[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/fa/ - Fashion


View post   

File: 812 KB, 970x910, Screenshot_20201226-210135.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15818263 No.15818263[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Just asking for a friend :)

>> No.15818276

Bikinis - made for the purpose of sexual liberation, sacrifices function in order to be a whore and get skin cancer
Miniskirts - sexual freedom, restricts women's movement so they can look like a whore but they can't walk properly
Thong bikinis - made to get around Los Angeles's ban on nudity, so they look naked without being naked
Tube tops - just retarded
Short shorts - specifically dolfin shorts, which is the hooters uniform
Wrap dresses - made for the purpose of having one night stands, they have no buttons or zippers so they are easier to take off

Those are off the top of my head. If you have sex before marriage you are a Jew slave.

>> No.15818285

>>15818263
Nothing good

>> No.15818286

>>15818276
Oh I missed an obvious one because I was thinking of clothing. Makeup is fashion too.

Max Factor is the "father of makeup." Jew.

http://www.beautyliestruth.com/blog/2015/2/why-do-men-run-the-beauty-industry

Why do "men" run the makeup industry, more like why do Jews run the makeup industry.

Here are the companies listed in the article: L'Oreal, Revlon, Estée Lauder, OPI Nail Polish, and MAC Cosmetics

L'Oreal - Françoise Bettencourt Meyers, the owner, married a Jew and is raising her kids Jewish. So the family owned company is Jewish now.

Revlon - Jewish brothers Charles and Joseph Revson founded Revlon. Ronald Perelman is the chairman and his daughter Debra Perelman is the president and CEO. They are also Jewish.

Estée Lauder - The Lauder family is Jewish. William P. Lauder is the current executive chairman.

OPI Nail Polish - Suzi Weiss-Fischmann, Jewish, is the co-founder, CEO, and president.

MAC Cosmetics - MAC became owned by the Jewish Estée Lauder Companies in 1996 so MAC is also Jewish now.

>> No.15818289

>>15818276
>>15818286

Thank you anon can you recommend safely non-influenced fashion?

>> No.15818294

>>15818276
Found the incel lol

>> No.15818297

>>15818263
Both of those photos have clear German influence, asshat

>> No.15818299
File: 28 KB, 441x408, AreYouUpset.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15818299

>>15818276
Kek look at this faggot whining about girls in bikinis

>> No.15818304
File: 772 KB, 1011x1173, KEANU LEEVES VIBES.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15818304

22PJccu

>> No.15818307

>>15818276
>>15818286
B B B BASED doin God's work anon. Please share some more kike owned businesses

>> No.15818313

>>15818289
Jeans are also Jewish I forgot. Levi Strauss was a Jew.
Just wear what your ancestors wore. Everything past industrializaton is (((influenced))). Wear nice pants (not jeans) and a coat. Jeans are for tough work only, not for going out in town. T shirts were popularized by (((Hollywood))) in the 50s and 60s. It doesn't seem right for a man to go out in shorts or a t shirt. It seems very underdressed. T shirts actually became a symbol of the degenerate anti-traditional culture of the 70s and 80s. I would stick with coats/jackets and pants. Like something you'd find in a nice period film.

>> No.15818317

>>15818299
Yes. Don't be a cuck who lets his wife and daughters show their wedgied ass to the world.

>> No.15818320

>>15818313
But anon Jacob Davis(also a jew) invented the riveted jeans that Levi Strauss sold

>> No.15818326

>>15818276
cope incel cope

>> No.15818332
File: 3 KB, 100x100, bapho.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15818332

>>15818320
when the (((historians))) are (((in on it)))

>> No.15818340

>>15818313
Thanks anon. I'm already pilled on jeans and purged them from my wardrobe years ago.

I'm not convinced on t-shirts. Traditional attire was designed before cheap automated knit jersey, and once you have knit jersey, t-shirts and light sweaters suddenly make a lot of sense. I often wear a light crew neck merino base layer under a suit jacket and trousers in place of a traditional shirt. It's comfy and modern, but formal enough for any even on the west coast.

It's possible the short sleeve t-shirt itself is too informal to ever be worn. Perhaps it should be replaced with sleeveless for the gym and long sleeve for other occasions. But fine knit jersey itself is a good thing IMO.

That said, I usually do try to wear traditional cut button shirts in linen and cotton in summer. The other problem though is modern no-iron fabrics, which feel disgusting and are probably injected with gay chemicals. Must-iron fabric is much nicer.

>> No.15818343
File: 349 KB, 549x797, 1607893554020.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15818343

>>15818326
How does this make you feel?

>> No.15818348
File: 298 KB, 1024x708, gettyimages-548866349-1024x1024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15818348

>>15818313
Non-t-shirt athletic gear

>> No.15818350

>>15818340
I think coats on men is a form of modesty too. If women cover certain body parts, the male equivalent is arms and chest. Anything that shows off those would be considered immodest on a man.Traditionally, women cover their legs by wearing long dresses so their butt and thighs curves aren't showing through pants. I can't imagine a king or high scoiety man out in a t shirt. T shirts began as underwear.
>The T-shirt evolved from undergarments used in the 19th century
From wiki
Modern fashion is different but eventualy I'd like to move back to traditional fashion. Immodesty seems like a fad that will vanish once everything stops being so pozzed.

