>soulless
I mean Tissot I get. I think they're getting better but they were awful for years.

Longines has some really great stuff out now though and not just in their heritage line.

[Anonymous No.17076473]

>>17076447
>car
none
>food
60-100g of the finest macadamia nuts and pistachios
3 eggs
500g of plain chicken breast
1 container of natto
300g of baked salmon
1 shake consisting of:
454g of liquified broccolli
100g spinach
40g broccolli sprouts
500ml almond milk

>shoes
idk Tom Ford for formal, John Varvatos for semi, sketchers for slumming it

>movie
lots, Idk I was just picking top gun as the example

>watch
DINOZONE

[Anonymous No.17076483]

>>17076452
Thanks, M8. In order to travel, and buy watches and shit, I have to earn money somewhere. lol

>>17076454
>Oh right!!
>Giggidy
>Giggidy

>>17076455
No, u.

>>17076470
Thanks, my friend. I don't often visit /p/. It's generally shittier and so very boooring there.

[Anonymous No.17076492]

>>17076172
Can you really call a fixed bezel a complication?

[Anonymous No.17076494]

>>17076473
i take nattokinase and avmacol its a lot easier than choking down that nasty stuff

[Anonymous No.17076499]

[Anonymous No.17076501]

>>17076473
>car
>none
loool what a fag

[Anonymous No.17076509]

>>17076483
It’s been years since I’ve been, and I do remember it being boring. But it is one of the few places on le 4channel where you could get sober, practical, technical advice. Not that you need it.

[Anonymous No.17076511]

>>17076442
>another LARPer

cringe

[Anonymous No.17076513]

>>17076501
>pay uber guy to drive me wherever
>carcuck cries and seethes about traffic
nooooo

[Anonymous No.17076517]

>>17076513
Not the same guy, but I just want to say that uber and the likes of them is the most cuck thing ever. Either drive, or use public transport.

[Anonymous No.17076520]

>>17076473
>car
Volvo XC70

>food
salmon
chicken breasts
mushrooms broccoli
tempeh
bananas
usually when I eat out its a local pizza place

>shoes
Edward Green
Viberg
Stan Smiths
I have more too

>movie
last movie i saw in theaters was crimes of the future
favorite movies of all time are
Sorcerer
Sans Soleil
A Brighter Summer Day
Y Tu Mama Tambien

>watches
Tudor BB GMT
Several dress watches from the 40-60s by Longines, Seiko, Wittnauer
Squale 1521 matte blue

[Anonymous No.17076539]

>>17076447
>thinks iPhone is good
>thinks Toyota is good
>thinks Big Macs are good
>thinks Nikes are good
>thinks Top Gun is good

Absolute. PEAK. NPCtard.

[Anonymous No.17076543]

>>17076520
>great shoes
>horrendous taste in watches
Sad! Many such cases.
>>17076539
>>17076473
I want poor people to leave.

[Anonymous No.17076545]

Is Tudor a cope brand for people who can’t afford Rolex?

[Anonymous No.17076546]

>>17076120

[Anonymous No.17076552]

>>17076511
If you're nice to him, he might give you a free watch, anon. :^)

[Anonymous No.17076565]

>>17076543
post yours

[Anonymous No.17076567]

>>17076545
It's for people who can afford Rolex but are white

[Anonymous No.17076568]

>>17076543
listen, I know people hate squale, but the 1521 in matte blue is great. It's like a mini pelagos.

[Anonymous No.17076572]

>>17076567
Holy fuck, that's a level of cope I thought was only theoretical.

[Anonymous No.17076580]

>>17076567
your statement makes no sense at all, and please don't be racist against white people

[Anonymous No.17076582]

>>17076545
Obviously. The only people who disagree are coping.

[Anonymous No.17076584]

>>17076545
The uncomfortable truth that no one wants to say is that Rolex is the biggest cope brand of all.

[Anonymous No.17076588]

>>17076584
coping for what?

[Anonymous No.17076592]

>>17076588
>coping for what?
small dick? buy a rolex
socially awkward? buy a rolex
wife cheating on you? buy a rolex
etc.

[Anonymous No.17076593]

>>17076395
yes it will

[Anonymous No.17076594]

>>17076592
Hello poorfag.

