Bottomless style

[Anonymous No.15661110]

Hi /fa, I think we can all unequivocally agree that the #metoo campaign and all the sexshaming fallout that followed reached the intent of soften guys approach to the other sex. The fear of having hard legal repercussions is relegating sex again to the sentimental sphere, removing it from cheap abusive male behavior.

Finally, onlyfans and other digital technologies are providing girls new means of sexual liberation, and boys new means of simping without feeling judged. Reducing the social stigmas attributed to simping by toxic masculinity.

Here my idea: now that society is a safer place, would we be ready to introduce bottomless style for girls as a legal mean to be dressed. I can argue for it from the freedom point of view:

If girls are free they should not feel any fear from males. If punishment are harsh enough, males will not touch nor make inconsiderate moves

From the style point of view: girls are spending energy and money to carefully style their pubic hairs, and it’s a pity to be allowed to show the results only online

Do you have any other good arguments for or against this evolutionary idea?

[Igor1976 No.15661113]

[Anonymous No.15661122]

>>15661113

[Anonymous No.15661127]

>>15661110
Men exposing their genitalia in public is indecent, women exposing their genitalia in public is also indecent. Stop pushing degeneracy under the guise of 'liberation'

[Anonymous No.15661135]

>>15661127
>indecent
What makes you think that something is indecent or not? Do you realize this is a fashion image board?

I argue for this getting in fashion and at that point it will not be indecent. The same as nowadays online. For men things are quite different since they want to do it in any case just to bother everyone else, ever been on Omegle? Woman do it for fashion instead.

By the way even bottomless guys could be an option once you stop getting erect at the view of horses

[Anonymous No.15661137]

>>15661135
So true: nobody argues against nude Greek statues of athletes. Since those are an example of fashion

[Igor1976 No.15661140]

I have sagging ass and cellulite

[Igor1976 No.15661141]

and mantits. but I had them from child

[Anonymous No.15661142]

>/b/ tier thread again

[Anonymous No.15661147]

>>15661135
>What makes you think that something is indecent or not?
The law? public indecency is illegal dude.

>I argue for this getting in fashion and at that point it will not be indecent.
Regardless of what happens in the world of haute couture, women WILL get groped by men in public. To think otherwise is totally naive, regardless of how severe the punishment would be.

[Anonymous No.15661161]

>>15661147
OP here: I’m not arguing for this happening in public transport. Just more in public than now.

Surely I’m arguing about liberating woman from the kind of judgmental stigmas, and machismo laws like the ones you mention, that are still present even in this board

[Igor1976 No.15661167]

God I need that bitch

[Igor1976 No.15661169]

So young and fresh

[Igor1976 No.15661175]

Wide hips on girls always kinda alienated me, no homo. They both really magnetize me and also weird me out

[Igor1976 No.15661181]

Needy women are a turn off. I want my girl to be strong, cheerful, sweet and supportive.

[Anonymous No.15661190]

>>15661167
>>15661169
>>15661175
>>15661181
Chemical castration is the only appropriate punishment for a behavior like this poster. I’m sure that a proper castration therapy would tame him down

[Igor1976 No.15661193]

>>15661190
I haven't had sex since 1996. At this point I would suck a woman's shit off the floor just to feel close to her.