[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 388 KB, 640x1050, lb1oha6m8bu31.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15916173 No.15916173 [Reply] [Original]

I've been really getting into dark academia lately as I usually dress /tip/ but prefer the darker and more academic look.
Post inspo, fits, advice and recommendations here.

>> No.15916245

What would you call dark academia but with jeans, and simpler shirts but still earth tones. Also plain color hoodies?

>> No.15916265

>>15916245
I'd probably call it "dark academia but with jeans, and simpler shirts but still earth tones"

>> No.15916353

>>15916265
Thanks my man

>> No.15916363
File: 11 KB, 251x242, 1483283566513.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15916363

>>15916173
What the fuck is "dark academia" and why does it look like my 30 year old wardrobe. I hate cooperations which is why I never buy branded shit. I hate america, which is why I don't buy jeans. And earthly colours in a traitional fit are just economic, as it will be timeless no matter what.

>> No.15916371

Hogwarts homosexual ass wardrobe

>> No.15916399

>>15916245
could be work wear

>> No.15917320

>>15916371
Neat

>> No.15917439

>>15917320
Femboy

>> No.15917520

>>15916245
a boring non- aesthetic

>> No.15917522
File: 66 KB, 584x876, 4677e1c59c11250cf50c6a833723524d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15917522

who cares if you fags think it looks gay, just post pictures.

>> No.15917526
File: 1.23 MB, 1200x1968, 1592676543617.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15917526

>>15916173
posting the HD version of OP's image since you can't see shit on his

>> No.15917567

>>15917526
Thanks

>> No.15917569

>>15917526
Thanks anon my eyes were straining.

Any thoughts on what sort of hats would be a good match for this, if any? The winter hat I wear with my peacoat is a fur ushanka, but no doubt there are better matches? Flat caps are a given I imagine, but there must be something else

>> No.15917597

>>15917569
flat caps, berets, newsboy caps, breton caps, maybe docker hats. but alot of hats in this style is pretty larpy, hence why you won't find very images featuring them.

>> No.15917638

If you’re gonna be wearing mfa shit at least go full Patric Bateman, not this pretentious pomo communist twink core shit lmao

>> No.15917747
File: 428 KB, 1219x1080, artist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15917747

this is peak dark ac

>> No.15917924 [DELETED] 
File: 1.61 MB, 1200x1968, computer science pseud wear.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15917924

your gf will always be a hologram

>> No.15918745

>>15917747
For real though

>> No.15919024

is there a female version of this obscure preppy shit? because i'm simping for it

>> No.15919439
File: 1.76 MB, 1080x1350, 1568403002221.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15919439

>>15919024
dark academia is mostly a female aesthetic. just check out google images, pinterest or tumblr, you'll find thousands if potential inspo pics

>> No.15919447

>>15919439
>dark academia is mostly a female aesthetic
because bitches bastardized and slapped a tumblr label on men’s style

>> No.15919452

>>15919447
seethe

>> No.15919458

>>15919447
No it's because 95% of young men think fashion is for fags and prefer wearing ill-fitting skinny jeans and a graphic tee, whereas women generally have more aesthetic sensibilities, hence why there are so many more women in the arts, humanities etc.

>> No.15919460

>>15919447
this
it’s like Chris Chan recolouring Sonic and pretending it’s a new character

>> No.15919475
File: 48 KB, 640x425, 46AEDF30-64B3-472F-8F34-6E962F56B1A2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15919475

>>15919458
>over generalization, straw men, hasty conclusion, mistakes correlation for causation

>>15919460
Who?

>> No.15919477
File: 95 KB, 580x580, m_5d2bc8e98557af797bc4dccf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15919477

Could this recent cawp be incorporated into dark academia?

>> No.15919486

>>15919477
Jesus fuck, no. Go away.

>> No.15919494

>>15919475
who cares if men "created the aesthetic". I said it is "mostly a female aesthetic" in my original post because it simply is. ask a bunch of guys what they think about "dark academia" then ask a bunch of girls. There's your fucking proof retard.
also,
>doesn't know Chris-Chan
gtfo newfag.

>> No.15919503

>>15919494
I apologize for being unfamiliar with your transgender hero, son.

>who cares if men "created the aesthetic".
People understand the importance of knowledge and the process of learning care.

>I said it is "mostly a female aesthetic" in my original post because it simply is.
It very well may be.

>ask a bunch of guys what they think about "dark academia" then ask a bunch of girls. There's your fucking proof retard.
How does conducting a convenience sample survey constitute as “fucking” proof?

>> No.15919509

>>15916265
>>15917747
>>15919447
>>15919460
>>15919503
based anons