[Anonymous No.17076602]

>>17076594
generally unpleaseant to be around? buy a rolex

[Anonymous No.17076609]

>>17076588
Rolex isn't anything special and you know it. It's the go to brand for anyone middle-class who wants to larp as being wealthy. And even Rolex knows this and intentionally limits people's ability to buy their products to create artificial scarcity and the illusion of exclusivity.
You can walk into any pawn shop and buy a Rolex right now. They are worn by scumbag used car salesmen, lawyers and pharmaceutical reps.
They are the biggest cope for people who want genuine high horology and real status symbols. People who think a Rolex is something special are no different than douchebags who think their BMW or Mercedes is something special; they're morons with more money than brains who know absolutely nothing and it shows.

[Anonymous No.17076649]

>>17076568
People hate squale?

[Anonymous No.17076654]

>>17076609
You typed a whole paragraph that I didn't read just to say you couldn't afford a Rolex. How quaint.

[Anonymous No.17076657]

>>17076568
I both love and hate this. In a way it kind of looks like a Fisher Price toy.

[Anonymous No.17076658]

[Anonymous No.17076661]

>mogs your archaic watch designs

[Anonymous No.17076663]

>>17076661

[Anonymous No.17076678]

>>17076654
(You)

[Anonymous No.17076681]

>>17076584
This is cope.

[Anonymous No.17076682]

>>17076661
>He doesn't use reflective prisms.

[Anonymous No.17076688]

>>17076681
What's the matter, loser?
Can't afford a Patek? You have to cope with your pawn shop special? Pathetic cuck.

[Anonymous No.17076690]

>>17076688
You don't need to direct your anger at me because you can't afford a Rolex. I'm just stating the obvious.

[Anonymous No.17076699]

>>17076509
Thanks again, my friend. I'm quite curious about what watch is that; I can't recognize it.

[Anonymous No.17076705]

>>17076167
You need more?

[Anonymous No.17076724]

>>17076341
Here are three examples of articles discussing different JLC watches.
To my knowledge, JLC only uses grade 5 titanium in their titanium cases and bracelets.

[Anonymous No.17076797]

R8 my watch

[Anonymous No.17076827]

>>17076546
Big dick energy

[Anonymous No.17076828]

>>17076663
dating yourself with that one

[Anonymous No.17076831]

>>17076545
75% of the time yes, the other 25% of the time it's people who could get the Rolex but would rather save some money and get the Tudor.

[Anonymous No.17076855]

At this price, why don't they use a butterfly clasp?
We already heard of $5 straps on luxury watches, but is there anyone else here who uses a strap that's more expensive than their watch?

[Anonymous No.17076870]

Morning

[Anonymous No.17076873]

>>17076870
Now we're coping

[Anonymous No.17076875]

>>17076870
Why are you naked? Also, that must be a really old Rolex, it's not even certified

[Anonymous No.17076877]

>>17076870
>he had to sell all his clothes to afford a Rolex
typical

[Anonymous No.17076879]

>>17076432
>>17076427
>>17076425
>>17076420
Yes avocado chan, I like. Let me see if I can find some travel pics on an hd somewhere. Just snapshots on automatic setting tho

[Anonymous No.17076880]

>>17076609
post your 5711 or youre the one coping

[Anonymous No.17076881]

>>17076875
Enjoying the morning sun in the garden. Yes, early 60's and the lack of text is what I like. It's just a seiko to most people.

[Anonymous No.17076893]

>>17076881
>It's just a seiko to most people.
It's basically just a Seiko to most Rolex owners too. They know you bought the very cheapest Rolex in existence simply to be able to say you own one. It's not even automatic.

[Anonymous No.17076900]

>>17076893
Most rolex owners don't care about watches, so that's quite alright.

[Anonymous No.17076904]

>>17076870
>You know Honda makes motors for F1 cars?
>Anyway, here's my '92 Civic. It's basically an F1 car.

[Anonymous No.17076910]

>>17076893
>They know you bought the very cheapest Rolex in existence simply to be able to say you own one
Well yeah, even back when it was new, that was the point of the hand-winding models.

[Anonymous No.17076912]

>>17076797
I r8 this at about 8 million.

[Anonymous No.17076915]

>>17076904
post rolex with timestamp or stop whining about the man's anticonsooomerism just because you're a consoooomer

[Anonymous No.17076925]

>>17076915
>the man's anticonsooomerism
That's a strange way to put it since he literally overspent on a watch of poor quality simply to get the name on the dial.

[Anonymous No.17076929]

>>17076473
>almond milk

[Anonymous No.17076930]

>>17076915
He's not rich. You don't have to simp that hard for him. He won't buy you a watch.