>> No.15818352

>>15818343
Texas or Pretoria?

>> No.15818353
File: 143 KB, 964x642, article-0-19CAA81F00000578-927_964x642.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15818353

>>15818348
Or even

>> No.15818355

>>15818348
Kids can wear whatever they want. It's not imporper on kids. Also that's not in public.

>> No.15818357

>>15818353
Yeah that's pretty weird.

>> No.15818371

>>15818350
This is a long-standing theological question about the aesthetics of the body. Modesty is itself defined only with reference to what forms of beauty are part of the desired social and cosmic order, and which are not. Romans and greeks regularly went nude for athletics, swimming, and other such occasions. Their philosophy exalted the beauty of healthy bodies. I believe that at least this can be done without nefarious influence from the forces of darkness.

With christianization, european philosophy tended to look more upward and beyond this world for our inspiration, de-aestheticizing the things of this world. This led to much more restrictive modesty standards. This too is fine as it went, though I personally believe that it involved some theological errors.

In the post-christian judaized era, jews promote sexual immodesty as an inversion of christian morality. It's essentially occult motivation: if they can pervert the standards of their superiors, they gain a perverse sort of power from that. That's why immodesty today is as you say.

But I think we need not invert their "morality" as they inverted our forefathers'. We can find room for the expression of corporeal beauty in our fashion. But this should be done without the perverse and lawless forms of sexuality that they promote. We can even turn their inversion tactics back on them; an athletic and beautiful white male body unadorned with symbols of sin or subjection has almost as much power as a cross against demonic influence these days. The key is to marry confident corporeal beauty with unambiguous virtue. I believe this is among the most powerful weapons we have in bringing light to the world.

>> No.15818376

>>15818355
Kids should dress to adult standards.

>> No.15818438

>>15818376
Depends how old the kid is yeah.

>> No.15818458

>>15818371
Greeks are niggers and Romans watched real people die for entertainment like a bunch of savages so me caring about what they say is probably not going to happen.

Christianity aestheticized everything. Art, architecture, clothing. The more clothes you add, the most aesthetic potential you have. Modesty is not restrictive in the slightest. That's one of the feminist myths. Immodesty is extremely restrictive, especially on women. You can't move freely in a short skirt. Clothes are too tight. Girls constantly pick at their shorts because they're uncomfortable. They're constantly pulling their tops up because they won't stay on. Women's pants are such a pain most women take them off and change into something else when they get home. Corsets are extremely comfortable and help with posture. Big poofy dresses allow the legs to move freely. The idea that modesty is restrictive at all is such projection from feminists who can't even keep their shoes on for a night.

I think you underestimate how degenerate the ancients were. Them accepting nudity doesn't mean their nudity wasn't sexual and savage.

>> No.15818579

>>15818458
based

>> No.15818636 [DELETED] 

>>15818263
>>15818276
>>15818285
>>15818286
>>15818304
>>15818332
>>15818343
>>15818348
>>15818353
>>15818371
>>15818458
>>15818579
take meds shitters. Right winger "human rights recipients" should be cheese grated to death feet first.

>> No.15818639

>>15818636
By whom?

>> No.15818661

>>15818263
Every time the picture of Kerry Grant is used in a badly cropped whatsapp comparison by boomers who can't dress for shit part of me dies

>> No.15818662
File: 18 KB, 600x600, 4A35DA17-0007-48D7-A6F3-555D4CEAB6AA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15818662

>>15818636

>> No.15818790

>>15818636
Seething

>> No.15818848

>>15818661
If you're unironically implying Cary Grant couldn't dress you need to kill yourself.

>> No.15818879

>>15818848
I'm implying the boomers posting the exact same picture of him can't

>> No.15818949
File: 36 KB, 540x471, 7BD61738-B4EC-4ED5-9E1D-D62A4B543273.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15818949

>>15818263
What a bunch of schizos lol

>> No.15820238

>>15818949
t. faggot

>> No.15820271
File: 305 KB, 1200x1200, john-galliano-20656947-1-402.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15820271

>> No.15820276
File: 240 KB, 1600x1067, dvf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15820276

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Jewish_fashion_designers

>> No.15820464

>>15818343
>Woman wearing pants

>> No.15820708
File: 61 KB, 500x582, dRZ5v7x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15820708

Imagine, just imagine, spending your precious life worrying about the Jews.

>> No.15820767
File: 35 KB, 700x500, 5e750181f9416f9508d8907812d95e56.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15820767

The lack of Bapes is a jewish conspiracy, fuck them nike ass faggot niggas.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZqOlZWk218

>> No.15820819

>>15820464
Based.

>> No.15820821

>>15818636
> the "tolerant" left everyone.
Remember, they're all like this lol

>> No.15820876

>>15818276
based and harenjipilled

>> No.15821816

>>15820708
T. Kike

>> No.15823008

hy