[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion

View post   
File: 272 KB, 2000x1863, 162050C_A_107X1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15905561 No.15905561 [Reply] [Original]

Thinking of buying a cheap pair of high-top sneakers, currently have none. Vans or converse?
Or should I not bother? Totally clueless about sneakers.

>> No.15905567

>>15905561
Do you want canvas sneakers? If so, they are pretty much the main options.

>> No.15905794

Connies

>> No.15905919

>>15905561
Converse Chuck 70, more tasteful than vans imo and the 70s are a higher quality version of the regular chucks

>> No.15906123

>>15905561
If you want a cheap canvas hightop I'd go converse above anything else. Having owned both sk8 his are generally inferior in terms of comfort and overall aesthetics imo. They're also usually a bit cheaper.

>> No.15906170

>>15905919
fuck chuck 70's lol they're so bad. Just get made in USA dead stock or made in Japan. &0's are more pleb than regular cons.

>> No.15906229

Chucks are for skinny feet

>> No.15906273

>>15905561
If cheap is your priority, you can honestly get an OK pair of imitation high-tops from Walmart. They'll last you like a year at most but won't run higher than maybe $15

>> No.15906323
File: 1.00 MB, 1024x768, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15906323

get some Rick

>> No.15907072

>>15906323
Bet this gets the bitches wet when they come in

>> No.15907100

>>15905561
Chucks look good but don’t last for shit, from my experience. Skate sneakers tend to last longer.

>> No.15907108

>>15905561
Converse 70s

>> No.15907113

>>15906323
How many boxes say "Round Owens"

>> No.15907149

if you want a sleeker shoe, go for converse, as it looks more "skinny", vans are a bit chunkier.

>> No.15907158

>>15906323
>cheap pair of high-top sneakers

>> No.15907715

>>15905561
Converse 70s are the way to go
Vans His are plaaaayed out

>> No.15907861

>>15907715
Why they bad

>> No.15908091

Check the thirft store periodically, I got a pair of fresh off white chucks hi tops for 10$ that are better quality than the converse I got at home

>> No.15908097

>>15907158
My thoughts exactly.
Talk about overstating the obvious.

>>15908091
>white cucks

>> No.15908101
File: 292 KB, 750x736, B7CFFB2D-E2DC-43C0-A5B7-9EF6EFAEA7E4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15908101

>>15905561
They’re the doc marten fulmar derby. Just a regular pair from the brand but they’re nice, I like mine

>> No.15908105

>>15906170
my full leather chuck 70's have been going strong for the last 4 1/2 years idk what you're on about

>> No.15908110

>>15906323
ID on that black pair next to the reds

>> No.15908115

>>15908097
They are extremely effay if you're an active person
>/fa/
Nevermind

>> No.15909288

>>15905561
Converse if you're a girl (female)

>> No.15910004
File: 353 KB, 1956x1191, D3LiwqNW4AAOxUT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15910004

>>15906323

>> No.15910017

>>15906323
how about ya get some dick

>> No.15910025

>>15905919
As someone who walked a pair of classic chucks to the insole every year in High school, the 70's are a MUCH better shoe.

>> No.15910624
File: 399 KB, 828x827, image0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15910624

>>15905561
PF Flyers and Keds are decent
>>15905567
You are a retard

>> No.15910788

>>15908110

literally just black geobaskets

>> No.15910837

>>15910004
w2c?

>> No.15910914

>>15905561
70s

>> No.15910918

>>15905561
spring for the chuck 70s. much comfier and sturdier material

>> No.15911019

>>15907715
Converse 70's are as pleb as you can get

>> No.15911023

>>15906170
most based answer