[Anonymous No.17076935]

>>17076661

[Anonymous No.17076984]

>>17076855
65€ Kaufmann strap on a 20€ HMT

[Anonymous No.17076988]

>>17076356
dilate

[Anonymous No.17076995]

>>17076661
the idea is very nicely executed but by god does it look like ass, is it all plastic?

[Anonymous No.17077012]

How much has /wt/ spent on a strap??
Do you regret it, or stand by your choice?

[Anonymous No.17077026]

>>17076925
>overspent
You have no idea what he spent, actually, you're presuming
>>17076930
You don't own a Rolex. Simple as.

[Anonymous No.17077028]

>>17077026
>You don't own a Rolex. Simple as.
Neither do you, quite obviously.
The difference between you and me is that you're absolutely ass blasted while I'm happy enough with my JLCs.

[Anonymous No.17077037]

>>17076915
>>17076870
>>17076120
>>17076134
>>17076171
Bought last year, rate my new watch

[Anonymous No.17077038]

>>17077012
Most was €120,-. No, don't regret it. It's like how shitty shoes can ruin an otherwise great outfit.

[Anonymous No.17077040]

>>17077037
It's a 41 right? Wore one for a week and it's not for me, proportions are off for me. But hey, different strokes for different folks and it's a good watch whatever anyone here will tell you.

[Anonymous No.17077041]

>>17077026
>whiteknighting a man
What's "her" endgame, bros?

[Anonymous No.17077042]

>>17076356
This watch reminds me of the aesthetic in tenshi no tamago, except more pristine. I'm sure someone could pull it off.

[Anonymous No.17077047]

>>17077040
yes, it is a 41, had to wait a while to get tho

[Anonymous No.17077050]

>>17077041
you're still butthurt over that guy's vintage Rolex so you attack your opponent instead of their statement, how sad

[Anonymous No.17077056]

>>17077042
>43.8mm diameter, 50.6mm L2L, 12.9mm thick
I take it back, to pull off that kind of aesthetic you wouldn't have the massive wrists needed to make this watch work. Would have been a different story if it was 34-37mm diameter <42mm L2L and ~10mm thickness.

[Anonymous No.17077058]

>>17077028
>you're absolutely ass blasted
Projecting your own anger onto me won't help you, bud
It's past your bedtime by the way

[Anonymous No.17077066]

>>17076322
>>17076425
>>17076427

i don't know much about photography, but whatever you did with filters or lenses on these shots gives one a sense of being present in that moment, that natural colour palette making the images seem immediate and 'real', which not to sound contradictory, creates the magical feeling that the images could come to life any moment
very well done, sir

very well done, indeed

[Anonymous No.17077069]

>>17077066
lulz, i mention link the marketplace, not the moonphase

[Anonymous No.17077070]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LORZg6vb2c

[Anonymous No.17077072]

>>17077066
It's modern phone camera's automatic postprocessing and stuff, that's why new phones have multiple cameras and depth sensors and additional image processing chips with their own firmware

[Anonymous No.17077075]

>>17077070
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUFkkdXvYig
because I'm not gay

[Anonymous No.17077079]

>be me
>bought a shitload of fake Rolex and Omega a few years ago in Malaysia
>post pictures of different ones at least once a week just to make poorfags feel bad

[Anonymous No.17077082]

>>17077066
It's literally just using a flash outdoors during the day for a subject who is in shadow. Could be film as well, hard to tell for certain but I lean towards thinking it is film because the white levels are too low and everything is a bit desaturated it would be trivially easy to make both of these perfect with a modern digital file, though it's also not that hard to get this look if that is what you are going for.

[Anonymous No.17077086]

>>17077037
I like it. Hands are super basic tho

[Anonymous No.17077088]

>>17076120
>Rolex Heritage Edition

3 Years in, warm-coloured bezel markers & numerals starting to fade to white - perfection.

[Anonymous No.17077089]

Pros
Never have to change a battery again
Your watch always runs

Cons
Solar is for hippies and commies
Anti-American and unpatriotic
Bad for the economy since you're not paying for new batteries
Worshipping the sun is idolatry

[Anonymous No.17077090]

>>17077088
What kind of rubber is that

[Anonymous No.17077092]

>>17077037
sorry but this is basic basic basic. Pure dumb rich guy that wants a "nice watch" shit.

[Anonymous No.17077094]

>>17077090
Vanguard

[Anonymous No.17077096]

>>17077037
ugly hands and the cyclops ruins everything else that's nice about this

[Anonymous No.17077098]

>>17077088
I could get behind it if not for Tudor's weird club hour hand. It just throws the whole look to me.
But if it's your speed, great. I really like it otherwise. I'll take it over a Rolex merc hand if I had to choose between them for some reason.

[Anonymous No.17077099]

>>17077090
>>17077094
I should probably follow up by saying I went for Vanguard as there is a short option (I hate being able to see the end of a strap behind my wrist), and Everest ones have that weird curve coming out of the lugs.

[Anonymous No.17077106]

>>17076545
just cos you can afford a rolex does not mean you should buy it

[Anonymous No.17077107]

>>17077037
Why do Rolex never get shit for not colour matching their date wheels? It looks like total shit, and that's before we mention the cyclops, which I will never understand.

[Anonymous No.17077108]

>>17077098
Yeah I've seen some pictures with merc hands, not a fan desu - my girlfriend calls it my 'watch with shapes', I find it endearing.

[Anonymous No.17077109]

>>17076343
Funny.
>>17076346
I don't get it.

[Anonymous No.17077112]

>>17077088
What jubilee bracelet is that? Is it generic or third party for the BB58?

[Anonymous No.17077113]

>>17077107
it is not a watch brand, just a symbol of "wealth"

[Anonymous No.17077117]

>>17077112
It's a strap code jubilee I originally bought for a vintage Rolex - but now I have a modern datejust with a Jubilee so it's a little redundant, I just put it on for fun occasionally as it's my only watch with 20mm lugs.

I wouldn't reccomend it however, It's pretty pisspoor quality, I'll probably get a fitted Uncle Seiko or something in the future when I sell my Datejust for a 124270 and get a Jubilee craving.

[Anonymous No.17077120]

>>17077112
>>17077117
Oh yeah, sorry, it's the straight-end strap code jubilee which I bought 'after-market' 555 rolex end pieces for on eBay.

[Anonymous No.17077150]

>>17077117
>>17077120
Thanks for the info, I'm probably going to buy a BB58 next month but would quite like a jubilee from uncle seiko for it, just wanted to make sure that wasn't one as the end links looked a poor fit.

[Anonymous No.17077151]

>>17077117
>I sell my Datejust for a 124270
Why would you do this.

[Anonymous No.17077189]

>>17077151
An idea I've been obsessed with for about a year is making a no-date collection, then I'll finish it off with some absurd unique complication that I have no hope of affording like a patek travel-time.

Plus my Santos mogs the datejust. So yeah, either 124270 or birth year 14270 - can't decide yet.

[Anonymous No.17077193]

>>17077189
You could've just said the datejust was too big for you

[Anonymous No.17077195]

>>17077151
>>17077189
So I have like 3 or 4 no-date watches for all occasions, then one complicated watch.

I can't seem to stop reiterating myself today.

[Anonymous No.17077206]

Which one would you choose? I was about to pull the trigger on the SPB143 and then Seiko goes and does this to me

[Anonymous No.17077208]

Help, /wt/
Thinking of buying pic related, but I already have a small automatic poorfag collection going that I wear on and off. Are these overrated or should I buy?

[Anonymous No.17077209]

>>17077206
Bottom, but ive never been a big fan of the tops case shape

[Anonymous No.17077252]

>>17077206
the 317 is more distinctive with that retro case

have you seen either of them on wrist, or are you going by pics ?


>>17077208
you can often find these on return in the amazon warehouse, from people who discovered they couldn't see the stealthed out display

usually nothing wrong with them, but they'll be returned as having 'scratch on case' which is usually the excuse from the original purchaser, and a downright lie

[Anonymous No.17077253]

>>17077208
Seems dumb to me enjoy not being able to read the digital display between 4 and 5 everyday

[Anonymous No.17077254]

>>17077206
I prefer the SPB143. Unsure about the case shape on the 317 but the 430 date is a watch killer for me.

[Anonymous No.17077258]

God damn why did Shane Tulloch have to stop making watches these are my cream dream

[Anonymous No.17077274]

What's everyone wearing today

[Anonymous No.17077279]

>>17077253
That's why I prefer the g2000 and g2200 because the light button also works to store the hands away

[Anonymous No.17077281]

>>17076120
Anyone know anything about Breda watches? I really like the design of this one but the price is suspiciously high. Is it just a shitty designer watch with crap quality?

[Anonymous No.17077284]

I want this piece of shit so bad but everything is expensive on a student budget.

[Anonymous No.17077289]

>>17077281
>but the price is suspiciously high.
Nigga it's under $200 what the fuck are you talking about?

[Anonymous No.17077290]

>>17077252
Purely online pics. I already own a PADI turtle though and I think the 317 has the same shape

[Anonymous No.17077291]

>>17077274
I love this pen. I own the same one

[Anonymous No.17077293]

Who's excited?

[Anonymous No.17077295]

>>17077291
Which refill do you use in it? I put a bold fischer space pen refill, writes much better than a regular space pen refill. I wanted to use gel but a space pen is better for my use, the grease and waterproof ink is a bonus for what I do, has saved me from redoing some paperwork. I also have 4 more of the same pen with different ink colors.

[Anonymous No.17077304]

>>17077284
Looks like something a 13-15 year old would wear.

[Anonymous No.17077306]

>>17077304
That's why I want it.

[Anonymous No.17077312]

>>17077274
This beaut

[Anonymous No.17077313]

>>17077312
You bastard. My envy is unmeasurable. The only thing that would upset me more is a chronosport sea quartz

[Anonymous No.17077316]

which should i get

[Anonymous No.17077327]

>>17077316
Put the extra cash in your rolex savings account instead :3

[Anonymous No.17077330]

>>17077316
Left. The golden one looks a bit cheap to me despite the fancy texture.

[Anonymous No.17077337]

JLC, Pattek or Rolex you watch nerds? I got some fat bucks and wanna spend 10k in a good watch. Dont care about models just tell me brand power

[Anonymous No.17077340]

>>17077295
I’ve had the pen nearly 2 years now and I don’t write enough to have had to refill it yet. You might be able to ask Reddit

[Anonymous No.17077345]

>>17077337
You can buy a jlc or rolex with that amount

[Anonymous No.17077348]

>>17076395
That's sexy

[Anonymous No.17077352]

>>17076395
>solar
oh no no, it will last a year max

[Anonymous No.17077355]

>>17077293
what is this?

[Anonymous No.17077358]

>>17077337
Nigger detected

[Anonymous No.17077362]

>>17077289
I'm not saying it's expensive, I'm saying it's in that Daniel Wellington "marked up Chinese crap" price range. If it was $50 I would know that it's just a cheap Chinese beater. But this price range is sus for a Nordstrom brand with no heritage. I'd rather drop $600 on a decent product than $200 on a marked up piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.17077364]

>>17077355
New Laventure release

[Anonymous No.17077369]

>>17076120
honestly thought it was a seiko from the thumbnail.

[Anonymous No.17077374]

>>17077340
I intentionally switched out the refill right away, never used the refill that came with it.

[Anonymous No.17077376]

>>17076398
What do you mean? What's your price range?

[Anonymous No.17077379]

>>17077364
Interesting brand, never heard of them, shame they are so limited.

[Anonymous No.17077380]

>>17076492
No. That retard doesn't know what a complication is. A dive bezel isn't q complication either, a complication only refers to movement features.

[Anonymous No.17077382]

>>17077362
You're obviously just paying for the design.

[Anonymous No.17077383]

>>17077380
Just admit you don't use your tachymeter

[Anonymous No.17077384]

>>17077383
I don't have a tachometer you fucktard.

[Anonymous No.17077386]

>>17077382
Tachymeter*
Fucking auto cucumber

[Anonymous No.17077395]

>>17077253
You can move the hands by pressing two buttons at once, but you still can't effectively use the display because as soon as you press any button the hands move back.

[Anonymous No.17077401]

>>17077395
Which 2 buttons? I didn't know it has a move hands out of the way feature. Also again the move hands feature on the ga2000 and 2200 is better because it only uses the light button and they stay out of the way untill you double press the light button again.

[Anonymous No.17077402]

[Anonymous No.17077410]

>>17077382
Apparently it's all stainless steel, I thought it would be coated resin or something. Probably close to a $100 markup. Not bad at all, and I can't really find anything else like it.

[Anonymous No.17077412]

>>17077410
Well there you go. If you like the design and it's the cheapest you can get that design then it's good value.

[Anonymous No.17077416]

>>17077401
Light + mode

[Anonymous No.17077419]

>>17077274
Keeping it simple. Really like this guy for around the house honestly, light and comfy with less risk of scratching something than a design with a metal case or bracelet.
>>17077208
As long as you're not paying some inflated scalper price go for it. Light, comfy and the rare G-Shock that doesn't look completely fucking retarded.

[Anonymous No.17077424]

>>17077419
And I forgot to actually attach my picture. This is my penance for phoneposting because I was too lazy to transfer the photo.

[Anonymous No.17077440]

>>17076724
That's pretty cool. I'm surprised everyone still uses grade 2 for watches. Grade 5 is the most common alloy so It's weird when companies try to make it a selling point.

[Anonymous No.17077446]

>>17077440
Does Tudor also use grade 2 for the pelagos?

[Anonymous No.17077553]

>>17077352
I have a 10 year old solar watch working like the first day

[Anonymous No.17077618]

>>17077364
What is the point of a brand that makes 200 watches once every 3 years?

[Anonymous No.17077640]

>>17077618
To make a quality product they really like and that will be sold out guaranteed every time?

[Anonymous No.17077689]

Anybody else still following the drunk irishman youtube drama? Apparently this popped up today but the domain was registered anonymously and he hasn't said anything elsewhere.

[Anonymous No.17077713]

>>17077689
Not really what did he do? Wondered where he was getting all his monies for his watches. If he just sold a few of his watches his problems would disappear. Typical rolex problems i guess

[Anonymous No.17077719]

>>17076127
Reminds me of those Tag Kiriums

[Anonymous No.17077723]

>>17077293
Daytona cope

[Anonymous No.17077759]

>>17077327
Based
>>17077316
They're all ass, get a digital shitter or a Rolex

[Anonymous No.17077767]

>>17077274
Casio pricing
>Shittiest shitter, steel case back, plastic front, plastic strap
$10, $5 or some bullshit when it gets a clearance label slapped on it at Walmart
>Shitter, steel back,steel band, plastic face
$20
>Steel case back, steel strap, steel FRONT
"WELL WELL WELL!!! What HAVE WE Here!! Look look look! You know, steel don't come cheap!! Haha, sees you looking at our premium model, welllll heeelooooo perhaps for a couple hundred dollars we can..."
Why are the Casio Jews so cruel?

[Anonymous No.17077772]

>>17077284
He cute

[Anonymous No.17077773]

>>17077618
They look cool

[Anonymous No.17077776]

>>17077767
That's why I got an aliexpress bezel. Also I've never seen legit casios for $10.

[Anonymous No.17077777]

>>17077773
The inset indices look is really cool, I don't think I've seen it before.

[Anonymous No.17077779]

>>17077767
if they make their top shelf models too cheap they'll be less popular because consumers tie price to value or something like that
the prices are all set for a reason

[Anonymous No.17077781]

>>17077767
Just bend over and accept it

[Anonymous No.17077782]

>>17077777
It's called a sandwich dial you moron and it's existed for decades.

[Anonymous No.17077784]

>>17077782
Never said it was unique, just that I hadn't seen it before.

[Anonymous No.17077786]

>>17077777
Trips make it true

[Anonymous No.17077787]

>>17077723
Lol

[Anonymous No.17077789]

>>17077767
what the fuck are you even on?

[Anonymous No.17077790]

>>17077777
Quints of cringe
Why do digits go the the least deserving?

[Anonymous No.17077791]

>>17077779
This is true. There was a shop here that sold quality merch and desided to open a second location in the rich part of town. No one bought anything. Then they raised the price of everything only in that store by 100% and it became a profitable location. Then they started setting the same high prices in both stores and first location started to have more sales than before. In short, people are morons and this is why Rolex watches sell so well.

[Anonymous No.17077792]

>>17077777
Holy mother of God (that's the virgin Mary btw)

[Anonymous No.17077793]

>>17077789
I'm just glad they're making more variations

[Anonymous No.17077794]

>>17077767
We need more expensive casios

[Anonymous No.17077796]

>>17077787
Only the one on the left looks good. The other ones are ass. Would love to get a rainbow daytona though
>>17077789
The same movement in a plastic casr would cost $20 and sale prices don't count, you linked a watch that cost $70 because it's made of steel. Casio's only saving grace is that they have the best water resistance of any watch maker.

[Anonymous No.17077797]

>>17077794
Just get an mrg, mtg, any top end master gshock or an oceanus.

[Anonymous No.17077798]

>>17077779
>>17077791
It also helps increase the perceived value of the lower end products. They both appear better value in comparison and get the sense it's part of a lineage able to compete in a higher bracket. 'The same guts as a $80 watch for $40?' kind of deal.

[Anonymous No.17077800]

>>17077791
If you don't value something, neither will anyone else.
If you hold something in high esteem, the crowd will follow.
Giving something away for free devalues it.
This applies to everything including people.
If you were a slut and gave it away to everyone for free don't expect anyone to value you now.

[Anonymous No.17077809]

>>17077689
Is this the guy that was Hawking Gerrard Perrigaux's royal oak homage to try and boost the value so he could make money by selling them?

[Anonymous No.17077810]

>>17077800
Sounds like cope to me.

[Anonymous No.17077811]

>>17077776
Walmart bins

[Anonymous No.17077813]

Okay, so I’m in the market for a vintage Rolex. What should I watch for for now to splurge on fake or perma damaged thing?

[Anonymous No.17077826]

Thoughts on this watch?

[Anonymous No.17077831]

>>17077796
>sale prices don't count
You can always find one or another Duro for under $50.
If it's such a big deal to you then you would work harder to save up for a better watch instead of bitching that Casio can't get even cheaper. They do what no one else does, be thankful for fuck's sake

[Anonymous No.17077833]

new thread
>>17070136
>>17070136
>>17070136

[Anonymous No.17077834]

>>17077798
Based

[Anonymous No.17077847]

>>17077826
Fashion shitter, avoid.

[Anonymous No.17077870]

>>17077833
>new
>06/11/22(Sat)
try again

[Anonymous No.17077871]

>>17077833
>he's still butthurt
Mate, there's been like 4 watches threads since you made that one. Just accept it, nobody wants to post in your gay ass thread

[Anonymous No.17077874]

>>17077831
I'm not the guy making the original complaint.

[Anonymous No.17077885]

>>17077813
That's not a Rolex. That's a vintage shitter with "Rolex" written on it.
No one will look at it and say "that's a Rolex".
Pic related is a Rolex.

[Anonymous No.17077889]

>>17077871
Why does that webm bother people so much, though? That's what I'm curious about? I don't know if you remember the thread a couple days ago but OP spent hours self-bumping his thread in an effort to kill the one with the webm in the OP.

[Anonymous No.17077893]

>>17077889
If you tell the same joke 40 times in a row people get tired of it

[Anonymous No.17077895]

>>17077813
That looks like a bad bodge job. It's probably worthless.

>I’m in the market for a vintage Rolex.
Honestly, vintage Rolex is a fucking shark tank. It's best to stay away until you've got the experience to know when you're getting a fair price or not. So many junkers are way overpriced because sellers know they can sell to guys who are so desperate to just own any Rolex.

[Anonymous No.17077898]

>>17077889
It doesn't bother me. I've been on 4chan long enough to where shit doesn't bother me anymore, but some people do get really angry when they're bored, or that particular meme may have been used to make fun of them in a previous thread and they get butthurt.

[Anonymous No.17077900]

>>17077889
I don't know anon, maybe because it doesnt show any watch at all? Maybe because it's a pain to find the watch thread in the catalog without a picture of a fucking watch? Maybe because no one wants to see a .webm of some balding dude? Maybe because it's a forced meme that is pushed by one guy only and no one finds funny? Maybe because there already have been a dozen of watch thread with that webm in the OP?
Jeez I really don't know... what could be the reason?

[Anonymous No.17077911]

>>17077900
>I don't know anon, maybe because it doesnt show any watch at all?
But he's clearly wearing a gold-tone Casio.

[Anonymous No.17077914]

>>17077900
>Maybe because it's a pain to find the watch thread in the catalog without a picture of a fucking watch?
Literally search for /wt/ you fucking troglodytic retard. I can't believe people this stupid discovered 4chan.

[Anonymous No.17077915]

>>17077900
>no one wants
Speak for yourself anon. I find it funny as hell, and people getting triggered by it only makes it funnier.

[Anonymous No.17077917]

>>17077911
>clearly
No, that's not clear at all.
Also, answer my other points you fucking nigger.

[Anonymous No.17077920]

>>17077826
0/10 mall shitter

[Anonymous No.17077921]

>>17077826
Generally speaking, watches branded for some well known fashion brand are third party productions being whitelabeled for them. It's not universally true and even for the ones where it is they aren't universally trash, but they're certainly not the best for the money. Not much different from a Daniel Wellington or some other fashion watch line.

[Anonymous No.17077923]

>>17077826
Holy SHIT bro is that a Gucci? Nice!!!

[Anonymous No.17077940]

>>17076139
Im a weirdo that likes tag but the f1 line is trash. Buy a used carrera 16 if youre poor

[Anonymous No.17077944]

>>17076879
>>17077066
Thank you very much, m8's. I trully appreciate your coments about my photography.

>>17077072
lol I can't take a good phone pic for my life, as you can clearly see in my wristscans. I use a Sony a77ii.

>>17077082
It's a little bit more than that, my friend, but I do use digital. I learned post processing in ICP.

[Anonymous No.17077948]

>>17077944

[Anonymous No.17077951]

>>17077948

[Anonymous No.17077954]

>>17077951
And, no more, as I do understand this is a watch thread and not a photography thread. lol

[Anonymous No.17077963]

An interesting video from a non watch aficionado:

https://youtu.be/_Pl-CewTAl8

[Anonymous No.17077968]

>>17077944
if he doesn't make it as a footballer, that heterochromia could be his fortune
really interesting subject; wouldn't surprise me if he became a model in future

[Anonymous No.17077975]

>>17076797
still thinner than a tudor black bay gmt

[Anonymous No.17077982]

>>17077917
>Also, answer my other points
Why? They're all just your bullshit opinions you fanny-flustered tranny

[Anonymous No.17077985]

>>17077847
>>17077920
>>17077921

>all that cope

Why do fashion brands make watchfags so nervous?

[Anonymous No.17077986]

>>17077985
They don't want to admit they spent thousands on something literally no one cares about.

[Anonymous No.17077998]

>>17077917
>No, that's not clear at all.
It Isn't? No, wait...oh my god, it's clear as day! Heavens no, someone's posting watch content in a watch thread?! How could this happen?!

[Anonymous No.17078010]

>>17077885
>No one will look at it and say "that's a Rolex".

Unless you tell them it is

[Anonymous No.17078027]

>>17077998
>someone's posting watch content
Lets be honest there, that video is hardly watch content, and even if it was, we got the point the first 50 times.

[Anonymous No.17078033]

>>17078027
Now he's gonna post it every thread since you sperged out so hard over it

[Anonymous No.17078051]

>>17078033
Don't kid yourself, he's been sperging for weeks.

[Anonymous No.17078055]

>>17078051
Truly, it's the webm that broke /wt/. It even causes more anguish than "Can't afford a Rolex?"

[Anonymous No.17078063]

>>17078055
if you post anything over and over again it will piss people off, it's not any kind of acheivment

[Anonymous No.17078064]

>>17078033
This is literally my only comment about the video you retard and he's already been posting it in every thread

[Anonymous No.17078066]

>>17077689
Never heard of him but sounds just like that Australia cunt that sold fakes to fuel his gambling addiction.

[Anonymous No.17078070]

>>17078063
Sounds pretty based to me

[Anonymous No.17078072]

>>17078063
Pissing you off seems pretty easy, if we're being honest. No surprise, there. Inability to regulate one's emotional responses is a characteristic of autism.

[Anonymous No.17078074]

>>17078066
Why does every watch channel have that incandescent light on a shelf in the background?

[Anonymous No.17078075]

>>17070136
>>17070136
>>17070136
>>17070136
NEW BREAD

[Anonymous No.17078077]

>>17078074
It comes as part of your YouTube Watch Content Creators' Starter Pack. You don't have to use it but it's still pretty nice.

[Anonymous No.17078079]

>>17078075
jej

[Anonymous No.17078081]

>>17078077
>YouTube Watch Content Creators' Starter Pack

Don't forget the quirky Rolex wall clock or the G-shock Man figurine

[Anonymous No.17078082]

>>17078081
You got a G-Shock Man? Mine came with a lame Speedmaster poster.

[Anonymous No.17078084]

>>17078082
Trade?

I'll throw in the black plastic rim glasses, too

[Anonymous No.17078088]

>>17078055
We need to find that guy in real life and get a recording of him asking why we can't afford a Rolex.

[Anonymous No.17078102]

>>17078088
Can you pay for it? I'm saving up for a R*lex

[Anonymous No.17078109]

>>17078102
I guess I could. I'd have to free up some cash, though, by selling my ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

[Anonymous No.17078114]

>>17077954
>>17077951
>>17077948
>>17077944
Very nice pictures, lawyer. Seriously good.

[Anonymous No.17078130]

>Beautiful Jenni Elle new video
>Talking about the based Speedmaster
https://youtu.be/_ZEHHi36FnY

[Anonymous No.17078138]

>>17078130
>2 years ago she pronounces it "amiga"
>today she pronounces it "ommagah"

what a fraud

[Anonymous No.17078153]

>>17077985
What does 'cope' even mean at this point?

[Anonymous No.17078164]

>>17078153
>What does 'cope' even mean at this point?
A general feeling of unhappiness or unease.

[Anonymous No.17078173]

New thread
>>17078171
>>17078171
>>17078171
>>17078171
>>17078171
>>17078171